Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Identifying hard native instances for the maximum independent set problem on neutral atoms quantum processors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.04291 v1 pith:NJM4JD2X submitted 2025-02-06 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumclassicalinstancesadvantageproblematomsbenchmarksgraphs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Maximum Independent Set (MIS) problem is a fundamental combinatorial optimization task that can be naturally mapped onto the Ising Hamiltonian of neutral atom quantum processors. Given its connection to NP-hard problems and real-world applications, there has been significant experimental interest in exploring quantum advantage for MIS. Pioneering experiments on King's Lattice graphs suggested a quadratic speed-up over simulated annealing, but recent benchmarks using state-of-the-art methods found no clear advantage, likely due to the structured nature of the tested instances. In this work, we generate hard instances of unit-disk graphs by leveraging complexity theory results and varying key hardness parameters such as density and treewidth. For a fixed graph size, we show that increasing these parameters can lead to prohibitive classical runtime increases of several orders of magnitude. We then compare classical and quantum approaches on small instances and find that, at this scale, quantum solutions are slower than classical ones for finding exact solutions. Based on extended classical benchmarks at larger problem sizes, we estimate that scaling up to a thousand atoms with a 1 kHz repetition rate is a necessary step toward demonstrating a computational advantage with quantum methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dynamical Lie Algebras Cannot Describe Shallow QAOA: Cragged Terrains, Barren Plateaus, and Empirical Hardness Models

    quant-ph 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For shallow QAOA on maximum independent set, loss landscape variance increases with system size instead of vanishing, contradicting dynamical Lie algebra predictions.

  2. Quantum-Informed Portfolio Selection: An End-to-End Pipeline Validated on Trapped-Ion Hardware with Real Market Data

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    qReduMIS, using QAOA frozen-node signals plus classical reductions, solves real market MIS portfolio instances up to 225 assets on Helios with far better success and TTS scaling than standalone QAOA.

  3. A Framework for Quantum Advantage

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A framework defining quantum advantage as verifiable plus classically superior, with a conclusion that random circuit sampling is not yet a satisfactory path.

  4. Strategic Plan for Neutral Atom Quantum Computation

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    If qubit-count growth (~1.8x/yr) and gate-error reduction (~0.62x/yr) continue, neutral-atom quantum computers could reach practical quantum advantage within a decade, this roadmap projects.

Pith tools