Circular Microalgae-Based Carbon Control for Net Zero

Federico Zocco; Joan Garc\'ia; Wassim M. Haddad

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 74 references

Circular Microalgae-Based Carbon Control for Net Zero

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that net zero can be framed as a network control problem in which an anaerobic digester's CO2 emissions are balanced by a microalgae cultivation, requiring 625 liters of algae per liter of digester volume at steady state.

desk verdict The theorem is solid, but the paper's headline 625:1 volume ratio is the result of a unit error and an omitted biomass concentration term. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02382 v1 pith:VSN7JOAN submitted 2025-02-04 math.DS cs.LGmath.OC

Federico Zocco , Joan García , Wassim M. Haddad This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DScs.LGmath.OC MSC 93D1593C1037N35

keywords netzerocompartmentaldynamicalthermodynamicsthermodynamicalmaterialnetworksfinite-timestabilizationreinforcementlearningcontrolmicroalgaecarbonsequestrationanaerobicdigestiondioxidecircularity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that atmospheric carbon dioxide can be managed as a material circulating through a network of thermodynamic compartments, and that reaching net zero can therefore be posed as a network control problem. The authors model an anaerobic digester as the emission source, a microalgae culture as the sink, and two virtual ducts connecting both to the atmosphere. They derive a finite-time stabilizing controller for the digester whose settling time is a tunable parameter, and they compute that compensating the digester's steady-state CO2 output requires a microalgae cultivation 625 times the digester's volume, at which point their circularity measure reaches zero, their definition of net zero. They then train eight reinforcement-learning controllers to adjust light intensity in the microalgae model and report that every one increased the carbon-uptake reward over the training run. If the balance equation and the unit comparison in the model hold, the paper provides a quantitative target for algal carbon sequestration and a control-theoretic template for other point sources.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the compartmental mass balance of the network, especially the atmosphere balance (23), which writes the CO2 accumulation rate as the difference between digester outflow $\dot{m}_{1,2}$ and microalgae uptake $\dot{m}_{2,3}$; the 625 ratio is the steady-state solution $V_m = (\dot{m}_{1,2}/\dot{m}_{2,3})V_d$ of that balance. The finite-time controller rests on a Lyapunov function $V(x,x_0,T_{\max})=p(x^{\top}x)^q$ with $p$ and $q$ chosen so that the settling time satisfies $T\le T_{\max}$ regardless of the initial state, reducing the closed loop to $\dot{x}=-\frac{1}{2}V'^{\top}$. For the sink, the central object is the nonaffine-in-control Monod model (15)-(18), with light intensity as input and carbon uptake (20) as the reward; non-affinity in the control is what pushes the authors toward reinforcement learning rather than the affine finite-time framework.

