Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Investigation of Sub-configurations Reveals Stable Spin-Orbit Torque Switching Polarity in Polycrystalline Mn3Sn

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spin-orbit torque switching in polycrystalline Mn3Sn gets its stable polarity from configuration II; configuration I cancels.

desk verdict A useful simulation sweep of Mn3Sn sub-configurations that needs a citation fix and a texture caveat before its central claim is trustable. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15815 v1 pith:4C7L7Z7A submitted 2025-01-27 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Boyu Zhao , Zhengde Xu , Xue Zhang , Zhenhang Kong , Shuyuan Shi , Zhifeng Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Mn3Snspin-orbittorquenoncollinearantiferromagnetanomalousHalleffectpolycrystallineoctupolemomentKagomelatticeLLGSsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the robust spin-orbit-torque (SOT) switching seen in polycrystalline Mn3Sn comes almost entirely from one class of grain orientation: configuration II, where the Kagome plane (the plane of corner-sharing Mn triangles) is perpendicular to the spin polarization. By rotating the lattice in 1-degree increments to create 360 sub-configurations and simulating each with the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert-Slonczewski equations, the authors find that every sub-configuration of configuration II sends the magnetic octupole moment to the same +z easy-axis range $\varphi \in [-14^\circ, 46^\circ]$, so its switching polarity is stable. For configuration I, the Kagome plane parallel to the spin polarization, switching occurs only in four intervals and with opposite polarities, so under an even grain distribution those contributions cancel and add little to the measured anomalous Hall signal. If this is right, experiments on polycrystalline Mn3Sn should be interpreted through configuration II, and device design should favor grains with the Kagome plane perpendicular to the spin polarization.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the sub-configuration scan: 360 atomic environments generated by rotating the Kagome plane in 1-degree increments, meant to cover all possible grain orientations in a polycrystalline film. The simulation method is atomistic LLGS dynamics for the three Mn sublattices, with exchange, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya, anisotropy, Zeeman, and damping-like spin-orbit torque terms. The explanatory mechanism is the dynamic balance model: the stable octupole state is the vector balance of the SOT effective field $\mathbf{H}_{DL} = \boldsymbol{\sigma} \times \mathbf{m}_{oct}$, the fixed external field $\mathbf{H}_{ext}$, and the six-fold-anisotropy field $\mathbf{H}_{an} = (\mathbf{m}_{oct}\cdot \mathbf{e})\mathbf{e} - \mathbf{m}_{oct}$. The model explains both the 60-degree periodicity of the final state and why the final octupole orientation is confined to $[-14^\circ, 46^\circ]$: outside the comfortable region the required anisotropy field becomes too large, so the octupole resets to a nearby easy axis.

