$\mathrm{G}_2$-structures with torsion and the deformed Shatashvili-Vafa vertex algebra

Andoni De Arriba de La Hera; Mario Garcia-Fernandez; Mateo Galdeano

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

$\mathrm{G}_2$-structures with torsion and the deformed Shatashvili-Vafa vertex algebra

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On five homogeneous G2 backgrounds, the deformed Shatashvili-Vafa vertex algebra embeds into the chiral de Rham complex with parameter fixed by scalar torsion.

desk verdict Genuinely new explicit SV_a embeddings for five G2 backgrounds, but the printed SV_a definition has typos and the proof skips injectivity and the computer check. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02769 v1 pith:THG7JQ7M submitted 2025-02-04 math.DG hep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.QA

Andoni De Arriba de La Hera , Mateo Galdeano , Mario Garcia-Fernandez This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DGhep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.QA MSC 17B6953C2953C38

keywords deformedShatashvili-VafavertexalgebraG2-structurestorsionclasseschiraldeRhamcomplexsuperaffineheteroticG2systemsupersymmetricalgebrashomogeneousmanifolds

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes an explicit bridge between seven-dimensional G2 geometry and the deformed Shatashvili-Vafa vertex algebra $\mathrm{SV}_a$, a supersymmetric algebra that string theory predicts should appear in the chiral algebra of heterotic G2 backgrounds. For five families of integrable G2-structures with closed torsion, on $S^3\times T^4$ and $S^3\times S^3\times S^1$, the authors construct fields in the associated superaffine vertex algebra and prove these fields satisfy precisely the operator-product relations of $\mathrm{SV}_a$. The parameter $a$ is not arbitrary: it is proportional to the scalar torsion class of the G2-structure, $a = -\frac{7}{6\sqrt{k}}\tau_0$, confirming the semiclassical expectation that torsion controls the deformation. Since the superaffine algebra embeds into the chiral de Rham complex, the result places $\mathrm{SV}_a$ into the actual chiral algebra of the corresponding heterotic backgrounds. This gives the first explicit $\mathrm{SV}_a$ embeddings for $a\neq 0$ and turns a physics expectation into a checkable statement in vertex algebra theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the deformed Shatashvili-Vafa vertex algebra $\mathrm{SV}_a$, a one-parameter supersymmetric vertex algebra generated by the fields $G,L,\Phi,K,X,M$ with the $\lambda$-brackets listed in Section 4.2 and central charge $c=\frac{21}{2}+3a^2$. The embeddings live in the universal superaffine vertex algebra $V^k(\mathfrak{g}_{\mathrm{super}})$ associated to the quadratic Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus\mathfrak{k}^*$, where $\mathfrak{k}$ is the Lie algebra of the group manifold and the bracket is twisted by the closed torsion three-form $H$. The construction uses the odd frame fields $e_i=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\Pi(g^{ij}v_j+v_i)$ and the coefficients $\phi_{ijk}$ of the associative form to define $\Phi$, then sets $K=S\Phi$ and recovers $X,M,G,L$ by iterated $\lambda$-brackets. The central identity is $a=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{k}}\frac{7}{6}\tau_0$, which makes the scalar torsion class $\tau_0$ the parameter of the vertex algebra. When $k=2$, the embedding of $V^2(\mathfrak{g}_{\mathrm{super}})$ into the global sections of the chiral de Rham complex transfers the construction to the geometric target algebra.

What would settle it

Take the $\phi_2$ structure on $S^3\times T^4$, where $\tau_0=6/(7\sqrt{\ell})$, and compute the $\lambda$-bracket $[\Phi_\lambda \Phi]$ in $V^k(\mathfrak{g}_{\mathrm{super}})$ from the explicit formulas of Proposition 5.3. The theorem predicts $[\Phi_\lambda \Phi] = -\frac{7}{2}\lambda^2 + 6X$; an independent calculation giving any other result would refute the embedding claim, and the same check can be applied to the relation (4.1), which must vanish identically for the embedded fields.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 5.4: on each of the five homogeneous G2-manifolds constructed in Section 3, the sections $\Phi=\frac{1}{3k}\sqrt{\frac{2}{k}}\phi_{ijk}:e_i:e_j e_k::$ and $K=S\Phi$ of the superaffine vertex algebra $V^k(\mathfrak{g}_{\mathrm{super}})$ generate an embedding of the deformed Shatashvili-Vafa algebra $\mathrm{SV}_a$, with parameter $a=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{k}}\frac{7}{6}\tau_0$, where $\tau_0$ is the scalar torsion class of the G2-structure. Because $V^2(\mathfrak{g}_{\mathrm{super}})$ embeds into the global sections of the chiral de Rham complex, the same result places $\mathrm{SV}_a$ inside the chiral algebra of the corresponding heterotic G2 backgrounds. This is the first explicit embedding of $\mathrm{SV}_a$ for $a\neq 0$, and it confirms, in these examples, the expectation that the chiral algebra of a heterotic G2 background contains $\mathrm{SV}_a$ with parameter set by the spinor eigenvalue (equivalently by the scalar torsion).

