Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in the delayed scaling scenario

Kohei Kamada; Yifan Hu

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in the delayed scaling scenario

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that metastable cosmic strings entering their scaling regime late, after inflationary dilution, can produce the pulsar-timing-array gravitational-wave background at string tensions as large as $G\mu \sim 3\times10^{-5}$…

desk verdict A useful transplant of delayed scaling to metastable strings, with a clean analytic spectrum, but the sudden-onset loop density overcounts pre-tsc loops and the high-frequency tail needs recomputation. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18380 v1 pith:EIZJ2YRV submitted 2025-01-30 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-ph

Yifan Hu , Kohei Kamada This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph

keywords gravitationalwavebackgroundmetastablecosmicstringsdelayedscalingpulsartimingarraysstringtensionLIGO-Virgo-KAGRAinflationgrandunifiedtheories

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the nanohertz gravitational-wave background recently reported by pulsar timing arrays can be explained by a network of metastable cosmic strings (string-like topological defects that later decay through monopole pair creation) even when the string tension is much larger than the value the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA nondetection normally allows, provided the network begins to scale late, after inflation has diluted the long strings. It computes the stochastic gravitational-wave spectrum in this delayed scaling scenario and identifies a universal shape: a low-frequency cutoff set by the string decay time, a rise proportional to $f^2$, a plateau between roughly $10^{-6}\,\mathrm{Hz}$ and $10^{-2}\,\mathrm{Hz}$, and a high-frequency decay proportional to $f^{-1/3}$ that persists because the string thickness, rather than an artificial harmonic-mode cutoff, sets the physical cutoff. Because the high-frequency tail decays so mildly, tensions up to $G\mu \simeq 3\times10^{-5}$ can still match the pulsar-timing data while evading the LVK bounds. This matters because it widens the allowed mass scale for grand-unified-theory breaking and makes the scenario testable by future gravitational-wave observatories.

What carries the argument

The central object is the loop number density of the metastable cosmic-string network in the delayed scaling scenario: the full scaling-regime loop density, Eq. (2.6), is switched on abruptly at a redshift $z_{\rm sc}$ instead of at the usual Kibble-Zurek phase transition. The spectrum is carried by the harmonic-mode power $p_k\propto k^{-q}$ with $q=4/3$ for cusps, and the cutoff of the mode sum is set by the string thickness $\delta\sim(\mu/2\pi)^{-1/2}$ rather than by an artificial $k_{\max}$. The analytic estimates for the break frequencies $f_{\rm lc}$, $f_{\rm low}$, and $f_{\rm sc}$ then show that the plateau height and the $f^{-1/3}$ tail encode the string tension, the onset redshift $z_{\rm sc}$, and the string decay redshift $z_s$.

What would settle it

A measurement of the stochastic background by LISA, Taiji, or TianQin in the millihertz band that shows a spectral shape inconsistent with the predicted plateau-to-$f^{-1/3}$ break, or a high-frequency detection by LVK showing an $f^{-1}$ tail instead of the continued $f^{-1/3}$ decay, would exclude this delayed-scaling interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that a delayed onset of scaling, with $z_{\rm sc}\lesssim10^{14}$, converts the usual metastable-cosmic-string bound into a much weaker one: string tensions $G\mu > 10^{-6}$ can explain the PTA observations while the $f^{-1/3}$ high-frequency tail remains below the LVK constraint at roughly 25 Hz. The spectrum is governed by three characteristic frequencies: $f_{\rm lc}$, below which loop contributions are cut off by the finite string decay time; $f_{\rm low}$, where the spectrum reaches its plateau; and $f_{\rm sc}$, where the dilution of loops produced near the onset of scaling becomes important and the plateau turns into $f^{-1/3}$ decay. The paper further claims that this $f^{-1/3}$ tail is physical up to very high frequencies, because the natural upper limit on the harmonic mode number is set by the string thickness, $k_{\max}\sim l/(2\delta)$, not by an artificial cutoff. The upper bound $G\mu\simeq3\times10^{-5}$ follows from requiring the low-frequency cutoff to lie below the PTA band, and the paper finds it unchanged from the standard metastable-string case.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the network enters the scaling regime abruptly at one redshift $z_{\rm sc}$; if the onset is gradual over several e-folds, the spectral break $f_{\rm sc}$ and the derived bounds, including $G\mu\lesssim3\times10^{-5}$, will shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

