Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Towards Intelligent Active Particles

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Machine learning trained externally can give synthetic microswimmers navigation and collective foraging strategies that approach optimal behavior, even though the particles carry no onboard processors.

desk verdict A competent but selective review whose single-particle RL section is solid and whose collective-learning showcase rests on an unpublished preprint. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.08632 v1 pith:LKF46GAR submitted 2025-01-15 cond-mat.soft physics.bio-ph

Hartmut Löwen , Benno Liebchen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.bio-ph
keywords activemattermachinelearningreinforcementmicroswimmersnavigationcollectivebehaviorquorumsensingoptimalcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This book chapter argues that machine learning, applied externally to synthetic active particles, can give them a practical form of intelligence without onboard processors. It makes two central claims: reinforcement learning trained in different motility landscapes produces navigation strategies that closely approximate the exact fastest path, and groups of communicating agents trained with reinforcement learning can learn to balance following nutrient gradients against following each other's chemical signals, yielding clustering, adaptive, or spreading strategies. If true, these methods offer a route to steering microswimmers for tasks like targeted drug delivery and microplastic collection without embedding sensors and brains into each micron-sized particle.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the reinforcement learning loop wrapped around an active Brownian particle. The agent's action is the choice of self-propulsion direction; the reward is progress toward the target; training across randomized motility landscapes yields a policy whose trajectories approximate the optimal path, benchmarked against Dijkstra's algorithm. For the collective case, the machinery is a neural network that maps each agent's local nutrient concentration and signaling field to two coefficients, beta (chemotactic response to the nutrient gradient) and alpha (response to the signaling gradient), letting the group learn an optimal compromise between greedy foraging and quorum-sensing coordination. A second, sketched machinery is sparse regression on coarse-grained fields to learn governing hydrodynamic equations from trajectory data.

What would settle it

Implement the identical collective-learning setup with a fully specified nutrient field and quorum-sensing model: if the three learned strategies do not appear in the same regions of the agent-density versus consumption-rate plane shown in Figure 5, the chapter's central example fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The chapter's thesis is that the 'intelligence' of synthetic active particles can be supplied externally through machine learning. For a single agent in a prescribed motility landscape, where the particle controls direction but not speed, a Q-learning agent trained on many landscapes learns to choose directions that trace a path closely matching the exact optimal path computed by Dijkstra's algorithm, with the caveat that convergence to a global optimum is not guaranteed and on-policy methods reduce the risk of local optima. For groups, agents that sense local nutrient gradients and communicate via quorum-sensing molecules are trained with a neural network that outputs two coupling coefficients: how strongly to follow the nutrient gradient versus the gradient of signaling molecules. The learned behavior falls into three strategies, clustering, adaptive, and spreading, whose relative payoff depends on agent density and nutrient consumption rate, as summarized in a state diagram. The paper frames these results as evidence that machine learning can coordinate collective behavior toward a common goal.

Load-bearing premise

The chapter's showcase collective result rests entirely on a preprint that is listed as 'in preparation' with no public data, so that result cannot currently be independently checked.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single microswimmer can be steered through complex environments by an external controller that learned the environment type, without any onboard computation.
  • Learned group strategies can be selected by tuning agent density and consumption rate: clustering for cooperative foraging, spreading to avoid competition.
  • Because the learning happens in a computer, the same approach can be applied to particles too small to carry sensors or processors.
  • The methods extend to predator-prey training, where both predator and prey learn by self-play, and to learning coarse-grained equations for active matter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One can test whether the learned navigation policy transfers to motility landscapes unlike any seen in training; the chapter does not claim transfer, but the approach would only be useful if it does.
  • The collective state diagram suggests a design rule: for a given nutrient distribution and consumption rate, one can predict whether agents should be programmed to cluster, adapt, or spread, which could be used to engineer swarm behavior without per-agent training.
  • Because the showcase collective result rests on an unpublished preprint, a reproduction study with full model details would settle whether the three strategies are robust or an artifact of the specific signaling model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This book chapter reviews recent applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning to active matter systems, with emphasis on navigation and communication problems. The authors propose a seven-level hierarchy of 'intelligence' for active particles, from passive Brownian colloids to full sensor-processor-actuator robots, and then survey three application areas: single-agent navigation in motility landscapes (Section 2), predator-prey-like systems (Section 3), and collective learning in communicating agent groups (Section 4). The two showcase examples are a reinforcement-learning navigation strategy that approximates optimal paths, benchmarked against Dijkstra's algorithm, and a collective nutrient-collection task in which agents learn clustering, adaptive, or spreading strategies. The chapter concludes with a discussion of further applications, such as phase-transition identification and equation learning, and an outlook on the challenges of realizing autonomous intelligent microswimmers.

