Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 2 cited by

Love numbers of black p-branes: fine tuning, Love symmetries, and their geometrization

T0 review · 1 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The vanishing of black p-brane Love numbers is a symmetry selection rule, not an accident.

desk verdict Valuable extension of Love symmetries to p-branes with clean exact vanishings; the no-geometrization claim for p>1 is slightly over-stated but not damaging. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02694 v1 pith:AC55NK2Y submitted 2025-02-04 hep-th gr-qc

Panagiotis Charalambous , Sergei Dubovsky , Mikhail M. Ivanov This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc PACS 04.70.-s04.50.-h11.25.-w
keywords blackp-branesLovenumberssymmetrynear-zonesymmetriesgeometrizationnear-horizonisometriesscalarperturbationsAdS/CFT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that the vanishing and running of static scalar Love numbers of non-dilatonic black p-branes are dictated by hidden near-zone Love symmetries, not by coincidence. For non-extremal branes the response is governed by a generalized multipole $\hat{\ell} = \ell/(D-3-p)$: Love numbers vanish exactly when $\hat{\ell}$ is an integer, run logarithmically when it is half-integer, and take generic constants otherwise. The paper identifies the symmetries responsible: $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ for all $p$, enlarged to $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ for black strings ($p=1$). For $p=0,1$ these symmetries become genuine isometries of the near-horizon Schwarzschild-AdS$_{p+2}$ geometry in a near-extremal limit, a process the authors call geometrization, while for $p>1$ a no-go theorem forbids any geometric limit. The paper also proves that extremal p-branes have exactly zero static Love numbers for every multipole and spacetime dimension.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the near-zone Love symmetry: a set of vector fields that act on perturbation equations rather than on the background metric, with a Casimir operator that reproduces the leading near-zone radial operator. For black strings this symmetry is the two-dimensional conformal algebra $SO(2,2;\mathbb{R})\simeq SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})$, the isometry algebra of AdS$_3$; for all other $p$ it is a single $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$. The argument works by placing the static homogeneous mode in a highest-weight representation, whose annihilation property forces the perturbation to be a pure polynomial with no decaying response, and by identifying the near-zone operator with the near-extremal near-horizon wave operator, whose Casimir for $p=0,1$ is the Casimir of an actual isometry group of SAdS$_{p+2}\simeq$ AdS$_{p+2}$.

