Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 30 references

Silica Aerogel Thin Film on Improving Solar Cell Efficiency

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A silica aerogel thin film on a monocrystalline silicon solar cell increases the cell's output voltage and photoelectric conversion efficiency compared with an untreated cell.

desk verdict A detailed, honestly reported aerogel synthesis and characterization study whose central solar-cell efficiency claim is not supported by the measurement setup. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06375 v1 pith:IE6QYPTN submitted 2025-02-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.softphysics.app-ph

Yan Che This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.softphysics.app-ph
keywords silicaaerogelthinfilmmonocrystallinesiliconsolarcellambientpressuredryingsurfacederivatizationantireflectivecoatingsol-gelsynthesisphotoelectricconversionefficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to establish that a thin silica aerogel film can act as an antireflective, light-trapping coating on a monocrystalline silicon solar cell, raising the cell's output voltage and photoelectric conversion efficiency without modifying the semiconductor itself. The study synthesizes hydrophobic silica aerogel films at ambient pressure using a two-step acid/base-catalyzed sol-gel process and trimethylchlorosilane surface derivatization, then characterizes their pore structure, roughness, and refractive index. In solar-cell tests, a 0.2 mm film increased open-circuit voltage and output power relative to an untreated cell, while thicker films reduced output; IV measurements were interpreted as showing improved charge transport in the treated cell. If the claim holds, it points to a low-cost, scalable add-on route to better silicon photovoltaics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the silica aerogel thin film itself: a nanoporous SiO$_2$ network made by a two-step acid/base-catalyzed sol-gel process, with surface silanol groups replaced by hydrophobic –O–Si(CH$_3$)$_3$ groups via trimethylchlorosilane, then dried at ambient pressure. Its refractive index is computed from density using the Clausius–Mossotti / Lorentz–Lorenz relation as $n = 1 + 0.19\rho = 1.05$. The porosity, mercury-intrusion tortuosity, and AFM-measured surface roughness are invoked to explain reduced reflection and increased scattering and path length; aging in ethanol is what keeps the film crack-free. This film is the mechanism that allegedly converts more incident light into photocurrent.

What would settle it

Prepare fresh coated and uncoated cells from the same silicon panel and measure them under a calibrated AM 1.5G solar simulator with a reference-cell spectral correction. If the 0.2 mm aerogel-coated cell does not show higher short-circuit current and efficiency than the bare cell under that standard spectrum, the claimed enhancement is not a real photovoltaic improvement.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a silica aerogel thin film synthesized under ambient conditions and applied to a monocrystalline silicon solar cell serves as an effective antireflective and light-trapping layer, increasing the cell's output voltage and photoelectric conversion efficiency compared with an untreated cell. The film's low refractive index (1.05), high porosity (77.92%), and rough, textured surface (55–78% roughness) are presented as the physical reasons: they reduce surface reflection and lengthen the optical path for incoming photons. Supporting measurements show the 0.2 mm treated cell with open-circuit voltages around 463–468 mV versus roughly 450–457 mV for the untreated cell, and higher output power at several load resistances; IV characterization shows the treated cell's curve shifted in a way the paper interprets as photovoltage opposing the applied bias, indicating better charge transport. Thicker 0.4 mm and 0.8 mm films reduce output, so the claim is specifically that an optimized thin aerogel coating improves performance.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 27 W Philips lamp placed 20 cm above the solar cell produces light close enough to standard AM 1.5 sunlight for the measured voltage and efficiency differences to represent real-world photovoltaic performance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 0.2 mm aerogel film outperforms both no film and thicker films, so coating thickness is a primary optimization lever for efficiency gains.
  • The improvement is optical, not electronic: the low-index porous layer reduces reflection and lengthens the photon path, so it can be added to cells without redesigning the silicon junction.
  • Ambient-pressure synthesis with surface derivatization avoids supercritical drying, which makes the antireflective coating route cheaper and easier to scale than conventional aerogel processing.
  • Because the film is hydrophobic, the coating could provide water repellency as well as antireflection, a practical benefit for outdoor panels.
  • Further tuning of thickness and morphology is expected to produce larger gains than the 0.2 mm film already shows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the test light source is a 27 W household lamp rather than a calibrated AM1.5 simulator, the measured voltage and power gains should be verified under a standard solar spectrum before extrapolating to real panels.
  • Editorial inference: the proposed optical mechanism predicts a measurable reduction in total reflectance and an increase in external quantum efficiency across the silicon response band; both are directly testable on the same films.
  • Editorial inference: if the gain is purely optical, the same aerogel film should transfer to multicrystalline, heterojunction, or thin-film silicon cells, and could be combined with rear reflectors or pyramidal texturing rather than substituting for them.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports ambient-pressure synthesis of hydrophobic silica aerogel thin films via a two-step acid/base-catalyzed sol-gel process with trimethylchlorosilane derivatization, followed by structural and optical characterization (FTIR, SEM, AFM, MIP, BET). The films are then applied to monocrystalline silicon solar cells, and the authors claim that a 0.2 mm aerogel coating increases output voltage and photoelectric conversion efficiency compared with an untreated cell, based on preliminary voltage measurements under a 27 W lamp and on IV curves obtained with a Keithley 2400 SMU.

