Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 96 references

Multi-scale physics of cryogenic liquid helium-4: Inverse coarse-graining properties of smoothed particle hydrodynamics

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that smoothed particle hydrodynamics, run on the classical two-fluid model, produces kernel-truncation noise that can stand in for the microscopic fluctuations of quantum helium-4, and that the spin-conserving viscosity…

desk verdict A self-aware, interpretive paper that reads SPH truncation error as inverse LES and the Condiff rotational viscosity as a Biot-Savart SGS closure, but the central statistical equivalence is never tested on real helium-4 fields. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14244 v7 pith:BLHTN75N submitted 2025-01-24 physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.otherphysics.comp-ph

Satori Tsuzuki This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyncond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.otherphysics.comp-ph
keywords liquidhelium-4two-fluidmodelsmoothedparticlehydrodynamicslargeeddysimulationsubgrid-scalespinangularmomentumconservationquantumvorticesinversecoarse-graining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the classical and quantum two-fluid descriptions of cryogenic helium-4 are connected by scale transformations: large-eddy-simulation filtering projects the microscopic quantum description onto the macroscopic scale, while the smoothing step of smoothed particle hydrodynamics performs the inverse transformation, projecting macroscopic fields back into microscopic-looking fluctuations. The load-bearing consequence is that SPH kernel truncation error, which grows with kernel radius, can serve as a stand-in for the subgrid fluctuations that a quantum treatment would supply, so classical SPH simulations can reproduce quantum-looking vortex lattices and counterflow profiles. The paper further claims that the spin-angular-momentum-conserving rotational viscosity term is formally a subgrid-scale model, and that under a point-vortex approximation it reduces to Biot-Savart vortex interactions, embedding quantum vortex physics into a classical two-fluid solver. The author is explicit that the resemblance between numerical noise and physical fluctuations is a speculative analogy rather than a first-principle derivation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the SPH kernel-approximation error $f^{\rm SPH}_\epsilon$, defined by $f = \bar f + f^{\rm SPH}_\epsilon$ after replacing the Dirac delta function with a Gaussian kernel. The Taylor expansion of this replacement shows that $f^{\rm SPH}_\epsilon$ is a sum of even powers of the kernel width $h$, so larger smoothing widths produce larger apparent fluctuations. A second machinery element is the white-noise assumption of Eq. (29), that the third derivative of the field is Gaussian white noise; Monte Carlo convolution with the kernel then yields white-noise autocorrelation and flat power spectra. The third element is the rotational viscosity term $2\eta_r\nabla\times\omega_0$ in the Condiff viscosity model, which, when $\omega_0$ is defined via a $1/|r|$ convolution, is rearranged into a Biot-Savart integral over quantum vortex filaments, turning the term into a subgrid-scale closure.

What would settle it

Compute the third derivative of a physical field from an actual SPH simulation of the two-fluid model and measure its spatial autocorrelation and power spectrum: if the autocorrelation is not delta-like or the spectrum is not flat across the relevant wavenumbers, the white-noise premise of Eq. (29) fails, so the truncation error cannot serve as a statistically faithful substitute for microscopic fluctuations. A complementary check is to compare the velocity-fluctuation statistics produced by varying kernel radius $h$ against experimental or high-resolution quantum simulation data for superfluid helium-4.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that SPH discretization of the classical two-fluid model is an inverse coarse-graining operation: the same Taylor expansion that defines the LES filtering error defines the SPH kernel approximation error, with opposite sign when the Gaussian kernel is used for both. Thus $f^{\rm SPH}_\epsilon$ corresponds to $-f^{\rm LES}_\epsilon$, and the truncation error behaves like a white-noise subgrid fluctuation when the third derivative of the field is spatially uncorrelated Gaussian white noise. This makes the kernel radius $h$ the control knob for fluctuation amplitude, which explains why the author's simulations reproduce microscopic-scale fluctuations at macroscopic scales. The spin-angular-momentum-conserving term in the viscous fluid equation is shown to correspond to the divergence of the SGS stress tensor, and with the macroscopic spin field defined by a $1/|r|$ convolution, the rotational viscosity term becomes a Biot-Savart integral over quantum vortex filaments, giving a concrete SGS closure for the two-fluid model.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative bridge rests on assuming that the third derivative of the physical field is spatially uncorrelated Gaussian white noise; if real SPH fields in cryogenic helium-4 do not have white-noise third derivatives, the claim that kernel truncation error reproduces microscopic fluctuations loses its basis, and the Biot-Savart result additionally depends on choosing a $1/|r|$ convolution for the spin field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Classical hydrodynamic two-fluid SPH simulations can reproduce quantum-looking vortex lattices and counterflow profiles because kernel smoothing supplies the missing subgrid fluctuation statistics, with amplitude controlled by the kernel radius $h$.
  • The spin-angular-momentum-conserving viscosity term can be read as an SGS model: it transfers small-scale vortex motion into the macroscopic equations, and under point-vortex quantization it reduces to Biot-Savart interactions.
  • The normal fluid should be viewed as a mixture of inviscid and viscous fluid particles; molecular viscosity acts at microscopic scales, while large-scale effective viscosity is dominated by eddy viscosity, so in laminar regimes the normal fluid can be treated as inviscid.
  • Larger kernel radii amplify microscopic fluctuations but require higher particle density to maintain the regularity condition, so reproducing quantum-like fluctuations carries a computational cost.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The white-noise equivalence suggests a design principle: SPH truncation noise could be deliberately calibrated, rather than suppressed, as a cheap stochastic subgrid model for weakly compressible flows beyond helium-4.
  • The same scale-transformation argument should apply to other particle methods, such as MPS, where density fluctuations are also a few percent; if their truncation errors share the white-noise property, the analogy generalizes.
  • A testable extension is to run two SPH simulations of the same macroscopic helium-4 flow with different kernel radii and compare fluctuation amplitude to the even-power scaling in $h$ predicted by the Taylor expansion; a clean power law would support the mechanism, and a failure would expose missing corrections.
  • Because the Biot-Savart result follows from choosing a $1/|r|$ convolution for the spin field, a different, physically motivated coarse-graining kernel would produce a different closure; checking which form best matches mutual-friction data would distinguish the model from alternatives.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that classical and quantum hydrodynamic two-fluid models of liquid helium-4 can be connected by scale transformations: LES filtering maps microscopic to macroscopic scales, while SPH smoothing provides an inverse transformation. It claims that SPH truncation errors can, under specified conditions, stand in for physical microscopic fluctuations, and that the Condiff rotational-viscosity term can be interpreted as a subgrid-scale model containing Biot-Savart vortex interactions. The manuscript reviews the author's earlier SPH simulations of vortex lattices and counterflow, derives the formal Taylor-expansion relation between kernel smoothing and LES filtering, presents a Monte Carlo test of the whiteness of the SPH truncation error, and concludes with a speculative picture of the microscopic composition of liquid helium-4.