Significance. If the described results are reliable, the chapter offers a useful, accessible overview of a rapidly growing interdisciplinary field, with a clear conceptual taxonomy and a representative survey of methods. The single-agent navigation example is grounded in a published paper [52] that includes an explicit Dijkstra benchmark, and the review of phase-transition detection and data-driven equation learning cites peer-reviewed literature. The main weakness is that the chapter's most detailed and novel collective-learning example is drawn entirely from an unpublished, 'in preparation' preprint by the authors themselves [69]. This makes the central illustrative result externally unverifiable at present. The chapter's value would be substantially increased by replacing or substantiating this example with publicly available work or with sufficient algorithmic and quantitative detail.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, Figs. 3-5 and reference [69]] The collective-learning example that motivates the chapter's central claim—that machine learning can coordinate and direct collective behavior—is taken entirely from reference [69], cited as 'J. Grauer, H. Löwen, F. Schwarzendahl, B. Liebchen, Preprint, in preparation (2023)'. This manuscript is not publicly available, and the chapter provides no network architecture, hyperparameters, training details, or error bars for the results. The state diagram in Figure 5 is presented without the underlying quantitative comparison (e.g., no average nutrient-consumption values or statistical uncertainties), and the figures are explicitly attributed 'From ref. [69]' with no additional numerical support. As a result, the chapter's showcase collective-learning result cannot be independently checked. The authors should either cite a publicly posted version of [69] (with code or data) or include the algorithmic and quantitative details in an appendix.
  2. [Section 4, final paragraph] The statement that 'machine learning can be used to coordinate and direct collective behavior in a way that allows a group of agents to approach a common goal' is presented as a general conclusion, but it rests on a single, unpublished simulation study with a specific communication mechanism (quorum-sensing-like chemical gradients). This generalization exceeds the evidence provided. Please qualify the claim to indicate that it is a demonstration in a specific model system, not an established general result, and note whether independent replication has been attempted.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] There are several typographical errors, e.g., 'combing active matter' should be 'combining active matter' and 'artifical' should be 'artificial'.
  2. [Section 2] 'Exemplaric results' should be 'Exemplary results', and 'sucessfully' should be 'successfully'.
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The state diagram would benefit from a quantitative description of how the three strategies were classified, including the metric used to determine 'higher average nutrient consumption' and any error bars or statistical significance measures. Currently the caption only gives reduced axes and points to [69] for details.
  4. [References] Several entries are arXiv preprints without indication of publication status (e.g., [61], [67], [76], [78]). For a review chapter aimed at a broad readership, please clarify whether these have since been published, or keep them as preprints if they remain unpublished.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The chapter is a review with no derivation-to-input circularity, but Section 4's showcase collective-learning result rests entirely on an unpublished in-preparation preprint by the chapter's own authors.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 4, 'Artificial intelligence applied to groups of active particles', text around Figures 3-5 and reference [69]]
    "Let us now discuss a specific example where a group of communicating agents learns to cooperate in a way that enhances their nutrient consumption [69]. ... This leads to three qualitatively different motion patterns of the agents [69], which are shown in Figure 4. ... Figure 5 shows a state diagram ... See [69] for details. This exampleshows that machine learning can be used to coordinate and direct collective behavior in a way that allows a group of agents to approach a common goal."