Significance. If validated, the approach could offer a low-cost antireflective coating for silicon photovoltaics. The synthesis and structural characterization are reasonably detailed, and the paper reports multiple trials for the preliminary measurements. However, the central efficiency claim rests on nonstandard solar-cell testing that does not establish photovoltaic conversion efficiency, so the significance of the main claim is currently unsubstantiated.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.3 and Table 2] The illumination source is a Philips 66027 27 W lamp placed 20 cm above the panel, described as conforming to AM1.5 standards. No spectrum, irradiance, or calibration against a standard solar simulator is reported. A household lamp does not reproduce the AM1.5G spectrum or intensity, so the output voltages and powers in Table 2 cannot be used to infer efficiency under standard sunlight. The statement that the aerogel 'appear[s] to improve photon absorption' is therefore not supported by the data.
  2. [Section 3.2 and Fig. 7] The IV curves in Fig. 7 are not standard solar-cell I-V curves. The measurement uses a Keithley 2400 as a DC supply and a nanovoltmeter, and the curves resemble the breakdown characteristics described in Fig. 6 for a dark environment. No short-circuit current, open-circuit voltage, fill factor, or conversion efficiency is extracted from the curves; the interpretation of a 'leftward deviation' as evidence of an intrinsic photovoltage is not a recognized photovoltaic analysis. Consequently, the abstract's claim of 'enhanced charge transport and conversion efficiency' is not demonstrated by the presented data.
  3. [Section 2.3 and Section 3.2] The treated and untreated cells are separate 3 mm × 5 mm fragments excised from different panels, and no statistics or cell-to-cell variation are reported. The comparison in Fig. 7 is between distinct devices, so any difference could be due to fabrication inhomogeneity rather than the aerogel coating. The paper does not provide repeated IV measurements on multiple samples of each type, so the observed differences cannot be attributed to the film.
  4. [Supplementary 'Solar cell data measurement set up' and Table 2] The preliminary measurements select a load resistor equal to the cell's internal resistance using the maximum power transfer theorem, treating the solar cell as a voltage source. This is not a valid approach for a photovoltaic device, which operates as a current source; the load resistance at the maximum power point is not equal to the internal resistance, and the computed powers in Table 2 do not correspond to maximum power or conversion efficiency. This undermines the quantitative claims based on Table 2.
  5. [Section 2.3 and Fig. 6] The paper describes an avalanche breakdown event that destroyed a sample, and Fig. 6 presents an IV curve in a dark environment showing breakdown. It is not clear whether the IV curves in Fig. 7 were obtained under conditions that avoid breakdown or whether the two-terminal configuration and voltage range used are appropriate for photovoltaic characterization. The voltage range, sweep direction, and constancy of illumination during the IV sweeps are not specified, so the curves cannot be interpreted as standard PV curves.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3.1] The abstract reports a specific surface area of 115 m2/g, but Fig. 5c gives a BET surface area of (0.0637 ± 0.0404) m2/g; the paper acknowledges the discrepancy but does not qualify the abstract value as being from mercury intrusion porosimetry rather than BET.
  2. [Table 2 caption] The caption states that the film thickness is calculated by dividing the volume of the bulk aerogel by the area of the silicon panel; this is not a direct measurement of the film thickness on the cell, so the quoted '0.2 mm' value should be interpreted with caution.
  3. [Section 3.2] The statement that the peak output power occurred at a 4 Ω resistor and that this indicates an internal resistance of about 4 Ω is inconsistent with the 7 MΩ and 16 Ω values reported in Section 2.3 for the same cell types.
  4. [General] The active area of the 3 mm × 5 mm fragments is not defined in the efficiency discussion, and the illumination intensity is not reported, so the measured powers are not normalized to a standard condition.
  5. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical and formatting issues, such as 'e fficiency' in place of 'efficiency' and 'A verage' in Table 1; a thorough proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the efficiency claim is a direct empirical measurement, not a prediction derived from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is empirical rather than deductive. The refractive index n = 1 + 0.19ρ is a standard Clausius-Mossotti/Lorentz-Lorenz relation applied to the independently measured aerogel density; it does not presuppose any solar-cell outcome. The claimed efficiency gain is inferred directly from the measured output voltages in Table 2 and from the I-V traces in Fig. 7, so the conclusion is an interpretation of reported measurements, not a prediction generated by a fitted model. No parameter is fitted to the solar-cell data and then renamed as a prediction; no load-bearing argument depends on a citation by the same author; and no known result is merely renamed. The serious experimental weaknesses—uncalibrated 27 W lamp, no standard Jsc/Voc/FF/efficiency extraction, two-terminal measurement, and comparison of separate physical devices—bear on whether the empirical claim is true, not on whether the reasoning is circular. Under the required standard, no circular step can be quoted and explicitly reduced to its own inputs, so the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a few assumptions: the refractive index computed from density via an empirical relation, the representativeness of MIP density for the thin film, the equivalence of the household lamp to AM1.5, and the attribution of measured voltage changes to the aerogel's optical effects. No new entities are introduced, and no parameters are fitted to the efficiency data.