String tensions up to $G\mu \simeq 3\times10^{-5}$ remain viable for explaining the PTA signal, roughly two orders of magnitude above the tension allowed in the standard thermal Kibble-Zurek scenario.
The spectral break from the plateau to $f^{-1/3}$ decay sits between about $10^{-6}$ Hz and $10^{-2}$ Hz for the viable parameters, placing a distinctive signature in the band of future space-based gravitational-wave observatories.
Measuring the plateau and the break determines both the string tension and the redshift $z_{\rm sc}$ at which scaling began, and hence the number of e-folds of inflation after the string-forming symmetry breaking.
The same scenario naturally dilutes monopoles during inflation, so the otherwise problematic monopole-forming transition just before string formation does not spoil the network.
The qualitative spectrum is insensitive to the artificial harmonic-mode cutoff: the true high-frequency cutoff is set by string thickness, so the $f^{-1/3}$ tail extends far beyond any current or planned detector band.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: if the scaling onset is gradual rather than abrupt, the spectral break $f_{\rm sc}$ would be broadened and the tensions and onset redshifts inferred from a future detection would shift; a velocity-dependent one-scale treatment would sharpen the bounds given here.
Beyond the paper: the predicted $f^{-1/3}$ tail implies that LVK stochastic background searches should not assume a high-frequency $f^{-1}$ cutoff; a null result at roughly 100 Hz would constrain the delayed-scaling parameter region differently than the paper's stated $G\mu\simeq3\times10^{-5}$ cap.
Beyond the paper: if the delayed-scaling interpretation is correct, the PTA signal no longer pins the string scale to $10^{-8}\lesssim G\mu\lesssim10^{-5}$, shifting preferred grand-unified-theory breaking scales upward and changing expectations for proton decay and monopole searches.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper does a useful thing: it takes the delayed-scaling scenario that was developed for stable strings and works out what it does to the stochastic GW background from metastable strings. The analytic decomposition of the spectrum into an f^2 rise, a plateau, and an f^-1/3 tail is clean, and the numerics confirm it (Fig. 1). The authors also check that the Gµ ≲ 3e-5 upper bound survives in this scenario, which is not obvious because the tail decays slowly. That is a genuine result, and the paper is candid about the modeling choices.

The soft spot is the onset modeling, and the stress-test note lands. Section 2.3 says the loop number density is given by Eq. (2.6) from a time tsc, but Eq. (2.6) is the full radiation-era BOS density. It contains loops whose production time is earlier than the emission time, in some cases much earlier. For small loops, t_prod ≈ (ΓGµ/α) t, which for their standard parameters is around 5×10^-3 t. Thus for emission redshifts just below zsc, the small loops contributing to the high-frequency f^-1/3 tail were born before tsc and should not exist in a delayed-scaling network. The integration in Eq. (3.6) cuts the emission time, not the production time. Since the f^-1/3 tail is dominated by emission near zsc, the high-frequency part of the spectrum is likely overcounted.

How much does this matter? The paper's central qualitative point—delayed scaling lets Gµ > 1e-6 survive the LVK bound—is probably not overturned, because removing the spurious loops makes the high-frequency signal even smaller and thus easier to hide from LVK. But the plotted spectra, the LVK 'merely satisfied' curves, and the projections for LISA/Taiji/DECIGO are all conditional on the overcounted tail. Those quantitative predictions need recomputation with a production-time cutoff (one can do this straightforwardly in the BOS approach). The paper's own disclaimer in Sec. 5 does not neutralize this; the numerical results in the body use the overcounted density.

I would not call this a fatal flaw. It is a fixable modeling issue, and the authors have flagged the right direction. But the current numbers should not be taken at face value. For a reader working on cosmic string GW spectra, the paper is worth reading for its analytic framework and for the delayed-scaling-to-metastable-string connection. I would cite it for the idea and the spectral shape, not for the current bounds. Send it to a serious referee; the referee should ask for the production-time-corrected densities before publication.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies the stochastic gravitational-wave background (GWB) from a network of metastable cosmic strings in a 'delayed scaling' scenario, in which the string network enters the scaling regime at a redshift z_sc much later than its formation during inflation. The authors use the Blanco-Pillado-Olum-Shlaer (BOS) loop number density (Eq. (2.6)) from t_sc onward, together with the standard metastable-string decay prescription, and integrate the GW emission over the radiation era. They derive analytic approximations for the spectrum: an f^2 rise from a low-frequency cutoff f_lc, a plateau between f_low and f_sc, and an f^{-1/3} decay at higher frequencies that persists to very high frequencies if the harmonic cutoff is set by the string thickness (Sec. 3.1). They show in Fig. 3 parameter choices (Gmu, sqrt(kappa), z_sc) that match PTA observations while staying below the LVK upper limit, allowing Gmu > 10^-6 and extending the upper bound to Gmu ~ 3 x 10^-5, and they discuss an inflationary model that can realize z_sc ~ 2 x 10^13.

Significance. If the quantitative results survive a more careful treatment of the delayed-scaling onset, the paper would establish that metastable cosmic strings with relatively large tension can explain the PTA signal while evading LVK constraints, with concrete predictions for LISA, Taiji, TianQin, DECIGO, and BBO. The analytic fits are cross-checked against numerical integration (Fig. 1), the parameter scans in Fig. 3 explicitly exhibit spectra that satisfy the existing bounds, and the use of external simulation-based loop densities and decay rates is transparent. The main caveat is that all of the quantitative claims rely on an abrupt switch-on of the equilibrium loop density at t_sc, an approximation whose consequences are not quantified and which affects the high-frequency tail used for the LVK constraint.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 2.3, Eq. (2.6); Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.15)-(3.16)] The delayed-scaling spectrum overcounts loops that would have been produced before t_sc. Eq. (2.6) is the equilibrium BOS density at time t, which includes loops produced at all earlier times; in a delayed scenario no loops exist before t_sc. For a loop of length l at time t, the production time is t'' = (l + Gamma G mu t)/(alpha + Gamma G mu), which for l << alpha t reduces to t'' ~ (Gamma G mu / alpha) t. With the adopted Gamma = 50, alpha = 0.1, and G mu = 10^-5, this is t'' ~ 5 x 10^-3 t. The high-frequency tail in Eqs. (3.15)-(3.16) is dominated by emission near z' ~ z_sc, i.e. t ~ t_sc, where these small loops would have been born at t'' < t_sc. The f^-1/3 tail used for the LVK constraint is therefore at risk of being an artifact of using the equilibrium density. The quantitative claims (G mu > 10^-6, z_sc < 10^14, G mu < 3 x 10^-5, and the Fig. 3 compatibility region) should be recomputed with a loop density built from the production rate integrated only over production times in [t_sc, t], or with a VOS-based onset model. The deferral of a precise treatment in Section 5 does not resolve this, since all plotted spectra and bounds use Eq. (2.6).
[Sec. 3.1, Eqs. (3.18)-(3.20)] The claim that the physical spectrum remains f^-1/3 up to f ~ 10^26 Hz is an extrapolation rather than a derivation. The argument that l > delta and lambda > delta sets a frequency-dependent initial time is plausible, but the GW power spectrum p_k proportional to k^{-4/3} is still used all the way to that cutoff, and the emission from loops with length close to the string thickness is not computed. Since the LVK-band amplitudes in Fig. 3 are obtained by extrapolating the numerical spectra beyond kmax f_sc with this f^-1/3 tail, the displayed LVK compatibility depends on this assumption. The authors should state this explicitly as a modeling assumption and, if possible, estimate how much the LVK bound changes under alternative cutoff prescriptions.
[Sec. 2.3 and Eq. (3.6)] The abrupt-onset approximation is also load-bearing for the position of f_sc and for the derived parameter bounds. The paper notes that realistic networks enter scaling over several e-folds, but the analysis fixes z_sc as a sharp lower limit of the emission integral. A gradual onset would smooth and shift the spectral break and would change the inferred (z_sc, G mu) region. I recommend adding a quantitative estimate of this shift, for example by using the VOS evolution instead of the sharp cutoff, or by giving an explicit uncertainty on z_sc.