What would settle it

Measure the anomalous Hall switching polarity of a Mn3Sn film with a deliberately biased grain-orientation texture, or simulate a pair of coupled grains with differing sub-configurations: the model predicts configuration I contributes nothing only for an even orientation distribution, so a skewed texture or inter-grain coupling that produces a net configuration I signal would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a polycrystalline Mn3Sn/Pt bilayer the measured SOT-driven anomalous Hall switching is carried by configuration II, not configuration I. The evidence is a 1-degree rotation scan of 360 atomic environments: for configuration II every sub-configuration, under $J_c = 5\times10^{10}$ A/m² and $\mathbf{H}_{ext} = 100$ Oe along +y, reaches a final octupole orientation in the range $-14^\circ$ to $46^\circ$, all with $m_{z,\mathrm{oct}} > 0$, and reversing the current or field sends it to the opposite z sign. Configuration I, scanned the same way at its own switching condition, switches only in four angular intervals, with two switching from +z to -z and two from -z to +z, so the net contribution vanishes if those sub-configurations are evenly distributed. The paper proposes a dynamic balance model in which the equilibrium is set by the damping-like SOT field $\mathbf{H}_{DL}$, the fixed applied field $\mathbf{H}_{ext}$, and the six-fold anisotropy field $\mathbf{H}_{an}$; because one of the six easy axes always lies in a comfortable region where the required $\mathbf{H}_{an}$ is small, the octupole always relaxes into the same polarity range, giving configuration II a stable switching polarity.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 360 simulated sub-configurations cover all grain orientations in the polycrystalline film, that they are evenly distributed, and that each grain switches independently with no grain-boundary coupling; if the real distribution is biased or grains interact, the cancellation of configuration I signals may fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In polycrystalline Mn3Sn devices, the anomalous Hall signal from SOT switching should be dominated by configuration II grains, so optimizing the texture toward the Kagome-plane-perpendicular orientation should strengthen the switching signal.
  • Configuration I grains can be treated as a near-zero background in the measured anomalous Hall effect, which explains why many experiments see robust switching despite having many grain orientations.
  • Because every configuration II sub-configuration ends in the same +z range and reverses with current or field, the switching polarity is stable across essentially arbitrary in-plane crystal rotation, a useful robustness property for memory cells.
  • The 60-degree periodicity and the restricted final-state range are direct predictions of the six-fold anisotropy balance, so measurements of the final octupole orientation as a function of crystal rotation can test the model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's cancellation prediction for configuration I is conditional on an even distribution of sub-configurations; if real films have texture bias, configuration I could contribute a net anomalous Hall signal, a testable consequence the paper does not develop.
  • The simulations treat grains as independent; including grain-boundary exchange or inter-grain coupling could alter the cancellation and the stability range, especially for small grains.
  • The dynamic balance model should transfer to other six-fold-symmetric noncollinear antiferromagnets such as Mn3Ge or Mn3Pt, predicting similar robust switching intervals for the analogous configuration II orientations.
  • A direct device-level prediction is that a Mn3Sn memory cell should tolerate plus or minus 30 degrees of in-plane crystal misalignment in configuration II without losing deterministic polarity; this could be probed with patterned single-crystal islands of controlled orientation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies SOT-driven switching in polycrystalline Mn3Sn by constructing 360 sub-configurations for each of two ideal device configurations, obtained by rotating the crystal in-plane in 1° increments. Atomistic LLGS simulations show that all configuration II sub-configurations switch the octupole moment to a narrow +z easy-axis range (φFinal ∈ [−14°, 46°]), giving a stable switching polarity, while configuration I sub-configurations switch in opposite directions and are claimed to cancel when evenly distributed. The authors propose a 'dynamic balance model' based on the six-fold anisotropy of Mn3Sn to explain the six-period behavior, and compare their results with experiments to conclude that configuration II contributes the dominant measured AHE signal.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper offers a plausible resolution of a longstanding puzzle: why polycrystalline Mn3Sn shows robust SOT switching even though the earlier three-configuration picture predicted switching mainly in configuration I. The systematic 360-orientation scan is a methodological strength, and the identification of a stable polarity interval for configuration II is a concrete, falsifiable prediction. The work also highlights the importance of grain-orientation distributions, a point often neglected in single-crystal-based models. However, the significance is tempered by two load-bearing gaps: the experimental comparison rests on a miscitation, and the cancellation in configuration I depends on an even grain-orientation distribution for which no evidence is provided. The dynamic balance model is descriptive rather than quantitative and partly presupposes the six-fold symmetry it is invoked to explain.

