Pseudoscalar Screening Mass at Finite Temperature and Magnetic Field from Lattice QCD with Physical Quark Masses

Heng-Tong Ding; Jin-Biao Gu; Rishabh Thakkar; Sheng-Tai

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 11 references

Pseudoscalar Screening Mass at Finite Temperature and Magnetic Field from Lattice QCD with Physical Quark Masses

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In lattice QCD at physical quark masses, neutral pion and kaon screening masses dip to a minimum, then climb, as the magnetic field grows; the strange eta falls throughout — a pattern tied to inverse magnetic catalysis.

desk verdict A useful proceedings summary of the group's physical-quark-mass screening mass project, but the continuum estimate is under-validated and the real results live in the companion paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06216 v1 pith:RNITKNVX submitted 2025-02-10 hep-lat hep-phnucl-th

Rishabh Thakkar , Heng-Tong Ding , Jin-Biao Gu , Sheng-Tai This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-lathep-phnucl-th PACS 12.38.Gc

keywords latticeQCDscreeningmasspseudoscalarmesonsmagneticfieldinversecatalysiscontinuumextrapolationHISQactionchiralsymmetryrestoration

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to establish how the screening masses of neutral pseudoscalar mesons behave in a quark-gluon plasma that is both hot and threaded by a magnetic field, using (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD with physical quark masses and continuum estimates from three lattice spacings. Its central result is that the neutral pion and kaon screening masses are non-monotonic in the field: they fall as $eB$ grows from zero, pass through a minimum, and then rise, whereas the fictitious $\eta_{s\bar{s}}$ meson's screening mass decreases monotonically. In temperature, the constant-field screening-mass curves for the pion and kaon cross one another, a pattern the authors read as a magnetic-field-induced reduction of the pseudocritical temperature, consistent with inverse magnetic catalysis. These results matter because screening masses probe the long-distance structure of the medium near the QCD transition, giving a handle on chiral symmetry restoration that complements the short-distance chiral condensate.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the screening mass itself: the decay rate of the spatial meson correlation function at large separation, which sets the length scale over which a mesonic disturbance propagates in the hot, magnetized medium. On the lattice, the masses are extracted by fitting folded correlators to multi-state sums of non-oscillating and oscillating hyperbolic cosines, with the number of states chosen by the corrected Akaike information criterion; the continuum value is then obtained by assuming that the remaining discretization error scales as $1/N_\tau^2$, combining a linear fit through $N_\tau = 12$ and 16 with a quadratic fit through $N_\tau = 8$, 12, and 16. Conceptually, the interpretation is carried by two competing mechanisms: inverse magnetic catalysis from sea quarks pulls the screening mass down as $eB$ grows, while magnetic catalysis from valence quarks pushes it up, and the paper reads the location of the minimum as the balance point of the two.

