Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Intrinsic conformal structures make open CFT operator dynamics exactly solvable, via Majorana hierarchies, current embeddings, and topological-line dephasing.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 06:24 UTC pith:C22P3U4K

load-bearing objection Clean operator-closure constructions that extend quasi-free and current-mode Lindbladians into multi-current and modular dephasing regimes; math holds, novelty real but incremental. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08827 v1 pith:C22P3U4K submitted 2026-07-09 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.str-elhep-thquant-ph

Exact Lindbladian Dynamics from Conformal Embeddings and Topological Defects in Conformal Field Theory

Chen Bai This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.str-elhep-thquant-ph
keywords Lindbladian dynamicsconformal field theoryMajorana fermionsconformal embeddingsWess-Zumino-Witten modelsVerlinde linestopological defectsmodular S matrix
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Exact analytic control of interacting open quantum systems is rare. This paper shows that certain structures already present in (1+1)D conformal field theory restore exact solvability for Markovian Lindbladian dynamics. Linear jumps on Majorana modes make the adjoint Lindbladian triangular on reduced even Majorana monomials, so every finite even operator evolves by a recursive, closed hierarchy. When a Wess–Zumino–Witten model admits a conformal Majorana embedding, the same hierarchy gives exact dynamics of products of affine currents realized as Majorana bilinears, even in regimes where the current algebra itself does not close. Separately, Verlinde topological defect lines used as jumps make primary-sector dynamics exactly diagonal: topological-charge probabilities stay fixed while intersector coherences dephase at rates set by the modular S matrix and measurement strengths. The common message is that conformal embeddings and modular data can organize exactly solvable open conformal dynamics rather than leaving it intractable.

Core claim

Intrinsic conformal structures restore exact solvability of open CFT dynamics: linear Majorana-mode jumps make the adjoint Lindbladian triangular on reduced even Majorana monomials, giving recursive exact Heisenberg evolution; conformal Majorana embeddings transfer that hierarchy to products of affine currents even when Kac–Moody closure fails; and Verlinde topological-defect-line jumps make primary-sector dynamics exactly diagonal, conserving topological-charge probabilities while dephasing intersector coherences at rates fixed by the modular S matrix and nonnegative measurement strengths.

What carries the argument

Operator-space closure of the adjoint Lindbladian (L†[A] ⊆ A). For Majoranas this is a triangular hierarchy by even degree; for currents it is inherited via conformal Majorana embeddings; for Verlinde lines it is exact diagonalization of matrix units in the primary-sector basis with rates Γ_ab = (1/2) ∑_x η_x |λ_x(a)-λ_x(b)|^{2}.

Load-bearing premise

Matching the Majorana solution to pure WZW current dynamics requires a true conformal embedding so the coset stress tensor vanishes; without that match the ambient solution is not pure WZW dynamics. The Verlinde result is exact only inside the finite primary-sector operator space.

What would settle it

For a concrete conformal embedding (e.g. SU(2)_10 ⊂ SO(5)_1), compute the multi-current Heisenberg evolution both from the Majorana hierarchy and from direct numerical integration of the Lindblad equation on a truncated mode space; any mismatch in the long-time vacuum contractions or finite-time four-Majorana coefficients falsifies the claimed transfer of exact solvability. For the Ising Verlinde example, measure whether off-diagonal primary coherences decay exactly at the predicted Γ rates while diagonal sector weights remain fixed.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript identifies intrinsic conformal structures that restore exact solvability of open (1+1)D CFT dynamics in the Heisenberg picture, defined as operator-space closure of the adjoint Lindbladian. For N Majorana fermions with linear mode jumps, the adjoint Lindbladian is triangular on reduced even Majorana monomials, giving recursive exact evolution (including pure-loss cooling and finite-temperature detailed balance). In WZW models that admit conformal Majorana embeddings, affine currents realized as Majorana bilinears inherit this hierarchy, so products of currents remain exactly solvable even when the Kac–Moody algebra alone does not close. In diagonal RCFTs, Verlinde topological defect lines used as jump operators make primary-sector dynamics exactly diagonal: topological-charge probabilities are conserved while intersector coherences dephase at rates fixed by the modular S matrix and nonnegative measurement strengths. The SM supplies product rules, multi-current recursion, long-time limits, Ramond zero modes, an Ising example, dephasing-time bounds, and a closed Virasoro SLq(2,R) block under symmetric rates.

