pith. sign in

arxiv: 2501.08839 · v4 · submitted 2025-01-15 · 🌊 nlin.CD · physics.comp-ph· quant-ph

Classical and quantum chaos in bean- and peanut-shaped billiards

Pranaya Pratik Das , Tanmayee Patra , Biplab Ganguli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 05:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.CD physics.comp-phquant-ph
keywords billiardsclassical chaosquantum chaosLyapunov exponentlevel spacing distributionout-of-time-order correlatorseigenfunction scarringPoincaré sections
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bean- and peanut-shaped billiards show strong correlation between classical and quantum chaos indicators in fully chaotic regimes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies particle motion inside bean- and peanut-shaped billiards whose boundaries have varying curvature, producing both focusing and defocusing effects with no neutral segments. Classical indicators of chaos such as Lyapunov exponents, Poincaré sections, and phase-space trajectories are compared directly with quantum statistical measures including nearest-neighbour spacing distributions, level-spacing ratios, and the spectral staircase function, as well as dynamical measures like out-of-time-order correlators and spectral complexity. The comparison reveals close agreement in the chaotic regime, along with the presence of eigenfunction scarring. A sympathetic reader would care because the geometry of these specific shapes supplies a clean test case for how boundary curvature controls both classical instability and quantum spectral properties in the same system.

Core claim

In bean- and peanut-shaped billiards with non-uniform curvature consisting of focusing and defocusing walls and without neutral segments, classical dynamics quantified by positive Lyapunov exponents, structured Poincaré sections, and chaotic phase-space flow correlate strongly with quantum dynamics as measured by nearest-neighbour spacing distributions, level-spacing ratios, spectral staircase functions, out-of-time-order correlators, and spectral complexity, with eigenfunction scarring also appearing.

What carries the argument

Billiard boundaries of varying curvature that produce focusing and defocusing effects without neutral segments, allowing direct side-by-side comparison of classical chaos tools and quantum statistical plus dynamical measures.

If this is right

  • Classical chaos measures such as Lyapunov exponents and Poincaré sections align with quantum level-spacing statistics and out-of-time-order correlators.
  • Eigenfunction scarring appears in these systems despite their fully chaotic classical dynamics.
  • The same correlation holds across both statistical and dynamical quantum indicators.
  • Billiards with mixed focusing and defocusing walls but no neutral segments furnish a unified setting for classical-quantum comparisons.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same boundary shapes could be realized in microwave or optical experiments to test the observed classical-quantum alignment directly.
  • The correlation might be checked in other billiard families that combine focusing and defocusing arcs.
  • The presence of scarring suggests that scarring mechanisms may depend more on local curvature than on global integrability.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen bean- and peanut boundaries generate genuinely chaotic motion with no neutral segments that would permit integrable behavior.

