Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 48 references

$U(1)_A$ Breaking in Hot QCD in the Chiral Limit

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that U(1)_A breaking survives the chiral limit at any temperature in two-flavor hot QCD, carried by a singular spike in the Dirac spectrum that originates from a free instanton gas.

desk verdict Quenched random matrix model is a genuine success; the full-QCD chiral-limit prediction rests on an untested bulk-decoupling assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01238 v1 pith:YC57O3OR submitted 2025-02-03 hep-lat hep-phhep-th

Tamas G. Kovacs (Eotvos U. , Debrecen , Inst. Nucl. Res.) This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-lathep-phhep-th PACS 12.38.Gc11.30.Rd
keywords U(1)_AbreakingchirallimitDiracspectraldensityinstantongasrandommatrixmodeltopologicalsusceptibilityoverlapoperatorpion-delta
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the anomalous U(1)_A axial symmetry of QCD is not restored even in the strict chiral limit at high temperature. The mechanism is a singular peak in the density of small Dirac eigenvalues, caused by the mixing of instanton and anti-instanton zero modes in a nearly free, dilute instanton gas. The paper builds a two-parameter random matrix model that reproduces the quenched overlap Dirac spectrum and can be simulated with dynamical quarks for masses and volumes beyond direct lattice reach. From that model it derives that the pion-minus-delta susceptibility stays nonzero for two flavors in the chiral limit, even though the topological susceptibility vanishes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the zero-mode zone (ZMZ) random matrix model, a sparse anti-Hermitian matrix built only from instanton-anti-instanton pairs with off-diagonal elements $c \exp(-\pi T r_{ij})$, where $c$ is a fitted prefactor and $r_{ij}$ is the spatial distance between the lumps. The number and locations of instantons and anti-instantons follow independent Poisson distributions with the quenched topological susceptibility as the density; this free-instanton-gas ansatz makes the model tractable with dynamical quarks. Generalizing the Banks-Casher integral to the resulting singular spectral density is what turns the model into quantitative predictions for chiral observables such as the condensate and the pion-delta susceptibility.

What would settle it

A direct lattice calculation with dynamical chiral quarks at fixed temperature just above $T_c$ could decide: if $\chi_\pi - \chi_\delta$ extrapolates to zero as the quark mass goes to zero at large volume, or if the small-eigenvalue density $\rho(\lambda)$ develops a gap or becomes analytic as volume grows, the central claim is refuted. A cheaper check is whether the quenched model's predicted volume dependence of the lowest-eigenvalue distribution survives at larger volumes than those fitted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the chiral limit of two-flavor hot QCD, the difference of the pion and delta susceptibilities is predicted to be nonzero, $\chi_\pi - \chi_\delta \sim m^{N_f-2} \chi_0 V$, because the Dirac spectral density develops an integrable singular power law at zero, $\rho(\lambda) \propto \lambda^\alpha$ with $\alpha = -0.770(5)$ in the quenched case and approaching $-1$ as the chiral limit is taken. This singular spike comes from the would-be zero modes of a free gas of instantons and anti-instantons, whose exponential mixing produces eigenvalues that remain far smaller than the quark mass down to arbitrarily small mass. Consequently the standard Banks-Casher integrals must be generalized, and the axial anomaly continues to affect the pion-delta susceptibility even though the topological susceptibility vanishes in the chiral limit.