Significance. If the substitution claim were quantitatively established, the paper would offer a practical multiscale bridge between classical CFD simulations and quantum two-fluid behavior. The formal kernel/filter correspondence in Section 3.1 is standard and useful, and the paper is commendably explicit about the speculative character of the analogy. However, the load-bearing statistical equivalence is not demonstrated: the whiteness test assumes the very property it claims to verify, and the Biot-Savart form in Section 3.2 is largely built into the postulated convolution. The paper therefore has value as a clearly framed formal analogy and as a research program statement, but not yet as an established physical connection.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (30) and Fig. 6] The Monte Carlo test does not establish condition (ii). The quantity fε^(2)(x) defined in Eq. (30) is a convolution of the assumed white noise with the deterministic kernel r^3 W(r,h), so its power spectral density is proportional to |K̂(k)|^2 and is not flat for wavenumbers k ≳ 1/h when h = 0.2. In addition, the Taylor remainder contains an integration point θ = θ(x,r) that depends on x and r, so treating it as a fixed convolution is not mathematically justified. The paper also never measures the third-derivative statistics of actual SPH fields in the helium-4 simulations, so the white-noise property of the SPH truncation error is assumed rather than demonstrated.
  2. [Abstract and §3.1, conditions (i)–(iii)] The central assertion that SPH truncation errors can substitute for physical microscopic fluctuations is not supported by quantitative evidence. No estimate of f_SPH^epsilon is given for the counterflow or vortex-lattice simulations, and no comparison is made with the expected spectrum of thermal or quantum fluctuations in helium-II at the corresponding scales. The manuscript itself states in the abstract, §3, and §4 that the resemblance 'lacks first-principle justification' and should be viewed as a 'speculative analogy.' The paper should either supply a quantitative comparison or consistently present the result as a formal analogy rather than as a demonstrated connection.
  3. [§3.2, Eq. (39)] The 1/|r| convolution defining the macroscopic spin field ω0 is postulated rather than derived, and it introduces an unspecified constant C_q. Because Eq. (43) follows directly from inserting the filament vorticity (42) into this postulated convolution, the Biot-Savart form is built into the construction. To make the SGS identification substantive, the convolution should be derived from a filtering operation on the microscopic vortex field, and C_q should be fixed by a physical normalization such as the quantum of circulation.
  4. [§3.2, Eq. (41)] The assertion that the second term F[2η_r ∇×ω0] vanishes for quantum vortices is not justified for singular filament vorticity. The curl of a delta-distributed vorticity field, as in Eq. (42), does not automatically vanish in a distributional sense, so the recurrence argument leading to Eq. (43) requires a careful treatment of the filament singularity. Without that treatment, Eq. (43) is an algebraic restatement of Eq. (39) rather than a derivation.
  5. [§2, Fig. 3 and §3.3] The counterflow velocity profiles are reproduced by adjusting the initial distribution of viscous particles to match the target vortex-line-density profile, so the tail-flattened profile is a prescribed input rather than an emergent prediction. This does not invalidate the formal analogy, but the results of Fig. 3 cannot be cited as independent evidence for the inverse coarse-graining mechanism, as is done in §3.3.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eqs. (20)–(28)] The notation does not visually distinguish the true value, the kernel-filtered value, and the LES-filtered value, because the overbars are lost or used inconsistently; please define explicit symbols such as f, f^W, and f^G throughout.
  2. [§3.1, Eq. (30)] The prefactor, sign, and θ dependence of the Taylor remainder term fε^(2) are not derived; please show the intermediate steps leading from Eq. (25) to Eq. (30).
  3. [Fig. 6] The Monte Carlo estimators for the autocorrelation function and power spectral density are not fully specified; please state the normalization, frequency range, sample size, and error bars so the whiteness claim can be checked.
  4. [§3.3] The phrase 'local field ionization' is used without definition or supporting discussion; please clarify what is meant and how it connects to the cited helium-3 and ion experiments.
  5. [Figs. 1–4] No code or data availability statement is provided for the simulations shown; please add a reproducibility statement, even if only as a link to prior work or a data repository.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Biot–Savart correspondence is forced by the 1/|r| convolution postulate (Eq. 39), and the white-noise validation of SPH truncation error assumes the statistical property it claims to demonstrate; the paper itself labels the core analogy speculative.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.2, Eqs. (39)–(43)]
    "for ω0(r, t), we admit that ω0(r, t) can be obtained by the convolution integration of ω0 with a distance function 1/|r| as follows: ... ω0(r, t) B 1 Cq ∫ ω0(r′, t)/|r− r′| dr′ ... Notably, the right-hand side of Eq. (43) corresponds to the Biot–Savart law."

