Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Asymptotic safety meets tensor field theory: towards a new class of gravity-matter systems

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that coupling an O(N)^3 tensor scalar field to asymptotically safe quantum gravity creates an interacting fixed point at nonzero quartic coupling, a candidate UV completion in four dimensions.

desk verdict An honest conjecture, not an established result: the interacting fixed point for the quartic coupling in this gravity-tensor model is real only if the large-N gravitational sector behaves as assumed, which has not been shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.10307 v1 pith:3GVWO44A submitted 2025-01-17 hep-th gr-qc

Astrid Eichhorn , Razvan Gurau , Zois Gyftopoulos This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords asymptoticsafetytensorfieldtheoryO(N)^3symmetryfunctionalrenormalizationgrouplarge-Nlimitfreedomquarticscalarcouplingquantumgravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that adding asymptotically safe quantum gravity to an O(N)^3 tensor scalar field theory yields, for the first time in four dimensions, a gravity-scalar theory with an interacting ultraviolet fixed point at a nonzero scalar quartic coupling. If true, the matter sector would no longer need asymptotic freedom to be ultraviolet complete: the competition between antiscreening matter self-interactions and screening gravitational fluctuations pins the quartic couplings to finite fixed-point values. The result matters because it opens a new class of gravity-matter building blocks for asymptotically safe model building, and the selected fixed point has one relevant direction, so it could be predictive.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the gravitational screening coefficient $f_\lambda(G,\Lambda)$, introduced through $\beta_\lambda = -f_\lambda \lambda + \dots$ and computed by projecting the Wetterich equation onto the quartic scalar interaction. At one loop it evaluates to an expression that is negative for positive Newton coupling and small cosmological constant, but flips sign for $\Lambda_*$ below $\Lambda_{\rm crit}\approx -7/8$, a flip the authors tentatively attribute to gauge choice. The second piece is the large-N $\beta$-function system, Eq. (31), which posits that every quartic coupling receives the same linear gravitational term and that the matter contributions are the known antiscreening terms of the O(N)^3 model. Their interplay produces the nonzero fixed point, with the gravitational term alone determining the fixed-point value of the tetrahedral coupling.

What would settle it

Compute $f_\lambda(G,\Lambda)$ in a gauge-invariant or fluctuation-field renormalization group setup at fixed points with $\Lambda_*$ below $\Lambda_{\rm crit}\approx -7/8$; if $f_\lambda$ is found positive or vanishing there, the interacting fixed point in Eq. (32) is not real and the paper's central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the pure O(N)^3 tensor field theory with imaginary tetrahedral coupling, the quartic couplings are asymptotically free at large N because the matter self-interactions are antiscreening. The paper adds a gravitational contribution $-f_\lambda \lambda_i$ to each quartic $\beta$ function, with $f_\lambda<0$ for screening gravity, computed at one loop from the functional renormalization group. The linear gravitational term breaks the degeneracy of the Gaussian fixed point and, competing with the antiscreening matter term, produces interacting fixed points with $g_*/(4\pi)^2 = \pm \sqrt{-f_\lambda/2}$ and $g_{1,*}$, $g_{2,*}$ given in Eq. (32). For $f_\lambda<0$ these fixed points are real; requiring the scalar potential to be bounded from below selects the fixed point with positive $g_1$ and $g_2$, which has exactly one relevant direction. The paper therefore claims to exhibit the first four-dimensional gravity-scalar theory that may realize asymptotic safety at a non-vanishing quartic coupling.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that in the large-N limit the gravitational coefficient $f_\lambda$ stays nonzero, negative, and is the only gravitational correction to the quartic $\beta$ functions, so that the flow is described by Eq. (31).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the fixed point with positive $g_1$ and $g_2$ exists, the tensor scalar sector is ultraviolet complete with one relevant direction, so its infrared behavior is controlled by a single free parameter, aside from the mass direction.
  • Trajectories near the fixed point flow either to the Gaussian fixed point or into a strong-coupling regime in the infrared, giving universal infrared predictions along the stable separatrix.
  • The mechanism turns previously asymptotically free trajectories into asymptotically safe ones, providing an explicit example in which a scalar quartic coupling does not have to vanish at an asymptotically safe fixed point with gravity.
  • The model offers a new candidate building block for hidden or dark scalar sectors coupled to asymptotically safe quantum gravity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the same competition could work for any matter theory whose self-interactions are antiscreening: a marginal coupling with a negative cubic beta-function term will acquire a nonzero fixed point when gravity is screening, as long as $f_\lambda$ stays negative and higher-order gravitational corrections remain subleading.
  • If the sign flip of $f_\lambda$ for $\Lambda_* < \Lambda_{\rm crit}\approx -7/8$ is not a gauge artifact, the interacting fixed point would disappear for those gravitational backgrounds, so a gauge-invariant calculation of $f_\lambda$ would decide whether the central result is robust.
  • A natural extension is to relax the large-N limit: at finite N the gravitational fixed point is better controlled, and one could check whether the interacting fixed point persists and how $1/N$ corrections shift the critical exponents.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper combines asymptotically safe quantum gravity with a large-N O(N)^3 tensor field theory in four dimensions, in which the tetrahedral coupling is taken imaginary so that the pure-matter theory is asymptotically free. The authors compute the gravitational screening coefficient fλ in a one-loop FRG truncation, obtain fλ < 0 at leading order, and then posit large-N beta functions in which the same fλ multiplies all three quartic couplings (Eq. (31)). Solving those beta functions, they find interacting fixed points with g_*/(4π)^2 = ± sqrt(−fλ/2) and one relevant direction (Eqs. (32)–(33)). They conclude that this is the first example of a gravity-scalar theory in four dimensions that may realize asymptotic safety at a non-vanishing scalar quartic coupling.