    The chapter's most detailed and novel collective-learning conclusion, including the clustering/adaptive/spreading strategies and the state diagram in Figures 3-5, is drawn exclusively from reference [69]: 'J. Grauer, H. Löwen, F. Schwarzendahl, B. Liebchen, Preprint, in preparation (2023)'. This is an unpublished, not publicly available manuscript whose authors overlap with the present chapter. The chapter provides no equations, hyperparameters, training details, or data from which the result could be independently derived or checked. Thus the stated conclusion is not derived within the chapter or supported by an externally verifiable source; it is a load-bearing self-citation of unverified in-preparation work.

full rationale

This is a review-style book chapter, so the classic derivation-to-input circularity found in research papers is largely inapplicable. The single-agent navigation discussion in Section 2 is anchored in published work [52] by Monderkamp, Schwarzendahl, Klatt, and Löwen, and it explicitly benchmarks the learned trajectories against Dijkstra's algorithm, providing an independent optimal-path reference. Other sections summarize peer-reviewed literature on predator-prey systems, phase classification, and equation learning. The only notable circularity-adjacent issue is Section 4, where the showcase example of collectively learned nutrient-consumption strategies is taken entirely from reference [69], an in-preparation preprint by Grauer, Löwen, Schwarzendahl, and Liebchen. Because that preprint is unpublished and the chapter gives no algorithmic or numerical details, the section's headline claim currently rests on an unverifiable self-citation. However, this is a verifiability and provenance concern rather than a case where a prediction is equivalent to its inputs by construction. Apart from this, the chapter does not fit parameters and then rename them as predictions, nor does it smuggle in an ansatz via citation. The overall score is therefore low: the work is mostly a self-contained review of external literature, with one load-bearing self-citation of unpublished material in the collective-learning showcase.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters or entities are introduced. The reliance is on the cited literature, including an unpublished author-affiliated preprint [69], and on the chapter's own taxonomy.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The seven-level 'intelligence' classification (Fig. 1) is a faithful organizing scheme for the systems discussed.
    The chapter uses this ladder as the backbone for the review, but it is a pedagogical taxonomy rather than a derived result.
  • domain assumption The summarized papers, especially [52] and [69], are described accurately.
    The chapter does not re-derive simulation or experimental results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards Intelligent Active Particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LKF46GAR

@misc{pith2026250108632,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards Intelligent Active Particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LKF46GAR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.08632}
}
read the original abstract

In this book chapter we describe recent applications of artificial intelligence and in particular machine learning to active matter systems. Active matter is composed of agents, or particles, that are capable of propelling themselves. While biological agents like bacteria, fish or birds naturally possess a certain degree of "intelligence", synthetic active particles like colloidal microswimmers and electronic robots can be equipped with different levels of artificial intelligence, either internally (as for robots) or via a dynamic external control system. This book chapter briefly discusses existing approaches to make synthetic particles increasingly "intelligent" and then focuses on the usage of machine learning to approach navigation and communication problems of active particles. Basic questions are how to steer a single active agent through a complex environment to reach or discover a target in an optimal way and how active particles need to cooperate to efficiently collect a distribution of targets (e.g. nutrients or toxins) from their complex environment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08632 by the authors.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Panel a) shows a scenario where the particles cluster in a region of high [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Active Matter as a framework for living systems-inspired Robophysics

    cond-mat.soft 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Active-matter physics is presented as the organizing framework for robophysics, with robot swarms designed around local interactions, shared purpose, and adaptive feedback.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [69]

    Grauer, H

    J. Grauer, H. Löwen, F. Schwarzendahl, B. Liebchen, Preprint, in preparation (2023) Towards Intelligent Active Particles 15

    work page 2023

  2. [52]

    Monderkamp, F.J

    P.A. Monderkamp, F.J. Schwarzendahl, M.A. Klatt, H. Löwen, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol.3, 045024 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [1]

    Sagués Mestre,Colloidal Active Matter: Concepts, Experimental Realizations, and Models (CRC Press, 2022)

    F. Sagués Mestre,Colloidal Active Matter: Concepts, Experimental Realizations, and Models (CRC Press, 2022)

    2022

  4. [2]

    Cichos, K

    F. Cichos, K. Gustavsson, B. Mehlig, G. Volpe, Nat. Mach. Intell.2, 94 (2020)

    2020

  5. [3]

    88, 045006 (2016)

    C.Bechinger,R.DiLeonardo,H.Löwen,C.Reichhardt,G.Volpe,G.Volpe,Rev.Mod.Phys. 88, 045006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [4]

    Kaupp, L

    G.Gompper,R.G.Winkler,T.Speck,A.Solon,C.Nardini,F.Peruani,H.Löwen,R.Golesta- nian, U.B. Kaupp, L. Alvarez, J. Phys. Condens. Matter32, 193001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [5]