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the computer-assisted check that the proposed fields obey the defining operator-product relations is correct and faithfully reproduced in the paper; if that check contains an error, the claimed embedding does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

On each of the five homogeneous backgrounds, the global sections of the chiral de Rham complex contain a copy of $\mathrm{SV}_a$, so the chiral algebra of the heterotic G2 background is at least as large as this supersymmetric vertex algebra.
The parameter $a$ is fixed by the scalar torsion class $\tau_0$ alone, while the torsion class $\tau_3$ plays no role, making the vertex-algebra content sensitive to a specific piece of the G2 torsion.
When $\tau_0=0$, the construction yields embeddings of the undeformed algebra $\mathrm{SV}_0$ in backgrounds with nonzero torsion, extending the previously known $\mathrm{SV}_0$ embedding to the torsion case.
The two G2-structures on $S^3\times T^4$ share the same metric and torsion three-form but have different $\tau_0$, so the same underlying geometry can support embeddings of $\mathrm{SV}_a$ with different parameters.
The result supports the paper's Conjecture 1.1, that any seven-manifold solving the heterotic G2 system with $\alpha'=0$ admits an $\mathrm{SV}_a$ embedding with $a$ determined by the Killing spinor eigenvalue.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One step beyond the paper, the explicit formula for $\Phi$ is a natural candidate for a coordinate-free construction on any integrable G2-structure with a global parallel frame for the torsionful connection; the five examples here are the homogeneous cases, and nilmanifolds with closed torsion would be a direct test.
This also suggests that, because $a$ is proportional to $\tau_0$, moving along a family of G2-structures should trace a family of $\mathrm{SV}_a$ representations, potentially linking deformations of the vertex algebra to the moduli of heterotic G2 systems.
A further check beyond the paper: an independent symbolic computation of the operator products, carried out without relying on the software used in the paper, would make Theorem 5.4 fully reproducible; the formulas in Proposition 5.3 are explicit enough for such a check.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear —,

This paper does something genuinely new. It gives explicit fields in V^k(g_super) that realize the deformed Shatashvili–Vafa algebra SV_a for non-zero a, on five families of G2-structures with torsion, and it derives a = −(7/6)τ0/√k from the geometry. That parameter relation is not fitted; it is read off from the scalar torsion class, and it matches the semiclassical prediction of de la Ossa–Galdeano–Marchetto. The route through left-equivariant Courant algebroids into the chiral de Rham complex is sensible, and the explicit fields are cleaner than Rodriguez Diaz’s normal-coordinate expression because the torsion connection has vanishing Christoffels in the chosen frame.

The soft spots are real but maybe fixable. The proof of Theorem 5.4 is one sentence: a long verification delegated to the OPEdefs Mathematica package, with no code and no intermediate output. For the paper’s main theorem, that is a significant gap. More seriously, the printed definition of SV_a in §4.2 is not well-formed: in [X_λM] and [M_λM] there are terms such as (1/2T −5λ) and −(5/2T^2 −9/2Tλ −9/2λ^2) with no field on which they act. Those are not central terms, so the defining brackets are ambiguous. I assume these are typos, but as posted they make the target algebra ambiguous. Third, the conclusion ‘embedding’ is not justified: the proof checks the λ-brackets and the relation (4.1), which gives a vertex algebra homomorphism from SV_a to V^k, but it does not prove injectivity. No character or simplicity argument is given, so the image could be a proper quotient.

