Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Can Bayesian Neural Networks Make Confident Predictions?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.11773 v1 pith:BS5GWIAQ submitted 2025-01-20 stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.TH

classification stat.MLcs.LGmath.STstat.TH
keywords posteriorpredictivenetworklayertrainingbayesiancharacterizeclasses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Bayesian inference promises a framework for principled uncertainty quantification of neural network predictions. Barriers to adoption include the difficulty of fully characterizing posterior distributions on network parameters and the interpretability of posterior predictive distributions. We demonstrate that under a discretized prior for the inner layer weights, we can exactly characterize the posterior predictive distribution as a Gaussian mixture. This setting allows us to define equivalence classes of network parameter values which produce the same likelihood (training error) and to relate the elements of these classes to the network's scaling regime -- defined via ratios of the training sample size, the size of each layer, and the number of final layer parameters. Of particular interest are distinct parameter realizations that map to low training error and yet correspond to distinct modes in the posterior predictive distribution. We identify settings that exhibit such predictive multimodality, and thus provide insight into the accuracy of unimodal posterior approximations. We also characterize the capacity of a model to "learn from data" by evaluating contraction of the posterior predictive in different scaling regimes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rethinking Likelihood distributions: Student's t Likelihood Boosts Bayesian Neural Network Performance

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Student's t likelihood (ν=5) is a robust default for VI-trained BNNs, improving CRPS in most tested settings while occasionally losing on MSE to Gaussian under lognormal noise.

Pith tools