Significance. Exact analytic control of interacting Lindbladians is scarce; most results remain quasi-free. If the operator-closure constructions hold as stated, the paper substantially enlarges the solvable landscape by showing that conformal embeddings and modular data organize closed dissipative hierarchies. The transfer of the Majorana triangular hierarchy to multi-current WZW operators goes beyond the single-current/symmetric-rate closure of Tang, Barad, and Wen, and the Verlinde construction supplies a clean, modular-data-controlled model of topological-charge dephasing with a direct (2+1)D bulk interpretation. Explicit recursive equations, vacuum long-time projections, mixing/dephasing bounds, and the Ising example make the claims concrete. These are genuine strengths for a theory Letter in open quantum many-body physics and CFT.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / Exact Solvability of the Lindbladian] Definition of exact solvability (Eqs. (4)–(5) and footnote [24]): the paper correctly equates solvability with finite operator-space closure L†[A]⊆A, not full spectral integrability of L. The title and abstract, however, lead with “Exact Lindbladian Dynamics” without that qualification. Because the spectrum of L, all steady states, and relaxation modes are not determined, the operator-closure definition should be stated more prominently in the abstract or opening paragraph so the central claim is not misread as spectral solvability.
  2. [Exact current dynamics from conformal Majorana embeddings] Multi-current recursion, Eq. (36) and the O2 discussion: after expanding currents as Majorana bilinears the relevant space for any fixed finite product of current modes is the finite-degree even Majorana hierarchy (degrees 2m…0), which is triangular and recursively solvable; the SM gives the fully explicit four-Majorana and two-current formulae. The main text should state this more clearly—i.e., that “exact” for m>2 means recursive closed-form sums over contraction channels within that graded hierarchy, not an infinite unsolvable cascade—so the practical content of the multi-current claim is transparent without the SM.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract / Introduction] Abstract and introduction: the conformal-embedding restriction (c_ĝk=N/2 and H_ψ=H_WZW) is correctly flagged after Eq. (31) and in SM note (54), but a short parenthetical in the abstract would prevent readers from over-generalizing the WZW claims to non-conformal embeddings.
  2. [Majorana CFTs / Verlinde-line Lindbladian] Notation: Γ_{q,A} is introduced for pair rates and later reused in the Verlinde dephasing rates Γ_{ab}; a distinct symbol (e.g., Γ^V_{ab}) would reduce momentary confusion when both constructions are discussed together.
  3. [Discussion / SM §IV] The Virasoro SLq(2,R) construction is only sketched in the Discussion and fully treated in SM §IV; a one-sentence pointer in the main text that symmetric rates close the block while pure cooling does not would help readers who skip the SM.
  4. [SM, Example: Ising CFT] Ising example (SM): the modular S-matrix and eigenvalue table are clear; adding the explicit numerical ordering of Γ_Ising_V for a sample (η_σ,η_ψ) would make the dephasing-time bound immediately usable.
  5. [Acknowledgment] Acknowledgment of ChatGPT for verification and polishing is transparent; ensure that all displayed equations were independently checked, as is standard.
  6. [Throughout] Minor typographical consistency: “Neveu-Schwarz” vs “Neveu–Schwarz”, and occasional missing thin spaces in mode indices (e.g., ψ^A_q).

