REVIEW 2 cited by
Detecting Ambiguities to Guide Query Rewrite for Robust Conversations in Enterprise AI Assistants
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multi-turn conversations with an Enterprise AI Assistant can be challenging due to conversational dependencies in questions, leading to ambiguities and errors. To address this, we propose an NLU-NLG framework for ambiguity detection and resolution through reformulating query automatically and introduce a new task called "Ambiguity-guided Query Rewrite." To detect ambiguities, we develop a taxonomy based on real user conversational logs and draw insights from it to design rules and extract features for a classifier which yields superior performance in detecting ambiguous queries, outperforming LLM-based baselines. Furthermore, coupling the query rewrite module with our ambiguity detecting classifier shows that this end-to-end framework can effectively mitigate ambiguities without risking unnecessary insertions of unwanted phrases for clear queries, leading to an improvement in the overall performance of the AI Assistant. Due to its significance, this has been deployed in the real world application, namely Adobe Experience Platform AI Assistant.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Diversity is Not Ambiguity: Toward Accurate and Efficient Ambiguity Detection for Open-Domain QA
The paper defines query ambiguity as logical conflict among valid answers, builds a cascade detector (ARCHIVE) around that criterion, and reports accuracy and speed gains over diversity-based baselines.
-
Fewer Clarifications, Better Code: Benchmarking Cross-Session Personalized Ambiguity Adaptation in Coding Assistants
Twelve coding LLMs resolve injected user-specific ambiguity more often on the first turn when given same-user session history (average FT-ES +15.6 pp), though shuffled history explains part of the benefit.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.