Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Chiral effective model of cold and dense two-color QCD: The linear sigma model approach

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The author argues that a linear sigma model built on the linear representation of the Pauli-Gürsey SU(4) symmetry reproduces the low-lying hadron mass spectrum of dense two-color QCD, including the iso-singlet negative-parity mode that…

desk verdict A useful review of the author's LSM program for dense two-color QCD, but the central 'reproduction' of the lattice spectrum is an adjustable fit rather than a validated prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04496 v1 pith:2LT2CQRU submitted 2025-02-06 hep-ph hep-latnucl-th

Daiki Suenaga This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-latnucl-th
keywords two-colorQCDlinearsigmamodelPauli-Gürseysymmetrybaryonsuperfluidphasediquarkcondensatehadronmassspectrumtopologicalsusceptibilitysoundvelocity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the right effective description of cold and dense two-color QCD in the baryon superfluid phase is a linear $\sigma$ model built on the linear representation of the Pauli-Gürsey $SU(4)$ symmetry. The central claim is that this model reproduces the low-lying hadron mass spectrum measured on the lattice over a broad range of quark chemical potential $\mu_q$, including the iso-singlet $0^-$ state that becomes the second-lightest hadron and that chiral perturbation theory cannot generate. If true, the linear $\sigma$ model extends hadronic effective theory beyond the low-energy regime where only Nambu-Goldstone bosons survive, giving a handle on the phase with diquark condensation. The review also reports LSM-based results for topological susceptibility, sound velocity, generalized Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relations, and an extension to spin-1 hadrons.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $4\times4$ matrix field $\Sigma$ built from the quark bilinear $\Phi_{ij}=\Psi_j^T\sigma_2\tau_c^2\Psi_i$, which packs all twelve spin-0 hadron fields into $\Sigma=(S^a-iP^a)X^aE$ under the Pauli-Gürsey $SU(4)$. Its transformation $\Sigma\to g\Sigma g^T$ fixes the LSM Lagrangian, with the quark chemical potential entering through a covariant derivative with the spurion field. The argument is carried by the mean-field ground state, whose gap equations reproduce the chiral perturbation theory critical chemical potential $\mu_{\rm cr}=m_\pi^{(H)}/2$, and by the $3\times3$ mass matrices that diagonalize the $U(1)_B$-violating mixing among $(P_4,P_5,\sigma)$ and $(S_4,S_5,\eta)$. The nonlinearly suppressed iso-singlet $0^-$ mass and the massless $0^+$ mode both emerge from these matrices.

What would settle it

A lattice calculation of the iso-singlet $0^-$ hadron masses at smaller diquark source $j$ and larger $\mu_q$, extrapolated to $j\to0$, that does not follow the nonlinearly suppressed lightest eigenvalue of the $\eta$--$B'$--$\bar B'$ mass matrix would falsify the LSM's central reproduction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claimed is that a linear $\sigma$ model with twelve spin-0 fields, transforming linearly under the Pauli-Gürsey $SU(4)$ symmetry, reproduces the $\mu_q$ dependence of the low-lying hadron masses in the baryon superfluid phase of two-color QCD. At mean-field level the model has a chiral condensate $\sigma_0=\langle\sigma\rangle$ and a diquark condensate $\Delta=\langle P_5\rangle$, and its $U(1)_B$-violating mixing produces a massless $0^+$ Nambu-Goldstone mode plus a nonlinearly suppressed lightest $0^-$ mode in the $\eta$--$B'$--$\bar B'$ sector. That suppression matches the lattice spectrum, whereas chiral perturbation theory, which contains only the Nambu-Goldstone bosons, has no such state. The review argues the same framework explains the sound-velocity peak and the density dependence of the topological susceptibility, and it predicts parity-partner degeneracies at high density.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison assumes that the low-lying spectrum of dense two-color QCD is saturated by the twelve spin-0 mean-field modes of the LSM and that the lattice states correspond to the LSM mass eigenstates obtained by diagonalising the $3\times3$ mixing matrices; omitted states or fluctuations would need to be negligible for the reproduction to hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the baryon superfluid phase the pion mass is $m_\pi=2\mu_q$, and the lightest $0^+$ state is the massless Goldstone mode of $U(1)_B$ breaking.
  • The lightest iso-singlet $0^-$ state is nonlinearly suppressed and becomes the second-lowest hadron, reproducing the lattice feature that chiral perturbation theory cannot describe.
  • At large $\mu_q$ the parity partners degenerate: $(\pi,\sigma)$, $(\eta,a_0)$, $(B,B')$, and $(\bar B,\bar B')$; the extended model with spin-1 hadrons predicts analogous degeneracies such as $(\rho,a_1)$ and $(\omega,f_1)$.
  • The topological susceptibility is suppressed at high density as $\chi_{\rm top}\sim\mu_q^{-2}$ when the $U(1)_A$ anomaly is modest, and the suppression is weakened if the anomaly is enhanced.
  • The sound velocity develops a peak above the conformal value $1/3$ and then approaches $1/3$ from above, in line with lattice data, while the ChPT curve rises monotonically without a peak.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same $3\times3$ mixing structure should control other $U(1)_B$-violating observables in the superfluid phase, such as diquark spectral functions and finite-momentum correlation functions, which lattice simulations could test directly.
  • The eLSM prediction of a possible axialvector condensed phase for one parameter set is a sharp signature: a lattice search for anisotropic, $SO(3)$-violating condensates at high $\mu_q$ would confirm or exclude that region of the model.
  • Because the sound-velocity peak is proportional to the inverse chiral-partner mass splitting, a lattice measurement of the $\sigma$ and $a_0$ masses in the superfluid phase would indirectly constrain the equation of state; if those masses deviate from the LSM values, the peak prediction would need revision.
  • The author notes the LSM can be translated to isospin-dense QCD; extending this construction to three-color isospin matter, where the sign problem also disappears, could give a hadronic model for the neutron-star-relevant equation of state, though that step is not carried out here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review-style paper presenting a linear sigma model (LSM) for dense two-color QCD (QC2D), built on the Pauli-Gürsey SU(4) symmetry. It derives Ward-Takahashi identities and GOR relations, reviews the chiral perturbation theory benchmark, constructs the LSM with 12 spin-0 hadron fields, and uses it to study the phase structure, the finite-chemical-potential hadron spectrum, topological susceptibility, and sound velocity. An extended version including spin-1 hadrons is also summarized. The central claim is that the LSM successfully reproduces the low-lying hadron mass spectrum of dense QC2D seen in lattice simulations, in particular the nonlinearly suppressed iso-singlet 0− mode that chiral perturbation theory cannot describe. The paper also presents predictions for the diquark-source dependence, topological susceptibility, sound-velocity peak, and spin-1 mass ordering.

