Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 8 minor 1 cited by

Gravitational waves and dark matter with Witten effect

T0 review · 4 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that hidden topological monopoles produced when a dark SU(2) symmetry breaks can serve as dark matter, give the axion a mass through the Witten effect, and generate nanohertz gravitational waves.

desk verdict Monopole DM and sub-GeV phase-transition GW parts are fine, but the axion abundance and domain-wall GW claims are overestimated because the Witten-effect mass is treated as constant while Eq. (3.10) makes it redshift away. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09596 v1 pith:X47OJTM6 submitted 2025-01-16 hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-th

Ruiyu Zhou , Ligong Bian This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords darksectorhiddenmonopolesWitteneffectaxionmatterfirst-orderphasetransitiongravitationalwavebackgroundpulsartimingarraysradiation
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a dark sector with an $SU(2)_d$ gauge symmetry that undergoes a first-order phase transition after the axion's global symmetry has broken. It claims that hidden monopoles formed when vacuum bubbles collide can be dark matter if the transition happens near $T_p \sim 10^8$ GeV (the sub-EeV scenario), with monopole masses around $10^{10}$ GeV. Through the Witten effect, those monopoles give the axion an additional mass between $10^{-5}$ GeV and $10^{-1}$ GeV, larger than the usual QCD contribution, which opens a viable cold-dark-matter window for the axion. The same model produces stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds from the dark phase transition and from axionic domain wall collapse, peaking in the nanohertz band where pulsar timing arrays report a low-frequency signal. The reason to care is that one dark sector is asked to explain dark matter, the axion mass, and the gravitational wave observations at once.

What carries the argument

The central object is the hidden 't Hooft-Polyakov monopole produced as $SU(2)_d$ breaks to $U(1)_d$; its mass and abundance are computed from the bubble nucleation rate and the relation $n_M=p n_b$. The load-bearing identity is the Witten-effect axion mass formula $m^2_{a,M}\simeq 2\beta n_M(T)/f_a$, with $\beta=e'^2/(128\pi^3 r_c f_a)$, which turns the monopole density into an axion mass and thereby into axion dark matter in the post-inflation scenario. The calculation also relies on the thermal effective potential, the bounce action $S_3$ that fixes the percolation temperature $T_p$, and the standard gravitational-wave templates for bubble collisions, sound waves, turbulence, and domain wall collapse.

What would settle it

A measurement or first-principles computation of the monopole production fraction $p$ and of the monopole annihilation cross section in the hidden plasma would settle the dark matter and axion-mass claims: if $p\ll 0.1$ or if annihilation depletes $n_M$, the predicted relic density and the Witten-effect axion mass fall below observation. Alternatively, a future pulsar-timing-array limit that excludes the predicted benchmark gravitational-wave spectra at nanohertz frequencies would rule out the scenario as an explanation of the observed low-frequency signal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the sub-EeV scenario, the hidden monopoles from the breaking $SU(2)_d\to U(1)_d$ have mass $m_M\sim 4\pi T_p\sim 10^{10}$ GeV, and their number density after bubble collisions is $n_M = p\,n_b$ with $p\sim 0.1$; this yields a relic density that can account for the observed dark matter. The interaction with the axion, the Witten effect, is controlled by the coupling $\mathcal{L}_\theta = -e'^2/(32\pi^2)(a/f_a)F'\tilde F'$, which makes the hidden monopoles acquire electric charge and induces an effective axion mass $m^2_{a,M}\simeq 2\beta n_M(T)/f_a$ with $\beta=e'^2/(128\pi^3 r_c f_a)$. In the sub-EeV scenario this monopole-induced mass ranges from $10^{-5}$ GeV to $10^{-1}$ GeV and exceeds the QCD instanton contribution $m_{a,QCD}\sim 5.70\,\mu\text{eV}\times 10^{16}$ GeV$/f_a$. Depending on the axion decay constant, axions radiated by cosmic strings or emitted by collapsing domain walls can match the dark matter relic density, while in the sub-GeV scenario neither the monopole dark matter nor a significant Witten-effect mass survives.

Load-bearing premise

The monopole number density is set by $n_M=p n_b$ with $p\sim 0.1$, and monopole-antimonopole annihilation is neglected because the mean free path is assumed to exceed the capture radius; if the production fraction is smaller or annihilation is efficient, both the monopole relic density and the Witten-effect axion mass drop and the dark matter and axion results weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the sub-EeV transition is realized, hidden monopoles with mass near $10^{10}$ GeV can constitute all or most of the dark matter; the heavier points in the viable parameter space are already excluded by the observed relic density.
  • The Witten effect sets the axion mass in the range $10^{-5}$-$10^{-1}$ GeV, dominating the QCD contribution, so axion cold dark matter is viable; cosmic-string-produced axions work for small decay constants ($f_a\sim 10^9$-$10^{10}$ GeV) while domain-wall-produced axions match observations for large decay constants ($f_a\sim 10^{11}$-$10^{12}$ GeV).
  • The gravitational wave background from the sub-GeV dark phase transition and that from the sub-EeV domain wall collapse both peak in the nanohertz range, offering a potential explanation for the low-frequency common-spectrum signal reported by pulsar timing arrays.
  • The dark sector contributes $\Delta N_{\rm eff}\sim 0.4$-$0.5$ of dark radiation in both scenarios, which the paper notes could alleviate the Hubble tension.
  • The domain walls must decay before Big Bang nucleosynthesis, which sets a lower bound on the explicit symmetry-breaking bias $\Delta V$ and, with the requirement $\Delta V\ll V$, defines the allowed parameter window.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If a lattice or analytic computation of monopole production during bubble collisions finds $p$ substantially below $0.1$, or if monopole-antimonopole annihilation is efficient, the monopole relic density and the Witten-effect axion mass both drop in proportion and the dark-matter conclusions would close; the paper assumes the mean free path exceeds the capture radius.
  • A full spectral fit of the predicted gravitational-wave background (phase transition plus domain walls) against the pulsar-timing-array data would constrain $g_d$ and $\lambda_\phi$ more sharply than the benchmark curves shown here, which only demonstrate spectral overlap.
  • The predicted $\Delta N_{\rm eff}\sim 0.4$-$0.5$ could be tested by future measurements of the cosmic microwave background damping tail, which would distinguish this dark sector from models that predict no dark radiation.
  • The paper leaves for future work the possibility that domain-wall collapse generates the baryon asymmetry; quantifying that mechanism in this model would connect the gravitational wave signal to baryogenesis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: In the sub-EeV scenario, the hidden monopoles from the breaking $SU(2)_d\to U(1)_d$ have mass $m_M\sim 4\pi T_p\sim 10^{10}$ GeV, and their number density after bubble collisions is $n_M = p\,n_b$ with $p\sim 0.1$; this yields a relic density that can account for the observed dark matter. The interaction with the axion, the Witten effect, is controlled by the coupling $\mathcal{L}_\theta = -e'^2/(