None of this convinces me the construction is wrong. The parameter match and the explicit five examples are strong evidence the idea is right. But the paper as written leaves the verification in a black box, the definition of SV_a with typos, and the embedding claim overreaching. A revision should include the actual computation (or the code), corrected brackets, and an injectivity argument.

This paper deserves a serious referee: it is concrete, novel, and relevant to vertex algebras from special holonomy and heterotic G2 geometry. But I would not cite it in its current form.

Best,

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper constructs explicit representations of the deformed Shatashvili–Vafa vertex algebra SV_a in the superaffine vertex algebra V^k(g_super), and, after setting k=2, in the global sections of the chiral de Rham complex. The geometric input consists of five integrable G_2-structures with closed torsion on S^3×T^4 and S^3×S^3×S^1, following Fino–Martín-Merchán–Raffero. Theorem 5.4 proposes explicit sections Φ and K, defines X, M, G, and L, and claims that they generate an embedding of SV_a with parameter a = −(1/√k)(7/6)τ0. The proof is a computer-assisted verification using the OPEdefs package. The paper also states Conjecture 1.1 that every solution of the heterotic G_2 system with α'=0 yields such an embedding, and relates the parameter to the scalar torsion class, matching earlier semiclassical work.

Significance. If the construction is correct, this is the first explicit family of embeddings of SV_a with a ≠ 0 into a chiral de Rham complex, giving a concrete mathematical realization of a proposal of Fiset–Gaberdiel and extending Rodríguez Díaz's result for G_2-holonomy manifolds. A notable strength is that the parameter a is derived from the geometry through τ0 rather than fitted to the vertex algebra brackets; the explicit formulas for the fields are concrete and the five examples cover both τ0=0 and τ0≠0 cases. However, the verification is not reproducible as written and the injectivity statement is unproved, so the current version is incomplete.

major comments (3)

[§4.2] The displayed λ-brackets for SV_a are not well-formed as printed. In the bracket [X_λ M] there is a term '(1/2 T − 5λ)' with no field on which the differential operator acts, and in [M_λ M] there is a term '−(5/2 T^2 − 9/2 Tλ − 9/2 λ^2)' with no operand. Because these terms involve T, they cannot be interpreted as central elements of the λ-bracket. As printed, SV_a is therefore not a well-defined SUSY vertex algebra, and Theorem 5.4's assertion that the sections satisfy the brackets introduced in Section 4.2 is not checkable. The authors must correct the displayed brackets and verify the theorem against the corrected definitions.
[Theorem 5.4, proof] The proof consists of the statement that a 'straightforward but long verification' with the OPEdefs Mathematica package shows that the proposed sections satisfy the λ-brackets and condition (4.1). No code, no detailed computation, and no explicit list of checked identities are provided. This is load-bearing because the central claim is exactly that the proposed sections close under the SV_a λ-brackets and satisfy the relation (4.1). I ask the authors to provide reproducible code or a detailed appendix with the computations, including the verification of (4.1), so that the theorem can be independently checked.
[Theorem 5.4] The conclusion that the sections 'generate an embedding of SV_a' is stronger than what the proof establishes. Even assuming the computations are correct, the argument shows that the sections satisfy the defining relations and hence determine a vertex algebra homomorphism from SV_a to V^k(g_super). Injectivity is not shown: the paper does not prove that SV_a is simple, does not exhibit a PBW basis with linearly independent images, and does not otherwise rule out a nontrivial kernel. The theorem and the abstract should either prove injectivity or explicitly state that the result is a homomorphism (a realization) rather than an embedding, with the embedding claim deferred.

minor comments (3)

