Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Performance Optimization of Ratings-Based Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.07755 v1 pith:MQIHFG5Z submitted 2025-01-13 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords rbrlratingslearninghumanhyperparametersperformancereinforcementreward
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper explores multiple optimization methods to improve the performance of rating-based reinforcement learning (RbRL). RbRL, a method based on the idea of human ratings, has been developed to infer reward functions in reward-free environments for the subsequent policy learning via standard reinforcement learning, which requires the availability of reward functions. Specifically, RbRL minimizes the cross entropy loss that quantifies the differences between human ratings and estimated ratings derived from the inferred reward. Hence, a low loss means a high degree of consistency between human ratings and estimated ratings. Despite its simple form, RbRL has various hyperparameters and can be sensitive to various factors. Therefore, it is critical to provide comprehensive experiments to understand the impact of various hyperparameters on the performance of RbRL. This paper is a work in progress, providing users some general guidelines on how to select hyperparameters in RbRL.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Task Reward Learning from Human Ratings

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-task loss mixing rating classification, regression, and learned uncertainty weights improves reward learning from ratings over a classification-only baseline in synthetic control tasks.

Pith tools