Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Selective Excitation of IR-Inactive Modes via Vibrational Polaritons: Insights from Atomistic Simulations

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cavity polaritons can transiently populate the symmetry-forbidden bending mode of methane, giving more energy to a mode IR light alone cannot excite.

desk verdict A solid CavMD study showing that pumping a vibrational polariton can transiently put more energy into an IR-inactive mode than the IR-active mode that forms the polariton; the core observation holds despite a qualitative analytical link. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09094 v2 pith:XFMUHL3P submitted 2025-01-15 physics.chem-ph

Xinwei Ji , Tao E. Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords vibrationalstrongcouplingpolaritonsIR-inactivemodesliquidmethanecavitymoleculardynamicsFermi'sgoldenruleintramolecularenergyredistributionupperpolariton
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses classical cavity molecular dynamics simulations to argue that pumping the upper polariton (UP) formed by the infrared-active v4 asymmetric bending mode of liquid methane can transiently deposit more energy into the infrared-inactive v2 symmetric bending mode than into the v4 mode itself. Ordinary IR light cannot reach v2 because it is symmetry-forbidden, so the claim is that polariton formation opens a route to selectively drive a dark vibration. The authors find the effect in both an empirical force field and a machine-learning potential, and they reproduce the polariton decay rates with a Fermi's golden rule expression in which intramolecular anharmonic and Coriolis couplings carry the v2 channel. They further show that the v2 excitation is maximized when the UP is about two-thirds photonic and one-third molecular. If right, the mechanism implies that polariton pumping creates unusual vibrational population distributions on timescales longer than the polariton lifetime.

What carries the argument

The central object is the upper polariton (UP) formed when a cavity photon hybridizes with the collective bright mode of methane's triply degenerate, IR-active v4 asymmetric bending vibration. The transfer to the IR-inactive v2 mode is quantified by Fermi's golden rule rates, Eq. (1), in which the v2 channel is driven by the intramolecular anharmonic coupling Xi_24 and the Coriolis coupling Z_24 weighted by the molecular (bright-mode) weight |X_B|^2 and a spectral-overlap integral J_UP,v2. The simulations decompose molecular motion into Td symmetry coordinates to resolve the v1-v4 populations.

What would settle it

Measure the polariton decay rate and the transient v2 population of liquid methane (or CH4 in an inert solvent) as the UP frequency is tuned across 1500 $cm^{-1}$ with a Gaussian pump. The paper predicts a second peak in the decay rate and a v2 transient exceeding the v4 transient within about 5 ps; if neither appears, or if a higher-level anharmonic surface calculation shows the v2-v4 couplings are negligible, the mechanism is refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that exciting the upper polariton formed by the v4 mode of methane can selectively energy-transfer into the IR-inactive v2 mode: in the simulated liquid at 110 K, once the UP frequency exceeds about 1500 $cm^{-1}$, the transient v2 vibrational energy per molecule exceeds that of the v4 mode within a few picoseconds of pumping. The effect appears after the polariton itself has decayed, through intramolecular energy redistribution mediated by the anharmonic coupling Xi_24 and the rovibrational Coriolis coupling Z_24 between the v2 and v4 transitions. The authors validate the result by repeating the simulations with a machine-learning potential and by deriving the UP decay rates from Fermi's golden rule, obtaining a second peak in the decay rate when the UP approaches the v2 frequency. They also show that pumping the bare v2 mode outside the cavity produces essentially no excitation, and that the strongest v2 accumulation occurs at a light-matter hybridization where the photonic weight is 2/3, consistent with their expression E_v2 is proportional to $E0^{2}$ |X_c|^4 |X_B|^2.

