AI-Driven HSI: Multimodality, Fusion, Challenges, and the Deep Learning Revolution

David S. Bhatti; Heung-No Lee; Maleeka Bakhtawar; Rahman S M Wahidur; Sumin Kim; Surin Lee; Yongtae Lee; Yougin Choi

REVIEW 5 major objections 7 minor 297 references

AI-Driven HSI: Multimodality, Fusion, Challenges, and the Deep Learning Revolution

T0 review · 5 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A tutorial-scale review claims AI-driven hyperspectral imaging now spans deep learning, multimodal fusion, and LLM-based alerts for crash detection and face anti-spoofing.

desk verdict Broad, useful entry point to HSI+DL, but the PRISMA-based comprehensiveness claim needs an audit trail and a few definitional fixes before I'd cite it. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06894 v1 pith:PGTWISQA submitted 2025-02-09 cs.CV cs.AI

David S. Bhatti , Yougin Choi , Rahman S M Wahidur , Maleeka Bakhtawar , Sumin Kim , Surin Lee , Yongtae Lee , Heung-No Lee This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CVcs.AI

keywords hyperspectralimagingdeeplearningmultimodaldatafusionlargelanguagemodelsspectralunmixingremotesensingimageclassificationHSIapplications

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) records dozens to hundreds of contiguous wavelength bands per pixel, forming a three-dimensional hypercube in which every material has a spectral fingerprint. The paper argues that HSI has outgrown its remote-sensing roots and is now best understood as AI-driven HSI: deep learning performs the heavy lifting in classification, unmixing, denoising, super-resolution, data fusion, and change detection, while multimodal fusion with LiDAR, SAR, thermal, and RGB data overcomes HSI's spatial and temporal limits. Its central new claim is that coupling hyperspectral cameras with large language models (LLMs), a direction it calls the 'high-brain LLM,' will let machines perceive beyond human vision and emit human-readable alerts for applications such as low-visibility crash detection and face anti-spoofing. The paper's contribution is a tutorial-scale map of the field aimed at both technical and non-technical readers, with market growth and industrial players included to motivate adoption. If the map is accurate, it gives a multidisciplinary reader one entry point instead of many narrow surveys.

What carries the argument

The hypercube, a three-dimensional array with two spatial dimensions and one spectral dimension, is the basic data object; each pixel's spectrum is its spectral signature. On top of that, the paper organizes the field around three mechanisms: acquisition choices (whiskbroom, pushbroom, staring, snapshot), preprocessing and unmixing (linear mixture model $P = R F + E$, least-squares inversion), and deep learning model families assigned to specific tasks. The named 'high-brain LLM' is the paper's proposed integration of a hyperspectral camera's output with an LLM so that spectral information is converted into human-language alerts and decisions.

What would settle it

Check the methodology: if the counts of searched, screened, and excluded articles and a flow diagram are absent, the comprehensiveness claim cannot be checked. Then run a 'high-brain LLM' prototype on a public face-antispoofing or foggy-road crash dataset and compare against an RGB-plus-thermal baseline; no improvement would refute the paper's headline LLM application.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a comprehensive, tutorial-format overview of AI-driven HSI is now possible and valuable: it spans the physics of the electromagnetic spectrum, acquisition methods, band selection, spectral unmixing, deep learning architectures (CNNs, autoencoders, DBNs, GANs, RNNs/LSTM/GRU, and transformers), multimodal fusion at pixel, feature, and decision levels, application domains from food quality to defense, and industry growth. It positions deep learning as the factor that turned HSI from a specialized sensing modality into a general analysis tool, and it identifies the fusion of hyperspectral cameras with LLMs as the emerging frontier. The paper further asserts that prior surveys are narrower and that this write-up is more comprehensive, well-composed, and tutorial-oriented.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the paper's unlogged literature search and selection were representative enough that the claimed 'comprehensive overview' is genuinely complete and unbiased; the paper says it followed a systematic-review guideline but does not report how many records were screened or why each was excluded.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A newcomer can move from HSI basics to advanced deep-learning models in one pass, lowering the barrier for entry into the field.
Practitioners get a model-selection map: CNNs for spatial-spectral features, autoencoders for compression and reduction, GANs for augmentation and domain adaptation, RNN/LSTM/GRU for temporal sequences, and transformers for long-range spectral-spatial attention.
Multimodal fusion, especially HSI with LiDAR, SAR, thermal, and RGB, is presented as the standard route to better classification, super-resolution, and change detection.
The 'high-brain LLM' direction implies that HSI output can be turned into actionable human-readable alerts, with crash detection and face anti-spoofing as the two named use cases.
The paper identifies open problems, including labeled-data scarcity, real-time edge processing, sensor miniaturization, fusion alignment, noise, and regulatory issues, that define where future HSI research should go.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Extension: if the 'high-brain LLM' direction is taken up, the field will need paired hyperspectral-plus-text datasets with crash scenes and spoofed faces; none is described in this review, so building one is the natural next step.
Extension: the market-growth numbers come from a single commercial forecast, so triangulating with public procurement records, satellite launch manifests, and sensor sales would test whether the projected compound annual growth rate is real.
Extension: the tutorial's value as a curriculum implies it will need regular updating as transformer and diffusion-based HSI methods mature; a living version with runnable code would make the survey testable.
Extension: the review's breadth invites a practical check: run one documented pipeline on a public HSI cube and report overall accuracy, average accuracy, and Kappa; that would validate the promise that readers can immediately engage with the domain.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a broad, well-illustrated tutorial survey of hyperspectral imaging and deep learning that will genuinely help a newcomer find their way into the field. But it sells itself as something it doesn't deliver: the "more comprehensive than prior surveys" claim rests on a PRISMA methodology that is described only in its broad strokes, with no search strings, record counts, screening decisions, or flow diagram. As written, that claim is unverifiable.

What's actually good: the paper assembles a lot of useful material. The tables on deep learning models (CNN, DBN, GAN, RNN/LSTM/GRU, transformers) with their HSI applications, the summary of band selection methods, the pansharpening taxonomy, the list of software tools and key players, and the market/CAGR data — these are the kind of things a newcomer would otherwise spend days digging out of scattered sources. The tutorial sections on hyperspectral cubes, signatures, acquisition methods, and the linear mixture model are clear and well pitched for a non-specialist.

Where it's soft: first, the PRISMA problem above. Second, there are a few internal inconsistencies that need ironing out. Section IV-B says "10 or more bands" makes something hyperspectral, while the introduction and Table II suggest 100+ or 10–100 bands respectively, and the ultra-hyperspectral spectral resolution threshold (Δλ/λ > 0.001) looks numerically backwards relative to the HSI value of ≈0.01. Third, the autoencoder loss function in Section V-F is garbled — the regularizer term as printed makes no sense. Fourth, the "high-brain LLM" concept is just a new name for combining HSI with vision-language models; there is no implementation or data, so it should be clearly labeled a speculative direction rather than a "key innovation" of the study. These are fixable, not fatal.

The market figures come from a single commercial source (Grand View Research). That's fine as a citation, but the paper presents them matter-of-factly; it would be better to acknowledge the source's provenance.

Who it's for: a student, a researcher from another field, or an engineer wanting a map of HSI and its AI toolbox. That audience will get value from it after the inconsistencies are corrected. It does not advance the science, but it doesn't pretend to — the problem is that the abstract and intro oversell the comprehensiveness.

My recommendation: send it to peer review, but condition acceptance on the PRISMA details being made available (or the claim being softened), the definitional inconsistencies being resolved, and the speculative LLM section being flagged as such. As a serious referee, I'd want those changes before it's citable, but the core tutorial value is real.

Referee Report

5 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper is a broad survey of AI-driven hyperspectral imaging (HSI), covering fundamentals of spectral imaging, acquisition methods, preprocessing and band selection, spectral unmixing, deep learning architectures (CNNs, autoencoders, DBNs, GANs, RNNs/LSTM/GRU, transformers), multimodal fusion, a proposed integration of HSI with large language models ("high-brain LLM"), market growth (CAGR), applications, and open research challenges. The authors claim that, based on a review of existing surveys, their write-up is more comprehensive, better composed, and more tutorial in format than prior work, and they state that the PRISMA guidelines were followed for the literature search.