Load-bearing premise

The argument relies on the quark determinant splitting cleanly into an instanton-zero-mode part and an uncorrelated bulk part that cancels in expectations, and on every zero-mode-zone eigenvalue staying much smaller than the quark mass all the way down to the chiral limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For two light flavors, $\chi_\pi - \chi_\delta$ remains nonzero in the chiral limit at any finite temperature above $T_c$, so U(1)_A breaking does not disappear.
  • The chiral condensate in the high-temperature phase vanishes as $m^{N_f-1} \chi_0 V$ for $N_f > 1$, consistent with restoration of the non-singlet chiral symmetry.
  • Taking the thermodynamic limit first is essential: in a finite volume the singularity is regulated and the chiral-limit pion-delta susceptibility difference vanishes.
  • Because the magnitude of the effect is set by the quenched topological susceptibility, it becomes small at high temperature but never exactly zero, so the phenomenon is strongest just above $T_c$.
  • Direct lattice observation of the effect requires a chiral Dirac operator for both sea and valence quarks, plus volumes large enough to contain several instantons and anti-instantons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: if the spike exponent indeed tends to $-1$ in the chiral limit, other spectral sums with higher powers of $\lambda$ in the numerator may develop logarithmic or divergent behavior, so different observables could show different apparent restoration temperatures.
  • Extension: the model implies a concrete scaling test for direct lattice simulations: at fixed small quark mass, the pion-delta susceptibility difference should grow with volume in the regime where the spike forms.
  • Extension: the mechanism ties the persistence of U(1)_A breaking to the temperature dependence of the quenched topological susceptibility, which also drives axion physics; if correct, the high-temperature axion mass and the U(1)_A-breaking signal would share the same suppression factor.
  • Extension: tightly bound instanton-anti-instanton pairs, which the model predicts alongside the free gas, would contribute eigenvalues that stay away from the singular spike and therefore would not alter the chiral-limit predictions for spike-dominated quantities.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a random matrix model for the near-zero 'zero mode zone' (ZMZ) of the overlap Dirac operator in high-temperature QCD, in which instantons and anti-instantons form a free gas with exponentially small mixing. Fitting the two model parameters (the quenched topological susceptibility and a mixing prefactor) to the distribution of the lowest overlap eigenvalue on a 32^3 x 8 lattice at T = 1.1 T_c, the model predicts the lowest-eigenvalue distribution on a larger volume with no further fitting. For full QCD the dynamical quark determinant is restricted to the ZMZ, assuming the bulk part cancels in expectation values. The model predicts chi(m) = m^{N_f} chi_0 for the topological susceptibility and, in the chiral limit, chi_pi - chi_delta ~ m^{N_f-2} chi_0, which for N_f = 2 remains nonzero even though the topological susceptibility vanishes, implying persistent U(1)_A breaking at high temperature.

