Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 33 references

LLM-Ehnanced Holonic Architecture for Ad-Hoc Scalable SoS

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a three-layer holonic architecture—reasoning, communication, capabilities—with large language models as the reasoning core of every holon, and adds supervisor, planner, task, and resource holons so that systems of…

desk verdict A clear conceptual architecture for LLM-driven holons whose central real-time claim is unverified; readable, honest, but too thin on evidence for acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.07992 v1 pith:LXEEULCR submitted 2025-01-14 cs.AI cs.ETcs.MAcs.SE

Muhammad Ashfaq , Ahmed R. Sadik , Tommi Mikkonen , Muhammad Waseem , Niko Mäkitalo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AIcs.ETcs.MAcs.SE
keywords systemofsystemsholonicarchitecturelargelanguagemodelsself-adaptiveinteroperabilityreconfigurabilityhuman-systeminteraction3Dmobility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the standard holonic way of building systems of systems can be upgraded by giving each holon a three-layer structure—reasoning, communication, and capabilities—and by placing a large language model at the centre of the reasoning layer. It introduces four specialised holons drawn from intelligent manufacturing—supervisor, planner, task, and resource—to coordinate heterogeneous, often black-box constituent systems at runtime. The authors claim this combination improves interoperability, reconfigurability, and human-system interaction in self-adaptive systems of systems, and they illustrate it with a 3D mobility scenario in which ground and aerial vehicles plan and execute multimodal trips for a passenger. A reader should care because modern systems of systems such as urban transport must absorb unknown systems at runtime and accept instructions from non-experts, and the paper offers a concrete architectural design for making that possible.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the holon, defined as a semi-autonomous unit that is simultaneously a whole and a part of a larger whole. The machinery is the three-layer holon: a reasoning layer whose core is a large language model (command processing, context management, decision making), a communication layer that translates the LLM's action plans into executable commands through a robotics middleware and routes messages between holons, and a capabilities layer that wraps the constituent system's resources. Around this core sit four specialised holon roles—supervisor, planner, task, and resource—each given role-specific prompt context, with the human resource holon providing the natural-language interface for people. The same machinery also does dual-level planning: a supervisor-level plan is decomposed into task holons and sub-plans, so local changes can be handled without restarting the global mission.

What would settle it

Take the paper's own 3D mobility scenario and inject a road closure after a task holon has committed to a route; if the LLM's replanning exceeds the response-time budget or yields an action plan the vehicle cannot execute, with no non-LLM fallback catching the error, then the claimed real-time adaptability is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that specialised holons—supervisor, planner, task, and resource—use large language models within their reasoning layers to support decision-making and ensure real-time adaptability, and that the layered holon design lets each holon adapt autonomously to environmental changes while keeping behaviour coherent across the whole system of systems. The reasoning layer gives every holon the same three-part routine: preprocess an incoming command, build a context-aware prompt, and produce an action plan that the communication layer turns into concrete commands for the capabilities layer. This is presented as the first introduction of manufacturing-style specialised holons in the system-of-systems context, and the 3D mobility case study is the demonstration: a passenger's natural-language request is refined by a supervisor holon, split into driving and flying task holons, and executed by resource holons representing vehicles.

Load-bearing premise

The whole design collapses unless a large language model can reliably reason in real time—returning correct action plans quickly enough for moving vehicles—and unless unknown third-party systems can be wrapped into the holon's three layers without their vendors' cooperation; both are stated but not yet shown by measurement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Heterogeneous, black-box constituent systems can be brought into the system of systems at runtime by wrapping each in the same holon facade, since the LLM interprets commands and the communication layer standardises how capabilities are invoked.
  • A supervisor holon can produce a high-level plan while task holons locally replan sub-segments, so resource reallocation—for example, switching from vehicle $m_1$ to $m_3$ for a later leg—happens without rebuilding the whole mission.
  • Human operators and customers can interact through natural language via the human resource holon, lowering the technical expertise needed to monitor or redirect the system of systems.
  • The architecture avoids a single central controller, preserving the holonic paradigm's scalability while adding structure through specialised holon roles.
  • The proposed metrics—scalability, adaptability, resource utilisation, response time, and user satisfaction—give an intended comparison against holonic architectures without LLMs and specialised holons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The decisive experiment is to stress the LLM reasoning core with injected failures and measure whether task holons detect and replan within the latency a moving vehicle tolerates; that would turn the architecture's central premise into evidence.
  • Because all four holon roles share the same LLM core, an error in one holon's context management could propagate as contradictory plans across the holarchy; adding a lightweight validation step for each generated action plan would test this.
  • The architecture's promise extends beyond transportation: any system of systems with black-box components and human operators—emergency response, logistics, manufacturing cells—could adopt the same specialised holon roles and natural-language interface.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a layered holonic architecture for system of systems, in which each holon is decomposed into reasoning, communication, and capabilities layers, and introduces four specialized holon roles (supervisor, planner, task, resource) that use LLMs for decision-making. The architecture is illustrated with a 3D mobility scenario involving UGVs and UAVs for passenger transport, and the paper proposes evaluation metrics for future empirical work. The paper explicitly identifies itself as a conceptual framework and states that implementation and evaluation are future work.