What would settle it

If trajectories in these billiards yield zero or negative Lyapunov exponents while the quantum level-spacing distributions fail to follow random-matrix predictions, the claimed correlation would be contradicted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.08839 by Biplab Ganguli, Pranaya Pratik Das, Tanmayee Patra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a)A schematic representation of two nearby trajectory traced by a particle in a billiard domain ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Bean curve for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Cassini oval with two foci ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Billiard flow diagrams representing real space trajectories (periodic, quasi-periodic and chaotic) for (a) Circular, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Caustics produced in (a) Circular, (b) Oval, (c) Bean and (d) Peanut billiards. The red dot(s) represents the IC(s). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Measure of divergence (∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Poincar´e section of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. First 500 eigenvalue spectra for (a) Bean-shaped Billiard and (b) Peanut-shaped Billiard with a few selected eigenstates. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The probability density distributions for eigenstates are displayed for billiards: (a & b) the Bean-shaped billiard and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. In the left column, a slow diverging trajectory in the peanut billiard shows almost periodic and chaotic behaviour in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. NNSD for (a) Circle, (b) Bean (c) Oval and (d) Peanut billiards with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The cumulative level-spacing distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Temperature dependence of spectral complexity at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The plot displays the spectral staircase function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. The probability density distributions for eigenstates are displayed for billiards: (a) circular billiard, (b) oval billiard. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Quantum scars for slow diverging trajectories in (a) bean billiard and (b) peanut-shaped billiard. The red and white [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The geometry of a billiard boundary fundamentally governs its dynamics, ranging from integrable to mixed and fully chaotic regimes. Bean- and peanut-shaped billiards have varying curvature with both focusing and defocusing walls without a neutral segments. Particle dynamics inside these billiards show a strong correlation between classical and quantum dynamics in the chaotic regime also. This fundamental observation comes from our study of classical tools like Lyapunov exponent, Poincar\'e sections, flow trajectories in phase space and quantum tools that includes both statistical and dynamical measures. Statistical indicators include nearest-neighbour spacing distributions, level-spacing ratios, and the spectral staircase function, while dynamical measures include out-of-time-order correlators and spectral complexity. The dynamics in both of these billiard systems also exhibit eigenfunction scarring, an unexpected phenomenon observed in chaotic systems. Overall, our results provide a unified perspective on billiard systems with non-uniform curvature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper examines bean- and peanut-shaped billiards whose boundaries have varying curvature (focusing and defocusing segments, asserted to contain no neutral segments). It reports that particle dynamics in these systems exhibit a strong correlation between classical chaos diagnostics (Lyapunov exponents, Poincaré sections, flow trajectories) and quantum diagnostics (nearest-neighbor spacing distributions, level-spacing ratios, spectral staircase, out-of-time-order correlators, spectral complexity) within a chaotic regime, together with eigenfunction scarring; the overall claim is that these geometries furnish a unified perspective on billiards with non-uniform curvature.

Significance. If the billiards are shown to be uniformly hyperbolic, the work would supply concrete numerical examples of quantum-classical correspondence in chaotic systems whose boundaries mix focusing and defocusing curvature, extending the set of model systems beyond the stadium or Sinai billiards and potentially clarifying the role of boundary curvature in scarring and spectral statistics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Classical dynamics section] The central claim requires a cleanly isolated chaotic regime. The abstract states that the boundaries contain 'no neutral segments,' yet no explicit verification is supplied that Poincaré sections (classical dynamics section) are free of KAM islands or regular orbits across the full phase space; without this, the reported correlations between Lyapunov exponents and quantum spacing statistics lose interpretive force.
  2. [Quantum diagnostics and results sections] The manuscript lists NNSD, level-spacing ratios, OTOCs and scarring as evidence of correlation, but supplies neither quantitative measures of agreement (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances or fitted Brody parameters) nor error bars on the numerical data; it is therefore impossible to judge whether the claimed 'strong correlation' is statistically robust or sensitive to binning/post-selection choices.
  3. [Eigenfunction analysis subsection] Eigenfunction scarring is described as 'unexpected' in chaotic systems, yet the paper does not compare the observed scarring patterns against the classical unstable periodic orbits or provide a quantitative measure (e.g., overlap integrals) that would distinguish scarring from statistical fluctuations in the eigenfunctions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Grammatical error in the abstract: 'without a neutral segments' should read 'without neutral segments.'
  2. [Quantum statistical measures] Notation for the level-spacing ratio r_n is introduced without an explicit formula or reference to the standard definition (e.g., Oganesyan & Huse 2007); this should be added for reproducibility.
  3. [Figures 2-5] Figure captions for Poincaré sections and eigenfunction plots lack axis labels, color scales, and statements of the energy or wave-number range used; these details are required for independent verification.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. We address each major comment below, indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Classical dynamics section] The central claim requires a cleanly isolated chaotic regime. The abstract states that the boundaries contain 'no neutral segments,' yet no explicit verification is supplied that Poincaré sections (classical dynamics section) are free of KAM islands or regular orbits across the full phase space; without this, the reported correlations between Lyapunov exponents and quantum spacing statistics lose interpretive force.

