Chiral Instabilities in Driven-Dissipative Quantum Liquids

Bastien Lapierre; Per Moosavi; Shinsei Ryu; Zhi-Xing Lin

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Chiral Instabilities in Driven-Dissipative Quantum Liquids

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A periodically driven Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid coupled to a purely chiral thermal bath is always unstable, and increasing dissipation switches the instability from symmetric to single-chirality amplification.

desk verdict Solid exact algebra and a plausible new chiral instability, but the phase transition rests on unproved, branch-dependent equalities and lacks direct dynamical evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04443 v2 pith:32W7HST2 submitted 2025-02-06 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-el

Zhi-Xing Lin , Bastien Lapierre , Per Moosavi , Shinsei Ryu This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-el MSC 81V7082C1082C3181Q12

keywords Tomonaga-LuttingerliquidFloquetdriveLindbladmasterequationparametricinstabilitychiraldissipationdriven-dissipativephasetransitionnon-Hermitianskineffectone-dimensionalquantumliquids

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a periodically driven Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid coupled to a thermal bath using Floquet-Lindblad theory. It shows that a symmetric, detailed-balance bath can stabilize the otherwise parametrically unstable liquid if the time-averaged dissipation is strong enough. The central result is that a purely chiral bath, coupling only right-moving bosons, never stabilizes the liquid; instead it generates a new kind of instability in which only one chirality is exponentially amplified. Raising the chiral dissipation strength produces a transition between a symmetric parametric instability, where both chiralities amplify, and this chiral instability, characterized by the numerically observed equalities $\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^+) = -\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^-)$ and $\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^+) = \operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^-)$, respectively.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a Floquet-Lindblad rotating-frame construction: the time-dependent Liouvillian is decomposed into a semisimple $\mathfrak{su}(1,1)$ subalgebra and a solvable ideal, and a time-periodic superoperator $W(t)$ brings the Liouvillian to a time-independent form. This reduces the dynamics of each momentum mode to a Riccati equation for the auxiliary function $f_{q,2}^\pm(t)$, whose time-averaged solutions define the effective frequencies $\bar{\Lambda}_q^\pm$ and $\bar{\Lambda}_q$. The Liouvillian spectrum is then obtained by vectorization, giving closed-form eigenvalues (19) and (29) whose real parts determine stability. The chiral distinction enters through the unequal coefficients of $D_{q,1}$ and $\bar{D}_{q,1}$ in the effective Liouvillian (26), which is the mechanism that allows a single chirality to be selectively amplified.

What would settle it

Compute $\bar{\Lambda}_q^\pm$ from equations (27)-(28) for a drive not of the sinusoidal form (4), or for a parameter point outside the studied $(A, \omega/q)$ region, or for $q > 1$, and check whether the equalities (31) and (32) and the violation of condition (30) still hold; finding any mode with $\bar{\gamma} \geq 4 \max\{|\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^+)|, |\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^-)|\}$, or a point where both chiralities acquire a positive real part in the spectrum despite (31), would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors construct an exactly solvable driven-dissipative model by periodically modulating the Luttinger parameter and coupling the liquid to a bath through a Floquet-Lindblad master equation. With symmetric dissipation satisfying detailed balance, stability of all bosonic modes is achieved when the time-averaged dissipation $\bar{\gamma}$ exceeds $2|\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q)|$ for every momentum mode $q$; because $\bar{\Lambda}_q$ depends only on $\omega/q$ and the amplification is largest in the first resonance lobe, a single finite dissipation strength can stabilize the entire many-body resonance. With a purely chiral dissipation, the effective Liouvillian acquires unequal coefficients for the two chiralities, and the authors find numerically that the stability condition is never satisfied for nonzero $\bar{\gamma}$. Instead, the system always undergoes a parametric instability, whose character changes with $\bar{\gamma}$: when $\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^+) = -\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^-)$ only left-moving quasiparticles (in the rotating frame) grow exponentially, while when $\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^+) = \operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^-)$ both chiralities grow equally. The quantity $\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^+) + \operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^-)$ acts as an order parameter that jumps at the transition, and the resulting chiral imbalance is interpreted as reminiscent of the non-Hermitian skin effect.