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper studies a dark SU(2)_d sector with a PQ scalar and a triplet scalar, focusing on first-order phase transitions at sub-EeV (~10^8 GeV) and sub-GeV (~10^-1 GeV) scales. Hidden 't Hooft-Polyakov monopoles are produced by bubble collisions, and their number density is linked to the bubble density by a production probability p. The Witten effect gives the monopoles a coupling-induced contribution to the axion mass. The paper claims that in the sub-EeV scenario monopoles of mass ~10^10 GeV are viable dark matter, that the Witten-effect axion mass ~10^-3 GeV dominates the QCD contribution and makes axion cold dark matter viable, and that the gravitational waves from the dark phase transition and from axionic domain-wall collapse peak in the nanohertz band, possibly explaining the EPTA, PPTA, and NANOGrav signals. The sub-GeV case is used for phase-transition gravitational waves, with a smaller Witten effect.

Significance. The model is well motivated and the paper makes use of standard finite-temperature effective-potential techniques, numeric monopole profile solutions, and established formulae for the Witten-effect mass and for gravitational-wave spectra. The benchmark points and PTA comparisons are useful. If the axion-mass calculation were correct, the paper would provide a plausible multi-messenger dark-sector scenario. However, the central axion abundance and domain-wall gravitational-wave claims are based on treating the Witten-effect mass as a constant evaluated at T_p, although Eq. (3.10) makes it time dependent through n_M(T). This undermines the quantitative axion and domain-wall results. The monopole dark-matter estimate is more robust and is a positive feature of the paper.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.10)-(3.12)] The Witten-effect axion mass in Eq. (3.10) is evaluated at the percolation temperature T_p and then used as a fixed mass in the cosmic-string abundance formula Eq. (3.11), the domain-wall abundance formula Eq. (3.12), and the wall tension sigma_wall in Sec. 4.2. This is inconsistent with Eq. (3.10), because n_M redshifts as n_M proportional to a^-3 proportional to T^3 in the radiation era, so m_a,M(T) proportional to T^(3/2) after the transition. For a representative point with T_p = 4.8*10^8 GeV and m_a,M(T_p) = 10^-3 GeV, by T = 1 GeV the Witten contribution has fallen to roughly 10^-15 GeV, far below m_a,QCD = 5.7*10^-9 GeV quoted in Sec. 3 for f_a = 10^10 GeV. A mass that switches on at T_p and then decreases adiabatically does not give the same axion abundance as a constant mass: the comoving axion number density is conserved during adiabatic mass variation, so the final comoving energy density is suppressed by roughly m_a(late)/m_a(T_p) relative to a constant-mass treatment. The cited Ref. [103] is precisely about adiabatic suppression of the axion abundance due to hidden monopoles and should have been applied here. Consequently the Omega_a h^2 values in Fig. 5, the KSVZ/DFSZ conclusions, and the Sec. 5 claim that the Witten effect makes axions cold dark matter are not supported by the present calculation.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eqs. (4.13)-(4.16)] The domain-wall gravitational-wave calculation uses sigma_wall = c_a m_a,M f_a^2 with the same T_p Witten mass, but the walls collapse at t_dec = A sigma_wall / Delta V, at which time the monopole density has been diluted by many orders of magnitude. The tension entering the peak frequency, the peak amplitude, the BBN bound Eq. (4.16), and the decay time Eq. (4.15) should be computed with m_a,M evaluated at the collapse epoch, not at T_p. In addition, the bias Delta V used to produce the BM4-BM6 curves in Fig. 6 is not listed in Table 1 or stated in the text. Since f_peak and Omega_GW h^2 depend directly on Delta V in Eqs. (4.13)-(4.14), the right panel of Fig. 6 is not reproducible from the information given.
  3. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.1)] The monopole number density is set to n_M = p n_b with p of order 10^-1, but p is neither derived nor scanned. The monopole relic density in Eq. (3.8) is linear in n_M, while the Witten mass in Eq. (3.10) scales as n_M^(1/2), so the DM abundance in Fig. 3 and the axion-mass values in Fig. 4 scale directly with this unvalidated normalization. The paper should either derive p from the bubble-collision dynamics or present results for a range of p values, for example p = 10^-1, 10^-2, and 10^-4. Without this, the quantitative dark-matter and axion-mass claims are conditional on a single order-of-magnitude assumption.
  4. [Table 1] The benchmark points in Table 1 omit parameters that are needed to reproduce the plotted results. Eq. (3.1) depends on v_w and p, Eq. (3.8) depends on v_w and p, and Eqs. (4.13)-(4.14) depend on Delta V. Since none of these values is given for BM1-BM6, the curves in Figs. 3-6 and the claimed overlap with PTA data cannot be checked. Please include the complete parameter set used for each benchmark, including the assumed bubble-wall velocity and the bias term.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Eq. (2.1)] The thermal mass term -lambda T^2 |phi|^2 / 6 appears inside the zero-temperature Lagrangian; it should be part of the finite-temperature effective potential as in Appendix A, otherwise the notation suggests a T-dependent term in the tree-level Lagrangian.
  2. [After Eq. (2.1)] The charged gauge-boson mass is quoted as m_W' = g_d v_phi, but with the triplet VEV <phi^3> = v_phi the mass should be g_d v_phi, not g_d v_varphi.
  3. [Eq. (3.5)] The second term in the H equation, (2/xi) dH/dx, should read dH/dxi.
  4. [After Eq. (3.8)] The notation s_*(s_0) for entropy density is introduced but not used; the formula is expressed in terms of g_s, so either define s and use it or remove the definition.
  5. [Sec. 3 and Sec. 4.1] The parameter beta is used in Eq. (3.1) before it is defined; in Sec. 4.1 beta is defined through beta = H T d(S_3/T)/dT. Please define beta at first use and confirm that the same parameter appears in Eqs. (3.1), (3.8), and (4.4).
  6. [Sec. 4.2] The upper bound on the bias term is stated as Delta V much less than V, but V is never defined; please specify whether V is the potential-energy difference or the barrier height.
  7. [Eq. (A.1)] The phrase 'M Srenormalization' should read 'MS-bar renormalization'.
  8. [Eq. (3.12) and Sec. 4.2] The domain-wall number is written both as NDW and as N_DW; please use a single notation throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation chains external Witten-effect formulae, monopole-production inputs, and simulation constants into its predictions without defining any output in terms of itself.

