Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Magneto-plasmonic pesponse of nickel nano-rings prepared by electroless method

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Nickel nano-rings made by a single electroless bath show visible SPR and narrow magneto-optical peaks at 512 nm and 560 nm.

desk verdict The electroless nanoring fabrication is a genuine process contribution, but the 'superior sensitivity' claim rests on an FOM whose numerator was never measured. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00635 v1 pith:YF6DF2TM submitted 2025-02-02 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics

Akram Poursharif , Peyman Sahebsara , Seyyed Mahmood Monirvaghefi , Seyedeh Mehri Hamidi Mahshid Kharaziha , Masih Bagheri This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics
keywords magneto-plasmonicsnickelnano-ringselectrolessdepositionnanospherelithographysurfaceplasmonresonancemagneto-opticalKerreffectellipsometrynickel-boron-silvercoating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that nickel-silver-boron nano-rings of 200–600 nm, formed by masking indium tin oxide (ITO) with silica nanospheres and filling the ring-shaped openings from an electroless bath, can act as magneto-plasmonic sensors without any vacuum-based fabrication. In p-polarized light at 44.96° incidence, the reflected intensity shows a surface-plasmon-resonance dip between about 470 nm and 614 nm, which the authors say is absent for the equivalent thin film. They then use ellipsometric parameters (Ψ and Δ) and the longitudinal magneto-optical Kerr effect, where a magnetic field rotates the polarization of reflected light, to expose sharper spectral features; the magneto-optical rotation shows a dip near 512 nm with a full width at half maximum of about 3.35 nm and a narrow effective-rotation peak near 560 nm. The paper takes those narrow lines to mean higher detection sensitivity than conventional SPR or ellipsometry-based SPR, and finite-element simulations show a dipolar electric-field enhancement at 560 nm under a 40 mT field. If the claim holds, magneto-plasmonic sensor chips could be produced in a simple wet-chemical process rather than by lithography and sputtering.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the nano-ring itself: a nickel-silver-boron ring with roughly 100 nm inner radius, 200 nm outer radius, and 90 nm height, arrayed with about 400 nm period on an ITO substrate. It works as a plasmonic antenna whose localized surface plasmon couples to magnetization through the off-diagonal terms of the polarizability tensor and of the longitudinal-Kerr dielectric tensor; this coupling is what converts a magnetic field into a wavelength-dependent rotation of reflected light. To isolate the rings' contribution from the substrate and film background, the paper defines effective quantities $\Delta_{\rm eff}$, $\Psi_{\rm eff}$, and $Rot_{\rm eff}$, each obtained by subtracting the thin-film spectrum from the nano-ring spectrum, and it measures sharpness by FWHM through $\mathrm{FOM} = \Delta s / \mathrm{FWHM}$.