    Paxton, K.C

    W.F. Paxton, K.C. Kistler, C.C. Olmeda, A. Sen, S.K. St. Angelo, Y. Cao, T.E. Mallouk, P.E. Lammert, V.H. Crespi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.126, 13424 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [6]

    Nosenko, F

    V. Nosenko, F. Luoni, A. Kaouk, M. Rubin-Zuzic, H. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033226 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 82 references
  1. [7]

    Nasiri, H

    M. Nasiri, H. Löwen, B. Liebchen, EPL142, 17001 (2023)

    2023

  2. [8]

    Cichos, S.M

    F. Cichos, S.M. Landin, R. Pradip, inIntelligent Nanotechnology(Elsevier, 2023), p. 113

    2023

  3. [9]

    Yethiraj, Soft Matter3, 1099 (2007)

    A. Yethiraj, Soft Matter3, 1099 (2007)

    2007

  4. [10]

    Löwen, The European Physical Journal Special Topics222, 2727 (2013)

    H. Löwen, The European Physical Journal Special Topics222, 2727 (2013)

    2013

  5. [11]

    Liebchen, H

    B. Liebchen, H. Löwen, Acc. Chem. Res.51, 2982 (2018)

    2018

  6. [12]

    Lavergne, H

    F.A. Lavergne, H. Wendehenne, T. Bäuerle, C. Bechinger, Science364, 70 (2019)

    2019

  7. [13]

    Khadka, V

    U. Khadka, V. Holubec, H. Yang, F. Cichos, Nat. Commun.9, 3864 (2018)

    2018

  8. [14]

    Bäuerle, A

    T. Bäuerle, A. Fischer, T. Speck, C. Bechinger, Nat. Commun.9, 3232 (2018)

    2018

  9. [15]

    Sprenger, M.A

    A.R. Sprenger, M.A. Fernandez-Rodriguez, L. Alvarez, L. Isa, R. Wittkowski, H. Löwen, Langmuir 36, 7066 (2020)

    2020

  10. [16]

    Mijalkov, A

    M. Mijalkov, A. McDaniel, J. Wehr, G. Volpe, Phys. Rev. X6, 011008 (2016)

    2016

  11. [17]

    Patra, S

    D. Patra, S. Sengupta, W. Duan, H. Zhang, R. Pavlick, A. Sen, Nanoscale5(4), 1273 (2013)

    2013

  12. [18]

    Alapan, O

    Y. Alapan, O. Yasa, O. Schauer, J. Giltinan, A.F. Tabak, V. Sourjik, M. Sitti, Sci. Robot.3, eaar4423 (2018)

    2018

  13. [19]

    H. Gu, E. Hanedan, Q. Boehler, T.Y. Huang, A.J. Mathijssen, B.J. Nelson, Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 678 (2022)

    2022

  14. [20]

    Spehr, G

    M. Spehr, G. Gisselmann, A. Poplawski, J.A. Riffell, C.H. Wetzel, R.K. Zimmer, H. Hatt, Science 299, 2054 (2003)

    2003

  15. [21]

    Eisenbach, L.C

    M. Eisenbach, L.C. Giojalas, Nature reviews Molecular cell biology7(4), 276 (2006)

    2006

  16. [22]

    Tsang, E

    A.C. Tsang, E. Demir, Y. Ding, O.S. Pak, Adv. Intell. Syst.2, 1900137 (2020) 14 Hartmut Löwen, Benno Liebchen

    2020

  17. [23]

    Najafi, R

    A. Najafi, R. Golestanian, Phys. Rev. E69, 062901 (2004)

    2004

  18. [24]

    Avron, O

    J.E. Avron, O. Kenneth, D.H. Oaknin, New J. Phys.7, 234 (2005)

    2005

  19. [25]

    Ledesma-Aguilar, H

    R. Ledesma-Aguilar, H. Löwen, J.M. Yeomans, Eur. Phys. J. E35, 9746 (2012)

    2012

  20. [26]

    Daddi-Moussa-Ider, M

    A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider, M. Lisicki, C. Hoell, H. Löwen, J. Chem. Phys.148, 134904 (2018)

    2018

  21. [27]

    Tsang, P.W

    A.C.H. Tsang, P.W. Tong, S. Nallan, O.S. Pak, Phys. Rev. Fluids5, 074101 (2020)