Significance. If the central claim held, the LSM would be a genuinely useful hadronic effective model for the baryon superfluid phase of QC2D beyond the low-energy ChPT regime, with concrete predictions for the 0− channel, topological susceptibility, sound velocity, and spin-1 spectra. The paper contains a number of correct and useful algebraic results: the WTI/GOR derivations in Sec. II are internally consistent, the LSM mass formulas and 3x3 mixing matrices in Eqs. (153)-(154) are explicitly given, and the sound-velocity formula (189) isolates the chiral-partner contribution in a transparent way. The strength of the paper is that the LSM framework is fully specified and the calculations are reproducible from the given formulas. However, the central validation against lattice data is weakened by parameter calibration using the same lattice masses that are later compared, and by the acknowledged need to tune the U(1)_A anomaly strength to reproduce the signature suppression. These issues make the present form of the central claim stronger than the evidence supports.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV.C, Eqs. (148)-(150) and Figs. 5-6] The parameters lambda2=65.6, m0^2=-(693 MeV)^2 and m_q cbar=(456 MeV)^3 are fixed by requiring the vacuum masses m_pi^(H)=738 MeV and m_B'^(H)=1611 MeV taken from the same lattice work [41] whose finite-mu_q spectra are then used for the comparison. The reproduction of those two vacuum masses is therefore true by construction and provides no independent support for the model. The genuine test is only the mu_q dependence of the remaining states, yet no quantitative measure (chi-squared, confidence bands, or a list of excluded fitted observables) is given. The authors should either determine the vacuum inputs from independent lattice data or present a comparison that explicitly separates fitted inputs from predicted outputs.
  2. [Sec. IV.C, paragraph after Fig. 6] The text concedes that with a=c1=c2=0 the LSM predicts a substantial mass reduction of the lightest 0- mixed state, whereas the lattice shows a rather mild suppression, and that agreement is recovered only by enhancing the U(1)_A anomaly terms whose strength is chosen to approach the correct behavior and deferred to Ref. [44]. Since the anomaly coefficient is not fixed by independent inputs, the central claimed success--reproduction of the nonlinearly suppressed 0- mode--is controlled by a free parameter tuned to the observable under study. A falsifiable comparison would fix the anomaly strength independently, for example from the vacuum eta mass or from the topological susceptibility, and then compare the mu_q dependence of the 0- mode with lattice data including error bars.
  3. [Sec. IV.C and Fig. 6] The lattice masses in Fig. 6 were obtained at nonzero diquark source j, while the LSM curves are computed at j=0. The paper notes that some artifacts originating from a finite diquark source contaminate the spectra, but it does not quantify the extrapolation j->0. Without an estimate of the systematic shift, visual agreement between j=0 model curves and j!=0 lattice data cannot be taken as a quantitative reproduction. The same caveat applies to the eLSM comparison in Sec. V.B, where the spin-1 parameters are additionally tuned to reproduce the rho-meson mass reduction.
  4. [Sec. IV.F, final paragraph] The paper states that for quantitative comparisons it is inevitable to include fluctuations and spin-1-hadron contributions. This is an explicit limitation of the mean-field mass calculation that underlies the central spectrum claim. The conclusions should either be rescaled to a qualitative level or accompanied by an estimate of the size of the omitted fluctuation and higher-state effects in the computed masses.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains the typo 'hardon mass spectrum' and should read 'hadron mass spectrum'.
  2. [Sec. II.B] The subsection heading contains 'Pauri-Gürsey'; this should be 'Pauli-Gürsey'.
  3. [Sec. III.D] The text 'baed on the effective potential' should read 'based on the effective potential'.
  4. [Sec. IV.E] In the sentence introducing chi_pi and chi_eta, 'the spurious pa' should be 'the spurion fields pa'.
  5. [Eq. (150)] The notation m_q cbar is used without a prior definition of cbar as distinct from the field σ̃ or the parameter appearing in Eq. (137); the paper should define this combination explicitly.
  6. [Fig. 6] Since Fig. 6 is reproduced from Ref. [41], the caption should state the relevant lattice parameters (beta, lattice volume, and diquark-source value) or refer precisely to the source panel so that the reader can judge the j!=0 contamination.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Central spectrum claim is calibrated on the same lattice data and the 0- suppression is recovered by tuning U(1)_A anomaly strength in self-cited work.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. IV.B-C, Eqs. (148)-(150) and Fig. 5]
    "adopted m(H)π = 738 MeV, m(H)B′( ¯B′) = 1611 MeV, as inputs from the measured hadron masses on the lattice [41]. ... Besides, the nonlinear mass suppression of the lightest mode of the η-B′- ¯B′ mixed state which was observed by the lattice simulation [41] is successfully reproduced."

    Equations (150) are the parameter set resulting from the vacuum inputs (148)-(149): mπ^(H) and mB'^(H), together with the choice σ0^(H)=250 MeV, fix m0^2, λ2 and mq c̄. Both hadron masses are quoted from Ref. [41], the same lattice work whose finite-μ spectra are compared in Sec. IV.C. The statement that the LSM 'successfully reproduces' the finite-μ spectrum is therefore not a test against an independent benchmark: the model is calibrated on vacuum masses from the same data set and the comparison only checks that the μ-dependence interpolates between fitted endpoints. Some μ-dependence, such as mπ=2μq, is genuine model content, so the circularity is partial, but the central spectrum comparison is not an out-of-sample prediction.

  2. self citation load bearing [Sec. IV.C, discussion after Fig. 6]
    "Quantitatively, the nonlinear suppression of the mass of the lightest η-B′- ¯B′ mixed state measured on the lattice is rather mild, while the present LSM result in the absence of U(1)A anomaly effects exhibits a substantial mass reduction, as shown in Figs. 5 and 6. In Ref. [44], it was demonstrated that as the U(1)A anomaly effects get enhanced within the LSM analysis, the suppression is weakened so as to approach the correct behavior measured on the lattice."