Significance. If the architecture worked as claimed, it would advance the state of the art in holonic SoS architectures by adding LLM-based reasoning to holons and by importing manufacturing-inspired specialized holon roles into the SoS domain. The layered decomposition is clearly described, the figures and sequence diagram are helpful, and the paper is transparent about the lack of implementation. The main advertised benefits, especially "real-time adaptability," however, rest on unverified assumptions about LLM reliability and latency, and the case study provides no empirical evidence.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1 / Section 5] The claim that the reasoning layer "ensures real-time adaptability" (abstract and Section 5) is not supported by any measurement, simulation, or feasibility argument. Section 6.1 proposes a fine-tuned GPT-3 for the reasoning layer, whose generation latency is nondeterministic and can exceed the control-loop intervals of UGVs/UAVs, yet no latency bound, timeout, or degraded-mode fallback is specified. Section 6.2 lists response time only as a future metric. Because the LLM is the "central reasoning core" of every holon, this unverified premise is load-bearing for the paper's central contribution.
  2. [Section 4] The case study is a narrative description with figures and a sequence diagram, not a demonstration. No simulation, prototype, or quantitative data are presented, so the claims in Section 5 about dynamic adjustment, resource reallocation, and improved interoperability are not evidenced. Section 6 explicitly states that this is a conceptual framework and that implementation in a simulated environment is future work, which means the paper's stated benefits are currently unsupported.
  3. [Section 3.1 / Section 1] The architecture assumes that heterogeneous black-box CS, which are "unknown at design time" (Section 1), can be wrapped into a uniform three-layer, ROS-based holon facade without vendor cooperation. No mechanism is described for generating the interface, protocol, or capability descriptions needed by the communication layer to invoke black-box CS capabilities. This assumption is load-bearing for the interoperability claim and is not substantiated in the paper.
  4. [Section 5] The assertion that this work is "the first to introduce" specialized holons in the SoS context is not supported by a systematic comparison. The cited ontological holonic architectures in [7] and [20] already represent CS as holons with roles and dynamic composition, so the novelty should be scoped more carefully, for example by focusing specifically on the LLM-enhanced reasoning layer rather than on the specialized holon roles per se.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title / Abstract] The arXiv title contains a typo: "LLM-Ehnanced" should be "LLM-Enhanced."
  2. [Section 4.2] Terminology is inconsistent: Section 3.2 introduces "Planner Holon" and "Supervisor Holon," but Section 4.2 later refers to "Plan Holons" and "Supervise Holons." Please unify the terminology.
  3. [Section 4.2] Notation such as "S-SoS", "S-CS1", "c1", "m1", "Pa", "Ta1", and sub-plan identifiers is introduced without definitions, making the sequence diagram and text difficult to follow.
  4. [Section 6.2] The proposed evaluation metrics are listed but not operationalized; for example, "adaptability" and "user satisfaction" need concrete measurement procedures and comparison baselines.
  5. [Section 3.2] The phrase "Human Resource Holon ... encapsulates humans as holistic entities" is vague. The paper should clarify how user intent, goals, and status are captured, and how consent and privacy are handled.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No equations, fits, or empirical predictions; self-citations are non-load-bearing, so no circularity.