Load-bearing premise

The classification of the two phases rests on the equalities $\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^+) = -\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^-)$ in the chiral phase and $\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^+) = \operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^-)$ in the symmetric phase, which the authors report from numerical observation rather than proof; if these exact equalities fail in any parameter region, the selective chiral amplification and the phase transition are not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A finite symmetric dissipation can fully stabilize the many-body parametric resonance of a driven Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid, despite the presence of infinitely many bosonic modes.
A purely chiral dissipation converts a stable driven liquid into an unstable one: dissipation induces a parametric instability that would not occur in the corresponding closed system.
When the driving parameters already lie in the unstable regime, increasing the chiral dissipation drives a transition from a symmetric parametric instability to a chiral parametric instability in which only one chirality is amplified.
The chiral phase exhibits a dynamical chiral imbalance analogous to the non-Hermitian skin effect, as encoded in the effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian (33) with unequal decay rates for the two chiralities.
Quantum point contacts between quantum Hall edges, where only one edge is coupled to a bath, are suggested as a possible experimental platform for realizing the chiral instability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the numerically observed equalities $\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^+) = -\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^-)$ and $\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^+) = \operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^-)$ are exact, they likely reflect a hidden symmetry of the coupled Riccati equations; proving them would turn the phase transition into a rigorous prediction.
The order parameter $\operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^+) + \operatorname{Im}(\bar{\Lambda}_q^-)$ could in principle be measured through the asymmetric growth of right- and left-moving energy correlators, providing a dynamical probe of chiral dissipation.
The sharp transition between the two phases may correspond to an exceptional point in the effective non-Hermitian Hamiltonian (33), where the decay rates of the two chiralities cross; this could explain the nonanalytic behavior and strengthen the connection to the Liouvillian skin effect.
The same algebraic rotating-frame construction should extend to quasiperiodic or random drives, and whether a finite dissipation can still stabilize all modes in those settings is an open question.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Mark, here's my read on 2502.04443.

The symmetric-dissipation half of the paper is solid. The rotating-frame construction is standard but applied carefully; the effective Liouvillian (15) is exact, and the all-mode stabilization argument using the first-lobe maximum is clean and persuasive. The numerical fits for the correlators in Sec. II support the stable-to-unstable transition.

The new physics is the chiral instability. That is where I would push back. The classification into 'symmetric' and 'chiral' unstable phases is entirely carried by the numerically observed equalities (31) and (32), which are never proved. This is more than a cosmetic gap. For the even drives (4) and the even dissipation (9), the Riccati equations admit the symmetry f−(t) = −f+(−t), which maps solutions of the f+ equation to solutions of the f− equation. A short calculation gives Im(Λ̄−) = −Im(Λ̄+) identically on that branch. So (31) is not an independent numerical finding; it is an identity for any symmetry-respecting pair. Observing (32) in the symmetric unstable phase means the solver has switched to a different branch, and the sharp jump in the order parameter in Figs. 4(c,d) could be a branch-switch artifact rather than a genuine nonanalyticity. The paper does not specify how the periodic solutions f± are selected, nor does it show that the auxiliary functions g in the rotating-frame construction are periodic for the chosen branch. Without that, the phase boundary is not established.

Second, the chiral selective amplification is demonstrated only in the spectrum of the time-independent Liouvillian in the rotating frame. Since the rotating frame is a time-dependent Bogoliubov transformation, 'left movers amplified in the rotating frame' does not automatically imply that the physical correlator ⟨¯a†¯a⟩ grows while ⟨a†a⟩ does not. The direct time evolution of the original-frame correlators, which they do provide for the symmetric case, is missing for the chiral case. That is exactly the observable that would make the claim concrete.

I also note that the assertion that condition (30) is never satisfied is based on numerical sampling, not a proof. That is a smaller point.

None of this sinks the paper. The algebra is correct, the phenomenon is plausible, and the connection to the non-Hermitian skin effect is worth exploring. But the central phase transition needs a precise branch-selection rule and a direct dynamical demonstration. It deserves a serious referee, and I would ask for those things in a conditional accept.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a periodically driven Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid coupled to a thermal bath, using a Floquet-Lindblad approach based on a closed algebra of superoperators. For a symmetric dissipation satisfying detailed balance, the authors derive an effective time-independent Liouvillian (15) and its spectrum (19), leading to the stability condition (20). They then introduce a purely chiral dissipation (25), obtain the effective Liouvillian (26) and spectrum (29), and report a driven-dissipative phase transition between a conventional symmetric parametric instability and a new chiral parametric instability in which only left-moving quasiparticles are exponentially amplified. The classification of these two unstable phases rests on numerically observed equalities, Eqs. (31) and (32).