[Propositions 3.1 and 3.2] In Proposition 3.1 the frame elements are listed as 'η1 = √c1 v1, η2 = √c2 v2, η1 = √c3 v3', where the last occurrence should presumably be η3; the same typo appears in Proposition 3.2, where '˜η1' is used twice instead of '˜η3'.
[Theorem 5.4, display for Φ] The expression for Φ uses the notation ':ei :ejek::' in a way that is ambiguous; it should be parenthesized explicitly, for example as ':e_i (:e_j e_k:):', so that the order of normal ordering is clear.
[Remark 4.4] The statement that the parameter a 'corresponds to i√(2/k) in [12]' should be made precise by indicating the exact sign conventions and the relevant equation in [12], since the sign of a is important for comparing the parameter with the geometric formula a = −(1/√k)(7/6)τ0.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the a–tau_0 relation is a checked prediction, not a fitted input; the embedding claim is verified by an independent OPE computation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the fields Phi, K, X, M, G, L defined in Theorem 5.4 satisfy the lambda-brackets of SV_a with a = -(1/sqrt(k))(7/6)tau_0. The parameter a is not extracted from the vertex algebra brackets by fitting; it is proposed from the semiclassical result in [8] and then verified, via the OPEdefs computation, that the candidate fields close under the SV_a brackets. Nothing in the paper defines tau_0 in terms of a, nor are the SV_a brackets used to impose a. The relation a ~ tau_0 is therefore a derived, falsifiable check rather than an identity built into the definitions. The proof of Theorem 5.4 is admittedly computer-assisted and not written out, and the printed lambda-brackets in Section 4.2 contain malformed-looking standalone operator terms; these are correctness and transparency concerns, not circularity. The use of Proposition 5.2 from [1] is a genuine external published embedding result, and although [1] shares two authors with the present paper, it is not the vehicle by which the a-tau_0 relation is obtained. The theorem's label 'embedding' is not justified by an injectivity argument, but that is an unsupported conclusion, not a circular reduction. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or fields. The free parameters are geometric and algebraic constants of the explicit examples. The main external inputs are the cited embedding theorem and G2-structure classification; the central unverified step is the OPE computation, flagged separately.

free parameters (2)

ell, s, c1, c2, c3, c7 = positive constants
Geometric moduli of the homogeneous metrics and G2-structures; they determine tau_0 and therefore a. They are inputs, not fitted to vertex algebra data.
k = non-zero complex number, arbitrary
Level of the universal superaffine vertex algebra V^k(g_super); it appears in the embedding formulas and in a = -1/sqrt(k) * 7/6 tau_0, but is a standard parameter of the construction.

assumptions (3)

standard math Axioms and construction of SUSY vertex algebras (Heluani-Kac, Barron).
The paper builds on this formalism throughout Section 4.
domain assumption The embedding theorem of Alvarez-Consul et al. [1, Prop. 5.2]: V^2(g_super) embeds into the global sections of the chiral de Rham complex for a compact Lie group with a left-equivariant exact Courant algebroid.
Used to pass from superaffine vertex algebra embeddings to chiral de Rham complex embeddings; cited, not proven here.
domain assumption Existence and torsion class formulas for the integrable G2-structures on S^3 x T^4 and S^3 x S^3 x S^1 (from [11] and [13]).
The explicit phi and tau_0 values in Section 3 are taken from these references.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $\mathrm{G}_2$-structures with torsion and the deformed Shatashvili-Vafa vertex algebra." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/THG7JQ7M

@misc{pith2026250202769,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $\mathrmG_2$-structures with torsion and the deformed Shatashvili-Vafa vertex algebra},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/THG7JQ7M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02769}
}

abstract

We construct representations of the deformed Shatashvili-Vafa vertex algebra $\mathrm{SV}_a$, with parameter $a \in \mathbb{C}$, as recently proposed in the physics literature by Fiset and Gaberdiel. The geometric input for our construction are integrable $\mathrm{G}_2$-structures with closed torsion, solving the heterotic $\mathrm{G}_2$ system with $\alpha'=0$ on the group manifolds $S^3\times T^4$ and $S^3\times S^3\times S^1$. From considerations in string theory, one expects the chiral algebra of these backgrounds to include $\mathrm{SV}_a$, and we provide a mathematical realization of this expectation by obtaining embeddings of $\mathrm{SV}_a$ in the corresponding superaffine vertex algebra and the chiral de Rham complex. In our examples, the parameter $a$ is proportional to the scalar torsion class of the $\mathrm{G}_2$ structure, $a \sim \tau_0$, as expected from previous work in the semi-classical limit by the second author, jointly with De la Ossa and Marchetto.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

The canonical symmetry reduction of string backgrounds
math.DG 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A compact string background with nonvanishing canonical symmetry reduces to a transverse string generalized Ricci soliton that is conformally co-closed, with explicit torsion in SU(3), G2, and Spin(7).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

