Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 36 references

TeNeS-v2: Enhancement for Real-Time and Finite Temperature Simulations of Quantum Many-Body Systems

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read TeNeS-v2 extends a tensor-network solver to real-time and finite-temperature simulations of two-dimensional quantum lattices.

desk verdict A solid, honest software paper: the real-time and finite-temperature modes work on the demonstrated examples, and the QMC benchmarks give the finite-T claim real teeth. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.07777 v1 pith:7U6ZFYAD submitted 2025-01-14 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.comp-ph

Yuichi Motoyama , Tsuyoshi Okubo , Kazuyoshi Yoshimi , Satoshi Morita , Tatsumi Aoyama , Takeo Kato , Naoki Kawashima This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.comp-ph
keywords tensornetworksiTPS/iPEPSreal-timeevolutionfinite-temperaturesimulationquantumspinmodelsbosonCTMRGSuzuki-Trotter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces TeNeS-v2, an open-source tensor-network program that adds real-time evolution and finite-temperature simulation to its existing ground-state solver for two-dimensional quantum lattice models. The new modes run inside the same iTPS/iPEPS framework, requiring only small input-file changes from the ground-state workflow. Finite-temperature calculations for the transverse-field Ising model are benchmarked against quantum Monte Carlo, and multi-site observables such as scalar chirality are supported. If the central claims hold, researchers can study dynamics and thermal properties of 2D spin and Bose models without writing tensor-network code themselves.

What carries the argument

The central object is the iTPS/iPEPS tensor network and its mixed-state generalization, the iTPO (infinite Tensor Product Operator), whose bond dimension $D$ controls accuracy. For finite temperature, the density matrix is evolved as $\rho(2\tau) = e^{-\tau H}\rho(0)e^{-\tau H}$ from $\beta = 0$, with simple-update truncation, and expectation values are contracted as a single-layer square-lattice tensor network via CTMRG with environment bond dimension $\chi$. This single-layer structure is what makes the thermal calculation computationally lighter than the double-layer contraction used for pure-state expectation values.

What would settle it

Run the finite-temperature mode on a small 2D spin model whose exact thermal density matrix is known, and check whether the computed energy density ever falls below the exact ground-state energy or whether a positive observable such as $\langle (S^z)^2\rangle$ becomes negative. If such unphysical values persist as the CTMRG bond dimension $\chi$ is increased without increasing the iTPO bond dimension $D$, then the single-layer iTPO representation itself, not just the contraction, is failing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that TeNeS-v2 reliably performs real-time and finite-temperature simulations of infinite two-dimensional quantum lattice systems using iTPS/iPEPS. Real-time evolution is obtained by replacing the imaginary-time step $\tau$ with $-it/\hbar$ in the same Suzuki-Trotter update procedure used for ground states, then measuring observables at chosen time intervals. Finite temperature is obtained by imaginary-time evolving a single-layer infinite Tensor Product Operator (iTPO) starting from the infinite-temperature identity state, with CTMRG supplying the environment; because the traced iTPO is a single-layer network rather than a double layer, the thermal calculation is cheaper than a pure-state calculation at the same bond dimension. The paper demonstrates finite-temperature energy density, specific heat, and magnetization of the transverse-field Ising model against quantum Monte Carlo, and the real-time magnetization of a quenched Ising model, while noting that growing entanglement limits real-time accuracy at fixed bond dimension.