minor comments (6)

[Sec. 2.2, after Eq. (2.5)] The phrase 'the decay rate is sufficiently law' should read 'sufficiently low'.
[Sec. 3, before Eq. (3.6)] The text says the z' integral is evaluated 'from zeq to zsc', but Eq. (3.6) contains two integrals with different ranges (ze to zs and zsc to zs); please make the integration-range convention explicit.
[Fig. 3 caption and surrounding text] The caption and the paragraph above Fig. 3 contain 'f -/13 decay' and 'f 1/3 decay'; these should read f^{-1/3}.
[Eqs. (3.13) and (3.16)] Equation (3.13) uses h = 0.68 while Eq. (3.16) uses h = 0.674; please use a single value consistently or state why the difference is not important.
[Eq. (3.16)] The bracketed expression with the two sums is typeset ambiguously; please rewrite it with clear parentheses so that the factors multiplying each sum are unambiguous.
[Sec. 4] The statement that the required small couplings can be protected against radiative corrections is not demonstrated; please add a comment on naturalness or cite a specific construction where such protection is shown.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spectrum follows from external BOS loop-density inputs and standard GW integration; the PTA/LVK consistency is openly tuned, not a disguised prediction.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. The GW spectrum in Sec. 3 is obtained by inserting the BOS metastable-loop densities, Eqs. (2.6)-(2.7), into the standard emission integral, Eq. (3.4), and integrating over redshift; the spectral breaks and slopes, Eqs. (3.7), (3.8), (3.11), (3.13), and (3.16), follow algebraically from that input, with parameters alpha, Gamma, q, and sqrt(kappa) taken from external simulations and semiclassical decay rates (Refs. [75,77,78] and [24,42,45,48]). The PTA/LVK compatibility shown in Fig. 3 is explicitly constructed: the parameters are chosen 'such that at a frequency around 10^-9 Hz < f < 10^-7 Hz the GW spectra reach the PTA measurements while at a higher frequency f ~ 10 Hz they merely satisfy the LVK constraints' (Sec. 3.2). This is fitting, but it is not disguised as a prediction, so it does not constitute a circular step under the rubric. The delayed-scaling ansatz of switching on Eq. (2.6) at t_sc (Sec. 2.3) is an unvalidated modeling assumption; the paper itself notes that 'more precise evaluation how the system enters the scaling regime' is left for future study (Sec. 5). The accompanying concern that loops produced before t_sc may be overcounted is a correctness or modeling risk, not a reduction of outputs to inputs. No load-bearing result rests on a self-citation chain: the cited delayed-scaling literature is contextual, and the NANOGrav upper bound invoked for Gmu ~ 3x10^-5 is external. Hence no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central spectrum relies on the BOS loop model, the semiclassical decay rate, and standard cosmology inputs; the only genuinely paper-specific assumptions are the sudden onset of scaling at tsc and the string-thickness estimate for the high-frequency cutoff. All parameters describing string tension, decay rate, and onset time are scanned to match PTA and LVK data rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (7)