Significance. The paper's central claim is striking: if valid, it shows that U(1)_A breaking is not restored in the chiral limit of high-temperature QCD, with the breaking strength set by the quenched topological susceptibility. The quenched part of the paper is genuinely strengthened by the out-of-sample volume prediction (Fig. 3): the model parameters are fixed on one volume and the larger-volume distribution is reproduced without refitting. The mass-dependence predictions in Eqs. (15)-(16) are concrete and falsifiable, and the model is simple enough to simulate in regimes inaccessible to lattice QCD. The main caveat is that the full-QCD predictions depend on an asserted factorization of the quark determinant that is not tested; the manuscript would be considerably strengthened by a numerical test of that assumption or by a clear statement of the conditions under which it holds.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, after Eq. (9)] The full-QCD weight in Eq. (10) is obtained by dropping the bulk part of the quark determinant based on the statement that 'the contribution of the bulk is not expected to be correlated with that of the ZMZ.' This factorization is the central load-bearing assumption for the chiral-limit prediction in Eq. (16), yet the paper provides no argument or numerical evidence for it. Since both the ZMZ eigenvalues and the bulk eigenvalues are functionals of the same gauge field, the bulk determinant can in principle depend on the instanton configuration and thereby change the effective instanton density away from the quenched chi_0, which would modify the m-scaling in Eqs. (15)-(16). I recommend adding a concrete check, for example computing on the quenched ensembles of Fig. 3 the bulk determinant reweighting factor conditional on the ZMZ eigenvalue distribution, or comparing the model's predictions with dynamical lattice data at finite m where the spectral peak is resolvable.
  2. [Section 5, Eq. (13) and following discussion] The derivation of chi(m) = m^{N_f} chi_0 and of Eqs. (15)-(16) assumes that for arbitrarily small m all ZMZ eigenvalues remain much smaller than m, so that the product in Eq. (13) is essentially unity. The paper's support for this is the heuristic argument that a more dilute instanton gas implies larger separations and hence exponentially smaller splittings; this argument implicitly assumes an infinite volume. For a fixed finite volume, as m -> 0 the Poisson gas has a finite probability of containing zero or one instanton, and the smallest-eigenvalue distribution is not of the dilute-gas form used. Section 7 notes that the order of the thermodynamic and chiral limits matters, but the derivation in Section 5 should state the intended ordering (for instance, m -> 0 after V -> infinity) and justify the uniform validity of |lambda_i| << m in that limit.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 7, Eq. (16)] The volume factor V in Eq. (16) is ambiguous: if the susceptibility is intensive (per unit volume), the factor should be absent; if it is extensive, its presence should be explained. The m-dependence is unaffected, but the normalization must be clarified for comparison with lattice data.
  2. [Fig. 4] The simulation data in Fig. 4 are shown without error bars, and the range of masses is not stated; adding error bars and the simulation parameters (volume, number of configurations) would support the claim that the data follow m^2 chi_0 'perfectly'.
  3. [Section 6, Eq. (14)] The power-law fit alpha = -0.770(5) is said to be obtained from the 'common envelope' of finite-volume spectral densities, but the fitting procedure (range of lambda, handling of finite-volume effects, statistical errors) is not described; this makes the quoted error difficult to interpret.
  4. [Conclusions] The statement that 'our arguments are valid up to arbitrarily high but finite temperatures' is a model-based extrapolation; the paper should explicitly acknowledge that the strength of the predicted effect is set by the quenched topological susceptibility, which falls steeply with temperature, so the signal is expected to be very small at high T.
  5. [Section 7, Eqs. (15)-(16)] The predictions of Eqs. (15)-(16) are not compared with any existing dynamical lattice results at finite m; even a qualitative comparison (e.g., with the JLQCD data cited in Refs. [14-18]) would help calibrate the model and test the factorization assumption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: fitted parameters are tested on independent volumes and full-QCD predictions follow from the model, not from fitted targets.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The quenched random-matrix model has two parameters (chi_0 and A); both are fixed from quenched lattice data (chi_0 by counting exact zero modes, A from the lowest-eigenvalue distribution at L=2.5 fm), and the model is then tested on a larger volume (L=3.5 fm) without refitting, which is an independent prediction. The full-QCD extension introduces the quark determinant as a reweighting factor; the results chi(m)=m^2 chi_0 (Fig. 4 and Eq. (12)) and chi_pi - chi_delta = m^{Nf-2} chi_0 V (Eq. (16)) are mathematical consequences of that model, not fits to those quantities. The bulk-factorization assumption in Section 4 is an unvalidated physical input, but it is a stated approximation rather than a disguised use of the target result. Self-citations (notably [30] and [39]) support motivational or peripheral claims; the central validation is performed in this paper against external lattice overlap spectra. No equation reduces to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest on five modeling assumptions about the high-temperature instanton gas and the decoupling of the zero-mode zone from the bulk. No new physical entities such as particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Mixing prefactor C in Eq. (7) = 0.35
    Fitted to the distribution of the lowest nonzero overlap Dirac eigenvalue on the small quenched lattice ensemble (L=2.5 fm, T=1.1Tc); controls all near-zero eigenvalue splittings.
  • Quenched topological susceptibility chi_0 = Not quoted in text
    Measured on the same quenched ensemble by counting exact zero modes; sets the instanton density in the Poisson gas via Eq. (8).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Above Tc, topological charge forms a free noninteracting gas with independent uniformly distributed instantons and Poisson counts for instanton and anti-instanton numbers.
    Based on refs [29,30]; used to build the random matrix ensemble in Section 3.
  • domain assumption Zero modes are exponentially localized with localization length 1/(pi T), so the mixing between an instanton and an anti-instanton is C exp(-pi T r) as in Eq. (7).
    High-temperature instanton and caloron results [27,28], invoked in Section 3.
  • domain assumption Instanton distances are measured in a 3D spatial box, ignoring the temporal dimension.
    The paper adopts a dimensionally reduced picture in Section 3 because the typical instanton size is expected to be comparable to the temporal box size.
  • domain assumption The zero mode zone is separated from and uncorrelated with the bulk spectrum, so the bulk determinant factor cancels in ZMZ expectations.
    Stated in Section 4 around Eq. (9); this is load-bearing for the full-QCD reweighting.
  • domain assumption For arbitrarily small quark mass, all zero-mode-zone eigenvalues remain much smaller than m, so det(D+m) approximates m^(N_f(n_I+n_A)) as in Eqs. (11)-(13).
    Argued in Section 5 by a self-consistency argument: determinant suppression dilutes the instanton gas, which makes splittings smaller; this is not proven from QCD.
  • standard math Atiyah-Singer index theorem: topological charge Q implies at least |Q| exact zero modes of the Dirac operator.
    Used in Section 2 to relate topological charge to exact zero eigenvalues and to justify the zero-mode-zone construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $U(1)_A$ Breaking in Hot QCD in the Chiral Limit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YC57O3OR