What would settle it

A direct numerical solution of the exact static Klein-Gordon equation for a non-dilatonic black p-brane with $p=2$ and $\ell=1$ (so $\hat{\ell}=1/2$) in, say, $D=6$, checking whether the ratio of decaying to growing large-radius coefficients is exactly the predicted logarithmically running response, would confirm or refute the fine-tuning claim at non-integer $\hat{\ell}$; likewise, computing the $O(k_\perp^2 r_+^2)$ correction to the response of an extremal $p=2$ brane would test whether the all-$\ell$ zero result survives beyond leading order.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the intricate pattern of scalar Love numbers of non-dilatonic black p-branes follows from highest-weight representations of near-zone Love symmetries. In the near-zone region, the perturbation equations admit an $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ symmetry for $p=0$ and $p\ge 2$, and an $SO(2,2;\mathbb{R})\simeq SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ symmetry for $p=1$; the static homogeneous perturbation is a highest-weight primary or descendant precisely when $\hat{\ell}$ is an integer, forcing the response coefficient to vanish. For $p=0$ and $p=1$, the Love symmetry generators coincide with Killing vectors of the near-extremal near-horizon geometry, whose SAdS$_{p+2}$ factor is locally equivalent to pure AdS$_{p+2}$; this geometrization fails for $p\ge 2$, where SAdS$_{p+2}$ is not diffeomorphic to AdS$_{p+2}$. At extremality, the near-horizon AdS$_{d+1}$ isometries make the static and light-like response vanish for all $\ell$, not only for integer $\hat{\ell}$, so extremal p-branes are exactly rigid under scalar tidal forcing.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's identification of which part of the scalar profile is the response relies on analytically continuing the generalized multipole $\hat{\ell}$ to separate source from response in the world-volume effective theory; if that scheme is not the correct physical definition for p-branes, the claimed values at generic and half-integer $\hat{\ell}$ shift, although the integer-$\hat{\ell}$ vanishings are exact properties of the perturbation equations and would survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the symmetry explanation is correct, the vanishing of integer-$\hat{\ell}$ static Love numbers for all non-dilatonic black p-branes is no longer a fine-tuning puzzle in the world-volume effective field theory.
  • The black string Love symmetry predicts a quasinormal-mode spectrum $\omega_n^{(\pm)} = \pm k - i4\pi T_H(n-\hat{\ell})$, matching the BTZ/AdS$_3$ form for the near-horizon geometry.
  • Geometrization is possible exactly when the near-horizon factor is AdS$_2$ or AdS$_3$; for $p\ge 2$ the Love symmetry remains hidden forever and cannot be interpreted as a background isometry in any limit.
  • Extremal p-branes, unlike non-extremal ones, have exactly zero static scalar Love numbers for every multipole and dimension, a rigidity that extends to perturbations with light-like dispersion relations.
  • For $p\ge 2$, brane-inhomogeneous perturbations admit no full near-zone Love symmetry; only the reduced homogeneous $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ survives, so the complete conformal structure of lower codimensions is special.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The no-go theorem suggests a broader criterion: a hidden near-zone symmetry can become geometric only when the near-horizon factor is two- or three-dimensional AdS, because only then does constant-curvature maximal symmetry coexist with a non-degenerate horizon; this could be tested against rotating black holes whose near-horizon geometry is not SAdS$_2$.
  • The exact zero of extremal Love numbers for all $\ell$ is reminiscent of a Meissner effect for scalar fields, and if it persists in a holographic dual it would imply that extremal branes are exactly rigid under scalar tidal forcing, a sharp prediction for boundary conformal field theories.
  • A concrete next-order test is the $O(k_\perp^2 r_+^2)$ correction to the extremal p-brane response, which the paper leaves open; a nonzero value there would delimit how rigid the extremal throat really is beyond the leading near-horizon approximation.
  • Because homogeneous p-brane perturbations reduce to those of a $(D-p)$-dimensional Reissner-Nordström black hole, the full phenomenology of higher-dimensional black hole Love numbers transfers directly to extended branes; this dictionary is used in the paper but could be pushed further to rotating p-branes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper computes the static scalar response coefficients (Love numbers) of non-dilatonic black p-branes in higher-dimensional supergravity and explains their structure by near-zone "Love symmetries." For non-extremal branes, the static and brane-homogeneous scalar Love numbers vanish when the generalized multipole ℓ̂ = ℓ/(D−3−p) is an integer, run logarithmically at half-integer values, and are generic otherwise. The authors identify the near-zone symmetry as SL(2,ℝ) for p=0, SL(2,ℝ)×SL(2,ℝ) for p=1, and only a homogeneous SL(2,ℝ) for p≥2. For p=0,1 they show that this symmetry coincides with the isometries of the near-horizon SAdS_{p+2} or AdS_{p+2} geometry in the near-extremal and extremal limits, a process they call geometrization; for p>1 they argue that no geometrization occurs. The paper also proves that extremal p-branes have exactly vanishing static scalar Love numbers for all multipoles and dimensions. The main vanishings are supported by exact statements for static and homogeneous perturbations and by explicit hypergeometric near-zone solutions.