full rationale

I walked the paper's claimed derivation chain from the dark SU(2)_d effective potential through monopole production, the Witten-effect axion mass, axion relic densities, and gravitational-wave spectra. The monopole number density is taken from ref. [88] (n_M = p n_b, p ~ 0.1), the monopole-mass and Witten-effect mass formulae from refs. [1, 103], and the axion string/domain-wall abundance formulae from refs. [68, 74]. None of these steps is defined in terms of the paper's target outputs; the same-group citations [68] and [74] supply simulation-derived constants (xi, epsilon, C_d, p) that are not fitted to the paper's own data or to the PTA/DM observations being compared. The monopole-production and no-annihilation assumptions are genuine physical assumptions, not circular reductions. The redshift behavior of n_M and m_a,M is a physics-consistency concern about the constant-mass treatment, but it is not a definitional or self-citational circularity. I therefore find no step where Eq. X equals Eq. Y by construction or where a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The quantitative results depend on several adopted rather than derived inputs: the monopole production probability and annihilation neglect set nM; the Witten-effect mass formula is imported from refs. 1 and 103; and the axion relic density formulas use simulation constants from the authors' own prior papers (refs. 68 and 74). Model parameters g_d, lambda_phi, lambda_phi_phi, v_phi, and v_w are scanned, fixed, or unspecified rather than predicted.

free parameters (8)
  • g_d (dark gauge coupling) = scanned roughly 0.4 to 1.0
    Chosen in the viable parameter scan; enters monopole mass, relic density, and gravitational wave spectra.
  • lambda_phi (dark scalar self-coupling) = scanned roughly 0 to 0.45
    Chosen in the viable parameter scan; controls the phase transition strength and benchmark points.
  • lambda_phi_phi (PQ-dark portal coupling) = benchmarks from 3.91e-26 to 5.407e-4
    Tuned to place the phase transition at sub-GeV or sub-EeV temperatures; spans many orders of magnitude.
  • v_phi (PQ symmetry breaking VEV) = 10^10 GeV, fixed
    Fixed for simplicity; sets the axion decay constant scale and the phase transition temperature window.
  • v_w (bubble wall velocity) = not stated
    Appears in the monopole number density, relic density, and gravitational wave power spectra, but its numerical value is never specified.
  • p (monopole production probability per bubble collision) = ~0.1
    Adopted from ref. 88; directly multiplies the monopole relic density and the Witten-effect axion mass.
  • xi, epsilon (axion string simulation parameters) = 0.37, 0.85
    Taken from ref. 68, which shares an author with this paper; used in the KSVZ cosmic-string axion abundance formula Eq. (3.11).
  • C_d, p_DW, N_DW (domain wall network parameters) = 100, 5/4, 3
    Taken from ref. 74, which shares an author with this paper; used in the DFSZ domain-wall axion abundance formula Eq. (3.12).
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Finite-temperature one-loop effective potential with daisy resummation adequately describes the SU(2)d phase transition.
    Used in Sec. 2, Eq. (2.2) and Appendix A; relies on standard thermal field theory but is a model-dependent truncation.
  • domain assumption Hidden 't Hooft-Polyakov monopoles form by bubble collisions at rate p ~ 0.1 per bubble.
    Sec. 3, Eq. (3.1), following ref. 88; not derived for this specific model.
  • domain assumption Monopole-antimonopole annihilation is negligible because the mean free path exceeds the capture radius.
    Sec. 3, citing ref. 98; load-bearing for the monopole number density and all subsequent results.
  • domain assumption The Witten-effect axion mass formula m_a,M^2 ~ 2 beta nM/fa applies to hidden monopoles with core size rc ~ 1/m_W'.
    Sec. 3, Eq. (3.10), imported from refs. 1 and 103; central to the axion mass conclusions.
  • domain assumption Post-inflationary PQ breaking creates global strings and axionic domain walls, with N_DW = 3 for the DFSZ axion.
    Secs. 1 and 3; standard axion cosmology, but N_DW = 3 is a model choice.
  • domain assumption Axion relic densities from cosmic strings and domain walls follow refs. 68 and 74 with their simulation parameters.
    Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.11) and (3.12); relies on same-group or unpublished simulation results.
  • domain assumption The dark and visible sectors are entropically decoupled before the dark phase transition.
    Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.17); required for the Delta Neff estimates.
  • standard math Standard Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology with entropy conservation applies.
    Used implicitly in relic density and gravitational wave redshift formulas.
invented entities (1)
  • Hidden 't Hooft-Polyakov monopoles of dark SU(2)d
    purpose: Dark matter candidate and source of the Witten-effect axion mass.
    The paper provides no direct falsifiable handle on these monopoles outside the model; their abundance and signals are model-dependent consequences.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational waves and dark matter with Witten effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X47OJTM6