    The claimed result that the Condiff rotational-viscosity term acts as an SGS model containing Biot–Savart vortex interactions is an algebraic unfolding of the postulate in Eq. (39). The macroscopic spin field is defined as the 1/|r| convolution of the microscopic spin field; applying the curl and dropping the second term in Eq. (41) then yields exactly the Biot–Savart kernel in Eq. (43). The output is thus built into the chosen convolution kernel rather than derived from independent physics. Had a Gaussian or other kernel been chosen, the Biot–Savart form would not appear.

  2. self definitional [Section 3.1, Eq. (29) and Fig. 6]
    "Let f be a stochastic function, and assume that its third derivative is spatially uncorrelated Gaussian noise from the perspective of the maximum entropy: d3 f/dx3 (x):=η(x), η (x)∼N (0,σ2 p) ... The results in (a) and (b) collectively demonstrate that when the physical quantity f exhibits white noise behavior, the truncation error f SPH ε resulting from its kernel approximation also displays white noise characteristics."

    The test of condition (ii) assumes in Eq. (29) that the third derivative of the physical quantity is Gaussian white noise, then verifies that convolving that white noise with the kernel produces a white-noise-like truncation error (Fig. 6). The statistical property claimed for real SPH fields—white-noise-like fluctuations—is therefore the assumed input, not an independently measured property of helium-4 SPH fields. Actual fields contain vortices, interfaces, and particle disorder, and their statistics are never measured. The conclusion is a restatement of the assumption under a kernel convolution rather than independent support for the substitution claim.

full rationale

The formal Taylor-expansion equivalence between SPH kernel smoothing and LES filtering (Eqs. 24–28) is mathematically self-contained and not circular; the identity f_SPH_ε = −f_LES_ε for a Gaussian kernel follows algebraically from the expansion. The paper's physical claims, however, contain two construction-based steps. First, the claim that the Condiff rotational-viscosity term serves as an SGS model incorporating Biot–Savart vortex interactions is forced by Eq. (39), which postulates that the macroscopic spin field ω0 is the 1/|r| convolution of the microscopic spin field; after applying the curl and dropping the second term in Eq. (41), Eq. (43) is precisely the Biot–Savart kernel, so the result is an algebraic consequence of the chosen kernel rather than an emergent prediction. Second, the only test offered for the central substitution claim—that SPH truncation error can stand in for physical micro-fluctuations—assumes in Eq. (29) that d³f/dx³ is Gaussian white noise and then verifies that the convolution of that white noise with the kernel is white-noise-like (Fig. 6). Condition (ii) is therefore tested on a synthetic field whose statistics are the very statistics claimed for real SPH fields; actual helium-4 SPH fields are never measured. The paper repeatedly and honestly labels the resemblance 'a speculative analogy lacking first-principle justification,' and the prior author simulations [27–30] are cited without shipped code or independent data, but the main driver of the partial circularity is the two construction-based steps: the Biot–Savart result and the white-noise demonstration reduce to their own inputs. Hence a score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on the author's prior two-fluid SPH model (self-cited Refs. [27-30]), on a white-noise assumption for third derivatives, and on an ad hoc convolution rule for the spin field. These are the main unpaid inputs; the Taylor expansion and vector identities are standard.

free parameters (4)
  • Kernel width h = h in {0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2} for Monte Carlo; unspecified in prior simulations
    Chosen by hand; the paper argues larger h amplifies the SPH truncation error, so the amplitude of reproduced fluctuations is tunable rather than predicted.
  • White-noise variance sigma_p^2 = Not specified in physical units
    Input to the Monte Carlo test in Eq. (29); no calibration against helium-4 data is provided.
  • Rotational viscosity eta_r and constant Cq = Undetermined
    Appear in Eqs. (39) and (43); the Biot-Savart correspondence absorbs them into a constant, so no quantitative SGS prediction is made.
  • Initial distribution of viscous fluid particles = Uniform or wall-concentrated depending on target profile
    Adjusted in prior counterflow simulations to reproduce tail-flattened, center-flattened, or parabolic profiles, so those profiles are not independent predictions.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The classical hydrodynamic two-fluid model (Eqs. 12-14) is a valid macroscopic description of liquid helium-4.
    The paper starts from the model developed in Refs. [27-30] and assumes it applies at centimeter scales.
  • ad hoc to paper SPH fluid particles can be interpreted as coarse-grained Bose particles.
    Introduction states this connection 'has yet to be firmly established' and is used to motivate quantum-like features.
  • ad hoc to paper The third derivative of the physical quantity is spatially uncorrelated Gaussian white noise.
    Imposed in Eq. (29) from the maximum-entropy perspective and used to show the truncation error is white noise.
  • ad hoc to paper The macroscopic spin field is the 1/|r| convolution of the microscopic spin field.
    Introduced in Eq. (39) with arbitrary constant Cq so that the rotational viscosity term can be rewritten in Biot-Savart form.
  • domain assumption Quantum vortices are minimal, so no smaller-scale vortices exist below them.
    Needed for the second term in Eq. (41) to vanish, allowing Eq. (43) to reduce to the Biot-Savart law.
  • standard math The SPH kernel approximation Taylor expansion converges under a regularity condition.
    Used in Eqs. (22)-(25) and supported by Ref. [75]; requires sufficient particle density within the support radius.
invented entities (2)
  • Macroscopic spin field obtained by 1/|r| convolution
    purpose: Represents spin angular velocity at macroscopic scale and generates the Biot-Savart-like term in Eq. (43).
    Introduced by Eq. (39) with an arbitrary constant; no measurable prediction outside the paper.
  • Virtual SPH particle as a bundle of quantum vortices
    purpose: Interprets coarse-grained fluid particles as representatives of quantum vortex bundles.
    Proposed in Section 1; no independent falsifiable handle is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-scale physics of cryogenic liquid helium-4: Inverse coarse-graining properties of smoothed particle hydrodynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BLHTN75N