What would settle it

Run the same physical setup on a fourth, finer lattice — for instance $N_\tau = 20$ at the same aspect ratio 4 — and redo the continuum estimate: if the $1/N_\tau^2$ scaling is right, the new point must land within errors of both the $N_\tau = 12/16$ linear extrapolation and the $N_\tau = 8/12/16$ quadratic one. A fourth point that forces a different scaling law would move the continuum screening masses and with them the location and depth of the claimed $\pi^0$ and $K^0$ minima. A complementary check on the same ensembles is to measure the pseudocritical temperature directly from the chiral condensate and compare it with the crossing temperatures of the fixed-field screening-mass curves.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Stated as the authors would state it to a fair reader: in the continuum limit of (2+1)-flavor QCD at physical quark masses and temperatures from 145 to 166 MeV, the screening masses of the neutral pion $\pi^0$ and the neutral kaon $K^0$ are convex functions of the magnetic field. Starting from $eB = 0$ they decrease to a minimum and then increase, and the minimum moves to smaller $eB$ as the temperature rises; the fictitious strange eta $\eta_{s\bar{s}}$ instead falls monotonically with $eB$, with no minimum, a difference the authors attribute to strange valence quarks feeling mainly magnetic catalysis. In temperature, the fixed-field curves for $\pi^0$ and $K^0$ cross at low temperatures, which the paper interprets as stronger fields lowering the pseudocritical temperature and promoting earlier chiral symmetry restoration, while the $\eta_{s\bar{s}}$ curves converge without crossing. The continuum estimates rest on lattices with temporal extents $N_\tau = 8$, 12, and 16 at aspect ratio 4, using the HISQ/tree action with physical quark masses, magnetic fields up to $eB = 1$ GeV$^2$, and an extrapolation that combines linear and quadratic fits in $1/N_\tau^2$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the leftover lattice-spacing error falls as the square of the lattice spacing, so the screening masses at $N_\tau = 8$, 12, and 16 lie on a single smooth curve in $1/N_\tau^2$; the straight-line fit through the two coarser points and the curved fit through all three have no spare points to verify that scaling, and if taste-breaking or other discretization effects are not purely quadratic in the spacing, the continuum masses and the magnetic-field minima would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the dip-then-rise is real, the light-meson channel's screening length in the plasma first lengthens and then shortens as the magnetic field grows, meaning the range of mesonic correlations is itself non-monotonic in $eB$ near the crossover.
The crossing of the fixed-field $\pi^0$ and $K^0$ screening-mass curves implies that a stronger magnetic field brings the medium closer to chiral restoration at the same temperature, i.e. that the pseudocritical temperature decreases with $eB$.
The monotonic decline of the $\eta_{s\bar{s}}$ screening mass implies that the strange-quark sector responds to the magnetic field mainly through magnetic catalysis in the investigated window, in contrast to the light-quark sector.
Because the minimum shifts to smaller $eB$ as temperature increases, the non-monotonicity is tied to proximity to the crossover and should be most visible just below the pseudocritical temperature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct test of the balance-point reading would compute the $\pi^0$ pseudoscalar susceptibility on the same ensembles: the Ward-Takahashi identity ties it to the chiral condensate, so the field strength at which the screening mass bottoms out should coincide with where the condensate's drop is steepest.
Because the magnetic field couples directly to charged states, computing the charged-pion screening mass alongside the neutral one would separate valence- and sea-quark effects more cleanly than neutral channels alone; this paper computes only neutral mesons.
Finer $eB$ spacing near zero and additional temperatures flanking the five used here would test whether the initial downward slope from the origin and the crossing temperatures both survive, or whether the B-spline interpolation is smoothing a sharper structure.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a LATTICE2024 proceedings that summarizes the same group's companion paper [11]. The new content is modest: physical quark masses and a continuum estimate for pi0, K0, and eta_s sbar screening masses in magnetic fields, extending their earlier heavier-quark study [5]. The paper says so itself, so I don't hold the lack of novelty against it as a proceedings, but it does mean the standalone value is mainly as a pointer to [11].

What the paper does well: the lattice setup is standard HISQ/tree with physical pion and kaon masses, multiple Ntau, and a careful AICc-based model selection for the correlator fits with bootstrap uncertainties. The qualitative picture — pi0 and K0 screening masses dipping then rising with eB, eta_s decreasing monotonically, and crossing of constant-eB curves in T — is plausible and consistent with the group's earlier work at heavier quark masses. The neglect of disconnected diagrams is stated explicitly and attributed to earlier estimates, which is fine for a proceedings.

The soft spots are in the continuum extrapolation, and they are real but not disqualifying for a proceedings. The linear ansatz uses only Ntau=12 and 16, and the quadratic uses Ntau=8, 12, and 16; neither has residual degrees of freedom, so the O(a^2) scaling is assumed rather than tested. Taste violations or O(a^2 alpha_s) terms could shift the minima in Fig. 4 and the crossings in Fig. 5. The extrapolation is applied to a B-spline interpolation in (T,eB), which can smooth features, and no raw screening masses or fit parameters are given, so the continuum bands cannot be independently audited from this text. Those are real limitations, but the paper is honest about being directly based on [11], so the full systematic checks presumably live there.