Loop length fraction alpha = 0.1
Ratio of loop length to Hubble length at production, taken from BOS numerical simulations; enters the loop number density and spectrum shape.
GW emission efficiency Gamma = 50
Dimensionless total GW power from loops, taken from numerical simulation; controls the plateau amplitude and loop decay.
Harmonic power index q = 4/3
Power-law index for GW emission by cusps, assumed for all harmonics following Ref [22,78].
String tension Gmu = 10^-8 to 10^-4
Scanned over this range; values around 10^-5 to 10^-6 are chosen to reproduce the PTA signal while staying below LVK bounds.
Decay parameter sqrt(kappa) = sqrt(60) to sqrt(67)
Controls the metastable string decay rate and the decay redshift zs ~ 10^10; chosen to fit PTA data as in Ref [19].
Onset redshift zsc = 10^13 to 10^15
Time when delayed scaling starts; chosen so that the spectra reach PTA amplitudes and lie below LVK constraints.
Harmonic cutoff kmax = 10^4 to 10^5 in numerics
Artificial upper bound for the harmonic sum; the paper argues that string thickness moves the physical cutoff far above observational bands.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Local cosmic string networks reach a scaling regime with loop production rate proportional to t^-4 and loop sizes proportional to the Hubble length.
Standard analytic and simulation-based description of string networks, introduced in Sec 2.1.
domain assumption The loop number density follows the BOS model of Refs [75,77,78] (Eqs 2.2-2.4).
External simulation-based model; the spectrum calculation depends on this distribution.
domain assumption Metastable strings decay via monopole pair creation with rate Gamma_d = (mu/2pi) exp(-pi kappa), Eq (2.5).
Semiclassical tunneling result from Refs [24,48]; sets the string lifetime ts.
ad hoc to paper The delayed scaling network can be modeled by taking the full scaling-regime loop density to switch on abruptly at tsc (Sec 2.3).
The paper uses this sudden-onset ansatz instead of evolving the network with the VOS model; the paper acknowledges that a precise evaluation is future work.
domain assumption Matter-era loop contributions with exponential decay factors can be neglected for ts > teq.
Used in Sec 3 to restrict the redshift integral to the radiation era; justified by exponential suppression in Eq (2.8).
ad hoc to paper The physical maximum harmonic number is set by the string thickness, kmax = l/(2 delta), so the f^-1/3 decay continues to very high frequencies in the bands of interest.
Heuristic estimate in Sec 3.1 that replaces the artificial constant kmax; this preserves the f^-1/3 tail at observable frequencies.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in the delayed scaling scenario." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EIZJ2YRV

@misc{pith2026250118380,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in the delayed scaling scenario},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EIZJ2YRV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18380}
}

read the original abstract

Recent observations by pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) such as NANOGrav, EPTA, PPTA, and CPTA suggest the presence of nanohertz stochastic gravitational wave background (GWB). While such signals could be explained by gravitational waves from a network of metastable cosmic strings (CSs), standard scenarios involving the Kibble-Zurek mechanism triggered by a thermal potential face significant challenges. Specifically, these scenarios predict a GWB spectrum inconsistent with the non-detection at higher frequencies by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) for CSs with relatively large string tension. It is also difficult to prevent the monopole forming phase transition just before the CS forming symmetry breaking, which spoils the CS network formation. In contrast, a delayed scaling scenario, where the CSs start to emit GWs at a later time due to the dilution during inflation, alleviates these issues. This scenario allows for a larger string tension while monopoles are sufficiently diluted such that the CS network safely forms. In this study, we clarify the spectrum of stochastic GWB from metastable CSs in the delayed scaling scenario, consistent with the PTA observations while satisfying the LVK constraints. Furthermore, we explore its potential signatures at frequencies accessible to other detectors such as LVK as well as LISA, Taiji, and TianQin or DECIGO and BBO. We also discuss the implications on inflation and underlying UV theories, such as the grand unified theories.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Metastable cosmic strings are broken at the start
hep-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Metastable cosmic-string networks are typically broken within a Hubble time of formation by finite-temperature effects or by pre-existing monopoles, so matching NANOGrav requires m_M^2/μ ≳ 10^3.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Advanced LIGO,

LIGO ScientificCollaboration, J. Aasiet al., “Advanced LIGO,”Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 074001, arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2015
[2]

Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,

VIRGO Collaboration, F. Acerneseet al., “Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,”Class. Quant. Grav. 32 no. 2, (2015) 024001, arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc] . – 15 –

arXiv 2015
[3]

Detector configuration of KAGRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector,

KAGRA Collaboration, K. Somiya, “Detector configuration of KAGRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector,”Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 124007, arXiv:1111.7185 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2012
[4]

Interferometer design of the KAGRA gravitational wave detector,

KAGRA Collaboration, Y. Aso, Y. Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa, T. Sekiguchi, D. Tatsumi, and H. Yamamoto, “Interferometer design of the KAGRA gravitational wave detector,”Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 4, (2013) 043007,arXiv:1306.6747 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2013
[5]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,

LISA Collaboration, P. Amaro-Seoaneet al., “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

arXiv
[6]

The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,

W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, “The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,”Natl. Sci. Rev. 4 no. 5, (2017) 685–686

2017
[7]

Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources,

W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and Y.-Z. Zhang, “Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 no. 17, (2020) 2050075,arXiv:1807.09495 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2020
[8]

TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,

TianQin Collaboration, J. Luoet al., “TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav. 33 no. 3, (2016) 035010,arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

arXiv 2016

Show all 100 references

[9]

The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology,

TianQin Collaboration, J. Meiet al., “The TianQin project: current progress on science and technology,” PTEP 2021 no. 5, (2021) 05A107,arXiv:2008.10332 [gr-qc]

2021
[10]

Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space,

N. Seto, S. Kawamura, and T. Nakamura, “Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 221103, arXiv:astro-ph/0108011

2001 arXiv
[11]

Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer,

V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish, “Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer,”Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 2435–2446, arXiv:gr-qc/0512039

2006 arXiv
[12]

Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,

Planck Collaboration, Y. Akramiet al., “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10, arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

2020 arXiv
[13]

Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey,

LiteBIRD Collaboration, E. Allyset al., “Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey,”PTEP 2023 no. 4, (2023) 042F01, arXiv:2202.02773 [astro-ph.IM]