major comments (4)
  1. [Introduction; Results and Discussion (final paragraph)] The experimental comparison is based on incorrect citations. The Introduction states that experimental studies have demonstrated robust SOT-induced switching in polycrystalline samples and cites Refs. [7,9,17]; however, Ref. [7] (Lonsky & Hoffmann) is about skyrmion breathing modes, Ref. [9] (Roschewsky et al.) is about GdFeCo, and Ref. [17] (J. Lu et al.) is about IrMn-based perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions. The final paragraph of Results and Discussion further claims 'Ref. [17] studied SOT switching of Mn3Sn by rotating the Hall bar device,' which is not what Ref. [17] reports. This miscitation undermines the claim that the simulations explain previous experimental results. Please identify the correct experimental paper(s) (likely Refs. [22], [37], [41], or [45]) and accurately describe their findings, or revise the comparative claim.
  2. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 5(b) and Fig. 2(a)] The central conclusion that configuration I contributes negligibly to the measured AHE relies on the assumption that the sub-configurations are 'evenly distributed' in the polycrystalline film. This condition is stated only parenthetically in the discussion of Fig. 5(b), and no experimental texture data, grain-size distribution, or statistical argument is provided to justify it. Moreover, the text in Fig. 2(a) asserts that the 360 sub-configurations 'cover all the possible orientations' in the polycrystalline sample, but the construction only performs in-plane rotations of two ideal configurations; real grains have arbitrary tilts of the Kagome plane relative to σ and Hext, which are not sampled. If the orientation distribution is textured, or if tilted grains switch with a net polarity, the configuration I contribution need not vanish and could offset the configuration II signal. Please provide evidence for the assumed distribution, or weaken the conclusion accordingly.
  3. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 3(b)-(d)] The dynamic balance model is presented as explaining the six-period behavior and the stable switching polarity, but it is a descriptive vector sketch rather than a quantitative derivation. It postulates a six-fold easy-axis anisotropy with evenly distributed easy axes, which is the same symmetry input that already resides in the LLGS Hamiltonian (via the anisotropy term). The agreement between the model and the simulations is therefore expected by construction and does not independently validate the switching mechanism. To support the claim that the model 'perfectly explains' the variation of φDiff, the authors should provide an explicit energy or effective-field formulation that predicts φMid(φsub_conf), φFinal(φsub_conf), and the stability interval quantitatively.
  4. [Abstract; Conclusion] The abstract and conclusion state that 'the signals from various sub-configurations in configuration I cancel each other out' as a definitive result, whereas the Results section shows the cancellation holds only 'when these sub-configurations are evenly distributed.' This overstatement is load-bearing because the paper's main conclusion about the origin of the measured AHE rests on the cancellation. Please ensure the abstract and conclusion carry the same qualification as the results, or provide evidence that the distribution is indeed even.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] The symbol φ is used without definition at its first occurrence; define it as the in-plane rotation angle of the crystal lattice relative to a reference direction.
  2. [Methodology] The Hamiltonian contains a term −Σ(K_i·m_i)^2, which is the form of a uniaxial anisotropy, but the text later describes a six-fold easy-axis anisotropy in the Kagome plane; please clarify how the six-fold symmetry is encoded in the Hamiltonian or in the effective anisotropy field.
  3. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 2(a) and Fig. 4(a)] The phrase 'Noted that' appears twice; it should be 'Note that.'
  4. [Results and Discussion, Fig. 4(b)] The switching current for configuration I is Jc = 2.2×10^14 A/m², which is four orders of magnitude larger than the Jc = 5×10^10 A/m² used for configuration II; a brief comment on the practical relevance of this value for realistic devices would be helpful.
  5. [Results and Discussion] There are occasional grammar inconsistencies, e.g., 'the switching results in configuration II is insensitive' should be 'are insensitive.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central switching-polarity claims are LLGS simulation outputs, not defined by their inputs; the even-distribution premise is an untested empirical assumption, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The central claims—stable +z polarity for all configuration II sub-configurations and compensating polarities for configuration I—are outputs of LLGS simulations whose Hamiltonian, damping, and SOT parameters are taken from the literature ([18,37,41]) and are not fitted to the target AHE result. The only self-citation ([43]) is used to choose a switching condition and to identify a subset of sub-configurations; the paper explicitly reproduces those prior results in Figs. 2(c,d), so the citation is not load-bearing. The configuration I cancellation is not defined into the simulation: it is explicitly conditional on the stated assumption 'when these sub-configurations are evenly distributed' (Results, discussion of Fig. 5(b)), which is an untested empirical premise rather than a circular reduction. The dynamic balance model is heuristic: the sentence 'As both φFinal and φMid exhibit six periods, this motivates us to propose a theoretical model that includes the anisotropy energy, which also has six-fold easy axis' shows the model is rationalized from the simulated periodicity rather than independently derived. However, the sixfold anisotropy is already an input to the atomistic Hamiltonian, and the stable-polarity claim does not depend on the model's predictive content. The paper also asserts without proof that the constructed sub-configurations 'cover all the possible orientations that exist in the polycrystalline sample,' but this is a validity/coverage limitation, not a circular step. Overall, no prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters or physical entities; all simulation parameters are taken from previous literature. The main burden lies in the assumptions about exhaustiveness and even distribution of the sub-configurations, and the six-fold anisotropy input to the dynamic balance model.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The macrospin LLGS model with three Mn sublattice moments per layer captures the SOT-driven octupole dynamics of Mn3Sn.
    Invoked in the Methodology section for the coupled LLGS equations.
  • domain assumption The material parameters (A=17.53 meV, D=0.833 meV, K=0.196 meV, alpha=0.003, theta_SH=0.06, Ms=6 mu_B/Vcell) from Refs. [18,37,41] are accurate for the studied Mn3Sn/Pt films.
    Used without sensitivity analysis in the Methodology.
  • ad hoc to paper Rotating the Kagome plane in 1-degree increments over 360 degrees produces a set of sub-configurations that covers all possible in-plane atomic orientations in the polycrystalline sample.
    The paper states this coverage without proof; grain shapes, distribution, and out-of-plane tilts are ignored.
  • ad hoc to paper The sub-configurations are evenly distributed in the polycrystalline film, so that opposing switching polarities in configuration I cancel.
    Assumed in the polarity diagram discussion of Fig. 5(b) (when these sub-configurations are evenly distributed); no microstructural evidence is provided.
  • domain assumption Mn3Sn has six-fold magnetic anisotropy with evenly distributed easy axes.
    Used in the dynamic balance model and taken from prior literature; it is the same symmetry that produces the six-period structure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigation of Sub-configurations Reveals Stable Spin-Orbit Torque Switching Polarity in Polycrystalline Mn3Sn." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4C7L7Z7A

