Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 32 references

Non-relativistic QCD Study of Excited Bottomonia at Finite Temperatures on a Fine Lattice

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Lattice QCD shows excited bottomonia keep their vacuum masses up to 250 MeV while gaining thermal widths, indicating broadening rather than screening drives dissociation.

desk verdict Fine-lattice NRQCD progress report; the width claim is a Gaussian fit parametrization, not a measured quantity, so the abstract overstates the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12777 v1 pith:42LXOMIX submitted 2025-01-22 hep-lat hep-phnucl-th

Heng-Tong Ding , Wei-Ping Huang , Rasmus Larsen , Stefan Meinel , Swagato Mukherjee , Peter Petreczky This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lathep-phnucl-th PACS 12.38.Gc12.38.Mh25.75.Nq
keywords bottomoniumquark-gluonplasmalatticeNRQCDthermalwidthin-mediummassexcitedstatesspectralfunctionquarkoniumsuppression
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Excited bottomonia are heavy quark-antiquark states whose survival in the quark-gluon plasma is a classic test of color screening. This paper uses lattice QCD with non-relativistic bottom quarks to track the 1S, 2S, 3S and 1P, 2P, 3P bottomonium states at temperatures from 133 to 250 MeV. It finds that, within uncertainties, all of these states keep their vacuum masses while acquiring thermal widths that grow with temperature and with the size of the state. If correct, this means screening of the quark-antiquark force is not what dissolves these states; instead, the dominant effect is in-medium broadening that damps the bound state. That would change how quarkonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions is interpreted.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the NRQCD Euclidean correlator $C(\tau,T) = \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d\omega\, \rho(\omega,T) e^{-\tau\omega}$, which gives a temporal range of $1/T$ rather than $1/(2T)$ and thus better sensitivity to thermal effects. Extended operators—Gaussian-smeared sources and wave-function-optimized sources obtained from solving a discretized three-dimensional bound-state wave equation—provide clean overlap with the targeted excited states. The in-medium spectral function is modeled as $\rho_{\mathrm{med}}(\omega,T) = A_{\mathrm{med}}(T)\exp[-(\omega - M_{\mathrm{med}}(T))^2/(2\Gamma_{\mathrm{med}}^2)] + A_{\mathrm{cut}}(T)\delta(\omega - \omega_{\mathrm{cut}}(T))$, with the vacuum continuum removed by subtracting a single exponential $A e^{-M\tau}$ from the zero-temperature correlator. Fitting this ansatz to the continuum-subtracted correlators yields the in-medium mass $M_{\mathrm{med}}(T)$ and width $\Gamma_{\mathrm{med}}(T)$ that carry all the paper's conclusions.

What would settle it

Fit the same continuum-subtracted correlators with a Breit-Wigner (Lorentzian) in-medium peak, the parameterization the authors describe as more natural and say they address in their companion paper. If the Lorentzian fit yields nonzero mass shifts, or widths that differ from the Gaussian widths by more than the statistical uncertainties, the paper's central claims would be contradicted; an even more direct test is a model-independent reconstruction of $\rho(\omega,T)$ from the same correlators.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the in-medium masses of $\Upsilon(nS)$ and $\chi_{b0}(nP)$ for $n = 1, 2, 3$ are equal to their vacuum values within uncertainties across $T \simeq 133$–$250$ MeV, while the extracted widths increase with temperature and obey the hierarchy $\Gamma(1S) < \Gamma(2S) < \Gamma(3S)$ and $\Gamma(1P) < \Gamma(2P) < \Gamma(3P)$. The authors take the near-zero mass shifts together with nonzero widths as evidence that screening may not be the likely source of bottomonium dissociation in the medium. They further show that these in-medium properties do not depend on which of the two extended-operator constructions is used, indicating that the extraction is not sensitive to the operator choice.