2023 arXiv
[14]

CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan,

K. Abazajian et al., “CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan,” arXiv:1907.04473 [astro-ph.IM]

1907 arXiv
[15]

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,

NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,”Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 no. 1, (2023) L8, arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[16]

The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals,

EPTA, InPTA:Collaboration, J. Antoniadiset al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals,”Astron. Astrophys. 678 (2023) A50, arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[17]

Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,

D. J. Reardonet al., “Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,”Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 no. 1, (2023) L6,arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[18]

Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,

H. Xuet al., “Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,”Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23 no. 7, (2023) 075024, arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

2023 arXiv
[19]

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,

NANOGrav Collaboration, A. Afzalet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics,”Astrophys. J. Lett. 951 no. 1, (2023) L11,arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]. [Erratum: Astrophys.J.Lett. 971, L27 (2024), Erratum: Astrophys.J. 971, L27 (2024)]

2023 arXiv
[20]

Gravitational radiation from cosmic strings,

A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational radiation from cosmic strings,”Phys. Lett. B 107 (1981) 47–50. – 16 –

1981
[21]

Gravitational interactions of cosmic strings,

C. J. Hogan and M. J. Rees, “Gravitational interactions of cosmic strings,”Nature 311 (1984) 109–113

1984
[22]

Gravitational Radiation from Cosmic Strings,

T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational Radiation from Cosmic Strings,”Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 3052

1985
[23]

The stochastic gravitational wave spectrum resulting from cosmic string evolution,

F. S. Accetta and L. M. Krauss, “The stochastic gravitational wave spectrum resulting from cosmic string evolution,”Nucl. Phys. B 319 (1989) 747–764

1989
[24]

COSMOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF MONOPOLES CONNECTED BY STRINGS,

A. Vilenkin, “COSMOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF MONOPOLES CONNECTED BY STRINGS,” Nucl. Phys. B 196 (1982) 240–258

1982
[25]

Signals of Inflationary Models with Cosmic Strings,

M. Hindmarsh, “Signals of Inflationary Models with Cosmic Strings,”Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 190 (2011) 197–228, arXiv:1106.0391 [astro-ph.CO]

2011 arXiv
[26]

The Gravitational Wave Spectrum from Cosmological B − L Breaking,

W. Buchmüller, V. Domcke, K. Kamada, and K. Schmitz, “The Gravitational Wave Spectrum from Cosmological B − L Breaking,” JCAP 10 (2013) 003, arXiv:1305.3392 [hep-ph]

2013 arXiv
[27]

Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA,

P. Auclairet al., “Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA,” JCAP 04 (2020) 034, arXiv:1909.00819 [astro-ph.CO]

2020 arXiv
[28]

Beyond the Standard Models with Cosmic Strings,

Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn, “Beyond the Standard Models with Cosmic Strings,” JCAP 07 (2020) 032, arXiv:1912.02569 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[29]

Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves and eLISA/NGO: Phase Transitions, Cosmic Strings and Other Sources,

P. Binetruy, A. Bohe, C. Caprini, and J.-F. Dufaux, “Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves and eLISA/NGO: Phase Transitions, Cosmic Strings and Other Sources,” JCAP 06 (2012) 027, arXiv:1201.0983 [gr-qc]

2012 arXiv
[30]

Full analytical approximation to the stochastic gravitational wave background generated by cosmic string networks,

L. Sousa, P. P. Avelino, and G. S. F. Guedes, “Full analytical approximation to the stochastic gravitational wave background generated by cosmic string networks,”Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 10, (2020) 103508,arXiv:2002.01079 [astro-ph.CO]

2020 arXiv
[31]

Gravitational waves from cosmic strings in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation,

LISA Cosmology Working GroupCollaboration, J. J. Blanco-Pillado, Y. Cui, S. Kuroyanagi, M. Lewicki, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, I. Y. Rybak, L. Sousa, and J. M. Wachter, “Gravitational waves from cosmic strings in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation,” arXiv:24...

arXiv
[32]

Gravitational waves from cosmic strings for pedestrians,

K. Schmitz and T. Schröder, “Gravitational waves from cosmic strings for pedestrians,” arXiv:2412.20907 [astro-ph.CO]
[33]

Vortex Line Models for Dual Strings,

H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, “Vortex Line Models for Dual Strings,”Nucl. Phys. B 61 (1973) 45–61

1973
[34]

Cosmic strings,

M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble, “Cosmic strings,”Rept. Prog. Phys. 58 (1995) 477–562, arXiv:hep-ph/9411342

1995 arXiv
[35]

Vilenkin and E

A. Vilenkin and E. P. S. Shellard,Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects. Cambridge University Press, 7, 2000

2000
[36]

Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,

T. W. B. Kibble, “Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings,”J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387–1398

1976
[37]

Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition,

T. W. B. Kibble, “Some Implications of a Cosmological Phase Transition,”Phys. Rept. 67 (1980) 183

1980
[38]

Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium?,

W. H. Zurek, “Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium?,”Nature 317 (1985) 505–508

1985
[39]

Evolution of a system of cosmic strings,

T. W. B. Kibble, “Evolution of a system of cosmic strings,”Nucl. Phys. B 252 (1985) 227. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 261, 750 (1985)]

1985
[40]

Evolution of Cosmic String Networks,

A. Albrecht and N. Turok, “Evolution of Cosmic String Networks,”Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 973–1001

1989
[41]