@misc{pith2026250109596,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational waves and dark matter with Witten effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X47OJTM6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09596}
}
abstract

We investigate the breaking of dark $SU(2)_d$ symmetry at different temperature scales, occurring after Peccei-Quinn symmetry breaking or following QCD symmetry breaking. We focus on assessing the potential of the hidden monopoles generated during this process to serve as dark matter candidate. Additionally, we examine the impact of axion-monopole interactions on the axion mass. When the phase transition occurs at extremely high temperature ($\sim 10^8 \mathrm{GeV}$), the contribution of monopoles to the axion mass through witten effect becomes non-negligible, playing a crucial role in accurately determining the axion relic density. Moreover, the stochastic gravitational wave background generated by dark phase transition and axionic domain wall collapse may offer a potential explanation for the low-frequency gravitational wave signals observed in PTA experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. One-Dimensional Simulations of the Topological Defects in a 3:1 $U(1)$ Model

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a 3:1 U(1) model, the Z3 domain wall develops a growing bias angle beta as v1/v2 is lowered, and no static wall exists below R12 ≈ 0.768.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [103]

    Kawasaki, F

    M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi and M. Yamada, Adiabatic suppression of the axion abundance and isocurvature due to coupling to hidden monopoles , JHEP 01 (2018) 053 [ 1708.06047]

    arXiv 2018

  2. [1]

    Fischler and J

    W. Fischler and J. Preskill, DYON - AXION DYNAMICS , Phys. Lett. B 125 (1983) 165

    1983

  3. [2]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Ibe, M. Suzuki and S. Yamaguchi, Gauge kinetic mixing and dark topological defects, JHEP 12 (2021) 122 [ 2109.12771]. – 15 –

    arXiv 2021

  4. [3]

    Huber and T

    S.J. Huber and T. Konstandin, Gravitational Wave Production by Collisions: More Bubbles, JCAP 09 (2008) 022 [ 0806.1828]

    arXiv 2008

  5. [4]

    Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA

    C. Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions , JCAP 04 (2016) 001 [ 1512.06239]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [5]

    Steinhardt, Relativistic Detonation Waves and Bubble Growth in False Vacuum Decay , Phys

    P.J. Steinhardt, Relativistic Detonation Waves and Bubble Growth in False Vacuum Decay , Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 2074

    1982

  7. [6]

    Kamionkowski, A

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and M.S. Turner, Gravitational radiation from first order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 2837 [ astro-ph/9310044]

    arXiv 1994

  8. [7]

    Grilli di Cortona, E

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega and G. Villadoro, The QCD axion, precisely , JHEP 01 (2016) 034 [ 1511.02867]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 149 references
  1. [8]

    Co and K

    R.T. Co and K. Harigaya, Axiogenesis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 111602 [ 1910.02080]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [9]

    R.T. Co, T. Gherghetta and K. Harigaya, Axiogenesis with a heavy QCD axion , JHEP 10 (2022) 121 [ 2206.00678]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Hook, TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions , PoS T ASI2018(2019) 004 [1812.02669]

    A. Hook, TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions , PoS T ASI2018(2019) 004 [1812.02669]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Pierre Augercollaboration, Search for ultrarelativistic magnetic monopoles with the Pierre Auger Observatory , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 082002 [ 1609.04451]

    2016 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Mavromatos and V.A

    N.E. Mavromatos and V.A. Mitsou, Magnetic monopoles revisited: Models and searches at colliders and in the Cosmos , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (2020) 2030012 [ 2005.05100]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [13]

    IceCube collaboration, Searches for Relativistic Magnetic Monopoles in IceCube , Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 133 [ 1511.01350]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Hindmarsh, S.J

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir, Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition , Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 123009 [ 1504.03291]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Hindmarsh, S.J

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir, Gravitational waves from the sound of a first order phase transition , Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 041301 [ 1304.2433]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Lewicki, J.M. No and V. Vaskonen, Gravitational wave energy budget in strongly supercooled phase transitions, JCAP 06 (2019) 024 [ 1903.09642]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Durrer and G. Servant, The stochastic gravitational wave background from turbulence and magnetic fields generated by a first-order phase transition , JCAP 12 (2009) 024 [0909.0622]

    2009 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Hindmarsh, M

    M.B. Hindmarsh, M. L¨ uben, J. Lumma and M. Pauly, Phase transitions in the early universe, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 24 (2021) 1 [ 2008.09136]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Nakagawa, F

    S. Nakagawa, F. Takahashi and M. Yamada, Cosmic Birefringence Triggered by Dark Matter Domination , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 181103 [ 2103.08153]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Graesser, I.M