    The anomaly coefficients a, c1, c2 in Eq. (138) are free parameters not fixed by independent inputs. In the default calculation they are set to zero, and the text concedes that the LSM then gives a substantial mass reduction while the lattice suppression is rather mild. Agreement for the very state that motivates the paper is recovered only by enhancing anomaly strength, with the only cited demonstration being the same-author reference [44]. The signature 0- behavior is therefore controlled by an adjustable parameter tuned against the lattice data it is claimed to reproduce; the load-bearing evidence is a self-citation rather than a parameter-free external computation.

1 more flagged steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. V.B, Eq. (204) and Figs. 13-14]
    "we will adopt m(H)ρ = 908 MeV, m(H)a1 = 1614 MeV, as inputs associated with the spin-1 hadron masses simulated on the lattice [41, 79], in addition to the inputs (148) and (149). Hence, there remains only two free parameters, C and gΦ. ... the parameters are tuned to reproduce the mass reduction of ρ meson in the superfluid phase measured on the lattice."

    The eLSM vacuum spin-1 masses are taken from the same lattice sources [41,79] that supply the finite-μ spectra, and the two remaining parameters C and gΦ are then tuned to reproduce the ρ-meson mass reduction seen on the lattice. Thus the apparent agreement of the eLSM spin-1 curves is a fit to the target data, not a prediction from independently fixed parameters. The review presents this as an existence of parameter choices, so it is a supporting example rather than the central claim, but it follows the same closed validation loop.

full rationale

The paper contains real independent content: the pion relation mπ=2μq in the superfluid phase follows from the model without fitting, the μq^-2 tail of the topological susceptibility is derived rather than fitted, and the sound-velocity peak is a structural consequence of including the chiral partner. However, the central validation in Sec. IV.C is not a clean out-of-sample test. The LSM parameters λ2, m0^2 and mq c̄ are fixed by vacuum hadron masses taken from lattice Ref. [41], and the same Ref. [41] supplies the finite-μ spectra that the LSM is said to reproduce. More importantly, the paper itself states that the anomaly-free LSM over-suppresses the lightest 0- state relative to the lattice, and that the agreement is obtained only when U(1)_A anomaly effects are enhanced, with the demonstration relegated to the same-author Ref. [44]. That makes the signature phenomenon of the central claim an adjustable fit rather than a parameter-free prediction. The eLSM spin-1 section repeats this pattern by tuning C and gΦ to reproduce the lattice ρ-mass reduction. Taking all this together, the validation loop is partly closed, but not fully: the μ-dependence of several quantities is still model-generated and not simply equivalent to the inputs. A score of 6 captures this partial circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central model depends on fitted couplings and standard effective-field-theory assumptions. The main free parameters are fixed to hadronic-phase masses and a typical chiral condensate, then used to predict mu_q dependence; the anomaly strength and eLSM couplings are treated as adjustable to match lattice observations.

free parameters (6)
  • lambda2 quartic coupling = 65.6
    Fixed in Sec. IV.B using the lattice inputs m_pi^(H)=738 MeV and m_B'^(H)=1611 MeV; controls masses of a0, eta, and spin-1 partners.
  • m0^2 mass parameter = -(693 MeV)^2
    Set together with lambda2 to reproduce the hadronic pion mass; used in all LSM mass formulas in Eq. (151).
  • mq cbar combination = (456 MeV)^3
    Combination of quark mass and LSM source coupling fixed by m_pi^(H); enters gap equations and condensate formulas (Eq. 150).
  • sigma0^(H) chiral condensate VEV = 250 MeV
    Chosen as a typical value in Sec. IV.B to fix the remaining parameter; not derived from first principles or lattice data.
  • U(1)A anomaly strength / m_eta^(H)/m_pi^(H) = 1.0, 1.05, 1.2, 1.5 and varied
    Scanned in Sec. IV.E for topological susceptibility, and described in Sec. IV.C as adjustable to approach the lattice mass suppression.
  • eLSM parameters C and g_Phi = sets such as C=12, g_Phi=10; C=8, g_Phi=10; C=16, g_Phi=10
    Tuned in Sec. V.B to reproduce the measured rho meson mass reduction; different values yield different spectra and phase possibilities.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Pauli-Gürsey SU(2Nf) symmetry of QC2D for massless quarks
    Derived from the pseudoreality of SU(2)c in Sec. II.A; it is the framework's starting point.
  • domain assumption Effective theory matches QC2D via Gamma_QC2D = Gamma_eff (Eq. 2)
    Stated in Sec. I as the matching condition; all model predictions depend on this identification.
  • domain assumption Spontaneous breaking SU(4) to Sp(4) with chiral and diquark condensates, with Sigma transforming as g Sigma g^T
    Sec. II and IV.A; standard for QC2D effective models, but assumed rather than derived from the underlying theory.
  • ad hoc to paper Mean-field approximation for ground state and hadron masses
    Phase structure and masses come from the classical potential and tree-level quadratic terms in Secs. IV.B-C; fluctuations and loop corrections are omitted, with systematics admitted to be obscure.
  • domain assumption lambda1=0 from large-Nc suppression
    Invoked in Sec. IV.B following large-Nc counting [80], and extended to eLSM via lambda1=h1=g6=g7=0.
  • domain assumption U(1)A anomaly couplings a=c1=c2=0 in the vacuum
    Sec. IV.A notes the latest lattice result seems to imply m_eta^(H)/m_pi^(H) close to unity, but the supporting citation [79] is in preparation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral effective model of cold and dense two-color QCD: The linear sigma model approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2LT2CQRU

@misc{pith2026250204496,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral effective model of cold and dense two-color QCD: The linear sigma model approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2LT2CQRU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04496}
}
abstract