How generic is cosmic string formation in SUSY GUTs,

R. Jeannerot, J. Rocher, and M. Sakellariadou, “How generic is cosmic string formation in SUSY GUTs,”Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 103514, arXiv:hep-ph/0308134. – 17 –

2003 arXiv
[42]

Gravitational Waves from Broken Cosmic Strings: The Bursts and the Beads,

L. Leblond, B. Shlaer, and X. Siemens, “Gravitational Waves from Broken Cosmic Strings: The Bursts and the Beads,”Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 123519, arXiv:0903.4686 [astro-ph.CO]

2009 arXiv
[43]

Probing the scale of grand unification with gravitational waves,

W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, H. Murayama, and K. Schmitz, “Probing the scale of grand unification with gravitational waves,”Phys. Lett. B 809 (2020) 135764, arXiv:1912.03695 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[44]

From NANOGrav to LIGO with metastable cosmic strings,

W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, and K. Schmitz, “From NANOGrav to LIGO with metastable cosmic strings,” Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135914, arXiv:2009.10649 [astro-ph.CO]

2020 arXiv
[45]

Stochastic gravitational-wave background from metastable cosmic strings,

W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, and K. Schmitz, “Stochastic gravitational-wave background from metastable cosmic strings,”JCAP 12 no. 12, (2021) 006,arXiv:2107.04578 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[46]

Metastable cosmic strings,

W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, and K. Schmitz, “Metastable cosmic strings,”JCAP 11 (2023) 020, arXiv:2307.04691 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[47]

Gravitational Waves from Metastable Cosmic Strings in Supersymmetric New Inflation Model,

A. Chitose, M. Ibe, S. Neda, and S. Shirai, “Gravitational Waves from Metastable Cosmic Strings in Supersymmetric New Inflation Model,”arXiv:2411.13299 [hep-ph]

arXiv
[48]

Decay of metastable topological defects,

J. Preskill and A. Vilenkin, “Decay of metastable topological defects,”Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 2324–2342, arXiv:hep-ph/9209210

1993 arXiv
[49]

Revisiting metastable cosmic string breaking,

A. Chitose, M. Ibe, Y. Nakayama, S. Shirai, and K. Watanabe, “Revisiting metastable cosmic string breaking,” JHEP 04 (2024) 068, arXiv:2312.15662 [hep-ph]

2024 arXiv
[50]

Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run,

KAGRA, Virgo, LIGO ScientificCollaboration, R. Abbottet al., “Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 2, (2021) 022004,arXiv:2101.12130 [gr-qc]

2021
[51]

Extended Structures at Intermediate Scales in an Inflationary Cosmology,

G. Lazarides and Q. Shafi, “Extended Structures at Intermediate Scales in an Inflationary Cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B 148 (1984) 35–38

1984
[52]

Spontaneously Broken Global Symmetries and Cosmology,

Q. Shafi and A. Vilenkin, “Spontaneously Broken Global Symmetries and Cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D 29 (1984) 1870

1984
[53]

Cosmic Strings and Inflation,

E. T. Vishniac, K. A. Olive, and D. Seckel, “Cosmic Strings and Inflation,”Nucl. Phys. B 289 (1987) 717–734

1987
[54]

Generation of Density Perturbations in the Inflationary Cosmology,

L. A. Kofman and A. D. Linde, “Generation of Density Perturbations in the Inflationary Cosmology,” Nucl. Phys. B 282 (1987) 555

1987
[55]

Natural Way Out of the Conflict Between Cosmic Strings and Inflation,

J. Yokoyama, “Natural Way Out of the Conflict Between Cosmic Strings and Inflation,”Phys. Lett. B 212 (1988) 273–276

1988
[56]

INFLATION CAN SAVE COSMIC STRINGS,

J. Yokoyama, “INFLATION CAN SAVE COSMIC STRINGS,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 712

1989
[57]

Phase transitions triggered by quantum fluctuations in the inflationary universe,

M. Nagasawa and J. Yokoyama, “Phase transitions triggered by quantum fluctuations in the inflationary universe,”Nucl. Phys. B 370 (1992) 472–490

1992
[58]

Evolution of topological defects during inflation,

R. Basu and A. Vilenkin, “Evolution of topological defects during inflation,”Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7150–7153, arXiv:gr-qc/9402040

1994 arXiv
[59]

Moduli inflation with large scale structure produced by topological defects,

K. Freese, T. Gherghetta, and H. Umeda, “Moduli inflation with large scale structure produced by topological defects,”Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 6083–6087, arXiv:hep-ph/9512211

1996 arXiv
[60]

Evading the pulsar constraints on the cosmic string tension in supergravity inflation,

K. Kamada, Y. Miyamoto, and J. Yokoyama, “Evading the pulsar constraints on the cosmic string tension in supergravity inflation,”JCAP 10 (2012) 023, arXiv:1204.3237 [astro-ph.CO]

2012 arXiv
[61]

Chaotic inflation in supergravity and cosmic string production,

A. Linde, “Chaotic inflation in supergravity and cosmic string production,”Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 123503, arXiv:1303.4435 [hep-th] . – 18 –

2013 arXiv
[62]

Effects of cosmic strings with delayed scaling on CMB anisotropy,

K. Kamada, Y. Miyamoto, D. Yamauchi, and J. Yokoyama, “Effects of cosmic strings with delayed scaling on CMB anisotropy,”Phys. Rev. D 90 no. 8, (2014) 083502, arXiv:1407.2951 [astro-ph.CO]

2014 arXiv
[63]