Load-bearing premise

The finite-temperature mode assumes that a single-layer iTPO, truncated by simple update and contracted by CTMRG, can represent the thermal density matrix closely enough that computed expectation values stay physical; the paper itself notes positive semidefiniteness is not guaranteed and shows an unphysical singularity in a $D=4$ triangular-lattice calculation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Users can run ground-state, real-time, and finite-temperature calculations on the same 2D lattice models by changing one mode parameter, so dynamical and thermal studies no longer require separate codes.
  • For the transverse-field Ising model, thermal energy density, specific heat, and magnetization computed with $D=6$ or $D=10$ match quantum Monte Carlo results, so the method is a viable alternative where QMC sign problems appear.
  • Multi-site observable support makes quantities like scalar chirality directly accessible, enabling tensor-network study of non-coplanar magnetic phases on frustrated lattices.
  • Real-time simulations at small bond dimension can show artifacts such as energy jumps, but increasing $D$ removes them, giving users a concrete convergence check for dynamics.
  • Real-time accuracy at fixed bond dimension is limited to short times because entanglement grows during evolution, matching known behavior of iTPS/iPEPS dynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The single-layer iTPO approach could plausibly be applied to frustrated magnets or other 2D models where quantum Monte Carlo faces sign problems, but the positive-semidefiniteness caveat means users should validate results with energy bounds or independent methods.
  • A natural extension would be to add a purified, double-layer iTPO mode alongside the supported single-layer mode, since the paper notes the purified representation avoids unphysical densities at higher computational cost.
  • The observed $D=4$ scalar-chirality singularity in the triangular-lattice XXZ model suggests that the simple-update environment, rather than the iTPO representation alone, may be the limiting factor; testing against exact diagonalization on finite clusters would isolate the cause.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. TeNeS-v2 is a software paper for the open-source tensor-network solver TeNeS, which targets infinite two-dimensional quantum lattice systems using iTPS/iPEPS. The new version adds real-time evolution and finite-temperature simulation modes to the previously implemented ground-state solver. The real-time mode applies Suzuki-Trotter decomposition with simple and full updates and evaluates local observables along the trajectory. The finite-temperature mode represents the thermal density matrix as a single-layer iTPO, evolves it in imaginary time from the infinite-temperature identity state using the simple update, and contracts expectation values with CTMRG. The paper also introduces multi-site observables, exemplified by scalar chirality on the triangular lattice. Validation consists of finite-temperature energy, specific heat, and magnetization for the transverse-field Ising model compared with DSQSS quantum Monte Carlo, plus a real-time quench example checked through bond-dimension convergence and energy conservation. The manuscript explicitly discloses known limitations: iTPO positive semidefiniteness is not guaranteed, full update is not yet supported for iTPO, real-time simulations are limited by entanglement growth, and the triangular-lattice example shows an unphysical singularity at D=4 attributed to the simple update.

Significance. If the claims hold, TeNeS-v2 is a useful community resource: it provides an accessible, open-source implementation of real-time and finite-temperature iTPS/iPEPS simulations, with reproducible example data and scripts in an ISSP repository. The finite-temperature mode is benchmarked against an independent method, DSQSS QMC, and the agreement at D=6 and D=10 for the transverse-field Ising model is genuine evidence that the implementation works for that model. The complexity analysis (single-layer contraction with O(D^6) cost when chi is proportional to D) is also helpful for users. The central software-capability claim is therefore supported for the demonstrated cases. The main weakness is the breadth of the validation: only one spin model is checked at finite temperature, no Bose-model benchmark is presented, and the real-time example relies on internal consistency checks rather than an external baseline. These caveats are, however, disclosed in the paper itself, including the explicit warning in Sec. 3.2 that iTPO may violate positive semidefiniteness. I do not see a hidden technical flaw, but the abstract and conclusion should be aligned with the narrower demonstrated scope.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 6] The phrase 'demonstrating TeNeS-v2's applicability to various quantum spin and Bose models' is broader than the evidence presented: the finite-temperature benchmark covers only the transverse-field Ising model and no Bose model is used in any new-feature example. Please either add an additional benchmark (for example, a hardcore-boson or Heisenberg model at finite temperature) or qualify the scope in the abstract and conclusion, for instance by saying 'spin and boson models with short-range interactions' while noting that the demonstrated examples are spin models.
  2. [Sec. 5.2, footnote 2] The footnote reporting that for hx=0 a large deviation occurs when D increases above D=2 is potentially confusing and is stated without explanation. Since the main text recommends checking bond-dimension convergence, this example shows that larger D does not always improve accuracy. Please add a short explanation or a forward reference, and give concrete advice on how a user should choose D for a new model.
  3. [Sec. 5.1, Figs. 4 and 5] The real-time demonstration uses bond-dimension dependence and energy conservation as accuracy diagnostics, but no quantitative tolerance is given. Reporting the maximum energy drift or the norm error after truncation would make the example more reproducible and would clarify what 'the discontinuity disappears' means quantitatively.
  4. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (9)] The statement that the step size tau in the imaginary-time evolution operator corresponds to 2tau in the actual inverse-temperature step is correct but could be made more explicit. I suggest writing the cumulative relation beta = 2 N tau for N evolution steps and stating clearly in the FT output-file description that the first column is beta, not the number of steps.
  5. [Program Summary and references] There are several minor presentation issues: 'di fficult' appears in the Program Summary; the rendering 'T eNeS' is inconsistent in the abstract and body; reference [21] contains an incorrectly rendered exponent 'm = 1 2'; and in Fig. 4 the panel labels (a) and (b) are placed at inconsistent positions. These do not affect the technical content.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the new-mode software claims are supported by an independent QMC benchmark and the key approximation limitations are disclosed.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a software-capability claim: TeNeS-v2 implements real-time evolution and finite-temperature iTPO/iTPS simulations. The algorithmic derivation in Sec. 3 is standard Suzuki-Trotter time evolution with simple/full updates and CTMRG contraction; no parameter is fitted to the results that are then reported as validations. The finite-temperature benchmark in Sec. 5.2 compares TeNeS-v2 output against QMC results from DSQSS. Although DSQSS is cited from overlapping authors, it is an independent stochastic method with its own published implementation, so the comparison is an external check rather than an input to the algorithm. The paper also explicitly discloses the known limitation that iTPO does not guarantee positive semidefiniteness of the density matrix (Sec. 3.2) and shows an unphysical chirality singularity at D=4 (Sec. 5.3), attributing it to the simple-update approximation; this is a disclosed limitation, not a circular derivation. The abstract's phrase 'various quantum spin and Bose models' is broader than the demonstrated benchmarks: only one spin model is compared against QMC and no Bose-model example is shown. That is an overstatement of scope, but it is not circularity. No load-bearing step reduces by definition to its own input, and no fitted input is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the tensor-network ansatz, Suzuki-Trotter decomposition, and the accuracy of simple update plus CTMRG contraction. No new physical entities are introduced, and the numerical parameters D, chi, and tau are user-set accuracy controls rather than fitted physical constants.