What would settle it

Recompute the atmosphere balance (23) with the biomass concentration made explicit, so the sink term is $K_{CO_2}\rho(S,I)X_{ALG}$ as it is in the substrate balance (16), and convert units through the identity $1\ \mu mol/\mu m^3 = 10^{12}\ mmol/L$. Using the paper's steady-state values ($\dot{m}_{1,2}=175\ mmol\,L^{-1}d^{-1}$, $\dot{m}_{2,3}=0.28\ \mu mol\,\mu m^{-3}d^{-1}$, $X_{ALG}\approx 50\ \mu m^3/L$) in $0=\dot{m}_{1,2}V_d-\dot{m}_{2,3}X_{ALG}V_m$ gives a required volume of about 12,500 L instead of 625 L, which would settle whether the paper's central compensation claim survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, on the paper's own terms, is that the net-zero problem for a point source can be reorganized as an adversarial balance between a regulated emitter and a regulated sink. The source compartment is an anaerobic digester whose CO2 outflow $\dot{m}_{1,2}$ is controlled by an initial-condition-dependent finite-time optimal controller (Theorem 2): choosing $T_{\max}$ fixes the settling-time bound, and the closed-loop dynamics reduce to $\dot{\tilde{x}} = -\tfrac{1}{2}V'^{\top}(\tilde{x},x_0,T_{\max})$. The sink compartment is a Monod-type microalgae culture in which the CO2 uptake rate is $\dot{m}_{2,3}=K_{CO_2}\rho(S,I)$, with light intensity $I(t)$ as the control. At steady state the paper equates the per-volume fluxes through the balance $0=\dot{m}_{1,2}V_d-\dot{m}_{2,3}V_m$, obtaining $V_m=625\,V_d$; with that volume the circularity index $\lambda_b$ equals $0$, which the paper equates with the net-zero target. Finally, the paper reports that eight reinforcement-learning algorithms trained to maximize $K_{CO_2}\rho(S,I)$ through light intensity all improved the reward, with augmented random search requiring the least training time.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands or falls on the claim that the digester emission rate per volume and the microalgae uptake rate per volume can be compared directly as written in equation (23) and Remark 3, with the uptake term already counting the algae biomass; if the units or the missing biomass factor do not match, the 625:1 volume ratio changes or disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At steady state, fully offsetting the CO2 emissions of a one-liter anaerobic digester in this model requires a 625-liter microalgae cultivation, and that volume makes the circularity metric $\lambda$ equal zero, the paper's net-zero condition.
The digester's CO2 outflow can be stabilized to a prescribed operating equilibrium in a finite time chosen in advance by the controller parameter $T_{\max}$, independently of the initial condition.
All eight tested reinforcement-learning controllers increased the mean carbon-uptake reward over 200,000 training steps; augmented random search finished fastest with a final reward close to the best, so light intensity is a viable control channel for algal carbon uptake.
Because the microalgae system is nonaffine in the control, the classical finite-time design is not directly applicable to the sink, whereas the learned controllers do not require that structural condition.
The five-compartment design is intended to generalize: replacing the digester by another CO2 source only changes the source compartment's mass balance, so the same network-control template can be applied to other emitters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct stress test of the 625 number is to restore the biomass concentration $X_{ALG}$ in the sink term of equation (23), matching the Monod balance (16); since $X_{ALG}$ reaches roughly $50\ \mu m^3/L$ at steady state, the required cultivation volume could shift substantially, and the same check would settle whether the unit equivalence asserted in Remark 3 holds.
The RL result suggests a testable comparison: running an extremum-seeking or other classical nonaffine controller on the same Monod model would show how much of the reported uptake gain is due to the learning algorithm rather than to reward shaping or the dynamics of the model.
The circularity metric used here could rank alternative sinks—such as forestation, direct air capture, or chemical absorption—by the same balance equation, making the 625:1 ratio a benchmark against which other sequestration options can be compared.
The finite-time controller requires an invertible input matrix and full-state feedback, so an output-feedback or observer-based extension would be the natural next step before the source controller could be deployed on a real anaerobic digestion plant.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First, the punchline: the paper's central quantitative claim is wrong. The 625:1 microalgae-to-digester volume ratio is obtained by dividing 175 mmol/L/d by 0.28 µmol/µm^3/d and asserting in Remark 3 that these units are equivalent. They are not. The second rate is per unit of biomass volume, not per liter of cultivation, and the balance in eq. (47) omits the biomass concentration XALG. Including the steady-state value from Fig. 3a, XALG ≈ 50 µm^3/L, pushes the required volume ratio to roughly 12,500, not 625. This is a load-bearing error, not a typo: the abstract, eq. (48), and the lambda_b=0 net-zero claim all rest on it.

What is genuinely new here is Theorem 2. The initial-condition-dependent fixed-time optimal control result is a real extension of Haddad and L'Afflitto's finite-time theorem, and the proof, including the HJB verification, checks out. The TMN carbon network is a new application of the authors' own compartmental framework, and the RL comparison is an honest, if limited, benchmark of eight algorithms. Credit where due: the source code is public, the parameter values are tabulated, and the paper says plainly that the RL results are single runs.

The soft spots, in proportion. First, the unit mistake is compounded by the atmosphere balance (23), which mixes flow rates with different reference volumes without defining the atmosphere compartment volume. Second, the RL study is too weak to support anything beyond 'these algorithms all improve the reward in one run'; the authors acknowledge this, but the discussion still over-reads the ARS result. Third, the self-citation is heavy but not disqualifying; the cited TMN papers are directly relevant.

So the headline result collapses, but the theorem and the modeling framework could survive a major revision. I'd send this to peer review with the expectation that referees force a correct dimensional analysis and a recomputed volume ratio. I would not cite the 625 figure, but I might cite the theorem if it gets cleaned up and published separately.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a compartmental thermodynamical network model that circulates carbon dioxide among an anaerobic digester, the atmosphere, and a microalgae cultivation. It proves an initial-condition-dependent finite-time stabilizing controller for the affine digester dynamics (Theorem 2), uses the model to compute that a microalgae cultivation volume 625 times the digester volume is needed to compensate steady-state emissions, and compares eight reinforcement-learning controllers trained to maximize microalgal CO2 uptake through light intensity. The authors conclude that a 625-fold volume ratio yields λ_b = 0, i.e., net zero, and that all eight RL controllers increased carbon absorption. The source code is publicly available.

Significance. If the quantitative claims held, the paper would offer a useful systems-level template for treating net zero as a network control problem. The control-theoretic extension in Theorem 2 and its proof appear sound and reproducible, and the open-source implementation is a constructive feature. The RL comparison, while based on limited runs, provides a starting point for light-driven microalgae control. However, the central quantitative result — the 625:1 microalgae-to-digester volume ratio and the resulting λ_b = 0 net-zero conclusion — rests on a dimensional inconsistency and on an omitted biomass-concentration factor. Correcting these errors changes the required volume ratio by orders of magnitude and undermines the headline claim. The abstract's assertion about all eight RL controllers is also contradicted by the reported DDPG run.

major comments (2)

