Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Falsification of Unconfoundedness by Testing Independence of Causal Mechanisms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.06231 v2 pith:YQDKWCIQ submitted 2025-02-10 stat.ME cs.LGstat.ML

classification stat.MEcs.LGstat.ML
keywords confoundingdatafalsificationunmeasuredalgorithmassumptioncausalmechanisms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A major challenge in estimating treatment effects in observational studies is the reliance on untestable conditions such as the assumption of no unmeasured confounding. In this work, we propose an algorithm that can falsify the assumption of no unmeasured confounding in a setting with observational data from multiple heterogeneous sources, which we refer to as environments. Our proposed falsification strategy leverages a key observation that unmeasured confounding can cause observed causal mechanisms to appear dependent. Building on this observation, we develop a novel two-stage procedure that detects these dependencies with high statistical power while controlling false positives. The algorithm does not require access to randomized data and, in contrast to other falsification approaches, functions even under transportability violations when the environment has a direct effect on the outcome of interest. To showcase the practical relevance of our approach, we show that our method is able to efficiently detect confounding on both simulated and semi-synthetic data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncovering Bias Mechanisms in Observational Studies

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Covariances between the size of causal bias and conditional variances of treatment, selection, and outcome form a fingerprint that distinguishes transportability, confounding, and selection bias mechanisms.

Pith tools