Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 58 references

Unpolarized prethermal discrete time crystal

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A time-crystal signal can appear in a completely unpolarized quantum state.

desk verdict Genuinely new unpolarized prethermal DTC mechanism with a clean derivation; the exponential-lifetime and no-classical-counterpart claims are under-supported but the core is sound. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09461 v3 pith:HE4VM5I4 submitted 2025-01-16 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.atom-phquant-ph

Takeru Yokota , Tatsuhiko N. Ikeda This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechphysics.atom-phquant-ph MSC 81Q1082B1082C10 PACS 05.30.-d03.65.-w05.45.-a
keywords prethermaldiscretetimecrystalunpolarizedDTCautocorrelationFloquetprethermalizationtrapped-ionquantumsimulatortransverse-fieldIsingmodelstaggeredmagnetizationfluctuations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts a new class of prethermal discrete time crystals, called unpolarized prethermal DTCs (UPDTCs), that function without any net uniform or staggered magnetization. The central claim is that in a trapped-ion-style spin chain driven by periodic π-pulses, the stroboscopic autocorrelation of the staggered magnetization shows period-doubled oscillations even when the magnetization expectation value is zero for the effective ground state. The signal appears in both the antiferromagnetic and paramagnetic phases of the effective Ising Hamiltonian, and its lifetime grows exponentially with driving frequency, the hallmark of Floquet prethermalization. A sympathetic reader would care because this suggests a fundamentally quantum, fluctuation-driven mechanism for time-crystalline order that does not rely on symmetry breaking or classical spin precession.

What carries the argument

The central object is the stroboscopic autocorrelation function $C(nT)=\langle M^{\rm st}_x(nT)M^{\rm st}_x\rangle_\psi/N^2$ of the staggered magnetization $M^{\rm st}_x$, together with the leading-order Floquet effective Hamiltonian $H_{\rm eff}^{(0)}$ (a transverse-field Ising model). The key identity is Eq. (10), which expresses $C(nT)$ as $(-1)^n\sum_{m\ge1} e^{-inT\Delta E_{0m}}|\langle E_m|E_0'\rangle|^2$, so the signal is carried by the many-body wavefunction overlap between $|E_0'\rangle$ and the first excited state $|E_1\rangle$. This overlap being near unity is what converts the absence of polarization into a DTC-like autocorrelation signal.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of $C(nT)$ in a trapped-ion experiment at $B_y/J_0=0.6$ with $TJ_0=0.1$ should show a clear peak at $\omega T/2\pi = 1/2 - \Delta E_{01}T/2\pi$ in the Fourier spectrum of the autocorrelation; if the signal instead shows multiple peaks or decays within tens of periods while the frequency is raised, the UPDTC claim would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a periodically driven long-range Ising chain with π-pulses, starting from the unpolarized ground state $|E_0\rangle$ of the leading-order effective Hamiltonian, the staggered-magnetization autocorrelation obeys $C(nT)\approx(-1)^n e^{-in\Omega T} f(n)$, with $\Omega\approx\Delta E_{01}$ and $f(n)$ slowly decaying. In a rotating frame this becomes $C_{\rm rot}(nT)\approx(-1)^n f(n)$, a standard DTC signal, even though $\langle E_0|M^{\rm st}_x|E_0\rangle=0$. The signal persists in the paramagnetic phase where Néel-state SSB PDTCs decay, and it is exponentially long-lived as the drive frequency increases, indicating Floquet prethermalization. The origin is the near-equality $|E_0'\rangle = M^{\rm st}_x|E_0\rangle/\|M^{\rm st}_x|E_0\rangle\|\approx|E_1\rangle$, which holds with overlap above 81% across parameters and does not vanish in the large-system limit.