free parameters (3)
  • Bond dimension D of iTPS/iTPO = D = 3, 6, 10 in examples
    User-chosen truncation parameter controlling accuracy; not fitted to data. Section 5 demonstrates D-dependence.
  • CTMRG bond dimension chi = chi = 16 in Sec. 5.2
    User-set boundary bond dimension for the corner transfer matrix contraction.
  • Trotter time step tau = e.g., tau = [0.01, 0.005, 0.05] schedules
    User-set step size in the Suzuki-Trotter decomposition; convergence is shown indirectly via D-dependence.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Suzuki-Trotter decomposition is valid for the small time steps used in real- and imaginary-time evolution.
    Used in Eq. (2) and Sec. 3.1 to factor the time evolution operator into two-body gates with O(tau) error.
  • domain assumption The iTPS/iTPO tensor network with finite bond dimension D can represent the states of interest well enough for the targeted accuracy.
    Central approximation of the method; Secs. 1 and 3.2 assume area-law entanglement for low-energy states and that truncation to D controls accuracy.
  • domain assumption CTMRG and simple-update contractions give sufficiently accurate expectation values for the single-layer iTPO network.
    Sec. 3.2 states finite-T uses only simple update and CTMRG; the examples rely on this convergence.
  • domain assumption The simulated models (transverse-field Ising, triangular-lattice XXZ) are representative of the claimed range of applicability.
    Validation is limited to these models; the abstract claims broad applicability to spin and Bose models on 2D lattices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TeNeS-v2: Enhancement for Real-Time and Finite Temperature Simulations of Quantum Many-Body Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7U6ZFYAD

@misc{pith2026250107777,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TeNeS-v2: Enhancement for Real-Time and Finite Temperature Simulations of Quantum Many-Body Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7U6ZFYAD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.07777}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum many-body systems are challenging targets for computational physics due to their large degrees of freedom. The tensor networks, particularly Tensor Product States (TPS) and Projected Entangled Pair States (PEPS), effectively represent these systems on two-dimensional lattices. However, the technical complexity of TPS/PEPS-based coding is often too much for researchers to handle. To reduce this problem, we developed TeNeS (Tensor Network Solver). This paper introduces TeNeS-v2, which extends TeNeS with real-time and finite temperature simulations, providing deeper insights into quantum many-body systems. We detail the new algorithms, input/output design, and application examples, demonstrating TeNeS-v2's applicability to various quantum spin and Bose models on two-dimensional lattices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.07777 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Single layer structure of the trace of iTPO. (b) Double [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Corner transfer matrix representation of the single layer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. This is due to the increase of the quantum en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Real-time evolution calculations of the energy on the Ising [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Real-time evolution calculations of the Ising model with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The energy density at hx = 2.0 obtained by finite temper￾ature calculations for D = 2, 6 and 10 is shown as a function of the temperature. For comparison, the results obtained by the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) method are also shown by filled circle symbols. The solid li…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The results of finite temperature calculations for the Ising [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Scalar chirality density of the antiferromagnetic XY model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Or ´us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Annals of Physics 349 (2014) 117–158