Significance. If established, the result would be a qualitatively new gravity-matter universality class: a theory whose matter sector is not asymptotically free in flat space but becomes asymptotically safe at nonzero quartic coupling once gravity is included. The explicit fixed-point algebra in Eqs. (31)–(33) is internally consistent, and the leading-order sign fλ < 0 is a useful cross-check against earlier scalar-gravity results. The paper is also transparent about its main assumptions, stating in Sec. III.A that the large-N survival of fλ is assumed and in the Conclusions that the large-N gravitational fixed point is not yet controlled. The strength of the paper is its clear conceptual framing and simple, explicit beta functions; its central claim, however, is a conjecture contingent on unverified assumptions about the large-N gravitational sector.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.A–B, Eq. (31)] The large-N beta functions with gravity are posited rather than derived. The text states: "We make the assumption that in the large-N limit fλ survives and that additional gravitational contributions to the matter beta functions can in a first approximation be neglected" (Sec. III.A). Because the fixed point in Eq. (32), its realness, and its critical exponents in Eq. (33) are all explicit functions of fλ, this assumption is load-bearing. The paper needs a derivation of Eq. (31) from a controlled large-N gravity-matter calculation, or at least a separate computation showing that fλ indeed survives and dominates at leading order in N. As it stands, the abstract's claim to "exhibit" the first example is stronger than what is established; the result is a conditional proposal.
  2. [Sec. II.B, Eq. (18)] The sign of fλ is the key condition for the interacting fixed point, since Eq. (32) requires fλ < 0. The FRG computation, however, shows that fλ changes sign for Λ* below Λcrit ≈ −7/8 (Eq. (18)). The authors dismiss this sign-flip region as a gauge artifact because ηS vanishes for β = α = 0 in d = 4, but no gauge-independent calculation is provided. Without such a calculation, or at least a demonstration that the physical gravitational fixed point lies in the regime Λ* > Λcrit, the sign condition fλ < 0 is not established. This is not a minor caveat: if the actual fixed point lies in the flipped-sign regime, the interacting fixed point in Eq. (32) disappears.
  3. [Sec. III.A and Conclusions] The large-N behavior of the gravitational fixed point itself is not controlled, and this directly undermines the assumed constancy of fλ. Because the matter sector contains N^3 scalar fields, the back-reaction on G* and Λ* can be strong; the paper concedes that "the structure of the gravitational fixed point itself is not yet well-understood in this limit" and that the main gravitational contribution was "conjectured" to remain present. Depending on how G* and Λ* scale with N, fλ(G*, Λ*) could vanish, change sign, or scale with N, any of which would remove or alter the fixed point. The Conclusions should therefore state unambiguously that the advertised UV completion is contingent on an unresolved dynamical question in the gravity sector, not an established property of the model.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (20)] There is a typographical error in the definition of δd_{ab;cd}: the last factor reads δ_{c3kd3}, which should be δ_{c3d3}.
  2. [References] References [112] and [151] appear to be the same book (Gurau, "Random Tensors"); one of them should be removed or the citation should be consolidated.
  3. [Fig. 5] The axes of the two panels in Fig. 5 are not labeled; adding explicit axis labels (e.g., g1/(4π)^2 and g2/(4π)^2) would help the reader connect the figure to Eq. (31).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central fixed point is contingent on an explicit large-N assumption but is not equivalent to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that a tensor field theory coupled to asymptotically safe gravity may develop an interacting fixed point at nonzero quartic coupling. The fixed-point values in Eq. (32) are algebraic solutions of the posited large-N beta functions in Eq. (31). These beta functions combine two ingredients: the pure-matter two-loop beta functions from prior work [4,118,140] and a gravitational contribution -f_lambda*g that is computed independently in Sec. II.B via FRG (Eqs. 13-17). The coefficient f_lambda is not fitted to the target matter fixed point; it is calculated from the gravitational sector, and its sign is determined by the FRG calculation (f_lambda < 0 at leading order in the physical regime). The fixed point is then a genuine consequence of balancing the antiscreening matter term against the screening gravitational term. The main caveat is that the survival and negativity of f_lambda in the large-N limit are assumed rather than derived: Sec. III.A states 'We make the assumption that in the large-N limit f_lambda survives and that additional gravitational contributions to the matter beta functions can in a first approximation be neglected,' and the Conclusions concede 'the structure of the gravitational fixed point itself is not yet well-understood in this limit. We conjectured that the main gravitational contribution ... remains present.' This is a load-bearing conjecture about an external input, but it is not a circular reduction: the assumed beta functions are not defined in terms of the fixed point they produce, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The sign flip of f_lambda for Lambda* below Lambda_crit is flagged by the authors as a likely gauge artifact and deferred to future work, which is a robustness concern rather than circularity. The self-citations to [4,105] concern prior published results that are externally checkable and are not invoked as unverified uniqueness theorems. Overall, the derivation is self-contained in the sense that each claimed prediction follows from stated equations, even though the physical regime of those equations rests on an explicit, unproven large-N assumption.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on five structural inputs: the FRG framework, the asymptotic-safety assumption for gravity, the prior asymptotic-freedom result for the tensor model, the posited survival of fλ at large N, and the dismissal of the fλ sign flip as a gauge artifact. The last two are ad hoc to this paper and are acknowledged by the authors.