Load-bearing premise

The extraction assumes the in-medium part of the spectral function is a Gaussian peak plus a delta tail, and that the vacuum continuum is a single exponential with fitted amplitude and mass; if the true spectral shape differs from this ansatz, the reported widths and the conclusion that screening is not the dissociation mechanism do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Excited bottomonia up to the 3S and 3P states persist as well-defined quasi-states, with masses equal to their vacuum values, across the whole temperature range $T \simeq 133$–$250$ MeV.
  • Thermal widths grow with temperature and follow the size hierarchy $\Gamma(1S) < \Gamma(2S) < \Gamma(3S)$ and $\Gamma(1P) < \Gamma(2P) < \Gamma(3P)$, giving a quantitative sequential-broadening pattern.
  • The combination of unchanged masses and growing widths implies that screening of the real part of the quark-antiquark potential is not the dominant cause of bottomonium dissociation; in-medium damping is.
  • The extracted in-medium properties are insensitive to the choice between Gaussian-smeared and wave-function-optimized operators, so the results are not an artifact of the operator construction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the quasi-state picture holds, the suppression hierarchy observed in heavy-ion experiments could be read as a dynamical rate effect—larger widths for higher excited states mean faster dissociation—rather than as static screening by a shorter screening length.
  • Because the paper concedes the Gaussian ansatz is not physically motivated, the reported widths are plausibly qualitative upper bounds; a Breit-Wigner or fully reconstructed spectral function could change the width values without disturbing the near-zero mass shifts.
  • A natural next step would be to convert the extracted widths into dissociation rates and compare with open-quantum-system models of quarkonium in the plasma, making the broadening-versus-screening distinction testable against experimental yields.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This proceedings contribution reports a lattice NRQCD study of bottomonium correlators and their in-medium properties at temperatures from T ≈ 133 to 250 MeV, using a fine lattice spacing a = 0.0493 fm with (2+1)-flavor HISQ gauge configurations near the physical point. Extended operators (Gaussian-smeared and wave-function-optimized) are used to improve overlap with the ground and excited states up to 3S and 3P. The authors extract in-medium masses and widths by fitting a continuum-subtracted correlator with a Gaussian-plus-delta spectral ansatz (Eq. 6). They report that the in-medium masses are consistent with vacuum masses across the temperature range, while the extracted widths increase with temperature and are larger for excited states. From this they conclude that screening may not be the likely source of bottomonium dissociation in the medium. The paper also checks that the results are insensitive to the choice of extended operators.