[§IV, Eqs. (21), (23), (47)-(48) and Remark 3] The 625:1 ratio is dimensionally invalid. In the Monod balance (16), the substrate consumption term is ρ(S,I) X_ALG(t), so ρ(S,I) has units of µmol per µm^3 of biomass per day. Equation (21) defines ṁ_{2,3} = K_CO2 ρ(S,I) with those same units, i.e., per unit of biomass volume, not per unit of cultivation volume. Equation (23) subtracts ṁ_{2,3} from ṁ_{1,2} (mmol/L/d), and Eq. (47) multiplies ṁ_{2,3} by V_m alone; both omit the factor X_ALG(t). Remark 3's assertion that mmol/L/d and µmol/µm^3/d are equivalent is false: since 1 µm^3 = 10^-15 L, 1 µmol/µm^3 = 10^12 mmol/L, so the two units differ by twelve orders of magnitude. The number 625 is simply 175/0.28. If the steady-state biomass concentration X_ALG ≈ 50 µm^3/L from Fig. 3a is included, the required volume ratio becomes approximately 175,000/14 ≈ 12,500, not 625. Consequently, the λ_b = 0 net-zero conclusion in Section IV is not supported by the model as written.
[Abstract and §V, Table IV] The claim that all eight RL controllers increased carbon absorption is not supported by the reported data. The first DDPG run in Table IV shows r_e = 95.4 < r_s = 98.0, i.e., Δ = -2.6, and the text later notes that this run did not learn within the 200,000 time steps. With only a single run per algorithm (and three runs for DDPG), no statistical conclusion about the eight algorithms can be drawn. The abstract and Section V should either restrict the claim to the successful runs or report multi-seed results with uncertainty estimates before asserting that all eight controllers increased absorption.

minor comments (5)

[§IV, Remark 3] Instead of asking the reader to verify the unit equivalence, the remark should give the explicit conversion factor; as written, the claimed equivalence is false, and the surrounding text says the microalgae uptake is 'three orders of magnitude smaller' when 175/0.28 = 625, which is not three orders of magnitude.
[§III-C4, Eq. (23)] The variable m_2(t) in the atmosphere balance is never defined; please specify whether it is a mass, a molar amount, or a concentration, and include the volumes so that the balance can be checked dimensionally.
[§IV, Fig. 3a] The units of X_ALG are stated as µm^3/L, which is a volumetric fraction; please label the axis accordingly and comment on the conversion to biomass mass, since the value of approximately 50 µm^3/L may confuse readers.
[§V, Table IV] Table IV reports single runs except for DDPG; the authors acknowledge this in the text, but the abstract should not make a blanket claim without multi-seed statistics.
[§II-B] The TMN methodology is based heavily on the authors' own previous works [19], [44], [45]; please clarify explicitly what is new in the present network design beyond applying that methodology to the CO2 digester-microalgae case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 625:1 volume ratio is arithmetic from the paper's own steady-state values, and the finite-time controller proof is self-contained.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim, Vm = 625 Vd in Eq. (48), is not circular. It is obtained by substituting the steady-state values m_dot1,2 = 175 mmol/L/d and m_dot2,3 = 0.28 µmol/µm^3/d, read from the simulations in Figs. 3b and 3c, into the volume balance (47). That calculation is a direct consequence of the model and its parameters, not an assumption of the target result. The finite-time controller in Theorem 2 is proved from the stated Lyapunov conditions and does not rely on the volume-ratio result; it extends an existing theorem without importing the paper's conclusion. The RL comparison is empirical: the reward is set to the carbon uptake expression (20), so reporting that most controllers increased the reward is reporting the training outcome, not a prediction equivalent to the training goal. Self-citations [19], [21], [44], [45] are used for the TMN methodology, the baseline finite-time theorem, and the definition of circularity, but the net-zero conclusion lambda_b = 0 is obtained from the paper's own balance equations rather than from those citations alone. The paper does contain a serious dimensional and modeling problem: Remark 3's claim that mmol/L/d and µmol/µm^3/d are equivalent is false, and Eq. (21) omits the X_ALG factor that appears in Eq. (16), so the numerical value 625 is likely unsupported. However, a wrong or poorly posed calculation is not circular: the quantity was not assumed, fitted to the target, or defined in terms of the conclusion. No step in the derivation chain reduces by construction to its own input, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central carbon balance depends on the digester and microalgae model rates from prior literature plus two hand-picked constants, K_CO2 and fr. The most consequential premise is the false unit equivalence in Remark 3.

free parameters (2)