    Authors: We agree that explicit confirmation of a fully chaotic regime without KAM islands is essential. In the revised manuscript we will add Poincaré sections for a denser sampling of initial conditions and energies, together with a quantitative statement on the fraction of phase space occupied by any residual regular orbits, to substantiate the claimed chaotic regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Quantum diagnostics and results sections] The manuscript lists NNSD, level-spacing ratios, OTOCs and scarring as evidence of correlation, but supplies neither quantitative measures of agreement (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances or fitted Brody parameters) nor error bars on the numerical data; it is therefore impossible to judge whether the claimed 'strong correlation' is statistically robust or sensitive to binning/post-selection choices.

    Authors: We accept that quantitative metrics would improve the assessment of robustness. We will include Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances between the computed NNSD and the GOE prediction, fitted Brody parameters where applicable, and error bars on the spectral statistics in the revised version. For OTOCs we will add a brief discussion of sensitivity to binning and ensemble size. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Eigenfunction analysis subsection] Eigenfunction scarring is described as 'unexpected' in chaotic systems, yet the paper does not compare the observed scarring patterns against the classical unstable periodic orbits or provide a quantitative measure (e.g., overlap integrals) that would distinguish scarring from statistical fluctuations in the eigenfunctions.

    Authors: We will revise the wording to clarify that scarring, while less common, is known to occur in chaotic billiards. In the revised manuscript we will identify the relevant unstable periodic orbits from the classical dynamics and overlay them on the scarred eigenfunctions; we will also report overlap integrals between the eigenfunctions and the corresponding scar functions to provide a quantitative measure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; derivations rely on independent numerical diagnostics

full rationale

The paper computes classical diagnostics (Lyapunov exponents, Poincaré sections, phase-space trajectories) and quantum diagnostics (nearest-neighbor spacing, level-spacing ratios, spectral staircase, OTOCs, spectral complexity, eigenfunction scarring) directly from the billiard geometries. No equation or claim reduces a reported correlation or prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor invokes a self-citation chain as the sole justification for uniqueness or an ansatz. The geometric assertion of 'no neutral segments' is presented as a property of the chosen boundaries and is checked via the same numerical tools rather than defined circularly. The observed classical-quantum correlation is therefore an empirical outcome, not a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; numerical studies of this type typically introduce discretization parameters and boundary definitions that are not visible here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5692 in / 1056 out tokens · 32837 ms · 2026-05-23T05:34:46.610287+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

154 extracted references · 154 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    min(· · ·)

    Level spacing ratio To strengthen the validity of our results, we employed another commonly used short-range statistical measure, the level spacing ratio (LSR)[106, 128–130]. Oganesyan and Huse[131] in 2007 introduced the distribution of the ratios 17 Data binning or bucketing is a data preprocessing method used to minimize the effects of small observatio...

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    area, perimeter, or volume)

    The smooth part, ( NW eyl(E)): This represents the mean density of states and is dictated by the geometric characteristics of the system (e.g. area, perimeter, or volume)

    work page

  3. [3]

    In integrable systems, N(E) grows smoothly with small, regular fluctuations

    The fluctuating part ( N(E)): It captures oscillatory deviations from the smooth part strongly influenced by classical periodic orbits (via the Gutzwiller trace formula) and quantum chaos. In integrable systems, N(E) grows smoothly with small, regular fluctuations. This shows that the level spacing is uniform. On the other hand, chaotic systems have irreg...

    work page

  4. [4]

    High temperatures ( β → 0): All energy levels contribute equally, probing global spectral correlations

    work page

  5. [5]

    saturation

    Low temperatures ( β ≫ 1): Suppresses high-energy states, isolating low-energy dynamics. In all cases, spectral complexity initially increases according to the relationship Cs(t) ∝ c1 log cosh c2t β ) cap- turing a period of rapid growth. However, following this initial phase, growth ceases and the spectral complexity fluctuates erratically around a const...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Eigenfunctions in chaotic quantum systems,

    A. B¨ acker, “Eigenfunctions in chaotic quantum systems,” 2007. 1

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Quantum chaology, not quantum chaos,

    M. Berry, “Quantum chaology, not quantum chaos,” Physica Scripta, vol. 40, p. 335, sep 1989

    work page 1989

  8. [8]

    The bakerian lecture, 1987. quantum chaology,

    M. V. Berry, I. C. Percival, and N. O. Weiss, “The bakerian lecture, 1987. quantum chaology,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences , vol. 413, no. 1844, pp. 183–198, 1987. 1

    work page 1987

  9. [9]