free parameters (1)
  • fλ (gravitational coefficient in the matter beta functions) = not fixed; assumed negative, with fλ = -2 used for illustration in Fig. 5
    The existence of the interacting fixed point requires fλ < 0. The paper does not determine fλ in the large-N limit; it assumes the small-N FRG result survives. The fixed-point coordinates in Eq. (32) are functions of fλ.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The Wetterich equation together with the Litim regulator and the chosen truncation provides a reliable estimate of the gravitational contribution to matter beta functions.
    Used in Section II.B to compute fλ; this is the standard FRG framework, though the truncation is an approximation.
  • domain assumption Asymptotically safe quantum gravity has an interacting ultraviolet fixed point with finite G* and Λ*, and the transplanckian regime is near-perturbative.
    Assumed in Section II.A (Eq. (2)) and throughout; supported by prior literature cited in the paper but not proven here.
  • domain assumption The O(N)^3 tensor model with imaginary tetrahedral coupling is stable and asymptotically free at large N.
    Taken from Ref. [4]; the paper builds the pure-matter beta functions in Eq. (30) on this result.
  • ad hoc to paper In the large-N limit, the gravitational coefficient fλ survives and dominates over other gravitational contributions to the matter beta functions.
    Posited in Section III.A: 'We make the assumption that in the large-N limit fλ survives...' and reiterated in the conclusions as a conjecture.
  • ad hoc to paper The sign flip of fλ at large negative Λ is a gauge artifact, so fλ remains negative in the physical regime.
    Section II.B: the authors 'tentatively interpret this behavior as an artefact of our choice of gauge' because ηS vanishes for β=α=0 in d=4; this assumption preserves the screening sign needed for the interacting fixed point.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymptotic safety meets tensor field theory: towards a new class of gravity-matter systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3GVWO44A

@misc{pith2026250110307,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymptotic safety meets tensor field theory: towards a new class of gravity-matter systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3GVWO44A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.10307}
}
abstract

Combining asymptotically safe quantum gravity with a tensor field theory, we exhibit the first example of a theory with gravity and scalar fields in four dimensions which may realize asymptotic safety at a non-vanishing value of the scalar quartic coupling. We first present (further) evidence that in the asymptotic-safety paradigm, quantum fluctuations of gravity generically screen the quartic couplings in (multi-)scalar models. For a tensor field theory in which the scalar field transforms under an internal $O(N)^3$ symmetry, this has the effect of replacing asymptotic freedom, recently discovered at large $N$ on a fixed flat background, by an interacting fixed point in the presence of quantum gravity. The fixed point originates from the competition between the effects of the matter self-interactions which, contrary to the usual scalar models, are antiscreening, and the screening gravitational effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.10307 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Diagrams contributing to the anomalous dimension. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. 4-point diagrams with non-trivial contribution at crit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The 3-colored graphs representing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The 2-loop RG-flow chart of the couplings for imaginary tetrahedral coupling. The arrows point towards the infrared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Flow trajectories of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scaling solutions for gauge invariant flow equations in dilaton quantum gravity

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Scaling solutions of a gauge-invariant functional flow equation support the dilaton quantum gravity fixed point, with Planck mass ~ φ² at large field and a stable negative kinetial in the infrared.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

156 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Frohlich, On the Triviality of Lambda (phi**4) in D- Dimensions Theories and the Approach to the Critical Point in D >= Four-Dimensions, Nucl

    J. Frohlich, On the Triviality of Lambda (phi**4) in D- Dimensions Theories and the Approach to the Critical Point in D >= Four-Dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 200, 281 (1982)

    1982

  2. [2]

    Luscher and P

    M. Luscher and P. Weisz, Scaling Laws and Triviality Bounds in the Lattice phi**4 Theory. 1. One Compo- nent Model in the Symmetric Phase, Nucl. Phys. B290, 25 (1987)

    1987

  3. [3]

    Aizenman and H

    M. Aizenman and H. Duminil-Copin, Marginal triviality of the scaling limits of critical 4d ising and λϕ4 4 models, Annals of Mathematics 194, 163 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    Berges, R

    J. Berges, R. Gurau, and T. Preis, Asymptotic freedom in a strongly interacting scalar quantum field theory in four Euclidean dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 016019 (2023), arXiv:2301.09514 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Narain and R

    G. Narain and R. Percacci, Renormalization Group Flow in Scalar-Tensor Theories. I, Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 075001 (2010), arXiv:0911.0386 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Eichhorn, Y

    A. Eichhorn, Y. Hamada, J. Lumma, and M. Ya- mada, Quantum gravity fluctuations flatten the Planck- scale Higgs potential, Phys. Rev. D 97, 086004 (2018), arXiv:1712.00319 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    Buccio and R

    D. Buccio and R. Percacci, Renormalization group flows between Gaussian fixed points, JHEP 10, 113, arXiv:2207.10596 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    D. F. Litim and F. Sannino, Asymptotic safety guaran- teed, JHEP 12, 178, arXiv:1406.2337 [hep-th]

    arXiv

Show all 156 references
  1. [9]

    D. F. Litim and M. J. Trott, Asymptotic safety of scalar field theories, Phys. Rev. D 98, 125006 (2018), arXiv:1810.01678 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Grosse and R

    H. Grosse and R. Wulkenhaar, The beta function in duality covariant noncommutative phi**4 theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 35, 277 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0402093

    2004 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Sfondrini and T

    A. Sfondrini and T. A. Koslowski, Functional Renormal- ization of Noncommutative Scalar Field Theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26, 4009 (2011), arXiv:1006.5145 [hep- th]

    2011 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Romatschke, Negative Coupling ϕ4 on the Lattice, PoS LA TTICE2023, 367 (2024), arXiv:2310.03815 [hep-lat]

    P. Romatschke, Negative Coupling ϕ4 on the Lattice, PoS LA TTICE2023, 367 (2024), arXiv:2310.03815 [hep-lat]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Weinberg, Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theo- ries of gravitation, Chap

    S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theo- ries of gravitation, Chap. 16 in General Relativity ed. by Hawking, S.W. and Israel, W. (1979)

    1979

  6. [14]

    Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the ef- fective potential, Phys

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the ef- fective potential, Phys. Lett. B 301, 90 (1993), arXiv:1710.05815 [hep-th]

    1993 arXiv

  7. [15]

    T. R. Morris, The Exact renormalization group and approximate solutions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 2411 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9308265

    1994 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Reuter, Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity, Phys

    M. Reuter, Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 57, 971 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9605030