´Alvarez-C´ onsul, L., De Arriba de La Hera, A., Garcia-Fernandez, M .: (0,2) Mirror Symmetry on Homogeneous Hopf Surfaces. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2024(2) (2024) 1211–1298. DOI 10.1093/imrn/ rnad016

doi:10.1093/imrn/ 2024
[2]

DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2305.06836

´Alvarez-C´ onsul, L., De Arriba de La Hera, A., Garcia-Fernandez, M .: Vertex algebras from the Hull-Strominger system (2023). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2305.06836

arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.06836 2023
[3]

N=1 Neveu-Schwarz vertex operator superalgebras over Grassmann algebras and with odd formal variables

Barron, K.D.: N=1 Neveu-Schwarz vertex operator superalgeb ras over Grassmann algebras and with odd formal variables (1999). DOI 10.48550/arXiv. \protect\vrulewidth0pt\protect\href{http://arxiv. org/abs/math/9910007}{math/9910007}

work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 1999
[4]

Blumenhagen, R.: Covariant construction of N=1 super W-algebr as. Nucl. Phys. B381 (1992) 641–

work page 1992
[5]

In: Proceedings of G¨ okova Geometry-Topology C on- ference, pp

Bryant, R.L.: Some remarks on G2-structures. In: Proceedings of G¨ okova Geometry-Topology C on- ference, pp. 75–109 (2005)

work page 2005
[6]

Moduli of $G_2$ structures and the Strominger system in dimension 7

Clarke, A., Garcia-Fernandez, M., Tipler, C.: Moduli of G2 structures and the Strominger system in dimension 7 (2016). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.1607.01219

work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.01219 2016
[7]

de la Ossa, X., Larfors, M., Svanes, E.E.: The Inﬁnitesimal Moduli S pace of Heterotic G 2 Systems. Commun. Math. Phys. 360(2) (2018) 727–775. DOI 10.1007/s00220-017-3013-8

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-017-3013-8 2018
[8]

DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2412.13904

de la Ossa, X., Galdeano, M., Marchetto, E.: SW -algebras and strings with torsion (2024). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2412.13904

arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.13904 2024

Show all 26 references

[9]

Ekstrand, J., Heluani, R., Kallen, J., Zabzine, M.: Non-linear sigma mo dels via the chiral de Rham complex. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13(4) (2009) 1221–1254. DOI 10.4310/ATMP.2009.v13.n4.a6

2009 doi
[10]

Ekstrand, J., Heluani, R., Kallen, J., Zabzine, M.: Chiral de Rham co mplex on Riemannian manifolds and special holonomy. Commun. Math. Phys. 318 (2013) 575–613. DOI 10.1007/s00220-013-1659-4

2013 doi
[11]

Fino, A., Mart ´ ın-Merch´ an, L., Raﬀero, A.: The twisted G 2 equation for strong G 2-structures with torsion. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 20(6) (2024) 2711–2767. DOI 10.4310/PAMQ.241112235423

2024 doi
[12]

JHEP 05 (2021) 156

Fiset, M.A., Gaberdiel, M.R.: Deformed Shatashvili-Vafa algebra fo r superstrings on AdS 3 × M 7. JHEP 05 (2021) 156. DOI 10.1007/JHEP05(2021)156

2021 doi
[13]

Friedrich, T., Ivanov, S.: Parallel spinors and connections with s kew symmetric torsion in string theory. Asian J. Math. 6 (2002) 303–336. DOI 10.4310/AJM.2002.v6.n2.a5

2002 doi
[14]

Heluani, R.: Supersymmetry of the chiral de Rham complex II: Co mmuting Sectors. Int. Math. Res. Not 2009(6) (2009) 953–987. DOI 10.1093/imrn/rnn145

2009 doi
[15]

Heluani, R.: Recent advances and open questions on the susy st ructure of the chiral de Rham complex. J. Phys. A 50(42), 2017 (2017). DOI 10.1088/1751-8121/aa8539

2017 doi
[16]

Heluani, R., Kac, V.G.: Supersymmetric vertex algebras. Commun . Math. Phys. 271 (2007) 103–178. DOI 10.1007/s00220-006-0173-3

2007 doi
[17]

Heluani, R., Rodr ´ ıguez D ´ ıaz, L.O.: The Shatashvili-Vafa G2 superconformal algebra as a Quantum Hamiltonian Reduction of D(2, 1; α ). Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 46 (3) (2015) 331–351. DOI 10.1007/s00574-015-0094-x