    M.L. Graesser, I.M. Shoemaker and N.T. Arellano, Milli-magnetic monopole dark matter and the survival of galactic magnetic fields , JHEP 03 (2022) 105 [ 2105.05769]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Nomura, S

    Y. Nomura, S. Rajendran and F. Sanches, Axion Isocurvature and Magnetic Monopoles , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 141803 [ 1511.06347]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Caldwell et al., Detection of early-universe gravitational-wave signatures and fundamental physics , Gen

    R. Caldwell et al., Detection of early-universe gravitational-wave signatures and fundamental physics , Gen. Rel. Grav. 54 (2022) 156 [ 2203.07972]. – 16 –

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta and S.K. Kang, A first order dark SU(2) D phase transition with vector dark matter in the light of NANOGrav 12.5 yr data , JCAP 12 (2021) 039 [2109.11558]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Khoze and G

    V.V. Khoze and G. Ro, Dark matter monopoles, vectors and photons , JHEP 10 (2014) 061 [1406.2291]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Y. Bai, M. Korwar and N. Orlofsky, Electroweak-Symmetric Dark Monopoles from Preheating, JHEP 07 (2020) 167 [ 2005.00503]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [26]

    S. Baek, P. Ko and W.-I. Park, Hidden sector monopole, vector dark matter and dark radiation with Higgs portal , JCAP 10 (2014) 067 [ 1311.1035]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Terning and C.B

    J. Terning and C.B. Verhaaren, Detecting Dark Matter with Aharonov-Bohm , JHEP 12 (2019) 152 [ 1906.00014]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Evslin and S.B

    J. Evslin and S.B. Gudnason, Dwarf Galaxy Sized Monopoles as Dark Matter? , 1202.0560

    arXiv

  22. [29]

    Murayama and J

    H. Murayama and J. Shu, Topological Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 686 (2010) 162 [0905.1720]

    2010 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Kawasaki, F

    M. Kawasaki, F. Takahashi and M. Yamada, Suppressing the QCD Axion Abundance by Hidden Monopoles, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 677 [ 1511.05030]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Gomez Sanchez and B

    C. Gomez Sanchez and B. Holdom, Monopoles, strings and dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 123524 [ 1103.1632]

    2011 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Delle Rose, G

    L. Delle Rose, G. Panico, M. Redi and A. Tesi, Gravitational Waves from Supercool Axions , JHEP 04 (2020) 025 [ 1912.06139]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

    M. Punturo et al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 194002

    2010

  27. [34]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [35]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Search for the isotropic stochastic background using data from Advanced LIGO’s second observing run , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 061101 [1903.02886]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Machado, W

    C.S. Machado, W. Ratzinger, P. Schwaller and B.A. Stefanek, Gravitational wave probes of axionlike particles, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 075033 [ 1912.01007]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Dev and A

    P.S.B. Dev and A. Mazumdar, Probing the Scale of New Physics by Advanced LIGO/VIRGO, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 104001 [ 1602.04203]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Von Harling, A

    B. Von Harling, A. Pomarol, O. Pujol` as and F. Rompineve, Peccei-Quinn Phase Transition at LIGO , JHEP 04 (2020) 195 [ 1912.07587]

    2020 arXiv

  32. [39]

    R. Sato, F. Takahashi and M. Yamada, Unified Origin of Axion and Monopole Dark Matter, and Solution to the Domain-wall Problem , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 043535 [ 1805.10533]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Daido, S.-Y

    R. Daido, S.-Y. Ho and F. Takahashi, Hidden monopole dark matter via axion portal and its implications for direct detection searches, beam-dump experiments, and the H 0 tension, JHEP 01 (2020) 185 [ 1909.03627]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Baldes and C

    I. Baldes and C. Garcia-Cely, Strong gravitational radiation from a simple dark matter model, JHEP 05 (2019) 190 [ 1809.01198]. – 17 –

    2019 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Search for gravitational wave signals , Astron

    EPTA, InPTA:collaboration, The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals , Astron. Astrophys. 678 (2023) A50 [2306.16214]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Reardon et al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array , Astrophys

    D.J. Reardon et al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array , Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L6 [ 2306.16215]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Y. Bai, S. Lu and N. Orlofsky, Searching for Magnetic Monopoles with the Earth’s Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 101801 [ 2103.06286]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Zhang, S.-H

    C. Zhang, S.-H. Zhang, B. Fu, J.-F. Zhang and X. Zhang, On the cosmological abundance of magnetic monopoles, JHEP 08 (2024) 220 [ 2404.04926]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Addazi, Y.-F

    A. Addazi, Y.-F. Cai, A. Marciano and L. Visinelli, Have pulsar timing array methods detected a cosmological phase transition? , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 015028 [ 2306.17205]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Athron, A

    P. Athron, A. Fowlie, C.-T. Lu, L. Morris, L. Wu, Y. Wu et al., Can Supercooled Phase Transitions Explain the Gravitational Wave Background Observed by Pulsar Timing Arrays?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 221001 [ 2306.17239]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Wu, Z.-C

    Y.-M. Wu, Z.-C. Chen and Q.-G. Huang, Cosmological interpretation for the stochastic signal in pulsar timing arrays , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67 (2024) 240412 [2307.03141]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [49]

    S. He, L. Li, S. Wang and S.-J. Wang, Constraints on holographic QCD phase transitions from PTA observations, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68 (2025) 210411 [ 2308.07257]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Chen, S.-L

    Z.-C. Chen, S.-L. Li, P. Wu and H. Yu, NANOGrav hints for first-order confinement-deconfinement phase transition in different QCD-matter scenarios , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 043022 [ 2312.01824]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Xue et al., Constraining Cosmological Phase Transitions with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Phys