@misc{pith2026250114244,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-scale physics of cryogenic liquid helium-4: Inverse coarse-graining properties of smoothed particle hydrodynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BLHTN75N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14244}
}
read the original abstract

Our recent numerical studies on cryogenic liquid helium-4 highlight key features of multiscale physics that can be captured using the two-fluid model. In this paper, we demonstrated that classical and quantum hydrodynamic two-fluid models are connected via scale transformations: large eddy simulation (LES) filtering links microscopic to macroscopic scales, while inverse scale transformation through SPH connects macro back to microscales. We showed that the spin angular momentum conservation term, introduced as a quantum-like correction, formally corresponds to a subgrid-scale (SGS) model derived from this transformation. Moreover, solving the classical hydrodynamic two-fluid model with SPH appears to reproduce microscopic-scale fluctuations at macroscopic scales. The amplitude of these fluctuations depends on the kernel radius. This effect may arise from truncation errors from kernel smoothing, which can qualitatively resemble such fluctuations. However, this resemblance lacks first-principle justification and should be viewed as a speculative analogy rather than a physically grounded effect. Our theoretical analysis further suggests that the Condiff viscosity model can act as an SGS model, incorporating quantum vortex interactions under point-vortex approximation into the two-fluid framework. These findings provide new insight into the microscopic structure of cryogenic helium-4 within a multiscale context. Notably, the normal fluid can be understood as a mixture of inviscid and viscous fluid particles. While molecular viscosity renders the normal fluid at microscopic scales, its small magnitude contributes little to the large-scale effective viscosity, which includes both molecular and eddy viscosities; therefore, in laminar regimes where eddy viscosity is negligible, the normal fluid may be effectively treated as inviscid at large scales if molecular viscosity is sufficiently small.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14244 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Snapshot of the simulation performed under the same conditions as those reported in Refs. [27, 28]. (a) shows the intensity distribution of the particle velocity, and (b) is an enlarged view of (a), visualized by the direction and intensity of the rotational force of individual vortices as arrow vectors and color maps, respectively. these particles lack intrinsic meaning and merely approximate the continuum. However… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Snapshot of the simulation performed under the same conditions as those reported in Ref. [29]; the liquid helium-4 can be observed rotating only in the horizontal direction with a certain thickness. tends to flatten the center, while wall-localized vortices yield a tail-flattened profile. Because quantum vortices are stable and nondissipative, their interaction with the fluid can be modeled as a fluid–structure inte… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of the simulation results of the counterflow using our two-fluid model based on classical hydrodynamics, demonstrating that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Snapshot of the simulation demonstrating the emergence of shock waves in the explicit SPH calculations, in which a steeper temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic of the theoretical models representing the dynamics of liquid helium-4, which are closely associated with our two-fluid model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Autocorrelation function (ACF) and (b) power spectral density (PSD) of the truncation error f (2) ε (x) from SPH kernel approximation, estimated via Monte Carlo simulation for various kernel widths h ∈ {0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2}. The ACF exhibits a delta-like profile c…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A proposed view of the microscopic composition of cryogenic liquid helium-4 in a multiscale framework. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. K. Onnes, Part I. Laboratory methods of liquefaction. On the lowest temperature yet obtained, Trans. Faraday Soc. 18 (1922) 145–174. doi:10.1039/TF9221800145

    work page doi:10.1039/tf9221800145 1922

  2. [2]

    Kapitza, Viscosity of liquid helium below the λ-point, Nature 141 (3558) (1938) 74–74

    P. Kapitza, Viscosity of liquid helium below the λ-point, Nature 141 (3558) (1938) 74–74. doi:10.1038/141074a0

    doi:10.1038/141074a0 1938

  3. [3]

    London, The λ-phenomenon of liquid helium and the Bose–Einstein degeneracy, Nature 141 (3571) (1938) 643–644

    F. London, The λ-phenomenon of liquid helium and the Bose–Einstein degeneracy, Nature 141 (3571) (1938) 643–644. doi:10.1038/141643a0

    doi:10.1038/141643a0 1938

  4. [4]

    E. F. Burton, Viscosity of helium I and helium II, Nature 135 (3407) (1935) 265–265. doi:10.1038 /135265a0

    1935

  5. [5]

    J. F. Allen, A. D. Misener, Flow of liquid helium II, Nature 141 (3558) (1938) 75–75. doi:10.1038 /141075a0

    1938

  6. [6]

    Tisza, Transport phenomena in helium II, Nature 141 (3577) (1938) 913–913

    L. Tisza, Transport phenomena in helium II, Nature 141 (3577) (1938) 913–913. doi:10.1038 /141913a0

    1938

  7. [7]