Load-bearing premise

The simulated v2 selectivity is real only if the force fields (COMPASS and the machine-learning potential) reproduce the actual intramolecular anharmonic and Coriolis couplings between the v2 and v4 bending modes of methane; if those couplings are misrepresented, the effect is a simulation artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • UP pumping near 1500 cm^-1 in methane deposits more transient energy into v2 than v4, giving a control handle on a symmetry-forbidden mode.
  • Because the transfer happens after polariton decay, it provides a dark-state pathway that can act on timescales beyond the polariton lifetime, consistent with long-lived effects in strong-coupling experiments.
  • The v2 gain is largest at a specific hybridization (photonic weight 2/3), so cavity frequency and coupling can be tuned to optimize the selective excitation.
  • Lowering the molecular density prolongs the selective v2 excitation, suggesting gas-phase or dilute-solution implementations.
  • The qualitative agreement between two force fields and the golden-rule rates supports the robustness of the mechanism, though competing pathways such as UP + v2 to v3 also matter around resonance.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the modulation of intramolecular couplings is the operative mechanism, similar IR-inactive-mode selectivity should be achievable in other tetrahedral or high-symmetry molecules (e.g., CD4, SiH4) by tuning a cavity to bring a polariton into resonance with the dark mode.
  • The 2/3 photonic-weight optimum is a design rule that could be tested in other polaritonic systems, such as exciton-polariton to triplet energy transfer, where a similar trade-off between absorption strength and transfer rate is expected.
  • A converged quantum-dynamics calculation (or an accurate anharmonic potential surface) that directly computes Xi_24 and Z_24 would provide a much stronger test of the mechanism than the two classical potentials used here.
  • Because the effect appears post-decay, time-resolved Raman or IR-pump/anti-Stokes-probe experiments on methane or CD4 under VSC could observe the predicted v2 population reversal within a few picoseconds.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uses classical cavity molecular dynamics (CavMD) simulations of liquid methane under vibrational strong coupling to show that pumping the upper polariton formed by the IR-active asymmetric bending mode (v4) can transiently deposit more energy into the IR-inactive symmetric bending mode (v2) than into the v4 mode itself. The central observation is supported by a battery of protocols: COMPASS force-field and GAP machine-learning potentials, CD4 isotope control, reduced molecular density, both cw molecular pumping and Gaussian cavity pumping with a lossy cavity, and N-scalability checks. The authors complement the simulations with a Fermi golden-rule model (Eq. (1)) and derive a condition for optimal v2 excitation efficiency, |X_c|^2 = 2/3 (Eq. (2)), which they test by varying the cavity frequency at fixed UP frequency. They argue that polariton formation, not direct IR excitation, is required for the selective v2 accumulation, and that this mechanism acts on timescales longer than the polariton lifetime.