K_CO2 = 0.3
Chosen to fold respiration into a lower CO2 uptake fraction; directly scales the microalgae absorption term in eqs. (20)-(23) and hence the volume ratio.
fr = 0.15
Digester CO2 capture fraction; UK law implies fr <= 0.2, and the specific value 0.15 is selected for the numerical study and scales the emission rate m_dot12.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Anaerobic digestion model (4)-(9) from [61], [62] is an accurate description of the digester carbon dynamics.
The emission rate m_dot12(x) and the controller design both inherit this model.
domain assumption Monod microalgae model (15)-(18) with light and substrate as limiting factors describes growth and nutrient uptake.
The RL environment and uptake term (20) are built from this model.
ad hoc to paper The units of m_dot12 (mmol/L/d) and m_dot23 (µmol/µm^3/d) are equivalent, as stated in Remark 3.
This equivalence is asserted without proof and is incorrect by a factor of 10^12; it is required for the 625:1 volume ratio.
domain assumption The atmosphere can be modeled as a single well-mixed compartment whose CO2 mass balance is eq. (23).
Used to combine digester emission and algae uptake; the sink term omits the X_ALG factor present in (16).
domain assumption Virtual ducts of infinitesimal length (H to 0) have negligible effect on the flow.
Used in Section III-C-3 to couple the atmosphere directly to the digester and microalgae.
standard math Existence and invertibility conditions of Theorem 2 hold for the digester: G(x) invertible and a Lyapunov function V of the form (36) satisfies (27).
The controller (39) relies on these conditions; the paper does not verify G invertibility beyond assuming l = n.

invented entities (1)

Virtual duct compartments c4_1,2 and c5_2,3
purpose: Model CO2 transport from digester to atmosphere and from atmosphere to microalgae with infinitesimal length.
Introduced as modeling compartments in the TMN, not empirically validated as physical entities.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Circular Microalgae-Based Carbon Control for Net Zero." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VSN7JOAN

@misc{pith2026250202382,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Circular Microalgae-Based Carbon Control for Net Zero},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VSN7JOAN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02382}
}

read the original abstract

The alteration of the climate in various areas of the world is of increasing concern since climate stability is a necessary condition for human survival as well as every living organism. The main reason of climate change is the greenhouse effect caused by the accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. In this paper, we design a networked system underpinned by compartmental dynamical thermodynamics to circulate the atmospheric carbon dioxide. Specifically, in the carbon dioxide emitter compartment, we develop an initial-condition-dependent finite-time stabilizing controller that guarantees stability within a desired time leveraging the system property of affinity in the control. Then, to compensate for carbon emissions we show that a cultivation of microalgae with a volume 625 times bigger than the one of the carbon emitter is required. To increase the carbon uptake of the microalgae, we implement the nonaffine-in-the-control microalgae dynamical equations as an environment of a state-of-the-art library for reinforcement learning (RL), namely, Stable-Baselines3, and then, through the library, we test the performance of eight RL algorithms for training a controller that maximizes the microalgae absorption of carbon through the light intensity. All the eight controllers increased the carbon absorption of the cultivation during a training of 200,000 time steps with a maximum episode length of 200 time steps and with no termination conditions. This work is a first step towards approaching net zero as a classical and learning-based network control problem. The source code is publicly available.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02382 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Components of the state of c 1 1,1 vs. time with the initialcondition-dependent controller (Theorem 2). Fig. 3d, which depends on the adversarial interaction between the carbon digester outflow and the microalgae absorption (see (23)). Remark 3. The units used for m˙ 1,2 and m˙ 2,3 are those used by the references that developed the digester and the microalgae dynamical models as indicated in Table I. Specifically… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Dynamics of compartments c 2 2,2 , c 3 3,3 , c 4 1,2 , and c 5 2,3 using the values in Table I. TABLE II: RL problem set-up for microalgae control via light intensity I(t). Environment model Integration method δt States Observations Equations (15)-(18) Euler’s 0.00005 XALG(t), S(t) XALG(t), S(t) Actions Initial conditions Reward Max episode length Termination conditions I(t) Randomly sampled from uniform distributio… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

[1]

Economic losses and fatalities from weather- and climate-related events in Europe,

European Environment Agency, “Economic losses and fatalities from weather- and climate-related events in Europe,” last access: 4 August 2023. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/ economic-losses-and-fatalities-from

work page 2023
[2]

Seasonal influenza – Basic facts,

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, “Seasonal influenza – Basic facts,” last access: 4 August 2023. Available at: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/press/Press% 20Releases/071210_PR_Citizen_factsheet_flu.pdf

work page 2023
[3]

Vital signs – Global temperature,

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), “Vital signs – Global temperature,” last access: 4 August 2023. Available at: https: //climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

work page 2023
[4]

Increases in extreme precipitation over the Northeast United States using high-resolution climate model simulations,

B.-T. Jong, T. L. Delworth, W. F. Cooke, K.-C. Tseng, and H. Murakami, “Increases in extreme precipitation over the Northeast United States using high-resolution climate model simulations,” npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 18, 2023

work page 2023
[5]

Variability conceals emerg- ing trend in 100yr projections of UK local hourly rainfall extremes,

E. J. Kendon, E. M. Fischer, and C. J. Short, “Variability conceals emerg- ing trend in 100yr projections of UK local hourly rainfall extremes,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 1133, 2023

work page 2023
[6]

Increasing trends in regional heatwaves,

S. Perkins-Kirkpatrick and S. Lewis, “Increasing trends in regional heatwaves,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 3357, 2020

work page 2020
[7]

Future heat waves over the Mediterranean from an Euro-CORDEX regional climate model ensemble,

M. Molina, E. Sánchez, and C. Gutiérrez, “Future heat waves over the Mediterranean from an Euro-CORDEX regional climate model ensemble,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 8801, 2020

work page 2020
[8]

The point of no return for climate action: Effects of climate uncertainty and risk tolerance,

M. Aengenheyster, Q. Y . Feng, F. Van Der Ploeg, and H. A. Dijkstra, “The point of no return for climate action: Effects of climate uncertainty and risk tolerance,” Earth System Dynamics , vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1085– 1095, 2018

work page 2018

Show all 74 references

[9]

What is net zero?