    2020

  22. [28]

    Z. Zou, Y. Liu, Y.N. Young, O.S. Pak, A.C. Tsang, Commun. Phys.5, 158 (2022)

    2022

  23. [29]

    Abdi, H.N

    H. Abdi, H.N. Pishkenari, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.123, 106188 (2023)

    2023

  24. [30]

    K. Qin, Z. Zou, L. Zhu, O.S. Pak, Phys. Fluids35, 032003 (2023)

    2023

  25. [31]

    Y. Liu, Z. Zou, A.C.H. Tsang, O.S. Pak, Y.N. Young, Phys. Fluids33, 062007 (2021)

    2021

  26. [32]

    H. Kaur, T. Franosch, M. Caraglio, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Technol.4, 035008 (2023)

    2023

  27. [33]

    Goh, R.G

    S. Goh, R.G. Winkler, G. Gompper, New J. Phys.24, 093039 (2022)

    2022

  28. [34]

    Hartl, M

    B. Hartl, M. Hübl, G. Kahl, A. Zöttl, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.118, e2019683118 (2021)

    2021

  29. [35]

    Ramakrishnan, B.M

    R.O. Ramakrishnan, B.M. Friedrich, EPL142, 47001 (2023)

    2023

  30. [36]

    Liebchen, H

    B. Liebchen, H. Löwen, EPL127, 34003 (2019)

    2019

  31. [37]

    Daddi-Moussa-Ider, H

    A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider, H. Löwen, B. Liebchen, Commun. Phys.4, 15 (2021)

    2021

  32. [38]

    Sutton, A.G

    R.S. Sutton, A.G. Barto,Reinforcement learning: An introduction (MIT press, 2018)

    2018

  33. [39]

    Yang, M.A

    Y. Yang, M.A. Bevan, ACS Nano12, 10712 (2018)

    2018

  34. [40]

    Yang, M.A

    Y. Yang, M.A. Bevan, B. Li, Adv. Intell. Syst.2, 1900106 (2020)

    2020

  35. [41]

    L.Biferale,F.Bonaccorso,M.Buzzicotti,P.ClarkDiLeoni,K.Gustavsson,Chaos 29,103138 (2019)

    2019

  36. [42]

    Yang, M.A

    Y. Yang, M.A. Bevan, B. Li, Adv. Theory Simul.3, 2000034 (2020)

    2020

  37. [43]

    K. Xu, Y. Yang, B. Li, Adv. Intell. Syst.3, 2100115 (2021)

    2021

  38. [44]

    Alageshan, A.K

    J.K. Alageshan, A.K. Verma, J. Bec, R. Pandit, Physical Review E101(4), 043110 (2020)

    2020

  39. [45]

    Zhu, J.H

    Y. Zhu, J.H. Pang, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci.237, 2450 (2023)

    2023

  40. [46]

    Zhu, J.H

    Y. Zhu, J.H. Pang, F.B. Tian, Front. Phys.10, 237 (2022)

    2022

  41. [47]

    Nasiri, B

    M. Nasiri, B. Liebchen, New J. Phys.24, 073042 (2022)

    2022

  42. [48]

    S.Muiños-Landin,A.Fischer,V.Holubec,F.Cichos,ScienceRobotics 6(52),eabd9285(2021)

    2021

  43. [49]

    Schneider, H

    E. Schneider, H. Stark, EPL127, 64003 (2019)

    2019

  44. [50]

    12,7143 (2021)

    P.Gunnarson,I.Mandralis,G.Novati,P.Koumoutsakos,J.O.Dabiri,Nat.Commun. 12,7143 (2021)

    2021

  45. [51]

    Lozano, B

    C. Lozano, B. Ten Hagen, H. Löwen, C. Bechinger, Nat. Commun.7(1), 12828 (2016)

    2016

  46. [53]

    Dijkstra, Numerische Mathematik1, 269 (1959)

    E.W. Dijkstra, Numerische Mathematik1, 269 (1959)

    1959

  47. [54]

    Zarzar, Nat

    C.H.Meredith,P.G.Moerman,J.Groenewold,Y.J.Chiu,W.K.Kegel,A.vanBlaaderen,L.D. Zarzar, Nat. Chem.12, 1136 (2020)

    2020

  48. [55]