Significance. If the central claim survives scrutiny, it is significant: it demonstrates a concrete mechanism whereby pumping a vibrational polariton can access a symmetry-forbidden dark mode, going beyond the 'optical filter' picture of vibrational strong coupling and providing a design principle for selectively driving IR-inactive vibrations. The strength of the paper is its multi-pronged validation: the v2 > v4 transient is directly observed in molecular dynamics, reproduced with a machine-learning potential trained on first-principles energies, confirmed in a CD4 isotope control, and robust to the excitation scheme (cw molecular pumping versus Gaussian cavity pumping with a lossy cavity). The analytical formula Eq. (2) gives a parameter-free prediction for the optimal light-matter mixing given a fixed UP frequency, and the numerical maximum in Fig. 4f is close to the predicted value. These strengths make the central observation credible despite the use of classical nuclear potentials. However, the quantitative connection between the simulated dynamics and the golden-rule parameters in Eq. (1) remains incomplete, and the statistical significance of the key crossover is not demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.D-II.E and SI Sec. I.B] The golden-rule rates in Eq. (1) contain the intramolecular couplings Xi24 and Z24 (and Xi44 and Delta_dd), but none of these parameters are extracted from the COMPASS or GAP-ML potentials used in the simulations. The agreement reported in Fig. 3 is only about the parametric dependence on Nsimu and density, not a quantitative validation of the rate itself. Because the central mechanistic claim is that v2-v4 anharmonic and Coriolis couplings mediate the selective transfer, the authors should evaluate these couplings from the simulated potentials (or from ab initio calculations for a single methane molecule) and compare the predicted gamma_UPv4->v2 with the simulated decay rates. Without this, the golden-rule analysis is illustrative rather than confirmatory, and the possibility remains that a different anharmonic term or the coordinate definitions, rather than the assumed Xi24/Z24 couplings, produce the simulated selectivity.
  2. [Sec. II.B, Figs. 2f-j and 2k-o] The central quantitative claim is that the v2 excitation 'exceeds' the v4 excitation within 5 ps at large coupling, but no error bars or confidence intervals are provided for the integrated peak intensities or the symmetry-coordinate energies. Since these are averages over 40 trajectories, the statistical significance of the crossover (e.g., in Fig. 2o) should be quantified with standard errors or bootstrap intervals. This is particularly important because the magnitude of the v2-v4 difference appears modest in some panels, and the reader cannot judge whether the effect is robust to trajectory-to-trajectory fluctuations.
  3. [Sec. II.C and SI Sec. III.E] The v2 and v4 populations are extracted from the bend symmetry coordinates of Eq. (S39), yet the authors themselves cite Ref. 68 (Wang and Carrington, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 6260 (2003)), which identifies deficiencies in exactly these bend symmetry coordinates for methane. If the coordinates mix v2 and v4 character, the quantitative energy partition between v2 and v4 could be biased. The time-resolved bending-angle spectra in Figs. 2a-e partially mitigate this concern because they show a distinct peak near 1510 cm-1 without relying on the symmetry coordinates, but the main quantitative v2 > v4 statement in Figs. 2k-o does rely on the deficient coordinates. The authors should either justify the adequacy of these coordinates for the present purpose, use an alternative coordinate set, or quantify the mixing and show that it does not affect the conclusion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [SI Sec. IV.J, caption of Fig. S15] The word 'Guassian' in the caption of Fig. S15 should be 'Gaussian'.
  2. [Fig. 1d] The decay rates are plotted as points without error bars; since three pulse fluences are shown, including per-fluence uncertainties from the exponential fits would help the reader assess the double-peak structure.
  3. [Eq. (S17) and related equations] The notation Nnn for the number of nearest neighbors within a degenerate mode is confusing; it resembles the molecular number N and should be renamed (e.g., n_nn or z) to avoid confusion.
  4. [Sec. II.C, paragraph on v3 excitation] The proposed UPv4 + v2 -> v3 pathway is supported only by qualitative temporal arguments; a sentence noting that a quantitative rate estimate would require higher-order anharmonic coefficients would help calibrate the reader's confidence in this side channel.
  5. [Sec. III.B, Fig. 4] The caption of Fig. 4f mentions 'v2+v3' in magenta, but the main-text discussion of the v2+v3 maximum energy gain would benefidd from a brief definition of what is summed, since v3 is a stretching mode and v2 is a bending mode.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central v2-selectivity claim is a direct MD observation with two independent potentials (COMPASS and GAP-ML); the golden-rule and 2/3 analyses are not fitted to the simulated v2 energies, and the self-citations to the authors' own CavMD framework are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claim, that pumping the UP formed by the v4 mode can transiently excite the IR-inactive v2 mode, is established by directly analyzing simulated molecular trajectories: time-resolved bending-angle spectra and symmetry-coordinate energy dynamics in Fig. 2, with the same qualitative result obtained using both the COMPASS force field and a machine-learned GAP potential (SI Sec. K). This simulation result does not depend on the analytical theory for its existence. The analytical golden-rule rates in Eq. (1) are derived in the SI from a Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian with perturbative anharmonic and Coriolis couplings; the coupling constants Xi24 and Z24 are not fitted to the simulated v2 energies, and the comparisons in Fig. 3 are qualitative tests of Nsimu invariance and density dependence, not fits. Equation (2) is a derived product of photonic absorption weight |X_c|^4 and molecular weight |X_B|^2, and the predicted optimum at |X_c|^2 = 2/3 is compared with, not extracted from, the simulated turnover in Fig. 4f. The manuscript does cite the authors' earlier CavMD papers (Refs. 23-26) and states the analytical derivation follows Ref. 26, but the derivation is reproduced in the SI and the CavMD methodology is code-released; no uniqueness theorem or unverified prior result is invoked to forbid alternatives. The main weakness, that Xi24 and Z24 are never directly evaluated from the simulated potentials, undermines the quantitative force of the golden-rule comparison but is a validation gap, not circularity, because the simulation data do not presuppose those constants. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained relative to the central simulation result.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard polariton Hamiltonians, perturbative rate theory, classical molecular dynamics, and empirical/ML potential energy surfaces, all of which are pre-existing. No new entity is postulated. The main load-bearing inputs are the force-field couplings and the classical treatment, which are cross-checked but not exact.