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: Majorana triangular hierarchy, embedding transfer, and Verlinde dephasing are derived directly from CARs, bilinear realizations, and modular eigenvalues; free rates γ/η are not fitted.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction / Exact Solvability paragraph (after Eq. 5); citation [23]]
    "Following [23], we establish the notion of exact solvability. A Lindbladian is considered exactly solvable within an operator space A if L†[A] ⊆ A …"

    The definition of “exact solvability” (operator-space closure) is taken verbatim from the authors’ overlapping prior work [23]. This is only definitional scaffolding, not a load-bearing uniqueness or existence claim; the subsequent Majorana, embedding, and Verlinde calculations stand independently of that citation. Hence it raises the score by only one point.

full rationale

The paper’s three main constructions are self-contained operator-algebra calculations. The Majorana hierarchy follows by applying the adjoint Lindbladian (Eq. 12 / SM S9) to reduced even monomials and using the CARs to show that every dissipator either multiplies by a damping factor or contracts a pair, lowering degree by two (main text after Eq. 18; SM S22–S25); the resulting triangular system is solved recursively from the identity and bilinears upward. Affine-current products inherit the same hierarchy once currents are written as Majorana bilinears (Eq. 24) under a conformal embedding that equates the Hamiltonians (Eqs. 30–31); the multi-current recursion (Eq. 36 / SM S100) is an explicit expansion, not an assumption of closure. The Verlinde construction is exactly diagonal on End(H_p) because H and the Verlinde lines W_x are simultaneously diagonalizable with eigenvalues λ_x(a)=S_xa/S_1a (Eqs. 43, 50 / SM S131–S147); the dephasing rates Γ_ab are algebraic consequences of those eigenvalues and free non-negative strengths η_x. Long-time limits (e.g., pure-loss current contractions reducing to kn heta(n)δ_ab) are obtained by exponential decay of non-contracted monomials, then observed to match known vacuum expectations; they are not inserted by hand. Self-citations to Tang et al. [23] supply motivation and the shared definition of operator closure, while the deferred Virasoro SL_q(2,R) block [44] is explicitly postponed; neither is load-bearing for the three claims above. No parameters are fitted to data, no uniqueness theorem is imported to force the ansatz, and no result is renamed from an empirical pattern. The only minor self-referential element is the shared solvability notion with [23], which does not reduce any derived equation to its own input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is pure theory. Free parameters are the nonnegative jump rates of the models, not data fits. Background axioms are standard Lindblad form, free-fermion CARs, existence of certain conformal Majorana embeddings, and modular/Verlinde data of diagonal RCFTs. No new physical entities are postulated; solvability is obtained by restricting jumps and operator spaces to known CFT structures.

free parameters (3)
  • Majorana jump rates γ(q,A) ≥ 0
    Species- and mode-dependent loss/gain rates that define the Lindbladian; arbitrary nonnegative inputs, not fitted to data.
  • Verlinde measurement strengths η_x ≥ 0
    Coupling strengths of topological defect line jumps; free nonnegative parameters controlling dephasing rates Γ_ab.
  • Symmetric Virasoro rates γ_+ = γ_- = γ (SM §IV)
    Hand-imposed equality needed for finite SL_q(2,R) block closure; asymmetric rates generate products outside the block.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Markovian open dynamics is generated by a Lindblad master equation with Hamiltonian H and jump operators K_i (adjoint form used throughout).
    Standard open-system premise; invoked from the definition of L† in the Introduction and Exact Solvability section.
  • standard math N Majorana modes obey CARs {ψ^A_q, ψ^B_r}=δ^{AB}δ_{q+r,0} with (ψ^A_q)†=ψ^A_{-q}.
    Free-fermion algebra used to prove triangular action on even monomials (Eqs. (6)–(20)).
  • domain assumption Certain ĝ_k ⊂ so(N)_1 embeddings are conformal, so H_ψ = H^{G_k}_WZW and c_ĝk = N/2.
    Required to identify ambient Majorana dynamics with pure WZW dynamics; stated after Eq. (29)–(31) and SM conformal-embedding section.
  • standard math In a diagonal RCFT, Verlinde lines act as W_x = ∑_a (S_xa/S_1a) P_a on the primary-sector space and obey the Verlinde fusion algebra.
    Standard modular data; used to obtain diagonal L†_V on P_ab (Eqs. (43)–(50)).
  • ad hoc to paper Exact solvability means operator-space closure L†[A] ⊆ A (finite linear system), not full spectral integrability of L.
    Definition adopted from Tang et al. and stated explicitly; footnote notes it does not determine the full spectrum or all steady states.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 35341 in / 3335 out tokens · 30407 ms · 2026-07-13T06:24:33.003028+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Analyzing the dynamics of physical observables in open quantum many-body systems is a fundamental but highly challenging task that has yielded very few exact results. In this work, we identify intrinsic conformal structures that restore exact solvability in $(1+1)$D conformal field theories. For $N$ Majorana fermions with linear mode jumps, the adjoint Lindbladian is triangular on reduced even Majorana monomials, yielding recursive exact Heisenberg evolution. In Wess-Zumino-Witten models admitting conformal Majorana embeddings, this hierarchy gives exact dynamics of affine-current products realized as Majorana bilinears, including regimes where the Kac-Moody current algebra alone does not close. In diagonal rational conformal field theories, Verlinde topological defect lines furnish jump operators whose primary-sector dynamics is exactly diagonal: topological-charge probabilities are conserved, while intersector coherences dephase at rates fixed by the modular $S$ matrix and nonnegative measurement strengths. These examples show that intrinsic conformal structures, such as conformal embeddings and modular data, can organize exactly solvable open conformal dynamics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Geometry of Quantum Complexity in Open Systems