Significance. If established, the chiral parametric instability is a novel driven-dissipative phenomenon: it arises from the interplay of the drive and chiral dissipation, cannot occur in either ingredient alone, and connects to non-Hermitian skin-effect physics in a bosonic many-body setting. The paper has clear strengths: the rotating-frame construction is derived algebraically, the effective Liouvillians and spectra are analytic, the stability conditions for the symmetric case are exact, and the results hold for general periodic drives beyond the specific numerical example. The authors also provide reproducible code and data. The principal weakness is that the central chiral-phase classification and the 'always unstable' claim are based on numerical observation rather than a proof, and no branch-selection rule is given for the periodic Riccati solutions underlying the effective Liouvillian.

major comments (3)

[Sec. III.B, Eqs. (31)-(32)] The classification of the symmetric versus chiral instability rests on the numerically observed equalities Im(Λ̄+_q) = -Im(Λ̄-_q) in the chiral phase and Im(Λ̄+_q) = Im(Λ̄-_q) in the symmetric phase. These equalities are never derived. The rotating-frame construction only requires f±_{q,2} to be time-periodic solutions of the Riccati equations (28), which can admit more than one periodic solution, and the paper does not specify a branch-selection rule (e.g., continuity from γ=0, attractiveness, or agreement with the physical steady state). For the even drives (4) and γ_t (9), the time-reversal symmetry f^-_{q,2}(t) = - (f^+_{q,2}(-t))^* maps solutions of the f+ equation to solutions of the f- equation and yields Im(Λ̄+_q) = -Im(Λ̄-_q) identically; observing Eq. (32) in the 'symmetric unstable phase' therefore requires the numerical solver to switch branches. If such a branch switch occurs, the sharp jumps in the order parameter in Figs. 4(c,d) could be a branch-switching artifact rather than a genuine spectral nonanalyticity, and the selective chiral amplification and the phase boundary in Fig. 4 would not be established. Please prove the equalities for the physical branch or specify and justify the branch selection, and demonstrate that the equalities and the phase diagram are independent of that choice.
[Sec. III.B, claim that Eq. (30) is never satisfied] The conclusion that the stability condition (30) is never satisfied for the chiral dissipation is based on numerical results for a single drive and dissipation form, and the authors state it as a general result (the system is 'always unstable' for any chiral dissipation). No proof or broad parameter scan over (A, B, ω/q, β) is provided. Since this 'always unstable' property is a central claim of the paper and is combined with the equalities (31)-(32) to identify the chiral instability, it needs either an analytic argument or a systematic numerical search to rule out stable regions.
[Sec. II.B, Eq. (22) and Fig. 2(b)] The all-mode stabilization result, one of the two main results of the paper, relies on the claim that |Im(Λ̄_q)| as a function of q/ω reaches a global maximum in the first instability lobe for any driving amplitude A. This maximum property is stated without proof and is only illustrated for specific parameter values. Because it is used to convert the single-mode condition (20) into the all-mode condition (22), the conclusion that a finite dissipation can stabilize the many-body parametric resonance would be on firmer ground if this statement were proved or supported by a systematic numerical study over the parameter space.

minor comments (4)