free parameters (3)
  • effective light-matter coupling per molecule eps_tilde = 0 to 5e-4 a.u. (swept)
    Scan parameter that controls Rabi splitting and UP frequency; it is needed to create different polariton conditions, but no value is fitted to reproduce a specific target observable.
  • cavity photon mode partial charge Qc = 0.028 a.u.
    Hand-set to balance cavity absorption with the 0.75 ps cavity lifetime in the lossy-cavity simulations, following input-output theory; the central selectivity is also seen in lossless simulations, so the claim does not rest on this value.
  • cavity lifetime tau_c = 0.75 ps
    Chosen as a realistic cavity lifetime; the selective v2 excitation also appears in the lossless simulations (Fig. 2), so this is not a fitted determinant.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian with harmonic molecular oscillators describes the cavity-molecule system in the strong-coupling regime (SI Eq. S1)
    The analytical theory starts from this Hamiltonian; it neglects anharmonicity in the bright mode and counter-rotating terms in the analytical part (though CavMD includes them).
  • domain assumption Fermi's golden rule applies to the polariton-to-dark-state relaxation, treating inter/intramolecular couplings as weak perturbations (SI Sec. I)
    This is the basis of Eq. (1); no numerical justification of perturbative validity is given for the specific couplings in liquid methane.
  • domain assumption Nuclear dynamics and the Coriolis coupling J_alpha can be treated classically (CavMD and SI Eq. S25 high-temperature limit)
    The simulations use classical molecular dynamics; quantum nuclear effects and cavity-field quantization beyond the classical treatment are not included, as the authors note in the Discussion.
  • domain assumption COMPASS force field and GAP machine-learning potential accurately describe liquid CH4 intramolecular couplings and intermolecular interactions (Sec. II)
    The central simulation result is generated with these potentials; the authors validate against each other, but no direct experimental validation for the v2-v4 couplings is provided.
  • standard math Standard Td symmetry coordinates project out the v1-v4 modes cleanly (SI Eq. S39)
    The energy decomposition into v1-v4 modes uses these coordinates; they are standard for methane, though the authors cite Wang and Carrington on their deficiencies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Selective Excitation of IR-Inactive Modes via Vibrational Polaritons: Insights from Atomistic Simulations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XFMUHL3P

@misc{pith2026250109094,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Selective Excitation of IR-Inactive Modes via Vibrational Polaritons: Insights from Atomistic Simulations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XFMUHL3P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09094}
}
read the original abstract

Vibrational polaritons, hybrid light-matter states formed between molecular vibrations and infrared (IR) cavity modes, provide a novel approach for modifying chemical reaction pathways and energy transfer processes. For vibrational polaritons involving condensed-phase molecules, the short polariton lifetime raises debate over whether pumping polaritons may produce different effects on molecules compared to directly exciting the molecules in free space or under weak coupling. Here, for liquid methane under vibrational strong coupling, classical cavity molecular dynamics simulations show that pumping the upper polariton (UP) formed by the asymmetric bending mode of methane can sometimes selectively excite the IR-inactive symmetric bending mode. This finding is validated when the molecular system is described using both empirical force fields and machine-learning potentials, also in qualitative agreement with analytical theory of polariton energy transfer rates based on Fermi's golden rule calculations. Additionally, our study suggests that polariton-induced energy transfer to IR-inactive modes reaches maximal efficiency when the UP has significant contributions from both photons and molecules, underscoring the importance of light-matter hybridization. As IR-inactive vibrational modes are generally inaccessible to direct IR excitation, our study highlights the unique role of polariton formation in selectively controlling IR-inactive vibrations. Since this polariton-induced process occurs after the polariton decays, it may impact IR photochemistry on a timescale longer than the polariton lifetime, as observed in experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09094 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Liquid-phase methane under VSC. (a) Schematic representation of the four unique vibrational modes in CH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Average vibrational energy dynamics per molecule following the UP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Parameter dependence on the fitted UP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. UP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FDTD with Auxiliary Bath Fields for Condensed-Phase Polaritonics: Fundamentals and Implementation

    physics.optics 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FDTD simulations can now include dark-mode molecular degrees of freedom through a new Lorentz-Bath susceptibility, implemented in MEEP and demonstrated in model Fabry-Perot cavities.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Shalabney, J

    A. Shalabney, J. George, J. Hutchison, G. Pupillo, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, Coherent Coupling of Molecular Resonators with a Microcavity Mode, Nat. Commun. 6, 5981 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    J. P. Long and B. S. Simpkins, Coherent Coupling be- tween a Molecular Vibration and Fabry–Perot Optical Cavity to Give Hybridized States in the Strong Coupling Limit, ACS Photonics2, 130 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Thomas, J

    A. Thomas, J. George, A. Shalabney, M. Dryzhakov, S. J. Varma, J. Moran, T. Chervy, X. Zhong, E. Devaux, C. Genet, J. A. Hutchison, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ground- State Chemical Reactivity under Vibrational Coupling to the Vacuum Electromagnetic Field, Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 55, 11462 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Thomas, L