Significance. If the coverage is as complete and accurate as claimed, the survey could serve as a useful entry point for researchers and practitioners, given its large reference list, numerous comparative tables, and practical information on HSI tools, datasets, and industry players. The attention to the emerging intersection of HSI with LLMs is timely and potentially useful for framing future research. However, the paper's central claim of superiority over prior surveys rests on an incompletely reported PRISMA-style methodology, and several internal technical inconsistencies undermine its tutorial reliability. The contribution is best described as a broadly scoped, generally useful survey whose main claims require strengthening and revision before the paper can be recommended for publication.

major comments (5)

[Section II / Section I] The claim in Section I that this survey is "more comprehensive, well-composed, and presented in a tutorial format" than existing surveys is anchored to the assertion in Section II that PRISMA guidelines were followed. However, the manuscript does not provide the PRISMA-mandated audit trail: no full Boolean search strings per database, no numbers of records identified, screened, or excluded with reasons, and no PRISMA flow diagram. Without these, the selection of the 500+ references cannot be distinguished from a convenience sample, and the representativeness of the survey is unverifiable. Please either supply the missing PRISMA reporting elements (search strings, record counts, screening criteria, flow diagram) or substantially soften the comprehensiveness claim.
[Section IV-B / Table II] The definition of hyperspectral imaging by number of bands is internally inconsistent. The Introduction states that "hyperspectral" was defined in 1983 as involving over 100 spectral bands, while Section IV-B states that systems with 10 or more bands are hyperspectral, and Table II lists HSI as 10-100 bands and USI as more than 1000 bands. Readers cannot tell which convention the survey adopts. Please reconcile these definitions, ideally by presenting the varying conventions explicitly and stating which one is used in the remainder of the paper.
[Section IV-B] The spectral resolution classification in Section IV-B is numerically inverted. The text says typical spectral resolution for HSI is ∆λ/λ ≈ 0.01, lower resolution classifies as multispectral (∆λ/λ ≈ 0.1), and higher resolution as ultra-hyperspectral (∆λ/λ > 0.001). Since a smaller ∆λ/λ corresponds to finer spectral resolution, the threshold for ultra-hyperspectral must be smaller than the HSI value, e.g., ∆λ/λ < 0.001 (or a value below 0.01). As written, the criterion places ultra-hyperspectral at a coarser resolution than HSI, which contradicts the intended ordering and confuses the tutorial presentation.
[Section IV-E2, Eq. (3)] The constrained least-squares formula in Eq. (3) appears to contain a transcription error. The standard solution for the linear equality-constrained problem is \hat F = (R^T R)^{-1} R^T P + (R^T R)^{-1} A^T (A (R^T R)^{-1} A^T)^{-1} (b - A \hat F_0). The printed formula has the second term as A (A^T (R^T R)^{-1} A)^{-1} A^T (b - AF), which has mismatched dimensions and omits the leading (R^T R)^{-1}. Since the paper aims to be a tutorial, this formula should be corrected or clearly referenced to a standard source.
[Section VI-E / Section X] The "high-brain LLM" concept is presented as a key innovation and as an emerging focus in the abstract, but the manuscript provides only a high-level block diagram (Figure 22) and a brief description, with no supporting literature, implementation details, or evaluation for the claimed applications such as low-visibility crash detection and face anti-spoofing. For a survey, it is acceptable to identify speculative future directions, but the text should frame this explicitly as a research vision rather than as an established or demonstrated capability. Please revise the wording in the abstract, Section VI-E, and the conclusion to avoid overstating what is currently a proposal.

minor comments (7)

[Index Terms] The index term "Multimoal HSI" contains a typo and should be "Multimodal HSI."
[Section III-B] The acquisition method is described as the "starring method" in the text, but the intended term is "staring method."
[Section IV-B] The visible band range is given as "VIS (400–600 nm)"; standard visible light is approximately 400–700 nm, and the range used in HSI applications should be stated consistently with a cited source.
[Section V-C] The text refers to "RMSE (Mean Squared Error)" when defining the root mean square error loss; it should be "Root Mean Squared Error."
[Table IV] In the Autoencoders row, the description "Dimensionality by compressing" is missing the word "reduction."
[Section VII] The market share percentages in Figure 20 sum to 98% (35 + 27 + 18 + 10 + 8 = 98), leaving a 2% discrepancy; please verify the source values or clarify that they are rounded.
[Table XVIII] Several entries contain formatting artifacts, such as "IRIS camera" without a product link and commas in URLs (e.g., "https://www.exosens.com/brands/telops" missing the leading space). A uniform formatting style for product names and links would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey is self-contained descriptive content, and its only self-citation is not load-bearing.

full rationale

This manuscript is a tutorial-style survey, not a derivation, so the circularity tests apply differently than to a methods paper. The central claims are: (1) that the paper is more comprehensive and tutorial-like than prior surveys, (2) that deep learning enhances HSI across many tasks, (3) that HSI can be fused with LLMs as a 'high-brain LLM' direction, and (4) that the HSI market has a reported CAGR. None of these claims is derived by fitting a parameter to data and then predicting the same data, nor does any equation reduce to its own input by definition. The 'high-brain LLM' concept is explicitly framed as an emerging proposal ('An emerging area of focus', Section VI-E and Figure 22), not as a result forced by prior equations. The paper's comprehensiveness claim rests on an unverifiable PRISMA reporting (Section II omits search strings, record counts, screening decisions, and a flow diagram), but that is a reproducibility and evidentiary weakness, not circularity: the claim is not defined in terms of its own conclusion. The only self-citation found is reference [102], by co-author H.-N. Lee, cited in Section V-B as one item in a list of optimization algorithms ('optimization algorithms (gradient descent, Adam optimizer, proximal gradient methods, alternating least squares, and coordinate descent) [101], [102]'). This citation is incidental and not load-bearing: the section's content does not depend on the specific computational spectrometer result in [102], and no argument or 'uniqueness' assertion is imported from it. Accordingly, there are no circular steps to report and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The report introduces one invented entity, the high-brain LLM, which is speculative and lacks independent evidence. The survey's central claims rest on standard domain assumptions about linear unmixing, the transferability of LLMs, and the completeness of the PRISMA-based literature search; the latter is the most fragile because the selection details are not reported.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The linear mixture model P = R·F + E is the default model for spectral unmixing in this survey.
Section IV-D introduces this model and its constraints without discussing alternative nonlinear models in depth, which affects the survey's treatment of unmixing.
domain assumption A general-purpose LLM such as Llama 3.x can generate human-oriented alerts from hyperspectral features with minimal or no adaptation.
Section VI-E and Figure 22 describe the high-brain LLM pipeline as if this integration is straightforward, but no fine-tuning, feature encoding scheme, or experimental validation is provided.
domain assumption Following PRISMA guidelines as described yields a representative and unbiased set of references.
Section II claims PRISMA compliance but omits the search strings, screening counts, and exclusion logs required to assess representativeness, so the comprehensiveness claim rests on an unverified assumption.

invented entities (1)

High-brain LLM
purpose: A proposed integration of a hyperspectral camera with an LLM (e.g., Llama 3.x) to generate human-language outputs for tasks such as face anti-spoofing and low-visibility crash detection.
The paper presents this framework in Section VI-E and the Conclusion with a conceptual figure only; no implementation, benchmark, or falsifiable prediction is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AI-Driven HSI: Multimodality, Fusion, Challenges, and the Deep Learning Revolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PGTWISQA

@misc{pith2026250206894,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AI-Driven HSI: Multimodality, Fusion, Challenges, and the Deep Learning Revolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PGTWISQA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06894}
}

read the original abstract

Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) captures spatial and spectral data, enabling analysis of features invisible to conventional systems. The technology is vital in fields such as weather monitoring, food quality control, counterfeit detection, healthcare diagnostics, and extending into defense, agriculture, and industrial automation at the same time. HSI has advanced with improvements in spectral resolution, miniaturization, and computational methods. This study provides an overview of the HSI, its applications, challenges in data fusion and the role of deep learning models in processing HSI data. We discuss how integration of multimodal HSI with AI, particularly with deep learning, improves classification accuracy and operational efficiency. Deep learning enhances HSI analysis in areas like feature extraction, change detection, denoising unmixing, dimensionality reduction, landcover mapping, data augmentation, spectral construction and super resolution. An emerging focus is the fusion of hyperspectral cameras with large language models (LLMs), referred as highbrain LLMs, enabling the development of advanced applications such as low visibility crash detection and face antispoofing. We also highlight key players in HSI industry, its compound annual growth rate and the growing industrial significance. The purpose is to offer insight to both technical and non-technical audience, covering HSI's images, trends, and future directions, while providing valuable information on HSI datasets and software libraries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06894 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** HSI Publication Based on Different WOS Categories (1998-2025) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** HSI Publication Citations VS Publications (1992-2025) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (17 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: HSI Cube, Sampling, and Signature solids, and vacuum. The electromagnetic spectrum spans from radio waves to gamma rays, with visible light being a small segment. Each wavelength has varying energy levels, affecting how materials absorb or reflect light [16]. In hypers…

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Spectral Information Hyperspectral cameras capture contiguous wavelengths across visible, near-infrared (NIR), short-wave infrared (SWIR), and mid-wave infrared (MIR) spectra, achieving spectral resolutions as fine as a nanometer. Light interacting with the sensor is …

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: ElectromagneticSpectrumBandsandTheirWavelengths [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: HSIInformationinBands [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: HSI Image Acquisition Methods C. HSI Hypercube HSI hypercube is a three-dimensional dataset where two dimensions represent spatial information (height, width), and the third dimension represents spectral information (wavelength), shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Spectral Un-mixing E. Sub-Pixel Classification Sub-pixel classification in HSI identifies multiple materials within a single pixel, which is common due to limited 1https://kr.mathworks.com/help/images/getting-started-with-hyperspectralimage-analysis.html spatial reso…

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: HSI image representation The dimensions of the matrix X are B × (N × M), where each row corresponds to a spectral band, and each column corresponds to a pixel. B denotes the total number of spectral bands. Each band consists of N ×M spatial samples, corresponding to t…

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: CNN TABLE VIII APPLICATIONS OF CNNS IN HSI Application Description Ref. Feature Extraction/Reduction CNNs extract meaningful spatial and spectral features from high-dimensional hyperspectral data while reducing redundant information. This enhances efficiency and faci…