    X. Xue et al., Constraining Cosmological Phase Transitions with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 251303 [ 2110.03096]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Ratzinger and P

    W. Ratzinger and P. Schwaller, Whispers from the dark side: Confronting light new physics with NANOGrav data , SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 047 [ 2009.11875]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Addazi, Y.-F

    A. Addazi, Y.-F. Cai, Q. Gan, A. Marciano and K. Zeng, NANOGrav results and dark first order phase transitions , Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64 (2021) 290411 [ 2009.10327]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Nakai, M

    Y. Nakai, M. Suzuki, F. Takahashi and M. Yamada, Gravitational Waves and Dark Radiation from Dark Phase Transition: Connecting NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Data and Hubble Tension, Phys. Lett. B 816 (2021) 136238 [ 2009.09754]

    2021 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Bian, R.-G

    L. Bian, R.-G. Cai, J. Liu, X.-Y. Yang and R. Zhou, Evidence for different gravitational-wave sources in the NANOGrav dataset , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) L081301 [2009.13893]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , Res

    H. Xu et al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I , Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23 (2023) 075024 [2306.16216]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [57]

    NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 (2023) L8 [ 2306.16213]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Chen and T

    C.-H. Chen and T. Nomura, Searching for vector dark matter via Higgs portal at the LHC , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 074019 [ 1507.00886]. – 18 –

    2016 arXiv

  52. [59]

    E. Hall, T. Konstandin, R. McGehee, H. Murayama and G. Servant, Baryogenesis From a Dark First-Order Phase Transition , JHEP 04 (2020) 042 [ 1910.08068]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Chiang, T

    C.-W. Chiang, T. Nomura and J. Tandean, Nonabelian Dark Matter with Resonant Annihilation, JHEP 01 (2014) 183 [ 1306.0882]

    2014 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Graesser and J.K

    M.L. Graesser and J.K. Osi´ nski,Hidden Sector Monopole Dark Matter with Matter Domination, JHEP 11 (2020) 133 [ 2007.07917]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Chen and T

    C.-H. Chen and T. Nomura, SU (2)X vector DM and Galactic Center gamma-ray excess , Phys. Lett. B 746 (2015) 351 [ 1501.07413]

    2015 arXiv

  56. [63]

    P. Ko, T. Nomura and H. Okada, Dark matter physics in dark SU (2) gauge symmetry with non-Abelian kinetic mixing , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 095011 [ 2007.08153]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [64]

    J. Fan, K. Fraser, M. Reece and J. Stout, Axion Mass from Magnetic Monopole Loops , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 131602 [ 2105.09950]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [65]

    ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories , Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theories , Nucl. Phys. B 79 (1974) 276

    1974

  59. [66]

    Polyakov, Particle Spectrum in Quantum Field Theory , JETP Lett

    A.M. Polyakov, Particle Spectrum in Quantum Field Theory , JETP Lett. 20 (1974) 194

    1974

  60. [67]

    Sesana et al., Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ-Hz frequencies, Exper

    A. Sesana et al., Unveiling the gravitational universe at µ-Hz frequencies, Exper. Astron. 51 (2021) 1333 [ 1908.11391]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Jia and L

    Y. Jia and L. Bian, Gravitational wave and dark matter from Axion-Higgs string , 2412.04218

    arXiv

  62. [69]

    Ruan, Z.-K

    W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai and Y.-Z. Zhang, Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (2020) 2050075 [ 1807.09495]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [70]

    TianQin collaboration, TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector , Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 035010 [ 1512.02076]

    2016 arXiv

  64. [71]

    Hu and Y.-L

    W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity , Natl. Sci. Rev. 4 (2017) 685

    2017

  65. [72]

    Baker et al., The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky , 1907.06482

    J. Baker et al., The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky , 1907.06482

    1907 arXiv

  66. [73]

    LISA collaboration, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, 1702.00786

    arXiv

  67. [74]

    Y. Li, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai and J. Shu, Cosmic Simulations of Axion String-Wall Networks: Probing Dark Matter and Gravitational Waves for Discovery , 2311.02011

    arXiv

  68. [75]

    Bernal, L

    J.L. Bernal, L. Verde and A.G. Riess, The trouble with H0, JCAP 10 (2016) 019 [1607.05617]

    2016 arXiv

  69. [76]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, T. Sekiguchi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama, Improved estimation of radiated axions from cosmological axionic strings , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 123531 [1012.5502]

    2011 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa and T. Sekiguchi, Axion dark matter from topological defects , Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 065014 [ 1412.0789]

    2015 arXiv

  71. [78]

    Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance , Phys

    J.E. Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance , Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 103

    1979

  72. [79]

    Goldman, E.W

    J.T. Goldman, E.W. Kolb and D. Toussaint, Gravitational Clumping and the Annihilation of Monopoles, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 867. – 19 –

    1981

  73. [80]

    Gross, O

    C. Gross, O. Lebedev and Y. Mambrini, Non-Abelian gauge fields as dark matter , JHEP 08 (2015) 158 [ 1505.07480]

    2015 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Boehm, M.J

    C. Boehm, M.J. Dolan and C. McCabe, A weighty interpretation of the Galactic Centre excess, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 023531 [ 1404.4977]

    2014 arXiv

  75. [82]

    Hambye, Hidden vector dark matter , JHEP 01 (2009) 028 [ 0811.0172]

    T. Hambye, Hidden vector dark matter , JHEP 01 (2009) 028 [ 0811.0172]

    2009 arXiv

  76. [83]

