Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Decompose-ToM: Enhancing Theory of Mind Reasoning in Large Language Models through Simulation and Task Decomposition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.09056 v1 pith:E467UIYH submitted 2025-01-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords tasktasksmodelmodelstheoryacrossalgorithmalthough
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability to understand and reflect on the mental states of others. Although this capability is crucial for human interaction, testing on Large Language Models (LLMs) reveals that they possess only a rudimentary understanding of it. Although the most capable closed-source LLMs have come close to human performance on some ToM tasks, they still perform poorly on complex variations of the task that involve more structured reasoning. In this work, we utilize the concept of "pretend-play", or ``Simulation Theory'' from cognitive psychology to propose ``Decompose-ToM'': an LLM-based inference algorithm that improves model performance on complex ToM tasks. We recursively simulate user perspectives and decompose the ToM task into a simpler set of functions: subject identification, question-reframing, world model updation, and knowledge availability. We test the algorithm on higher-order ToM tasks and a task testing for ToM capabilities in a conversational setting, demonstrating that our approach shows significant improvement across models compared to baseline methods while requiring minimal prompt tuning across tasks and no additional model training.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Small LLMs Do Not Learn a Generalizable Theory of Mind via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards makes a small LLM overfit theory-of-mind benchmarks, not acquire a generalizable theory of mind.

  2. UniToMBench: Integrating Perspective-Taking to Improve Theory of Mind in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new benchmark, UniToMBench, is proposed for evaluating Theory of Mind in LLMs, but its evaluation results are mixed and do not substantiate the claimed improvements.

Pith tools