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Autoencoder and Stacked Autoencoder TABLE IX AUTOENCODERS Application Description Ref. Feature Extraction SAEs encode input data into a lower-dimensional latent space and decode it back, preserving spectral and spatial information. [160] Classification SAEs facilitate…

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: DBN H. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) A GAN consists of two components: the generator G and the discriminator D. The generator G captures the potential distribution of real data and generates new data, while the discriminator D is a binary classifier that eval…

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: RNN RNNs can effectively handle sequence learning by adding recurrent connections, allowing neurons to link with past outputs over time. Given an input sequence {x1, x2, . . . , xT } and hidden states {h1, h2, . . . , hT }, at time t, the node processes input xt and …

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: GRU tasks involving lengthy sequences. The key applications of RNNs, GRUs, and LSTMs are summarized in Table XII. These architectures are frequently combined with CNNs to integrate spatial features with sequential dependencies, thereby enhancing performance in HSI ana…

**Figure 18.** Figure 18: Pixel Level Fusion of HSI and MSI Images [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_18.png]

**Figure 19.** Figure 19: City: San Francisco, California, USA, from left to right the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_19.png]

**Figure 20.** Figure 20: HSI Application Market Share [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_20.png]

**Figure 21.** Figure 21: HSI Global Market Analysis 2018-2030 Table XVIII presents a list of key players in the HSI market along with their respective links. This table aims to bridge the information gap that practitioners and researchers often face when identifying leading organizations prov…

**Figure 22.** Figure 22: Methodology for High-brain LLM inference capabilities of LLMs, and developing lightweight models suitable for deployment in edge devices. Additionally, exploring the fusion of HSI with other sensing modalities, such as LiDAR and thermal imaging, could further strength…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

297 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

[1]

Recent trends of hyperspectral imaging technology,

M. S. Lee, K. S. Kim, G. Min, D. H. Son, J. E. Kim, and S. Kim, “Recent trends of hyperspectral imaging technology,” Electronics and Telecommunications Trends, vol. 34, pp. 86–97, February 2019

2019
[2]

A survey on computational spectral reconstruction methods from rgb to hyperspec- tral imaging,

J. Zhang, R. Su, Q. Fu, W. Ren, F. Heide, and Y . Nie, “A survey on computational spectral reconstruction methods from rgb to hyperspec- tral imaging,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, July 2022

2022
[3]

Hyperspectral imagery applications for precision agriculture - a systemic survey,

P. K. Sethy, C. Pandey, Y . K. Sahu, and S. K. Behera, “Hyperspectral imagery applications for precision agriculture - a systemic survey,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 81, p. 3005–3038, Nov. 2021

2021
[4]

Modern trends in hyperspectral image analysis: A review,

M. J. Khan, H. S. Khan, A. Yousaf, K. Khurshid, and A. Abbas, “Modern trends in hyperspectral image analysis: A review,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 14118–14129, 2018

2018
[5]

Hyperspectral imaging and its applications: A review,

A. Bhargava, A. Sachdeva, K. Sharma, M. H. Alsharif, P. Uthansakul, and M. Uthansakul, “Hyperspectral imaging and its applications: A review,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 12, p. e33208, 2024

2024
[6]

Multimodal hyperspectral remote sensing: An overview and perspective,

Y . Gu et al., “Multimodal hyperspectral remote sensing: An overview and perspective,” Science China Information Sciences , vol. 64, pp. 1– 24, 2021

2021
[7]

Deep learning for hyperspectral image classification: A survey,

V . Kumar, R. S. Singh, M. Rambabu, and Y . Dua, “Deep learning for hyperspectral image classification: A survey,” Computer Science Review, vol. 53, p. 100658, Aug. 2024

2024
[8]

A survey on hyperspectral image restoration: from the view of low-rank tensor approximation,

N. Liu, W. Li, Y . Wang, R. Tao, Q. Du, and J. Chanussot, “A survey on hyperspectral image restoration: from the view of low-rank tensor approximation,” Sci. China Inf. Sci. , vol. 66, Apr. 2023

2023

Show all 297 references

[9]

Hy- perspectral imaging: A review and trends towards medical imaging,

S. Karim, A. Qadir, U. Farooq, M. Shakir, and A. A. Laghari, “Hy- perspectral imaging: A review and trends towards medical imaging,” Curr. Med. Imaging Rev., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 417–427, 2022

2022
[10]

A review of hyperspectral imaging for nanoscale materials research,

X. Dong, M. Jakobi, S. Wang, M. H. K ¨ohler, X. Zhang, and A. W. Koch, “A review of hyperspectral imaging for nanoscale materials research,” Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., vol. 54, pp. 285–305, Apr. 2019

2019
[11]

A survey of graph and attention based hyper- spectral image classification methods for remote sensing data,

A. Vats and M. Suri, “A survey of graph and attention based hyper- spectral image classification methods for remote sensing data,” 2023

2023
[12]

Wavelength and texture feature selection for hyperspectral imaging: a systematic literature review,

M. Rogers, J. Blanc-Talon, M. Urschler, and P. Delmas, “Wavelength and texture feature selection for hyperspectral imaging: a systematic literature review,” J. Food Meas. Charact. , vol. 17, pp. 6039–6064, Dec. 2023

2023
[13]

Prisma 2020 explanation and elaboration: up- dated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews,

M. J. Page, D. Moher, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J. M. Tetzlaff, E. A. Akl, S. E. Brennan, R. Chou, J. Glanville, J. M. Grimshaw, A. Hr ´objartsson, M. M. Lalu, T. Li, E. W. Loder, E. Mayo-Wilson, S. McDonald, L. A. McGuinness, L. A. ...

2020
[14]

Systematic reviews,

D. U. M. C. L. . Archives, “Systematic reviews,” 2024. Last Updated: Jun 18, 2024 9:41 AM

2024
[15]

Hyperspectral image classification—traditional to deep models: A survey for future prospects,

M. Ahmad, S. Shabbir, S. K. Roy, D. Hong, X. Wu, J. Yao, A. M. Khan, M. Mazzara, S. Distefano, and J. Chanussot, “Hyperspectral image classification—traditional to deep models: A survey for future prospects,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Obser- vations and ...

2022
[16]

Fath, Encyclopedia of Ecology

B. Fath, Encyclopedia of Ecology . Elsevier Science, 2018

2018
[17]

Hyperspectral image acquisition methods and processing techniques based on traditional and deep learning methodologies-a study,

V . S. Swarupa and M. Devanathan, “Hyperspectral image acquisition methods and processing techniques based on traditional and deep learning methodologies-a study,” in 2022 Third International Confer- ence on Smart Technologies in Computing, Electrical and Electronics (ICSTCEE)...

2022
[18]

Application of hyperspectral imaging as a nondestructive technique for foodborne pathogen detection and characterization,

E. Bonah, X. Huang, J. H. Aheto, and R. Osae, “Application of hyperspectral imaging as a nondestructive technique for foodborne pathogen detection and characterization,” Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, vol. 16, p. 712–722, Oct. 2019

2019
[19]

Multispectral classification for in-line inspection sys- tems: Using multispectral imaging to classify foreign objects on a production line,

T. Tomasarson, “Multispectral classification for in-line inspection sys- tems: Using multispectral imaging to classify foreign objects on a production line,” Master’s thesis, University of Iceland, School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, June 2020. Master Thesis, Approved ...

2020
[20]

Object detection in hyperspectral images,

Z. A. Lone and A. R. Pais, “Object detection in hyperspectral images,” Digital Signal Processing , vol. 131, p. 103752, 2022

2022
[21]

Current advances in imaging spectroscopy and its state- of-the-art applications,

A. Zahra, R. Qureshi, M. Sajjad, F. Sadak, M. Nawaz, H. A. Khan, and M. Uzair, “Current advances in imaging spectroscopy and its state- of-the-art applications,” Expert Systems with Applications , vol. 238, p. 122172, 2024

2024
[22]

Hyperspectral band selection: A review,

W. Sun and Q. Du, “Hyperspectral band selection: A review,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 118–139, 2019

2019
[23]

Covariance-based band selection and its application to near-real-time hyperspectral target detection,

J.-H. Kim, J. Kim, Y . Yang, S. Kim, and H. S. Kim, “Covariance-based band selection and its application to near-real-time hyperspectral target detection,” Optical Engineering , vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 053101–053101, 2017

2017
[24]

A band selection method for airborne hyperspectral image based on chaotic binary coded gravitational search algorithm,

M. Wang, Y . Wan, Z. Ye, X. Gao, and X. Lai, “A band selection method for airborne hyperspectral image based on chaotic binary coded gravitational search algorithm,” Neurocomputing, vol. 273, pp. 57–67, 2018. BHATTI et. al.: AI-DRIVEN HSI: MULTIMODALITY , FUSION, CHALLENGES, A...