    1998 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Buccio, J

    D. Buccio, J. F. Donoghue, and R. Percacci, Amplitudes and renormalization group techniques: A case study, Phys. Rev. D 109, 045008 (2024), arXiv:2307.00055 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    J. F. Donoghue, A Critique of the Asymptotic Safety Program, Front. in Phys.8, 56 (2020), arXiv:1911.02967 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Bonanno, A

    A. Bonanno, A. Eichhorn, H. Gies, J. M. Pawlowski, R. Percacci, M. Reuter, F. Saueressig, and G. P. Vacca, Critical reflections on asymptotically safe gravity, Front. in Phys. 8, 269 (2020), arXiv:2004.06810 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Knorr, C

    B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, Form Factors in Asymptotic Safety: conceptual ideas and computa- tional toolbox, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 234001 (2019), arXiv:1907.02903 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert, Quantum Gravity: A Fluctuating Point of View, Front. in Phys. 8, 551848 (2021), arXiv:2007.10353 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Knorr, C

    B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, Form Factors in Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity, in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Singapore, 2024) pp. 865–913, arXiv:2210.16072 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Knorr, C

    B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, Form Factors in Quantum Gravity: Contrasting non-local, ghost-free gravity and Asymptotic Safety, Nuovo Cim. C 45, 28 (2022), arXiv:2111.12365 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Knorr, S

    B. Knorr, S. Pirlo, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, Cartographing gravity-mediated scattering amplitudes: scalars and photons, arXiv:2205.01738 [hep-th] (2022), arXiv Preprint

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Pastor-Guti´ errez, J

    A. Pastor-Guti´ errez, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, and G. Ruisi, e+e− → µ+µ− in the Asymptotically Safe Standard Model, arXiv:2412.13800 [hep-ph] (2024), arXiv Preprint

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Alkofer, A

    R. Alkofer, A. Eichhorn, A. Held, C. M. Nieto, R. Per- cacci, and M. Schr¨ ofl, Quark masses and mixings in minimally parameterized UV completions of the Standard Model, Annals Phys. 421, 168282 (2020), arXiv:2003.08401 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Platania and C

    A. Platania and C. Wetterich, Non-perturbative unitar- ity and fictitious ghosts in quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135911 (2020), arXiv:2009.06637 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Falls, N

    K. Falls, N. Ohta, and R. Percacci, Towards the de- termination of the dimension of the critical surface in 11 asymptotically safe gravity, Phys. Lett. B 810, 135773 (2020), arXiv:2004.04126 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    G. P. de Brito, A. Eichhorn, and M. Schiffer, Light charged fermions in quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B815, 136128 (2021), arXiv:2010.00605 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bonanno, T

    A. Bonanno, T. Denz, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Re- ichert, Reconstructing the graviton, SciPost Phys. 12, 001 (2022), arXiv:2102.02217 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Laporte, A

    C. Laporte, A. D. Pereira, F. Saueressig, and J. Wang, Scalar-tensor theories within Asymptotic Safety, JHEP 12, 001, arXiv:2110.09566 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Ferrero and M

    R. Ferrero and M. Reuter, Towards a Geometrization of Renormalization Group Histories in Asymptotic Safety, Universe 7, 125 (2021), arXiv:2103.15709 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Baldazzi, K

    A. Baldazzi, K. Falls, and R. Ferrero, Relational observ- ables in asymptotically safe gravity, Annals Phys. 440, 168822 (2022), arXiv:2112.02118 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Basile and A

    I. Basile and A. Platania, Asymptotic Safety: Swamp- land or Wonderland?, Universe 7, 389 (2021), arXiv:2107.06897 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Ohta and M

    N. Ohta and M. Yamada, Higgs scalar potential cou- pled to gravity in the exponential parametrization in arbitrary gauge, Phys. Rev. D 105, 10.1103/Phys- RevD.105.026013 (2022), arXiv:2110.08594 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    J. Daas, W. Oosters, F. Saueressig, and J. Wang, Asymptotically Safe Gravity-Fermion Systems on Curved Backgrounds, Universe 7, 306 (2021), arXiv:2107.01071 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    S. Sen, C. Wetterich, and M. Yamada, Asymptotic free- dom and safety in quantum gravity, JHEP 03, 130, arXiv:2111.04696 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Knorr and M

    B. Knorr and M. Schiffer, Non-Perturbative Propa- gators in Quantum Gravity, Universe 7, 216 (2021), arXiv:2105.04566 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Fehre, D

    J. Fehre, D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Re- ichert, Lorentzian Quantum Gravity and the Graviton Spectral Function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 081501 (2023), arXiv:2111.13232 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Baldazzi and K

    A. Baldazzi and K. Falls, Essential Quantum Einstein Gravity, Universe 7, 294 (2021), arXiv:2107.00671 [hep- th]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    G. P. de Brito, A. Eichhorn, and R. R. L. d. San- tos, The weak-gravity bound and the need for spin in asymptotically safe matter-gravity models, JHEP 11, 110, arXiv:2107.03839 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Eichhorn, M

    A. Eichhorn, M. Pauly, and S. Ray, Towards a Higgs mass determination in asymptotically safe gravity with a dark portal, JHEP 10, 100, arXiv:2107.07949 [hep- ph]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Eichhorn, J

    A. Eichhorn, J. H. Kwapisz, and M. Schiffer, Weak-gravity bound in asymptotically safe gravity- gauge systems, Phys. Rev. D 105, 106022 (2022), arXiv:2112.09772 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    G. P. de Brito, A. Eichhorn, and R. R. Lino dos Santos, Are there ALPs in the asymptotically safe landscape?, JHEP 06, 013, arXiv:2112.08972 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    S. Sen, C. Wetterich, and M. Yamada, Scaling solutions for asymptotically free quantum gravity, JHEP 02, 054, arXiv:2211.05508 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Knorr, Safe essential scalar-tensor theories, arXiv:2204.08564 [hep-th] (2022), arXiv Preprint