This review is devoted to summarizing recent developments of the linear sigma model (LSM) in cold and dense two-color QCD (QC$_2$D), in which lattice simulations are straightforwardly applicable thanks to the disappearance of the sign problem. In QC$_2$D, both theoretical and numerical studies derive the presence of the so-called baryon superfluid phase at sufficiently large chemical potential ($\mu_q$), where diquark condensates govern the ground state. The hadron mass spectrum simulated in this phase shows that the mass of an iso-singlet ($I=0$) and $0^-$ state is remarkably reduced, but such a mode cannot be described by the chiral perturbation theory. Motivated by this fact, I invent the LSM constructed upon the linear representation of chiral symmetry, or more precisely the Pauli-G\"ursey symmetry. Then, it is shown that my LSM successfully reproduces the low-lying hadron mass spectrum in a broad range of $\mu_q$ simulated on the lattice. As applications of the LSM, topological susceptibility and sound velocity in cold and dense QC$_2$D are evaluated to compare with lattice results. Besides, generalized Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation and hardon mass spectrum in the presence of a diquark source are analyzed. I also introduce an extended version of the LSM incorporating spin-$1$ hadrons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04496 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: A schematic phase diagram of QC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In plotting this figure we have used the large-Nc suppression [80] for the parameters, i.e., λ1 = 0, and adopted m(H) π = 738 MeV , m (H) B′(B¯′) = 1611 MeV , (148) as inputs from the measured hadron masses on the lattice [41]. In addition, σ (H) 0 = 250 MeV (149) has …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Mass spectra of 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Mass spectra of 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The lattice result on the sound velocity at finite chemical potential. This figure is taken [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: ¯µ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: indicates that only σ0 is finite in the hadronic phase whereas the remaining mean fields are always vanishing there. In the superfluid phase induced by a nonzero ∆, the spin-1 mean fields ¯ω and V¯ also acquire their non-vanishing values. In particular, ¯ω grows linea…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Speed of sound peak in two-color dense QCD: confronting effective models with lattice data

    hep-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A medium-separated NJL model reproduces the lattice-observed peak in the speed of sound for two-color dense QCD, where conventional cutoff regularization fails.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [41]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler. Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark. Nucl. Phys. B, 250:465–516, 1985

    work page 1985

  2. [44]

    Measurement of hadron masses in 2-color finite density QCD

    Kotaro Murakami, Daiki Suenaga, Kei Iida, and Etsuko Itou. Measurement of hadron masses in 2-color finite density QCD. PoS, LATTICE2022:154, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [1]

    ibBoxAyorzyIk19cBcdm+QBnv/Q=

    + ˜λ 4 (σ2 0 + ∆2)2 − √ 2¯c(mqσ0 + j∆) , (144) where ˜λ = (4 λ1 + λ2)/4. The phase structures, i.e., µq dependences of σ0 and ∆ are determined by finding stationary points of this potential with respect to these mean fields: m2 π − √ 2¯cmq σ0 ! σ0 = 0 , m2 π − 4µ2 q − √ 2¯cj ∆ ! ∆ = 0 , (145) from which the pion mass at any µq reads m2 π = m2 0 + ˜λ(σ2 0 ...

  4. [2]

    inverse mass hierarchy

    In this equation m(H) π 2 = m2 0 + ˜λ σ(H) 0 2 , m(H) σ 2 = m2 0 + 3˜λ σ(H) 0 2 , (184) are the masses of pion and sigma meson in the hadronic phase, so that δ ¯m2 σ−π = 2˜λ σ(H) 0 2 µ2 cr . (185) Thus, in a limit of µq → ∞we can see δp → µ4 q/˜λ which dominates over the ChPT result psub ChPT and psub LSM → 1 ˜λ µ4 q . (186) This scaling is indeed consist...

  5. [3]

    Finite-density lattice QCD and sign problem: Current status and open problems

    Keitaro Nagata. Finite-density lattice QCD and sign problem: Current status and open problems. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 127:103991, 2022

    2022

  6. [4]

    Powell, Yifan Song, and Tatsuyuki Takatsuka

    Gordon Baym, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Toru Kojo, Philip D. Powell, Yifan Song, and Tatsuyuki Takatsuka. From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review. Rept. Prog. Phys., 81(5):056902, 2018

    2018

  7. [5]

    (177) Here we have defined the following composite operator of the negative-parity diquark: OB′ 5 = − 1 2 ψT Cτ 2 c τ 2 f ψ + H.c

    (176) The first contribution represents a mixed effect from baryonic and mesonic sector propor- tional to mqj while the second one does a pure baryonic effect proportional to j2, with the susceptibilities defined by χB′ 5η = Z d4x⟨0|TOη(x)OB′ 5(0)|0⟩ , χB4 = Z d4x⟨0|TOB4(x)OB4(0)|0⟩ , χB′ 5 = Z d4x⟨0|TOB′ 5(x)OB′ 5(0)|0⟩ . (177) Here we have defined the f...

  8. [6]

    Introductory lectures on lattice QCD at nonzero baryon number

    Gert Aarts. Introductory lectures on lattice QCD at nonzero baryon number. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 706(2):022004, 2016

    2016

Show all 116 references
  1. [7]

    Kogut, Maria-Paola Lombardo, and Susan E

    Simon Hands, John B. Kogut, Maria-Paola Lombardo, and Susan E. Morrison. Symmetries and spectrum of SU(2) lattice gauge theory at finite chemical potential. Nucl. Phys. B, 558:327–346, 1999. 6 In three-color QCD, lattice studies on the diquarks by means of, e.g., gauge-fixing ...

    1999

  2. [8]

    J. B. Kogut, D. K. Sinclair, S. J. Hands, and S. E. Morrison. Two color QCD at nonzero quark number density. Phys. Rev. D, 64:094505, 2001

    2001

  3. [9]

    Diquark condensation in dense adjoint matter

    Simon Hands, Istvan Montvay, Luigi Scorzato, and Jonivar Skullerud. Diquark condensation in dense adjoint matter. Eur. Phys. J. C, 22:451–461, 2001

    2001

  4. [10]

    Behavior of hadrons at finite density: Lattice study of color SU(2) QCD

    Shin Muroya, Atsushi Nakamura, and Chiho Nonaka. Behavior of hadrons at finite density: Lattice study of color SU(2) QCD. Phys. Lett. B, 551:305–310, 2003

    2003

  5. [11]

    Lattice QCD at finite density: An Introductory review

    Shin Muroya, Atsushi Nakamura, Chiho Nonaka, and Tetsuya Takaishi. Lattice QCD at finite density: An Introductory review. Prog. Theor. Phys., 110:615–668, 2003

    2003

  6. [12]

    Phase-diagram of two-color lattice QCD in the chiral limit

    Shailesh Chandrasekharan and Fu-Jiun Jiang. Phase-diagram of two-color lattice QCD in the chiral limit. Phys. Rev. D, 74:014506, 2006

    2006

  7. [13]

    Deconfinement in dense 2-color QCD

    Simon Hands, Seyong Kim, and Jon-Ivar Skullerud. Deconfinement in dense 2-color QCD. Eur. Phys. J. C, 48:193, 2006

    2006

  8. [14]

    Hadron Spectrum in a Two-Colour Baryon-Rich Medium

    Simon Hands, Peter Sitch, and Jon-Ivar Skullerud. Hadron Spectrum in a Two-Colour Baryon-Rich Medium. Phys. Lett. B, 662:405–412, 2008

