REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey on LLM Test-Time Compute via Search: Tasks, LLM Profiling, Search Algorithms, and Relevant Frameworks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
LLM test-time compute (or LLM inference) via search has emerged as a promising research area with rapid developments. However, current frameworks often adopt distinct perspectives on three key aspects: task definition, LLM profiling, and search procedures, making direct comparisons challenging. Moreover, the search algorithms employed often diverge from standard implementations, and their specific characteristics are not thoroughly specified. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive but integrated technical review on existing LIS frameworks. Specifically, we unify task definitions under Markov Decision Process (MDP) and provides modular definitions of LLM profiling and search procedures. The definitions enable precise comparisons of various LLM inference frameworks while highlighting their departures from conventional search algorithms. We also discuss the applicability, performance, and efficiency of these methods. For ongoing paper updates, please refer to our GitHub repository: https://github.com/xinzhel/LLM-Search.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Deciphering Trajectory-Aided LLM Reasoning: An Optimization Perspective
Reasoning trajectories are formalized as pseudo-gradient descent on LLM parameters, making LLM reasoning training a MAML-style meta-learning problem.
-
AutoChemSchematic AI: Agentic Physics-Aware Automation for Chemical Manufacturing Scale-Up
The framework trains small models on synthetic AI-generated data to produce PFD/PID text, then validates two examples by manual DWSIM setup, leaving the industrial-viability claim unproven.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.