@misc{pith2026250201238,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $U(1)_A$ Breaking in Hot QCD in the Chiral Limit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YC57O3OR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01238}
}
abstract

We propose a simple instanton-based random matrix model of hot QCD that in the quenched case precisely reproduces the distribution of the lowest lattice overlap Dirac eigenvalues. Even after including dynamical quarks the model can be easily simulated in volumes and for quark masses that will be out of reach for direct lattice simulations in the foreseeable future. Our simulations show that quantities connected to the $U(1)_A$ and $SU(N_f)_A$ chiral symmetry are dominated by eigenvalues in a peak of the spectral density that becomes singular at zero in the thermodynamic limit. This spectral peak turns out to be produced by an ideal instanton gas. By generalizing Banks-Casher type integrals for the singular spectral density, definite predictions can be given for physical quantities that are essential to test chiral symmetry breaking, but presently impossible to compute reliably with direct lattice simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01238 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A schematic representation of the spectral density of the Dirac operator below the critical temperature in the hadronic phase (left), and above the critical temperature, in the quark-gluon plasma phase (right). 1. Introduction Quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the theory of strong interactions has an approximate (2) × (2) × (1) × (1) symmetry. The flavor non-singlet vector symmetry is a result of the approximate equalit… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The spectral density of the overlap Dirac operator on a set of quenched gauge configurations with temporal size = 8 and temperature = 1.05. The exact zero eigenvalues have been removed, they would show up as a delta function at zero. a typical example of the overlap Dirac spectrum on quenched gauge field configurations slightly above the critical temperature. In the quenched case there is a genuine phase transition … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The distribution of the lowest overlap Dirac eigenvalue on two ensembles of quenched gauge configurations with different volumes. The temperature is = 1.1 in both cases, and for a better resolution of the small eigenvalues we plotted the distribution of the (natural) log of the eigenvalues. The triangles represent the lattice data, the continuous lines are calculated from the random matrix model. We used the smaller… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The topological susceptibility as a function of the quark mass, obtained from a simulation of the random matrix model, including the reweighting with the quark determinant for two degenerate quark flavors. The simulation data is plotted with triangles, and the continuo…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The spectral density of the quenched matrix model for different system sizes. The continuous line is a power-law fit to the common envelope of the curves, corresponding to different volumes. to unity, and the approximation in Eq. (12) remains valid even in the chiral l…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Banks and A

    T. Banks and A. Casher, Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Confining Theories , Nucl. Phys. B 169, 103-125 (1980), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(80)90255-2

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(80)90255-2 1980

  2. [2]

    Narayanan and H

    R. Narayanan and H. Neuberger, A Construction of lattice chiral gauge theories , Nucl. Phys. B 443, 305-385 (1995), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00111-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00111-5 1995