    Vilenkin, Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls and Strings , Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls and Strings , Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 852

    1981

  77. [84]

    Larsson, S

    S.E. Larsson, S. Sarkar and P.L. White, Evading the cosmological domain wall problem , Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5129 [ hep-ph/9608319]

    1997 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Gelmini, M

    G.B. Gelmini, M. Gleiser and E.W. Kolb, Cosmology of Biased Discrete Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 1558

    1989

  79. [86]

    Guada, M

    V. Guada, M. Nemevˇ sek and M. Pintar, FindBounce: Package for multi-field bounce actions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256 (2020) 107480 [ 2002.00881]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Preskill, Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles , Phys

    J. Preskill, Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles , Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1365

    1979

  81. [88]

    Einhorn and K

    M.B. Einhorn and K. Sato, Monopole Production in the Very Early Universe in a First Order Phase Transition, Nucl. Phys. B 180 (1981) 385

    1981

  82. [89]

    Riess, S

    A.G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L. Macri, J. Anderson, J.W. MacKenty et al., New parallaxes of galactic cepheids from spatially scanning the hubble space telescope: Implications for the hubble constant , The Astrophysical Journal 855 (2018) 136

    2018

  83. [90]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions? , Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493

    1980

  84. [91]

    Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions

    A.R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian) , Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980) 260

    1980

  85. [92]

    Yamaguchi, M

    M. Yamaguchi, M. Kawasaki and J. Yokoyama, Evolution of axionic strings and spectrum of axions radiated from them , Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 4578 [ hep-ph/9811311]

    1999 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Lyth, Estimates of the cosmological axion density , Phys

    D.H. Lyth, Estimates of the cosmological axion density , Phys. Lett. B 275 (1992) 279

    1992

  87. [94]

    Vanvlasselaer, DW-genesis: generating the baryon number from domain walls , 12, 2024 [2501.00491]

    M. Vanvlasselaer, DW-genesis: generating the baryon number from domain walls , 12, 2024 [2501.00491]

    2024 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Mariotti, X

    A. Mariotti, X. Nagels, A. Rase and M. Vanvlasselaer, DW-genesis: baryon number from domain wall network collapse , 2411.13494

    arXiv

  89. [96]

    Blinov and G

    N. Blinov and G. Marques-Tavares, Interacting radiation after Planck and its implications for the Hubble Tension , JCAP 09 (2020) 029 [ 2003.08387]

    2020 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Julia and A

    B. Julia and A. Zee, Poles with Both Magnetic and Electric Charges in Nonabelian Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2227

    1975

  91. [98]

    Banerjee and M.A

    A. Banerjee and M.A. Buen-Abad, Dynamical Axion Misalignment from the Witten Effect , 2410.21369

    arXiv

  92. [99]

    Jeong, S

    K.S. Jeong, S. Nakagawa, F. Takahashi and M. Yamada, Dissipation of axion energy via the Schwinger and Witten effects , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 015014 [ 2309.16570]

    2024 arXiv

  93. [100]

    Zeldovich and M.Y

    Y.B. Zeldovich and M.Y. Khlopov, On the Concentration of Relic Magnetic Monopoles in the Universe , Phys. Lett. B 79 (1978) 239. – 20 –

    1978

  94. [101]

    Vilenkin and E.P.S

    A. Vilenkin and E.P.S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects , Cambridge University Press (7, 2000)

    2000

  95. [102]

    Crowder and N.J

    J. Crowder and N.J. Cornish, Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 083005 [ gr-qc/0506015]

    2005 arXiv

  96. [104]

    N. Seto, S. Kawamura and T. Nakamura, Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space , Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 221103 [ astro-ph/0108011]

    2001 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Witten, Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi , Phys

    E. Witten, Dyons of Charge e theta/2 pi , Phys. Lett. B 86 (1979) 283

    1979

  98. [106]

    Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [ 2006.13545]

    S. Kawamura et al., Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO, PTEP 2021 (2021) 05A105 [ 2006.13545]

    2021 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Kudoh, A

    H. Kudoh, A. Taruya, T. Hiramatsu and Y. Himemoto, Detecting a gravitational-wave background with next-generation space interferometers , Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 064006 [gr-qc/0511145]

    2006 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Fornal, Y

    B. Fornal, Y. Shirman, T.M.P. Tait and J.R. West, Asymmetric dark matter and baryogenesis from SU (2)ℓ, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 035001 [ 1703.00199]

    2017 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Bian, H.-K

    L. Bian, H.-K. Guo, Y. Wu and R. Zhou, Gravitational wave and collider searches for electroweak symmetry breaking patterns, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035011 [ 1906.11664]

    2020 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Ghosh, H.-K

    T. Ghosh, H.-K. Guo, T. Han and H. Liu, Electroweak phase transition with an SU(2) dark sector, JHEP 07 (2021) 045 [ 2012.09758]

    2021 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Fixsen, The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background , Astrophys

    D.J. Fixsen, The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background , Astrophys. J. 707 (2009) 916 [ 0911.1955]

    2009 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Binetruy, A

    P. Binetruy, A. Bohe, C. Caprini and J.-F. Dufaux, Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves and eLISA/NGO: Phase Transitions, Cosmic Strings and Other Sources, JCAP 06 (2012) 027 [ 1201.0983]

    2012 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and T. Moroi, Big-Bang nucleosynthesis and hadronic decay of long-lived massive particles , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 083502 [ astro-ph/0408426]

    2005 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and T. Moroi, Hadronic decay of late - decaying particles and Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis, Phys. Lett. B 625 (2005) 7 [ astro-ph/0402490]

    2005 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Y. Di, J. Wang, R. Zhou, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai and J. Liu, Magnetic Field and Gravitational Waves from the First-Order Phase Transition , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 251102 [2012.15625]