    Landau, Theory of the superfluidity of helium II, Phys

    L. Landau, Theory of the superfluidity of helium II, Phys. Rev. 60 (1941) 356–358. doi:10.1103 /PhysRev.60.356

    1941

  8. [8]

    Atkins, Wave propagation and flow in liquid helium II, Adv

    K. Atkins, Wave propagation and flow in liquid helium II, Adv. Phys. 1 (2) (1952) 169–208. doi:10.1080 /00018735200101191

    1952

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    Dingle, Theories of helium II, Adv

    R. Dingle, Theories of helium II, Adv. Phys. 1 (2) (1952) 111–168. doi:10.1080 /00018735200101181

    1952

  2. [10]

    Gorter, J

    C. Gorter, J. Mellink, On the irreversible processes in liquid helium II, Physica 15 (3) (1949) 285–304. doi:10.1016 /0031-8914(49)90105-6

    1949

  3. [11]

    Feynman, Chapter II Application of quantum mechanics to liquid helium, V ol

    R. Feynman, Chapter II Application of quantum mechanics to liquid helium, V ol. 1 of Progress in Low Temperature Physics, Elsevier, 1955, pp. 17–53. doi:10.1016/S0079-6417(08)60077-3

    1955 doi

  4. [12]

    C. L. Horner, R. A. Van Gorder, Dynamics of quantized vortex filaments under a local induction approximation with second-order correction, Phys. Fluids 31 (6) (2019) 065103. doi:10.1063/1.5091567

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    H ¨anninen, A

    R. H ¨anninen, A. W. Baggaley, V ortex filament method as a tool for computational visualization of quantum turbulence, PNAS 111 (supple- ment 1) (2014) 4667–4674. doi:10.1073/pnas.1312535111

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    O. C. Idowu, D. Kivotides, C. F. Barenghi, D. C. Samuels, Numerical methods for coupled normal-fluid and superfluid flows in helium II, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001, pp. 162–176. doi:10.1007/3-540-45542-6 14

    2001 doi

  7. [15]

    A. W. Baggaley, S. Laizet, V ortex line density in counterflowing He II with laminar and turbulent normal fluid velocity profiles, Phys. Fluids 25 (11) (2013) 115101. doi:10.1063/1.4828892

    2013 doi

  8. [16]

    S. Yui, H. Kobayashi, M. Tsubota, W. Guo, Fully coupled two-fluid dynamics in superfluid 4He: Anomalous anisotropic velocity fluctuations in counterflow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 155301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.155301

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    Kojima, W

    H. Kojima, W. Veith, E. Guyon, I. Rudnick, Persistent current states in rotating superfluid helium, J. Low Temp. Phys 8 (3) (1972) 187–193. doi:10.1007/BF00655077

    1972 doi

  10. [18]

    E. J. Yarmchuk, R. E. Packard, Photographic studies of quantized vortex lines, J. Low Temp. Phys 46 (5) (1982) 479–515. doi:10.1007/BF00683912

    1982 doi

  11. [19]

    K. W. Madison, F. Chevy, V . Bretin, J. Dalibard, Stationary states of a rotating Bose–Einstein condensate: Routes to vortex nucleation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 4443–4446. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4443

    2001 doi

  12. [20]

    Tsubota, K

    M. Tsubota, K. Kasamatsu, M. Ueda, V ortex lattice formation in a rotating Bose–Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 023603. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.65.023603

    2002 doi

  13. [21]

    Kasamatsu, M

    K. Kasamatsu, M. Tsubota, M. Ueda, Nonlinear dynamics of vortex lattice formation in a rotating Bose–Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003) 033610. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.67.033610

    2003 doi

  14. [22]

    S. K. Adhikari, V ortex-lattice formation in a spin–orbit coupled rotating spin-1 condensate, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33 (6) (2020) 065404. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/abc5d7

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    W. F. Vinen, The physics of superfluid helium. doi:10.5170/CERN-2004-008.363

    2004 doi

  16. [24]

    M. L. Amigo, T. Herrera, L. Ne ˜ner, L. Peralta Gavensky, F. Turco, J. Luzuriaga, A quantitative experiment on the fountain effect in superfluid helium, Eur. J. Phys. 38 (5) (2017) 055103. doi:10.1088/1361-6404/aa818c

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    S. W. Van Sciver, C. F. Barenghi, Chapter 5 - Visualisation of quantum turbulence, in: Quantum Turbulence, V ol. 16 of Progress in Low Temperature Physics, Elsevier, 2009, pp. 247–303. doi:10.1016/S0079-6417(08)00005-X

    2009 doi

  18. [26]

    A. C. Hollis-Hallett, Experiments with a rotating cylinder viscometer in liquid helium II, Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 49 (4) (1953) 717–727. doi:10.1017/S0305004100028917

    1953 doi

  19. [27]

    S. Tsuzuki, Reproduction of vortex lattices in the simulations of rotating liquid helium-4 by numerically solving the two-fluid model using smoothed-particle hydrodynamics incorporating vortex dynamics, Phys. Fluids 33 (8) (2021) 087117. doi:10.1063/5.0060605

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    Tsuzuki, Theoretical framework bridging classical and quantum mechanics for the dynamics of cryogenic liquid helium-4 using smoothed- particle hydrodynamics, Phys

    S. Tsuzuki, Theoretical framework bridging classical and quantum mechanics for the dynamics of cryogenic liquid helium-4 using smoothed- particle hydrodynamics, Phys. Fluids 34 (12) (2022) 127116. doi:10.1063/5.0122247

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    Tsuzuki, A hydrodynamic approach to reproduce multiple spinning vortices in horizontally rotating three-dimensional liquid helium-4, Phys