University of Oxford, “What is net zero?” , last access: 1 January 2025. Available at: https://netzeroclimate.org/what-is-net-zero-2/

2025
[10]

2050 long-term strategy,

European Commission, “2050 long-term strategy,” , last access: 1 January 2025. Available at: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/ climate-strategies-targets/2050-long-term-strategy_en

2025
[11]

Circular economy,

United Nations, “Circular economy,” , last access: 1 January 2025. Available at: https://www.unepfi.org/pollution-and-circular-economy/ circular-economy/

2025
[12]

Circular economy action plan,

European Commission, “Circular economy action plan,” , last access: 1 January 2025. Available at: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/ circular-economy-action-plan_en

2025
[13]

What is a circular economy?

United States Environmental Protection Agency, “What is a circular economy?” , last access: 1 January 2025. Available at: https://www. epa.gov/circulareconomy/what-circular-economy

2025
[14]

Circular economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain,

J. Potting, M. P. Hekkert, E. Worrell, and A. Hanemaaijer, “Circular economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain,” Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving, no. 2544, 2017, policy report

2017
[15]

Circular economy strategies for mitigating critical material supply issues,

G. Gaustad, M. Krystofik, M. Bustamante, and K. Badami, “Circular economy strategies for mitigating critical material supply issues,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling , vol. 135, pp. 24–33, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S092...

2018
[16]

Critical raw materials,

European Commission, “Critical raw materials,” , last access: 1 January
[17]

W. M. Haddad, A Dynamical Systems Theory of Thermodynamics . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019

2019
[18]

Thermodynamics: The unique universal science,

——, “Thermodynamics: The unique universal science,” Entropy, vol. 19, no. 11, p. 621, 2017

2017
[19]

Thermodynami- cal material networks for modeling, planning, and control of circular ma- terial flows,

F. Zocco, P. Sopasakis, B. Smyth, and W. M. Haddad, “Thermodynami- cal material networks for modeling, planning, and control of circular ma- terial flows,” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering , vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023

2023
[20]

A unification be- tween deep-learning vision, compartmental dynamical thermodynamics, and robotic manipulation for a circular economy,

F. Zocco, W. M. Haddad, A. Corti, and M. Malvezzi, “A unification be- tween deep-learning vision, compartmental dynamical thermodynamics, and robotic manipulation for a circular economy,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 173 502–173 516, 2024

2024
[21]

Finite-time stabilization and optimal feedback control,

W. M. Haddad and A. L’Afflitto, “Finite-time stabilization and optimal feedback control,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1069–1074, 2015

2015
[22]

CO 2 mitigation with microalgae systems,

J. R. Benemann, “CO 2 mitigation with microalgae systems,” Energy Conversion and Management , vol. 38, pp. S475–S479, 1997

1997
[23]

An overview of carbon sequestration of green roofs in urban areas,

M. Shafique, X. Xue, and X. Luo, “An overview of carbon sequestration of green roofs in urban areas,” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening , vol. 47, p. 126515, 2020

2020
[24]

Is urban green space a carbon sink or source? - A case study of China based on LCA method,

Y . Zhang, W. Meng, H. Yun, W. Xu, B. Hu, M. He, X. Mo, and L. Zhang, “Is urban green space a carbon sink or source? - A case study of China based on LCA method,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 94, p. 106766, 2022

2022
[25]

Carbon dioxide sequestration model of a vertical greenery system,

M. Marchi, R. M. Pulselli, N. Marchettini, F. M. Pulselli, and S. Bas- tianoni, “Carbon dioxide sequestration model of a vertical greenery system,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 306, pp. 46–56, 2015

2015
[26]

Promoting sustainable carbon seques- tration of plants in urban greenspace by planting design: A case study in parks of Beijing,

Y . Wang, Q. Chang, and X. Li, “Promoting sustainable carbon seques- tration of plants in urban greenspace by planting design: A case study in parks of Beijing,” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening , vol. 64, p. 127291, 2021. 10

2021
[27]

Bio-mitigation of carbon dioxide using microalgal sys- tems: Advances and perspectives,

W. Zhou, J. Wang, P. Chen, C. Ji, Q. Kang, B. Lu, K. Li, J. Liu, and R. Ruan, “Bio-mitigation of carbon dioxide using microalgal sys- tems: Advances and perspectives,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 76, pp. 1163–1175, 2017

