Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ExPerT: Effective and Explainable Evaluation of Personalized Long-Form Text Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.14956 v2 pith:VQU6E7FK submitted 2025-01-24 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.IR
keywords expertevaluationtextgenerationpersonalizedalignmentaspectsevaluating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Evaluating personalized text generated by large language models (LLMs) is challenging, as only the LLM user, i.e., prompt author, can reliably assess the output, but re-engaging the same individuals across studies is infeasible. This paper addresses the challenge of evaluating personalized text generation by introducing ExPerT, an explainable reference-based evaluation framework. ExPerT leverages an LLM to extract atomic aspects and their evidence from the generated and reference texts, match the aspects, and evaluate their alignment based on content and writing style -- two key attributes in personalized text generation. Additionally, ExPerT generates detailed, fine-grained explanations for every step of the evaluation process, enhancing transparency and interpretability. Our experiments demonstrate that ExPerT achieves a 7.2% relative improvement in alignment with human judgments compared to the state-of-the-art text generation evaluation methods. Furthermore, human evaluators rated the usability of ExPerT's explanations at 4.7 out of 5, highlighting its effectiveness in making evaluation decisions more interpretable.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SuperWriter: Reflection-Driven Long-Form Generation with Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 7B writing model trained on plan-write-refine thinking data with multi-stage preference optimization matches or beats several larger models on long-form generation benchmarks.

Pith tools