2018
[25]

Dual-clustering-based hyperspectral band selection by contextual analysis,

Y . Yuan, J. Lin, and Q. Wang, “Dual-clustering-based hyperspectral band selection by contextual analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Geo- science and Remote Sensing , vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1431–1445, 2015

2015
[26]

Band selection using sparse nonnegative matrix factorization with the thresholded earth’s mover distance for hyperspectral imagery classification,

W. Sun, W. Li, J. Li, and Y . M. Lai, “Band selection using sparse nonnegative matrix factorization with the thresholded earth’s mover distance for hyperspectral imagery classification,” Earth Science Infor- matics, vol. 8, pp. 907–918, 2015

2015
[27]

A kernel-based feature selection method for svm with rbf kernel for hyperspectral image classification,

B.-C. Kuo, H.-H. Ho, C.-H. Li, C.-C. Hung, and J.-S. Taur, “A kernel-based feature selection method for svm with rbf kernel for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 317– 326, 2013

2013
[28]

Salient band selection for hyperspectral image classification via manifold ranking,

Q. Wang, J. Lin, and Y . Yuan, “Salient band selection for hyperspectral image classification via manifold ranking,” IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems , vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1279–1289, 2016

2016
[29]

Hyperspectral band selection from statistical wavelet models,

S. Feng, Y . Itoh, M. Parente, and M. F. Duarte, “Hyperspectral band selection from statistical wavelet models,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 2111–2123, 2017

2017
[30]

Hyperspectral band selection based on a variable precision neighborhood rough set,

Y . Liu, H. Xie, L. Wang, and K. Tan, “Hyperspectral band selection based on a variable precision neighborhood rough set,” Applied optics, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 462–472, 2016

2016
[31]

Discriminative feature metric learning in the affinity propagation model for band selection in hyperspectral images,

C. Yang, Y . Tan, L. Bruzzone, L. Lu, and R. Guan, “Discriminative feature metric learning in the affinity propagation model for band selection in hyperspectral images,” Remote Sensing , vol. 9, no. 8, p. 782, 2017

2017
[32]

Discovering diverse subset for unsu- pervised hyperspectral band selection,

Y . Yuan, X. Zheng, and X. Lu, “Discovering diverse subset for unsu- pervised hyperspectral band selection,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 51–64, 2016

2016
[33]

Fast and robust self- representation method for hyperspectral band selection,

W. Sun, L. Tian, Y . Xu, D. Zhang, and Q. Du, “Fast and robust self- representation method for hyperspectral band selection,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 5087–5098, 2017

2017
[34]

Sparse hilbert schmidt independence criterion and surrogate-kernel-based feature selection for hyperspectral image classification,

B. B. Damodaran, N. Courty, and S. Lef `evre, “Sparse hilbert schmidt independence criterion and surrogate-kernel-based feature selection for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 2385–2398, 2017

2017
[35]

Segmented au- toencoders for unsupervised embedded hyperspectral band selection,

J. Tschannerl, J. Ren, J. Zabalza, and S. Marshall, “Segmented au- toencoders for unsupervised embedded hyperspectral band selection,” in 2018 7th European workshop on visual information processing (EUVIP), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2018

2018
[36]

Light sources and optics,

R. Magnusson, “Light sources and optics,” in Encyclopedia of Spec- troscopy and Spectrometry (J. C. Lindon, ed.), pp. 1158–1168, Oxford: Elsevier, 1999

1999
[37]

Review of short-wave infrared spectroscopy and imaging methods for biological tissue characterization,

R. H. Wilson, K. P. Nadeau, F. B. Jaworski, B. J. Tromberg, and A. J. Durkin, “Review of short-wave infrared spectroscopy and imaging methods for biological tissue characterization,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 20, no. 3, p. 030901, 2015

2015
[38]

A survey on hyperspectral remote sensing image compression,

F. Zhang, C. Chen, and Y . Wan, “A survey on hyperspectral remote sensing image compression,” in IGARSS 2023 - 2023 IEEE Interna- tional Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium , pp. 7400–7403, 2023

2023
[39]

Comprehensive review of hyperspectral image compression algorithms,

Y . Dua, V . Kumar, and R. S. Singh, “Comprehensive review of hyperspectral image compression algorithms,” Opt. Eng., vol. 59, Sept. 2020

2020
[40]

Dimension- ality reduction of hyperspectral images for classification using ran- domized independent component analysis,

C. Jayaprakash, B. B. Damodaran, S. V ., and K. Soman, “Dimension- ality reduction of hyperspectral images for classification using ran- domized independent component analysis,” in 2018 5th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) , pp. 492–...

2018
[41]

Strategies for dimensionality reduction in hyperspectral remote sensing: A comprehensive overview,

R. Vaddi, B. Phaneendra Kumar, P. Manoharan, L. Agilandeeswari, and V . Sangeetha, “Strategies for dimensionality reduction in hyperspectral remote sensing: A comprehensive overview,” The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences , vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 82–92, 2024

2024
[42]

Analysis and comparison of adaptive huffman coding and arithmetic coding algorithms,

P. Mbewe and S. D. Asare, “Analysis and comparison of adaptive huffman coding and arithmetic coding algorithms,” in 2017 13th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD) , pp. 178–185, 2017

2017
[43]

A view on spectral unmixing in hyper- spectral images,

M. R. V . Devi and S. Kalaivani, “A view on spectral unmixing in hyper- spectral images,” Far East Journal of Electronics and Communications, p. 23–32, Apr. 2016

2016
[44]

Dual- branch subpixel-guided network for hyperspectral image classification,

Z. Han, J. Yang, L. Gao, Z. Zeng, B. Zhang, and J. Chanussot, “Dual- branch subpixel-guided network for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 62, pp. 1– 13, 2024

2024
[45]

Cnn based sub-pixel mapping for hyperspectral images,

P. Arun, K. Buddhiraju, and A. Porwal, “Cnn based sub-pixel mapping for hyperspectral images,” Neurocomputing, vol. 311, pp. 51–64, 2018

2018
[46]

Spectral unmixing for the classification of hyperspectral images,

Y .-H. Tseng, “Spectral unmixing for the classification of hyperspectral images,” in International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. XXXIII, Part B7, (Amsterdam), pp. 1–8, National Cheng Kung University, China-Taipei, Department of Surveying Engineering, 2000

2000
[47]

Fusatnet: Dual attention based spectrospatial multimodal fusion network for hyperspectral and lidar classification,

S. Mohla, S. Pande, B. Banerjee, and S. Chaudhuri, “Fusatnet: Dual attention based spectrospatial multimodal fusion network for hyperspectral and lidar classification,” in 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) , pp. 416–425, 2020

2020
[48]

A review of spatial enhancement of hyperspectral remote sensing imaging techniques,

N. Aburaed, M. Q. Alkhatib, S. Marshall, J. Zabalza, and H. Al Ahmad, “A review of spatial enhancement of hyperspectral remote sensing imaging techniques,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 16, pp. 2275–2300, 2023

2023
[49]

Hyperspectral and sar image classification via multiscale interactive fusion network,

J. Wang, W. Li, Y . Gao, M. Zhang, R. Tao, and Q. Du, “Hyperspectral and sar image classification via multiscale interactive fusion network,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 10823–10837, 2022

2022
[50]

A deep-shallow fusion network with multidetail extractor and spectral attention for hyperspectral pansharpening,

Y .-W. Zhuo, T.-J. Zhang, J.-F. Hu, H.-X. Dou, T.-Z. Huang, and L.-J. Deng, “A deep-shallow fusion network with multidetail extractor and spectral attention for hyperspectral pansharpening,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol...

2022
[51]

Panchro- matic and hyperspectral image fusion: outcome of the 2022 whispers hyperspectral pansharpening challenge,

G. Vivone, A. Garzelli, Y . Xu, W. Liao, and J. Chanussot, “Panchro- matic and hyperspectral image fusion: outcome of the 2022 whispers hyperspectral pansharpening challenge,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 16, pp. 166–179, 2022

2022
[52]

A multi-sensor fusion framework based on coupled residual convolutional neural networks,

H. Li, P. Ghamisi, B. Rasti, Z. Wu, A. Shapiro, M. Schultz, and A. Zipf, “A multi-sensor fusion framework based on coupled residual convolutional neural networks,” Remote sensing , vol. 12, no. 12, p. 2067, 2020

2020
[53]

Hsr- diff: Hyperspectral image super-resolution via conditional diffusion models,

C. Wu, D. Wang, Y . Bai, H. Mao, Y . Li, and Q. Shen, “Hsr- diff: Hyperspectral image super-resolution via conditional diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 7083–7093, 2023

2023
[54]

Crops fine classification in airborne hyperspectral imagery based on multi-feature fusion and deep learning,

L. Wei, K. Wang, Q. Lu, Y . Liang, H. Li, Z. Wang, R. Wang, and L. Cao, “Crops fine classification in airborne hyperspectral imagery based on multi-feature fusion and deep learning,” Remote Sensing , vol. 13, no. 15, p. 2917, 2021

2021
[55]

Big data and machine learning with hyperspectral information in agriculture,

K. L.-M. Ang and J. K. P. Seng, “Big data and machine learning with hyperspectral information in agriculture,” IEEE Access , vol. 9, pp. 36699–36718, 2021

2021
[56]

Multimodal deep learning and visible-light and hyperspectral imaging for fruit maturity estima- tion,

C. A. Garillos-Manliguez and J. Y . Chiang, “Multimodal deep learning and visible-light and hyperspectral imaging for fruit maturity estima- tion,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 4, 2021

2021
[57]