Load-bearing premise

The leading-order effective Hamiltonian $H_{\rm eff}^{(0)}$ accurately governs the stroboscopic dynamics over the entire simulated time window, meaning the $O(T^2)$ Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff corrections stay negligible for thousands of drive periods.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The DTC-like signal should be observable in current trapped-ion quantum simulators by measuring Im$C(nT)$ via the proposed Ramsey-type protocol with local $\pi/4$ rotations.
  • UPDTCs extend prethermal time crystals to a regime where no symmetry breaking occurs, so they avoid the Landau–Peierls obstruction to finite-temperature SSB in short-range 1D systems.
  • The exponential lifetime scaling with drive frequency means higher driving frequency directly produces longer-lived UPDTC signals in both magnetic phases, not just the ordered phase.
  • The signal survives moderate disorder in the magnetic fields, suggesting robustness against experimental imperfections.
  • The effect is qualitatively independent of interaction range, appearing for both long-range and nearest-neighbor Ising interactions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The near-unit overlap $|\langle E_1|E_0'\rangle|^2 > 8/\pi^2$ suggests a general mechanism: any Hamiltonian whose ground state is connected to its first excited state by a single-spin-flip-like operator will exhibit UPDTC-like autocorrelation signals under the right periodic drive.
  • This could be tested experimentally at larger system sizes or in other platforms (e.g., Rydberg arrays) by checking whether $C(nT)$ in the paramagnetic phase shows the predicted $\omega = \pi/T - \Delta E_{01}$ peak in the Fourier spectrum.
  • The duality described in the paper implies that one could also observe the same signal by preparing slightly polarized states $|\tilde{\pm},\phi\rangle$ and measuring the magnetization itself, effectively trading polarization for autocorrelation, which may be easier to implement experimentally.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces 'unpolarized prethermal discrete time crystals' (UPDTCs): for a periodically driven long-range Ising chain with applied π-pulses, the stroboscopic autocorrelation C(nT) of the staggered magnetization is claimed to show period-doubled, exponentially long-lived oscillations even when the state itself is the unpolarized ground state |E0> of the effective transverse-field Ising Hamiltonian. The central result, Eq. (7), is C(nT) ≈ (-1)^n e^{-inΩT} f(n) with Ω ≈ ΔE01, so that in a rotating frame C_rot(nT) ≈ (-1)^n f(n), i.e., a DTC-like signal. The mechanism is the near-exact relation |E'_0> = Mst_x|E0>/||Mst_x|E0>|| ≈ |E1>. The paper presents exact-diagonalization and quantum-circuit simulations for L=21, spectral analysis, a perturbation-theoretic overlap calculation in Appendix H, and a trapped-ion experimental proposal. The central derivation of Eq. (10) from a Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff decomposition in Appendix G is clean, and the overlap analysis is both numerical and analytic.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a conceptually new incarnation of prethermal DTC order: subharmonic response can be carried by quantum fluctuations of an order parameter whose expectation value vanishes, and the signal persists in the paramagnetic phase where the conventional Néeel-state prethermal DTC does not. The paper's strongest technical assets are the explicit derivation of Eq. (10), the analytic overlap bound in Appendix H showing |<E1|E'_0>|² > 8/π² in the thermodynamic limit, and the careful Trotter-convergence check in Appendix B. These are concrete and falsifiable. The main weakness is that a few headline claims, especially 'no classical counterpart' and 'exponentially long-lived', are asserted beyond what the simulations and the cited prethermalization theorems directly support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III B, Appendix G, Eq. (G4)] The central formula (10) and the exponential-lifetime claim both rest on replacing (U2U1)^n by e^{i(1-(-1)^n)/2 T Bz Mz} e^{-inT H_eff^(0)} Pπ^n + O(T^2). In Eq. (G3) the O(T^2) remainder is the leading Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff truncation per two-period block. At the longest simulated times in Fig. 3, n up to 300/(T J0), the naive accumulated error is O(n T^2 J0^2) = O(300 T J0), which at T J0 = 0.1 is O(30), not small. The paper does not bound this remainder, nor does it present a fixed-total-time T-sweep showing that Eq. (7) remains accurate over the whole window. Because the model has long-range interactions J_ij = J0/|i-j|, the local prethermalization theorems [49]-[53] invoked in Sec. III B do not directly apply; the argument instead leans on Ref. [54]. I request an explicit check, numerical or analytic, that higher-order Floquet-Magnus corrections do not dephase the overlap |E'_0> ≈ |E1> before the reported lifetimes, and a clear statement of which prethermalization result covers the power-law case.