Significance. If correct, this paper provides a systematic explanation of the fine-tuning of p-brane Love numbers and sharpens the relation between hidden conformal symmetries and background isometries. The exact results for static and homogeneous modes, the explicit near-zone response coefficients, and the identification of a new SL(2,ℝ)×SL(2,ℝ) Love symmetry for black strings are valuable and likely to be influential. The paper is also careful to separate exact statements from leading-order near-zone approximations and to state the analytic-continuation scheme used in the matching. The main reservation concerns the strength of the universal "no geometrization" claim for p≥2, which is argued more strongly than the provided proofs support.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 5.6 and Section 5.3 (Eq. (5.22))] The no-go theorem in Section 5.6 rules out that the (t,x,r) submanifold of a non-degenerate p-brane metric with p≥2 is maximally symmetric, i.e., that SAdS_{p+2} is locally AdS_{p+2}. However, the Love symmetry that actually exists for p≥2 is only the homogeneous SL(2,ℝ) of Section 4.5, not the full SO(p+1,2). The theorem therefore does not by itself exclude the possibility that this smaller SL(2,ℝ) arises as an isometry group in some limit. Section 5.3 checks only the extremal NHE contraction, showing that the contracted vector fields ζ^hom preserve only the tilde-y tilde-y metric component (Eq. (5.22)); Section 5.4 addresses only the standard NNHE (Maldacena) scaling. No argument is given that rules out other scalings or effective-geometry limits in which the homogeneous SL(2,ℝ) becomes geometric. Consequently the universal statement "geometrization happens in no limit for p>1" (Section 2 item 6, and the abstract) is stronger than what is proven. I recommend either qualifying the claim to the NNHE and extremal NHE limits or supplying an argument that covers all possible limits.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The word "revels" should be "reveals."
  2. [Section 4.3, after Eq. (4.35)] The sentence "These are exactly what want to match onto the world-volume EFT" is missing a word; it should read "what we want to match."
  3. [Section 5, introductory paragraph] The phrase "We will will furthermore contrast" contains a duplicated "will."
  4. [Section 5.2, final paragraph] The word "trasnverse frequency" should be "transverse frequency."
  5. [Sections 3.4 and 5.3] The phrase "Winger-like contraction" should be "Wigner-like contraction."
  6. [Section 5.5] In the sentence "there is an extra factor of 2 in the dumping parameter," "dumping" should be "damping."
  7. [Section 2] The paper should state more prominently that the classification of Love numbers as zero, running, or generic for non-integer ℓ̂ depends on the analytic-continuation scheme used to separate source from response; this scheme-dependence is acknowledged in footnotes but is not reflected in the summary of results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity: Love symmetries are constructed from the explicit near-zone operators and the vanishing selection rules follow from highest-weight representations; the p>1 no-geometrization concern is a logical-strength gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The static and homogeneous scalar Love numbers are computed from explicit hypergeometric solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation in the p-brane background (Eqs. 4.41-4.47), giving k_Love(0,0) proportional to tan(pi * ell-hat). The apparent fine-tuning is then explained by constructing the Love symmetry generators explicitly (Eqs. 4.48-4.50 for p=1 and Eqs. 4.64 for p>=2) and verifying that their Casimir equals the near-zone radial operator (Eqs. 4.52 and 4.66). The vanishing at integer ell-hat follows from the highest-weight condition on the static homogeneous mode, which is an algebraic statement about the already-derived solution, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. For p=0,1 the geometrization claim is supported by an explicit equality between the near-zone Love generators and the NNHE Killing vectors (Eqs. 5.45-5.47 compared with Eqs. 4.48-4.51), so the symmetry is not imported by assumption. The no-go theorem in Section 5.6 is an independent curvature computation: it shows that the (t,x,r) submanifold of a generic p-brane metric cannot be maximally symmetric with a non-degenerate horizon for p>=2. The skeptical concern that this only rules out full AdS isometries, not the smaller SL(2,R) that actually constitutes the p>1 Love symmetry, is a legitimate scope-of-proof issue about the broad 'no geometrization' conclusion, but it is not a circularity: the theorem does not assume the Love symmetry it is used to interpret. Self-citations to the authors' earlier Love-symmetry papers [23,43,44] provide context and the original black-hole result, which is rederived in Section 3.4, so they are not load-bearing. Overall, no step reduces by definition or by self-citation to its own output.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computations depend on standard supergravity backgrounds and EFT matching schemes, not on fitted parameters. No free parameters are introduced; the only scheme-choice-like input is the analytic continuation used to define Love numbers, which does not affect the integer-multipole vanishings. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities are introduced; the Love symmetry is a symmetry, not an entity, and the NNHE geometry is an auxiliary effective geometry.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The non-dilatonic black p-brane metric (4.6) solves the action (4.2)-(4.4) and is a valid classical background.
    The entire response computation uses this geometry; the solution is imported from Refs [87-92] and not re-derived.
  • domain assumption World-volume EFT with Wilson coefficients lambda_l equals the low-energy description of the brane, and Newtonian matching extracts them from Klein-Gordon asymptotics.
    Section 4.2-4.3 defines Love numbers via this EFT and matching; if the EFT misses relevant operators, the interpretation of the computed coefficients as Love numbers changes.
  • ad hoc to paper Analytic continuation of the generalized multipole (or of the spacetime dimension) is used to separate source from response in the matching.
    Eqs (4.35)-(4.44) adopt the scheme of Refs [19-23,78,79]; non-integer multipole values are scheme-dependent, while the integer-multipole vanishings are invariant.
  • domain assumption The near-zone operator truncation (4.38)-(4.39) is exact on static and homogeneous modes, so near-zone symmetries constrain the exact asymptotic response.
    The paper verifies this exactness for the scalar Klein-Gordon equation; the whole symmetry explanation of the vanishings relies on it.
  • domain assumption The NNHE geometry (5.34) is the effective background that reproduces the near-zone equations of motion for the Love symmetry.
    Used in Sections 5.4-5.6 to identify the Love symmetry with isometries; it is an auxiliary subtracted geometry, not the physical brane geometry.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Love numbers of black p-branes: fine tuning, Love symmetries, and their geometrization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AC55NK2Y

@misc{pith2026250202694,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Love numbers of black p-branes: fine tuning, Love symmetries, and their geometrization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AC55NK2Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02694}
}
abstract