    quant-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Nielsen complexity for Lindbladian open systems induces a sub-Finslerian geometry on mixed states whose flag curvature depends on control penalty factors.

  2. The Geometry of Quantum Complexity in Open Systems

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Open-system quantum complexity is governed by a sub-Finslerian geometry whose curvature depends on the cost penalties for unitary and dissipative controls.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 20 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    M¨ uller, S

    M. M¨ uller, S. Diehl, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller, Engineered open systems and quantum simulations with atoms and ions, inAdvances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 61 (Elsevier, 2012) pp. 1–80

    2012

  2. [2]

    Reiter, A

    F. Reiter, A. S. Sørensen, P. Zoller, and C. A. Muschik, Dissipative quantum error correction and application to quantum sensing with trapped ions, Nat. Commun.8, 1822 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    Tomadin, S

    A. Tomadin, S. Diehl, M. D. Lukin, P. Rabl, and P. Zoller, Reservoir engineering and dynamical phase transitions in optomechanical arrays, Phys. Rev. A86, 033821 (2012)

    2012

  4. [4]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    2007

  5. [5]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  6. [6]

    Ishii and D

    T. Ishii and D. Takeda, Lindblad dynamics in holography, Phys. Rev. D112, 046020 (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New J

    T. Prosen, Third quantization: a general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi systems, New J. Phys.10, 043026 (2008), arXiv:0801.1257 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Prosen and B

    T. Prosen and B. ˇZunkoviˇ c, Exact solution of Marko- vian master equations for quadratic Fermi systems: ther- mal baths, open XY spin chains and non-equilibrium phase transition, New J. Phys.12, 025016 (2010), arXiv:0910.0195 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    Barthel and Y

    T. Barthel and Y. Zhang, Solving quasi-free and quadratic Lindblad master equations for open fermionic and bosonic systems, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2022 7 (11), 113101, arXiv:2112.08344 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Yamanaka and T

    K. Yamanaka and T. Sasamoto, Exact solution for the Lindbladian dynamics for the open XX spin chain with boundary dissipation, SciPost Phys.14, 112 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    A. I. Lotkov, D. V. Kurlov, A. K. Fedorov, N. A. Nemkov, and V. Gritsev, Conformal symmetry in quasifree Marko- vian open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B108, 064312 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    W. Mao, M. Nozaki, K. Tamaoka, and M. T. Tan, Local operator quench induced by two-dimensional inhomoge- neous and homogeneous CFT hamiltonians, J. High En- ergy Phys.2024(07), 200, arXiv:2403.15851 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    L. Su, A. Clerk, and I. Martin, Dynamics and phases of nonunitary Floquet transverse-field Ising model, Phys. Rev. Research6, 013131 (2024), arXiv:2306.07428 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Wen, Exactly solvable non-unitary time evolution in quantum critical systems I: effect of complex space-time metrics, J