    E. D. Leonel, Introduction to Billiard Dynamics , pp. 171–180. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. 1, 10

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    What is ... a billiard,

    Y. G. Sinai, “What is ... a billiard,” Notices Amer. Math. Soc. , vol. 51, pp. 412–413, 2004

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    The billard ball problem on a table with a convex boundary–an illustrative dynamical problem,

    H. Poritsky, “The billard ball problem on a table with a convex boundary–an illustrative dynamical problem,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 446–470, 1950

    work page 1950

  12. [12]

    The Birkhoff-Poritsky conjecture for centrally-symmetric billiard tables,

    M. Bialy and A. E. Mironov, “The Birkhoff-Poritsky conjecture for centrally-symmetric billiard tables,” Annals of Math- ematics, vol. 196, no. 1, pp. 389 – 413. 24

    work page

  13. [13]

    Chernov and R

    N. Chernov and R. Markarian, Chaotic Billiards. Mathematical surveys and monographs, American Mathematical Society,

    work page

  14. [14]

    H. J. Korsch and F. Zimmer, Chaotic Billiards, pp. 15–36. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002. 1, 15

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    Billiards with spatial memory,

    T. Albers, S. Delnoij, N. Schramma, and M. Jalaal, “Billiards with spatial memory,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 132, p. 157101, Apr 2024. 1

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    181. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: an Introduction - Matematicamente,

    A. Bernardo, “181. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: an Introduction - Matematicamente,” 4 2013. 2

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    The quantum mechanics of chaotic billiards,

    G. Casati and T. Prosen, “The quantum mechanics of chaotic billiards,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena , vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 293–310, 1999. Classical Chaos and its Quantum Manifestations. 2

    work page 1999

  18. [18]

    Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems

    E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems . Cambridge University Press, 2002. 2

    work page 2002

  19. [19]

    Chernov and R

    N. Chernov and R. Markarian, Chaotic Billiards . Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Society, 2023. 2, 9

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    The Ergodic Hierarchy,

    R. Frigg, J. Berkovitz, and F. Kronz, “The Ergodic Hierarchy,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (E. N. Zalta, ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2020 ed., 2020

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    The ergodic hierarchy, randomness and hamiltonian chaos,

    J. Berkovitz, R. Frigg, and F. Kronz, “The ergodic hierarchy, randomness and hamiltonian chaos,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics , vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 661–691, 2006. 2

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    Statistical properties of two-dimensional hyperbolic billiards,

    L. A. Bunimovich, Y. G. Sinai, and N. I. Chernov, “Statistical properties of two-dimensional hyperbolic billiards,”Russian Mathematical Surveys, vol. 46, no. 4, p. 47, 1991. 3

    work page 1991

  23. [23]

    On the foundations of the ergodic hypothesis for a dynamical system of statistical mechanics,

    Y. G. Sinai, “On the foundations of the ergodic hypothesis for a dynamical system of statistical mechanics,” in Doklady Akademii Nauk, vol. 153, pp. 1261–1264, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1963

    work page 1963

  24. [24]

    Dynamical systems with elastic reflections,

    Y. G. Sinai, “Dynamical systems with elastic reflections,” Russian Mathematical Surveys , vol. 25, no. 2, p. 137, 1970. 3

    work page 1970

  25. [25]

    Diffusion in a periodic lorentz gas,

    B. Moran, W. G. Hoover, and S. Bestiale, “Diffusion in a periodic lorentz gas,” Journal of Statistical Physics , vol. 48, pp. 709–726, 1987. 3

    work page 1987

  26. [26]

    On ergodic properties of certain billiards,

    L. A. Bunimovich, “On ergodic properties of certain billiards,” Functional Analysis and Its Applications , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 254–255, 1974. 3

    work page 1974

  27. [27]

    Conditions of stochasticity of two-dimensional billiards,

    L. A. Bunimovich, “Conditions of stochasticity of two-dimensional billiards,” Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 187–193, 1991. 3

    work page 1991

  28. [28]