    B. Knorr, Safe essential scalar-tensor theories, arXiv:2204.08564 [hep-th] (2022), arXiv Preprint

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    G. P. de Brito and A. Eichhorn, Nonvanishing gravi- tational contribution to matter beta functions for van- ishing dimensionful regulators, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 161 (2023), arXiv:2201.11402 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Eichhorn, R

    A. Eichhorn, R. R. L. dos Santos, and F. Wagner, Shift- symmetric Horndeski gravity in the asymptotic-safety paradigm, JCAP 02, 052, arXiv:2212.08441 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  41. [49]

    Wetterich, Scaling solution for field-dependent gauge couplings in quantum gravity, Nucl

    C. Wetterich, Scaling solution for field-dependent gauge couplings in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 985, 116017 (2022), arXiv:2205.07029 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Pastor-Guti´ errez, J

    A. Pastor-Guti´ errez, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, The Asymptotically Safe Standard Model: From quan- tum gravity to dynamical chiral symmetry breaking, SciPost Phys. 15, 105 (2023), arXiv:2207.09817 [hep- th]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Eichhorn and A

    A. Eichhorn and A. Held, Dynamically vanishing Dirac neutrino mass from quantum scale symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 846, 138196 (2023), arXiv:2204.09008 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Wetterich, Quantum Gravity and Scale Symme- try in Cosmology, in Handbook of Quantum Grav- ity (Springer Nature Singapore, 2023) pp

    C. Wetterich, Quantum Gravity and Scale Symme- try in Cosmology, in Handbook of Quantum Grav- ity (Springer Nature Singapore, 2023) pp. 1143–1210, arXiv:2211.03596 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Ferrero and M

    R. Ferrero and M. Reuter, The spectral geometry of de Sitter space in asymptotic safety, JHEP 08, 040, arXiv:2203.08003 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Ferrero and M

    R. Ferrero and M. Reuter, On the possibility of a novel (A)dS/CFT relationship emerging in Asymptotic Safety, JHEP 12, 118, arXiv:2205.12030 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  47. [55]

    G. P. de Brito, A. Eichhorn, and S. Ray, Light fermions in color: why the quark mass is not the Planck mass, arXiv:2311.16066 [hep-th] (2023), arXiv Preprint

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    G. P. de Brito, B. Knorr, and M. Schiffer, On the weak- gravity bound for a shift-symmetric scalar field, Phys. Rev. D 108, 026004 (2023), arXiv:2302.10989 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Eichhorn and S

    A. Eichhorn and S. Ray, Suppression of proton decay in quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B 850, 138529 (2024), arXiv:2304.06759 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    G. P. de Brito, A. Eichhorn, M. T. Frandsen, M. Rosenlyst, M. E. Thing, and A. F. Vieira, Ruling out models of vector dark matter in asymptotically safe quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 109, 055022 (2024), arXiv:2312.02086 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Knorr, Momentum-dependent field redefinitions in asymptotic safety, Phys

    B. Knorr, Momentum-dependent field redefinitions in asymptotic safety, Phys. Rev. D 110, 026001 (2024), arXiv:2311.12097 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Saueressig and J

    F. Saueressig and J. Wang, Foliated asymptotically safe gravity in the fluctuation approach, JHEP 09, 064, arXiv:2306.10408 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Baldazzi, K

    A. Baldazzi, K. Falls, Y. Kluth, and B. Knorr, Robust- ness of the derivative expansion in Asymptotic Safety, arXiv:2312.03831 [hep-th] (2023), arXiv Preprint

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Eichhorn, R

    A. Eichhorn, R. R. Lino dos Santos, and J. a. L. Miqueleto, From quantum gravity to gravitational waves through cosmic strings, Phys. Rev. D109, 026013 (2024), arXiv:2306.17718 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Becker, A

    M. Becker, A. Kurov, and F. Saueressig, Remarks on the origin of almost-Gaussian scaling in asymptotically safe quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D110, 126003 (2024), arXiv:2402.01075 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Saueressig and A

    F. Saueressig and A. Silva, Harvesting physical pre- dictions from asymptotically safe quantum field theo- ries, Phys. Rev. D110, 085005 (2024), arXiv:2403.08541 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Wetterich, Dark energy evolution from quantum gravity, arXiv:2407.03465 [gr-qc] (2024), arXiv Preprint

    C. Wetterich, Dark energy evolution from quantum gravity, arXiv:2407.03465 [gr-qc] (2024), arXiv Preprint

    2024 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Korver, F

    G. Korver, F. Saueressig, and J. Wang, Global flows of foliated gravity-matter systems, Phys. Lett. B 855, 12 138789 (2024), arXiv:2402.01260 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Eichhorn, A

    A. Eichhorn, A. O. Pedersen, and M. Schiffer, Applica- tion of positivity bounds in asymptotically safe gravity, arXiv:2405.08862 [hep-th] (2024), arXiv Preprint

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Knorr and A

    B. Knorr and A. Platania, Unearthing the intersections: positivity bounds, weak gravity conjecture, and asymp- totic safety landscapes from photon-graviton flows, arXiv:2405.08860 [hep-th] (2024), arXiv Preprint

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Falls and R

    K. Falls and R. Ferrero, Asymptotic Safety within on-shell perturbation theory, arXiv:2411.00938 [hep-th] (2024), arXiv Preprint

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Brenner, A

    L. Brenner, A. Chikkaballi, A. Eichhorn, and S. Ray, Crossing the desert: Towards predictions for SMEFT coefficients from quantum gravity, arXiv:2407.12086 [hep-ph] (2024), arXiv Preprint

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Ferrero and T

    R. Ferrero and T. Thiemann, Relational Lorentzian Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity: Showcase Model, Universe 10, 410 (2024), arXiv:2404.18224 [hep- th]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Saueressig and J

    F. Saueressig and J. Wang, Foliated Asymptotically Safe Gravity – Lorentzian Signature Fluctuations from the Wick Rotation, arXiv:2501.03752 [hep-th] (2025), arXiv Preprint