Significance. If the central claims are reliable, the results are a valuable addition to the quarkonium-in-medium literature: they extend lattice NRQCD determinations of in-medium properties to the 3S and 3P excited states, which are rarely accessed, and they use a fine lattice spacing with (near-)physical light quarks. The use of two independent extended-operator constructions and the explicit check of operator dependence are strengths. The zero mass shift and the increasing width hierarchy are consistent with the general expectation of sequential thermal broadening and provide a useful constraint on model calculations. However, because the width is defined through a specific Gaussian ansatz that the paper itself calls 'not physically motivated,' the quantitative claims and the screening conclusion are only as strong as that model assumption. The manuscript acknowledges this limitation in the body but the abstract and conclusion state the results more categorically. As a proceedings paper, the contribution is worth publishing after the framing of the claims is brought into line with the method's uncertainties.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 4] The abstract states 'Our results confirm nonzero thermal widths' and Sec. 4 repeats that 'nonzero widths are observed,' but the width is a fit parameter of the Gaussian-plus-delta ansatz in Eq. (6), which the text itself describes as 'not physically motivated' with an interpretation that 'is not well-defined.' Since alternative spectral shapes (e.g., Lorentzian or asymmetric peaks) can reproduce the same continuum-subtracted correlator, the data as presented do not confirm a nonzero physical width in a model-independent sense. Please rephrase the headline claims to explicitly incorporate the ansatz dependence, or add a quantitative test showing that the extracted width is stable under plausible alternative parameterizations; the screening conclusion in Sec. 4 rests on this point.
  2. [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3)-(4)] The continuum-subtraction procedure assumes a single temperature-independent exponential C_cont(τ) obtained from a vacuum fit. If the in-medium spectral function develops a low-frequency tail or an asymmetric broadening, this subtraction can distort M_sub_eff and generate an artificial linear slope that is then interpreted as a width. The statement that small-τ effective masses are temperature independent only constrains the high-frequency part of the spectrum and does not establish temperature independence of the continuum in the frequency region relevant to the subtraction. The authors should discuss this systematic uncertainty or explicitly refer to tests in Ref. [27], since it directly affects both the extracted width and the mass shift.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (6) and Fig. 4] The five-parameter ansatz (A_med, M_med, Γ_med, A_cut, ω_cut) is fitted to a correlator with at most sixteen time slices at the highest temperature, leaving few degrees of freedom. The paper does not report the number of fitted points, χ²/dof, or the sensitivity of Γ_med to the fit-range boundaries and to the omission of the largest-τ points. The special treatment at T = 167 MeV (setting A_cut = 0 and omitting 2–4 points) is described, but no analogous stability information is given for the other temperatures. To support the quantitative widths in Fig. 4, a fit-stability analysis (or a clear reference to such an analysis in the companion paper) is needed.
  4. [Sec. 4] The conclusion that 'all bottomonium states below the open-bottom threshold can exist as well-defined quasi-states above the crossover temperature, including 3P states' is stronger than the evidence shown in this proceedings. For the 3S and 3P states at high temperature, the effective masses in Fig. 2 show a steep drop without a discernible plateau, and a Gaussian-fitted M_med alone does not establish a well-defined quasi-particle peak. A quantitative criterion (e.g., M_med > Γ_med, or a clear separation between the peak and the continuum contribution) should be stated, or the conclusion should be softened to say that the data are consistent with such quasi-states within the assumed Gaussian parameterization.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 1] Subject-verb agreement: 'The temperature dependence ... are presented' should be 'is presented.'
  2. [Sec. 3.1] The definition of τ_vac_min is internally inconsistent: the text says δM(τ) is 'less than the statistical uncertainty' but then gives 'δM(τ) < 25% × σ_Meff(τ).' Please clarify which criterion was used.
  3. [Sec. 3.2 and Fig. 4] The gray-shaded area is referenced in the text but not explained in the Fig. 4 caption; the reader cannot tell which temperature regions correspond to the single-exponential fits. Please describe it in the caption or in the text.
  4. [Sec. 3.2, after Eq. (6)] The 'width at half maximum height' is defined as √(2 ln 2) Γ_med, which is actually the half-width at half maximum (HWHM), not the full width at half maximum (FWHM). Please clarify the convention to avoid confusion with the usual physical width.
  5. [Sec. 2] The phrase 'the rotation matrix Ω_α,ij is computed at zero temperature and uniformly applied across all temperatures' is slightly awkward; consider 'computed at zero temperature and then used at all temperatures.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: reported thermal masses and widths are acknowledged best-fit parameters of an explicit Gaussian ansatz, not predictions forced by construction; the principal risk is model dependence rather than circular reasoning.