    2021 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Lewicki and J.M. No, Gravitational waves from first-order cosmological phase transitions: lifetime of the sound wave source , JCAP 07 (2020) 050 [ 2003.07360]

    2020 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Espinosa, T

    J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J.M. No and G. Servant, Energy Budget of Cosmological First-order Phase Transitions, JCAP 06 (2010) 028 [ 1004.4187]

    2010 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Cutting, M

    D. Cutting, M. Hindmarsh and D.J. Weir, Gravitational waves from vacuum first-order phase transitions: from the envelope to the lattice , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 123513 [1802.05712]. – 21 –

    2018 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Cutting, E.G

    D. Cutting, E.G. Escartin, M. Hindmarsh and D.J. Weir, Gravitational waves from vacuum first order phase transitions II: from thin to thick walls , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 023531 [2005.13537]

    2021 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update , JCAP 03 (2020) 024 [ 1910.13125]

    C. Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update , JCAP 03 (2020) 024 [ 1910.13125]

    2020 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Hindmarsh, S.J

    M. Hindmarsh, S.J. Huber, K. Rummukainen and D.J. Weir, Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 103520 [ 1704.05871]

    2017 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Enqvist, J

    K. Enqvist, J. Ignatius, K. Kajantie and K. Rummukainen, Nucleation and bubble growth in a first order cosmological electroweak phase transition , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 3415

    1992

  115. [123]

    Wang, F.P

    X. Wang, F.P. Huang and X. Zhang, Phase transition dynamics and gravitational wave spectra of strong first-order phase transition in supercooled universe , JCAP 05 (2020) 045 [2003.08892]

    2020 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Guth and E.J

    A.H. Guth and E.J. Weinberg, Cosmological Consequences of a First Order Phase Transition in the SU(5) Grand Unified Model , Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 876

    1981

  117. [125]

    Moreno, M

    J.M. Moreno, M. Quiros and M. Seco, Bubbles in the supersymmetric standard model , Nucl. Phys. B 526 (1998) 489 [ hep-ph/9801272]

    1998 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Guth and S.H.H

    A.H. Guth and S.H.H. Tye, Phase Transitions and Magnetic Monopole Production in the Very Early Universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 631

    1980

  119. [127]

    Leitao, A

    L. Leitao, A. Megevand and A.D. Sanchez, Gravitational waves from the electroweak phase transition, JCAP 10 (2012) 024 [ 1205.3070]

    2012 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Kadota, M

    K. Kadota, M. Kawasaki and K. Saikawa, Gravitational waves from domain walls in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model , JCAP 10 (2015) 041 [ 1503.06998]

    2015 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki and K. Saikawa, On the estimation of gravitational wave spectrum from cosmic domain walls , JCAP 02 (2014) 031 [ 1309.5001]

    2014 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Arnold and O

    P.B. Arnold and O. Espinosa, The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 3546 [ hep-ph/9212235]

    1993 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Carrington, The Effective potential at finite temperature in the Standard Model , Phys

    M.E. Carrington, The Effective potential at finite temperature in the Standard Model , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2933

    1992

  124. [132]

    Hlozek, D

    R. Hlozek, D. Grin, D.J.E. Marsh and P.G. Ferreira, A search for ultralight axions using precision cosmological data, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 103512 [ 1410.2896]

    2015 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Anderson and L.J

    G.W. Anderson and L.J. Hall, The Electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis , Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2685

    1992

  126. [134]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature , Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 3320

    1974

  127. [135]

    Coleman and E.J

    S.R. Coleman and E.J. Weinberg, Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 1888

    1973

  128. [136]

    Quiros, Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions , in ICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology , pp

    M. Quiros, Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions , in ICTP Summer School in High-Energy Physics and Cosmology , pp. 187–259, 1, 1999 [ hep-ph/9901312]

    1999 arXiv

  129. [137]

    NANOGrav collaboration, The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett. 905 (2020) L34 [2009.04496]. – 22 –

    2020 arXiv

  130. [138]

    EPTA collaboration, Common-red-signal analysis with 24-yr high-precision timing of the European Pulsar Timing Array: inferences in the stochastic gravitational-wave background search, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 508 (2021) 4970 [ 2110.13184]

    2021 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Goncharov et al., On the Evidence for a Common-spectrum Process in the Search for the Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array , Astrophys

    B. Goncharov et al., On the Evidence for a Common-spectrum Process in the Search for the Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array , Astrophys. J. Lett. 917 (2021) L19 [ 2107.12112]

    2021 arXiv

  132. [140]

    ’t Hooft, Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle, Phys

    G. ’t Hooft, Computation of the Quantum Effects Due to a Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 3432

    1976

  133. [141]

    Vilenkin and A.E

    A. Vilenkin and A.E. Everett, Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls in Models with Goldstone and PseudoGoldstone Bosons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1867

    1982

  134. [142]

    Sikivie, Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Universe , Phys

    P. Sikivie, Of Axions, Domain Walls and the Early Universe , Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1156

    1982

  135. [143]

    Zeldovich, I.Y

    Y.B. Zeldovich, I.Y. Kobzarev and L.B. Okun, Cosmological Consequences of the Spontaneous Breakdown of Discrete Symmetry , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 67 (1974) 3

    1974

  136. [144]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion , Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127

    1983

  137. [145]

    Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279

    1978

  138. [146]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223

    1978

  139. [147]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791

    1977

  140. [148]

    Peccei and H.R

    R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440

    1977

  141. [149]

    Vafa and E

    C. Vafa and E. Witten, Parity Conservation in QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 535. – 23 –

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.