@misc{pith2026250115815,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigation of Sub-configurations Reveals Stable Spin-Orbit Torque Switching Polarity in Polycrystalline Mn3Sn},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4C7L7Z7A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15815}
}
read the original abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated the switching of octupole moment in Mn3Sn driven by spin-orbit torque (SOT). However, they have not accounted for the polycrystalline nature of the sample when explaining the switching mechanism. In this work, we use samples with various atomic orientations to capture this polycrystalline nature. We thoroughly investigate their SOT-induced spin dynamics and demonstrate that the polycrystalline structure leads to distinct outcomes. Our findings reveal that configuration II, where the Kagome plane is perpendicular to the spin polarization, exhibits robust switching with stable polarity, whereas the signals from various sub-configurations in configuration I cancel each other out. By comparing our findings with experimental results, we pinpoint the primary sources contributing to the measured AHE signals. Additionally, we establish a dynamic balance model that incorporates the unique properties of Mn3Sn to elucidate these observations. Our study highlights the essential role of the polycrystalline nature in understanding SOT switching. By clarifying the underlying physical mechanisms, our work resolves the longstanding puzzle regarding the robust SOT switching observed in Mn3Sn.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Influence of thermal noise on the field-driven dynamics of the non-collinear antiferromagnet Mn3Sn

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Field-dependent analytical escape times and octupole relaxation times for strained Mn3Sn, validated by stochastic LLG simulations in the low-barrier regime.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [43]

    Z. Xu, X. Zhang, Y . Qiao, G. Liang, S. Shi, and Z. Zhu, Deterministic spin-orbit torque switching including the interplay between spin polarization and kagome plane in Mn3Sn, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134433 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [17]

    Lu et al., V oltage -gated spin -orbit torque switching in IrMn -based perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions, Appl

    J. Lu et al., V oltage -gated spin -orbit torque switching in IrMn -based perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions, Appl. Phys. Lett. 122, 012402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [7]

    Lonsky and A

    M. Lonsky and A. Hoffmann, Coupled skyrmion breathing modes in synthetic ferri- and antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 104403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [9]

    Roschewsky, C

    N. Roschewsky, C. -H. Lambert, and S. Salahuddin, Spin -orbit torque switching of ultralarge -thickness ferrimagnetic GdFeCo, Phys. Rev. B 96, 064406 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [22]

    H. Xie, X. Chen, Q. Zhang, Z. Mu, X. Zhang, B. Yan, and Y . Wu, Magnetization switching in polycrystalline Mn3Sn thin film induced by self-generated spin-polarized current, Nat. Commun. 13, 5744 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [37]

    Tsai et al., Electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnetic state, Nature 580, 608 (2020)