  3. [3]

    R. G. Edwards, U. M. Heller, J. E. Kiskis and R. Narayanan, Chiral condensate in the deconfined phase of quenched gauge theories , Phys. Rev. D 61, 074504 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.074504

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.074504 2000

  4. [4]

    Alexandru and I

    A. Alexandru and I. Horváth, Phases of SU(3) Gauge Theories with Fundamen- tal Quarks via Dirac Spectral Density , Phys. Rev. D 92, no.4, 045038 (2015), doi.org/doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.045038

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.045038 2015

  5. [5]

    Alexandru and I

    A. Alexandru and I. Horváth, Possible New Phase of Thermal QCD , Phys. Rev. D 100, no.9, 094507 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.094507

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.094507 2019

  6. [6]

    Kaczmarek, L

    O. Kaczmarek, L. Mazur and S. Sharma, Eigenvalue spectra of QCD and the fate of UA(1) breaking towards the chiral limit , Phys. Rev. D 104, no.9, 094518 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094518

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.094518 2021

  7. [7]

    H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, S. Mukherjee, A. Tomiya, X. D. Wang and Y . Zhang,Correlated Dirac Eigenvalues and Axial Anomaly in Chiral Symmetric QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, no.8, 082001 (2021), doi.org/doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.082001

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.082001 2021

  8. [8]

    Kaczmarek, R

    O. Kaczmarek, R. Shanker and S. Sharma, Eigenvalues of the QCD Dirac matrix with im- proved staggered quarks in the continuum limit , Phys. Rev. D 108, no.9, 094501 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.094501

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.094501 2023

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Alexandru, C

    A. Alexandru, C. Bonanno, M. D’Elia and I. Horváth, Phys. Rev. D 110, no.7, 074515 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.074515

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Alexandru and I

    A. Alexandru and I. Horváth, Unusual Features of QCD Low-Energy Modes in the Infrared Phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, no.5, 052303 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.052303

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Alexandru and I

    A. Alexandru and I. Horváth, Anderson metal-to-critic al transition in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137370 (2022), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137370

    2022

  4. [12]

    X. L. Meng et al. [/u1D712QCD and CLQCD], Separation of infrared and bulk in thermal QCD , JHEP 12, 101 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)101

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Giordano and T

    M. Giordano and T. G. Kovacs, Localization of Dirac Fermions in Finite-Temperature Gauge Theory, Universe 7, no.6, 194 (2021), doi:10.3390/universe7060194

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Cossu, S

    G. Cossu, S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, H. Matsufuru and J. I. Noaki, Finite temperature study of the axial U(1) symmetry on the lattice w ith overlap fermion formulation, 13 /u1D448(1) /u1D434Breaking in Hot QCD in the Chiral Limit Tamas G. Kovacs Phys. Rev. D ...

    2013 doi

  7. [15]

    Tomiya, G

    A. Tomiya, G. Cossu, S. Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko and J. Noaki, Evidence of effective axial U(1) symmetry restoration at high tempera ture QCD, Phys. Rev. D 96, no.3, 034509 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034509

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    Aoki et al

    S. Aoki et al. [JLQCD], Study of the axial /u1D448(1) anomaly at high temperature with lattice chiral fermions, Phys. Rev. D 103, no.7, 074506 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074506

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    Aoki et al

    S. Aoki et al. [JLQCD], Axial U(1) symmetry near the pseudocritical temperature in/u1D441/u1D453= 2+1 lattice QCD with chiral fermions, PoS LATTICE2023, 185 (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0185

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    D. Ward, S. Aoki, Y . Aoki, H. Fukaya, S. Hashimoto, I. Kan amori, T. Kaneko, J. Goswami and Y . Zhang, Study of symmetries in finite temperature /u1D441/u1D453= 2 QCD with Möbius Domain Wall Fermions, [arXiv:2412.06574 [hep-lat]]