[Sec. III.B] The text refers to the phase described by Eq. (32) as an 'asymmetric parametric instability', while later paragraphs call it a 'symmetric parametric instability'; these terms should be unified to avoid confusion.
[Sec. II.C, Eq. (24)] The fitting form ⟨a†_q a_q⟩_t ∼ C(1 - e^{Γt}) is ambiguous in sign: for Γ>0 the expression is negative unless C is negative, and the plotted fits in Fig. 3 would be clearer with an explicit sign convention for C.
[Fig. 4(a)] The caption uses 'black regions' and 'colored' regions, but the color scale and the distinction may not be legible in grayscale; please clarify the color coding and specify what quantity the colors represent.
[Sec. III.B, around Eq. (31)] The statement that |Im(Λ̄+_q)| = |Im(Λ̄-_q)| is introduced informally before Eqs. (31) and (32); since the classification relies on this equality, it should be stated as a numbered equation or otherwise explicitly referenced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Floquet–Lindblad derivation is self-contained; the unproved equalities (31)–(32) are a numerical-branch gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The main derivation chain—Hamiltonian (1)–(3), Lindblad master equation (6), rotating-frame construction in Appendices A and E, effective Liouvillians (15) and (26), spectra (19) and (29), and stability conditions (20) and (30)—is algebraic and self-contained. The rotating-frame coefficients are fixed by ordinary differential equations that the paper derives explicitly, and no parameter is fitted to external data. The central claim about chiral versus symmetric instability rests on the numerically observed equalities Im(Λ̄+_q) = −Im(Λ̄−_q) and Im(Λ̄+_q) = Im(Λ̄−_q), Eqs. (31)–(32), which are asserted from numerics rather than proved; this is an unresolved branch-selection and correctness concern, not a case where the prediction reduces by construction to its input. The paper does cite the authors' prior work [50] for the SU(1,1) Floquet structure of the closed TLL, but the same structure is referenced to [48,49] as well and is used only as an algebraic tool; the equations in the paper itself, Eqs. (5), (14), (17)–(18), (26)–(28), carry the derivation. Thus no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations, and the analysis is best described as having minor self-citation but no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard TLL and Lindblad modeling, the closed-algebra rotating-frame method from prior literature, and an engineered chiral bath. No observed data are fitted, but the chiral phase classification relies on numerically observed equalities (31)-(32) rather than analytic proof.

free parameters (4)

drive amplitude A and offset B = A=0.1, B=-0.3 (examples)
Parameters in (4) that shape the periodic modulations; chosen by hand for all numerics and phase diagrams, not fitted to data.
bath inverse temperature β = β=1 (examples)
Enters the detailed-balance coefficients (10); set to a representative value, the qualitative results are insensitive.
dissipation strength γ = γ=0.05 to 1 (examples)
Overall bath coupling in (9); the phase transition is studied as a function of γ.
bare velocity v0 and drive frequency ω = v0=1, ω=1.25 (examples)
Set the scales in (4); fixed for numerics, only ratios like ω/q matter analytically.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The time-dependent TLL Hamiltonian (3) with periodic ϵt, λt is the correct starting point.
Standard low-energy effective theory; the paper does not justify higher-order corrections or integrability breaking.
domain assumption The open-system dynamics is Markovian and given by the time-dependent Lindblad equation (6).
Assumed without derivation from a microscopic bath; common in Floquet-Lindblad studies.
domain assumption The dissipator coefficients (10) yield a valid detailed-balance Lindblad form for the symmetric case.
Chosen so the time-independent limit thermalizes; the authors state it is a Lindblad equation with jump operators {ã, ¯ã, ã†, ¯ã†}.
standard math The 7- and 11-dimensional superoperator algebras close and admit the stated Levi decompositions.
The commutation tables in the SM Appendices A and E verify this; it is a mathematical property relied on for the rotating frame.
standard math The Riccati equations (18) and (28) admit bounded 2π-periodic solutions on the studied parameter ranges.
Required for a periodic rotating frame; not proven, but consistent with the numerical solutions shown.
ad hoc to paper The purely chiral bath (25) is a legitimate physical model despite its nonlocal, momentum-linear dissipation.
Engineered specifically to isolate one chirality; experimentally only approximated, as the authors note for quantum Hall edges.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral Instabilities in Driven-Dissipative Quantum Liquids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/32W7HST2

@misc{pith2026250204443,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral Instabilities in Driven-Dissipative Quantum Liquids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/32W7HST2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04443}
}

read the original abstract

We investigate the nonequilibrium dynamics of periodically driven Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids (TLLs) coupled to a thermal bath using a Floquet-Lindblad approach. When the coupling to the bath satisfies detailed balance, we obtain a condition for parametric instabilities to be suppressed, symmetrically for both chiralities. Remarkably, by designing a purely chiral coupling to the bath, instead of instability suppression, we uncover a driven-dissipative phase transition between the former symmetric parametric instability and a new chiral parametric instability. In the latter, a single chirality of bosonic quasiparticles gets exponentially amplified, leading to a dynamical chiral imbalance within the TLL, reminiscent of the non-Hermitian skin effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04443 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Properties of the driven-dissipative phase transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The stroboscopic evolution of the correlator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Properties of the driven-dissipative phase transi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The Liouvillian spectrum (29) in the case of the chiral dissipation for right and left movers, plotted separately in (a) and (b) in the symmetric unstable phase and in (c) and (d) in the chiral unstable phase. The functions ϵt and λt are chosen as in (4) and γt as in (…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Exact Lindbladian Dynamics from Conformal Embeddings and Topological Defects in Conformal Field Theory
cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Conformal embeddings and Verlinde defect lines make adjoint Lindbladians triangular or diagonal on natural CFT operator spaces, yielding exact open dynamics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