Topological Defects from the Multiverse,

J. Zhang, J. J. Blanco-Pillado, J. Garriga, and A. Vilenkin, “Topological Defects from the Multiverse,” JCAP 05 (2015) 059, arXiv:1501.05397 [hep-th]

2015 arXiv
[64]

Large scale CMB anomalies from thawing cosmic strings,

C. Ringeval, D. Yamauchi, J. Yokoyama, and F. R. Bouchet, “Large scale CMB anomalies from thawing cosmic strings,”JCAP 02 (2016) 033, arXiv:1510.01916 [astro-ph.CO]

2016 arXiv
[65]

Signature of inflation in the stochastic gravitational wave background generated by cosmic string networks,

G. S. F. Guedes, P. P. Avelino, and L. Sousa, “Signature of inflation in the stochastic gravitational wave background generated by cosmic string networks,”Phys. Rev. D 98 no. 12, (2018) 123505, arXiv:1809.10802 [astro-ph.CO]

2018 arXiv
[66]

Gravitational Wave Bursts as Harbingers of Cosmic Strings Diluted by Inflation,

Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, and D. E. Morrissey, “Gravitational Wave Bursts as Harbingers of Cosmic Strings Diluted by Inflation,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 no. 21, (2020) 211302,arXiv:1912.08832 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[67]

Cosmological constraints on cosmic string gravitational radiation,

R. R. Caldwell and B. Allen, “Cosmological constraints on cosmic string gravitational radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 3447–3468

1992
[68]

Quantitative string evolution,

C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, “Quantitative string evolution,”Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 2535–2556, arXiv:hep-ph/9602271

1996 arXiv
[69]

Extending the velocity dependent one scale string evolution model,

C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, “Extending the velocity dependent one scale string evolution model,” Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 043514, arXiv:hep-ph/0003298

2002 arXiv
[70]

Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background generated by Cosmic String Networks: Velocity-Dependent One-Scale model versus Scale-Invariant Evolution,

L. Sousa and P. P. Avelino, “Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background generated by Cosmic String Networks: Velocity-Dependent One-Scale model versus Scale-Invariant Evolution,” Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 2, (2013) 023516,arXiv:1304.2445 [astro-ph.CO]

2013 arXiv
[71]

Stochastic gravitational wave background generated by cosmic string networks: The small-loop regime,

L. Sousa and P. P. Avelino, “Stochastic gravitational wave background generated by cosmic string networks: The small-loop regime,”Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 8, (2014) 083503, arXiv:1403.2621 [astro-ph.CO]

2014 arXiv
[72]

Fractal properties and small-scale structure of cosmic string networks,

C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, “Fractal properties and small-scale structure of cosmic string networks,”Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 043515, arXiv:astro-ph/0511792

2006 arXiv
[73]

Cosmological evolution of cosmic string loops,

C. Ringeval, M. Sakellariadou, and F. Bouchet, “Cosmological evolution of cosmic string loops,” JCAP 02 (2007) 023, arXiv:astro-ph/0511646

2007 arXiv
[74]

Cosmic string loop distribution on all length scales and at any redshift,

L. Lorenz, C. Ringeval, and M. Sakellariadou, “Cosmic string loop distribution on all length scales and at any redshift,”JCAP 10 (2010) 003, arXiv:1006.0931 [astro-ph.CO]

2010 arXiv
[75]

Large parallel cosmic string simulations: New results on loop production,

J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and B. Shlaer, “Large parallel cosmic string simulations: New results on loop production,”Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 083514, arXiv:1101.5173 [astro-ph.CO]

2011 arXiv
[76]

Constraints on cosmic string tension imposed by the limit on the stochastic gravitational wave background from the European Pulsar Timing Array,

S. A. Sanidas, R. A. Battye, and B. W. Stappers, “Constraints on cosmic string tension imposed by the limit on the stochastic gravitational wave background from the European Pulsar Timing Array,”Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 122003, arXiv:1201.2419 [astro-ph.CO]

2012 arXiv
[77]

The number of cosmic string loops,

J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and B. Shlaer, “The number of cosmic string loops,”Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 2, (2014) 023512,arXiv:1309.6637 [astro-ph.CO]

2014 arXiv
[78]

Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops,

J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, “Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops,”Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 10, (2017) 104046,arXiv:1709.02693 [astro-ph.CO]

2017 arXiv
[79]

New limits on cosmic strings from gravitational wave observation,

J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and X. Siemens, “New limits on cosmic strings from gravitational wave observation,”Phys. Lett. B 778 (2018) 392–396, arXiv:1709.02434 [astro-ph.CO]. – 19 –

2018 arXiv
[80]

Confronting SO(10) GUTs with proton decay and gravitational waves,

S. F. King, S. Pascoli, J. Turner, and Y.-L. Zhou, “Confronting SO(10) GUTs with proton decay and gravitational waves,”JHEP 10 (2021) 225, arXiv:2106.15634 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[81]

Flipped SU(5): unification, proton decay, fermion masses and gravitational waves,

S. F. King, G. K. Leontaris, and Y.-L. Zhou, “Flipped SU(5): unification, proton decay, fermion masses and gravitational waves,”JHEP 03 (2024) 006, arXiv:2311.11857 [hep-ph]

2024 arXiv
[82]

Cosmic string dynamics with friction,

A. Vilenkin, “Cosmic string dynamics with friction,”Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 1060–1062

1991
[83]

Phase transition and monopole production in supergravity inflation,

K. Kamada, K. Nakayama, and J. Yokoyama, “Phase transition and monopole production in supergravity inflation,”Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 043503, arXiv:1110.3904 [hep-ph]