    H. Tsai et al., Electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnetic state, Nature 580, 608 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [41]

    Higo et al., Perpendicular full switching of chiral antiferromagnetic order by current, Nature 607, 474 (2022)

    T. Higo et al., Perpendicular full switching of chiral antiferromagnetic order by current, Nature 607, 474 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [45]

    T. Xu, H. Bai, Y . Dong, L. Zhao, H.-A. Zhou, J. Zhang, X. -X. Zhang, and W. Jiang, Robust spin torque switching of noncollinear antiferromagnet Mn3Sn, APL Mater. 11, 071116 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 54 references
  1. [1]

    Zhang, Z

    X. Zhang, Z. Xu, and Z. Zhu, Revisiting the analytical solution of spin -orbit torque switched nanoscale perpendicular ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, 184428 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Zhu and A

    J.-G. Zhu and A. Shadman, Resonant Spin-Transfer Torque Magnetoresistive Memory, IEEE Trans. Magn. 55, 1 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    Zhang et al., Bipolar Electric -Field Switching of Perpendicular Magnetic Tunnel Junctions through V oltage-Controlled Exchange Coupling, Nano Lett

    D. Zhang et al., Bipolar Electric -Field Switching of Perpendicular Magnetic Tunnel Junctions through V oltage-Controlled Exchange Coupling, Nano Lett. 22, 622 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    A. K. Biswas, H. Ahmad, J. Atulasimha, and S. Bandyopadhyay, Experimental Demonstration of Complete 180° Reversal of Magnetization in Isolated Co Nanomagnets on a PMN –PT Substrate with V oltage Generated Strain, Nano Lett. 17, 3478 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    L. Liu, O. J. Lee, T. J. Gudmundsen, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Current -Induced Switching of Perpendicularly Magnetized Magnetic Layers Using Spin Torque from the Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 096602 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    C.-F. Pai, L. Liu, Y . Li, H. W. Tseng, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Spin transfer torque devices utilizing the giant spin Hall effect of tungsten, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 122404 (2012)

    2012

  7. [8]

    M. G. Morshed, K. H. Khoo, Y . Quessab, J.-W. Xu, R. Laskowski, P. V . Balachandran, A. D. Kent, and A. W. Ghosh, Tuning Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in ferrimagnetic GdCo: A first-principles approach, Phys. Rev. B 103, 174414 (2021)

    2021

  8. [10]

    Z. Xu, J. Ren, Z. Yuan, Y . Xin, X. Zhang, S. Shi, Y . Yang, and Z. Zhu, Field-free spin–orbit torque switching of an antiferromagnet with perpendicular Néel vector, J. Appl. Phys. 133, 153904 (2023)

    2023

  9. [11]

    Y . Qiao, Z. Xu, Z. Xu, Y . Yang, and Z. Zhu, Orthogonal spin–orbit torque-induced deterministic switching in NiO, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, 182403 (2024)

    2024

  10. [12]

    E. A. Tremsina and G. S. D. Beach, Atomistic simulations of distortion -limited high-speed dynamics of antiferromagnetic skyrmions, Phys. Rev. B 106, L220402 (2022)

    2022

  11. [13]

    Schmitt et al., Identification of Néel Vector Orientation in Antiferromagnetic Domains Switched by Currents in Ni O / Pt Thin Films, Phys

    C. Schmitt et al., Identification of Néel Vector Orientation in Antiferromagnetic Domains Switched by Currents in Ni O / Pt Thin Films, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 034047 (2021)

    2021

  12. [14]

    Y . M. Hung, Y . Shiota, S. Yamada, M. Ohta, T. Shibata, T. Sasaki, R. Hisatomi, T. Moriyama, and T. Ono, Positive correlation between interlayer exchange coupling and the driving current of domain wall motion in a synthetic antiferromagnet, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 032407 (2021)

    2021

  13. [15]

    Shao and E

    D.-F. Shao and E. Y . Tsymbal, Antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions for spintronics, Npj Spintron. 2, 13 (2024)

    2024

  14. [16]

    Chen et al., Control of spin current and antiferromagnetic moments via topological surface state, Nat

    X. Chen et al., Control of spin current and antiferromagnetic moments via topological surface state, Nat. Electron. 5, 574 (2022)