full rationale

This is a conceptual architecture paper. There are no equations, fitted parameters, or empirical predictions, so the reduction-to-fit patterns (self-definitional claims, fitted inputs called predictions) do not apply. The closest to a derivation chain is the Section 5 assertion that the reasoning layer 'provides consistent reasoning capabilities, enabling each holon to adapt autonomously to environmental changes while maintaining coherent behaviour across the system.' That is a design claim, not a result derived from the architecture's definitions, and Section 6 explicitly defers evaluation: 'This study presents a conceptual framework, and we recognise the importance of evaluating its effectiveness through experimentation.' The paper cites its own ICSOFT 2024 predecessor [2] as the origin of the NLP concept and Sadik et al. [23] as a future simulation evaluation approach, but neither citation carries the load of the paper's main contribution; both are disclosed as prior or planned work rather than as externally forced premises. The specialized-holon taxonomy is attributed to external manufacturing work [13], and the claimed SoS novelty is a positioning statement, not a circular derivation. No equation, theorem, fitted value, or benchmark result is equivalent by construction to an output. Any concern about unverified LLM real-time reliability belongs to correctness/verification risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper contains no fitted numeric parameters: its commitments are structural, so free_parameters is empty. The load-bearing premises are assumptions about LLM reliability and about the wrappability of heterogeneous black-box systems behind a uniform ROS/LLM facade. The genuinely new entities (human resource holon, specialized roles in the SoS context) have no independent evidence. The counts here show that the paper's contribution is an untested design hypothesis resting on two unverified domain assumptions.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption An LLM in every holon's reasoning layer reliably interprets heterogeneous commands and produces correct, executable plans with latency acceptable for real-time operation (Sections 3.1, 5).
    The central value of the architecture depends on LLM correctness and speed, yet Section 6.2 lists response time as a metric for future work and no reliability data are given. Known LLM failure modes (hallucination, parse errors, latency) are not analyzed.
  • domain assumption Heterogeneous, black-box constituent systems, unknown at design time, can be encapsulated at runtime into a uniform three-layer holon with ROS-based communication and an LLM reasoning facade (Sections 1, 3.1).
    Section 1 motivates the paper with highly heterogeneous CS with differing protocols, data formats, and interfaces; Section 3.1 assumes a standard communication layer built on ROS for all holons. How black-box CS are wrapped without vendor-supplied interfaces is not addressed.
  • ad hoc to paper A human can be represented as a 'human resource holon' whose LLM interface faithfully captures user intent, goals, and status (Section 3.2).
    Modeling humans as encapsulated holon entities is introduced by this paper via the Human Resource Holon; no evidence is given that LLM-mediated intent capture is faithful or safe.
invented entities (2)
  • Human Resource Holon (encapsulates humans with an LLM natural-language interface)
    purpose: Lets non-expert humans (customers, operators) interact with the SoS in natural language and be represented as first-class system resources (Section 3.2; used as passenger holon c1 in Section 4.2).
    No implementation, user study, or falsifiable handle is provided; the interaction model's value is asserted.
  • Specialized holon roles (supervisor, planner, task, resource) transplanted from manufacturing into the SoS context
    purpose: Role separation intended to improve adaptability, reconfigurability, and resource allocation (Sections 3.2, 5).
    Section 5 claims this is the first use in SoS; the roles themselves come from ADACOR [13]. Whether the separation actually improves SoS properties is untested.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of LLM-Ehnanced Holonic Architecture for Ad-Hoc Scalable SoS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LXEEULCR

@misc{pith2026250107992,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: LLM-Ehnanced Holonic Architecture for Ad-Hoc Scalable SoS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LXEEULCR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.07992}
}
read the original abstract

As modern system of systems (SoS) become increasingly adaptive and human centred, traditional architectures often struggle to support interoperability, reconfigurability, and effective human system interaction. This paper addresses these challenges by advancing the state of the art holonic architecture for SoS, offering two main contributions to support these adaptive needs. First, we propose a layered architecture for holons, which includes reasoning, communication, and capabilities layers. This design facilitates seamless interoperability among heterogeneous constituent systems by improving data exchange and integration. Second, inspired by principles of intelligent manufacturing, we introduce specialised holons namely, supervisor, planner, task, and resource holons aimed at enhancing the adaptability and reconfigurability of SoS. These specialised holons utilise large language models within their reasoning layers to support decision making and ensure real time adaptability. We demonstrate our approach through a 3D mobility case study focused on smart city transportation, showcasing its potential for managing complex, multimodal SoS environments. Additionally, we propose evaluation methods to assess the architecture efficiency and scalability,laying the groundwork for future empirical validations through simulations and real world implementations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.07992 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Layered structure of a holon showing the hierarchical relationship between rea￾soning, communication, and capabilities layers, with their respective sub-components and interactions. Communication Layer: This layer translates LLM instructions into concrete and actionable commands for the holon, enabling capability control. It consists of three sub-components: 1. Execution Control: Implements instructions from the rea… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Specialised holons and the workflow relationships among them. Planner Holon: This holon translates the broad objectives of the supervisor holon into specific tasks. It develops detailed task plans from high-level goals, maintains a comprehensive overview of current tasks and resources, and opti￾mises resource allocation across plans. Task Holon: This holon oversees individual task execution with real-time adaptabili… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. 3D Mobility Holonic Architecture for coordinating air and ground transport resources in urban environments. Output: The supervisor holons collaborate to develop an overarching plan, P a, to fulfil the c1 ’s transportation request. Plan Pa consists of three sequential task holons: Ta1 (driving), Ta2 (flying), and Ta3 (driving), covering the journey across multiple transportation modes. Each task holon can be further … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sequence diagram of the 3D Mobility SoS, illustrating task coordination from user request to plan execution across transport modes. 5 Discussion Our proposed layered architecture for holons differs from the current state-of￾the-art, which typically represents holons as…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [7]