    X. Wen, Exactly solvable non-unitary time evolution in quantum critical systems I: effect of complex space-time metrics, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2024(10), 103103, arXiv:2406.17059 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Lapierre, P

    B. Lapierre, P. Pelliconi, S. Ryu, and J. Sonner, Driven nonunitary dynamics of quantum critical systems, Phys. Rev. B112, 104322 (2025), arXiv:2505.01508 [cond- mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Z.-X. Lin, B. Lapierre, P. Moosavi, and S. Ryu, Chiral instabilities in driven-dissipative quantum liquids, Phys. Rev. B111, 165131 (2025), arXiv:2502.04443 [cond- mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    C. Bai, W. Mao, M. Nozaki, M. T. Tan, and X. Wen, Relaxation process during complex time evolution in two-dimensional integrable and chaotic CFTs, (2026), arXiv:2601.09290 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Barad, Q

    R. Barad, Q. Tang, and X. Wen, Dissipation meets con- formal interface in open quantum systems: How the re- laxation rate is suppressed, Phys. Rev. B112, 235143 (2025), arXiv:2505.04715 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Karch and M

    A. Karch and M. Wang, Universality of dissipation across holographic interfaces, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2601.16888 (2026), arXiv:2601.16888 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Lapierre, P

    B. Lapierre, P. Moosavi, and B. Oblak, Nonequilib- rium Probes of Quantum Geometry in Gapless Systems, (2025), arXiv:2511.09639 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Lapierre, L.-H

    B. Lapierre, L.-H. Mo, and S. Ryu, Entanglement tran- sitions in structured and random nonunitary Gaussian circuits, (2025), arXiv:2507.03768 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Toni, Effective dynamics of open 2D CFTs (2025), arXiv:2507.15165 [hep-th]

    L. Toni, Effective dynamics of open 2D CFTs (2025), arXiv:2507.15165 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Q. Tang, R. Barad, and X. Wen, Exact operator dynam- ics in Lindbladian Wess-Zumino-Witten conformal field theories (2026), arXiv:2606.19465 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Consequently, it cannot determine the complete spec- trum ofL, nor all of its steady states or relaxation modes

    It is important to note that satisfying the closure condi- tion does not constitute a full integrable Lindbladian. Consequently, it cannot determine the complete spec- trum ofL, nor all of its steady states or relaxation modes

  25. [25]

    Prosen, Spectral theorem for the Lindblad equation for quadratic open fermionic systems, J

    T. Prosen, Spectral theorem for the Lindblad equation for quadratic open fermionic systems, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp.2010(7), 07020, arXiv:1005.0763 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  26. [26]

    Prosen and T

    T. Prosen and T. H. Seligman, Quantization over boson operator spaces (2010), arXiv:1007.2921 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    See the Supplemental Material for derivations of the ex- actly solvable Lindbladians, related cooling, mixing, and dephasing times, as well as a discussion of the Ramond sector

  28. [28]

    V. G. Kac, P. M. Frajria, P. Papi, and F. Xu, Conformal embeddings and simple current extensions, International Mathematics Research Notices2015, 5229 (2015), https://academic.oup.com/imrn/article- pdf/2015/14/5229/2332515/rnu092.pdf

    2015

  29. [29]

    F. A. Bais and J. K. Slingerland, Condensate-induced transitions between topologically ordered phases, Phys. Rev. B79, 045316 (2009)

    2009

  30. [30]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´ en´ echal,Conformal Field Theory(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  31. [31]

    Not every WZW model admits a Majorana realization. Moreover, if the embedding is not conformal, the Majo- rana stress tensor decomposes as Tψ =T Sug ˆgk +T coset.(54) The Majorana calculation then remains exact for the full ambient Majorana theory governed byH ψ, but it cannot be identified with pureG k WZW dynamics unless the coset stress tensor vanishes...