Analysis of hyperspectral scattering images using locally linear embedding algorithm for apple mealiness classification,

R. Huang, Q. Zhu, B. Wang, and R. Lu, “Analysis of hyperspectral scattering images using locally linear embedding algorithm for apple mealiness classification,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture , vol. 89, pp. 175–181, 2012

2012
[58]

Development of short- wavelength near-infrared spectral imaging for grain color classifica- tion,

D. Archibald, C. Thai, and F. Dowell, “Development of short- wavelength near-infrared spectral imaging for grain color classifica- tion,” Precision Agriculture Biological Quality, vol. 3543, pp. 189–198, 1999

1999
[59]

Role of machine learning in medical research: A survey,

A. Garg and V . Mago, “Role of machine learning in medical research: A survey,” Computer Science Review , vol. 40, p. 100370, 2021

2021
[60]

A multimodal reflectance hyperspectral imaging system for monitoring wound healing in below knee amputations,

K. J. Zuzak, T. J. Perumanoor, S. C. Naik, M. Mandhale, and E. H. Livingston, “A multimodal reflectance hyperspectral imaging system for monitoring wound healing in below knee amputations,” in 2007 IEEE Dallas Engineering in Medicine and Biology Workshop , pp. 16– 18, 2007

2007
[61]

A comparative study of deep learning frameworks based on short-term power load forecasting experiments,

J. Zhang, Y . Zhang, and Y . Lu, “A comparative study of deep learning frameworks based on short-term power load forecasting experiments,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2005, p. 012070, aug 2021

2005
[62]

Backbones-review: Feature extractor networks for deep learning and deep reinforcement learning approaches in computer vision,

O. Elharrouss, Y . Akbari, N. Almadeed, and S. Al-Maadeed, “Backbones-review: Feature extractor networks for deep learning and deep reinforcement learning approaches in computer vision,” Computer Science Review, vol. 53, p. 100645, 2024

2024
[63]

Deep & dense convolutional neural network for hyperspectral image classification,

M. E. Paoletti, J. M. Haut, J. Plaza, and A. Plaza, “Deep & dense convolutional neural network for hyperspectral image classification,” Remote Sensing, vol. 10, no. 9, 2018

2018
[64]

A compar- ative assessment of ensemble-based machine learning and maximum likelihood methods for mapping seagrass using sentinel-2 imagery in tauranga harbor, new zealand,

N. T. Ha, M. Manley-Harris, T. D. Pham, and I. Hawes, “A compar- ative assessment of ensemble-based machine learning and maximum likelihood methods for mapping seagrass using sentinel-2 imagery in tauranga harbor, new zealand,” Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 3, 2020

2020
[65]

Deep learning-based man-made object detection from hyperspectral data,

K. Makantasis, K. Karantzalos, A. Doulamis, and K. Loupos, “Deep learning-based man-made object detection from hyperspectral data,” BHATTI et. al.: AI-DRIVEN HSI: MULTIMODALITY , FUSION, CHALLENGES, AND THE DEEP LEARNING REVOLUTION 29 in Advances in Visual Computing (G. Bebis,...

2015
[66]

A deep learning- based hyperspectral object classification approach via imbalanced train- ing samples handling,

M. T. Islam, M. R. Islam, M. P. Uddin, and A. Ulhaq, “A deep learning- based hyperspectral object classification approach via imbalanced train- ing samples handling,” Remote Sensing, vol. 15, no. 14, 2023

2023
[67]

Hyperspectral image classification with deep learning models,

X. Yang, Y . Ye, X. Li, R. Lau, X. Zhang, and X. Huang, “Hyperspectral image classification with deep learning models,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. PP, pp. 1–16, 04 2018

2018
[68]

Unsupervised spectral–spatial fea- ture learning via deep residual conv–deconv network for hyperspectral image classification,

L. Mou, P. Ghamisi, and X. X. Zhu, “Unsupervised spectral–spatial fea- ture learning via deep residual conv–deconv network for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 391–406, 2018

2018
[69]

Convolutional recurrent neural networks forhy- perspectral data classification,

H. Wu and S. Prasad, “Convolutional recurrent neural networks forhy- perspectral data classification,” Remote Sensing , vol. 9, p. 298, Mar. 2017

2017
[70]

Long short-term memory neural networks for online disturbance detection in satellite image time series,

Y .-L. Kong, Q. Huang, C. Wang, J. Chen, J. Chen, and D. He, “Long short-term memory neural networks for online disturbance detection in satellite image time series,” Remote Sensing , vol. 10, p. 452, Mar. 2018

2018
[71]

Hyperspectral image clas- sification using spectral-spatial lstms,

F. Zhou, R. Hang, Q. Liu, and X. Yuan, “Hyperspectral image clas- sification using spectral-spatial lstms,” in Computer Vision (J. Yang, Q. Hu, M.-M. Cheng, L. Wang, Q. Liu, X. Bai, and D. Meng, eds.), (Singapore), pp. 577–588, Springer Singapore, 2017

2017
[72]

Stacked autoencoder-based deep learning for remote-sensing image classifica- tion: a case study of african land-cover mapping,

W. Li, H. Fu, L. Yu, P. Gong, D. Feng, C. Li, and N. Clinton, “Stacked autoencoder-based deep learning for remote-sensing image classifica- tion: a case study of african land-cover mapping,”International Journal of Remote Sensing , vol. 37, no. 23, pp. 5632–5646, 2016

2016
[73]

Spectral- spatial classification of hyperspectral imagery based on stacked sparse autoencoder and random forest,

C. Zhao, X. Wan, G. Zhao, B. Cui, W. Liu, and B. Qi, “Spectral- spatial classification of hyperspectral imagery based on stacked sparse autoencoder and random forest,” European Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 47–63, 2017

2017
[74]

Self-taught feature learning for hyper- spectral image classification,

R. Kemker and C. Kanan, “Self-taught feature learning for hyper- spectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2693–2705, 2017

2017
[76]

Semisupervised hyperspectral image classification based on generative adversarial networks and spectral angle distance,

Y . Zhan, Y . Wang, and X. Yu, “Semisupervised hyperspectral image classification based on generative adversarial networks and spectral angle distance,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, Dec. 2023

2023
[77]

Generative adversarial network with transformer for hyperspectral image classification,

S. Hao, Y . Xia, and Y . Ye, “Generative adversarial network with transformer for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , vol. 20, pp. 1–5, 2023

2023
[78]

Hyperspectral remote sensing image change detection based on tensor and deep learning,

F. Huang, Y . Yu, and T. Feng, “Hyperspectral remote sensing image change detection based on tensor and deep learning,” Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, vol. 58, pp. 233–244, 2019

2019
[80]

Double deep q-network for hyperspectral image band selection in land cover classification applications,

H. Yang, M. Chen, G. Wu, J. Wang, Y . Wang, and Z. Hong, “Double deep q-network for hyperspectral image band selection in land cover classification applications,” Remote Sensing, vol. 15, p. 682, Jan. 2023

2023
[81]

Resnet incorporating the fusion data of rgb & hyperspectral images improves classification accuracy of vegetable soybean freshness,

Y . Bu, J. Hu, C. Chen, S. Bai, Z. Chen, T. Hu, G. Zhang, N. Liu, C. Cai, Y . Li, Q. Xuan, Y . Wang, Z. Su, Y . Xiang, and Y . Gong, “Resnet incorporating the fusion data of rgb & hyperspectral images improves classification accuracy of vegetable soybean freshness,” Sci- entif...

2024
[82]

Resnet based hybrid convolution lstm for hyperspectral image classification,

A. Banerjee and D. Banik, “Resnet based hybrid convolution lstm for hyperspectral image classification,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 83, p. 45059–45070, Oct. 2023

2023
[83]

Spectral-spatial attention denosie resnet for hyperspectral image classification,

F. Xiang and Z. Wang, “Spectral-spatial attention denosie resnet for hyperspectral image classification,” in 2024 IEEE 9th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Applications (ICCIA) , pp. 125–129, 2024

2024
[84]

Adapting vgg16 and resnet50 for cross-domain transfer learning on hyperspectral image,

T. Jannat and M. A. Hossain, “Adapting vgg16 and resnet50 for cross-domain transfer learning on hyperspectral image,” in 2024 6th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information & Communication Technology (ICEEICT) , pp. 1350–1355, 2024

2024
[85]

Hyperspec- tral image classification model using squeeze and excitation network with deep learning,

R. T, P. Valsalan, A. J, J. M, R. S, C. P. Latha G, and A. T, “Hyperspec- tral image classification model using squeeze and excitation network with deep learning,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience , vol. 2022, p. 1–9, Aug. 2022

2022
[86]

Examination of lemon bruising using different cnn-based classifiers and local spectral-spatial hyperspectral imaging,

R. Pourdarbani, S. Sabzi, M. Dehghankar, M. H. Rohban, and J. I. Arribas, “Examination of lemon bruising using different cnn-based classifiers and local spectral-spatial hyperspectral imaging,” Algo- rithms, vol. 16, p. 113, February 2023

2023
[87]

Vgg convolutional neural network classification of hyper- spectral images of skin neoplasms,