    Sengupta, T

    A. Sengupta, T. Kruppa, H. Löwen, Phys. Rev. E83, 031914 (2011)

    2011

  49. [56]

    Schwarzendahl, H

    F.J. Schwarzendahl, H. Löwen, EPL134, 48005 (2021)

    2021

  50. [57]

    Liebchen, H

    B. Liebchen, H. Löwen, inChemical Kinetics: Beyond the Textbook (World Scientific, 2020), p. 493

    2020

  51. [58]

    X. Wang, J. Cheng, L. Wang, Ecol. Complex.42, 100815 (2020)

    2020

  52. [59]

    Gerhard, A

    M. Gerhard, A. Jayaram, A. Fischer, T. Speck, Phys. Rev. E104, 054614 (2021)

    2021

  53. [60]

    Janosov, C

    M. Janosov, C. Virágh, G. Vásárhelyi, T. Vicsek, New J. Phys.19, 053003 (2017)

    2017

  54. [61]

    A.Ranganathan,A.Heyde,A.Gupta,L.Mahadevan,arXivpreprintarXiv:2211.04352(2022)

    2022 arXiv

  55. [62]

    118,e2111142118 (2021)

    A.V.Zampetaki,B.Liebchen,A.V.Ivlev,H.Löwen,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci. 118,e2111142118 (2021)

    2021

  56. [63]

    Ziepke, I

    A. Ziepke, I. Maryshev, I.S. Aranson, E. Frey, Nat. Commun.13, 6727 (2022)

    2022

  57. [64]

    Panait, S

    L. Panait, S. Luke, Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst.11, 387 (2005)

    2005

  58. [65]

    Durve, F

    M. Durve, F. Peruani, A. Celani, Phys. Rev. E102, 012601 (2020)

    2020

  59. [66]

    Speck, J

    T. Speck, J. Bialké, A.M. Menzel, H. Löwen, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 218304 (2014)

    2014

  60. [67]

    Tovey, D

    S. Tovey, D. Zimmer, C. Lohrmann, T. Merkt, S. Koppenhoefer, V.L. Heuthe, C. Bechinger, C. Holm, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.00994 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Verma, G

    S. Verma, G. Novati, P. Koumoutsakos, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.115, 5849 (2018)

    2018

  62. [70]

    Supekar, B

    R. Supekar, B. Song, A. Hastewell, G.P. Choi, A. Mietke, J. Dunkel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2206994120 (2023)

    2023

  63. [71]

    Carrasquilla, R.G

    J. Carrasquilla, R.G. Melko, Nat. Phys.13, 431 (2017)

    2017

  64. [72]

    Rodriguez-Nieva, M.S

    J.F. Rodriguez-Nieva, M.S. Scheurer, Nat. Phys.15, 790 (2019)

    2019

  65. [73]

    Wetzel, Phys

    S.J. Wetzel, Phys. Rev. E96, 022140 (2017)

    2017

  66. [74]

    Van Nieuwenburg, Y.H

    E.P. Van Nieuwenburg, Y.H. Liu, S.D. Huber, Nat. Phys.13, 435 (2017)

    2017

  67. [75]

    Dulaney, J.F

    A.R. Dulaney, J.F. Brady, Soft Matter17, 6808 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    T. Xue, X. Li, X. Chen, L. Chen, Z. Han, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00161 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Jeckel, E

    H. Jeckel, E. Jelli, R. Hartmann, P.K. Singh, R. Mok, J.F. Totz, L. Vidakovic, B. Eckhardt, J. Dunkel, K. Drescher, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.116, 1489 (2019)

    2019

  70. [78]

    Maddu, Q

    S. Maddu, Q. Vagne, I.F. Sbalzarini, arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08623 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Brunton, J.L

    S.L. Brunton, J.L. Proctor, J.N. Kutz, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.113, 3932 (2016)

    2016

  72. [80]

    Rudy, S.L

    S.H. Rudy, S.L. Brunton, J.L. Proctor, J.N. Kutz, Science Advances3, e1602614 (2017)

    2017

  73. [81]

    Champion, B

    K. Champion, B. Lusch, J.N. Kutz, S.L. Brunton, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.116, 22445 (2019)

    2019

  74. [82]

    Hillis, Daedalus117, 175 (1988)

    W.D. Hillis, Daedalus117, 175 (1988)

    1988

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.