scale invariant

Different contours of 2| Im( ¯Λq)| correspond to unstable regions for different values of the dissipationγ in (9) through the condition (20). The phase boundary in the absence of dissipation (γ = 0) is shown as a dashed white curve. (b) Without dissipation, transitions between phases can be seen as nonanalyticities in2| Im( ¯Λq)| viewed as a function ofq/...

work page
[2]

D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crys- tals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 090402 (2016)

2016
[3]

Khemani, A

V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phase structure of driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 250401 (2016)

2016
[4]

M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. X 3, 031005 (2013)

2013
[5]

Titum, E

P. Titum, E. Berg, M. S. Rudner, G. Refael, and N. H. Lindner, Anomalous Floquet-Anderson insulator as a nonadiabatic quantized charge pump, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021013 (2016)

work page 2016
[6]

D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Prethermal phases of matter protected by time-translation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011026 (2017)

2017
[7]

Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N.Gedik,ObservationofFloquet-Blochstatesonthesur- face of a topological insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

2013
[8]

Lignier, C

H. Lignier, C. Sias, D. Ciampini, Y. Singh, A. Zen- esini, O. Morsch, and E. Arimondo, Dynamical control of matter-wave tunneling in periodic potentials, Phys. Rev. 9 Lett. 99, 220403 (2007)

work page 2007

Show all 78 references

[9]

M. C. Rechtsman, J. M. Zeuner, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, D. Podolsky, F. Dreisow, S. Nolte, M. Segev, and A. Sza- meit, Photonic Floquet topological insulators, Nature 496, 196 (2013)

2013
[10]

D’Alessio and M

L. D’Alessio and M. Rigol, Long-time behavior ofisolated periodically driven interacting lattice systems, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041048 (2014)

2014
[11]

Lazarides, A

A. Lazarides, A. Das, and R. Moessner, Equilibrium states of generic quantum systems subject to periodic driving, Phys. Rev. E90, 012110 (2014)

2014
[12]

Wintersperger, M

K. Wintersperger, M. Bukov, J. Näger, S. Lellouch, E. Demler, U. Schneider, I. Bloch, N. Goldman, and M. Aidelsburger, Parametric instabilities of interacting bosons in periodically driven 1D optical lattices, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011030 (2020)

2020
[13]

Lazarides, A

A. Lazarides, A. Das, and R. Moessner, Periodic thermo- dynamics of isolated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 150401 (2014)

2014
[14]

Ponte, Z

P. Ponte, Z. Papić, F. Huveneers, and D. A. Abanin, Many-body localization in periodically driven systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 140401 (2015)

2015
[15]

M. B. Plenio, S. F. Huelga, A. Beige, and P. L. Knight, Cavity-loss-induced generation of entangled atoms, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2468 (1999)

1999
[16]

Kraus, H

B. Kraus, H. P. Büchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller, Preparation of entangled states by quan- tum Markov processes, Phys. Rev. A78, 042307 (2008)

2008
[17]

Diehl, A

S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. Büch- ler, and P. Zoller, Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nat. Phys.4, 878 (2008)

2008
[18]

B. Zhu, J. Marino, N. Y. Yao, M. D. Lukin, and E. A. Demler, Dicke time crystals in driven-dissipative quantum many-body systems, New J. Phys.21, 073028 (2019)

2019
[19]

Mori, Floquet states in open quantum systems, Annu

T. Mori, Floquet states in open quantum systems, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.14, 35 (2023)

2023
[20]

C. M. Dai, Z. C. Shi, and X. X. Yi, Floquet theorem with open systems and its applications, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032121 (2016)

2016
[21]

Haddadfarshi, J

F. Haddadfarshi, J. Cui, and F. Mintert, Completely pos- itive approximate solutions of driven open quantum sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 130402 (2015)

2015
[22]

G. P. Fedorov, S. V. Remizov, D. S. Shapiro, W. V. Pogosov, E. Egorova, I. Tsitsilin, M. Andronik, A. A. Dobronosova, I. A. Rodionov, O. V. Astafiev, and A. V. Ustinov, Photon transport in a Bose-Hubbard chain of superconducting artificial atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 180503 (2021)