What would settle it

Immerse the nano-ring chip in liquids of increasing refractive index (air, water, ethanol, glycerol) and record the reflection and 40 mT MOKE spectra at incidence angles from 30° to 70°. If the 470–614 nm dip and the 512 nm and 560 nm features shift smoothly to longer wavelengths with refractive index, the plasmon interpretation is supported; if they stay fixed or follow the diffraction condition for a 400 nm lattice, they are more likely grating or lattice anomalies.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claimed is that the ring shape turns a weak plasmonic response in nickel into narrow, usable sensor signatures when read through the right optical channels. In the absence of a magnetic field, the p-polarized reflection at 44.96° has a broad dip in the 470–614 nm range; the authors interpret this as a surface plasmon resonance of the nickel nano-ring array. Subtracting the thin-film response defines effective spectra $\Delta_{\rm eff}$, $\Psi_{\rm eff}$, and $Rot_{\rm eff}$, which sharpen the features; applying a 40 mT magnetic field in the longitudinal Kerr configuration then gives a rotation dip near 512.5 nm and an effective-rotation peak near 560 nm with a better FWHM than either the reflection dip or the ellipsometric extrema. The authors conclude that the magneto-optical channel, followed by the ellipsometric channel, offers a better figure of merit for sensing than the ordinary SPR dip, and they support the assignment with a simulated dipolar field pattern at 560 nm.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the reflection dip near 45°, the effective ellipsometric extrema, and the MOKE features near 512 nm and 560 nm are genuine localized surface plasmon resonances of the nano-rings, rather than thin-film interference, grating diffraction, or lattice Wood–Rayleigh anomalies from the periodic array; no angular dispersion relation or refractive-index scan is provided to distinguish these possibilities.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A p-polarized reflection dip in the 470–614 nm window at about 45° can serve as a practical SPR readout for electroless Ni-Ag-B nano-rings.
  • Ellipsometric Ψ and Δ spectra, and especially the film-subtracted effective quantities, expose sharp extrema where the raw reflection is broad, giving a more sensitive readout channel on the same chip.
  • Longitudinal MOKE rotation at 40 mT gives the narrowest features, with a FWHM near 3.35 nm at roughly 512 nm and a sharp peak near 560 nm, making the magneto-optical channel the best candidate for detection.
  • Because the fabrication is a liquid electroless process on a masked substrate, magneto-plasmonic sensors of this type could be produced at larger scale without vacuum deposition or electron-beam lithography.
  • Finite-element simulations at 560 nm show a dipolar field enhancement under the magnetic field, consistent with the measured MOKE feature, so the geometry also appears suited to magnetic-field-tunable optical elements.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: a refractive-index scan would turn the paper's line-width comparison into a true figure-of-merit ranking, because $\mathrm{FOM} = \Delta s/\mathrm{FWHM}$ also needs the resonance shift per refractive-index unit; such a measurement can be made on the same chips.
  • Editorial inference: the array period of about 400 nm places diffraction orders in the visible range, so some of the reported extrema may be lattice resonances or Wood–Rayleigh anomalies; angle-resolved spectroscopy would separate single-ring plasmons from lattice effects.
  • Editorial inference: if the silane-masked electroless route generalizes, it could pattern other ferromagnetic–noble-metal combinations, including on curved or flexible surfaces where vacuum lithography is impractical; the paper's own note about reduced uniformity of chemical deposition would be the main limitation to manage.
  • Editorial inference: the coincidence of the simulated 560 nm field enhancement with the MOKE peak suggests the magnetic field redistributes the ring's surface charge rather than simply shifting its dielectric background; sweeping field strength could test whether this redistribution controls the line width.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a wet-chemical fabrication route for Ni–Ag–B nanoring arrays on ITO using nanosphere lithography and selective electroless deposition, with SEM/DLS/FTIR characterization, reflectance and ellipsometric measurements, L-MOKE rotation spectra, and a COMSOL FEM simulation. The authors define effective differential quantities Δeff, Ψeff, and Roteff relative to a thin film, identify features in the 470–614 nm range, and claim that narrow FWHM values near 512 nm and 560 nm indicate superior sensing sensitivity compared with conventional SPR and ellipsometry-SPR.