full rationale

The paper does not claim to derive in-medium bottomonium masses and widths from first principles; it extracts them as best-fit parameters of an assumed spectral shape, Eq. (6), from the lattice NRQCD correlators. The central conclusion that masses stay near their vacuum values while widths grow is therefore a property of the fitted parameters rather than a prediction statistically forced by the input in a circular way: the fits could in principle have returned large mass shifts or zero/negative widths, and the paper reports that the Gaussian description works only for the higher-temperature cases. The continuum subtraction in Eqs. (3)-(4) uses vacuum fit parameters A and M, but the in-medium parameters M_med(T) and Gamma_med(T) are independently fitted to the finite-temperature subtracted correlator, so no fitted parameter is simply renamed as a prediction. The self-citations to Refs. [25-27] supply the extended-operator construction and the Gaussian parameterization, but the paper explicitly states that 'the Gaussian form of the in-medium spectral function is not physically motivated' and that 'the interpretation of Gaussian widths as the widths of bottomonium states is not well-defined.' The ansatz is therefore not smuggled in as a derived result; it is presented as an admittedly ad hoc fitting form. The vacuum sector is checked against PDG masses, providing an external benchmark for the NRQCD setup. The potential failure mode identified by a skeptical reader—that a different spectral shape such as a Lorentzian or an asymmetric peak could reproduce the same continuum-subtracted correlators—is genuine model dependence and a correctness risk, but it is not circular reasoning in the sense of a claim reducing to its own input by construction. Accordingly, no circular step meeting the evidentiary standard of this pass was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the lattice simulation plus the assumed spectral shape. The Gaussian+delta ansatz is the main ad hoc element, and the continuum subtraction assumes temperature independence of the high-frequency part of the spectral function. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • NRQCD bottom quark mass aM_b = 0.957
    Tuned by matching the eta_b kinetic mass to the PDG value at a=0.0493 fm; taken from Ref. [25]. It is an input to the action, not derived here.
  • Gaussian in-medium width Gamma_med(T) for each state = Plot values, sqrt(2 ln 2) Gamma_med roughly 50-500 MeV depending on state and T
    Best-fit parameter in the spectral ansatz Eq. 6; it is the central quantity interpreted as the thermal width, so the claim depends on it being a physically meaningful quantity.
  • Gaussian in-medium mass M_med(T) per state = approximately vacuum mass; mass shifts within about +/-100 MeV (3S/3P) and smaller for lower states
    Best-fit Gaussian centroid; reported as mass shift in Fig. 4.
  • Delta-tail amplitude A_cut and position omega_cut = not tabulated in the proceedings
    Additional fit parameters in Eq. 6 that reproduce the large-tau drop of the continuum-subtracted effective mass.
  • Fit-range boundaries and omitted points = tau range selected by 5% and 25% statistical criteria; 2-4 largest-tau points omitted for some temperatures
    Manual selection could bias the extracted widths; systematic uncertainty from this choice is not quantified.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption NRQCD effective field theory is valid for bottom quarks at this lattice spacing, with the energy hierarchy m_q >> m_q v >> m_q v^2 and no heavy-quark pair creation.
    Invoked in Sec. 1 and used to write Eq. 2; inherited from Refs. [19-24].
  • domain assumption The spectral function decomposes into a temperature-independent continuum and an in-medium part, with the vacuum in-medium part being a single delta at mass M.
    Central to the continuum-subtracted correlator definition in Eqs. 3-4; assumed without independent verification.
  • ad hoc to paper The in-medium spectral function is a Gaussian peak plus a delta tail (Eq. 6).
    The paper explicitly states this shape is 'not physically motivated'; the entire width extraction depends on it.
  • domain assumption The GEVP rotation matrix Omega computed at T=0 remains valid at all temperatures.
    Stated in Sec. 2: 'the rotation matrix ... is computed at zero temperature and uniformly applied across all temperatures.'

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-relativistic QCD Study of Excited Bottomonia at Finite Temperatures on a Fine Lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/42LXOMIX

@misc{pith2026250112777,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-relativistic QCD Study of Excited Bottomonia at Finite Temperatures on a Fine Lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/42LXOMIX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12777}
}
abstract