2021
[23]

Fitzpatrick, N

M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Y. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a dissipative phase tran- sition in a one-dimensional circuit QED lattice, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011016 (2017)

2017
[24]

Chitra and O

R. Chitra and O. Zilberberg, Dynamical many-body phases of the parametrically driven, dissipative Dicke model, Phys. Rev. A92, 023815 (2015)

2015
[25]

Soriente, T

M. Soriente, T. L. Heugel, K. Omiya, R. Chitra, and O. Zilberberg, Distinctive class of dissipation-induced phase transitions and their universal characteristics, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023100 (2021)

2021
[26]

K. Choo, B. Lapierre, C. Kuhlenkamp, A. Tiwari, T. Ne- upert, and R. Chitra, Thermal and dissipative effects on the heating transition in a driven critical system, SciPost Phys. 13, 104 (2022)

2022
[27]

S. B. Jäger, J. M. Giesen, I. Schneider, and S. Eggert, Dissipative Dicke time crystals: An atom’s point of view, Phys. Rev. A110, L010202 (2024)

2024
[28]

F. D. M. Haldane, ‘Luttinger liquid theory’ of one- dimensional quantum fluids. I. Properties of the Lut- tinger model and their extension to the general 1D inter- acting spinless Fermi gas, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 14, 2585 (1981)

1981
[29]

Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems, Prog

S. Tomonaga, Remarks on Bloch’s method of sound waves applied to many-fermion problems, Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 544 (1950)

1950
[30]

J. M. Luttinger, An exactly soluble model of a many- fermion system, J. Math. Phys.4, 1154 (1963)

1963
[31]

D. C. Mattis and E. H. Lieb, Exact solution of a many- fermion system and its associated boson field, J. Math. Phys. 6, 304 (1965)

1965
[32]

E. H. Lieb and W. Liniger, Exact analysis of an inter- acting Bose gas. I. The general solution and the ground state, Phys. Rev.130, 1605 (1963)

1963
[33]

H. J. Schulz, G. Cuniberti, and P. Pieri, Fermi liq- uids and Luttinger liquids, in Field Theories for Low- Dimensional Condensed Matter Systems , Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Vol. 131, edited by G. Morandi, P. Sodano, A. Tagliacozzo, and V. Tognetti (Springer, Ber...

2000 arXiv
[34]

Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension , In- ternational Series of Monographs on Physics (Oxford University Press, 2003)

T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension , In- ternational Series of Monographs on Physics (Oxford University Press, 2003)

2003
[35]

M. A. Cazalilla, R. Citro, T. Giamarchi, E. Orignac, and M. Rigol, One dimensional bosons: From condensed mat- ter systems to ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1405 (2011)

2011
[36]

Ngo Dinh, D

S. Ngo Dinh, D. A. Bagrets, and A. D. Mirlin, Interaction quench in nonequilibrium Luttinger liquids, Phys. Rev. B 88, 245405 (2013)

2013
[37]

Wei and H

Y.-M. Wei and H. Lu, General interaction quenches in a Luttinger liquid, Commun. Theor. Phys. 74, 015702 (2022)

2022
[38]

M. A. Cazalilla, Effect of suddenly turning on interac- tions in the Luttinger model, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 156403 (2006)

2006
[39]

Iucci and M

A. Iucci and M. A. Cazalilla, Quantum quench dynamics of the Luttinger model, Phys. Rev. A80, 063619 (2009)

2009
[40]

Sachdeva, T

R. Sachdeva, T. Nag, A. Agarwal, and A. Dutta, Finite- time interaction quench in a Luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. B 90, 045421 (2014)

2014
[41]

Karrasch, J

C. Karrasch, J. Rentrop, D. Schuricht, and V. Meden, Luttinger-liquid universality in the time evolution af- ter an interaction quench, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 126406 (2012)

2012
[42]

B. Dóra, F. Pollmann, J. Fortágh, and G. Zaránd, Loschmidt echo and the many-body orthogonality catas- trophe in a qubit-coupled Luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 046402 (2013)

2013
[43]

B. Dóra, R. Lundgren, M. Selover, and F. Pollmann, Momentum-space entanglement and Loschmidt echo in Luttinger liquids after a quantum quench, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 010603 (2016)