Significance. If substantiated, the electroless single-bath fabrication would be a practical advance over vacuum lithography for magneto-plasmonic surfaces, and the effective-parameter differential analysis is a sensible way to isolate the nanoring contribution. The structural data and the use of measured histograms to set the simulation geometry are strengths. However, the quantitative central claim of superior sensitivity is not supported: the figure of merit used by the authors requires a refractive-index sensitivity that was never measured, and the plasmonic origin of the spectral features is not tested against angular dispersion, grating-order, or refractive-index data. As a sensing demonstration, the paper's significance is therefore not currently established.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.4, Eq. (12)] The FOM defined in Eq. (12) is FOM = Δs/FWHM, yet the paper never reports a refractive-index-induced resonance shift Δs for any of the features in Figures 5 or 6. The conclusion of superior sensitivity is drawn entirely from FWHM values, but a resonance can be narrow and still insensitive; without Δs, the FOM claim is unsupported by the presented data.
  2. [§3.3, Figs. 5(A)–5(E)] The identification of the 470–614 nm features as surface plasmon resonance is under-verified. The spectra are shown at or near one incident angle (44.96°), and no angular dispersion relation, grating-order assignment, or Wood–Rayleigh anomaly check is provided for the nominally periodic 400-nm-pitch array, so thin-film interference or diffraction effects are not excluded as the origin of the dips and extrema.
  3. [§2.4 and §3.5] The COMSOL simulation does not connect the calculated field distribution to the measured spectra. The text in Section 3.5 calls the simulated object an "isolated nickel nano-ring" while Section 2.4 specifies a periodic array with 400 nm pitch, and no simulated reflection, ellipsometry, or MOKE spectrum is compared with Figures 5–6; the simulation therefore neither identifies the measured spectral features nor quantifies their refractive-index response.
  4. [§3.4 and Conclusion] The claimed advantage over "conventional SPR and ellipsometry-SPR techniques" is not tested: no conventional SPR or ellipsometry-SPR sensor was measured under comparable conditions, and no comparator FOM values are reported. The statement that the FOM is better is a qualitative assertion rather than a demonstrated result.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§3.4 and Conclusion] The FWHM value "3.35" given in the Conclusion lacks units; state nanometers and give the corresponding FWHM values for the Δeff and Ψeff features for direct comparison.
  2. [§2.2] The sample notation is inconsistent: the text switches between "SN-SDS" and "NS-SDS" for the same nanosphere batches; please standardize the naming.
  3. [§3.2] The sentence "measurements will be applied in the simulation section." appears twice in succession; delete the duplicate.
  4. [Figure 5 caption] The Figure 5 caption should specify which panels correspond to the thin-film and nanoring samples and what the orange and blue traces represent in each panel; the current caption is too abbreviated.
  5. [Title] The title contains a typo: "pesponse" should be "response."
  6. [Figures 5 and 6] The spectra in Figures 5 and 6 are presented without error bars or replicate information; since FWHM is the key metric, at least representative variability or replicate measurements should be stated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the fabrication, optical characterization, and COMSOL simulation are self-contained; the FOM-based sensitivity claim is an evidentiary gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

I examined the derivation chain for circular reductions. The simulation geometry (inner radius 100 nm, outer radius 200 nm, height 90 nm, center-to-center distance 400 nm) is taken from FE-SEM histograms (Section 3.2), and the nickel optical constants are taken from independent literature (references [45, 46]); no parameter is fitted to the experimental SPR/MOKE features. The effective parameters Delta_eff, Psi_eff, and Rot_eff are defined as differences between nano-ring and thin-film responses (Eqs. 9-11); these are differential measurements rather than self-referential constructions, and they do not smuggle in the claimed resonance positions. The paper's main quantitative overclaim is that narrow FWHM implies superior sensitivity: Eq. 12 defines FOM = Delta_s / FWHM, with Delta_s being the resonance shift from a refractive-index change, and only the denominator FWHM is experimentally reported. This is a missing measurement and an unsupported inference, not a circularity, because Delta_s is not defined in terms of FWHM and was not fitted or constructed from the reported peaks. Likewise, the identification of the 470-614 nm reflection feature as SPR rather than grating/Wood-Rayleigh behavior is under-verified by the absence of dispersion or refractive-index scans, but that is a physical-origin validation gap, not a definitional equivalence. The few self-citations (references [39] and [44], both involving co-author S. M. Hamidi) are background or methods citations and are not load-bearing for the central claim; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported through them. I therefore find no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters were fitted; simulation inputs are measured geometry (Section 2.4) and literature optical constants. The axioms listed are the unverified assumptions behind the SPR attribution and the FWHM-to-FOM inference. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Maxwell's equations in the frequency domain with a local dielectric tensor adequately model the Ni nano-ring response.
    The COMSOL model solves Eq. (3); no nonlocal or quantum corrections are included.
  • domain assumption Nickel dielectric and magneto-optical constants from refs [45,46] apply to the electroless Ni-Ag-B rings.
    The deposited alloy may have different optical constants due to Ag and B content; this is not verified by measurement.
  • domain assumption Subtracting thin-film response isolates the nano-ring contribution (Eqs. 9-11).
    Assumes identical background and no cross-term between thin film and rings.
  • domain assumption The reflection and MOKE features are surface plasmon resonances, not diffraction or interference effects.
    No dispersion relation or grating-order analysis is presented; the attribution is made in Sections 3.3 to 3.5.
  • ad hoc to paper Narrow FWHM implies better FOM or sensitivity.
    Eq. (12) requires Delta-s, the refractive-index sensitivity, which is not measured; the paper equates narrow FWHM with higher FOM in the conclusion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magneto-plasmonic pesponse of nickel nano-rings prepared by electroless method." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YF6DF2TM