    A. Thomas, L. Lethuillier-Karl, K. Nagarajan, R. M. A. Vergauwe, J. George, T. Chervy, A. Shalabney, E. De- vaux, C. Genet, J. Moran, and T. W. Ebbesen, Tilt- ing a Ground-State Reactivity Landscape by Vibrational Strong Coupling, Science363, 615 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Xiang, R

    B. Xiang, R. F. Ribeiro, M. Du, L. Chen, Z. Yang, J. Wang, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, Intermolecu- lar Vibrational Energy Transfer Enabled by Microcavity Strong Light–Matter Coupling, Science368, 665 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    T.-T. Chen, M. Du, Z. Yang, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, Cavity-enabled Enhancement of Ultrafast In- tramolecular Vibrational Redistribution over Pseudoro- tation, Science 378, 790 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    W. Ahn, J. F. Triana, F. Recabal, F. Herrera, and B. S. Simpkins, Modification of Ground-State Chemical Reac- tivity via Light–Matter Coherence in Infrared Cavities, Science 380, 1165 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    R. F. Ribeiro, L. A. Martínez-Martínez, M. Du, J. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Polari- ton Chemistry: Controlling Molecular Dynamics with Optical Cavities, Chem. Sci.9, 6325 (2018)

    2018

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Herrera and J

    F. Herrera and J. Owrutsky, Molecular Polaritons for Controlling Chemistry with Quantum Optics, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 100902 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    T. E. Li, B. Cui, J. E. Subotnik, and A. Nitzan, Molec- ular Polaritonics: Chemical Dynamics Under Strong Light–Matter Coupling, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.73, 43 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Fregoni, F

    J. Fregoni, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. Feist, Theoretical Challenges in Polaritonic Chemistry, ACS Photonics9, 1096 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    B. S. Simpkins, A. D. Dunkelberger, and I. Vurgaftman, Control, Modulation, and Analytical Descriptions of Vi- brational Strong Coupling, Chem. Rev.123, 5020 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    Mandal, M

    A. Mandal, M. A. Taylor, B. M. Weight, E. R. Koessler, X. Li, and P. Huo, Theoretical Advances in Polariton Chemistry and Molecular Cavity Quantum Electrody- namics, Chem. Rev.123, 9786 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Ruggenthaler, D

    M. Ruggenthaler, D. Sidler, and A. Rubio, Understand- ing Polaritonic Chemistry from Ab Initio Quantum Elec- trodynamics, Chem. Rev.123, 11191 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Xiang and W

    B. Xiang and W. Xiong, Molecular Polaritons for Chem- istry, Photonics and Quantum Technologies, Chem. Rev. 124, 2512 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    A.D.Dunkelberger, B.T.Spann, K.P.Fears, B.S.Simp- kins, and J. C. Owrutsky, Modified Relaxation Dynamics and Coherent Energy Exchange in Coupled Vibration- Cavity Polaritons, Nat. Commun.7, 1 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Xiang, R

    B. Xiang, R. F. Ribeiro, A. D. Dunkelberger, J. Wang, Y. Li, B. S. Simpkins, J. C. Owrutsky, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, Two-dimensional Infrared Spectroscopy of Vibrational Polaritons, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.115, 4845 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    A. B. Grafton, A. D. Dunkelberger, B. S. Simpkins, J. F. Triana, F. J. Hernández, F. Herrera, and J. C. Owrutsky, Excited-State Vibration-Polariton Transitions and Dy- namics in Nitroprusside, Nat. Commun.12, 214 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    C. G. Pyles, B. S. Simpkins, I. Vurgaftman, J. C. Owrut- sky, and A. D. Dunkelberger, Revisiting Cavity-coupled 2DIR: A Classical Approach Implicates Reservoir Modes, J. Chem. Phys.161, 234202 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Xiang and W

    B. Xiang and W. Xiong, Molecular Vibrational Polari- ton: Its Dynamics and Potentials in Novel Chemistry and Quantum Technology, J. Chem. Phys.155, 050901 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Schwennicke, A

    K. Schwennicke, A. Koner, J. B. Pérez-Sánchez, W. Xiong, N. C. Giebink, M. L. Weichman, and J. Yuen- Zhou, When Do Molecular Polaritons Behave like Op- tical Filters?, arXiv , DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.05036 (accessed 2024 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    Hirschmann, H