free parameters (1)
  • empirical refractive index coefficient = 0.19 (from literature)
    Used in n = 1 + 0.19ρ to compute n=1.05; not derived or measured in this paper.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Lorentz-Lorenz relation n = 1 + 0.19ρ is valid for the synthesized aerogel.
    The refractive index is not measured directly; it is computed from density using an empirical relation from prior sol-gel literature (Budunoglu et al. 2011). If the film's structure deviates, the low n=1.05 may be inaccurate.
  • domain assumption The MIP-measured bulk density (0.2752 g/mL) represents the thin film on the solar cell.
    The film was brushed onto the cell, and no thickness or density was measured on the actual coated solar cell; the bulk sample may differ.
  • ad hoc to paper The 27 W lamp at 20 cm approximates AM1.5 solar illumination.
    Section 2.3 claims AM1.5 standards, but the lamp is not a solar simulator and no irradiance calibration is given.
  • domain assumption Observed voltage/power differences are caused by the aerogel's optical effects rather than experimental variability.
    No error analysis or control for contact effects, film non-uniformity, or diode breakdown is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Silica Aerogel Thin Film on Improving Solar Cell Efficiency." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IE6QYPTN

@misc{pith2026250206375,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Silica Aerogel Thin Film on Improving Solar Cell Efficiency},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IE6QYPTN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06375}
}
read the original abstract