    S. Tsuzuki, A hydrodynamic approach to reproduce multiple spinning vortices in horizontally rotating three-dimensional liquid helium-4, Phys. Fluids 36 (8) (2024) 087155. doi:10.1063/5.0218444

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Tsuzuki, Particle approximation of the two-fluid model for superfluid 4He using smoothed particle hydrodynamics, J

    S. Tsuzuki, Particle approximation of the two-fluid model for superfluid 4He using smoothed particle hydrodynamics, J. Phys. Commun. 5 (3) (2021) 035001. doi:10.1088/2399-6528/abe7c7

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    R. A. Gingold, J. Monaghan, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars, MNRAS 181 (3) (1977) 375–389. doi:10.1093/mnras/181.3.375

    1977 doi

  24. [32]

    Monaghan, J

    J. Monaghan, J. Lattanzio, A refined particle method for astrophysical problems, Astron. Astrophys. 149 (1) (1985) 135–143. URL https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/1985A\%26A...149..135M

    1985

  25. [33]

    Monaghan, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Ann

    J. Monaghan, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 30 (1) (1992) 543–574. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551

    1992

  26. [34]

    Monaghan, Simulating free surface flows with SPH, J

    J. Monaghan, Simulating free surface flows with SPH, J. Comput. Phys. 110 (2) (1994) 399–406. doi:10.1006 /jcph.1994.1034

    1994

  27. [35]

    Monaghan, A

    J. Monaghan, A. Kocharyan, SPH simulation of multi-phase flow, Comput. Phys. Commun. 87 (1) (1995) 225 – 235. doi:10.1016 /0010- 4655(94)00174-Z. 20

    1995

  28. [36]

    Morris, J

    J. Morris, J. Monaghan, A switch to reduce SPH viscosity, J. Comput. Phys. 136 (1) (1997) 41–50. doi:10.1006 /jcph.1997.5690

    1997

  29. [37]

    Monaghan, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Rep

    J. Monaghan, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Rep. Prog. Phys 68 (8) (2005) 1703–1759. doi:10.1088 /0034-4885/68/8/r01

    2005

  30. [38]

    D. W. Condi ff, J. S. Dahler, Fluid mechanical aspects of antisymmetric stress, Phys. Fluids 7 (6) (1964) 842–854. doi:10.1063/1.1711295

    1964 doi

  31. [39]

    M ¨uller, D

    K. M ¨uller, D. A. Fedosov, G. Gompper, Smoothed dissipative particle dynamics with angular momentum conservation, J. Comput. Phys. 281 (2015) 301 – 315. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.10.017

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    K. W. Schwarz, Three-dimensional vortex dynamics in superfluid 4He: Line-line and line-boundary interactions, Phys. Rev. B 31 (1985) 5782–5804. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.31.5782

    1985 doi

  33. [41]

    K. W. Schwarz, Three-dimensional vortex dynamics in superfluid 4He: Homogeneous superfluid turbulence, Phys. Rev. B 38 (1988) 2398–

    1988

  34. [42]

    Marakov, J

    A. Marakov, J. Gao, W. Guo, S. W. Van Sciver, G. G. Ihas, D. N. McKinsey, W. F. Vinen, Visualization of the normal-fluid turbulence in counterflowing superfluid 4He, Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015) 094503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.094503

    2015 doi

  35. [43]

    Kobayashi, S

    H. Kobayashi, S. Yui, M. Tsubota, Numerical study on entrance length in thermal counterflow of superfluid 4He, J. Low Temp. Phys. 196 (1) (2019) 35–41. doi:10.1007/s10909-019-02169-8

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    Xu, X.-L

    X. Xu, X.-L. Deng, An improved weakly compressible SPH method for simulating free surface flows of viscous and viscoelastic fluids, Comput. Phys. Commun. 201 (2016) 43 – 62. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.12.016

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    W. C. Schieve, L. P. Horwitz, Bose–Einstein ideal gas condensation, in: Quantum Statistical Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 141–158. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511626555

    2009 doi

  38. [46]

    J. M. Ziman, M. H. L. Pryce, Quantum hydrodynamics and the theory of liquid helium, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 219 (1137) (1953) 257–270. doi:10.1098/rspa.1953.0144

    1953

  39. [47]

    Second Quantization, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2009, pp. 109–128. doi:10.1007 /978-1-4020-8763-9 6

    2009

  40. [48]

    Sch ¨onberg, A general theory of the second quantization methods, Il Nuovo Cimento (1943-1954) 10 (6) (1953) 697–744

    M. Sch ¨onberg, A general theory of the second quantization methods, Il Nuovo Cimento (1943-1954) 10 (6) (1953) 697–744. doi:10.1007/BF02773031

    1953 doi

  41. [49]

    D. P. Sankovich, Bogolyubov’s theory of superfluidity, Phys. Part. Nucl. 41 (7) (2010) 1068–1070. doi:10.1134 /S1063779610070191

    2010

  42. [50]

    E. P. Gross, Structure of a quantized vortex in boson systems, Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 20 (3) (1961) 454–477. doi:10.1007/BF02731494

    1961 doi

  43. [51]

    L. P. Pitaevskii, V ortex lines in an imperfect bose gas, Sov. Phys. JETP 13 (2) (1961) 451–454

    1961

  44. [52]

    I. M. Khalatnikov, An introduction to the theory of superfluidity, CRC Press, 2018. doi:10.1201 /9780429502897

    2018

  45. [53]

    V . F. Sears, E. C. Svensson, P. Martel, A. D. B. Woods, Neutron-scattering determination of the momentum distribution and the condensate fraction in liquid 4He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 279–282. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.279