We compute scalar static response coefficients (Love numbers) of non-dilatonic black $p$-brane solutions in higher dimensional supergravity. This calculation revels a fine-tuning behavior similar to that of higher dimensional black holes, which we explain by ``hidden'' near-zone Love symmetries. In general, these symmetries act on equations for perturbations but they are not background isometries. The Love symmetry of charged $p=0$ branes is described by the usual $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ algebra. For $p=1$ the Love symmetry has an algebraic structure $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})$. The $p=0,1$ Love symmetries reduce to isometries of the near-horizon Schwarzschild-AdS$_{p+2}$ metric in the near-extremal finite temperature limit. They further reduce to the AdS$_{p+2}$ isometries in the extremal zero-temperature limit. We call this process geometrization. In contrast, for the $p>1$ cases, the Love symmetry is always an $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$, and there is no limit in which it becomes geometric. We interpret geometrization and its absence as a consequence of the local equivalence between the Schwarzschild-AdS$_{p+2}$ and pure AdS$_{p+2}$ spaces for $p=0,1$, which does not hold for $p>1$. We also show that the static Love numbers of extremal $p$-branes are always zero regardless of spacetime dimensionality, which contrasts starkly with the non-extremal case. Overall, our results suggest that the Love symmetry is hidden by nature, and it can acquire a geometric meaning only if the background has an AdS$_{2}$ or AdS$_{3}$ limit.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dynamical Love Numbers for Black Holes and Beyond from Shell Effective Field Theory

    hep-th 2025-12 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    A shell-based EFT computes scalar Love numbers for Schwarzschild black holes through O(G^9) and conjectures an all-orders Riemann-zeta structure.

  2. Dynamical Tidal Response of Schwarzschild Black Holes

    gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The dynamical Love numbers of a Schwarzschild black hole are nonzero at quadratic order in frequency, run logarithmically with a coefficient set by dissipation, and are now matched including their finite, scheme-depen...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al.,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116 (2016) 061102 [1602.03837]

    arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al.,GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119 (2017) 161101 [1710.05832]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Chatziioannou,Neutron-star tidal deformability and equation-of-state constraints, General Relativity and Gravitation52 (2020) 109

    K. Chatziioannou,Neutron-star tidal deformability and equation-of-state constraints, General Relativity and Gravitation52 (2020) 109

    2020

  4. [4]

    H. S. Chia, Z. Zhou and M. M. Ivanov,Bring the Heat: Tidal Heating Constraints for Black Holes and Exotic Compact Objects from the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Data, 2404.14641

    arXiv

  5. [5]

    Cardoso, E

    V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani and G. Raposo,Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 084014 [1701.01116]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Franzin, V

    E. Franzin, V. Cardoso, P. Pani and G. Raposo,Testing strong gravity with gravitational waves and Love numbers, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.841 (2017) 012035

    2017

  7. [7]

    Cardoso, M

    V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli and L. Senatore,Black Holes in an Effective Field Theory Extension of General Relativity, Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 251105 [1808.08962]

    arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Katagiri, H

    T. Katagiri, H. Nakano and K. Omukai,Stability of relativistic tidal response against small potential modification, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 084049 [2304.04551]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 125 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Xie, D. Chatterjee, G. Holder, D. E. Holz, S. Perkins, K. Yagi et al.,Breaking bad degeneracies with Love relations: Improving gravitational-wave measurements through universal relations, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 043010 [2210.09386]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes,I-Love-Q, Science 341 (2013) 365 [1302.4499]

    2013 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes,I-Love-Q Relations in Neutron Stars and their Applications to Astrophysics, Gravitational Waves and Fundamental Physics, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 023009 [1303.1528]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Pani,I-Love-Q relations for gravastars and the approach to the black-hole limit, Phys

    P. Pani,I-Love-Q relations for gravastars and the approach to the black-hole limit, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 124030 [1506.06050]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes,Binary Love Relations, Class. Quant. Grav.33 (2016) 13LT01 [1512.02639]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Uchikata, S

    N. Uchikata, S. Yoshida and P. Pani,Tidal deformability and I-Love-Q relations for gravastars with polytropic thin shells, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 064015 [1607.03593]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes,Approximate Universal Relations among Tidal Parameters for Neutron Star Binaries, Class. Quant. Grav.34 (2017) 015006 [1608.06187]

    2017 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Fang and G

    H. Fang and G. Lovelace,Tidal coupling of a Schwarzschild black hole and – 50 – circularly orbiting moon, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 124016 [gr-qc/0505156]

    2005 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Damour and A

    T. Damour and A. Nagar,Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 084035 [0906.0096]

    2009 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Binnington and E

    T. Binnington and E. Poisson,Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 084018 [0906.1366]

    2009 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Kol and M

    B. Kol and M. Smolkin,Black hole stereotyping: Induced gravito-static polarization, JHEP 02 (2012) 010 [1110.3764]

    2012 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Le Tiec and M

    A. Le Tiec and M. Casals,Spinning Black Holes Fall in Love, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 131102 [2007.00214]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    H. S. Chia,Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 024013 [2010.07300]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Le Tiec, M

    A. Le Tiec, M. Casals and E. Franzin,Tidal Love Numbers of Kerr Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 084021 [2010.15795]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Charalambous, S

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky and M. M. Ivanov,On the Vanishing of Love Numbers for Kerr Black Holes, JHEP 05 (2021) 038 [2102.08917]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    De Luca and P