  2. [Abstract, Secs. I and VI] The abstract and conclusions state that the UPDTC has 'no classical counterpart' and is 'not explained by the classical picture of flipping spins but by quantum fluctuations.' No classical spin simulation or classical no-go argument is provided anywhere in the manuscript. Since Refs. [44]-[46] establish classical prethermal DTCs in related settings, this is a load-bearing claim for the novelty of the mechanism. The authors should either add a classical simulation (e.g., the same Hamiltonian with classical vector spins, measuring the same autocorrelation) or weaken the claim to 'the derivation here is quantum mechanical and does not rely on the mean-field precession picture.'
  3. [Sec. III B, Appendix D, Fig. 8] The conclusion that the UPDTC signal is 'exponentially long-lived in the high-frequency driving regime' is inferred from the threshold time n0.8 at L = 21 over roughly one decade of 1/T. A threshold time is not the same as an asymptotic decay rate, and without L-scaling one cannot exclude finite-size revivals or a stretched-exponential decay that happens to look exponential over this range. I recommend adding a finite-size study (e.g., comparing L = 15, 21, and 27 where numerically feasible) and fitting the actual decay rate of |C(nT)|, rather than only the crossing time n0.8.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B, Eq. (B6)] The interaction factor in the Trotter decomposition is written as e^{-iδJ_ij σx_i σy_i}; from Eq. (B7) and the definition of the model it should be e^{-iδJ_ij σx_i σx_j}. This typo should be corrected for reproducibility.
  2. [Appendix G, Eqs. (G2)-(G3)] The relation Pπ e^{-iT(H0+BzMz)} = e^{-iT(H0-BzMz)} Pπ is exact (up to an overall phase) because Pπ unitarily maps H0+BzMz to H0-BzMz; the O(T^2) error first appears in Eq. (G3) when the two exponentials e^{-iT(H0-BzMz)} and e^{-iT(H0+BzMz)} are combined by BCH. Labeling Eq. (G2) as O(T^2) is misleading and should be corrected.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption writes '1/T J0' where the intended frequency is 1/(T J0); the same notation appears in Figs. 3 and 8 and should be disambiguated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (10) is a controlled BCH expansion, Ω≈ΔE01 is an independent eigen-gap match, and Ref. [54] is a minor self-citation that is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained. Eq. (10) follows from the BCH approximation in Appendix G, Eq. (G4); it is not an ansatz imposed to match the data. The observed frequency Ω is initially extracted from C(nT), but the paper then compares it with ΔE01 computed separately by exact diagonalization of H_eff^(0) (Table I and Fig. 4). This is a falsifiable check: the peak position tracks π/T − ΔE01 and not π/T − 2B_y, and the deviation shrinks as T decreases (Appendix F), so the match is not enforced by construction. The collapse of the spectral sum in Eq. (10) to a single dominant term is supported by the independent overlap calculation |⟨E1|E'_0⟩|^2 > 8/π² in Appendix H, including exact results at B_y=0 and a perturbative large-B_y derivation; the dominance is therefore not assumed. The rotating-frame representation (8) is a data-dependent presentation, but the nontrivial claim is that the required Ω equals ΔE01 independently, which is checked rather than fitted. The only author-overlap citation, Ref. [54], is used to motivate robustness of the effective ground state, but the exponential-lifetime claim is demonstrated by the paper's own numerics (Figs. 3 and 8) and by standard prethermalization references [49-53]; the self-citation is not load-bearing. Even if the O(nT²) BCH error accumulation and the long-range-versus-local validity of the theorems are correctness risks, they are not circular reductions. No equation or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction; the score reflects only the minor self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to force the result: model parameters (L, By, Bz, T) are physical simulation settings, and Ω is an output matched to an independently computed gap. The central derivation uses standard BCH and prethermalization assumptions rather than new postulated entities.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption For high drive frequency, the local Floquet dynamics prethermalizes under a local effective Hamiltonian and heating is exponentially slow.
    Invoked in Section III B and the conclusion to explain why the UGS signal lifetime grows exponentially with 1/T; supported by Refs. [49-52] but not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The unitary (U2U1)^n is well approximated by Eq. (G4), including neglect of O(T^2) BCH corrections over the simulated times.
    Equation (G4) underlies Eq. (10); the paper checks Trotter convergence but does not bound the accumulated BCH error.
  • domain assumption The ground state |E0> of H_eff^(0) can be prepared adiabatically by lowering By from a large value.
    Section V's experimental protocol assumes adiabatic passage is faithful; no fidelity estimate is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unpolarized prethermal discrete time crystal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HE4VM5I4