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Azcoiti, Spectral density of the Dirac-Ginsparg-Wilson operator, c hiral U(1)A anomaly, and analyticity in the high temperature phase of QCD Phys

    V . Azcoiti, Spectral density of the Dirac-Ginsparg-Wilson operator, c hiral U(1)A anomaly, and analyticity in the high temperature phase of QCD Phys. Rev. D 107, no.11, 11 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.114516

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    S. Aoki, H. Fukaya and Y . Taniguchi, Chiral symmetry restoration, eigenvalue density of Dirac operator and axial U(1) anomaly at finite temperature , Phys. Rev. D86, 114512 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.114512

    2012 doi

  13. [21]

    M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer, The Index of elliptic operators. 5. , Annals Math. 93, 139-149 (1971) doi:10.2307/1970757

    1971 doi

  14. [22]

    Schäfer and E

    T. Schäfer and E. V . Shuryak, Instantons in QCD , Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 323-426 (1998) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.70.323

    1998 doi

  15. [23]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. Guenther, K. H. Kampert, S. D. K atz, T. Kawanai, T. G. Ko- vacs, S. W . Mages, A. Pasztor and F. Pittler, et al. Calculation of the axion mass based on high-temperature lattice quantum chromodynamics , Nature 539, no.7627, 69-71 (2016), doi:10.1038/n...

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, M. Mariti, G. Martinelli, M. Mesit i, F. Negro, F. Sanfilippo and G. Villadoro, Axion phenomenology and /u1D703-dependence from /u1D441/u1D453= 2 + 1 lattice QCD, JHEP 03, 155 (2016), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2016)155

    2016 doi

  17. [25]

    Petreczky, H

    P. Petreczky, H. P. Schadler and S. Sharma, The topological susceptibility in fi- nite temperature QCD and axion cosmology , Phys. Lett. B 762, 498-505 (2016), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.063

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    Boccaletti and D

    A. Boccaletti and D. Nogradi, The semi-classical approximation at high temperature revisited, JHEP 03, 045 (2020), doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)045

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    D. J. Gross, R. D. Pisarski and L. G. Y affe, QCD and Instantons at Finite Temperature , Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 43 (1981), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.53.43. 14 /u1D448(1) /u1D434Breaking in Hot QCD in the Chiral Limit Tamas G. Kovacs

    1981 doi

  20. [28]

    Garcia Perez, A

    M. Garcia Perez, A. Gonzalez-Arroyo, C. Pena and P. van B aal, Weyl-Dirac zero mode for calorons, Phys. Rev. D 60, 031901 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.031901

    1999 doi

  21. [29]

    Bonati, M

    C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, H. Panagopoulos and E. Vicari, Change of /u1D703Dependence in 4D SU(N) Gauge Theories Across the Deconfinement Transition , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, no.25, 252003 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252003

    2013 doi

  22. [30]

    R. A. Vig and T. G. Kovacs, Ideal topological gas in the high temperature phase of SU(3) gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 103, no.11, 114510 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114510

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    E. V . Shuryak and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Random matrix theory and spectral sum rules for the Dirac operator in QCD , Nucl. Phys. A 560, 306-320 (1993), doi:10.1016/0375-9474(93)90098-I

    1993 doi

  24. [32]

    Sharan et al

    U. Sharan et al. [UKQCD], On the spectral density from instantons in quenched QCD , Phys. Rev. D 60, 054501 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.054501

    1999 doi

  25. [33]

    Giordano, Constraints on the Dirac spectrum from chiral symmetry restoration, Phys

    M. Giordano, Constraints on the Dirac spectrum from chiral symmetry restoration, Phys. Rev. D 110, no.9, L091504 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.L091504

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Giordano, Constraints on the Dirac spectrum from chiral symmetry rest oration and the fate of U(1) /u1D434symmetry, PoS LATTICE2024, 188 (2025) doi.org/doi:10.22323/1.466.0188

    M. Giordano, Constraints on the Dirac spectrum from chiral symmetry rest oration and the fate of U(1) /u1D434symmetry, PoS LATTICE2024, 188 (2025) doi.org/doi:10.22323/1.466.0188