Who gets value from this: people working on heavy-ion phenomenology or effective models who want a quick summary of where the lattice numbers point, and lattice practitioners who want to see the group's latest analysis choices. It deserves a serious referee because the physics question is important and the simulation work is careful, even though the conclusions are preliminary. My recommendation: accept as a proceedings contribution, but make the authors state explicitly in the text that the continuum estimates are based on zero-degree-of-freedom fits and that the companion paper is the definitive reference. Strictly on its own merits, I would not cite this proceedings; I would cite [11] instead.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This proceedings paper reports a lattice QCD study of the screening masses of neutral pseudoscalar mesons (π0, K0, and the fictitious η_sbar) in (2+1)-flavor HISQ/tree QCD at physical quark masses, for temperatures between 145 and 166 MeV and magnetic fields up to eB = 1 GeV^2. The screening masses are extracted from spatial correlators using multi-state fits with AICc model selection, interpolated in the (T, eB) plane via B-splines, and extrapolated to the continuum using linear (Nτ = 12, 16) and quadratic (Nτ = 8, 12, 16) fits in 1/Nτ^2. The central claims are that the continuum-estimated π0 and K0 screening masses are non-monotonic in eB with minima that shift to smaller eB as T increases, that the η_sbar screening mass decreases monotonically with eB, and that constant-eB curves in T cross, which is interpreted as evidence for a reduction of T_pc with magnetic field.

Significance. If substantiated, these results would provide continuum-estimated, physical-quark-mass evidence for inverse magnetic catalysis in the screening spectrum and would support the picture of T_pc reduction in a magnetic field. The paper uses a sensible lattice setup: a tuned HISQ/tree action, physical light and strange quark masses, AICc model selection with bootstrap errors, and three lattice spacings. The main caveats are that the continuum extrapolation relies on fits with zero residual degrees of freedom, the disconnected quark-line contributions are neglected without finite-temperature justification, and the reported AICc formula is nonstandard. Because the qualitative conclusions are statements about minima and crossings of continuum bands, these issues are directly relevant to the paper's central claims.

major comments (3)

[§4.3, Eqs. (9)-(10)] The continuum extrapolation has zero residual degrees of freedom: the linear ansatz uses only Nτ = 12 and 16 (two data points, two parameters) and the quadratic ansatz uses Nτ = 8, 12, and 16 (three data points, three parameters). Neither fit can test the assumed O(a^2) scaling. Since the minima in Fig. 4 and the crossings in Fig. 5 are features of the continuum bands constructed from these fits, an unquantified taste-violating or O(a^2 α_s) term could shift these features. In addition, the fits are applied to B-spline interpolated values rather than to independent raw lattice points, and the smoothing factor used at Nτ = 8 can feed into the continuum estimate in a way that is not tested. Please provide per-Nτ screening masses (or a table of fit parameters), a scaling plot, and/or an estimate of the systematic error from the extrapolation ansatz. If these checks are documented in companion Ref. [11], please state explicitly which results are taken from there rather than derived in this proceedings text.
[§4.1, Eq. (8)] The reported AICc formula is not the standard one: AICc = 2k - ln(hat L) + (2k^2 + 2k)/(n - k - 1) should contain -2 ln(hat L) rather than -ln(hat L). As written, the criterion changes the relative weight of goodness-of-fit and model complexity, which can alter the selected ansatz and hence the extracted screening masses. Please correct Eq. (8) and confirm that the quoted masses are unchanged under the standard definition of AICc.
[§3.3] The neglect of disconnected quark-line contributions is justified by citing Ref. [7], a zero-temperature study. For the neutral π0 and η_sbar channels near T_pc, the disconnected part is expected to be more prominent, and the paper itself attributes the observed behavior to sea-quark effects (inverse magnetic catalysis). Without a finite-temperature estimate of the disconnected contribution, the quoted screening masses may not represent the full physical meson screening masses. Please quantify this systematic or cite a finite-temperature study that supports the claim that the disconnected part is small.