2017
[28]

Biomass of algae growth on natural water medium,

R. Ramaraj, D. D.-W. Tsai, and P. H. Chen, “Biomass of algae growth on natural water medium,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, vol. 142, pp. 124–128, 2015

2015
[29]

Integrated approach for carbon sequestration and wastewater treatment using algal–bacterial consortia: Opportunities and challenges,

S. Viswanaathan, P. K. Perumal, and S. Sundaram, “Integrated approach for carbon sequestration and wastewater treatment using algal–bacterial consortia: Opportunities and challenges,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1075, 2022

2022
[30]

Technical insights into the production of green fuel from CO 2 sequestered algal biomass: A conceptual review on green energy,

J. Arun, K. P. Gopinath, R. Sivaramakrishnan, P. SundarRajan, R. Mal- olan, and A. Pugazhendhi, “Technical insights into the production of green fuel from CO 2 sequestered algal biomass: A conceptual review on green energy,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 755, p. 142636, 2021

2021
[31]

Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable develop- ment: Linking theory and practice,

B. Suárez-Eiroa, E. Fernández, G. Méndez-Martínez, and D. Soto-Oñate, “Operational principles of circular economy for sustainable develop- ment: Linking theory and practice,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 214, pp. 952–961, 2019

2019
[32]

Algal biomass valorization for biofuel production and carbon sequestration: A review,

A. Sarwer, S. M. Hamed, A. I. Osman, F. Jamil, A. H. Al-Muhtaseb, N. S. Alhajeri, and D. W. Rooney, “Algal biomass valorization for biofuel production and carbon sequestration: A review,” Environmental Chemistry Letters, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 2797–2851, 2022

2022
[33]

What is a circular economy?

Ellen MacArthur Foundation, “What is a circular economy?” , last access: 1 January 2025. Available at: https://www. ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/ overview

2025
[34]

Life cycle assessment to tackle the take-make-waste paradigm in the textiles production,

V . Amicarelli, C. Bux, M. P. Spinelli, and G. Lagioia, “Life cycle assessment to tackle the take-make-waste paradigm in the textiles production,” Waste Management, vol. 151, pp. 10–27, 2022

2022
[35]

Life cycle assessment of bio-based and fossil-based plastic: A review,

S. Walker and R. Rothman, “Life cycle assessment of bio-based and fossil-based plastic: A review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 261, p. 121158, 2020

2020
[36]

A review of the life cycle assessment of electric vehicles: Considering the influence of batteries,

X. Xia and P. Li, “A review of the life cycle assessment of electric vehicles: Considering the influence of batteries,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 814, p. 152870, 2022

2022
[37]

Life cycle assess- ment of food systems,

S. Cucurachi, L. Scherer, J. Guinée, and A. Tukker, “Life cycle assess- ment of food systems,” One Earth, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 292–297, 2019

2019
[38]

The evolution of life cycle assessment in european policies over three decades,

S. Sala, A. M. Amadei, A. Beylot, and F. Ardente, “The evolution of life cycle assessment in european policies over three decades,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment , vol. 26, pp. 2295–2314, 2021

2021
[39]

Dynamic material flow analysis of plastics in China from 1950 to 2050,

X. Luan, X. Cui, L. Zhang, X. Chen, X. Li, X. Feng, L. Chen, W. Liu, and Z. Cui, “Dynamic material flow analysis of plastics in China from 1950 to 2050,” Journal of Cleaner Production , vol. 327, p. 129492, 2021

1950
[40]

Uncovering spatiotemporal evolution of titanium in China: A dynamic material flow analysis,

M. Li, Y . Geng, G. Liu, Z. Gao, X. Rui, and S. Xiao, “Uncovering spatiotemporal evolution of titanium in China: A dynamic material flow analysis,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling , vol. 180, p. 106166, 2022

2022
[41]

Dynamic probabilistic mate- rial flow analysis of rubber release from tires into the environment,

R. Sieber, D. Kawecki, and B. Nowack, “Dynamic probabilistic mate- rial flow analysis of rubber release from tires into the environment,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 258, p. 113573, 2020

2020
[42]

Dynamic material flow analysis of critical metals for lithium- ion battery system in China from 2000–2018,

W. Liu, W. Liu, X. Li, Y . Liu, A. E. Ogunmoroti, M. Li, M. Bi, and Z. Cui, “Dynamic material flow analysis of critical metals for lithium- ion battery system in China from 2000–2018,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 164, p. 105122, 2021

2000
[43]

Dynamic material flow analysis of PET, PE, and PP flows in Europe: Evaluation of the potential for circular economy,

M. K. Eriksen, K. Pivnenko, G. Faraca, A. Boldrin, and T. F. Astrup, “Dynamic material flow analysis of PET, PE, and PP flows in Europe: Evaluation of the potential for circular economy,”Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 54, no. 24, pp. 16 166–16 175, 2020

2020
[44]