    2008

  9. [15]

    A Quarkyonic Phase in Dense Two Color Matter? Phys

    Simon Hands, Seyong Kim, and Jon-Ivar Skullerud. A Quarkyonic Phase in Dense Two Color Matter? Phys. Rev. D, 81:091502, 2010

    2010

  10. [16]

    Towards the phase diagram of dense two-color matter

    Seamus Cotter, Pietro Giudice, Simon Hands, and Jon-Ivar Skullerud. Towards the phase diagram of dense two-color matter. Phys. Rev. D, 87(3):034507, 2013

    2013

  11. [17]

    Non-relativistic spectrum of two-color QCD at non-zero baryon density

    Simon Hands, Seyong Kim, and Jon-Ivar Skullerud. Non-relativistic spectrum of two-color QCD at non-zero baryon density. Phys. Lett. B, 711:199–204, 2012

    2012

  12. [18]

    Phase transitions and gluodynamics in 2-colour matter at high density

    Tamer Boz, Seamus Cotter, Leonard Fister, Dhagash Mehta, and Jon-Ivar Skullerud. Phase transitions and gluodynamics in 2-colour matter at high density. Eur. Phys. J. A, 49:87, 2013

    2013

  13. [19]

    V. V. Braguta, E. M. Ilgenfritz, A. Yu. Kotov, A. V. Molochkov, and A. A. Nikolaev. Study of the phase diagram of dense two-color QCD within lattice simulation. Phys. Rev. D, 94(11):114510, 2016

    2016

  14. [20]

    Puhr and P

    M. Puhr and P. V. Buividovich. Numerical Study of Nonperturbative Corrections to the Chiral Separation Effect in Quenched Finite-Density QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(19):192003, 2017

    2017

  15. [21]

    Finite-density gauge correlation functions in QC2D

    Tamer Boz, Ouraman Hajizadeh, Axel Maas, and Jon-Ivar Skullerud. Finite-density gauge correlation functions in QC2D. Phys. Rev. D, 99(7):074514, 2019. 56

    2019

  16. [22]

    N. Yu. Astrakhantsev, V. G. Bornyakov, V. V. Braguta, E. M. Ilgenfritz, A. Yu. Kotov, A. A. Nikolaev, and A. Rothkopf. Lattice study of static quark-antiquark interactions in dense quark matter. JHEP, 05:171, 2019

    2019

  17. [23]

    Two-colour QCD phases and the topology at low temperature and high density

    Kei Iida, Etsuko Itou, and Tong-Gyu Lee. Two-colour QCD phases and the topology at low temperature and high density. JHEP, 01:181, 2020

    2020

  18. [24]

    Continuum Goldstone spectrum of two-color QCD at finite density with staggered quarks

    Jonas Wilhelm, Lukas Holicki, Dominik Smith, Bj¨ orn Wellegehausen, and Lorenz von Smekal. Continuum Goldstone spectrum of two-color QCD at finite density with staggered quarks. Phys. Rev. D, 100(11):114507, 2019

    2019

  19. [25]

    Dense two-color QCD towards continuum and chiral limits

    Tamer Boz, Pietro Giudice, Simon Hands, and Jon-Ivar Skullerud. Dense two-color QCD towards continuum and chiral limits. Phys. Rev. D, 101(7):074506, 2020

    2020

  20. [26]

    P. V. Buividovich, D. Smith, and L. von Smekal. Numerical study of the chiral separation effect in two-color QCD at finite density. Phys. Rev. D, 104(1):014511, 2021

    2021

  21. [27]

    Relative scale setting for two-color QCD with Nf =2 Wilson fermions

    Kei Iida, Etsuko Itou, and Tong-Gyu Lee. Relative scale setting for two-color QCD with Nf =2 Wilson fermions. PTEP, 2021(1):013B05, 2021

    2021

  22. [28]

    Astrakhantsev, V

    N. Astrakhantsev, V. V. Braguta, E. M. Ilgenfritz, A. Yu. Kotov, and A. A. Nikolaev. Lattice study of thermodynamic properties of dense QC 2D. Phys. Rev. D, 102(7):074507, 2020

    2020

  23. [29]

    V. G. Bornyakov, V. V. Braguta, A. A. Nikolaev, and R. N. Rogalyov. Effects of Dense Quark Matter on Gluon Propagators in Lattice QC 2D. Phys. Rev. D, 102:114511, 2020

    2020

  24. [30]

    P. V. Buividovich, D. Smith, and L. von Smekal. Electric conductivity in finite-density SU (2) lattice gauge theory with dynamical fermions. Phys. Rev. D, 102(9):094510, 2020

    2020

  25. [31]

    P. V. Buividovich, D. Smith, and L. von Smekal. Static magnetic susceptibility in finite- density SU (2) lattice gauge theory. Eur. Phys. J. A, 57(10):293, 2021

    2021

  26. [32]

    Begun, V

    A. Begun, V. G. Bornyakov, N. V. Gerasimeniuk, V. A. Goy, A. Nakamura, R. N. Roga- lyov, and V. Vovchenko. Quark Density in Lattice QC 2D at Imaginary and Real Chemical Potential. 3 2021

    2021

  27. [33]

    Velocity of Sound beyond the High-Density Relativistic Limit from Lattice Simulation of Dense Two-Color QCD

    Kei Iida and Etsuko Itou. Velocity of Sound beyond the High-Density Relativistic Limit from Lattice Simulation of Dense Two-Color QCD. 7 2022

    2022

  28. [34]

    Begun, V

    A. Begun, V. G. Bornyakov, V. A. Goy, A. Nakamura, and R. N. Rogalyov. Study of two color QCD on large lattices. Phys. Rev. D, 105(11):114505, 2022

    2022

  29. [35]

    Chemical potential (in)dependence of hadron scatterings in the hadronic phase of QCD-like theories and its applications

    Kotaro Murakami, Etsuko Itou, and Kei Iida. Chemical potential (in)dependence of hadron scatterings in the hadronic phase of QCD-like theories and its applications. 9 2023. 57

    2023

  30. [36]

    Victor V. Braguta. Phase Diagram of Dense Two-Color QCD at Low Temperatures. Symmetry, 15(7):1466, 2023

    2023

  31. [37]

    Lattice study on finite density QC2D towards zero temperature

    Kei Iida, Etsuko Itou, Kotaro Murakami, and Daiki Suenaga. Lattice study on finite density QC2D towards zero temperature. JHEP, 10:022, 2024