Silica aerogels are nanoporous materials with exceptional optical and physical properties, making them promising candidates to enhance solar cell efficiency as antireflective coatings. This study synthesized hydrophobic silica aerogel thin films under ambient conditions and characterized their porous structure, surface morphology, and optical performance. The films were deposited on monocrystalline silicon solar cells to assess their impact on photovoltaic properties. A two-step acid/base catalyzed sol-gel process was utilized, followed by solvent exchange and surface modification with trimethylchlorosilane. Structural analysis via SEM revealed successful deposition of crack-free films when aging occurred in an ethanol environment. The aerogel displayed considerable specific surface area (115 m2/g), porosity (77.92%), and surface roughness (55-78%) along with a low refractive index (1.05), benefiting light harvesting. Preliminary solar testing showed increased output voltage with a 0.2 mm aerogel coating versus a bare cell. Further IV measurements demonstrated enhanced charge transport and conversion efficiency for the treated cell. The antireflective and light-trapping effects of aerogel appear to improve photon absorption. This initial research validates the potential of ambient pressure-synthesized hydrophobic silica aerogels to increase the performance of silicon photovoltaics cost-effectively. Further optimization of film thickness and morphology could realize higher efficiency gains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06375 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FTIR spectrum of silica thin film. silica network (Budunoglu et al., 2011; Yang et al., 1997; Zhang et al., 2001). Additional peaks at 1701 cm−1 , 1628 cm−1 , and 1240 cm−1 could be attributed to various functional groups in￾troduced or modified during the derivatization process, possibly including carbonyl or ether functionalities (Nandiyanto et al., 2019). The lower wavenumber peaks, such as those at 555 cm−1 and … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. AFM height scan of aerogel thin film. (a) and (b) depict the 2D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Mercury intrusion curves for silica aerogel thin film. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: BET data of silica aerogel thin film.. negative C constant, may suggest non-ideal adsorption behavior or a lack of monolayer formation. The correlation coefficient of 0.638 further points to a moderate fit to the BET model, which, combined with the sharp increase in 1/…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Electrical transportation measurement of solar cell in dark environment: (a) IV curve with voltage running from 0-100mV; (b) IR curve of the same set up [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: IV curves of solar cell: (a) As-prepared solar cell tested in a dark environment; (b) As-prepared solar cell tested in a lighting environment; (c) Treated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

  2. [2]

    , author Newby, P

    author Acquaroli, L.N. , author Newby, P. , author Santato, C. , author Peter, Y.A. , year 2016 . title Thermal properties of methyltrimethoxysilane aerogel thin films . journal AIP Advances volume 6 . :10.1063/1.4965921

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4965921 2016

  3. [3]

    , author Caps, R

    author Beck, A. , author Caps, R. , author Fricke, J. , year 1989 . title Scattering of visible light from silica aerogels . journal Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics volume 22 , pages 730--734 . :10.1088/0022-3727/22/6/002

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/22/6/002 1989

  4. [4]

    , author Prakash, S.S

    author Brinker, C.J. , author Prakash, S.S. , year 1999 . title Ambient pressure process for preparing aerogel thin films reliquified sols useful in preparing aerogel thin films . note US Patent 5,948,482

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    , author Yildirim, A

    author Budunoglu, H. , author Yildirim, A. , author Guler, M.O. , author Bayindir, M. , year 2011 . title Highly transparent, flexible, and thermally stable superhydrophobic ORMOSIL aerogel thin films . journal ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces volume 3 , pages 539--545 . :10.1021/am101116b

    work page doi:10.1021/am101116b 2011

  6. [6]

    , author Abbasi, M.H

    author Dorcheh, A.S. , author Abbasi, M.H. , year 2008 . title Silica aerogel; synthesis, properties and characterization . journal Journal of Materials Processing Technology volume 199 , pages 10--26 . :10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.060

