Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

QLASS: Boosting Language Agent Inference via Q-Guided Stepwise Search

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.02584 v1 pith:WCHC7N4J submitted 2025-02-04 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords languageqlassagentsstepwiseagentguidanceinferencemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language agents have become a promising solution to complex interactive tasks. One of the key ingredients to the success of language agents is the reward model on the trajectory of the agentic workflow, which provides valuable guidance during training or inference. However, due to the lack of annotations of intermediate interactions, most existing works use an outcome reward model to optimize policies across entire trajectories. This may lead to sub-optimal policies and hinder the overall performance. To address this, we propose QLASS (Q-guided Language Agent Stepwise Search), to automatically generate annotations by estimating Q-values in a stepwise manner for open language agents. By introducing a reasoning tree and performing process reward modeling, QLASS provides effective intermediate guidance for each step. With the stepwise guidance, we propose a Q-guided generation strategy to enable language agents to better adapt to long-term value, resulting in significant performance improvement during model inference on complex interactive agent tasks. Notably, even with almost half the annotated data, QLASS retains strong performance, demonstrating its efficiency in handling limited supervision. We also empirically demonstrate that QLASS can lead to more effective decision making through qualitative analysis. We will release our code and data.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SAND: Boosting LLM Agents with Self-Taught Action Deliberation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A self-training framework that uses self-consistency action sampling and execution-guided critiques to teach LLM agents to explicitly deliberate over candidate actions, improving average rewards by about 20% over supe...

  2. Unleashing Embodied Task Planning Ability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 7B LLM trained with sparse completion rewards and a GRPO-style algorithm reaches state-of-the-art on ALFWorld and ScienceWorld.

  3. Agent-RewardBench: Towards a Unified Benchmark for Reward Modeling across Perception, Planning, and Safety in Real-World Multimodal Agents

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new step-level reward-modeling benchmark for multimodal agents shows current MLLMs reach at most 61.6 percent accuracy, and benchmark score correlates strongly (r=0.981 across five models) with downstream A* search ...

  4. Toward Efficient Agents: Memory, Tool learning, and Planning

    cs.AI 2026-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes efficiency techniques for LLM agents into memory, tool learning, and planning, and consolidates benchmarks and metrics for measuring cost-performance trade-offs.

Pith tools