    2024

  32. [38]

    W. Pauli. On the conservation of the Lepton charge. Nuovo Cim., 6(1):204–215, 1957

    1957

  33. [39]

    Relation of charge independence and baryon conservation to Pauli’s transfor- mation

    Feza G¨ ursey. Relation of charge independence and baryon conservation to Pauli’s transfor- mation. Nuovo Cim., 7(3):411–415, 1958

    1958

  34. [40]

    Gasser and H

    J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler. Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop. Annals Phys., 158:142, 1984

    1984

  35. [42]

    J. B. Kogut, Misha A. Stephanov, and D. Toublan. On two color QCD with baryon chemical potential. Phys. Lett. B, 464:183–191, 1999

    1999

  36. [43]

    J. B. Kogut, Misha A. Stephanov, D. Toublan, J. J. M. Verbaarschot, and A. Zhitnitsky. QCD - like theories at finite baryon density. Nucl. Phys. B, 582:477–513, 2000

    2000

  37. [45]

    Coleman, J

    Sidney R. Coleman, J. Wess, and Bruno Zumino. Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians

  38. [46]

    Rev., 177:2239–2247, 1969

    Phys. Rev., 177:2239–2247, 1969

    1969

  39. [47]

    Callan, Jr., Sidney R

    Curtis G. Callan, Jr., Sidney R. Coleman, J. Wess, and Bruno Zumino. Structure of phe- nomenological Lagrangians. 2. Phys. Rev., 177:2247–2250, 1969

    1969

  40. [48]

    Probing the hadron mass spectrum in dense two-color QCD with the linear sigma model

    Daiki Suenaga, Kotaro Murakami, Etsuko Itou, and Kei Iida. Probing the hadron mass spectrum in dense two-color QCD with the linear sigma model. Phys. Rev. D, 107(5):054001, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    J. T. Lenaghan, F. Sannino, and K. Splittorff. The Superfluid and conformal phase transitions of two color QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 65:054002, 2002

    2002

  42. [50]

    Splittorff, D

    K. Splittorff, D. Toublan, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot. Diquark condensate in QCD with two colors at next-to-leading order. Nucl. Phys. B, 620:290–314, 2002

    2002

  43. [51]

    Thermodynamics of two-colour QCD and the Nambu Jona-Lasinio model

    Claudia Ratti and Wolfram Weise. Thermodynamics of two-colour QCD and the Nambu Jona-Lasinio model. Phys. Rev. D, 70:054013, 2004

    2004

  44. [52]

    BEC-BCS crossover in the Nambu-Jona- 58 Lasinio model of QCD

    Gao-feng Sun, Lianyi He, and Pengfei Zhuang. BEC-BCS crossover in the Nambu-Jona- 58 Lasinio model of QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 75:096004, 2007

    2007

  45. [53]

    Larkin-Ovchinnikov-Fulde-Ferrell state in two-color quark matter

    Kenji Fukushima and Kei Iida. Larkin-Ovchinnikov-Fulde-Ferrell state in two-color quark matter. Phys. Rev. D, 76:054004, 2007

    2007

  46. [54]

    Two-color quark matter: U(1)(A) restoration, superfluidity, and quarkyonic phase

    Tomas Brauner, Kenji Fukushima, and Yoshimasa Hidaka. Two-color quark matter: U(1)(A) restoration, superfluidity, and quarkyonic phase. Phys. Rev. D, 80:074035, 2009. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 81, 119904 (2010)]

    2010

  47. [55]

    Chiral Lagrangian and spectral sum rules for dense two-color QCD

    Takuya Kanazawa, Tilo Wettig, and Naoki Yamamoto. Chiral Lagrangian and spectral sum rules for dense two-color QCD. JHEP, 08:003, 2009

    2009

  48. [56]

    Masses of vector bosons in two- color dense QCD based on the hidden local symmetry

    Masayasu Harada, Chiho Nonaka, and Tetsuro Yamaoka. Masses of vector bosons in two- color dense QCD based on the hidden local symmetry. Phys. Rev. D, 81:096003, 2010

    2010

  49. [57]

    Andersen and Tomas Brauner

    Jens O. Andersen and Tomas Brauner. Phase diagram of two-color quark matter at nonzero baryon and isospin density. Phys. Rev. D, 81:096004, 2010

    2010

  50. [58]

    Tian Zhang, Tomas Brauner, and Dirk H. Rischke. QCD-like theories at nonzero temperature and density. JHEP, 06:064, 2010

    2010

  51. [59]

    Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model description of weakly interacting Bose condensate and BEC-BCS crossover in dense QCD-like theories

    Lianyi He. Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model description of weakly interacting Bose condensate and BEC-BCS crossover in dense QCD-like theories. Phys. Rev. D, 82:096003, 2010

    2010

  52. [60]

    Quark-meson-diquark model for two-color QCD

    Nils Strodthoff, Bernd-Jochen Schaefer, and Lorenz von Smekal. Quark-meson-diquark model for two-color QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 85:074007, 2012

    2012

  53. [61]

    Quark-Hadron Matter at Finite Tempera- ture and Density in a Two-Color PNJL model

    Shotaro Imai, Hiroshi Toki, and Wolfram Weise. Quark-Hadron Matter at Finite Tempera- ture and Density in a Two-Color PNJL model. Nucl. Phys. A, 913:71–102, 2013

    2013

  54. [62]

    Polyakov-Quark-Meson-Diquark Model for two-color QCD

    Nils Strodthoff and Lorenz von Smekal. Polyakov-Quark-Meson-Diquark Model for two-color QCD. Phys. Lett. B, 731:350–357, 2014

    2014

  55. [63]

    Pawlowski, Fabian Rennecke, and Michael M

    Naseemuddin Khan, Jan M. Pawlowski, Fabian Rennecke, and Michael M. Scherer. The Phase Diagram of QC2D from Functional Methods. 12 2015

    2015

  56. [64]

    Duarte, P

    Dyana C. Duarte, P. G. Allen, R. L. S. Farias, Pedro H. A. Manso, Rudnei O. Ramos, and N. N. Scoccola. BEC-BCS crossover in a cold and magnetized two color NJL model. Phys. Rev. D, 93(2):025017, 2016

    2016

  57. [65]

    Phase diagram of two-color QCD matter at finite baryon and axial isospin densities