    R. Or ´us, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Annals of Physics 349 (2014) 117–158. doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.aop.2014.06.013

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Or ´us, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, Na- ture Reviews Physics 1 (9) (2019) 538–550

    R. Or ´us, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, Na- ture Reviews Physics 1 (9) (2019) 538–550. doi:10.1038/ s42254-019-0086-7

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Eisert, M

    J. Eisert, M. Cramer, M. B. Plenio, Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 277–306. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.277

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.277 2010

  4. [4]

    Nishino, Y

    T. Nishino, Y . Hieida, K. Okunishi, N. Maeshima, Y . Akutsu, A. Gendiar, Two-Dimensional Tensor Product Variational For- mulation, Progress of Theoretical Physics 105 (3) (2001) 409–

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Verstraete, J

    F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, Renormalization algorithms for quantum-many body systems in two and higher dimensions (2004). arXiv:cond-mat/0407066

    arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    Corboz, F

    P. Corboz, F. Mila, Tensor network study of the Shastry- Sutherland model in zero magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 115144. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.115144

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.115144 2013

  7. [7]

    Okubo, K

    T. Okubo, K. Shinjo, Y . Yamaji, N. Kawashima, S. Sota, T. To- hyama, M. Imada, Ground-state properties of na 2iro3 deter- mined from an ab initio Hamiltonian and its extensions contain- ing Kitaev and extended Heisenberg interactions, Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 054434. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.054434

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.054434 2017

  8. [8]

    H. J. Liao, Z. Y . Xie, J. Chen, Z. Y . Liu, H. D. Xie, R. Z. Huang, B. Normand, T. Xiang, Gapless spin-liquid ground state in the s = 1/2 kagome antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 137202. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.137202

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.137202 2017

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    H.-Y . Lee, R. Kaneko, T. Okubo, N. Kawashima, Gapless kitaev spin liquid to classical string gas through tensor networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 087203. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 123.087203

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    H.-Y . Lee, N. Kawashima, Y . B. Kim, Tensor network wave function of s =1 kitaev spin liquids, Physical Review Research 2 (3) (Aug. 2020). doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2. 033318

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Mashiko, T

    T. Mashiko, T. Okubo, Quantum phase transition between spin liquid and spin nematics in spin-1 kitaev honeycomb model, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) 033110. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.6.033110

    2024

  4. [12]

    Corboz, T

    P. Corboz, T. M. Rice, M. Troyer, Competing states in the t- j model: Uniform d-wave state versus stripe state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 046402. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113. 046402

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    Corboz, F

    P. Corboz, F. Mila, Crystals of bound states in the magnetization plateaus of the shastry-sutherland model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 147203. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.147203

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    Czarnik, J

    P. Czarnik, J. Dziarmaga, P. Corboz, Time evolution of an infi- nite projected entangled pair state: An efficient algorithm, Phys- ical Review B 99 (3) (Jan. 2019). doi:10.1103/physrevb. 99.035115

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    Hubig, A

    C. Hubig, A. Bohrdt, M. Knap, F. Grusdt, J. I. Cirac, Eval- uation of time-dependent correlators after a local quench in iPEPS: hole motion in the t-J model, SciPost Phys. 8 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Kaneko, I

    R. Kaneko, I. Danshita, Tensor-network study of correlation- spreading dynamics in the two-dimensional bose-hubbard model, Communications Physics 5 (1) (2022) 65. doi:10. 1038/s42005-022-00848-9

    2022

  9. [17]

    R. T. Ponnaganti, M. Mambrini, D. Poilblanc, Tensor network variational optimizations for real-time dynamics: Application to 9 the time-evolution of spin liquids, SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) 158. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.4.158