Circularity of thermodynamical material networks: Indicators, examples, and algorithms,

F. Zocco, “Circularity of thermodynamical material networks: Indicators, examples, and algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.15051 , 2024

2024
[45]

Circular economy design through system dynamics modeling,

F. Zocco and M. Malvezzi, “Circular economy design through system dynamics modeling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13540 , 2024

2024 arXiv
[46]

On finite stability in control systems,

E. Roxin, “On finite stability in control systems,” Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 273–282, 1966

1966
[47]

Finite time stability conditions for non-autonomous continuous systems,

E. Moulay and W. Perruquetti, “Finite time stability conditions for non-autonomous continuous systems,” International Journal of Control, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 797–803, 2008

2008
[48]

Finite-time stability for time-varying nonlinear dynamical systems,

W. M. Haddad, S. G. Nersesov, and L. Du, “Finite-time stability for time-varying nonlinear dynamical systems,” in 2008 American control conference. IEEE, 2008, pp. 4135–4139

2008
[49]

Continuous finite-time stabilization of the translational and rotational double integrators,

S. P. Bhat and D. S. Bernstein, “Continuous finite-time stabilization of the translational and rotational double integrators,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 678–682, 1998

1998
[50]

On an output feedback finite-time stabilization problem,

Y . Hong, J. Huang, and Y . Xu, “On an output feedback finite-time stabilization problem,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 305–309, 2001

2001
[51]

Finite-time stabilization and optimal feed- back control for nonlinear discrete-time systems,

W. M. Haddad and J. Lee, “Finite-time stabilization and optimal feed- back control for nonlinear discrete-time systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1685–1691, 2023

2023
[52]

Finite time stability and optimal finite time stabilization for discrete-time stochastic dynamical systems,

J. Lee, W. M. Haddad, and M. Lanchares, “Finite time stability and optimal finite time stabilization for discrete-time stochastic dynamical systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 3978–3991, 2023

2023
[53]

Trust region policy optimization,

J. Schulman, S. Levine, P. Abbeel, M. Jordan, and P. Moritz, “Trust region policy optimization,” in Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning , 2015, pp. 1889–1897

2015
[54]

Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning,

V . Mnih, A. P. Badia, M. Mirza, A. Graves, T. Harley, T. P. Lil- licrap, D. Silver, and K. Kavukcuoglu, “Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning,” in Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 48 , 2016, pp. 1928–1937

2016
[55]

Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning,

T. P. Lillicrap, J. J. Hunt, A. Pritzel, N. Heess, T. Erez, Y . Tassa, D. Silver, and D. Wierstra, “Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning,” 2015. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.02971

2015 arXiv
[56]

Prox- imal policy optimization algorithms,

J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, and O. Klimov, “Prox- imal policy optimization algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017

2017 arXiv
[57]

Simple random search of static linear policies is competitive for reinforcement learning,

H. Mania, A. Guy, and B. Recht, “Simple random search of static linear policies is competitive for reinforcement learning,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2018) , vol. 31, 2018, pp. 1–10. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_...

2018
[58]

CrossQ: Batch normalization in deep rein- forcement learning for greater sample efficiency and simplicity,

A. Bhatt, D. Palenicek, B. Belousov, M. Argus, A. Amiranashvili, T. Brox, and J. Peters, “CrossQ: Batch normalization in deep rein- forcement learning for greater sample efficiency and simplicity,” in The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024)...

2024
[59]

Fixed- time learning for optimal feedback control,

N.-M. T. Kokolakis, K. G. Vamvoudakis, and W. M. Haddad, “Fixed- time learning for optimal feedback control,” in International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 87387. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2023

2023
[60]

A definition of continual reinforcement learning,

D. Abel, A. Barreto, B. Van Roy, D. Precup, H. P. van Hasselt, and S. Singh, “A definition of continual reinforcement learning,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 36, 2024

2024
[61]

Dynamical model development and parameter identification for an anaerobic wastewater treatment process,

O. Bernard, Z. Hadj-Sadok, D. Dochain, A. Genovesi, and J.-P. Steyer, “Dynamical model development and parameter identification for an anaerobic wastewater treatment process,” Biotechnology and Bioengi- neering, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 424–438, 2001

2001
[62]

Hybrid cascade control for a class of nonlinear dynamical systems,

A. Campos-Rodríguez, J. García-Sandoval, V . González-Álvarez, and A. González-Álvarez, “Hybrid cascade control for a class of nonlinear dynamical systems,” Journal of Process Control , vol. 76, pp. 141–154, 2019

2019
[63]

Treating, storing, and using carbon dioxide from anaerobic digestion: RPS 255,

UK Environment Agency, “Treating, storing, and using carbon dioxide from anaerobic digestion: RPS 255,” last access: 13 July 2023 . [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ treating-storing-and-using-carbon-dioxide-from-anaerobic-digestion-rps-255/ trea...