    Jingyi Chao. Phase diagram of two-color QCD matter at finite baryon and axial isospin densities. Chin. Phys. C, 44(3):034108, 2020

    2020

  58. [66]

    Beleznay, and Massimo Mannarelli

    Prabal Adhikari, Soma B. Beleznay, and Massimo Mannarelli. Finite Density Two Color Chiral Perturbation Theory Revisited. Eur. Phys. J. C, 78(6):441, 2018. 59

    2018

  59. [67]

    Romain Contant and Markus Q. Huber. Dense two-color QCD from Dyson-Schwinger equa- tions. Phys. Rev. D, 101(1):014016, 2020

    2020

  60. [68]

    Gluon propagator in two-color dense QCD: Massive Yang- Mills approach at one-loop

    Daiki Suenaga and Toru Kojo. Gluon propagator in two-color dense QCD: Massive Yang- Mills approach at one-loop. Phys. Rev. D, 100(7):076017, 2019

    2019

  61. [69]

    T. G. Khunjua, K. G. Klimenko, and R. N. Zhokhov. The dual properties of chiral and isospin asymmetric dense quark matter formed of two-color quarks. JHEP, 06:148, 2020

    2020

  62. [70]

    Thermal quarks and gluon propagators in two-color dense QCD

    Toru Kojo and Daiki Suenaga. Thermal quarks and gluon propagators in two-color dense QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 103(9):094008, 2021

    2021

  63. [71]

    Delineating chiral separation effect in two-color dense QCD

    Daiki Suenaga and Toru Kojo. Delineating chiral separation effect in two-color dense QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 104(3):034038, 2021

    2021

  64. [72]

    Peaks of sound velocity in two color dense QCD: Quark saturation effects and semishort range correlations

    Toru Kojo and Daiki Suenaga. Peaks of sound velocity in two color dense QCD: Quark saturation effects and semishort range correlations. Phys. Rev. D, 105(7):076001, 2022

    2022

  65. [73]

    T. G. Khunjua, K. G. Klimenko, and R. N. Zhokhov. Influence of chiral chemical potential µ5 on phase structure of the two-color quark matter. Phys. Rev. D, 106(4):045008, 2022

    2022

  66. [74]

    Fate of the topological susceptibility in two-color dense QCD

    Mamiya Kawaguchi and Daiki Suenaga. Fate of the topological susceptibility in two-color dense QCD. JHEP, 08:189, 2023

    2023

  67. [75]

    Mass spectrum of spin-one hadrons in dense two-color QCD: Novel predictions by extended linear sigma model

    Daiki Suenaga, Kotaro Murakami, Etsuko Itou, and Kei Iida. Mass spectrum of spin-one hadrons in dense two-color QCD: Novel predictions by extended linear sigma model. Phys. Rev. D, 109(7):074031, 2024

    2024

  68. [76]

    Sound velocity peak induced by the chiral partner in dense two-color QCD

    Mamiya Kawaguchi and Daiki Suenaga. Sound velocity peak induced by the chiral partner in dense two-color QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 109(9):096034, 2024

    2024

  69. [77]

    Matrix model of two-color one-flavor QCD: The ultrastrong coupling regime

    Nirmalendu Acharyya, Prasanjit Aich, Arkajyoti Bandyopadhyay, and Sachindeo Vaidya. Matrix model of two-color one-flavor QCD: The ultrastrong coupling regime. Phys. Rev. D, 110(5):054016, 2024

    2024

  70. [78]

    T. G. Khunjua, K. G. Klimenko, and R. N. Zhokhov. Dual symmetries of dense three and two-color QCD and some QCD-like NJL models. 3 2024

    2024

  71. [79]

    Cheng and L.F

    T.P. Cheng and L.F. Li. GAUGE THEORY OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLE PHYSICS. Oxford University Press, 1995

    1995

  72. [80]

    Nonlinear Realization and Hidden Local Symmetries

    Masako Bando, Taichiro Kugo, and Koichi Yamawaki. Nonlinear Realization and Hidden Local Symmetries. Phys. Rept., 164:217–314, 1988

    1988

  73. [81]

    D. T. Son and Misha A. Stephanov. QCD at finite isospin density: From pion to quark - 60 anti-quark condensation. Phys. Atom. Nucl., 64:834–842, 2001

    2001

  74. [82]

    Hidden local symmetry at loop: A New perspective of composite gauge boson and chiral phase transition

    Masayasu Harada and Koichi Yamawaki. Hidden local symmetry at loop: A New perspective of composite gauge boson and chiral phase transition. Phys. Rept., 381:1–233, 2003

    2003

  75. [83]

    in preparation

    Kotaro Murakami, Daiki Suenaga, Etsuko Itou, and Kei Iida. in preparation

  76. [84]

    Baryons in the 1/n Expansion

    Edward Witten. Baryons in the 1/n Expansion. Nucl. Phys. B, 160:57–115, 1979

    1979

  77. [85]

    Fejos and A

    G. Fejos and A. Hosaka. Thermal properties and evolution of the UA(1) factor for 2+1 flavors. Phys. Rev. D, 94(3):036005, 2016

    2016

  78. [86]

    Fej˝ os and A

    G. Fej˝ os and A. Hosaka. Mesonic and nucleon fluctuation effects at finite baryon density. Phys. Rev. D, 95:116011, 2017

    2017

  79. [87]

    Topological Aspects of Dense Matter: Lattice Studies

    Maria Paola Lombardo. Topological Aspects of Dense Matter: Lattice Studies. Universe, 7(9):336, 2021

    2021

  80. [88]

    Path Integral Measure for Gauge Invariant Fermion Theories

    Kazuo Fujikawa. Path Integral Measure for Gauge Invariant Fermion Theories. Phys. Rev. Lett., 42:1195–1198, 1979

    1979

  81. [89]

    Denis Parganlija, Francesco Giacosa, and Dirk H. Rischke. Vacuum Properties of Mesons in a Linear Sigma Model with Vector Mesons and Global Chiral Invariance. Phys. Rev. D, 82:054024, 2010

    2010

  82. [90]

    Denis Parganlija, Peter Kovacs, Gyorgy Wolf, Francesco Giacosa, and Dirk H. Rischke. Meson vacuum phenomenology in a three-flavor linear sigma model with (axial-)vector mesons.Phys. Rev. D, 87(1):014011, 2013

    2013

  83. [91]

    D. T. Son and Misha A. Stephanov. QCD at finite isospin density. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:592– 595, 2001

    2001

  84. [92]