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    Ponsioen, P

    B. Ponsioen, P. Corboz, Excitations with projected entangled pair states using the corner transfer matrix method, Phys. Rev. B 101 (19) (2020) 195109. arXiv:2001.02645, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.101.195109

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    W.-L. Tu, L. Vanderstraeten, N. Schuch, H.-Y . Lee, N. Kawashima, J.-Y . Chen, Generating function for projected entangled-pair states, PRX Quantum 5 (2024) 010335. doi: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.010335

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    Kshetrimayum, M

    A. Kshetrimayum, M. Rizzi, J. Eisert, R. Or ´us, Tensor net- work annealing algorithm for two-dimensional thermal states, Physical Review Letters 122 (7) (Feb. 2019). doi:10.1103/ physrevlett.122.070502

    2019

  13. [21]

    doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.2.021

    doi

  14. [22]

    J. L. Jim ´enez, S. P. G. Crone, E. Fogh, M. E. Zayed, R. Lortz, E. Pomjakushina, K. Conder, A. M. L¨auchli, L. Weber, S. Wes- sel, A. Honecker, B. Normand, C. R ¨uegg, P. Corboz, H. M. Rønnow, F. Mila, A quantum magnetic analogue to the criti- cal point of water, Nature 592 (...

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Czarnik, M

    P. Czarnik, M. M. Rams, P. Corboz, J. Dziarmaga, Tensor net- work study of the m = 1 2 magnetization plateau in the shastry- sutherland model at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) 075113. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.075113

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    https://www.pasums.issp.u-tokyo.ac.jp/tenes/en

  17. [25]

    https://github.com/issp-center-dev/TeNeS

  18. [26]

    Or ´us, G

    R. Or ´us, G. Vidal, Simulation of two-dimensional quantum systems on an infinite lattice revisited: Corner transfer matrix for tensor contraction, Physical Review B 80 (9) (Sep. 2009). doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.094403

    2009 doi

  19. [27]

    Motoyama, T

    Y . Motoyama, T. Okubo, K. Yoshimi, S. Morita, T. Kato, N. Kawashima, TeNeS: Tensor network solver for quantum lat- tice systems, Computer Physics Communications 279 (2022) 108437. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108437

    2022

  20. [28]

    Jordan, R

    J. Jordan, R. Or ´us, G. Vidal, F. Verstraete, J. I. Cirac, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in two spa- tial dimensions, Physical Review Letters 101 (25) (Dec. 2008). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.250602

    2008 doi

  21. [29]

    H. C. Jiang, Z. Y . Weng, T. Xiang, Accurate determination of tensor network state of quantum lattice models in two dimen- sions, Physical Review Letters 101 (9) (Aug. 2008). doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.101.090603

    2008 doi

  22. [30]

    https://isspns-gitlab.issp.u-tokyo.ac.jp/ tenes-dev/tenes-gallery

  23. [31]

    H. N. Phien, J. A. Bengua, H. D. Tuan, P. Corboz, R. Or ´us, Infinite projected entangled pair states algorithm improved: Fast full update and gauge fixing, Physical Review B 92 (3) (Jul. 2015). doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.035142

    2015 doi

  24. [32]

    Yamamoto, G

    D. Yamamoto, G. Marmorini, I. Danshita, Quantum phase dia- gram of the triangular-lattice XXZ model in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (12) (2014) 127203. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.112.127203

    2014

  25. [33]

    Motoyama, K

    Y . Motoyama, K. Yoshimi, A. Masaki-Kato, T. Kato, N. Kawashima, Dsqss: Discrete space quantum systems solver, Computer Physics Communications 264 (2021) 107944. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107944

    2021

  26. [34]

    Motoyama, K

    Y . Motoyama, K. Yoshimi, T. Kato, S. Todo, Materiapps live! and materiapps installer: Environment for starting and scaling up materials science simulations, SoftwareX 20 (2022) 101210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101210. 10

    2022

  27. [35]

    Sellmann, X.-F

    D. Sellmann, X.-F. Zhang, S. Eggert, Phase diagram of the antiferromagnetic XXZ model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 91 (8) (2015) 081104. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.91.081104

    2015

  28. [417]

    doi:10.1143/PTP.105.409

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.