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    Kanazawa and N

    T. Kanazawa and N. Y amamoto, Quasi-instantons in QCD with chiral symmetry restoration , Phys. Rev. D 91, 105015 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.105015

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    Kanazawa and N

    T. Kanazawa and N. Y amamoto, U (1) axial symmetry and Dirac spectra in QCD at high temperature, JHEP 01, 141 (2016), doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2016)141

    2016 doi

  29. [37]

    T. C. Kraan and P. van Baal, Periodic instantons with nontrivial holonomy, Nucl. Phys. B 533, 627-659 (1998), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00590-2

    1998 doi

  30. [38]

    J. A. Mickley, W . Kamleh and D. B. Leinweber, Numerical evidence for fractional topological objects in SU(3) gauge theory , Phys. Rev. D 109, no.9, 094507 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094507

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    T. G. Kovacs, Fate of Chiral Symmetries in the Quark-Gluon Plasma from an I nstanton- Based Random Matrix Model of QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, no.13, 131902 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.131902

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    Philipsen, Lattice Constraints on the QCD Chiral Phase Transition at Fi nite Temperature and Baryon Density, Symmetry 13, no.11, 2079 (2021), doi.org/doi:10.3390/sym13112079

    O. Philipsen, Lattice Constraints on the QCD Chiral Phase Transition at Fi nite Temperature and Baryon Density, Symmetry 13, no.11, 2079 (2021), doi.org/doi:10.3390/sym13112079

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    Cuteri, O

    F. Cuteri, O. Philipsen and A. Sciarra, On the order of the QCD chiral phase transition for different numbers of quark flavours JHEP 11, 141 (2021), doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)141

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    Mitra, F

    S. Mitra, F. Karsch and S. Sharma, Towards a parameter-free determination of critical ex- ponents and chiral phase transition temperature in QCD , PoS LATTICE2024, 187 (2025), doi.org/doi:10.22323/1.466.0187. 15 /u1D448(1) /u1D434Breaking in Hot QCD in the Chiral Limit Tamas G. Kovacs

    2025 doi

  35. [43]

    Aarts, J

    G. Aarts, J. Aichelin, C. Allton, A. Athenodorou, D. Bac htis, C. Bonanno, N. Brambilla, E. Bratkovskaya, M. Bruno and M. Caselle, et al. Phase Transitions in Particle Physics: Results and Perspectives from Lattice Quantum Chromo-Dyna mics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 133, 104070 ...

    2023

  36. [44]

    Fejős, Perturbative RG analysis of the condensate dependence of th e axial anomaly in the three flavor linear sigma model , Symmetry 13, no.3, 488 (2021), doi:10.3390/sym13030488

    G. Fejős, Perturbative RG analysis of the condensate dependence of th e axial anomaly in the three flavor linear sigma model , Symmetry 13, no.3, 488 (2021), doi:10.3390/sym13030488

    2021 doi

  37. [45]

    Fejos, Second-order chiral phase transition in three-flavor quant um chromodynamics?, Phys

    G. Fejos, Second-order chiral phase transition in three-flavor quant um chromodynamics?, Phys. Rev. D 105, no.7, L071506 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L071506

    2022 doi

  38. [46]

    Fejos and A

    G. Fejos and A. Patkos, Thermal behavior of effective UA(1) anomaly couplings in reflection of higher topological sectors , Phys. Rev. D 109, no.3, 036035 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.036035

    2024 doi

  39. [47]

    Fejos and T

    G. Fejos and T. Hatsuda, Order of the SU(Nf)× SU(Nf) chiral transition via the functional renor- malization group, Phys. Rev. D110, no.1, 016021 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.016021

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    F. L. Braghin, /u1D448/u1D434(1) symmetry-breaking quark interactions from vacuum polariz ation, Eur. Phys. J. A 60, no.9, 178 (2024) doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01390-8. 16

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.