2023
[64]

Experiment selection for the discrimination of semi-quantitative models of dynamical systems,

I. Vatcheva, H. De Jong, O. Bernard, and N. J. Mars, “Experiment selection for the discrimination of semi-quantitative models of dynamical systems,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 170, no. 4-5, pp. 472–506, 2006

2006
[65]

Output feedback adaptive extremum seeking control of a continuous stirred tank bioreactor with Monod’s kinetics,

N. Marcos, M. Guay, and D. Dochain, “Output feedback adaptive extremum seeking control of a continuous stirred tank bioreactor with Monod’s kinetics,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 807– 818, 2004

2004
[66]

New mechanistic model to simulate microalgae growth,

A. Solimeno, R. Samsó, E. Uggetti, B. Sialve, J.-P. Steyer, A. Gabarró, and J. García, “New mechanistic model to simulate microalgae growth,” Algal Research, vol. 12, pp. 350–358, 2015

2015
[67]

Hurdles and challenges for modelling and control of microalgae for CO2 mitigation and biofuel production,

O. Bernard, “Hurdles and challenges for modelling and control of microalgae for CO2 mitigation and biofuel production,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1378–1389, 2011

2011
[68]

D. O. Hall and K. Rao, Photosynthesis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1999

1999
[69]

Pho- tosynthesis under artificial light: The shift in primary and secondary metabolism,

E. Darko, P. Heydarizadeh, B. Schoefs, and M. R. Sabzalian, “Pho- tosynthesis under artificial light: The shift in primary and secondary metabolism,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Bio- logical Sciences, vol. 369, no. 1640, p. 20130243, 2014

2014
[70]

Stable-Baselines3: Reliable reinforcement learning implementations,

A. Raffin, A. Hill, A. Gleave, A. Kanervisto, M. Ernestus, and N. Dormann, “Stable-Baselines3: Reliable reinforcement learning implementations,” Journal of Machine Learning Research , vol. 22, 11 no. 268, pp. 1–8, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://jmlr.org/papers/v22/ 20-1364.html

2021
[71]

Soft actor-critic: Off- policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor,

T. Haarnoja, A. Zhou, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, “Soft actor-critic: Off- policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor,” in International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2018, pp. 1861–1870

2018
[72]

Controlling overestimation bias with truncated mixture of continuous distributional quantile critics,

A. Kuznetsov, P. Shvechikov, A. Grishin, and D. Vetrov, “Controlling overestimation bias with truncated mixture of continuous distributional quantile critics,” in International Conference on Machine Learning . PMLR, 2020, pp. 5556–5566

2020
[73]

Explainable reinforcement learning: A survey and comparative review,

S. Milani, N. Topin, M. Veloso, and F. Fang, “Explainable reinforcement learning: A survey and comparative review,” ACM Computing Surveys , vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1–36, 2024

2024
[2025]

Available at: https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/ raw-materials/areas-specific-interest/critical-raw-materials_en

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Economic losses and fatalities from weather- and climate-related events in Europe,

European Environment Agency, “Economic losses and fatalities from weather- and climate-related events in Europe,” last access: 4 August 2023. Available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/ economic-losses-and-fatalities-from

work page 2023

[2] [2]

Seasonal influenza – Basic facts,

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, “Seasonal influenza – Basic facts,” last access: 4 August 2023. Available at: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/press/Press% 20Releases/071210_PR_Citizen_factsheet_flu.pdf

work page 2023

[3] [3]

Vital signs – Global temperature,

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), “Vital signs – Global temperature,” last access: 4 August 2023. Available at: https: //climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

work page 2023

[4] [4]

Increases in extreme precipitation over the Northeast United States using high-resolution climate model simulations,

B.-T. Jong, T. L. Delworth, W. F. Cooke, K.-C. Tseng, and H. Murakami, “Increases in extreme precipitation over the Northeast United States using high-resolution climate model simulations,” npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 18, 2023

work page 2023

[5] [5]

Variability conceals emerg- ing trend in 100yr projections of UK local hourly rainfall extremes,

E. J. Kendon, E. M. Fischer, and C. J. Short, “Variability conceals emerg- ing trend in 100yr projections of UK local hourly rainfall extremes,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 1133, 2023

work page 2023

[6] [6]

Increasing trends in regional heatwaves,

S. Perkins-Kirkpatrick and S. Lewis, “Increasing trends in regional heatwaves,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 3357, 2020

work page 2020

[7] [7]

Future heat waves over the Mediterranean from an Euro-CORDEX regional climate model ensemble,

M. Molina, E. Sánchez, and C. Gutiérrez, “Future heat waves over the Mediterranean from an Euro-CORDEX regional climate model ensemble,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 8801, 2020

work page 2020

[8] [8]

The point of no return for climate action: Effects of climate uncertainty and risk tolerance,

M. Aengenheyster, Q. Y . Feng, F. Van Der Ploeg, and H. A. Dijkstra, “The point of no return for climate action: Effects of climate uncertainty and risk tolerance,” Earth System Dynamics , vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1085– 1095, 2018

work page 2018