@misc{pith2026250200635,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magneto-plasmonic pesponse of nickel nano-rings prepared by electroless method},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YF6DF2TM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00635}
}
abstract

Magneto-plasmonic nanostructures have emerged as promising candidates for advanced sensing applications. However, conventional fabrication methods, such as lithography and sputtering, often involve high costs and complex processes. This study introduces a novel approach for fabricating nickel nano-rings (200-600 nm in diameter) utilizing nanosphere lithography and selective electroless deposition on ITO substrates. The resulting nickel-silver-boron (Ni-Ag-B) nanoarrays exhibit uniform, durable coatings with robust covalent bonds, providing a simpler, more cost-effective alternative to traditional methods. The unique ring-shaped geometry of the nano-rings enhances plasmonic effects by concentrating the electromagnetic field, thus outperforming other nanostructures. Unlike thin films, these nano-rings demonstrate surface plasmon resonance (SPR) within the 470-614 nm range when illuminated at a 45$^{\deg}$ incident angle. Moreover, ellipsometry parameter calculations and Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect (MOKE) measurements revealed narrow Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) peaks at 512 nm and 560 nm, indicating superior sensitivity for detection compared to conventional SPR and ellipsometry-SPR techniques. Finite element simulations using COMSOL provided valuable insight into the influence of magnetic fields on the electromagnetic response of the nano-rings, confirming their potential for optical communication and highly sensitive sensing technologies. This study addresses limitations in existing magneto-plasmonic systems, offering a scalable and innovative solution for the development of next-generation sensing applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.00635 by the authors.

Figure 4
Figure 4. Characterizations of surface: (A) FE-SEM Image of Nano-ring (NS-SDS (0)), Nano-ring (NS￾SDS (0.0026)) and thin film, (B) i) Distribution of outer radius of nano-ring and ii) Distribution of center￾to-center distance between nano-rings, (C) FT-IR of glass after addition of APTES solution. (A) (B) (C) і) іі) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. The electric field distribution of a solitary nickel nano-ring, for which the wavelength is 560 nm , 420 nm. Results are shown in (A) x-y plane; (B) z-y plane; (C) z-x plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. S. Singh and P. K. Sarswat, From fundamentals to applications: The development of magnetoplasmonics for next-generation technologies, Materials Today Electronics, 4, (2023), 100033, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtelec.2023.100033

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    M. T. I. Ansari, S. K. Raghuwanshi, and S. Kumar, Recent Advancement in Fiber -Optic- Based SPR Biosensor for Food Adulteration Detection —A Review, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience, 22, (2023), 978-988, doi: 10.1109/TNB.2023.3278468

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Kumar, S

    V. Kumar, S. K. Raghuwanshi, and S. Kumar, Advances in SPR -based Fiber Optic Sensors for Voltage/Electric Field Measurement–A Review, IEEE Sensors Journal, 24, (2024), 11986 - 11997, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3373389

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Kataja, S

    M. Kataja, S. Pourjamal and S. van Dijken. Magnetic circular dichroism of non-local surface lattice resonances in magnetic nanoparticle arrays. Optics Express, 24, (2016) , 3562-3571, doi: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.003562

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.24.003562 2016

  5. [5]

    Maccaferri, A

    N. Maccaferri, A. Berger, S. Bonetti, V. Bonanni, M. Kataja, Q. H. Qin, S. van Dijken, Z . Pirzadeh, A. Dmitriev, J. Nogués, J. Åkerman, and P.Vavassori, Tuning the Magneto-Optical Response of Nanosize Ferromagnetic Ni Disks Using the Phase of Localized Plasmons , Physical Review Letters, 111,(2013), 167401