    O. Hirschmann, H. H. Bhakta, and W. Xiong, The role of IR inactive mode in W(CO)6 polariton relaxation pro- cess, Nanophotonics 13, 2029 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    T. E. Li, J. E. Subotnik, and A. Nitzan, Cavity Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Liquid Water under Vibrational Ultrastrong Coupling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.117, 18324 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    T. E. Li, A. Nitzan, and J. E. Subotnik, Cavity Molec- ular Dynamics Simulations of Vibrational Polariton- Enhanced Molecular Nonlinear Absorption, J. Chem. Phys. 154, 094124 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    T. E. Li, A. Nitzan, and J. E. Subotnik, Energy-Efficient Pathway for Selectively Exciting Solute Molecules to High Vibrational States via Solvent Vibration-Polariton Pumping, Nat. Commun.13, 4203 (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    T. E. Li, A. Nitzan, and J. E. Subotnik, Polariton Re- laxation under Vibrational Strong Coupling: Comparing Cavity Molecular Dynamics Simulations against Fermi’s 10 Golden Rule Rate, J. Chem. Phys.156, 134106 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Galego, C

    J. Galego, C. Climent, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. Feist, Cavity Casimir-Polder Forces and Their Effects in Ground-State Chemical Reactivity, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021057 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    F. J. Hernández and F. Herrera, Multi-level Quantum Rabi Model for Anharmonic Vibrational Polaritons, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 144116 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    J. A. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, R. F. Ribeiro, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Resonant Catalysis of Thermally Acti- vated Chemical Reactions with Vibrational Polaritons, Nat. Commun. 10, 4685 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    N. M. Hoffmann, L. Lacombe, A. Rubio, and N. T. Maitra, Effect of Many Modes on Self-Polarization and Photochemical Suppression in Cavities, J. Chem. Phys. 153, 104103 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Botzung, D

    T. Botzung, D. Hagenmüller, S. Schütz, J. Dubail, G. Pupillo, and J. Schachenmayer, Dark state semilo- calization of quantum emitters in a cavity, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144202 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    X. Li, A. Mandal, and P. Huo, Cavity Frequency- Dependent Theory for Vibrational Polariton Chemistry, Nat. Commun. 12, 1315 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    E. W. Fischer and P. Saalfrank, Ground State Properties and Infrared Spectra of Anharmonic Vibrational Polari- tons of Small Molecules in Cavities, J. Chem. Phys.154, 104311 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    P. Y. Yang and J. Cao, Quantum Effects in Chemical Re- actionsunderPolaritonicVibrationalStrongCoupling,J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 9531 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    D. S. Wang, T. Neuman, S. F. Yelin, and J. Flick, Cavity- Modified Unimolecular Dissociation Reactions via In- tramolecular Vibrational Energy Redistribution, J. Phys. Chem. Lett 13, 3317 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Flick, M

    J. Flick, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, Atoms and Molecules in Cavities, from Weak to Strong Coupling in Quantum-Electrodynamics (QED) Chem- istry, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.114, 3026 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    R. R. Riso, T. S. Haugland, E. Ronca, and H. Koch, Molecular Orbital Theory in Cavity QED Environments, Nat. Commun. 13, 1368 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Schäfer, J

    C. Schäfer, J. Flick, E. Ronca, P. Narang, and A. Ru- bio, Shining Light on the Microscopic Resonant Mech- anism Responsible for Cavity-Mediated Chemical Reac- tivity, Nat. Commun.13, 7817 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Bonini and J

    J. Bonini and J. Flick, Ab Initio Linear-Response Approach to Vibro-polaritons in the Cavity Born- Oppenheimer Approximation, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 2764 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    J. Yang, Q. Ou, Z. Pei, H. Wang, B. Weng, Z. Shuai, K. Mullen, and Y. Shao, Quantum-Electrodynamical Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory within Gaussian Atomic Basis, J. Chem. Phys. 155, 064107 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Rosenzweig, N