    V. De Luca and P. Pani,Tidal deformability of dressed black holes and tests of ultralight bosons in extended mass ranges, JCAP 08 (2021) 032 [2106.14428]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    De Luca, A

    V. De Luca, A. Maselli and P. Pani,Modeling frequency-dependent tidal deformability for environmental black hole mergers, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 044058 [2212.03343]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Pani and A

    P. Pani and A. Maselli,Love in Extrema Ratio, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28 (2019) 1944001 [1905.03947]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Datta, R

    S. Datta, R. Brito, S. Bose, P. Pani and S. A. Hughes,Tidal heating as a discriminator for horizons in extreme mass ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 044004 [1910.07841]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Chakrabarti, T

    S. Chakrabarti, T. Delsate and J. Steinhoff,New perspectives on neutron star and black hole spectroscopy and dynamic tides, 1304.2228

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    M. V. S. Saketh, Z. Zhou and M. M. Ivanov,Dynamical tidal response of Kerr black holes from scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 064058 [2307.10391]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and Z. Zhou,Gravitational Raman Scattering in Effective Field Theory: A Scalar Tidal Matching at O(G3), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 131401 [2401.08752]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Gürlebeck,No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments, Phys

    N. Gürlebeck,No-hair theorem for Black Holes in Astrophysical Environments, Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 151102 [1503.03240]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [32]

    De Luca, J

    V. De Luca, J. Khoury and S. S. C. Wong,Nonlinearities in the tidal Love numbers of black holes, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 024048 [2305.14444]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    M. M. Riva, L. Santoni, N. Savić and F. Vernizzi,Vanishing of nonlinear tidal Love – 51 – numbers of Schwarzschild black holes, Phys. Lett. B854 (2024) 138710 [2312.05065]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, L

    O. Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, L. Hui, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon and S. S. C. Wong,Symmetries of Vanishing Nonlinear Love Numbers of Schwarzschild Black Holes, 2410.10952

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Kehagias and A

    A. Kehagias and A. Riotto,Black Holes in a Gravitational Field: The Non-linear Static Love Number of Schwarzschild Black Holes Vanishes, 2410.11014

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Iteanu, M

    S. Iteanu, M. M. Riva, L. Santoni, N. Savić and F. Vernizzi,Vanishing of Quadratic Love Numbers of Schwarzschild Black Holes, 2410.03542

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein,An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 104029 [hep-th/0409156]

    2006 arXiv

  30. [38]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein,Dissipative effects in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 104030 [hep-th/0511133]

    2006 arXiv

  31. [39]

    R. A. Porto,Post-Newtonian corrections to the motion of spinning bodies in NRGR, Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 104031 [gr-qc/0511061]

    2006 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Levi and J

    M. Levi and J. Steinhoff,Spinning gravitating objects in the effective field theory in the post-Newtonian scheme, JHEP 09 (2015) 219 [1501.04956]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    R. A. Porto,The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics, Phys. Rept. 633 (2016) 1 [1601.04914]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Levi,Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review, Rept

    M. Levi,Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review, Rept. Prog. Phys.83 (2020) 075901 [1807.01699]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Charalambous, S

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky and M. M. Ivanov,Hidden Symmetry of Vanishing Love Numbers, Phys. Rev. Lett.127 (2021) 101101 [2103.01234]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Charalambous, S

    P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky and M. M. Ivanov,Love symmetry, JHEP 10 (2022) 175 [2209.02091]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni and A. R. Solomon,Ladder symmetries of black holes. Implications for Love numbers and no-hair theorems, JCAP 01 (2022) 032 [2105.01069]

    2022 arXiv

  38. [46]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni and A. R. Solomon,Near-zone symmetries of Kerr black holes, JHEP 09 (2022) 049 [2203.08832]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    J. B. Achour and E. R. Livine,Symmetries and conformal bridge in Schwarschild-(A)dS black hole mechanics, JHEP 12 (2021) 152 [2110.01455]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Ben Achour, E

    J. Ben Achour, E. R. Livine, S. Mukohyama and J.-P. Uzan,Hidden symmetry of the static response of black holes: applications to Love numbers, JHEP 07 (2022) 112 [2202.12828]

    2022 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Ben Achour, E

    J. Ben Achour, E. R. Livine, D. Oriti and G. Piani,Schrödinger Symmetry in Gravitational Mini-Superspaces, Universe 9 (2023) 503 [2207.07312]. – 52 –

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Ben Achour, E

    J. Ben Achour, E. R. Livine and D. Oriti,Schrödinger symmetry of Schwarzschild-(A)dS black hole mechanics, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 104028 [2302.07644]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Cvetic and F