The temperature dependence of bottomonium correlators up to the 3S and 3P excited states are presented in the range $T \simeq 133-250$ MeV. These lattice calculations employ the non-relativistic QCD (NRQCD) approach for bottom quarks on (2+1)-flavor gauge backgrounds, using the highly improved staggered quark (HISQ) action near the physical point. The study utilizes a fine lattice spacing of 0.0493 fm at all temperatures. Extended bottomonium operators are implemented to achieve optimized overlaps with the targeted excited states, enhancing sensitivity to thermal effects. To probe in-medium modifications of excited bottomonia, we extract thermal widths and in-medium masses from bottomonium correlators, parameterizing the spectral function with a Gaussian ansatz. Our results confirm nonzero thermal widths for various bottomonium states as the temperature increases, while no significant mass shifts are observed. Additionally, we check that the in-medium properties of bottomonia are almost not affected by variations in the choice of extended operators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.12777 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The effective masses at zero temperature for Υ (left) and 𝜒𝑏0 (right) correlators, from Gaussian￾smeared extended sources (triangle) and wave-function-optimized sources (circle) respectively. The vertical scale is calibrated with the spin-average mass of 1S bottomonia at 𝑇 = 0, given by 𝑀¯ 1𝑆 = (𝑀𝜂𝑏 + 3𝑀Υ)/4. Both Gaussian and wave-function-optimized operators are effective in overlapping with targeted states, as cl… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Temperature dependence of effective masses for Υ(𝑛S) (top) and 𝜒𝑏0 (𝑛P) (bottom) with 𝑛 =1, 2 and 3, measured using wave-function-optimized operators. The vertical scale is calibrated with the spin￾average mass of 1S bottomonia at 𝑇 = 0. As for the effective masses calculated from Gaussian-smeared operators, qualitatively the same behavior can be seen, but there are quantitative difference compared with the results … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The continuum-subtracted effective masses with various temperatures for different excited states of Υ (top) and 𝜒𝑏0 (bottom). The bands are reconstructed from fits using the Gaussian ansatz (cf. Eq. 6), as discussed in the text. The vertical scale is calibrated with the spin-averaged mass of 1S bottomonia at 𝑇 = 0. To extract in-medium properties, we adopt the Gaussian parameterization for the in-medium part of the … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Temperature dependence of mass shifts (top) and in-medium widths (bottom), defined as the Gaussian widths at half maximum height, for Υ(𝑛S) and 𝜒𝑏0 (𝑛P) with 𝑛 =1, 2 and 3 obtained from Gaussian fits on the continuum-subtracted correlators for the temperatures outside …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Ding, W.P

    H.T. Ding, W.P. Huang, R. Larsen, S. Meinel, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky et al.,In-medium bottomonium properties from lattice NRQCD calculations with extended meson operators, 2501.11257

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Matsui and H

    T. Matsui and H. Satz,𝐽/𝜓 Suppression by Quark-Gluon Plasma Formation, Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 416

    1986

  3. [2]

    Satz,Quarkonium Binding and Dissociation: The Spectral Analysis of the QGP, Nucl

    H. Satz,Quarkonium Binding and Dissociation: The Spectral Analysis of the QGP, Nucl. Phys. A783(2007) 249 [hep-ph/0609197]. 9 NRQCD Study of Excited Bottomonia Wei-Ping Huang

    arXiv 2007

  4. [3]

    NA60collaboration, J/psi production in p-A and A-A collisions at fixed target experiments, Nucl. Phys. A830(2009) 345C [0907.5004]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  5. [4]

    PHENIXcollaboration, J/psi Production in s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV Cu+Cu Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.101 (2008) 122301 [0801.0220]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  6. [5]

    CMScollaboration, Indications of suppression of excitedΥstates in PbPb collisions at√𝑆 𝑁 𝑁 = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011) 052302 [1105.4894]

    arXiv 2011

  7. [6]

    CMS collaboration,Observation of Sequential Upsilon Suppression in PbPb Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.109 (2012) 222301 [1208.2826]

    arXiv 2012

  8. [7]

    STARcollaboration,Γ measurements in Au+Au collisions at√𝑠𝑁 𝑁 =200GeV with the STAR experiment,Nucl. Phys. A982 (2019) 723

    work page 2019

Show all 32 references
  1. [8]

    Karsch, D

    F. Karsch, D. Kharzeev and H. Satz,Sequential charmonium dissociation,Phys. Lett. B637 (2006) 75 [hep-ph/0512239]

    2006 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Aarts et al.,Heavy-flavor production and medium properties in high-energy nuclear collisions - What next?, Eur

    G. Aarts et al.,Heavy-flavor production and medium properties in high-energy nuclear collisions - What next?, Eur. Phys. J. A53(2017) 93 [1612.08032]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Mocsy, P

    A. Mocsy, P. Petreczky and M. Strickland,Quarkonia in the Quark Gluon Plasma, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28 (2013) 1340012 [1302.2180]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Laine, O

    M. Laine, O. Philipsen, P. Romatschke and M. Tassler,Real-time static potential in hot QCD, JHEP 03 (2007) 054 [hep-ph/0611300]

    2007 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Brambilla, J

    N. Brambilla, J. Ghiglieri, A. Vairo and P. Petreczky,Static quark-antiquark pairs at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 014017 [0804.0993]