minor comments (6)

[§5.2] The text says 'The constant temperature curves diverge at higher temperature', but Fig. 5 shows screening mass versus T at fixed eB; this should read 'constant magnetic field curves'.
[§4.1] There is a typo in 'to decrease reduce the fitting error': it should be 'to reduce'.
[§5, first paragraphs] The text contains 'InfigureFigure4' and 'FigureFigure5'; these should be 'In Fig. 4' and 'Fig. 5'.
[Abstract] The phrase 'The simulated temperatures ranges from 145 MeV to 166 MeV' should be 'The simulated temperatures range from ...' or 'The temperature ranges from ...'.
[§2.1 and figure captions] The notation for the fictitious eta meson is inconsistent: it appears as η^0_{s\bar s} in Eq. (3) but as η^0_{\bar s s} or η^0_{\bar{ss}} in figure captions and text; please unify the notation.
[References] Reference [11] is a preprint (arXiv:2501.11262); if it has been published or accepted, please update the citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction found: screening masses are measured from lattice correlators rather than constructed from the claims they support.

full rationale

The paper's central observable, the pseudoscalar screening mass, is extracted by fitting the spatial correlator in Eq. (7) to a multi-exponential cosh ansatz, with model selection by AICc and plateau identification described in Sec. 4.1. These are direct lattice measurements, not quantities defined in terms of the conclusions. The continuum estimates in Eqs. (9)-(10) are obtained by extrapolating the three available lattice spacings under an assumed O(a^2) scaling; the linear fit uses only Ntau=12 and 16 and the quadratic fit uses Ntau=8, 12 and 16, so neither ansatz has residual degrees of freedom to validate the scaling law. This is a genuine correctness caveat about under-validated extrapolation, not circularity: the continuum result is not identical by construction to any fitted input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The Ward-Takahashi identities in Eqs. (1)-(3) are presented as theoretical context and are not used to generate the screening-mass results. The paper does rely on same-author prior works: Ref. [5] for the qualitative interpretation, Ref. [7] for the expected smallness of disconnected contributions, and Ref. [11], with the statement 'This proceeding is directly based on the work presented in Ref. [11],' for the companion full analysis. These are self-referential context and a reproducibility limitation in this proceedings write-up, but they do not constitute a logical circle in the derivation presented here: the lattice correlator fits, interpolations, and continuum estimates are described and displayed from the data. Since no circular step can be exhibited as a reduction of a result to its own input, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The eta_s sbar meson is a standard quark-model interpolating operator used for tuning and analysis, not a new postulated entity. The central result rests on standard lattice QCD assumptions plus the specific continuum extrapolation and disconnected-diagram approximations noted above.

free parameters (2)

Continuum fit constants b, c, d = not tabulated
Eqs. (9)-(10) fit the lattice screening masses at N_tau=8,12,16 by a linear or quadratic polynomial in 1/N_tau^2; the slopes are determined by the data and enter the reported continuum estimates.
B-spline smoothing factor = not stated
The 2D interpolation in the T-eB plane (bisplrep) applies a smoothing factor whose value is not given; the continuum estimate is built from the interpolated lattice data.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Lattice QCD with the HISQ/tree action and staggered fermions reproduces continuum QCD as a->0, with O(a^2) scaling.
Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 4.3 assume the observable follows O(T,B,N_tau)=O_cont + b/N_tau^2 + d/N_tau^4; no correction terms or taste-symmetry violations are included.
domain assumption Disconnected quark-line contributions to the neutral pseudoscalar screening correlators are negligibly small.
Sec. 3.3 states the disconnected contributions are neglected because their impact is expected to be small, citing Ref [7] by the same group; no estimate of the resulting systematic error is given.
domain assumption The AICc-selected few-state ansatz in Eq. (7) correctly captures the long-distance screening correlator, so the extracted mass is the true screening mass.
Sec. 4.1 uses fits with up to three non-oscillating and oscillating states over a selected plateau; the model selection is data-driven but the systematic from truncating states is not quantified.
domain assumption The magnetic field quantization relation eB = 6 pi N_b/(N_sigma^2 a^2) and the tree-level scale setting via f_K are sufficient; no B-dependent renormalization is applied.
Sec. 3.2 introduces the quantized flux and Sec. 3.1 sets the scale with f_K at zero field; the paper does not discuss renormalization of the magnetic field or a B-dependent scale.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pseudoscalar Screening Mass at Finite Temperature and Magnetic Field from Lattice QCD with Physical Quark Masses." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RNITKNVX