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.060 2008

  7. [7]

    , author Emmerling, A

    author Fricke, J. , author Emmerling, A. , year 1992 . title Aerogels preparation, properties, applications , in: booktitle Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Applications of Sol-Gel Glasses . publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg , pp. pages 37--87 . :10.1007/bfb0036965

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0036965 1992

  8. [8]

    , author Gahramanli, Y

    author Goryunova, K. , author Gahramanli, Y. , author Gurbanova, R. , year 2023 . title Adsorption properties of silica aerogel-based materials . journal RSC Advances volume 13 , pages 18207--18216 . :10.1039/d3ra02462h

    work page doi:10.1039/d3ra02462h 2023

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    , author Jung, I.K

    author Gurav, J.L. , author Jung, I.K. , author Park, H.H. , author Kang, E.S. , author Nadargi, D.Y. , year 2010 . title Silica aerogel: synthesis and applications . journal Journal of Nanomaterials volume 2010 , pages 1--11 . :10.1155/2010/409310

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    , author Svensson, L

    author Henning, S. , author Svensson, L. , year 1981 . title Production of silica aerogel . journal Physica Scripta volume 23 , pages 697--702 . :10.1088/0031-8949/23/4b/018

    1981 doi

  3. [11]

    , year 1993

    author Hotaling, S.P. , year 1993 . title Ultra-low density aerogel optical applications . journal Journal of Materials Research volume 8 , pages 352--355 . :10.1557/jmr.1993.0352

    1993

  4. [12]

    , author Pekala, R.W

    author Hrubesh, L.W. , author Pekala, R.W. , year 1994 . title Dielectric properties and electronic applications of aerogels , in: booktitle Sol-Gel Processing and Applications . publisher Springer US , pp. pages 363--367 . :10.1007/978-1-4615-2570-7_31

    1994 doi

  5. [13]

    , author Poco, J.F

    author Hrubesh, L.W. , author Poco, J.F. , year 1995 . title Thin aerogel films for optical, thermal, acoustic and electronic applications . journal Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids volume 188 , pages 46--53 . :10.1016/0022-3093(95)00028-3

    1995 doi

  6. [14]

    , author Fukumoto, Y

    author Kawakami, N. , author Fukumoto, Y. , author Kinoshita, T. , author Suzuki, K. , author Inoue, K.i. , year 2000 . title Preparation of highly porous silica aerogel thin film by supercritical drying . journal Japanese Journal of Applied Physics volume 39 , pages L182 . :1...

    2000 doi

  7. [15]

    , author Hyun, S.H

    author Kim, G.S. , author Hyun, S.H. , year 2004 . title Synthesis and characterization of silica aerogel films for inter-metal dielectrics via ambient drying . journal Thin Solid Films volume 460 , pages 190--200 . :10.1016/j.tsf.2003.12.151

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    , year 1931

    author Kistler, S.S. , year 1931 . title Coherent expanded aerogels and jellies . journal Nature volume 127 , pages 741--741 . :10.1038/127741a0

    1931 doi

  9. [17]

    , author Tsoi, K

    author Kocak, D. , author Tsoi, K. , author Turkay, D. , author Koc, M. , author Donercark, E. , author Budunoglu, H. , author Yerci, S. , year 2023 . title Silica aerogel as rear reflector in silicon heterojunction solar cells for improved infrared response . journal Solar En...

    2023

  10. [18]

    , author Mah, M

    author Lin, P. , author Mah, M. , author Randi, J. , author DeFrances, S. , author Bernot, D. , author Talghader, J.J. , year 2023 . title High average power optical properties of silica aerogel thin film . journal Thin Solid Films volume 768 , pages 139722 . :10.1016/j.tsf.20...

    2023

  11. [19]

    , author Ding, W

    author Mekonnen, B.T. , author Ding, W. , author Liu, H. , author Guo, S. , author Pang, X. , author Ding, Z. , author Seid, M.H. , year 2021 . title Preparation of aerogel and its application progress in coatings: a mini overview . journal Journal of Leather Science and Engin...