    M. Cvetic and F. Larsen,Conformal Symmetry for Black Holes in Four Dimensions, JHEP 09 (2012) 076 [1112.4846]

    2012 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Cvetic and F

    M. Cvetic and F. Larsen,Conformal Symmetry for General Black Holes, JHEP 02 (2012) 122 [1106.3341]

    2012 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Cvetic and G

    M. Cvetic and G. W. Gibbons,Conformal Symmetry of a Black Hole as a Scaling Limit: A Black Hole in an Asymptotically Conical Box, JHEP 07 (2012) 014 [1201.0601]

    2012 arXiv

  46. [54]

    J. M. Bardeen and G. T. Horowitz,The Extreme Kerr throat geometry: A Vacuum analog of AdS2×S2, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 104030 [hep-th/9905099]

    1999 arXiv

  47. [55]

    H. K. Kunduri, J. Lucietti and H. S. Reall,Near-horizon symmetries of extremal black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.24 (2007) 4169 [0705.4214]

    2007 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Guevara and U

    A. Guevara and U. Kol,Self Dual Black Holes as the Hydrogen Atom, 2311.07933

    arXiv

  49. [57]

    L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni and A. R. Solomon,Static response and Love numbers of Schwarzschild black holes, JCAP 04 (2021) 052 [2010.00593]

    2021 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Charalambous and M

    P. Charalambous and M. M. Ivanov,Scalar Love numbers and Love symmetries of 5-dimensional Myers-Perry black holes, JHEP 07 (2023) 222 [2303.16036]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [59]

    M. J. Rodriguez, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon and L. F. Temoche,Love numbers for rotating black holes in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 084011 [2304.03743]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Aharony, S

    O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity, Phys. Rept. 323 (2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111]

    2000 arXiv

  53. [61]

    J. M. Maldacena, J. Michelson and A. Strominger,Anti-de Sitter fragmentation, JHEP 02 (1999) 011 [hep-th/9812073]

    1999 arXiv

  54. [62]

    J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2 (1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    1998 arXiv

  55. [63]

    G. T. Horowitz and S. F. Ross,Possible resolution of black hole singularities from large N gauge theory, JHEP 04 (1998) 015 [hep-th/9803085]

    1998 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Cadoni and S

    M. Cadoni and S. Mignemi,Classical and semiclassical properties of extremal black holes with dilaton and modulus fields, Nucl. Phys. B 427 (1994) 669 [hep-th/9312171]

    1994 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Cadoni and S

    M. Cadoni and S. Mignemi,Nonsingular four-dimensional black holes and the Jackiw-Teitelboim theory, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 4319 [hep-th/9410041]

    1995 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Bredberg, T

    I. Bredberg, T. Hartman, W. Song and A. Strominger,Black Hole Superradiance From Kerr/CFT, JHEP 04 (2010) 019 [0907.3477]. – 53 –

    2010 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Hadar, A

    S. Hadar, A. Lupsasca and A. P. Porfyriadis,Extreme Black Hole Anabasis, JHEP 03 (2021) 223 [2012.06562]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    A. P. Porfyriadis and G. N. Remmen,Large diffeomorphisms and accidental symmetry of the extremal horizon, JHEP 03 (2022) 107 [2112.13853]

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    de Cesare, R

    M. de Cesare, R. Oliveri and A. P. Porfyriadis,Connecting Gravitational Perturbations: from Bertotti-Robinson to Extreme Reissner-Nordstrom, 2410.23446

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    Banerjee, A

    A. Banerjee, A. P. Porfyriadis and G. N. Remmen,Accidental Symmetry Near Extreme Spinning Black Holes, 2412.19880

    arXiv

  63. [71]

    Chodos and E

    A. Chodos and E. Myers,Gravitational Contribution to the Casimir Energy in Kaluza-Klein Theories, Annals Phys. 156 (1984) 412

    1984

  64. [72]

    Higuchi,Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on theN Sphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO(N,1), J

    A. Higuchi,Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on theN Sphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO(N,1), J. Math. Phys.28 (1987) 1553

    1987

  65. [73]

    Chen and J

    B. Chen and J. Long,Hidden Conformal Symmetry and Quasi-normal Modes, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 126013 [1009.1010]

    2010 arXiv

  66. [74]

    black hole

    A. A. Starobinskiˇi, Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating “black hole”, Sov. Phys. JETP 37 (1973) 28

    1973

  67. [75]

    black hole

    A. A. Starobinskiˇi and S. M. Churilov,Amplification of electromagnetic and gravitational waves scattered by a rotating “black hole”, Sov. Phys. JETP 65 (1974) 1

    1974

  68. [76]

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger,Universal low-energy dynamics for rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 4975 [hep-th/9702015]

    1997 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Castro, A

    A. Castro, A. Maloney and A. Strominger,Hidden Conformal Symmetry of the Kerr Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 024008 [1004.0996]