@misc{pith2026250109461,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unpolarized prethermal discrete time crystal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HE4VM5I4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09461}
}
read the original abstract

Prethermal discrete time crystals (DTCs) are a novel phase of periodically driven matter that exhibits robust subharmonic oscillations without requiring disorder. However, previous realizations of prethermal DTCs have relied on the presence of polarization, either spontaneous or induced. Here, we introduce a new class of prethermal DTCs termed ``unpolarized prethermal discrete time crystals'' (UPDTCs) that arise without any uniform/staggered polarization and propose an experiment to observe them in current trapped-ion quantum simulators. By studying a model of trapped ions using a quantum circuit simulator, we demonstrate that robust period-doubled dynamics can persist in the autocorrelation function of the staggered magnetization, even though its expectation value does not exhibit such dynamics. The period-doubled dynamics is not explained by the classical picture of flipping spins but by quantum fluctuations. We establish that UPDTCs are exponentially long-lived in the high-frequency driving regime, a hallmark of prethermalization. These results expand the known phenomenology and mechanism of prethermal time crystals and underscore the role of quantum effects in stabilizing novel nonequilibrium phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09461 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Setup and main results. (a) Illustration of our model. The direction of spin fluctuations along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Real and imaginary parts of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. The magnitude spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Results regarding the estimates of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Deviation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Results for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. DTC-like signal’s lifetime, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Signal at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Results about overlaps between states. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [49]

    D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, and F. Huveneers, Expo- nentially Slow Heating in Periodically Driven Many-Body Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 256803 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [53]

    Avdoshkin and A

    A. Avdoshkin and A. Dymarsky, Euclidean operator growth and quantum chaos, Physical Review Research 2, 43234 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [54]

    T. N. Ikeda, S. Sugiura, and A. Polkovnikov, Robust Ef- fective Ground State in a Nonintegrable Floquet Quan- tum Circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 030401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [44]

    Pizzi, A

    A. Pizzi, A. Nunnenkamp, and J. Knolle, Classical prethermal phases of matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 140602 (2021)

    2021

  5. [46]

    B. Ye, F. Machado, and N. Y. Yao, Floquet phases of matter via classical prethermalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [1]

    Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Physical review let- ters109, 160401 (2012)

    F. Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Physical review let- ters109, 160401 (2012)

    2012

  7. [2]

    Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: a no-go theorem, Physical review letters111, 070402 (2013)

    P. Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: a no-go theorem, Physical review letters111, 070402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [3]

    Watanabe and M

    H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Absence of quantum time crystals, Physical review letters114, 251603 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 58 references
  1. [4]

    Sacha and J

    K. Sacha and J. Zakrzewski, Time crystals: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics81, 016401 (2017)

    2017

  2. [5]

    Khemani, R

    V. Khemani, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, A brief 14 history of time crystals (2019), arXiv:1910.10745 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [6]

    Zhang, P

    J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I. D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature543, 217 (2017)

    2017

  4. [7]

    Machado, D

    F. Machado, D. V. Else, G. D. Kahanamoku-Meyer, C. Nayak, and N. Y. Yao, Long-Range Prethermal Phases of Nonequilibrium Matter, Physical Review X10, 11043 (2020)

    2020

  5. [8]

    Kyprianidis, F

    A. Kyprianidis, F. Machado, W. Morong, P. Becker, K. S. Collins, D. V. Else, L. Feng, P. W. Hess, C. Nayak, G. Pagano, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a prethermal discrete time crystal, Science372, 1192 (2021)

    2021

  6. [9]

    Ippoliti, K

    M. Ippoliti, K. Kechedzhi, R. Moessner, S. Sondhi, and V. Khemani, Many-body physics in the nisq era: Quan- tum programming a discrete time crystal, PRX Quantum 2, 030346 (2021)

    2021

  7. [10]

    Xiang, W

    L. Xiang, W. Jiang, Z. Bao, Z. Song, S. Xu, K. Wang, J. Chen, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Z. Zhu, F. Shen, N. Wang, C. Zhang, Y. Wu, Y. Zou, J. Zhong, Z. Cui, A. Zhang, Z. Tan, T. Li, Y. Gao, J. Deng, X. Zhang, H. Dong, P. Zhang, S. Jiang, W. Li, Z. Lu, Z.-Z. Sun, H. Li, Z. Wang, C. Song,...