    2022

  15. [18]

    Nagamiya, S

    T. Nagamiya, S. Tomiyoshi, and Y . Yamaguchi, Triangular spin configuration and weak ferromagnetism of Mn3Sn and Mn3Ge, Solid State Commun. 42, 385 (1982)

    1982

  16. [19]

    T. F. Duan, W. J. Ren, W. L. Liu, S. J. Li, W. Liu, and Z. D. Zhang, Magnetic anisotropy of single-crystalline Mn3Sn in triangular and helix-phase states, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 082403 (2015)

    2015

  17. [20]

    Y . Deng, X. Liu, Y . Chen, Z. Du, N. Jiang, C. Shen, E. Zhang, H. Zheng, H.-Z. Lu, and K. Wang, All - electrical switching of a topological non -collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Natl. Sci. Rev. 10, nwac154 (2023)

    2023

  18. [21]

    Shi et al., Electrically Controlled All‐Antiferromagnetic Tunnel Junctions on Silicon with Large Room‐ Temperature Magnetoresistance, Adv

    J. Shi et al., Electrically Controlled All‐Antiferromagnetic Tunnel Junctions on Silicon with Large Room‐ Temperature Magnetoresistance, Adv. Mater. 36, 2312008 (2024)

    2024

  19. [23]

    D. P. Goli and S. K. Kim, Terahertz Magnon Excitations and Switching in Non-Collinear Antiferromagnets, arXiv:2501.01150

    arXiv

  20. [24]

    Nakatsuji, N

    S. Nakatsuji, N. Kiyohara, and T. Higo, Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature, Nature 527, 212 (2015)

    2015

  21. [25]

    S. Hu, C. Zheng, W. Fan, and Y . Liu, Terahertz magnetic excitations in non -collinear antiferromagnetic Mn3Pt: Atomistic-scale dynamical simulations, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 588, 171393 (2023)

    2023

  22. [26]

    Haldar and A

    A. Haldar and A. O. Adeyeye, Microwave assisted gating of spin wave propagation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 162403 (2020)

    2020

  23. [27]

    Kim et al., Fast domain wall motion in the vicinity of the angular momentum compensation temperature of ferrimagnets, Nat

    K.-J. Kim et al., Fast domain wall motion in the vicinity of the angular momentum compensation temperature of ferrimagnets, Nat. Mater. 16, 1187 (2017)

    2017

  24. [28]

    Wu et al., Current-driven fast magnetic octupole domain-wall motion in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Nat

    M. Wu et al., Current-driven fast magnetic octupole domain-wall motion in noncollinear antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 15, 4305 (2024)

    2024

  25. [29]

    Isshiki, N

    H. Isshiki, N. Budai, A. Kobayashi, R. Uesugi, T. Higo, S. Nakatsuji, and Y . Otani, Observation of Cluster Magnetic Octupole Domains in the Antiferromagnetic Weyl Semimetal Mn3Sn Nanowire, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 216702 (2024)

    2024

  26. [30]

    Romera et al., V owel recognition with four coupled spin-torque nano-oscillators, Nature 563, 230 (2018)

    M. Romera et al., V owel recognition with four coupled spin-torque nano-oscillators, Nature 563, 230 (2018)

    2018

  27. [31]

    K. Y . Camsari, R. Faria, B. M. Sutton, and S. Datta, Stochastic p -Bits for Invertible Logic, Phys. Rev. X 7, 031014 (2017)

    2017

  28. [32]

    Niu et al., A self -learning magnetic Hopfield neural network with intrinsic gradient descent adaption, Proc

    C. Niu et al., A self -learning magnetic Hopfield neural network with intrinsic gradient descent adaption, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2416294121 (2024)

    2024

  29. [33]

    S. Luo, N. Xu, Z. Guo, Y . Zhang, J. Hong, and L. You, V oltage-Controlled Skyrmion Memristor for Energy- Efficient Synapse Applications, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 40, 635 (2019)

    2019

  30. [34]

    Li et al., Restricted Boltzmann Machines Implemented by Spin–Orbit Torque Magnetic Tunnel Junctions, Nano Lett