@misc{pith2026250206216,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pseudoscalar Screening Mass at Finite Temperature and Magnetic Field from Lattice QCD with Physical Quark Masses},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RNITKNVX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06216}
}

abstract

Understanding the screening mass of pseudoscalar mesons at finite temperature and magnetic field is crucial for comprehending the behavior of strongly interacting matter under extreme conditions, such as those found in the early universe or inside neutron stars. Additionally, in heavy ion collisions, strong magnetic fields are generated, which could significantly influence the properties of the quark-gluon plasma. The study of these screening masses provides insight into the modifications of mesonic properties in such environments, which is essential for the theoretical understanding of Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) phase transitions and the properties of the quark-gluon plasma. Here, we present continuum estimated lattice QCD results on the screening mass of neutral pseudoscalar mesons at finite temperatures and nonzero magnetic fields. The simulations used (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD simulations using physical quark masses employing the HISQ/tree action. The continuum estimation was carried out using lattices having temporal extents $N_\tau$ = 8, 12, and 16, all having aspect ratio $N_\sigma/N_\tau$ = 4. The investigated temperature ranges from 145 MeV to 166 MeV, while the magnetic field strength varies from 0 to 1 GeV$^2$. We discuss the dependence of the screening masses of various neutral pseudoscalar mesons on temperature, magnetic field strength, and quark mass.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06216 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Sample screening correlators (left), AICc selection (middle) and screening mass plateau (right) at 𝑇 = 156.924 MeV on a lattice with size 643 × 16 for 𝜋 0 . The correlator is shown for four values of magnetic flux 𝑁𝑏 while the AICc selection and plateau is shown for 𝑁𝑏 = 6. To extract the screening masses, we fit the correlators using a range of ansatz configurations that account for both non-oscillating and oscilla… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Samples of interpolation estimate of the screening mass as a function of the magnetic field 𝑒𝐵 at fixed temperatures are shown for three quark-lattice dimension combinations: 323 × 8 for 𝜋 0 (left), 483 × 12 for 𝐾 0 (middle), 643 × 16 for 𝜂 0 𝑠𝑠¯ (right). The data points are the lattice data and the band depicts the interpolated values in 𝑇 − 𝑒𝐵 plane. The upper x-axis is rescaled by the pion mass square in the vacu… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Samples of continuum estimation of the screening mass at fixed temperatures 𝑇 and magnetic field 𝑒𝐵 are shown for three temperatures and quark combination: 𝜋 0 at T=145.0 MeV (left), 𝐾 0 at T=157.0 MeV (middle), and 𝜂 0 𝑠𝑠¯ at T=166.0 MeV (right). The data points are obtained through interpolation of the lattice data and the band depicts the error obtained using the RMS of linear and quadratic ansatz. neutral kaon 𝐾… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The continuum estimates of the screening mass for neutral pseudoscalar mesons, namely 𝜋 0 (left), 𝐾 0 (middle), 𝜂 0 𝑠𝑠¯ (right) as a function of magnetic field strength 𝑒𝐵 at a fixed temperature 𝑇. The shaded bands represent the continuum estimated results, while the d…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The continuum estimates of the screening mass for neutral pseudoscalar mesons, namely 𝜋 0 (top), 𝐾 0 (middle), 𝜂 0 𝑠𝑠¯ (bottom) as a function of temperature T at fixed magnetic field eB. The band depicts the continuum estimates. curves diverge at higher temperature, wh…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