    Future Generation Computer Systems157, 499–515 (2024)

    Elhabbash, A., Elkhatib, Y., Nundloll, V., Marco, V.S., Blair, G.S.: Principled and automated system of systems composition using an ontological architecture. Future Generation Computer Systems157, 499–515 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [20]

    In: IEEE International Conference on Informatics, IoT, and Enabling Technologies

    Nundloll, V., Elkhatib, Y., Elhabbash, A., Blair, G.S.: An ontological framework for opportunistic composition of iot systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Informatics, IoT, and Enabling Technologies. pp. 614–621. IEEE (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [1]

    In: 1st IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems En- gineering

    Abbott, R.: Open at the top; open at the bottom; and continually (but slowly) evolving. In: 1st IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems En- gineering. pp. 1–6. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [2]

    In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Technologies

    Ashfaq, M., Sadik, A.R., Mikkonen, T., Waseem, M., Mäkitalo, N.: Enhancing holonic architecture with natural language processing for system of systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Technologies. pp. 427–433. SciTePress (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [3]

    In: Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Adaptive and Reflective Middleware

    Blair, G.S., Bromberg, Y., Coulson, G., Elkhatib, Y., Réveillère, L., Ribeiro, H.B., Rivière, E., Taïani, F.: Holons: towards a systematic approach to composing sys- tems of systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Adaptive and Reflective Middleware. pp. 5:1–5:6. ACM (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [4]

    In: 1st IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering

    Boardman, J.T., Sauser, B.J.: System of systems – the meaning of of. In: 1st IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering. pp. 118–

    work page

  7. [5]

    In: Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M., Lin, H

    Brown, T.B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Nee- lakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D.M., Wu, J., Win- ter, C., Hesse, C., Chen, M., Sigler, E., Litwin, M., Gray, S., Chess, B., Clark, J., Berner, C., McCandlish, S., Radford...

    work page 2020

  8. [6]

    Systems of Systems Engineering for NATO Defence Applications (STO-EN-SCI-276) pp

    Dahmann, J.S.: Systems of systems characterization and types. Systems of Systems Engineering for NATO Defence Applications (STO-EN-SCI-276) pp. 1–14 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 33 references
  1. [8]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the Conference on Systems Engineering Research

    Gideon, J., Dagli, C.H., Miller, A.K.: Taxonomy of systems-of-systems. In: Pro- ceedings of the Conference on Systems Engineering Research. pp. 356–363. IEEE (2005)

    2005

  2. [9]

    (ed.): Systems of Systems Engineering: Principles and Applications

    Jamshidi, M. (ed.): Systems of Systems Engineering: Principles and Applications. CRC Press, 1st edn. (2008)

    2008

  3. [10]

    Multimedia tools and applications82(3), 3713–3744 (2023)

    Khurana, D., Koli, A., Khatter, K., Singh, S.: Natural language processing: state of the art, current trends and challenges. Multimedia tools and applications82(3), 3713–3744 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    Macmillan (1968) 12

    Koestler, A.: The Ghost in the Machine. Macmillan (1968) 12

    1968

  5. [12]

    Software: Practice and Experience (2024)

    Koubaa, A., Ammar, A., Boulila, W.: Next-generation human-robot interaction with ChatGPT and robot operating system. Software: Practice and Experience (2024)

    2024

  6. [13]

    Computers in industry57(2), 121–130 (2006)

    Leitão, P., Restivo, F.: Adacor: A holonic architecture for agile and adaptive man- ufacturing control. Computers in industry57(2), 121–130 (2006)

    2006

  7. [14]

    In: Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction

    Levinson, L., Dietrich, M., Sarkisian, A., Sabanovic, S., Smart, W.D.: Privacy aware robotics. In: Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. pp. 1335–1337. ACM (2024)

    2024

  8. [15]

    In: Proceedings of the 2nd Inter- national Workshop on Smart

    Lopes, F., Loss, S., Mendes, A., Batista, T., Lea, R.: SoS-centric middleware ser- vices for interoperability in smart cities systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Inter- national Workshop on Smart. pp. 1–6. ACM (2016)

    2016

  9. [16]

    Systems Engineering: The Journal of the International Council on Systems Engineering1(4), 267–284 (1998)