2015 doi
[18]

Heluani, R., Zabzine, M.: Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds and the c hiral de Rham complex. Adv. Math. 223 (2010) 1815–1844. DOI 10.1016/j.aim.2009.10.007

2010 doi
[19]

University lecture ser ies

Kac, V.: Vertex algebras for beginners. University lecture ser ies. American Mathematical Society (1998)

1998
[20]

Karigiannis, S.: Introduction to G 2 Geometry, pp. 3–50. Springer US, New York, NY (2020). DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-0577-6 1

2020 doi
[21]

Malikov, F., Schechtman, V., Vaintrob, A.: Chiral de Rham complex . Commun. Math. Phys. 204 (1999) 439–473. DOI 10.1007/s002200050653 G2-STRUCTURES AND THE DEFORMED SHATASHVILI–V AF A VERTEX ALGE BRA 13

1999 doi
[22]

Rodr ´ ıguez D ´ ıaz, L.O.: G2 Holonomy Manifolds are Superconformal. Commun. Math. Phys. 364(2) (2018) 385–440. DOI 10.1007/s00220-018-3264-z

2018 doi
[23]

Selecta Math

Shatashvili, S.L., Vafa, C.: Superstrings and manifold of exceptio nal holonomy. Selecta Math. 1 (1995) 347–381. DOI 10.1007/BF01671569

1995 doi
[24]

DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2404.12937

Silva, A.A.d., Garcia-Fernandez, M., Lotay, J.D., Earp, H.N.S.: Coup led G 2-instantons (2024). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2404.12937

2024 doi arXiv
[25]

Thielemans, K.: An Algorithmic approach to operator product ex pansions, W algebras and W strings. Ph.D. thesis, Leuven U. (1994) Universidad Nacional de Educaci ´on a Distancia (UNED), C. de Juan del Rosal, 10, Moncloa- Aravaca,, 28040 Madrid, Spain Email address : andoni.dea...

1994
[669]

DOI 10.1016/0550-3213(92)90494-V

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

´Alvarez-C´ onsul, L., De Arriba de La Hera, A., Garcia-Fernandez, M .: (0,2) Mirror Symmetry on Homogeneous Hopf Surfaces. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2024(2) (2024) 1211–1298. DOI 10.1093/imrn/ rnad016

doi:10.1093/imrn/ 2024

[2] [2]

DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2305.06836

´Alvarez-C´ onsul, L., De Arriba de La Hera, A., Garcia-Fernandez, M .: Vertex algebras from the Hull-Strominger system (2023). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2305.06836

arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.06836 2023

[3] [3]

N=1 Neveu-Schwarz vertex operator superalgebras over Grassmann algebras and with odd formal variables

Barron, K.D.: N=1 Neveu-Schwarz vertex operator superalgeb ras over Grassmann algebras and with odd formal variables (1999). DOI 10.48550/arXiv. \protect\vrulewidth0pt\protect\href{http://arxiv. org/abs/math/9910007}{math/9910007}

work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv 1999

[4] [4]

Blumenhagen, R.: Covariant construction of N=1 super W-algebr as. Nucl. Phys. B381 (1992) 641–

work page 1992

[5] [5]

In: Proceedings of G¨ okova Geometry-Topology C on- ference, pp

Bryant, R.L.: Some remarks on G2-structures. In: Proceedings of G¨ okova Geometry-Topology C on- ference, pp. 75–109 (2005)

work page 2005

[6] [6]

Moduli of $G_2$ structures and the Strominger system in dimension 7

Clarke, A., Garcia-Fernandez, M., Tipler, C.: Moduli of G2 structures and the Strominger system in dimension 7 (2016). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.1607.01219

work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.01219 2016

[7] [7]

de la Ossa, X., Larfors, M., Svanes, E.E.: The Inﬁnitesimal Moduli S pace of Heterotic G 2 Systems. Commun. Math. Phys. 360(2) (2018) 727–775. DOI 10.1007/s00220-017-3013-8

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-017-3013-8 2018

[8] [8]

DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2412.13904

de la Ossa, X., Galdeano, M., Marchetto, E.: SW -algebras and strings with torsion (2024). DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2412.13904

arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.13904 2024