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    , author Oktiani, R

    author Nandiyanto, A.B.D. , author Oktiani, R. , author Ragadhita, R. , year 2019 . title How to read and interpret FTIR spectroscope of organic material . journal Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology volume 4 , pages 97 . :10.17509/ijost.v4i1.15806

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    , author Masetti, E

    author Piegari, A. , author Masetti, E. , year 1985 . title Thin film thickness measurement: A comparison of various techniques . journal Thin Solid Films volume 124 , pages 249--257 . :10.1016/0040-6090(85)90273-1

    1985 doi

  14. [22]

    , author Rao, A.V

    author Pisal, A.A. , author Rao, A.V. , year 2016 . title Comparative studies on the physical properties of TEOS , TMOS and Na2SiO3 based silica aerogels by ambient pressure drying method . journal Journal of Porous Materials volume 23 , pages 1547--1556 . :10.1007/s10934-016-0215-y

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    , author Brinker, C.J

    author Prakash, S.S. , author Brinker, C.J. , author Hurd, A.J. , year 1995 a. title Silica aerogel films at ambient pressure . journal Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids volume 190 , pages 264--275 . :10.1016/0022-3093(95)00024-0

    1995 doi

  16. [24]

    , author Brinker, C.J

    author Prakash, S.S. , author Brinker, C.J. , author Hurd, A.J. , author Rao, S.M. , year 1995 b. title Silica aerogel films prepared at ambient pressure by using surface derivatization to induce reversible drying shrinkage . journal Nature volume 374 , pages 439--443 . :10.10...

    1995 doi

  17. [25]

    , author Hunt, A.J

    author Russo, R.E. , author Hunt, A.J. , year 1986 . title Comparison of ethyl versus methyl sol-gels for silica aerogels using polar nephelometry . journal Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids volume 86 , pages 219--230 . :10.1016/0022-3093(86)90490-4

    1986 doi

  18. [26]

    , author Choi, S.Y

    author Yang, H.S. , author Choi, S.Y. , author Hyun, S.H. , author Park, C.G. , year 1999 . title Ambient-dried SiO 2 aerogel thin films and their dielectric application . journal Thin Solid Films volume 348 , pages 69--73 . :10.1016/s0040-6090(99)00016-4

    1999 doi

  19. [27]

    , author Choi, S.Y

    author Yang, H.S. , author Choi, S.Y. , author Hyun, S.H. , author Park, H.H. , author Hong, J.K. , year 1997 . title Ambient-dried low dielectric SiO 2 aerogel thin film . journal Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids volume 221 , pages 151--156 . :10.1016/s0022-3093(97)00335-9

    1997 doi

  20. [28]

    , author Huang, M

    author Yu, X. , author Huang, M. , author Wang, X. , author Tang, G.H. , author Du, M. , year 2023 . title Plasmon silica aerogel for improving high-temperature solar thermal conversion . journal Applied Thermal Engineering volume 219 , pages 119419 . :10.1016/j.applthermaleng...

    2023

  21. [29]

    , author Wang, J

    author Zhang, Q. , author Wang, J. , author Wu, G. , author Shen, J. , author Buddhudu, S. , year 2001 . title Interference coating by hydrophobic aerogel-like SiO 2 thin films . journal Materials Chemistry and Physics volume 72 , pages 56--59 . :10.1016/s0254-0584(01)00322-4

    2001 doi

  22. [30]

    , author Bhatia, B

    author Zhao, L. , author Bhatia, B. , author Yang, S. , author Strobach, E. , author Weinstein, L.A. , author Cooper, T.A. , author Chen, G. , author Wang, E.N. , year 2019 . title Harnessing heat beyond 200 c from unconcentrated sunlight with nonevacuated transparent aerogels...

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.