    2010 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Creci, T

    G. Creci, T. Hinderer and J. Steinhoff,Tidal response from scattering and the role of analytic continuation, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 124061 [2108.03385]

    2021 arXiv

  71. [79]

    M. M. Ivanov and Z. Zhou,Revisiting the matching of black hole tidal responses: A systematic study of relativistic and logarithmic corrections, Phys. Rev. D107 (2023) 084030 [2208.08459]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    ’t Hooft,Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci

    G. ’t Hooft,Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser. B59 (1980) 135

    1980

  73. [81]

    R. A. Porto,The Tune of Love and the Nature(ness) of Spacetime, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 723 [1606.08895]

    2016 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Charalambous,Love numbers and Love symmetries for p-form and gravitational perturbations of higher-dimensional spherically symmetric black holes, JHEP 04 (2024) 122 [2402.07574]

    P. Charalambous,Love numbers and Love symmetries for p-form and gravitational perturbations of higher-dimensional spherically symmetric black holes, JHEP 04 (2024) 122 [2402.07574]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    M. M. Ivanov and Z. Zhou,Vanishing of Black Hole Tidal Love Numbers from Scattering Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett.130 (2023) 091403 [2209.14324]. – 54 –

    2023 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Hod,Purely imaginary polar resonances of rapidly-rotating Kerr black holes, Phys

    S. Hod,Purely imaginary polar resonances of rapidly-rotating Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 084018 [1311.3007]

    2013 arXiv

  77. [85]

    G. B. Cook and M. Zalutskiy,Purely imaginary quasinormal modes of the Kerr geometry, Class. Quant. Grav.33 (2016) 245008 [1603.09710]

    2016 arXiv

  78. [86]

    G. B. Cook and M. Zalutskiy,Modes of the Kerr geometry with purely imaginary frequencies, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016) 104074 [1607.07406]

    2016 arXiv

  79. [87]

    G. W. Gibbons and K.-i. Maeda,Black Holes and Membranes in Higher Dimensional Theories with Dilaton Fields, Nucl. Phys. B 298 (1988) 741

    1988

  80. [88]

    M. J. Duff, R. R. Khuri and J. X. Lu,String and five-brane solitons: Singular or nonsingular?, Nucl. Phys. B 377 (1992) 281 [hep-th/9112023]

    1992 arXiv

  81. [89]

    M. J. Duff and J. X. Lu,Black and super p-branes in diverse dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 416 (1994) 301 [hep-th/9306052]

    1994 arXiv

  82. [90]

    G. W. Gibbons, G. T. Horowitz and P. K. Townsend,Higher dimensional resolution of dilatonic black hole singularities, Class. Quant. Grav.12 (1995) 297 [hep-th/9410073]

    1995 arXiv

  83. [91]

    G. T. Horowitz and A. Strominger,Black strings and P-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 197

    1991

  84. [92]

    Gal’tsov, S

    D. Gal’tsov, S. Klevtsov, D. Orlov and G. Clement,More on general p-brane solutions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A21 (2006) 3575 [hep-th/0508070]

    2006 arXiv

  85. [93]

    J. X. Lu,ADM masses for black strings and p-branes, Phys. Lett. B313 (1993) 29 [hep-th/9304159]

    1993 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Emparan, T

    R. Emparan, T. Harmark, V. Niarchos and N. A. Obers,World-Volume Effective Theory for Higher-Dimensional Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.102 (2009) 191301 [0902.0427]

    2009 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Emparan, T

    R. Emparan, T. Harmark, V. Niarchos and N. A. Obers,Essentials of Blackfold Dynamics, JHEP 03 (2010) 063 [0910.1601]

    2010 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Kol and M

    B. Kol and M. Smolkin,Classical Effective Field Theory and Caged Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 064033 [0712.2822]

    2008 arXiv

  89. [97]

    W. D. Goldberger, J. Li and I. Z. Rothstein,Non-conservative effects on spinning black holes from world-line effective field theory, JHEP 06 (2021) 053 [2012.14869]

    2021 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Hadad, B

    T. Hadad, B. Kol and M. Smolkin,Gravito-magnetic polarization of Schwarzschild black hole, JHEP 06 (2024) 169 [2402.16172]

    2024 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Cvetič, P

    M. Cvetič, P. J. Porfírio and A. Satz,Gaussian null coordinates, near-horizon geometry and conserved charges on the horizon of extremal nondilatonic black p-branes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D29 (2020) 2041004 [2003.09304]

    2020 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Satoh,BTZ black holes and the near horizon geometry of higher dimensional black holes, Phys

    Y. Satoh,BTZ black holes and the near horizon geometry of higher dimensional black holes, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 084010 [hep-th/9810135]. – 55 –

    1999 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Carlip,The (2+1)-Dimensional black hole, Class