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    V Bonanni, S Bonetti, T Pakizeh, Z Pirzadeh, J Chen, J Nogués, P Vavassori, R Hillenbrand, Designer magnetoplasmonics with nickel nanoferromagnets, Nano Letters, 11, (2011), 5333– 5338

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Maccaferri et al., Nanoscale magnetophotonic s, Journal of Applied Physics, 127, (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5100826

    N. Maccaferri et al., Nanoscale magnetophotonic s, Journal of Applied Physics, 127, (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5100826

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5100826 2020

  8. [8]

    Osaka, Electroless Fabrication of Nanostructures, in Electrochemistry at the Nanoscale, P

    T. Osaka, Electroless Fabrication of Nanostructures, in Electrochemistry at the Nanoscale, P. Schmuki and S. Virtanen Eds. New York, NY: Springer New York, (2009), pp. 321-347

    work page 2009

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    K. Zhu et al., Anisotropic growth of electroless nickel‑phosphorus plating on fine sliver lines for L -shape terminal electrode structure of chip inductor, Applied Surface Science, 496, (2019), 143633, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143633

    2019

  2. [10]

    Horák, K

    M. Horák, K. Bukvišová, V. Švarc, J. Jaskowiec, V. Křápek, and T. Šikola, Comparative study of plasmonic antennas fabricated by electron beam and focused ion beam lithography, Scientific reports, 8, (2018), 9640, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28037-1

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    Sato and T

    H. Sato and T. Homma, Fabrication of magnetic nanodot arrays for patterned magnetic recording media, Journal of Nanosci ence and Nanotechnology, 7, (2007), 225 -231, doi: https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2007.18017

    2007

  4. [12]

    Zhiwei Shi and A. V. Walker, Synthesis of Nickel Nanowires via Electroless Nanowire Deposition on Micropa tterned Substrates, Langmuir, 27, (2011), 11292 -11295, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/la2025878

    2011 doi

  5. [13]

    N. M. Kuruppu Arachchige, P. C. Chambers, A. M. Taylor, Z. L. Highland, and J. C. Garno, Nickel Nanofilms Electrolessly Deposited on Organosilane Nanorings and Characterized by Contact Mode AFM Combined with Magnetic Sample Modulation, ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2, (2019), 21...

    2019 doi

  6. [15]

    M. Pérez-Page et al., Template-based syntheses for shape controlled nanostructures, Elsevier Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 234, (2016), 51 -79, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2016.04.001

    2016 doi

  7. [16]

    Y. Jie, H. Fan, J. R. Niskala, and W. You, Growth of nickel nanoparticles on an organic self- assembled monolayer template by means of electroless plating, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 434, (2013), 194 -199, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.c...

    2013 doi

  8. [17]

    K.-T. Wang, W. -Y. Wang, and T. -C. Wei, Photomask -free, direct selectiv e electroless deposition on glass by controlling surface hydrophilicity, ACS omega, 4, (2019), 7706-7710, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b00259

    2019 doi

  9. [18]

    Azizi, M

    A. Azizi, M. Mohammadi, and S. Sadrnezhaa d, End-closed NiCoFe-B nanotube arrays by electroless method, Materials letters, 65, (2011), 289-292, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2010.10.020

    2011 doi

  10. [19]

    Aftab, M

    M. Aftab, M. S. Mansha, T. Iqbal, and M. Farooq, Surface plasmon excitation: theory, configurations, and applications, Plasmonics, 19, (2024), 1701 -1719, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-023-02095-2

    2024 doi

  11. [20]

    A. R. Halpern and R. M. Co rn, Lithographically patterned electrodeposition of gold, silver, and nickel nanoring arrays with widely tunable near -infrared plasmonic re sonances, ACS nano, 7, (2013), 1755-1762, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/nn3058505

    2013 doi

  12. [21]

    Kataja, T

    M. Kataja, T. Hakala, A. Julku, M. Huttunen, S. van Dijken, and P. Törmä, Surface lattice resonances and magneto -optical response in magnetic nanoparticle arrays, Nature communications, 6, (2015), 7072, doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8072

    2015 doi

  13. [22]