    X. Li et al., Restricted Boltzmann Machines Implemented by Spin–Orbit Torque Magnetic Tunnel Junctions, Nano Lett. 24, 5420 (2024)

    2024

  31. [35]

    G. K. Krishnaswamy, G. Sala, B. Jacot, C. -H. Lambert, R. Schlitz, M. D. Rossell, P. Nöel, and P. Gambardella, Time-Dependent Multistate Switching of Topological Antiferromagnetic Order in Mn 3Sn, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024064 (2022)

    2022

  32. [36]

    Zheng et al., Effective electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnet by orbital torques, Nat

    Z. Zheng et al., Effective electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnet by orbital torques, Nat. Commun. 15, 745 (2024)

    2024

  33. [38]

    Zhao, P.-B

    D.-Y . Zhao, P.-B. He, and M. -Q. Cai, Terahertz oscillation in a noncollinear antiferromagnet under spin - orbit torques, Phys. Rev. B 104, 214423 (2021)

    2021

  34. [39]

    Shukla and S

    A. Shukla and S. Rakheja, Spin -Torque-Driven Terahertz Auto -Oscillations in Noncollinear Coplanar Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034037 (2022)

    2022

  35. [40]

    Pal et al., Setting of the magnetic structure of chiral kagome antiferromagnets by a seeded spin -orbit torque, Sci

    B. Pal et al., Setting of the magnetic structure of chiral kagome antiferromagnets by a seeded spin -orbit torque, Sci. Adv. 8, eabo5930 (2022)

    2022

  36. [42]

    Yoon et al., Handedness anomaly in a non-collinear antiferromagnet under spin –orbit torque, Nat

    J.-Y . Yoon et al., Handedness anomaly in a non-collinear antiferromagnet under spin –orbit torque, Nat. Mater. 22, 1106 (2023)

    2023

  37. [44]

    Shukla, S

    A. Shukla, S. Qian, and S. Rakheja, Impact of strain on the SOT -driven dynamics of thin film Mn3Sn, J. Appl. Phys. 135, 123903 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Polley, A

    D. Polley, A. Pattabi, A. Rastogi, K. Jhuria, E. Diaz, H. Singh, A. Lemaitre, M. Hehn, J. Gorchon, and J. Bokor, Picosecond spin-orbit torque–induced coherent magnetization switching in a ferromagnet, Sci. Adv. 9, eadh5562 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Zhang et al., Room temperature field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization through spin -orbit torque originating from low-symmetry type II Weyl semimetal, Sci

    Y . Zhang et al., Room temperature field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization through spin -orbit torque originating from low-symmetry type II Weyl semimetal, Sci. Adv. 9, eadg9819 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Guo et al., Controllable conical magnetic structure and spin-orbit-torque switching in symmetry-broken ferrimagnetic films, Phys

    Y . Guo et al., Controllable conical magnetic structure and spin-orbit-torque switching in symmetry-broken ferrimagnetic films, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 014045 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Zhu and D

    L. Zhu and D. C. Ralph, Strong variation of spin -orbit torques with relative spin relaxation rates in ferrimagnets, Nat. Commun. 14, 1778 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    F. Liu, T. Huang, L. Hai, Z. Shi, X. Qiu, S. M. Zhou, and W. Fan, Effects of asymmetric Dzyaloshinskii - Moriya interaction on non-collinear antiferromagnetic spin chiral switching, SPIN (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    S. D. Pollard, J. A. Garlow, K.-W. Kim, S. Cheng, K. Cai, Y . Zhu, and H. Yang, Bloch Chirality Induced by an Interlayer Dzyaloshinskii -Moriya Interaction in Ferromagnetic Multilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 227203 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    Zhang, B

    X. Zhang, B. Cai, J. Ren, Z. Yuan, Z. Xu, Y . Yang, G. Liang, and Z. Zhu, Spatially nonuniform oscillations in ferrimagnets based on an atomistic model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 184419 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    R. F. L. Evans, W. J. Fan, P. Chureemart, T. A. Ostler, M. O. A. Ellis, and R. W. Chantrell, Atomistic spin model simulations of magnetic nanomaterials, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26, 103202 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    E. C. Stoner and E. P. Wohlfarth, A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys, IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 3475 (1991)

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.