2012 arXiv
[84]

Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings,

T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, “Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings,” Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 064008, arXiv:gr-qc/0104026

2001 arXiv
[85]

Gravitational Wave Bursts from Cosmic Superstrings with Y-junctions,

P. Binetruy, A. Bohe, T. Hertog, and D. A. Steer, “Gravitational Wave Bursts from Cosmic Superstrings with Y-junctions,”Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 123510, arXiv:0907.4522 [hep-th]

2009 arXiv
[86]

The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background,

D. J. Fixsen, “The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background,”Astrophysical Journal 707 no. 2, (Dec., 2009) 916–920,arXiv:0911.1955 [astro-ph.CO]

2009 arXiv
[87]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanimet al., “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] . [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

2020 arXiv
[88]

Gravitational waves from low-scale cosmic strings,

K. Schmitz and T. Schröder, “Gravitational waves from low-scale cosmic strings,”Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 6, (2024) 063549,arXiv:2405.10937 [astro-ph.CO]

2024 arXiv
[89]

Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA,

G. Janssenet al., “Gravitational wave astronomy with the SKA,”PoS AASKA14 (2015) 037, arXiv:1501.00127 [astro-ph.IM]

2015 arXiv
[90]

Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO,

S. Kawamuraet al., “Current status of space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO and B-DECIGO,” PTEP 2021 no. 5, (2021) 05A105,arXiv:2006.13545 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[91]

Laser interferometry for the big bang observer,

G. M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D. A. Shaddock, W. Folkner, and E. S. Phinney, “Laser interferometry for the big bang observer,”Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 4887–4894. [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 23, 7361 (2006)]

2006
[92]

Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors,

LIGO ScientificCollaboration, B. P. Abbottet al., “Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors,”Class. Quant. Grav. 34 no. 4, (2017) 044001, arXiv:1607.08697 [astro-ph.IM]

2017 arXiv
[93]

Pushing towards the ET sensitivity using ’conventional’ technology,

S. Hild, S. Chelkowski, and A. Freise, “Pushing towards the ET sensitivity using ’conventional’ technology,” arXiv:0810.0604 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[94]

Type-I two-Higgs-doublet model and gravitational waves from domain walls bounded by strings,

B. Fu, A. Ghoshal, S. F. King, and M. H. Rahat, “Type-I two-Higgs-doublet model and gravitational waves from domain walls bounded by strings,”JHEP 08 (2024) 237, arXiv:2404.16931 [hep-ph] . https://github.com/moinulrahat/CosmicStringGW/

2024 arXiv
[95]

Supersymmetry breaking in the early universe,

M. Dine, L. Randall, and S. D. Thomas, “Supersymmetry breaking in the early universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 398–401, arXiv:hep-ph/9503303

1995 arXiv
[96]

Baryogenesis from flat directions of the supersymmetric standard model,

M. Dine, L. Randall, and S. D. Thomas, “Baryogenesis from flat directions of the supersymmetric standard model,”Nucl. Phys. B 458 (1996) 291–326, arXiv:hep-ph/9507453

1996 arXiv
[97]

Phase Transitions in de Sitter Space,

B. Allen, “Phase Transitions in de Sitter Space,”Nucl. Phys. B 226 (1983) 228–252

1983
[98]

GRAVITATIONAL EFFECT ON EFFECTIVE POTENTIAL,

K. Ishikawa, “GRAVITATIONAL EFFECT ON EFFECTIVE POTENTIAL,”Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 2445

1983
[99]

A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99–102

1980
[100]

Inflation and the Conformal Structure of Higher Order Gravity Theories,

J. D. Barrow and S. Cotsakis, “Inflation and the Conformal Structure of Higher Order Gravity Theories,”Phys. Lett. B 214 (1988) 515–518. – 20 –

1988

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Advanced LIGO,

LIGO ScientificCollaboration, J. Aasiet al., “Advanced LIGO,”Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 074001, arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2015

[2] [2]

Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,

VIRGO Collaboration, F. Acerneseet al., “Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,”Class. Quant. Grav. 32 no. 2, (2015) 024001, arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc] . – 15 –

arXiv 2015

[3] [3]

Detector configuration of KAGRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector,

KAGRA Collaboration, K. Somiya, “Detector configuration of KAGRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector,”Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 124007, arXiv:1111.7185 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2012

[4] [4]

Interferometer design of the KAGRA gravitational wave detector,

KAGRA Collaboration, Y. Aso, Y. Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa, T. Sekiguchi, D. Tatsumi, and H. Yamamoto, “Interferometer design of the KAGRA gravitational wave detector,”Phys. Rev. D 88 no. 4, (2013) 043007,arXiv:1306.6747 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2013

[5] [5]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,

LISA Collaboration, P. Amaro-Seoaneet al., “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

arXiv

[6] [6]

The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,

W.-R. Hu and Y.-L. Wu, “The Taiji Program in Space for gravitational wave physics and the nature of gravity,”Natl. Sci. Rev. 4 no. 5, (2017) 685–686

2017

[7] [7]

Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources,

W.-H. Ruan, Z.-K. Guo, R.-G. Cai, and Y.-Z. Zhang, “Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 no. 17, (2020) 2050075,arXiv:1807.09495 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2020

[8] [8]

TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,

TianQin Collaboration, J. Luoet al., “TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav. 33 no. 3, (2016) 035010,arXiv:1512.02076 [astro-ph.IM]

arXiv 2016