    B. Rosenzweig, N. M. Hoffmann, L. Lacombe, and N. T. Maitra, Analysis of the Classical Trajectory Treatment of Photon Dynamics for Polaritonic Phenomena, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 054101 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    J. F. Triana, F. J. Hernández, and F. Herrera, The Shape of the Electric Dipole Function Determines the Sub- picosecond Dynamics of Anharmonic Vibrational Polari- tons, J. Chem. Phys.152, 234111 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    T. S. Haugland, E. Ronca, E. F. Kjønstad, A. Rubio, and H. Koch, Coupled Cluster Theory for Molecular Polari- tons: Changing Ground and Excited States, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041043 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    J. P. Philbin, T. S. Haugland, T. K. Ghosh, E. Ronca, M. Chen, P. Narang, and H. Koch, Molecular van der Waals Fluids in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 8988 (2023), arXiv:2209.07956

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Y. R. Poh, S. Pannir-Sivajothi, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Un- derstanding the Energy Gap Law under Vibrational Strong Coupling, J. Phys. Chem. C 127, 5491 (2023), arXiv:2210.04986

    2023 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Suyabatmaz and R

    E. Suyabatmaz and R. F. Ribeiro, Vibrational Polari- ton Transport in Disordered Media, J. Chem. Phys.159, 034701 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Yu and J

    Q. Yu and J. M. Bowman, Fully Quantum Simulation of Polaritonic Vibrational Spectra of Large Cavity-Molecule System, J. Chem. Theory Comput.20, 4278 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Xiang, R

    B. Xiang, R. F. Ribeiro, L. Chen, J. Wang, M. Du, J. Yuen-Zhou, and W. Xiong, State-Selective Polariton to Dark State Relaxation Dynamics, J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 5918 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    R. F. Ribeiro, J. A. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, N. C. Giebink, W. Xiong, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Enhanced Opti- cal Nonlinearities under Collective Strong Light-Matter Coupling, Phys. Rev. A103, 063111 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    A. D. Wright, J. C. Nelson, and M. L. Weichman, Rovibrational Polaritons in Gas-Phase Methane, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 5982 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    M. F. Crawford, H. L. Welsh, and J. H. Harrold, Ro- tational Wings Of Raman Bands And Free Rotation In Liquid Oxygen, Nitrogen, And Methane, Can. J. Phys. 30, 81 (1952)

    1952

  44. [52]

    Chapados and A

    C. Chapados and A. Cabana, Infrared Spectra and Struc- tures of Solid CH4 and CD4 in Phases I and II, Can. J. Phys. 50, 3521 (1972)

    1972

  45. [53]

    Sun, COMPASS: An ab Initio Force-Field Optimized for Condensed-Phase Applications: Overview with De- tails on Alkane and Benzene Compounds, J

    H. Sun, COMPASS: An ab Initio Force-Field Optimized for Condensed-Phase Applications: Overview with De- tails on Alkane and Benzene Compounds, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 7338 (1998)

    1998

  46. [54]

    M. Veit, S. K. Jain, S. Bonakala, I. Rudra, D. Hohl, and G. Csányi, Equation of State of Fluid Methane from First Principles with Machine Learning Potentials, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 2574 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    V. L. Deringer, A. P. Bartók, N. Bernstein, D. M. Wilkins, M. Ceriotti, and G. Csányi, Gaussian Process Regression for Materials and Molecules, Chem. Rev.121, 10073 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolin- tineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, and S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS-AFlexibleSimulationToolforParticle-based Materials ...

    2022

  49. [57]

    Litman, V

    Y. Litman, V. Kapil, Y. M. Feldman, D. Tisi, T. Be- gušić, K. Fidanyan, G. Fraux, J. Higer, M. Kellner, T. E. Li, E. S. Pós, E. Stocco, G. Trenins, B. Hirshberg, M. Rossi, and M. Ceriotti, i-PI 3.0: A Flexible and Effi- cient Framework for Advanced Atomistic Simulations, J. Ch...

    2024

  50. [58]

    D. A. McQuarrie,Statistical Mechanics (Harper-Collins Publish- ers, New York, 1976)

    1976

  51. [59]

    Gaigeot and M

    M.-P. Gaigeot and M. Sprik, Ab Initio Molecular Dynam- ics Computation of the Infrared Spectrum of Aqueous Uracil, J. Phys. Chem. B107, 10344 (2003). 11

    2003

  52. [60]

    Habershon, G

    S. Habershon, G. S. Fanourgakis, and D. E. Manolopou- los, Comparison of Path Integral Molecular Dynamics Methods for the Infrared Absorption Spectrum of Liq- uid Water, J. Chem. Phys.129, 074501 (2008)

    2008

  53. [61]

    W. H. J. Childs and H. A. J. Ahn, A New Coriolis Per- turbation in the Methane Spectrum III. Intensities and Optical Spectrum, Proc. R. soc. Lond. Ser. A169, 451 (1939)