    Leaking chaotic systems,

    E. G. Altmann, J. S. E. Portela, and T. T´ el, “Leaking chaotic systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 85, pp. 869–918, May

    work page

  29. [29]

    Polygonal billiards,

    G. Harris, “Polygonal billiards,” Southern Illinois university Edwardsville , vol. 87, p. 88, 2007. 3

    work page 2007

  30. [30]

    Early-time exponential instabilities in nonchaotic quantum systems,

    E. B. Rozenbaum, L. A. Bunimovich, and V. Galitski, “Early-time exponential instabilities in nonchaotic quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 125, p. 014101, Jul 2020

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Quantum chaos and the correspondence principle,

    J. Wang, G. Benenti, G. Casati, and W.-g. Wang, “Quantum chaos and the correspondence principle,” Phys. Rev. E , vol. 103, p. L030201, Mar 2021

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Anomalous spectral statistics in a symmetrical billiard,

    F. Leyvraz, C. Schmit, and T. H. Seligman, “Anomalous spectral statistics in a symmetrical billiard,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , vol. 29, p. L575, nov 1996. 3

    work page 1996

  33. [33]

    Principles for the design of billiards with nonvanishing lyapunov exponents,

    M. Wojtkowski, “Principles for the design of billiards with nonvanishing lyapunov exponents,” Communications in Math- ematical Physics, vol. 105, pp. 391–414, Sep 1986. 3, 4

    work page 1986

  34. [34]

    Improved eigenvalue sums for inferring quantum billiard geometry,

    M. Berry, “Improved eigenvalue sums for inferring quantum billiard geometry,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 20, no. 9, p. 2389, 1987. 3

    work page 1987

  35. [35]

    Neutrino billiards: time-reversal symmetry-breaking without magnetic fields,

    M. V. Berry and R. J. Mondragon, “Neutrino billiards: time-reversal symmetry-breaking without magnetic fields,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences , vol. 412, no. 1842, pp. 53–74, 1987

    work page 1987

  36. [36]

    Spectral properties of dirac billiards at the van hove singularities,

    B. Dietz, T. Klaus, M. Miski-Oglu, A. Richter, M. Wunderle, and C. Bouazza, “Spectral properties of dirac billiards at the van hove singularities,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, p. 023901, Jan 2016

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    Phase shift experiments identifying kramers doublets in a chaotic superconducting microwave billiard of threefold symmetry,

    C. Dembowski, B. Dietz, H.-D. Gr¨ af, A. Heine, F. Leyvraz, M. Miski-Oglu, A. Richter, and T. H. Seligman, “Phase shift experiments identifying kramers doublets in a chaotic superconducting microwave billiard of threefold symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 90, p. 014102, Jan 2003

    work page 2003

  38. [38]

    Microwave photonic crystals, graphene, and honeycomb-kagome billiards with threefold sym- metry: Comparison with nonrelativistic and relativistic quantum billiards,

    W. Zhang and B. Dietz, “Microwave photonic crystals, graphene, and honeycomb-kagome billiards with threefold sym- metry: Comparison with nonrelativistic and relativistic quantum billiards,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 104, p. 064310, Aug 2021

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Properties of eigenmodes and quantum-chaotic scattering in a superconducting microwave dirac billiard with threefold rotational symmetry,

    W. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Che, M. Miski-Oglu, and B. Dietz, “Properties of eigenmodes and quantum-chaotic scattering in a superconducting microwave dirac billiard with threefold rotational symmetry,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 107, p. 144308, Apr 2023

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Graphene billiards with fourfold symmetry,

    W. Zhang and B. Dietz, “Graphene billiards with fourfold symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 5, p. 043028, Oct 2023. 3

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    H. M. Cundy and A. P. Rollett, Mathematical models. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1961. 2nd ed. 3, 4

    work page 1961

  42. [42]

    Continuous space representations of human activity spaces,

    V. S. Vaze, S. Sch¨ onfelder, and K. W. Axhausen, “Continuous space representations of human activity spaces,” Arbeits- berichte Verkehrs-und Raumplanung, vol. 295, 2005. 4, 5