    Maier, M.W.: Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. Systems Engineering: The Journal of the International Council on Systems Engineering1(4), 267–284 (1998)

    1998

  10. [17]

    In: International Conference on Advanced Aspects of Software Engineering

    Nadira, B., Bouanaka, C., Bendjaballah, M., Djarri, A.: Towards an UML-based SoS analysis and design process. In: International Conference on Advanced Aspects of Software Engineering. pp. 1–8. IEEE (2020)

    2020

  11. [18]

    In: IEEE/ACM 39th International Confer- ence on Software Engineering Companion

    Neto, V.V.G.: A model-based approach towards the building of trustworthy software-intensive systems-of-systems. In: IEEE/ACM 39th International Confer- ence on Software Engineering Companion. pp. 425–428. IEEE (2017)

    2017

  12. [19]

    ACM Computing Surveys48(2), 1–41 (2015)

    Nielsen, C.B., Larsen, P.G., Fitzgerald, J., Woodcock, J., Peleska, J.: Systems of systems engineering: basic concepts, model-based techniques, and research direc- tions. ACM Computing Surveys48(2), 1–41 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    https://cdn.openai.com/ better-language-models/language_models_are_unsupervised_multitask_ learners.pdf (2018), last accessed 2024/11/06

    Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., Sutskever, I.: Lan- guage models are unsupervised multitask learners. https://cdn.openai.com/ better-language-models/language_models_are_unsupervised_multitask_ learners.pdf (2018), last accessed 2024/11/06

    2018

  14. [22]

    In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Business

    Rousi, R., Samani, H., Mäkitalo, N., Vakkuri, V., Linkola, S., Kemell, K.K., Daubaris, P., Fronza, I., Mikkonen, T., Abrahamsson, P.: Business and ethical concerns in domestic conversational generative AI-empowered multi-robot systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th International...

    2023

  15. [23]

    In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Metaheuristics & Swarm Intelligence

    Sadik, A.R., Bolder, B., Subasic, P.: A self-adaptive system of systems architecture to enable its ad-hoc scalability: unmanned vehicle fleet-mission control center case study. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Metaheuristics & Swarm I...

    2023

  16. [24]

    CoRR abs/2306.00597 (2023)

    Sadik, A.R., Ceravola, A., Joublin, F., Patra, J.: Analysis of chatgpt on source code. CoRR abs/2306.00597 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Future Internet9(3), 35 (2017)

    Sadik, A.R., Urban, B.: Combining adaptive holonic control and isa-95 architec- tures to self-organize the interaction in a worker-industrial robot cooperative work- cell. Future Internet9(3), 35 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Science of Computer Programming 192, 102425 (2020)

    Silva, E., Batista, T., Oquendo, F.: On the verification of mission-related properties in software-intensive systems-of-systems architectural design. Science of Computer Programming 192, 102425 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Information and Software Technology147, 106904 (2022) 13

    Song, J., Kang, J., Hyun, S., Jee, E., Bae, D.H.: Continuous verification of sys- tem of systems with collaborative MAPE-K pattern and probability model slicing. Information and Software Technology147, 106904 (2022) 13

    2022

  20. [28]

    Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence90, 103503 (2020)

    Tchappi, I.H., Galland, S., Kamla, V.C., Kamgang, J.C., Mualla, Y., Najjar, A., Hilaire, V.: A critical review of the use of holonic paradigm in traffic and trans- portation systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence90, 103503 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    In: IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion

    Teixeira, P.G., Lebtag, B.G.A., Dos Santos, R.P., Fernandes, J., Mohsin, A., Kassab, M., Neto, V.V.G.: Constituent system design: A software architecture ap- proach. In: IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion. pp. 218–225. IEEE (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    In: IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops

    Wudka, B., Thomas, C., Siefke, L., Sommer, V.: A reconfiguration approach for open adaptive systems-of-systems. In: IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops. pp. 219–222. IEEE (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services

    Zhang, Z., Elkhatib, Y., Elhabbash, A.: NLP-based generation of ontological sys- tem descriptions for composition of smart home devices. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services. pp. 360–370. IEEE (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    CoRR abs/2303.18223 (2023) 14

    Zhao, W.X., Zhou, K., Li, J., Tang, T., Wang, X., Hou, Y., Min, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, J., Dong, Z., Du, Y., Yang, C., Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Jiang, J., Ren, R., Li, Y., Tang, X., Liu, Z., Liu, P., Nie, J., Wen, J.: A survey of large language models. CoRR abs/2303.18223 (2023) 14

    2023 arXiv

  25. [123]

    IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.