    2024

  8. [11]

    Tindall, C

    J. Tindall, C. S. Mu˜ noz, B. Buˇ ca, and D. Jaksch, Quan- tum synchronisation enabled by dynamical symmetries and dissipation, New Journal of Physics22, 013026 (2020)

    2020

  9. [12]

    F. M. Gambetta, F. Carollo, M. Marcuzzi, J. P. Gar- rahan, and I. Lesanovsky, Discrete time crystals in the absence of manifest symmetries or disorder in open quan- tum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 015701 (2019)

    2019

  10. [13]

    H. Zhao, F. Mintert, and J. Knolle, Floquet time spi- rals and stable discrete-time quasicrystals in quasiperi- odically driven quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B100, 134302 (2019)

    2019

  11. [14]

    Goldman and J

    N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Periodically driven quan- tum systems: Effective Hamiltonians and engineered gauge fields, Physical Review X4, 1 (2014)

    2014

  12. [15]

    Holthaus, Floquet engineering with quasienergy bands of periodically driven optical lattices, J

    M. Holthaus, Floquet engineering with quasienergy bands of periodically driven optical lattices, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.49, 13001 (2015)

    2015

  13. [16]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineering, Ad- vances in Physics64, 139 (2015)

    2015

  14. [17]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 11004 (2017)

    2017

  15. [18]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet Engineering of Quan- tum Materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  16. [19]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet Time Crys- tals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 90402 (2016)

    2016

  17. [20]

    N. Y. Yao, A. C. Potter, I.-D. Potirniche, and A. Vish- wanath, Discrete time crystals: Rigidity, criticality, and realizations, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 030401 (2017)

    2017

  18. [21]

    D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Prethermal phases of matter protected by time-translation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X7, 011026 (2017)

    2017

  19. [22]

    D’Alessio and M

    L. D’Alessio and M. Rigol, Long-time Behavior of Iso- lated Periodically Driven Interacting Lattice Systems, Phys. Rev. X4, 41048 (2014)

    2014

  20. [23]

    Lazarides, A

    A. Lazarides, A. Das, and R. Moessner, Equilibrium states of generic quantum systems subject to periodic driving, Phys. Rev. E90, 12110 (2014)

    2014

  21. [24]

    H. Kim, T. N. Ikeda, and D. A. Huse, Testing whether all eigenstates obey the eigenstate thermalization hypothe- sis, Physical Review E90, 052105 (2014)

    2014

  22. [25]

    Holthaus and M

    M. Holthaus and M. E. Flatt´ e, Subharmonic generation in quantum systems, Physics Letters A187, 151 (1994)

    1994

  23. [26]

    Mizuta, K

    K. Mizuta, K. Takasan, M. Nakagawa, and N. Kawakami, Spatial-translation-induced discrete time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 093001 (2018)

    2018

  24. [27]

    Chinzei and T

    K. Chinzei and T. N. Ikeda, Time crystals protected by floquet dynamical symmetry in hubbard models, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 060601 (2020)

    2020

  25. [28]

    W. C. Yu, J. Tangpanitanon, A. W. Glaetzle, D. Jaksch, and D. G. Angelakis, Discrete time crystal in glob- ally driven interacting quantum systems without disor- der, Physical Review A99, 10.1103/physreva.99.033618 (2019)

    2019 doi

  26. [29]

    Lled´ o and M

    C. Lled´ o and M. H. Szyma´ nska, A dissipative time crystal with or without z2 symmetry breaking, New Journal of Physics22, 075002 (2020)

    2020

  27. [30]

    O’Sullivan, O

    J. O’Sullivan, O. Lunt, C. W. Zollitsch, M. L. W. The- walt, J. J. L. Morton, and A. Pal, Signatures of discrete time crystalline order in dissipative spin ensembles, New Journal of Physics22, 085001 (2020)

    2020

  28. [31]

    Kuro´ s, R

    A. Kuro´ s, R. Mukherjee, W. Golletz, F. Sauvage, K. Giergiel, F. Mintert, and K. Sacha, Phase diagram and optimal control for n-tupling discrete time crystal, New Journal of Physics22, 095001 (2020)

    2020

  29. [32]

    Pizzi, D

    A. Pizzi, D. Malz, G. De Tomasi, J. Knolle, and A. Nun- nenkamp, Time crystallinity and finite-size effects in clean Floquet systems, Physical Review B102, 214207 (2020)

    2020

  30. [33]

    S. Basu, D. P. Arovas, S. Gopalakrishnan, C. A. Hooley, and V. Oganesyan, Fisher zeros and persistent temporal oscillations in nonunitary quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013018 (2022)

    2022

  31. [34]

    Liu, S.-X

    S. Liu, S.-X. Zhang, C.-Y. Hsieh, S. Zhang, and H. Yao, Discrete time crystal enabled by stark many-body local- ization, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 120403 (2023)