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    Bean curve

    E. W. Weisstein, “Bean curve.”

    work page

  44. [44]

    Weisstein, CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics

    E. Weisstein, CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics . CRC Press, 2002. 3, 4, 5

    work page 2002

  45. [45]

    Numerical verification of percival’s conjecture in a quantum billiard,

    G. Carlo, E. Vergini, and A. J. Fendrik, “Numerical verification of percival’s conjecture in a quantum billiard,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 57, pp. 5397–5403, May 1998. 3

    work page 1998

  46. [46]

    A multi foci closed curve: Cassini oval, its properties and applications,

    M. Karata¸ s, “A multi foci closed curve: Cassini oval, its properties and applications,”Do˘ gu¸ s¨Universitesi Dergisi, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 231–248, 2013

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    Inverse scattering for an impedance cylinder buried in a dielectric cylinder,

    R. Kress, F. Yaman, A. Yapar, and I. Akduman, “Inverse scattering for an impedance cylinder buried in a dielectric cylinder,” Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering , vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 473–488, 2009. 3 25

    work page 2009

  48. [48]

    Duality between quantum and classical dynamics for integrable billiards,

    W. T. Lu, W. Zeng, and S. Sridhar, “Duality between quantum and classical dynamics for integrable billiards,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 73, p. 046201, 2006. 4

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    Classical and quantum mechanics of a strongly chaotic billiard system,

    M. Sieber and F. Steiner, “Classical and quantum mechanics of a strongly chaotic billiard system,” Physica D, vol. 44, pp. 248–266, 1990. 4

    work page 1990

  50. [50]

    Gibson, Elementary Geometry of Algebraic Curves: An Undergraduate Introduction

    C. Gibson, Elementary Geometry of Algebraic Curves: An Undergraduate Introduction. Elementary Geometry of Algebraic Curves: An Undergraduate Introduction, Cambridge University Press, 1998. 4

    work page 1998

  51. [51]

    Abbena, S

    E. Abbena, S. Salamon, and A. Gray, Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces with Mathematica. Textbooks in Mathematics, CRC Press, 2017. 6

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    Lawrence, A Catalog of Special Plane Curves

    J. Lawrence, A Catalog of Special Plane Curves . Dover Books on Mathematics, Dover Publications, 1972

    work page 1972

  53. [53]

    Yates, A Handbook on Curves and Their Properties

    R. Yates, A Handbook on Curves and Their Properties . J.W. Edwards, 1947

    work page 1947

  54. [54]

    Lockwood, A Book of Curves

    E. Lockwood, A Book of Curves . University Press, 1967

    work page 1967

  55. [55]

    Needham, Visual complex analysis

    T. Needham, Visual complex analysis . Oxford University Press, 2023. 6

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Popescu-Pampu, Jakob Bernoulli and the Construction of Curves , pp

    P. Popescu-Pampu, Jakob Bernoulli and the Construction of Curves , pp. 11–13. Cham: Springer International Publishing,

    work page

  57. [57]

    Applications of the symmetrical structures of cassini ovals,

    P. Grabusts and O. Uzhga-Rebrov, “Applications of the symmetrical structures of cassini ovals,” Symmetry, vol. 16, no. 3,

    work page

  58. [58]

    Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems

    M. Skolnik, Introduction to Radar Systems . McGraw-Hill Education, 2002

    work page 2002

  59. [59]

    Willis, Bistatic Radar

    N. Willis, Bistatic Radar. Artech House radar library, Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2005. 6

    work page 2005

  60. [60]

    Brieskorn, H

    E. Brieskorn, H. Kn¨ orrer, and J. Stillwell, Plane Algebraic Curves: Translated by John Stillwell . Modern Birkh¨ auser Classics, Springer Basel, 2012. 6

    work page 2012

  61. [61]

    Wells, The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry

    D. Wells, The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry . Penguin book, Penguin Books, 1991. 6

    work page 1991

  62. [62]

    The toric sections: a simple introduction,

    L. Moroni, “The toric sections: a simple introduction,” 2017. 6

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Strogatz and M

    S. Strogatz and M. Dichter, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos, 2nd ed. SET with Student Solutions Manual . Studies in Nonlinearity, Avalon Publishing, 2016. 6