    Splittorff, D

    K. Splittorff, D. T. Son, and Misha A. Stephanov. QCD - like theories at finite baryon and isospin density. Phys. Rev. D, 64:016003, 2001

    2001

  85. [93]

    Thermodynamics and susceptibilities of isospin imbalanced QCD matter

    Zhen-Yan Lu, Cheng-Jun Xia, and Marco Ruggieri. Thermodynamics and susceptibilities of isospin imbalanced QCD matter. Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(1):46, 2020

    2020

  86. [94]

    Effective Lagrangian at nonzero isospin chemical potential

    Angel G´ omez Nicola and Andrea Vioque-Rodr ´ ıguez. Effective Lagrangian at nonzero isospin chemical potential. Phys. Rev. D, 106(11):114017, 2022

    2022

  87. [95]

    Brandt, Francesca Cuteri, and Gergely Endrodi

    Bastian B. Brandt, Francesca Cuteri, and Gergely Endrodi. Equation of state and speed of sound of isospin-asymmetric QCD on the lattice. JHEP, 07:055, 2023

    2023

  88. [96]

    Perry, Phiala E

    Ryan Abbott, William Detmold, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, Zohreh Davoudi, Marc Illa, As- sumpta Parre˜ no, Robert J. Perry, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Michael L. Wagman. Lattice 61 quantum chromodynamics at large isospin density. Phys. Rev. D, 108(11):114506, 2023

    2023

  89. [97]

    Perry, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, Phiala E

    Ryan Abbott, William Detmold, Marc Illa, Assumpta Parre˜ no, Robert J. Perry, Fernando Romero-L´ opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Michael L. Wagman. QCD constraints on isospin- dense matter and the nuclear equation of state. 6 2024

    2024

  90. [98]

    How Perturbative QCD Constrains the Equation of State at Neutron-Star Densities

    Oleg Komoltsev and Aleksi Kurkela. How Perturbative QCD Constrains the Equation of State at Neutron-Star Densities. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128(20):202701, 2022

    2022

  91. [99]

    From existing and new nuclear and astrophysical constraints to stringent limits on the equation of state of neutron-rich dense matter

    Hauke Koehn et al. From existing and new nuclear and astrophysical constraints to stringent limits on the equation of state of neutron-rich dense matter. 2 2024

    2024

  92. [100]

    Yonit Hochberg, Eric Kuflik, Hitoshi Murayama, Tomer Volansky, and Jay G. Wacker. Model for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles. Phys. Rev. Lett., 115(2):021301, 2015

    2015

  93. [101]

    Dark nuclei

    William Detmold, Matthew McCullough, and Andrew Pochinsky. Dark nuclei. II. Nuclear spectroscopy in two-color QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 90(11):114506, 2014

    2014

  94. [102]

    SIMP Spectroscopy

    Yonit Hochberg, Eric Kuflik, and Hitoshi Murayama. SIMP Spectroscopy. JHEP, 05:090, 2016

    2016

  95. [103]

    Perturbative unitarity of strongly interacting massive particle models

    Ayuki Kamada, Shin Kobayashi, and Takumi Kuwahara. Perturbative unitarity of strongly interacting massive particle models. JHEP, 02:217, 2023

    2023

  96. [104]

    Low-energy effective description of dark Sp(4) theories

    Suchita Kulkarni, Axel Maas, Se´ an Mee, Marco Nikolic, Josef Pradler, and Fabian Zierler. Low-energy effective description of dark Sp(4) theories. SciPost Phys., 14(3):044, 2023

    2023

  97. [105]

    Even SIMP miracles are possible

    Xiaoyong Chu, Marco Nikolic, and Josef Pradler. Even SIMP miracles are possible. Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(2):2, 2024

    2024

  98. [106]

    Scattering of dark pions in Sp(4) gauge theory

    Yannick Dengler, Axel Maas, and Fabian Zierler. Scattering of dark pions in Sp(4) gauge theory. Phys. Rev. D, 110(5):054513, 2024

    2024

  99. [107]

    Manohar, M.B

    A.V. Manohar, M.B. Wise, T. Ericson, and P.Y. Landshoff. Heavy Quark Physics. Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, 2000

    2000

  100. [108]

    Chiral effective theory of diquarks and the UA(1) anomaly

    Masayasu Harada, Yan-Rui Liu, Makoto Oka, and Kei Suzuki. Chiral effective theory of diquarks and the UA(1) anomaly. Phys. Rev. D, 101(5):054038, 2020

    2020

  101. [109]

    Axial anomaly effect on the chiral-partner structure of diquarks at high temperature

    Daiki Suenaga and Makoto Oka. Axial anomaly effect on the chiral-partner structure of diquarks at high temperature. Phys. Rev. D, 108(1):014030, 2023

    2023

  102. [110]

    Fate of Σ c, Ξ ′ c and Ω c baryons at high temperature with 62 chiral restoration

    Daiki Suenaga and Makoto Oka. Fate of Σ c, Ξ ′ c and Ω c baryons at high temperature with 62 chiral restoration. 11 2024

    2024

  103. [111]

    M. Hess, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, and I. Wetzorke. Diquark masses from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 58:111502, 1998

    1998

  104. [112]

    Alexandrou, Ph

    C. Alexandrou, Ph. de Forcrand, and B. Lucini. Evidence for diquarks in lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:222002, 2006

    2006

  105. [113]

    Diquark correlations in baryons on the lattice with overlap quarks

    Ronald Babich, Nicolas Garron, Christian Hoelbling, Joseph Howard, Laurent Lellouch, and Claudio Rebbi. Diquark correlations in baryons on the lattice with overlap quarks. Phys. Rev. D, 76:074021, 2007

    2007

  106. [114]

    Diquark mass differences from unquenched lattice QCD

    Yujiang Bi, Hao Cai, Ying Chen, Ming Gong, Zhaofeng Liu, Hao-Xue Qiao, and Yi-Bo Yang. Diquark mass differences from unquenched lattice QCD. Chin. Phys. C, 40(7):073106, 2016

    2016

  107. [115]

    Diquark properties from full QCD lattice simulations

    Anthony Francis, Philippe de Forcrand, Randy Lewis, and Kim Maltman. Diquark properties from full QCD lattice simulations. JHEP, 05:062, 2022

    2022

  108. [116]

    Quark-diquark potential and diquark mass from lattice QCD

    Kai Watanabe. Quark-diquark potential and diquark mass from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 105(7):074510, 2022. 63

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.