    2025 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Souma, Nontrivial ultraviolet fixed point in quantum gravity, Prog

    W. Souma, Nontrivial ultraviolet fixed point in quantum gravity, Prog. Theor. Phys. 102, 181 (1999), arXiv:hep- th/9907027

    1999

  66. [74]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Renormalization group flow of quantum gravity in the Einstein-Hilbert trun- cation, Phys. Rev. D 65, 065016 (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0110054

    2002

  67. [75]

    Lauscher and M

    O. Lauscher and M. Reuter, Ultraviolet fixed point and generalized flow equation of quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 65, 025013 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0108040

    2002 arXiv

  68. [76]

    D. F. Litim, Fixed points of quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 201301 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0312114

    2004 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Codello, R

    A. Codello, R. Percacci, and C. Rahmede, Investigating the Ultraviolet Properties of Gravity with a Wilsonian Renormalization Group Equation, Annals Phys. 324, 414 (2009), arXiv:0805.2909 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Benedetti, P

    D. Benedetti, P. F. Machado, and F. Saueressig, Asymp- totic safety in higher-derivative gravity, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24, 2233 (2009), arXiv:0901.2984 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Manrique, S

    E. Manrique, S. Rechenberger, and F. Saueressig, Asymptotically Safe Lorentzian Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 251302 (2011), arXiv:1102.5012 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Don` a, A

    P. Don` a, A. Eichhorn, and R. Percacci, Matter matters in asymptotically safe quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 89, 084035 (2014), arXiv:1311.2898 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Falls, D

    K. Falls, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos, and C. Rahmede, A bootstrap towards asymptotic safety, arXiv:1301.4191 [hep-th] (2013), arXiv Preprint

    2013 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Eichhorn, An asymptotically safe guide to quan- tum gravity and matter, Front

    A. Eichhorn, An asymptotically safe guide to quan- tum gravity and matter, Front. Astron. Space Sci. 5, 47 (2019), arXiv:1810.07615 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Eichhorn, Status update: Asymptotically safe gravity-matter systems, Nuovo Cim

    A. Eichhorn, Status update: Asymptotically safe gravity-matter systems, Nuovo Cim. C 45, 29 (2022), arXiv:2201.11543 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Eichhorn and M

    A. Eichhorn and M. Schiffer, Asymptotic safety of gravity with matter, in Handbook of Quantum Grav- ity (Springer Nature Singapore, 2022) pp. 915–1001, arXiv:2212.07456 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Eichhorn, The microscopic structure of quantum space-time and matter from a renormalization group perspective, Nature Phys

    A. Eichhorn, The microscopic structure of quantum space-time and matter from a renormalization group perspective, Nature Phys. 19, 1527 (2023)

    2023

  78. [86]

    J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert, Quantum Gravity from dynamical metric fluctuations, in Handbook of Quantum Gravity (Springer Nature Singapore, Singa- pore, 2024) pp. 761–830, arXiv:2309.10785 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Saueressig, The Functional Renormalization Group in Quantum Gravity, in Handbook of Quantum Grav- ity (Springer Nature Singapore, 2023) pp

    F. Saueressig, The Functional Renormalization Group in Quantum Gravity, in Handbook of Quantum Grav- ity (Springer Nature Singapore, 2023) pp. 717–760, arXiv:2302.14152 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Quantum Gravity and the Functional Renormalization Group: The Road towards Asymptotic Safety (Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    2019

  81. [89]

    Reichert, Lecture notes: Functional Renormalisation Group and Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity, PoS 384, 005 (2020)

    M. Reichert, Lecture notes: Functional Renormalisation Group and Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity, PoS 384, 005 (2020)

    2020

  82. [90]

    Eichhorn, Asymptotically safe gravity, in 57th Inter- national School of Subnuclear Physics: In Search for the Unexpected (2020) arXiv:2003.00044 [gr-qc]

    A. Eichhorn, Asymptotically safe gravity, in 57th Inter- national School of Subnuclear Physics: In Search for the Unexpected (2020) arXiv:2003.00044 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Basile, L

    I. Basile, L. Buoninfante, F. Di Filippo, B. Knorr, A. Platania, and A. Tokareva, Lectures in Quantum Gravity (2024) arXiv:2412.08690 [hep-th]

    2024

  84. [92]

    Meibohm, J

    J. Meibohm, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, Asymp- totic safety of gravity-matter systems, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084035 (2016), arXiv:1510.07018 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Biemans, A

    J. Biemans, A. Platania, and F. Saueressig, Renormal- ization group fixed points of foliated gravity-matter sys- tems, JHEP 05, 093, arXiv:1702.06539 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  86. [94]

    Christiansen, D

    N. Christiansen, D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, Asymptotic safety of gravity with matter, Phys. Rev. D 97, 106012 (2018), arXiv:1710.04669 [hep- th]

    2018 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Alkofer and F

    N. Alkofer and F. Saueressig, Asymptotically safe f (R)- gravity coupled to matter I: the polynomial case, Annals Phys. 396, 173 (2018), arXiv:1802.00498 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Wetterich and M

    C. Wetterich and M. Yamada, Variable Planck mass from the gauge invariant flow equation, Phys. Rev. D 100, 066017 (2019), arXiv:1906.01721 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Percacci and G

    R. Percacci and G. P. Vacca, Search of scaling solutions in scalar-tensor gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 188 (2015), arXiv:1501.00888 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Labus, R

    P. Labus, R. Percacci, and G. P. Vacca, Asymptotic safety in O(N ) scalar models coupled to gravity, Phys. Lett. B 753, 274 (2016), arXiv:1505.05393 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Don` a, A

    P. Don` a, A. Eichhorn, P. Labus, and R. Percacci, Asymptotic safety in an interacting system of grav- ity and scalar matter, Phys. Rev. D 93, 044049 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 93, 129904 (2016)], arXiv:1512.01589 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Eichhorn, P