    2008 arXiv

  6. [13]

    HotQCD collaboration,Static quark-antiquark interactions at nonzero temperature from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 054513 [2110.11659]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [14]

    HotQCD collaboration,Unscreened forces in the quark-gluon plasma?, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 074504 [2308.16587]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Jakovac, P

    A. Jakovac, P. Petreczky, K. Petrov and A. Velytsky,Quarkonium correlators and spectral functions at zero and finite temperature,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 014506 [hep-lat/0611017]

    2007 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Petreczky,Quarkonium in Hot Medium, J

    P. Petreczky,Quarkonium in Hot Medium, J. Phys. G37(2010) 094009 [1001.5284]

    2010 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Mocsy and P

    A. Mocsy and P. Petreczky,Can quarkonia survive deconfinement?, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 014501 [0705.2559]

    2008 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Petreczky,On temperature dependence of quarkonium correlators, Eur

    P. Petreczky,On temperature dependence of quarkonium correlators, Eur. Phys. J. C62 (2009) 85 [0810.0258]

    2009 arXiv

  12. [19]

    G.P.Lepage,L.Magnea,C.Nakhleh,U.MagneaandK.Hornbostel, Improvednonrelativistic QCD for heavy quark physics, Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 4052 [hep-lat/9205007]. 10 NRQCD Study of Excited Bottomonia Wei-Ping Huang

    1992 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Thacker and G.P

    B.A. Thacker and G.P. Lepage,Heavy quark bound states in lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D43 (1991) 196

    1991

  14. [21]

    Aarts, S

    G. Aarts, S. Kim, M.P. Lombardo, M.B. Oktay, S.M. Ryan, D.K. Sinclair et al.,Bottomonium above deconfinement in lattice nonrelativistic QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 061602 [1010.3725]

    2011 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Aarts, C

    G. Aarts, C. Allton, T. Harris, S. Kim, M.P. Lombardo, S.M. Ryan et al.,The bottomonium spectrum at finite temperature from N𝑓 = 2 + 1 lattice QCD, JHEP 07(2014) 097 [1402.6210]

    2014 arXiv

  16. [23]

    S. Kim, P. Petreczky and A. Rothkopf,Lattice NRQCD study of S- and P-wave bottomonium states in a thermal medium with𝑁 𝑓 = 2+ 1 light flavors, Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 054511 [1409.3630]

    2015 arXiv

  17. [24]

    S. Kim, P. Petreczky and A. Rothkopf,Quarkonium in-medium properties from realistic lattice NRQCD,JHEP 11(2018) 088 [1808.08781]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Larsen, S

    R. Larsen, S. Meinel, S. Mukherjee and P. Petreczky,Thermal broadening of bottomonia: Lattice nonrelativistic QCD with extended operators, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 074506 [1908.08437]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Larsen, S

    R. Larsen, S. Meinel, S. Mukherjee and P. Petreczky,Excited bottomonia in quark-gluon plasma from lattice QCD, Phys. Lett. B800(2020) 135119 [1910.07374]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Meinel,Bottomonium spectrum at order𝑣6 from domain-wall lattice QCD: Precise results for hyperfine splittings, Phys

    S. Meinel,Bottomonium spectrum at order𝑣6 from domain-wall lattice QCD: Precise results for hyperfine splittings, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 114502 [1007.3966]

    2010 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Blossier, M

    B. Blossier, M. Della Morte, G. von Hippel, T. Mendes and R. Sommer,On the generalized eigenvalue method for energies and matrix elements in lattice field theory, JHEP 04(2009) 094 [0902.1265]

    2009 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Orginos and D

    K. Orginos and D. Richards,Improved methods for the study of hadronic physics from lattice QCD, J. Phys. G42(2015) 034011

    2015

  23. [31]

    Nochi, T

    K. Nochi, T. Kawanai and S. Sasaki,Bethe-Salpeter wave functions of𝜂𝑐(2𝑆) and𝜓(2𝑆) states from full lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 114514 [1608.02340]

    2016 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Particle Data Groupcollaboration, Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 030001. 11

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.