    S. Carlip,The (2+1)-Dimensional black hole, Class. Quant. Grav.12 (1995) 2853 [gr-qc/9506079]

    1995 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Berti, V

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso and A. O. Starinets,Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes, Class. Quant. Grav.26 (2009) 163001 [0905.2975]

    2009 arXiv

  95. [103]

    F. Gray, C. Keeler, D. Kubiznak and V. Martin,Love symmetry in higher-dimensional rotating black hole spacetimes, 2409.05964

  96. [104]

    Kapec and A

    D. Kapec and A. Lupsasca,Particle motion near high-spin black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 37 (2020) 015006 [1905.11406]

    2020 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Guica, T

    M. Guica, T. Hartman, W. Song and A. Strominger,The Kerr/CFT Correspondence, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 124008 [0809.4266]

    2009 arXiv

  98. [106]

    H. Lu, J. Mei and C. N. Pope,Kerr/CFT Correspondence in Diverse Dimensions, JHEP 04 (2009) 054 [0811.2225]

    2009 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Krishnan,Hidden Conformal Symmetries of Five-Dimensional Black Holes, JHEP 07 (2010) 039 [1004.3537]

    C. Krishnan,Hidden Conformal Symmetries of Five-Dimensional Black Holes, JHEP 07 (2010) 039 [1004.3537]

    2010 arXiv

  100. [108]

    D. Chen, P. Wang and H. Wu,Hidden conformal symmetry of rotating charged black holes, Gen. Rel. Grav.43 (2011) 181 [1005.1404]

    2011 arXiv

  101. [109]

    D. A. Lowe and A. Skanata,Generalized Hidden Kerr/CFT, J. Phys. A45 (2012) 475401 [1112.1431]

    2012 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Aminov, A

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi and Y. Hatsuda,Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory, Annales Henri Poincare23 (2022) 1951 [2006.06111]

    2022 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Bonelli, C

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. P. Lichtig and A. Tanzini,Exact solution of Kerr black hole perturbations via CFT2 and instanton counting: Greybody factor, quasinormal modes, and Love numbers, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 044047 [2105.04483]

    2022 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Consoli, F

    D. Consoli, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Poghossian,CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, superradiance, echoes and tidal responses, JHEP 12 (2022) 115 [2206.09437]

    2022 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Y. F. Bautista, G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, A. Tanzini and Z. Zhou,Black hole perturbation theory meets CFT2: Kerr-Compton amplitudes from Nekrasov-Shatashvili functions, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 084071 [2312.05965]

    2024 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Arnaudo, G

    P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli and A. Tanzini,One loop effective actions in Kerr-(A)dS black holes, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 106006 [2405.13830]

    2024 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Arnaudo, G

    P. Arnaudo, G. Bonelli and A. Tanzini,One-loop corrections to near extremal Kerr thermodynamics from semiclassical Virasoro blocks, 2412.16057

    arXiv

  108. [116]

    G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski and J. E. Santos,Almost all extremal black holes in AdS are singular, JHEP 01 (2023) 162 [2210.02473]

    2023 arXiv

  109. [117]

    G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G. N. Remmen and J. E. Santos,Extremal Kerr Black Holes as Amplifiers of New Physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 091402 [2303.07358]. – 56 –

    2023 arXiv

  110. [118]

    G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G. N. Remmen and J. E. Santos,Sudden breakdown of effective field theory near cool Kerr-Newman black holes, JHEP 05 (2024) 122 [2403.00051]

    2024 arXiv

  111. [119]

    G. T. Horowitz and J. E. Santos,Smooth extremal horizons are the exception, not the rule, 2411.07295

    arXiv

  112. [120]

    A. R. King, J. P. Lasota and W. Kundt,Black holes and magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975) 3037

    1975

  113. [121]

    Bičák and V

    J. Bičák and V. Janiš,Magnetic fluxes across black holes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society212 (1985) 899 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/212/4/899/3793483/mnras212-0899.pdf]

    1985

  114. [122]

    Bičák, V

    J. Bičák, V. Karas and T. Ledvinka,Black holes and magnetic fields, IAU Symp. 238 (2007) 139 [astro-ph/0610841]

    2007 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Giribet, J

    G. Giribet, J. La Madrid, L. Montecchio, E. R. de Celis and P. Schmied,Zooming in on the horizon when in its Meissner state, JHEP 05 (2023) 207 [2302.14140]

    2023 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Kehagias, D

    A. Kehagias, D. Perrone and A. Riotto,A short note on the Love number of extremal Reissner-Nordstrøm and Kerr-Newman black holes, Phys. Lett. B859 (2024) 139109 [2406.19262]

    2024 arXiv

  117. [125]

    W. E. Couch and R. J. Torrence,Conformal invariance under spatial inversion of extreme Reissner-Nordström black holes, General Relativity and Gravitation16 (1984) 789. – 57 –

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.