  32. [32]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Seiberg, Classical and quantum confor- mal field theory, Commun. Math. Phys.123, 177 (1989)

    1989

  33. [33]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008), arXiv:0707.1889

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  34. [34]

    Verlinde, Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2d conformal field theory, Nucl

    E. Verlinde, Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2d conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B300, 360 (1988)

    1988

  35. [35]

    V. B. Petkova and J.-B. Zuber, Generalised twisted parti- tion functions, Phys. Lett. B504, 157 (2001), arXiv:hep- th/0011021

    arXiv 2001

  36. [36]

    Fr¨ ohlich, J

    J. Fr¨ ohlich, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert, Du- ality and defects in rational conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B763, 354 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0607247

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  37. [37]

    Jacobs and D

    K. Jacobs and D. A. Steck, A straightforward intro- duction to continuous quantum measurement, Contemp. Phys.47, 279 (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0611067

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  38. [38]

    Bonderson, K

    P. Bonderson, K. Shtengel, and J. K. Slingerland, De- coherence of anyonic charge in interferometry measure- ments, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 070401 (2007), arXiv:quant- ph/0608119

    arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    Bonderson, K

    P. Bonderson, K. Shtengel, and J. K. Slingerland, Inter- ferometry of non-abelian anyons, Ann. Phys.323, 2709 (2008), arXiv:0707.4206

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  40. [40]

    Zatloukal, L

    V. Zatloukal, L. Lehman, S. Singh, J. K. Pachos, and G. K. Brennen, Transport properties of anyons in ran- dom topological environments, Phys. Rev. B90, 134201 (2014), arXiv:1207.5000 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  41. [41]

    J. Park, Y. Gefen, and H.-S. Sim, Topological dephasing in theν= 2/3 fractional quantum hall regime, Phys. Rev. B92, 245437 (2015), arXiv:1501.06030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  42. [42]

    Y. Bao, R. Fan, A. Vishwanath, and E. Altman, Mixed- state topological order and the errorfield double formula- tion of decoherence-induced transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 220402 (2026), arXiv:2301.05687

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Hwang, Mixed-state quantum spin liquids and dynam- ical anyon condensations in kitaev lindbladians, Quan- tum8, 1412 (2024), arXiv:2305.09197

    K. Hwang, Mixed-state quantum spin liquids and dynam- ical anyon condensations in kitaev lindbladians, Quan- tum8, 1412 (2024), arXiv:2305.09197

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Upcoming Work from Xueda Wen’s Group

  45. [45]

    Ding, C.-F

    Z. Ding, C.-F. Chen, and L. Lin, Single-ancilla ground state preparation via Lindbladians, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033147 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Y. Zhan, Z. Ding, J. Huhn, J. Gray, J. Preskill, G. K.-L. Chan, and L. Lin, Rapid quantum ground state prepara- 8 tion via dissipative dynamics, Phys. Rev. X16, 011004 (2026), arXiv:2503.15827 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Lin, Dissipative preparation of many-body quantum states: Towards practical quantum advantage, (2025), arXiv:2505.21308 [quant-ph]

    L. Lin, Dissipative preparation of many-body quantum states: Towards practical quantum advantage, (2025), arXiv:2505.21308 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    L. A. Lessa, R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, Strong-to-weak spontaneous symmetry break- ing in mixed quantum states, PRX Quantum6, 010344 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    P. Sala, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Oshikawa, and Y. You, Spontaneous strong symmetry breaking in open sys- tems: Purification perspective, Phys. Rev. B110, 155150 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Y. Kuno, T. Orito, and I. Ichinose, Strong-to-weak sym- metry breaking states in stochastic dephasing stabilizer circuits, Phys. Rev. B110, 094106 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    D. Gu, Z. Wang, and Z. Wang, Spontaneous symmetry breaking in open quantum systems: Strong, weak, and strong-to-weak, Phys. Rev. B112, 245123 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Exact Lindbladian Dynamics from Conformal Embeddings and T opological Defects in Conformal Field Theory

    X. Huang, M. Qi, J.-H. Zhang, and A. Lucas, Hy- drodynamics as the effective field theory of strong-to- weak spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. B111, 125147 (2025). 9 Supplemental Material for “Exact Lindbladian Dynamics from Conformal Embeddings and T opological Defects in Conformal Field Theory” This Supplemental Material provides detailed techni...

    2025