    2023

  32. [35]

    W. Xie, M. Kolodrubetz, and V. Oganesyan, Effect of noise on quantum circuit realization of non-hermitian time crystals, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.06113 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  33. [36]

    W. Xie, M. Kolodrubetz, V. Oganeseyan, and D. P. Arovas, Effects of non-integrability in a non-hermitian time crystal, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04382 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  34. [37]

    Autti, V

    S. Autti, V. B. Eltsov, and G. E. Volovik, Observation of a time quasicrystal and its transition to a superfluid time crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 215301 (2018)

    2018

  35. [38]

    Autti, P

    S. Autti, P. J. Heikkinen, J. T. M¨ akinen, G. E. Volovik, V. V. Zavjalov, and V. B. Eltsov, Ac josephson effect between two superfluid time crystals, Nature Materials 20, 171 (2021)

    2021

  36. [39]

    Autti, P

    S. Autti, P. J. Heikkinen, J. Nissinen, J. T. M¨ akinen, G. E. Volovik, V. V. Zavyalov, and V. B. Eltsov, Nonlin- ear two-level dynamics of quantum time crystals, Nature Communications13, 3090 (2022)

    2022

  37. [40]

    Collura, A

    M. Collura, A. De Luca, D. Rossini, and A. Lerose, Dis- crete time-crystalline response stabilized by domain-wall 15 confinement, Phys. Rev. X12, 031037 (2022)

    2022

  38. [41]

    Gargiulo, G

    R. Gargiulo, G. Passarelli, P. Lucignano, and A. Rus- somanno, Swapping floquet time crystal, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174310 (2024)

    2024

  39. [42]

    D. J. Luitz, R. Moessner, S. Sondhi, and V. Khemani, Prethermalization without Temperature, Physical Re- view X10, 21046 (2020)

    2020

  40. [43]

    Stasiuk and P

    A. Stasiuk and P. Cappellaro, Observation of a prether- malu(1) discrete time crystal, Phys. Rev. X13, 041016 (2023)

    2023

  41. [45]

    Pizzi, A

    A. Pizzi, A. Nunnenkamp, and J. Knolle, Classical ap- proaches to prethermal discrete time crystals in one, two, and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B104, 094308 (2021)

    2021

  42. [47]

    Howell, P

    O. Howell, P. Weinberg, D. Sels, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Bukov, Asymptotic prethermalization in periodically driven classical spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 010602 (2019)

    2019

  43. [48]

    Koffel, M

    T. Koffel, M. Lewenstein, and L. Tagliacozzo, Entangle- ment entropy for the long-range ising chain in a trans- verse field, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 267203 (2012)

    2012

  44. [50]

    T. Mori, T. Kuwahara, and K. Saito, Rigorous Bound on Energy Absorption and Generic Relaxation in Periodi- cally Driven Quantum Systems, Physical Review Letters 116, 1 (2016)

    2016

  45. [51]

    Kuwahara, T

    T. Kuwahara, T. Mori, and K. Saito, Floquet-Magnus theory and generic transient dynamics in periodically driven many-body quantum systems, Annals of Physics 367, 96 (2016)

    2016

  46. [52]

    D. A. Abanin, W. De Roeck, W. W. Ho, and F. Hu- veneers, Effective Hamiltonians, prethermalization, and slow energy absorption in periodically driven many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B95, 14112 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Weinberg and M

    P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, QuSpin: a Python Pack- age for Dynamics and Exact Diagonalisation of Quantum Many Body Systems part I: spin chains, SciPost Phys.2, 3 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    Weinberg and M

    P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, QuSpin: a Python package for dynamics and exact diagonalisation of quantum many body systems. Part II: bosons, fermions and higher spins, SciPost Physics7, 20 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Suzuki, Y

    Y. Suzuki, Y. Kawase, Y. Masumura, Y. Hiraga, M. Nakadai, J. Chen, K. M. Nakanishi, K. Mitarai, R. Imai, S. Tamiya, T. Yamamoto, T. Yan, T. Kawakubo, Y. O. Nakagawa, Y. Ibe, Y. Zhang, H. Yamashita, H. Yoshimura, A. Hayashi, and K. Fujii, Qulacs: a fast and versatile quantum ci...

    2021

  50. [58]

    L. D. Landau, On the theory of phase transitions, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.7, 19 (1937)

    1937

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.