    Pourjamal, M

    S. Pourjamal, M. Kataja, N. Maccaferri, P. Vavassori, and S. Van Dijken, Hybrid Ni/SiO2/Au dimer arrays for high-resolution refractive index sensing, Nanophotonics, 7, (2018), 905-912, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2018-0013

    2018 doi

  14. [23]

    Kataja et al., Hybrid plasmonic lattices with tunable magneto -optical activity , Optics express, 24, (2016), 3652-3662, doi: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.003652

    M. Kataja et al., Hybrid plasmonic lattices with tunable magneto -optical activity , Optics express, 24, (2016), 3652-3662, doi: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.003652

    2016 doi

  15. [24]

    Liang, S

    Y. Liang, S. Pakniyat, Y. Xiang, F. Shi, G. W. Hanson, and C. Cen, Temperature -dependent transverse-field magneto -plasmons properties in InSb, Optical Materials, 112, (2021), 110831, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2021.110831

    2021

  16. [25]

    Murzin, V

    D. Murzin, V. Belyaev, C. Gritsenko, V. Komanicky, and V. Rodionova, Magnetic field sensing elements based on Ni80Fe20 2D magnetoplasmonic crys tals, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 377, (2024), 115773, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2024.115773

    2024

  17. [26]

    monolayer of Ni nanoparticles/dielectric spacer/Au (Ni) film

    O. Yeshchenko, V. Kozachenko, and A. Tomchuk, Surface plasmon resonance in “monolayer of Ni nanoparticles/dielectric spacer/Au (Ni) film” nanostructure: tuning by variation of spacer thickness, Ukrainian journal of physics, 63, (2018), 386 -386, doi: 10.15407/ujpe63.5.386

    2018 doi

  18. [28]

    Sepúlveda, A

    B. Sepúlveda, A. Calle, L. M. Lechuga, and G. Armelles, Highly sensitive detection of biomolecules with the magneto -optic surface-plasmon-resonance sensor, Optics letters, 31, (2006), 1085-1087, doi: https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.001085

    2006 doi

  19. [29]

    David, C

    S. David, C. Polonschii, C. Luculescu, M. Gheorghiu, S. Gáspár, and E. Gheorghiu, Magneto- plasmonic biosensor with enhanced analytical response and stability, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 63, (2015), 525-532, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.08.004

    2015 doi

  20. [30]

    A. Ciuciulkaite et al., Magnetic and all -optical switching prope rties of amorphous Tb x Co 100−x alloys, Physica l Review Materials, 4, (2020), 04418, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.104418

    2020 doi

  21. [31]

    K.-H. Chou et al., Application of strong transverse magneto -optical Kerr effect on high sensitive surface plasmon grating sen sors, Optics express, 22, (2014), 19794 -19802, doi: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.019794

    2014 doi

  22. [32]

    M. A. Kiryanov et al., Surface profile-tailored magneto-optics in magnetoplasmonic crystals, APL Photonics, 7, (2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0072698

    2022 doi

  23. [33]

    I. Mukha et al., Multifunctional magneto -plasmonic Fe3O4/Au nanocomposites: Approaching magnetophoretically -enhanced photot hermal therapy, Nanomaterials, 11, (2021), 1113, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051113

    2021 doi

  24. [34]

    I. V. Malysheva, I. A. Kolmychek, A. M. Romashkina, A. P. Leontiev, K. S. Napolskii, and T. V. Murzina, Magneto-optical effects in hyperbolic metamaterials based on ordered arrays of bisegmented gold/nickel nanorods , Nanotechnology, 32, (2021), 305710, doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/abf691

    2021 doi

  25. [35]

    H. M. Luong, M. T. Pham, B. Ai, T. D. Nguyen, and Y. Zhao, Magnetoplasmonic properties of Ag -Co composite nanohole arrays, Physical Review B, 99, (201 9), 224413, doi: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.224413

    doi

  26. [36]

    N. Maccaferri et al., Ultrasensitive and label -free molecular-level detection enabled by light phase control in magnetoplasmonic na noantennas., Nature communication, 6, (2015), 6150 doi: doi: 10.1038/ncomms7150

    2015 doi

  27. [37]