    A. Eichhorn, P. Labus, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Re- ichert, Effective universality in quantum gravity, SciPost Phys. 5, 031 (2018), arXiv:1804.00012 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  93. [101]

    B¨ urger, J

    B. B¨ urger, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, and B.-J. Schaefer, Curvature dependence of quantum gravity with scalars, arXiv:1912.01624 [hep-th] (2019), arXiv Preprint

    2019 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Shaposhnikov and C

    M. Shaposhnikov and C. Wetterich, Asymptotic safety of gravity and the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Lett. B 683, 196 (2010), arXiv:0912.0208 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Eichhorn and A

    A. Eichhorn and A. Held, Top mass from asymptotic safety, Phys. Lett. B 777, 217 (2018), arXiv:1707.01107 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Eichhorn and F

    A. Eichhorn and F. Versteegen, Upper bound on the Abelian gauge coupling from asymptotic safety, JHEP 01, 030, arXiv:1709.07252 [hep-th]. 13

    arXiv

  97. [105]

    Eichhorn and A

    A. Eichhorn and A. Held, Mass difference for charged quarks from asymptotically safe quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 151302 (2018), arXiv:1803.04027 [hep- th]

    2018 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Eichhorn, J

    A. Eichhorn, J. Lumma, A. D. Pereira, and A. Sikan- dar, Universal critical behavior in tensor models for four-dimensional quantum gravity, JHEP 02, 110, arXiv:1912.05314 [gr-qc]

    1912 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Ambjorn, B

    J. Ambjorn, B. Durhuus, and T. Jonsson, Three- dimensional simplicial quantum gravity and generalized matrix models, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 1133 (1991)

    1991

  100. [108]

    Sasakura, Tensor model for gravity and orientability of manifold, Mod

    N. Sasakura, Tensor model for gravity and orientability of manifold, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6, 2613 (1991)

    1991

  101. [109]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. H. Ginsparg, and J. Zinn-Justin, 2-D Gravity and random matrices, Phys. Rept. 254, 1 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9306153

    1995 arXiv

  102. [110]

    ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Inter- actions, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Inter- actions, Nucl. Phys. B 72, 461 (1974)

    1974

  103. [111]

    Gurau, The complete 1/N expansion of colored tensor models in arbitrary dimension, Annales Henri Poincare 13, 399 (2012), arXiv:1102.5759 [gr-qc]

    R. Gurau, The complete 1/N expansion of colored tensor models in arbitrary dimension, Annales Henri Poincare 13, 399 (2012), arXiv:1102.5759 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  104. [112]

    R. G. Gur˘ au,Random tensors (Oxford University Press, 2017)

    2017

  105. [113]

    Bonzom, R

    V. Bonzom, R. Gurau, A. Riello, and V. Rivasseau, Crit- ical behavior of colored tensor models in the large N limit, Nucl. Phys. B 853, 174 (2011), arXiv:1105.3122 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Sachdev and J

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993), arXiv:cond-mat/9212030 [cond- mat]

    1993 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, KITP strings seminar and Entanglement 2015 (Feb

    A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, KITP strings seminar and Entanglement 2015 (Feb. 12, April 7, and May 27, 2015)

    2015

  108. [116]

    Witten, An SYK-Like Model Without Disorder, J

    E. Witten, An SYK-Like Model Without Disorder, J. Phys. A 52, 474002 (2019), arXiv:1610.09758 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Narovlansky and H

    V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde, Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter Holography, arXiv:2310.16994 [hep-th] (2023), arXiv Preprint

    2023 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Giombi, I

    S. Giombi, I. R. Klebanov, and G. Tarnopolsky, Bosonic tensor models at large N and small ϵ, Phys. Rev. D 96, 106014 (2017), arXiv:1707.03866 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Bulycheva, I

    K. Bulycheva, I. R. Klebanov, A. Milekhin, and G. Tarnopolsky, Spectra of Operators in Large N Tensor Models, Phys. Rev. D 97, 026016 (2018), arXiv:1707.09347 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Carrozza and A

    S. Carrozza and A. Tanasa, O(N ) Random Ten- sor Models, Lett. Math. Phys. 106, 1531 (2016), arXiv:1512.06718 [math-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Benedetti, R

    D. Benedetti, R. Gurau, and S. Harribey, Line of fixed points in a bosonic tensor model, JHEP 06, 053, arXiv:1903.03578 [hep-th]

    1903 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Benedetti, R

    D. Benedetti, R. Gurau, S. Harribey, and K. Suzuki, Hints of unitarity at large N in the O(N )3 tensor field theory, JHEP 02, 072, [Erratum: JHEP 08, 167 (2020)], arXiv:1909.07767 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Benedetti, R

    D. Benedetti, R. Gurau, S. Harribey, and D. Lettera, The F-theorem in the melonic limit, JHEP 02, 147, arXiv:2111.11792 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  116. [124]

    Benedetti, R

    D. Benedetti, R. Gurau, and S. Harribey, Trifundamen- tal quartic model, Phys. Rev. D 103, 046018 (2021), arXiv:2011.11276 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  117. [125]

    R. G. Gurau, Notes on tensor models and tensor field theories, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare D Comb. Phys. Inter- act. 9, 159 (2022), arXiv:1907.03531 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Berges, R

    J. Berges, R. Gurau, H. Keppler, and T. Preis, Cou- pling renormalization flow in the strongly interacting regime of an asymptotically free quantum field theory in four dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 110, 036007 (2024), arXiv:2405.08153 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Reichert and J

    M. Reichert and J. Smirnov, Dark Matter meets Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063015 (2020), arXiv:1911.00012 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Held, From particle physics to black holes: The pre- dictive power of asymptotic safety., Ph.D

    A. Held, From particle physics to black holes: The pre- dictive power of asymptotic safety., Ph.D. thesis, U. Hei- delberg (main) (2019)