2016
[44]

Langmann, J

E. Langmann, J. L. Lebowitz, V. Mastropietro, and P. Moosavi, Steady states and universal conductance in a quenched Luttinger model, Commun. Math. Phys.349, 551 (2017). 10

2017
[45]

Ruggiero, L

P. Ruggiero, L. Foini, and T. Giamarchi, Large-scale thermalization, prethermalization, andimpactoftemper- ature in the quench dynamics of two unequal Luttinger liquids, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013048 (2021)

2021
[46]

Ruggiero, P

P. Ruggiero, P. Calabrese, L. Foini, and T. Giamarchi, Quenches in initially coupled Tomonaga-Luttinger liq- uids: A conformal field theory approach, SciPost Phys. 11, 055 (2021)

2021
[47]

Dóra and C

B. Dóra and C. P. Moca, Quantum quench in PT - symmetric Luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 136802 (2020)

2020
[48]

Moosavi, Exact Dirac-Bogoliubov-de Gennes dynam- ics for inhomogeneous quantum liquids, Phys

P. Moosavi, Exact Dirac-Bogoliubov-de Gennes dynam- ics for inhomogeneous quantum liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 100401 (2023)

2023
[49]

Bukov and M

M. Bukov and M. Heyl, Parametric instability in period- ically driven Luttinger liquids, Phys. Rev. B86, 054304 (2012)

2012
[50]

Fazzini, P

S. Fazzini, P. Chudzinski, C. Dauer, I. Schneider, and S. Eggert, Nonequilibrium Floquet steady states of time- periodic driven Luttinger liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 243401 (2021)

2021
[51]

Datta, B

S. Datta, B. Lapierre, P. Moosavi, and A. Tiwari, MarginalquenchesanddrivesinTomonaga-Luttingerliq- uids, SciPost Phys.14, 108 (2023)

2023
[52]

Dupays, B

L. Dupays, B. Dóra, and A. del Campo, Exact dynamics of the Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid and shortcuts to adia- baticity, Phys. Rev. B.110, 155104 (2024)

2024
[53]

Bácsi, C

A. Bácsi, C. P. Moca, and B. Dóra, Dissipation-induced Luttinger liquid correlations in a one-dimensional Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 136401 (2020)

2020
[54]

Bácsi and B

A. Bácsi and B. Dóra, Lindbladian route towards ther- malization of a Luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. B 107, 125149 (2023)

2023
[55]

Yamamoto and N

K. Yamamoto and N. Kawakami, Universal description of dissipative Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids withSU(N ) spin symmetry: Exact spectrum and critical exponents, Phys. Rev. B 107, 045110 (2023)

2023
[56]

Yamamoto, M

K. Yamamoto, M. Nakagawa, M. Tezuka, M. Ueda, and N. Kawakami, Universal properties of dissipative Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids: Case study of a non- Hermitian XXZ spin chain, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205125 (2022)

2022
[57]

Gritsev, Conformal symmetry in quasifree Marko- vian open quantum systems, Phys

A.I.Lotkov, D.V.Kurlov, A.K.Fedorov, N.A.Nemkov, and V. Gritsev, Conformal symmetry in quasifree Marko- vian open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B108, 064312 (2023)

2023
[58]

Scopa, G

S. Scopa, G. T. Landi, and D. Karevski, Lindblad- Floquet description of finite-time quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. A97, 062121 (2018)

2018
[59]

Scopa, G

S. Scopa, G. T. Landi, A. Hammoumi, and D. Karevski, Exact solution of time-dependent Lindblad equations with closed algebras, Phys. Rev. A99, 022105 (2019)

2019
[60]

Chen, Y.-M

H. Chen, Y.-M. Hu, W. Zhang, M. A. Kurniawan, Y. Shao, X. Chen, A. Prem, and X. Dai, Periodically driven open quantum systems: Spectral properties and nonequilibrium steady states, Phys. Rev. B109, 184309 (2024)

2024
[61]

Schnell, A

A. Schnell, A. Eckardt, and S. Denisov, Is there a Floquet Lindbladian?, Phys. Rev. B101, 100301 (2020)

2020
[62]

Fruchart, R

M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature 592, 363 (2021)

2021
[63]

Hatano and D

N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 570 (1996)

1996
[64]

Yao and Z

S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invari- ants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018)

2018
[65]