B. V . Grechkin, V . O. Vinikurov, Y . A. Khristoforova, and I. A. Matveeva, “Vgg convolutional neural network classification of hyper- spectral images of skin neoplasms,” Journal of Biomedical Photonics & Engineering, vol. 9, p. 040304, Nov. 2023

2023
[88]

Nondestructive identification of soybean protein in minced chicken meat based on hyperspectral imaging and vgg16-svm,

J. Sun, F. Yang, J. Cheng, S. Wang, and L. Fu, “Nondestructive identification of soybean protein in minced chicken meat based on hyperspectral imaging and vgg16-svm,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 125, p. 105713, Jan. 2024

2024
[89]

A lightweight model of vgg-16 for remote sensing image classification,

M. Ye, N. Ruiwen, Z. Chang, G. He, H. Tianli, L. Shijun, S. Yu, Z. Tong, and G. Ying, “A lightweight model of vgg-16 for remote sensing image classification,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Ap- plied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 14, p. 6916–6922, 2021

2021
[90]

Comparison of densenet-121 and mobilenet for coral reef classification,

H. P. Hadi, E. H. Rachmawanto, and R. R. Ali, “Comparison of densenet-121 and mobilenet for coral reef classification,” MATRIK : Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer , vol. 23, p. 333–342, Mar. 2024

2024
[91]

A novel image classification approach via dense-mobilenet models,

W. Wang, Y . Li, T. Zou, X. Wang, J. You, and Y . Luo, “A novel image classification approach via dense-mobilenet models,” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2020, no. 1, p. 7602384, 2020

2020
[92]

Deep 3d-multiscale densenet for hyperspectral image classification based on spatial-spectral information,

H. Song, W. Yang, H. Yuan, and H. Bufford, “Deep 3d-multiscale densenet for hyperspectral image classification based on spatial-spectral information,” Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing , vol. 26, no. 4, p. 1441–1458, 2020

2020
[93]

Aircraft detection in satellite imagery using deep learning-based object detectors,

B. Azam, M. J. Khan, F. A. Bhatti, A. R. M. Maud, S. F. Hussain, A. J. Hashmi, and K. Khurshid, “Aircraft detection in satellite imagery using deep learning-based object detectors,” Microprocessors and Mi- crosystems, vol. 94, p. 104630, Oct. 2022

2022
[94]

Recognition and detection of diabetic retinopathy using densenet-65 based faster-rcnn,

S. Albahli, T. Nazir, A. Irtaza, and A. Javed, “Recognition and detection of diabetic retinopathy using densenet-65 based faster-rcnn,” Computers, Materials and Continua , vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 1333–1351, 2021

2021
[95]

Object detection in hyperspectral images,

L. Yan, M. Zhao, X. Wang, Y . Zhang, and J. Chen, “Object detection in hyperspectral images,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. PP, pp. 1– 1, 02 2021

2021
[96]

Surveying you only look once (yolo) multispectral object detection advancements, applications and challenges,

J. E. Gallagher and E. J. Oughton, “Surveying you only look once (yolo) multispectral object detection advancements, applications and challenges,” 2024

2024
[97]

Hyperspectral image target recognition based on yolo model,

J.-j. Ying, S.-q. Yin, W.-y. Yang, H. Liu, and X. Li, “Hyperspectral image target recognition based on yolo model,” p. 39, 04 2024

2024
[98]

Sva-ssd: saliency visual attention single shot detector for building detection in low contrast high-resolution satellite images,

A. I. Shahin and S. Almotairi, “Sva-ssd: saliency visual attention single shot detector for building detection in low contrast high-resolution satellite images,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 7, p. e772, Nov. 2021

2021
[99]

Piecewise weighted smoothing regularization in tight framelet domain for hyperspectral image restora- tion,

F. Ma, S. Liu, F. Yang, and G. Xu, “Piecewise weighted smoothing regularization in tight framelet domain for hyperspectral image restora- tion,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, p. 1955–1969, 2023

1955
[100]

Hyperspectral super- resolution via coupled tensor ring factorization,

W. He, Y . Chen, N. Yokoya, C. Li, and Q. Zhao, “Hyperspectral super- resolution via coupled tensor ring factorization,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 122, p. 108280, Feb. 2022

2022
[101]

Deep amended gradient descent for efficient spectral reconstruction from single rgb images,

Z. Zhu, H. Liu, J. Hou, S. Jia, and Q. Zhang, “Deep amended gradient descent for efficient spectral reconstruction from single rgb images,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging , vol. 7, p. 1176–1188, 2021

2021
[102]

Mass production-enabled computational spectrometers based on multilayer thin films,

C. Kim, P. Ni, K. R. Lee, and H.-N. Lee, “Mass production-enabled computational spectrometers based on multilayer thin films,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 4053, 2022

2022
[104]

Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images using improved ihs and pca mergers based on wavelet decomposition,

M. Gonz ´alez-Aud´ıcana, J. L. Saleta, R. G. Catal ´an, and R. Garc ´ıa, “Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images using improved ihs and pca mergers based on wavelet decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote sensing , vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1291–1299, 2004

2004
[105]

Using new independent component analysis (ica) based spectral index to extract and map built- ups of india’s sacred district ‘mathura’,

E. Baranwal, S. Ahmad, and S. M. Mudassir, “Using new independent component analysis (ica) based spectral index to extract and map built- ups of india’s sacred district ‘mathura’,” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, vol. 126, p. 103118, 2022

2022
[106]

Clustering for hsi hyperspectral image with weighted pca and ica,

C.-F. Li, L. Liu, Y .-M. Lei, J.-Y . Yin, J.-j. Zhao, and X.-K. Sun, “Clustering for hsi hyperspectral image with weighted pca and ica,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems , vol. 32, pp. 3729–3737, 04 2017. BHATTI et. al.: AI-DRIVEN HSI: MULTIMODALITY , FUSION, CHALLENGES,...

2017
[107]

Feature extrac- tion for hyperspectral remote sensing image using weighted pca-ica,

L. Liu, C.-f. Li, Y .-m. Lei, J.-y. Yin, and J.-j. Zhao, “Feature extrac- tion for hyperspectral remote sensing image using weighted pca-ica,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences , vol. 10, July 2017

2017
[108]

Hyperspectral enhanced imaging analysis of nanoparticles using machine learning methods,

K. Lim and A. Ardekani, “Hyperspectral enhanced imaging analysis of nanoparticles using machine learning methods,” Nanoscale Advances, vol. 6, no. 20, p. 5171–5180, 2024

2024
[109]

Spectral–spatial feature extraction with dual graph autoencoder for hyperspectral image clustering,

Y . Zhang, Y . Wang, X. Chen, X. Jiang, and Y . Zhou, “Spectral–spatial feature extraction with dual graph autoencoder for hyperspectral image clustering,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 8500–8511, 2022

2022
[110]

A 3d-deep cnn based feature extraction and hyperspectral image classification,

M. Kanthi, T. H. Sarma, and C. S. Bindu, “A 3d-deep cnn based feature extraction and hyperspectral image classification,” in 2020 IEEE India Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (InGARSS) , pp. 229–232, 2020

2020
[111]

Spectral-spatial feature extraction based cnn for hyperspec- tral image classification,

Y . Quan, S. Dong, W. Feng, G. Dauphin, G. Zhao, Y . Wang, and M. Xing, “Spectral-spatial feature extraction based cnn for hyperspec- tral image classification,” in IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium , p. 485–488, IEEE, Sept. 2020

2020
[112]

Detecting forest canopy change due to insect activity using landsat mss,

R. F. Nelson, “Detecting forest canopy change due to insect activity using landsat mss,” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, vol. 49, pp. 1303–1314, 1983

1983
[113]

A multilevel multimodal fusion transformer for remote sensing semantic segmentation,

X. Ma, X. Zhang, M.-O. Pun, and M. Liu, “A multilevel multimodal fusion transformer for remote sensing semantic segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 62, pp. 1–15, 2024

2024
[114]

Hyperspec- tral image change detection based on gated spectral–spatial–temporal attention network with spectral similarity filtering,

H. Yu, H. Yang, L. Gao, J. Hu, A. Plaza, and B. Zhang, “Hyperspec- tral image change detection based on gated spectral–spatial–temporal attention network with spectral similarity filtering,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 62, pp. 1–13, 2024

2024
[115]

Hyper- spectral image classification based on multi-level spectral-spatial trans- former network,

H. Yang, H. Yu, D. Hong, Z. Xu, Y . Wang, and M. Song, “Hyper- spectral image classification based on multi-level spectral-spatial trans- former network,” in 2022 12th Workshop on Hyperspectral Imaging and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS) , pp. 1–4, 2022

2022
[116]

A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales,

J. Cohen, “A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales,” Educational and Psychological Measurement , vol. 20, pp. 37 – 46, 1960

1960
[117]

An introduction to roc analysis,

T. Fawcett, “An introduction to roc analysis,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 861–874, 2006. ROC Analysis in Pattern Recognition

2006
[118]

Hyperspectral image dataset for benchmarking on salient object detection,

N. Imamoglu, Y . Oishi, X. Zhang, G. Ding, Y . Fang, T. Kouyama, and R. Nakamura, “Hyperspectral image dataset for benchmarking on salient object detection,” in 2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) , pp. 1–3, 2018

2018
[119]