    1982 doi

  46. [54]

    Robinson, M

    M. Robinson, M. Ramaioli, S. Luding, Fluid-article flow simulations using two-way-coupled mesoscale SPH–DEM and validation, Int. J. Multiph. Flow 59 (2014) 121 – 134. doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.11.003

    2014 doi

  47. [55]

    Y . He, A. E. Bayly, A. Hassanpour, F. Muller, K. Wu, D. Yang, A gpu-based coupled SPH-DEM method for particle-fluid flow with free surfaces, Powder Technol. 338 (2018) 548 – 562. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2018.07.043

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    Pozorski, M

    J. Pozorski, M. Olejnik, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics modelling of multiphase flows: an overview, Acta Mechanica 235 (4) (2024) 1685–1714. doi:10.1007/s00707-023-03763-4

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    J. C. Maxwell, V. Illustrations of the dynamical theory of gases.—part I. On the motions and collisions of perfectly elastic spheres, Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 19 (124) (1860) 19–32. doi:10.1080/14786446008642818

    doi

  50. [58]

    S. G. Brush, Theories of liquid viscosity., Chem. Rev. 62 (6) (1962) 513–548. doi:10.1021 /cr60220a002

    1962

  51. [59]

    J. C. Maxwell, Maxwell on molecules and gases, MIT Press, 1986. URL https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262070942/maxwell-on-molecules-and-gases/

    1986

  52. [60]

    N. D. Katopodes, Chapter 8 - Turbulent flow, in: Free-Surface Flow, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2019, pp. 566–650. doi:10.1016 /B978-0-12- 815489-2.00008-3

    2019

  53. [61]

    A. M. Steinberg, P. E. Hamlington, X. Zhao, Structure and dynamics of highly turbulent premixed combustion, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 85 (2021) 100900. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100900

    2021

  54. [62]

    R. J. Doviak, D. S. Zrni ´c, 11 - Observations of fair weather, in: Doppler Radar and Weather Observations (Second Edition), Academic Press, San Diego, 1993, pp. 424–505. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-221422-6.50016-4

    1993 doi

  55. [63]

    A. N. Kolmogorov, The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large reynolds numbers, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 434 (1991) 9–13. doi:10.1098/rspa.1991.0075

    1991

  56. [64]

    J. M. McDonough, Introductory lectures on turbulence: physics, mathematics and modeling. URL https://uknowledge.uky.edu/me_textbooks/2

  57. [65]

    J. W. Deardor ff, A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large reynolds numbers, J. Fluid. Mech. 41 (2) (1970) 453–480. doi:10.1017/S0022112070000691

    1970 doi

  58. [66]

    Leonard, Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows, in: Turbulent Di ffusion in Environmental Pollution, V ol

    A. Leonard, Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows, in: Turbulent Di ffusion in Environmental Pollution, V ol. 18 of Advances in Geophysics, Elsevier, 1975, pp. 237–248. doi:10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60464-1

    1975 doi

  59. [67]

    Reynolds, IV

    O. Reynolds, IV. On the dynamical theory of incompressible viscous fluids and the determination of the criterion, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 186 (1895) 123–164. doi:10.1098/rsta.1895.0004

  60. [68]

    Desbrun, M.-P

    M. Desbrun, M.-P. Gascuel, Smoothed particles: A new paradigm for animating highly deformable bodies, in: Computer Animation and Simulation’ 96, Springer, 1996, pp. 61–76. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-7486-9 5

    1996 doi

  61. [69]

    M ¨uller, D

    M. M ¨uller, D. Charypar, M. Gross, Particle-based fluid simulation for interactive applications, in: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIG- GRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, SCA ’03, Eurographics Association, Goslar, DEU, 2003, pp. 154–159. URL https://dl.acm.org/...

    2003

  62. [70]

    Stranex, S

    T. Stranex, S. Wheaton, A new corrective scheme for SPH, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200 (1) (2011) 392–402. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2010.09.003

    2011 doi

  63. [71]

    Gabbasov, L

    R. Gabbasov, L. D. G. Sigalotti, F. Cruz, J. Klapp, J. M. Ram ´ırez-Velasquez, Consistent SPH simulations of protostellar collapse and frag- mentation, ApJ 835 (2) (2017) 287. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5655. 21

    2017 doi

  64. [72]

    L. D. G. Sigalotti, O. Rend ´on, J. Klapp, C. A. Vargas, F. Cruz, A new insight into the consistency of the SPH interpolation formula, Appl. Math. Comput. 356 (2019) 50–73. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2019.03.018

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    Di Mascio, M

    A. Di Mascio, M. Antuono, A. Colagrossi, S. Marrone, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics method from a large eddy simulation perspective, Phys. Fluids 29 (3) (2017) 035102. doi:10.1063/1.4978274

    2017 doi

  66. [74]

    Imoto, Unique solvability and stability analysis for incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics method, Comput

    Y . Imoto, Unique solvability and stability analysis for incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics method, Comput. Part. Mech. 6 (2) (2019) 297–309. doi:10.1007/s40571-018-0214-7

    2019 doi

  67. [75]

    Imoto, Truncation error estimates of approximate operators in a generalized particle method, JJIAM 37 (2) (2020) 565–598

    Y . Imoto, Truncation error estimates of approximate operators in a generalized particle method, JJIAM 37 (2) (2020) 565–598. doi:10.1007/s13160-020-00407-1

    2020 doi

  68. [76]