    Melle et al., Magneto-optical properties of nickel nanowire arrays, Applied physics letters, 83, (2003), 4547-4549, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1630840

    S. Melle et al., Magneto-optical properties of nickel nanowire arrays, Applied physics letters, 83, (2003), 4547-4549, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1630840

    2003 doi

  28. [38]

    L.-Y. Chen et al., Fano resonance and magneto -optical Kerr rotaion in periodic Co/Ni complex plasmonic nanostructure, C hinese Physics B, 25, (2016), 113301, doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/25/11/113301

    2016 doi

  29. [39]

    SM Hamidi, B Mosaeii, M Afsharnia, A Aftabi, Magneto-plasmonic study of aligned Ni, Co and Ni/Co multilayer in polydimethylsiloxane as magnetic field sensor, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials , 417, (2016) , 413 -419, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.078

    2016 doi

  30. [40]

    Mohajerani, Y

    H Mbarak, SM Hamidi, VI Belotelov, AI ChernovE. Mohajerani, Y. Zaatar, Surface lattice resonance-based magneto -plasmonic switch in NiFe pat terned nano -structure, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials , 517 , (2021) , 167387, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167387

    2021

  31. [41]

    Furuhashi, Y

    T. Furuhashi, Y. Yamada, M. Hayashi, S. Ichihara, and H. Usui, Corrosion -resistant nickel thin films by electroless deposition in foam of electrolyte, MRS Communications, 9, (2019), 352-359, doi: https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2018.239

    2019 doi

  32. [42]

    Z. Meng, C. Xue, Q. Zhang, X. Yu, K. Xi, and X. Jia, Preparation of highly monodisperse hybrid silica nanospheres using a one-step emulsion reaction in aqueous solution, Langmuir, 25, (2009), 7879-7883, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/la900458b

    2009 doi

  33. [43]

    Enha nced nickel plating process

    M. A. Abdul Wadi, S. Ming Liew, and S. Lih Lim, "Enha nced nickel plating process", US 20200148589 A1, Western Digital Technologies Inc. (2021)

    2021

  34. [44]

    M. J. Haji Najafi, V. Ahmadi, and S. M. Hamidi, Design and simulation of graphene/2D interlayer surface plasmon resonance biosensor based on ellipsometry method, International Journal of Optics and Photonics, 15, (2021), 27-34, doi: 10.52547/ijop.15.1.27

    2021 doi

  35. [45]

    Loughran, P

    T. Loughran, P. Keatley, E. Hendry, W. Barnes, and R. Hicken, Enhancing the magneto-optical Kerr effect through the use of a plasmonic antenna, Optics express, 26, (2018), 4738-4750, doi: https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.004738

    2018 doi

  36. [46]

    K. Mok, G. Kovács, J. McCord, L. Li, M. Helm, and H. Schmidt, Mag neto-optical coupling in ferromagnetic thin films investigated by vector-magneto-optical generalized ellipsometry, Physical Review B —Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 84, (2011), 094413, doi: https://doi....

    2011 doi

  37. [47]

    Fujiwara and R

    H. Fujiwara and R. W. Collins, Spectroscopic ellipsometry for photovoltaics. Springer, (2018)

    2018

  38. [48]

    Oates, H

    T. Oates, H. Wormeester, H. Arwin, and Progress in surface science 86, Characterization of plasmonic effec ts in thin films and metamaterials using spectroscopic ellipsometry. In: Progress in surface science, Progress in surface science 86, (2011), 328 -376, doi: https://doi.o...

    2011 doi

  39. [49]

    Atmatzakis, N

    E. Atmatzakis, N. Papasimakis, V. Fedotov, G. Vienne, and N. I. Zheludev, Magneto-optical response in bimetallic metamaterials, Nanophot onics, 7, (2018), 199-206, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2016-0162

    2018 doi

  40. [50]

    Offermans et al., Universal Scaling of the Figure of Merit of Plasmonic Sensors, ACS Nano 5, (2011), 5151, doi: 10.1021/nn201227b

    P. Offermans et al., Universal Scaling of the Figure of Merit of Plasmonic Sensors, ACS Nano 5, (2011), 5151, doi: 10.1021/nn201227b

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.