REVIEW 2 cited by
Machine Learning Fairness for Depression Detection using EEG Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper presents the very first attempt to evaluate machine learning fairness for depression detection using electroencephalogram (EEG) data. We conduct experiments using different deep learning architectures such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) networks across three EEG datasets: Mumtaz, MODMA and Rest. We employ five different bias mitigation strategies at the pre-, in- and post-processing stages and evaluate their effectiveness. Our experimental results show that bias exists in existing EEG datasets and algorithms for depression detection, and different bias mitigation methods address bias at different levels across different fairness measures.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Gender Fairness of Machine Learning Algorithms for Pain Detection
Across four classifiers trained on the UNBC shoulder-pain dataset, every model showed gender disparities in pain detection, with the Vision Transformer achieving the best accuracy and some fairness metrics but not all.
-
FG 2025 TrustFAA: the First Workshop on Towards Trustworthy Facial Affect Analysis: Advancing Insights of Fairness, Explainability, and Safety (TrustFAA)
TrustFAA is a proposed FG 2025 workshop on fairness, explainability, and safety in facial affect analysis; this arXiv posting is its program and call for papers, with no new research results.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.