Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Cross-Chain Arbitrage: The Next Frontier of MEV in Decentralized Finance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.17335 v2 pith:EI67LUHF submitted 2025-01-28 cs.CR cs.CE

classification cs.CRcs.CE
keywords arbitragecross-chainvolumedecentralizedpricetradesacrossactivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Decentralized finance (DeFi) markets spread across Layer-1 (L1) and Layer-2 (L2) blockchains rely on arbitrage to keep prices aligned. Today most price gaps are closed against centralized exchanges (CEXes), whose deep liquidity and fast execution make them the primary venue for price discovery. As trading volume migrates on-chain, cross-chain arbitrage between decentralized exchanges (DEXes) will become the canonical mechanism for price alignment. Yet, despite its importance to DeFi-and the on-chain transparency making real activity tractable in a way CEX-to-DEX arbitrage is not-existing research remains confined to conceptual overviews and hypothetical opportunity analyses. We study cross-chain arbitrage with a profit-cost model and a year-long measurement. The model shows that opportunity frequency, bridging time, and token depreciation determine whether inventory- or bridge-based execution is more profitable. Empirically, we analyze one year of transactions (September 2023 - August 2024) across nine blockchains and identify 242,535 executed arbitrages totaling 868.64 million USD volume. Activity clusters on Ethereum-centric L1-L2 pairs, grows 5.5x over the study period, and surges-higher volume, more trades, lower fees-after the Dencun upgrade (March 13, 2024). Most trades use pre-positioned inventory (66.96%) and settle in 9s, whereas bridge-based arbitrages take 242s, underscoring the latency cost of today's bridges. Market concentration is high: the five largest addresses execute more than half of all trades, and one alone captures almost 40% of daily volume post-Dencun. We conclude that cross-chain arbitrage fosters vertical integration, centralizing sequencing infrastructure and economic power and thereby exacerbating censorship, liveness, and finality risks; decentralizing block building and lowering entry barriers are critical to countering these threats.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Blockspace Under Pressure: An Analysis of Spam MEV on High-Throughput Blockchains

    cs.GT 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Equilibrium spam-MEV volume on high-throughput chains is derived in closed form as a function of block capacity, minimum gas price, and fee ordering, and is tested on Base and Arbitrum data.

  2. Measuring CEX-DEX Extracted Value and Searcher Profitability: The Darkest of the MEV Dark Forest

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CEX-DEX arbitrage on Ethereum extracted an estimated 233.8M USD in 19 months, increasingly concentrated among three searchers tied to dominant block builders.

  3. Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets

    cs.CR 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Claims two forms of Polymarket arbitrage and $40 million extracted profit, but the body text provided is an unrelated plasma physics paper.

Pith tools