    Amicarelli, J

    A. Amicarelli, J. C. Marongiu, F. Leboeuf, J. Leduc, J. Caro, SPH truncation error in estimating a 3D function, Comput. Fluids. 44 (1) (2011) 279–296. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.01.018

    2011 doi

  69. [77]

    D. S. Balsara, von Neumann stability analysis of smoothed particle hydrodynamics–suggestions for optimal algorithms, J. Comput. Phys. 121 (2) (1995) 357–372. doi:10.1016/S0021-9991(95)90221-X

    1995 doi

  70. [78]

    Swegle, D

    J. Swegle, D. Hicks, S. Attaway, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis, J. Comput. Phys. 116 (1) (1995) 123–134. doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1010

    1995

  71. [79]

    Gregory, Chapter 3 - Floc formation and floc structure, in: Interface Science in Drinking Water Treatment, V ol

    J. Gregory, Chapter 3 - Floc formation and floc structure, in: Interface Science in Drinking Water Treatment, V ol. 10 of Interface Science and Technology, Elsevier, 2006, pp. 25–43. doi:10.1016/S1573-4285(06)80072-4

    2006 doi

  72. [80]

    Okawa, H

    T. Okawa, H. Asano, K. Ito, S. Mori, H. Umekawa, R. Matsumoto, C. H. Pyeon, D. Ito, 3 - fundamentals for power engineering, in: Fundamentals of Thermal and Nuclear Power Generation, V ol. 1 of JSME Series in Thermal and Nuclear Power Generation, Elsevier, 2021, pp. 77–226. doi...

    2021 doi

  73. [81]

    W. Guo, M. L. Mantia, D. P. Lathrop, S. W. V . Sciver, Visualization of two-fluid flows of superfluid helium-4, PNAS 111 (supplement 1) (2014) 4653–4658. doi:10.1073/pnas.1312546111

    2014 doi

  74. [82]

    C. F. Barenghi, Y . A. Sergeev, A. W. Baggaley, Regimes of turbulence without an energy cascade, Sci. Rep 6 (1) (2016) 35701. doi:10.1038/srep35701

    2016 doi

  75. [83]

    Skrbek, D

    L. Skrbek, D. Schmoranzer, S. Midlik, K. R. Sreenivasan, Phenomenology of quantum turbulence in superfluid helium, PNAS 118 (16) (2021) e2018406118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2018406118

    2021 doi

  76. [84]

    Babuin, E

    S. Babuin, E. Varga, L. Skrbek, E. L ´evˆeque, P.-E. P.-E. Roche, E ffective viscosity in quantum turbulence: a steady-state approach, EPL 106 (2) (2014) 24006. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/106/24006

    2014 doi

  77. [85]

    R. G. Cooper, M. Mesgarnezhad, A. W. Baggaley, C. F. Barenghi, Knot spectrum of turbulence, Sci. Rep 9 (1) (2019) 10545. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47103-w

    2019 doi

  78. [86]

    W. F. Vinen, D. Shoenberg, Mutual friction in a heat current in liquid helium II I. Experiments on steady heat currents, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 240 (1220) (1957) 114–127. doi:10.1098/rspa.1957.0071

    1957

  79. [87]

    W. F. Vinen, D. Shoenberg, Mutual friction in a heat current in liquid helium II. II. Experiments on transient e ffects, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 240 (1220) (1957) 128–143. doi:10.1098/rspa.1957.0072

    1957

  80. [88]

    W. F. Vinen, D. Shoenberg, Mutual friction in a heat current in liquid helium II III. Theory of the mutual friction, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 242 (1231) (1957) 493–515. doi:10.1098/rspa.1957.0191

    1957

  81. [89]

    W. F. Vinen, D. Shoenberg, Mutual friction in a heat current in liquid heliumn. II. IV. Critical heat currents in wide channels, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 243 (1234) (1958) 400–413. doi:10.1098/rspa.1958.0007

    1958

  82. [90]

    R. M. Bowley, F. W. Sheard, Motion of negative ions at supercritical drift velocities in liquid4He at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. B 16 (1977) 244–254. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.16.244

    1977 doi

  83. [91]

    C. M. Muirhead, W. F. Vinen, R. J. Donnelly, The nucleation of vorticity by ions in superfluid 4He II. Theory of the effect of dissolved 3He, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 402 (1823) (1985) 225–243. doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0116

    1985

  84. [92]

    G. W. Rayfield, F. Reif, Quantized vortex rings in superfluid helium, Phys. Rev. 136 (1964) A1194–A1208. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.136.A1194

    1964 doi

  85. [93]

    G. G. Nancolas, R. M. Bowley, P. V . E. McClintock, W. F. Vinen, The breakdown of superfluidity in liquid4He. IV. Influence of 3He isotopic impurities on the nucleation of quantized vortex rings, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 313 (1527) (1985) 537–606. doi:10.1098/rsta.1985.0003

    1985

  86. [94]

    C. M. Muirhead, W. F. Vinen, R. J. Donnelly, C. M. Muirhead, W. F. Vinen, R. J. Donnelly, The nucleation of vorticity by ions in superfluid 4He I. Basic theory, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 311 (1518) (1984) 433–467. doi:10.1098/rsta.1984.0038

    1984

  87. [95]

    P. C. Hendry, N. S. Lawson, P. V . E. McClintock, C. D. H. Williams, R. M. Bowley, The breakdown of superfluidity in liquid 4He VI. Macroscopic quantum tunnelling by vortices in isotopically pure He II, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 332 (1626) (1990) 387–414. doi:10.1098/rsta....

    1990

  88. [2417]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.38.2398

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.