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Predictability: Does the flap of a butterfly’s wing in brazil set off a tornado in texas?,

    E. Lorenz, “Predictability: Does the flap of a butterfly’s wing in brazil set off a tornado in texas?,” 1972

    work page 1972

  65. [65]

    Sivakumar, Fundamentals of Chaos Theory , pp

    B. Sivakumar, Fundamentals of Chaos Theory , pp. 149–171. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2017. 6

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    A survey of dynamical billiards,

    M. Himmelstrand and V. Wil´ en, “A survey of dynamical billiards,” 2013. 7

    work page 2013

  67. [67]

    Domain decomposition, operator trigonometry, robin condition,

    K. Gustafson, “Domain decomposition, operator trigonometry, robin condition,” Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 218, pp. 432–437, 1998. 7

    work page 1998

  68. [68]

    Quantum chaos in billiards,

    A. B¨ acker, “Quantum chaos in billiards,”Computing in Science & Engineering , vol. 9, 2007. 7, 16

    work page 2007

  69. [69]

    On the integrability of birkhoff billiards,

    V. Kaloshin and A. Sorrentino, “On the integrability of birkhoff billiards,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , vol. 376, no. 2131, p. 20170419, 2018. 9

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    Caustics through the looking glass,

    J. Bruce, P. Giblin, and C. Gibson, “Caustics through the looking glass,”The Mathematical Intelligencer, vol. 6, pp. 47–58,

    work page

  71. [71]

    The inverse caustic problem,

    N. Hungerb¨ uhler, “The inverse caustic problem,” The American Mathematical Monthly , vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 387–400,

    work page

  72. [72]

    Iv catastrophe optics: Morphologies of caustics and their diffraction patterns,

    M. Berry and C. Upstill, “Iv catastrophe optics: Morphologies of caustics and their diffraction patterns,” vol. 18 of Progress in Optics, pp. 257–346, Elsevier, 1980. 9

    work page 1980

  73. [73]

    Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics

    M. Gutzwiller, Chaos in Classical and Quantum Mechanics . Springer, 2014. 9

    work page 2014

  74. [74]

    Evolution of semiclassical quantum states in phase space,

    M. V. Berry, “Evolution of semiclassical quantum states in phase space,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 12, p. 625, may 1979. 10

    work page 1979

  75. [75]

    Cvitanovic, R

    P. Cvitanovic, R. Artuso, R. Mainieri, G. Tanner, G. Vattay, N. Whelan, and A. Wirzba, Chaos: classical and quantum , vol. 69. 2005. 10

    work page 2005

  76. [76]

    Chapter V : Billiards - Duhem’s bull,

    J. Leys, ´E. Ghys, and A. Alvarez, “Chapter V : Billiards - Duhem’s bull,” in Chaos – A Mathematical Adventure , Lyon: ´Ecole normale sup´ erieure de Lyon, 2013

    work page 2013

  77. [77]

    Complex dynamics in circular and deformed bilayer graphene-inspired billiards with anisotropy and strain,

    L. Seemann, J. Lukin, M. H¨ aßler, S. Gemming, and M. Hentschel, “Complex dynamics in circular and deformed bilayer graphene-inspired billiards with anisotropy and strain,” Symmetry, vol. 17, no. 2, 2025

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    Few islands approximation of hamiltonian system with divided phase space,

    T. P. Leonid A. Bunimovich, Giulio Casati and G. Vidmar, “Few islands approximation of hamiltonian system with divided phase space,” Experimental Mathematics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 459–468, 2021. 10

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    Datseris and U

    G. Datseris and U. Parlitz, Billiards, Conservative Systems and Ergodicity , pp. 121–136. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. 11

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    Phase breaking in a quantum billiard,

    T. Iitaka, J. Bird, M. Stopa, K. Ishibashi, Y. Aoyagi, and T. Sugano, “Phase breaking in a quantum billiard,”International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos , vol. 07, no. 04, pp. 937–943, 1997. 11

    work page 1997

Showing first 80 references.