11 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[11]

Ding, J.-B

H.-T. Ding, J.-B. Gu, S.-T. Li and R. Thakkar,Chiral condensates and screening masses of neutral pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD at physical quark masses, 2501.11262. 9

arXiv
[5]

H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, J. H. Liu and X. D. Wang,Chiral condensates and screening masses of neutral pseudoscalar mesons in thermomagnetic QCD medium, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), 034514 [2201.02349]

arXiv 2022
[7]

H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, A. Tomiya, X. D. Wang and Y. Zhang,Chiral properties of (2+1)- flavor QCD in strong magnetic fields at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) , 014505 [2008.00493]

arXiv 2021
[1]

G.Endrodi, QCDwithbackgroundelectromagneticfieldsonthelattice: Areview ,Prog.Part. Nucl. Phys.141 (2025), 104153 [2406.19780]

arXiv 2025
[2]

G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schafer and K. K. Szabo,The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields, JHEP 02 (2012), 044 [1111.4956]

arXiv 2012
[3]

G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz and A. Schafer,QCD quark condensate in external magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D86(2012), 071502 [1206.4205]

arXiv 2012
[4]

871(2013),13[1207.5081]

I.A.Shovkovy, MagneticCatalysis: AReview ,Lect.NotesPhys. 871(2013),13[1207.5081]

arXiv 2013
[6]

Bazavov, S

A. Bazavov, S. Dentinger, H. T. Ding, P. Hegde, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, A. Lahiri, S. Mukherjee and H. Ohno,et al. Meson screening masses in (2+1)-flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) , 094510 [1908.09552]

arXiv 2019

Show all 11 references

[8]

D’Elia, S

M. D’Elia, S. Mukherjee and F. Sanfilippo,QCD Phase Transition in a Strong Magnetic Background, Phys. Rev. D82(2010), 051501 [1005.5365]

2010 arXiv
[9]

Mazur et al

L. Mazur et al. [HotQCD], SIMULATeQCD: A simple multi-GPU lattice code for QCD calculations,Comput. Phys. Commun.300 (2024), 109164 [2306.01098]

2024 arXiv
[10]

R.Gupta,G.Guralnik,G.W.KilcupandS.R.Sharpe, TheQuenchedspectrumwithstaggered fermions,Phys. Rev. D43 (1991), 2003

1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [11]

Ding, J.-B

H.-T. Ding, J.-B. Gu, S.-T. Li and R. Thakkar,Chiral condensates and screening masses of neutral pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD at physical quark masses, 2501.11262. 9

arXiv

[2] [5]

H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, J. H. Liu and X. D. Wang,Chiral condensates and screening masses of neutral pseudoscalar mesons in thermomagnetic QCD medium, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022), 034514 [2201.02349]

arXiv 2022

[3] [7]

H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, A. Tomiya, X. D. Wang and Y. Zhang,Chiral properties of (2+1)- flavor QCD in strong magnetic fields at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) , 014505 [2008.00493]

arXiv 2021

[4] [1]

G.Endrodi, QCDwithbackgroundelectromagneticfieldsonthelattice: Areview ,Prog.Part. Nucl. Phys.141 (2025), 104153 [2406.19780]

arXiv 2025

[5] [2]

G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schafer and K. K. Szabo,The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields, JHEP 02 (2012), 044 [1111.4956]

arXiv 2012

[6] [3]

G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz and A. Schafer,QCD quark condensate in external magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D86(2012), 071502 [1206.4205]

arXiv 2012

[7] [4]

871(2013),13[1207.5081]

I.A.Shovkovy, MagneticCatalysis: AReview ,Lect.NotesPhys. 871(2013),13[1207.5081]

arXiv 2013

[8] [6]

Bazavov, S

A. Bazavov, S. Dentinger, H. T. Ding, P. Hegde, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, E. Laermann, A. Lahiri, S. Mukherjee and H. Ohno,et al. Meson screening masses in (2+1)-flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) , 094510 [1908.09552]

arXiv 2019