See Supplemental Material for appendices with technical details for the results in the main text
[66]

These components can be ex- pressed in terms of the bosonic fields φ(x), Π(x) or alternatively using new right/left-moving bosonic fields ρ±(x) = ρ±(x)†

The TLL model has two conserved U (1) currents, a vector current and an axial current, with components ρ(x), j(x) and ρ5(x), j5(x), respectively, and the Hamil- tonian (1) is symmetric under exchanging K ↔ K −1 and (ρ, j) ↔ (ρ5, j5). These components can be ex- pressed in term...
[67]

Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun

G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

1976
[68]

Thompson and A

F. Thompson and A. Kamenev, Field theory of many- body Lindbladian dynamics, Ann. Phys. 455, 169385 (2023)

2023
[69]

The effective Hamiltonian is obtained as˜Heff = ˜Hstat − i P j γjL† jLj/2, where ˜Hstat istheHamiltonianintheuni- tary part of the time-independent Liouvillian,Lj denote the jump operators in the time-independent dissipator, and γj are the corresponding couplings
[70]

A. J. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems, Adv. Phys.63, 77 (2014)

2014
[71]

Nakamura, K

D. Nakamura, K. Inaka, N. Okuma, and M. Sato, Univer- sal platform of point-gap topological phases from topo- logical materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 256602 (2023)

2023
[72]

T. Haga, M. Nakagawa, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Liouvillian skin effect: Slowing down of relaxation pro- cesses without gap closing, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 070402 (2021)

2021
[73]

McDonald, T

A. McDonald, T. Pereg-Barnea, and A. A. Clerk, Phase- dependent chiral transport and effective non-Hermitian dynamics in a bosonic Kitaev-Majorana chain, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041031 (2018)

2018
[74]

McDonald, R

A. McDonald, R. Hanai, and A. A. Clerk, Nonequilib- rium stationary states of quantum non-Hermitian lattice models, Phys. Rev. B105, 064302 (2022)

2022
[75]

P. T. Dumitrescu, R. Vasseur, and A. C. Potter, Log- arithmically slow relaxation in quasiperiodically driven random spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 070602 (2018)

2018
[76]

Lapierre, K

B. Lapierre, K. Choo, A. Tiwari, C. Tauber, T. Neupert, and R. Chitra, Fine structure of heating in a quasiperi- odically driven critical quantum system, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033461 (2020)

2020
[77]

H. Zhao, F. Mintert, R. Moessner, and J. Knolle, Ran- dom multipolar driving: Tunably slow heating through spectral engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 040601 (2021)

2021
[78]

11 Supplemental Material This supplemental material contains a number of appendices with technical details for the results in the main text

https://github.com/Zoeylinzhixing/ DrivendissipativeLL (2025). 11 Supplemental Material This supplemental material contains a number of appendices with technical details for the results in the main text. A. CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROT A TING FRAME FOR THE SYMMETRIC DISSIP A TION O...

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

scale invariant

Different contours of 2| Im( ¯Λq)| correspond to unstable regions for different values of the dissipationγ in (9) through the condition (20). The phase boundary in the absence of dissipation (γ = 0) is shown as a dashed white curve. (b) Without dissipation, transitions between phases can be seen as nonanalyticities in2| Im( ¯Λq)| viewed as a function ofq/...

work page

[2] [2]

D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Floquet time crys- tals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 090402 (2016)

2016

[3] [3]

Khemani, A

V. Khemani, A. Lazarides, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Phase structure of driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 250401 (2016)

2016

[4] [4]

M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. X 3, 031005 (2013)

2013

[5] [5]

Titum, E

P. Titum, E. Berg, M. S. Rudner, G. Refael, and N. H. Lindner, Anomalous Floquet-Anderson insulator as a nonadiabatic quantized charge pump, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021013 (2016)

work page 2016

[6] [6]

D. V. Else, B. Bauer, and C. Nayak, Prethermal phases of matter protected by time-translation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011026 (2017)

2017

[7] [7]

Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N.Gedik,ObservationofFloquet-Blochstatesonthesur- face of a topological insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

2013

[8] [8]

Lignier, C

H. Lignier, C. Sias, D. Ciampini, Y. Singh, A. Zen- esini, O. Morsch, and E. Arimondo, Dynamical control of matter-wave tunneling in periodic potentials, Phys. Rev. 9 Lett. 99, 220403 (2007)

work page 2007