Meta-learning based hyperspectral target detection using siamese network,

Y . Wang, X. Chen, F. Wang, M. Song, and C. Yu, “Meta-learning based hyperspectral target detection using siamese network,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–13, 2022

2022
[120]

Comparative analysis of machine learning and deep learning algo- rithms for software effort estimation,

A. G. Priya Varshini, K. Anitha Kumari, D. Janani, and S. Soundariya, “Comparative analysis of machine learning and deep learning algo- rithms for software effort estimation,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1767, p. 012019, Feb. 2021

2021
[121]

Deep learning in hyperspectral image reconstruction from single rgb images—a case study on tomato quality parameters,

J. Zhao, D. Kechasov, B. Rewald, G. Bodner, M. Verheul, N. Clarke, and J. L. Clarke, “Deep learning in hyperspectral image reconstruction from single rgb images—a case study on tomato quality parameters,” Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 19, 2020

2020
[122]

Root-mean-square error (rmse) or mean absolute error (mae): when to use them or not,

T. O. Hodson, “Root-mean-square error (rmse) or mean absolute error (mae): when to use them or not,” Geoscientific Model Development , vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 5481–5487, 2022

2022
[123]

Hyperspectral image super- resolution with deep priors and degradation model inversion,

X. Wang, J. Chen, and C. Richard, “Hyperspectral image super- resolution with deep priors and degradation model inversion,” in ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pp. 2814–2818, 2022

2022
[124]

Hyperspectral image superresolution by transfer learning,

Y . Yuan, X. Zheng, and X. Lu, “Hyperspectral image superresolution by transfer learning,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1963–1974, 2017

1963
[125]

A comprehensive survey on gait analysis: History, parameters, approaches, pose estimation, and future work,

D. Sethi, S. Bharti, and C. Prakash, “A comprehensive survey on gait analysis: History, parameters, approaches, pose estimation, and future work,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine , vol. 129, p. 102314, July 2022

2022
[126]

An fpga-oriented hw/sw codesign of lucy-richardson deconvolution algorithm for hyperspectral images,

K. Avagian, M. Orlandi ´c, and T. A. Johansen, “An fpga-oriented hw/sw codesign of lucy-richardson deconvolution algorithm for hyperspectral images,” in 2019 8th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Com- puting (MECO), pp. 1–6, 2019

2019
[127]

Hyperspectral and multispectral image fusion based on deep attention network,

Q. Yang, Y . Xu, Z. Wu, and Z. Wei, “Hyperspectral and multispectral image fusion based on deep attention network,” in 2019 10th Workshop on Hyperspectral Imaging and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS), pp. 1–5, 2019

2019
[128]

Wald, Data Fusion

L. Wald, Data Fusion. Definitions and Architectures - Fusion of Images of Different Spatial Resolutions . Presses de l’Ecole, Ecole des Mines de Paris, Paris, France, 2002. ISBN 2-911762-38-X

2002
[129]

The spectral image processing system (sips)—interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data,

F. A. Kruse, A. Lefkoff, y. J. Boardman, K. Heidebrecht, A. Shapiro, P. Barloon, and A. Goetz, “The spectral image processing system (sips)—interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data,” Remote sensing of environment , vol. 44, no. 2-3, pp. 145–163, 1993

1993
[130]

Non-linear spectral unmixing: A case study on mangalore aviris-ng hyperspectral data,

D. Shah, Y . N. Trivedi, and T. Zaveri, “Non-linear spectral unmixing: A case study on mangalore aviris-ng hyperspectral data,” in 2020 IEEE Bombay Section Signature Conference (IBSSC) , pp. 11–15, 2020

2020
[131]

Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,

Z. Wang, A. Bovik, H. Sheikh, and E. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Trans- actions on Image Processing , vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, 2004

2004
[132]

A similarity-based ranking method for hyperspectral band selection,

B. Xu, X. Li, W. Hou, Y . Wang, and Y . Wei, “A similarity-based ranking method for hyperspectral band selection,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 9585–9599, 2021

2021
[133]

Deep convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,

W. Hu, Y . Huang, L. Wei, F. Zhang, and H. Li, “Deep convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2015, p. 1–12, 2015

2015
[134]

Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted win- dows,

Z. Liu, Y . Lin, Y . Cao, H. Hu, Y . Wei, Z. Zhang, S. Lin, and B. Guo, “Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted win- dows,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp. 10012–10022, 2021

2021
[135]

Spatial-spectral attention bilateral network for hyperspectral unmixing,

Z. Yang, M. Xu, S. Liu, H. Sheng, and H. Zheng, “Spatial-spectral attention bilateral network for hyperspectral unmixing,” IEEE Geo- science and Remote Sensing Letters , 2023

2023
[136]

Group convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,

X. Li, M. Ding, and A. Pi ˇzurica, “Group convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) , pp. 639–643, 2019

2019
[137]

Convolutional neu- ral network for hyperspectral data analysis and effective wavelengths selection,

Y . Liu, S. Zhou, W. Han, W. Liu, Z. Qiu, and C. Li, “Convolutional neu- ral network for hyperspectral data analysis and effective wavelengths selection,” Analytica Chimica Acta , vol. 1086, pp. 46–54, 2019

2019
[138]

Hyperspectral image classification using a hybrid 3d-2d convolutional neural networks,

S. Ghaderizadeh, D. Abbasi-Moghadam, A. Sharifi, N. Zhao, and A. Tariq, “Hyperspectral image classification using a hybrid 3d-2d convolutional neural networks,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 14, pp. 7570– 7588, 2021

2021
[139]

Enhanced hyperspectral image classification through pretrained cnn model for robust spatial feature extraction,

R. N. Giri, R. R. Janghel, S. K. Pandey, H. Govil, and A. Sinha, “Enhanced hyperspectral image classification through pretrained cnn model for robust spatial feature extraction,” Journal of Optics, vol. 53, p. 2287–2300, Nov. 2023

2023
[140]

Deep feature extraction and classification of hyperspectral images based on convolu- tional neural networks,

Y . Chen, H. Jiang, C. Li, X. Jia, and P. Ghamisi, “Deep feature extraction and classification of hyperspectral images based on convolu- tional neural networks,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 6232–6251, 2016

2016
[141]

Hyperspectral image classification using cnn with spectral and spatial features integration,

R. Vaddi and P. Manoharan, “Hyperspectral image classification using cnn with spectral and spatial features integration,” Infrared Physics & Technology, vol. 107, p. 103296, June 2020

2020
[142]

Cnn-based target detection in hyperspectral imagery,

J. Du, Z. Li, and H. Sun, “Cnn-based target detection in hyperspectral imagery,” in IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium , pp. 2761–2764, 2018

2018
[143]

Target detection of hyperspectral image based on faster r-cnn with data set adjustment and parameter turning,

X. Liu, C. Wang, H. Wang, M. Fu, Y . Feng, S. Bourennane, Q. Sun, and L. Ma, “Target detection of hyperspectral image based on faster r-cnn with data set adjustment and parameter turning,” in OCEANS 2019 - Marseille , pp. 1–8, 2019

2019
[144]

Convolutional neural network target detection in hyperspectral imaging for maritime surveillance,

S. Freitas, H. Silva, J. M. Almeida, and E. Silva, “Convolutional neural network target detection in hyperspectral imaging for maritime surveillance,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems , vol. 16, May 2019

2019
[145]

Exploring an application-oriented land-based hyperspectral target detection frame- work based on 3d–2d cnn and transfer learning,

J. Zhao, G. Wang, B. Zhou, J. Ying, and J. Liu, “Exploring an application-oriented land-based hyperspectral target detection frame- work based on 3d–2d cnn and transfer learning,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing , vol. 2024, Mar. 2024

2024
[146]

Semi-supervised learning via convolutional neural network for hyperspectral image classification,

Z. Ling, X. Li, W. Zou, and S. Guo, “Semi-supervised learning via convolutional neural network for hyperspectral image classification,” in 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) , pp. 1–6, 2018

2018
[147]

Semi-active convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,

J. Yao, X. Cao, D. Hong, X. Wu, D. Meng, J. Chanussot, and Z. Xu, “Semi-active convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–15, 2022. BHATTI et. al.: AI-DRIVEN HSI: MULTIMODALITY , FU...