    2019

  121. [129]

    Kowalska, S

    K. Kowalska, S. Pramanick, and E. M. Sessolo, Nat- urally small Yukawa couplings from trans-Planckian asymptotic safety, JHEP 08, 262, arXiv:2204.00866 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  122. [130]

    Chikkaballi, K

    A. Chikkaballi, K. Kowalska, and E. M. Sessolo, Nat- urally small neutrino mass with asymptotic safety and gravitational-wave signatures, JHEP 11, 224, arXiv:2308.06114 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  123. [131]

    Eichhorn, A

    A. Eichhorn, A. Held, and C. Wetterich, Quantum- gravity predictions for the fine-structure constant, Phys. Lett. B 782, 198 (2018), arXiv:1711.02949 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Eichhorn, A

    A. Eichhorn, A. Held, and C. Wetterich, Predictive power of grand unification from quantum gravity, JHEP 08, 111, arXiv:1909.07318 [hep-th]

    1909 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Kowalska, E

    K. Kowalska, E. M. Sessolo, and Y. Yamamoto, Flavor anomalies from asymptotically safe gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 272 (2021), arXiv:2007.03567 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Kowalska and E

    K. Kowalska and E. M. Sessolo, Minimal models for g-2 and dark matter confront asymptotic safety, Phys. Rev. D 103, 115032 (2021), arXiv:2012.15200 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Chikkaballi, W

    A. Chikkaballi, W. Kotlarski, K. Kowalska, D. Rizzo, and E. M. Sessolo, Constraints on Z’ solutions to the fla- vor anomalies with trans-Planckian asymptotic safety, JHEP 01, 164, arXiv:2209.07971 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  128. [136]

    J.-E. Daum, U. Harst, and M. Reuter, Running Gauge Coupling in Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity, JHEP 01, 084, arXiv:0910.4938 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  129. [137]

    Harst and M

    U. Harst and M. Reuter, QED coupled to QEG, JHEP 05, 119, arXiv:1101.6007 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  130. [138]

    Folkerts, D

    S. Folkerts, D. F. Litim, and J. M. Pawlowski, Asymp- totic freedom of Yang-Mills theory with gravity, Phys. Lett. B 709, 234 (2012), arXiv:1101.5552 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Christiansen and A

    N. Christiansen and A. Eichhorn, An asymptotically safe solution to the U(1) triviality problem, Phys. Lett. B 770, 154 (2017), arXiv:1702.07724 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Zinn-Justin, Quantum field theory and critical phenomena, International Series of Monographs on Physics, Vol

    J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum field theory and critical phenomena, International Series of Monographs on Physics, Vol. 77 (Oxford University Press, 2021) 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198509233.001.0001

    2021

  133. [141]

    D. F. Litim, Optimized renormalization group flows, Phys. Rev. D 64, 105007 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0103195

    2001 arXiv

  134. [142]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, The nonper- turbative functional renormalization group and its ap- plications, Phys. Rept. 910, 1 (2021), arXiv:2006.04853 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2021 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Falls, D

    K. Falls, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos, and C. Rahmede, Further evidence for asymptotic safety of quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 93, 104022 (2016), arXiv:1410.4815 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Falls, C

    K. Falls, C. R. King, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopoulos, and C. Rahmede, Asymptotic safety of quantum gravity 14 beyond Ricci scalars, Phys. Rev. D 97, 086006 (2018), arXiv:1801.00162 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  137. [145]

    K. G. Falls, D. F. Litim, and J. Schr¨ oder, Aspects of asymptotic safety for quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 99, 126015 (2019), arXiv:1810.08550 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Eichhorn and M

    A. Eichhorn and M. Pauly, Constraining power of asymptotic safety for scalar fields, Phys. Rev. D 103, 026006 (2021), arXiv:2009.13543 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Eichhorn, S

    A. Eichhorn, S. Lippoldt, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, and M. Schiffer, How perturbative is quantum gravity?, Phys. Lett. B 792, 310 (2019), arXiv:1810.02828 [hep- th]

    2019 arXiv

  140. [148]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang, and C. Vafa, Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland, arXiv:2212.06187 [hep-th] (2022), arXiv Preprint

    2022 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Eichhorn, A

    A. Eichhorn, A. Hebecker, J. M. Pawlowski, and J. Walcher, The Absolute Swampland, arXiv:2405.20386 [hep-th] (2024), arXiv Preprint

    2024 arXiv

  142. [150]

    G. P. De Brito, A. Eichhorn, and A. D. Pereira, A link that matters: Towards phenomenological tests of unimodular asymptotic safety, JHEP 09, 100, arXiv:1907.11173 [hep-th]

    1907 arXiv

  143. [151]

    R. G. Gur˘ au, Random Tensors (Oxford University Press, 2016)

    2016

  144. [152]

    Flodgren and B

    N. Flodgren and B. Sundborg, Classifying large N lim- its of multiscalar theories by algebra, JHEP 06, 108, arXiv:2312.04954 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  145. [153]

    Eichhorn and M

    A. Eichhorn and M. Pauly, Safety in darkness: Higgs portal to simple Yukawa systems, Phys. Lett. B 819, 136455 (2021), arXiv:2005.03661 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Held, Effective asymptotic safety and its predictive power: Gauge-Yukawa theories, Front

    A. Held, Effective asymptotic safety and its predictive power: Gauge-Yukawa theories, Front. in Phys. 8, 341 (2020), arXiv:2003.13642 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  147. [155]

    de Alwis, A

    S. de Alwis, A. Eichhorn, A. Held, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Schiffer, and F. Versteegen, Asymptotic safety, string theory and the weak gravity conjecture, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134991 (2019), arXiv:1907.07894 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Percacci and G

    R. Percacci and G. P. Vacca, Asymptotic Safety, Emer- gence and Minimal Length, Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 245026 (2010), arXiv:1008.3621 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.