Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Test-Time Preference Optimization: On-the-Fly Alignment via Iterative Textual Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.12895 v1 pith:DVGH2NGO submitted 2025-01-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords alignmentpreferencehumanoptimizationpreferencestest-timetextualduring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive performance but lack the flexibility to adapt to human preferences quickly without retraining. In this work, we introduce Test-time Preference Optimization (TPO), a framework that aligns LLM outputs with human preferences during inference, removing the need to update model parameters. Rather than relying on purely numerical rewards, TPO translates reward signals into textual critiques and uses them as textual rewards to iteratively refine its response. Evaluations on benchmarks covering instruction following, preference alignment, safety, and mathematics reveal that TPO progressively improves alignment with human preferences. Notably, after only a few TPO steps, the initially unaligned Llama-3.1-70B-SFT model can surpass the aligned counterpart, Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct. Furthermore, TPO scales efficiently with both the search width and depth during inference. Through case studies, we illustrate how TPO exploits the innate capacity of LLM to interpret and act upon reward signals. Our findings establish TPO as a practical, lightweight alternative for test-time preference optimization, achieving alignment on the fly. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/yafuly/TPO.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robust Critics: Defending LLMs Against Multi-Turn Attacks

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Critic-weighted sampling over inferred user intents improves multi-turn LLM defense success while preserving helpfulness, with an expected-Q improvement guarantee and transfer to frontier models.

  2. TRPrompt: Bootstrapping Query-Aware Prompt Optimization from Textual Rewards

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TRPrompt trains an 8B prompt model directly on natural-language textual rewards and reports the highest accuracies on GSMHard and MATH among the compared methods.

  3. Self-Reflective Generation at Test Time

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SRGen improves LLM math reasoning by detecting high-entropy tokens and injecting a small corrected vector into the hidden state at those points during decoding, without training.

  4. Temporal Self-Rewarding Language Models: Decoupling Chosen-Rejected via Past-Future

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Anchoring rejected responses to the initial model and choosing responses from a future model raises AlpacaEval 2.0 win rate from 19.69 to 29.44 for Llama3.1-8B.

Pith tools