    1939

  54. [62]

    Robiette and I

    A. Robiette and I. Mills, Intensity Perturbations due to ν3/ν4 Coriolis Interaction in Methane, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 77, 48 (1979)

    1979

  55. [63]

    R. H. Tipping, A. Brown, Q. Ma, J. M. Hartmann, C. Boulet, and J. Liévin, Collision-induced Absorption in the ν2 Fundamental Band of CH4. I. Determination of the Quadrupole Transition Moment, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 8852 (2001)

    2001

  56. [64]

    W. Ying, M. E. Mondal, and P. Huo, Theory and quan- tum dynamics simulations of exciton-polariton motional narrowing, J. Chem. Phys.161, 064105 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    Groenhof, C

    G. Groenhof, C. Climent, J. Feist, D. Morozov, and J. J. Toppari, Tracking Polariton Relaxation with Multiscale Molecular Dynamics Simulations, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 5476 (2019)

    2019

  58. [66]

    B. X. K. Chng, W. Ying, Y. Lai, A. N. Vamivakas, S. T. Cundiff, T. D. Krauss, and P. Huo, Mechanism of Molecular Polariton Decoherence in the Collective Light–Matter Couplings Regime, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 11773 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Lazzeretti, R

    P. Lazzeretti, R. Zanasi, A. Sadlej, and W. Raynes, Mag- netizability and Carbon-13 Shielding Surfaces for the Methane Molecule, Mol. Phys.62, 605 (1987)

    1987

  60. [68]

    Wang and T

    X.-G. Wang and T. Carrington, Deficiencies of the Bend Symmetry Coordinates Used for Methane, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 6260 (2003)

    2003

  61. [69]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum Fluids of Light, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 299 (2013)

    2013

  62. [70]

    Bhuyan, J

    R. Bhuyan, J. Mony, O. Kotov, G. W. Castellanos, J. Gómez Rivas, T. O. Shegai, and K. Börjesson, The Rise and Current Status of Polaritonic Photochemistry and Photophysics, Chem. Rev.123, 10877 (2023). Supplementary Information Selective Excitation of IR-Inactive Modes via Vib...

    2023

  63. [71]

    Contribution from intermolecular dipole-dipole interactions S6

  64. [72]

    The rate of UP v4 energy transfer to v2 IR-inactive modes S9

    Contribution from intramolecular v4 anharmonic interactions S8 B. The rate of UP v4 energy transfer to v2 IR-inactive modes S9

  65. [73]

    Contribution from direct intramolecular v4-v2 anharmonic interactions S9

  66. [74]

    Brief review of CavMD S11 III

    Contribution from Coriolis interactions between v2 and v4 transitions S10 II. Brief review of CavMD S11 III. Simulation details S13 A. Equilibrium simulations S14 B. Polariton pumping simulations S14 C. Linear-response polariton spectra S15 D. Time-resolved CH 4 bending spectr...

  67. [75]

    Contribution from intermolecular dipole-dipole interactions Following Ref. [S1], we express the intermolecular dipole-dipole coupling between v4 transitions in neighboring CH 4 molecules using the following tight-binding form: ˆVdd = N∑ n=1 ℏ∆n [ Nnn∑ Mn=1 ( ˆb† nˆbMn + ˆbnˆb†...

  68. [76]

    Contribution from intramolecular v4 anharmonic interactions The above derivation demonstrates that intermolecular dipole-dipole interactions between local v4 transitions can induce the UP v4 dephasing into v4 dark modes. Similarly, because each CH4 molecule contains three dege...

  69. [77]

    Contribution from direct intramolecular v4-v2 anharmonic interactions Analogous to Eq. (S17), we may express the direct intramolecular v4-v2 anharmonic interactions as ˆV24 = 2N/3∑ n=1 ℏξ24 [ Nnn∑ Mn=1 ( ˆc† nˆc† nˆcnˆbMn + ˆcnˆcnˆc† nˆb† Mn )] , (S21a) = 2N/3∑ n=1 ℏξ24√ N [ N...

  70. [78]

    Contribution from Coriolis interactions between v2 and v4 transitions Apart from the direct intramolecular anharmonic coupling between the v2 and v4 transi- tions, Coriolis interactions can also induce the rovibrational coupling between the v2 and v4 S10 transitions [S4–S6]: ˆ...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.