2022
[148]

Semi-supervised deep learning for hyperspectral image classification,

X. Kang, B. Zhuo, and P. Duan, “Semi-supervised deep learning for hyperspectral image classification,” Remote Sensing Letters , vol. 10, p. 353–362, Jan. 2019

2019
[149]

Hyperspectral unmixing via deep convolutional neural networks,

X. Zhang, Y . Sun, J. Zhang, P. Wu, and L. Jiao, “Hyperspectral unmixing via deep convolutional neural networks,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1755–1759, 2018

2018
[150]

Hyper- spectral unmixing using deep convolutional autoencoder,

M. M. Elkholy, M. Mostafa, H. M. Ebied, and M. F. Tolba, “Hyper- spectral unmixing using deep convolutional autoencoder,”International Journal of Remote Sensing , vol. 41, p. 4799–4819, Mar. 2020

2020
[151]

A 3d-cnn framework for hyperspectral unmixing with spectral variability,

M. Zhao, S. Shi, J. Chen, and N. Dobigeon, “A 3d-cnn framework for hyperspectral unmixing with spectral variability,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , pp. 1–14, 2022. HAL Id: hal- 03574297. Submitted on 16 Feb 2022

2022
[152]

Hy- perspectral image denoising via self-modulating convolutional neural networks,

O. Torun, S. E. Yuksel, E. Erdem, N. Imamoglu, and A. Erdem, “Hy- perspectral image denoising via self-modulating convolutional neural networks,” Signal Processing, vol. 214, p. 109248, 2024

2024
[153]

Sure based convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image denoising,

H. V . Nguyen, M. O. Ulfarsson, and J. R. Sveinsson, “Sure based convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image denoising,” in IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, pp. 1784–1787, 2020

2020
[154]

A single model cnn for hyperspectral image denoising,

A. Maffei, J. M. Haut, M. E. Paoletti, J. Plaza, L. Bruzzone, and A. Plaza, “A single model cnn for hyperspectral image denoising,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 58, p. 2516–2529, Apr. 2020

2020
[155]

Effective and efficient dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral image using cnn and lstm network,

H. Tulapurkar, B. Banerjee, and B. K. Mohan, “Effective and efficient dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral image using cnn and lstm network,” in 2020 IEEE India Geoscience and Remote Sensing Sym- posium (InGARSS), pp. 213–216, 2020

2020
[156]

Hyperspectral image classification based on convolutional neural network and dimension reduction,

X. Liu, Q. Sun, B. Liu, B. Huang, and M. Fu, “Hyperspectral image classification based on convolutional neural network and dimension reduction,” in 2017 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC) , pp. 1686– 1690, 2017

2017
[157]

Hyperspectral image classification with attention-aided cnns,

R. Hang, Z. Li, Q. Liu, P. Ghamisi, and S. S. Bhattacharyya, “Hyperspectral image classification with attention-aided cnns,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2281–2293, 2021

2021
[158]

Feature fusion: Graph attention network and cnn combing for hyperspectral image classification,

P. Qikun, X. Xiaoxi, C. Qi, P. Chundi, and C. Guo, “Feature fusion: Graph attention network and cnn combing for hyperspectral image classification,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Control and Computer Vision , ICCCV ’22, (New York, NY , USA), p. 171–178,...

2022
[159]

M3fusion: A deep learning architecture for multiscale multimodal multitemporal satellite data fusion,

P. Benedetti, D. Ienco, R. Gaetano, K. Ose, R. G. Pensa, et al. , “M3fusion: A deep learning architecture for multiscale multimodal multitemporal satellite data fusion,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 493...

2018
[160]

Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral image using autoencoders,

Z. Lin, Y . Chen, X. Zhao, and G. Wang, “Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral image using autoencoders,” in 2013 9th international conference on information, Communications & Signal Processing , pp. 1–5, IEEE, 2013

2013
[161]

Srun: Spectral regularized unsupervised networks for hyperspectral target detection,

W. Xie, J. Yang, J. Lei, Y . Li, Q. Du, and G. He, “Srun: Spectral regularized unsupervised networks for hyperspectral target detection,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 1463–1474, 2019

2019
[162]

Object detection in optical remote sensing images based on weakly supervised learning and high-level feature learning,

J. Han, D. Zhang, G. Cheng, L. Guo, and J. Ren, “Object detection in optical remote sensing images based on weakly supervised learning and high-level feature learning,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 3325–3337, 2014

2014
[163]

Hyperspectral anomaly change detection based on autoencoder,

M. Hu, C. Wu, L. Zhang, and B. Du, “Hyperspectral anomaly change detection based on autoencoder,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 14, pp. 3750– 3762, 2021

2021
[164]

Stacked denoise autoencoder based feature extraction and classification for hyperspectral images,

C. Xing, L. Ma, and X. Yang, “Stacked denoise autoencoder based feature extraction and classification for hyperspectral images,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2016, no. 1, p. 3632943, 2016

2016
[165]

Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders,

P. Vincent, H. Larochelle, Y . Bengio, and P.-A. Manzagol, “Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders,” in Pro- ceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning , pp. 1096–1103, 2008

2008
[166]

A noise estimation method for hyperspectral image based on stacked autoencoder,

L. Deng, B. Zhou, J. Ying, and R. Zhao, “A noise estimation method for hyperspectral image based on stacked autoencoder,” IEEE Access, 2023

2023
[167]

Learning compact and discriminative stacked autoencoder for hyperspectral image classifica- tion,

P. Zhou, J. Han, G. Cheng, and B. Zhang, “Learning compact and discriminative stacked autoencoder for hyperspectral image classifica- tion,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 4823–4833, 2019

2019
[168]

Two-stage multi- dimensional convolutional stacked autoencoder network model for hy- perspectral images classification,

Y . Bai, X. Sun, Y . Ji, W. Fu, and J. Zhang, “Two-stage multi- dimensional convolutional stacked autoencoder network model for hy- perspectral images classification,” Multimedia Tools and Applications , vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 23489–23508, 2024

2024
[169]

Deep learning techniques for hyperspectral image analysis in agriculture: A review,

M. F. Guerri, C. Distante, P. Spagnolo, F. Bougourzi, and A. Taleb- Ahmed, “Deep learning techniques for hyperspectral image analysis in agriculture: A review,” ISPRS Open Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 12, p. 100062, 2024

2024
[170]

Multiple deep-belief-network-based spectral- spatial classification of hyperspectral images,

A. Mughees and L. Tao, “Multiple deep-belief-network-based spectral- spatial classification of hyperspectral images,” Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 183–194, 2019

2019
[171]

A new hyperspectral image classification method based on spatial-spectral features,

Q. Shenming, L. Xiang, and G. Zhihua, “A new hyperspectral image classification method based on spatial-spectral features,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, Jan. 2022

2022
[172]

Dimensionality reduction using deep belief network in big data case study: Hyperspec- tral image classification,

D. M. S. Arsa, G. Jati, A. J. Mantau, and I. Wasito, “Dimensionality reduction using deep belief network in big data case study: Hyperspec- tral image classification,” in 2016 International Workshop on Big Data and Information Security (IWBIS) , pp. 71–76, 2016

2016
[173]

Examining the deep belief network for subpixel unmixing with medium spatial resolution multispectral imagery in urban environments,

Y . Deng, R. Chen, and C. Wu, “Examining the deep belief network for subpixel unmixing with medium spatial resolution multispectral imagery in urban environments,” Remote Sensing , vol. 11, p. 1566, July 2019

2019
[174]

Deep belief networks for feature fusion in hyperspectral image classification,

M. Ghassemi, H. Ghassemian, and M. Imani, “Deep belief networks for feature fusion in hyperspectral image classification,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Aerospace Electronics and Remote Sensing Technology (ICARES), p. 1–6, IEEE, Sept. 2018

2018
[175]

A dbn based anomaly targets detector for hsi,

N. Ma, S. Wang, J. Yu, and Y . Peng, “A dbn based anomaly targets detector for hsi,” in Applied Optics and Photonics China , 2017

2017
[176]

Target detection of hyperspectral image based on convolutional neural networks,

X. Liu, C. Wang, Q. Sun, and M. Fu, “Target detection of hyperspectral image based on convolutional neural networks,” in 2018 37th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), pp. 9255–9260, 2018

2018
[177]

Hyperspectral image denoising and compression using optimized bidirectional gated recurrent unit,

D. Mohan, A. J, and S. Rajendran, “Hyperspectral image denoising and compression using optimized bidirectional gated recurrent unit,” Remote Sensing, vol. 16, no. 17, 2024

2024
[178]

Ayhan and C

B. Ayhan and C. Kwan, Application of Deep Belief Network to Land Cover Classification Using Hyperspectral Images , p. 269–276. Springer International Publishing, 2017

2017
[179]

Generative adversarial networks for hyperspectral image classification,

L. Zhu, Y . Chen, P. Ghamisi, and J. A. Benediktsson, “Generative adversarial networks for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 5046–5063, 2018

2018
[180]

Hyperspectral imaging combined with generative adversarial network (gan)-based data augmentation to identify haploid maize kernels,

L. Zhang, Q. Nie, H. Ji, Y . Wang, Y . Wei, and D. An, “Hyperspectral imaging combined with generative adversarial network (gan)-based data augmentation to identify haploid maize kernels,” Journal of food composition and analysis , vol. 106, p. 104346, 2022

2022
[181]

Features kept generative adversarial network data augmentation strategy for hyperspectral image classification,

M. Zhang, Z. Wang, X. Wang, M. Gong, Y . Wu, and H. Li, “Features kept generative adversarial network data augmentation strategy for hyperspectral image classification,” Pattern Recognition , vol. 142, p. 109701, Oct. 2023

2023
[182]

Hcgan-net: Classification of hsis using super pca based gabor filtering with gan,

M. V . Sireesha, P. V . Naganjaneyulu, and K. Babulu, “Hcgan-net: Classification of hsis using super pca based gabor filtering with gan,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Information System (ICDSIS), pp. 1–7, 2022

2022
[183]

Structure aware generative adversarial networks for hyperspectral image classification,

T. Alipour-Fard and H. Arefi, “Structure aware generative adversarial networks for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 13, 09 2020

2020
[184]

Spectral unmixing in generative space: 3d-gan based approach,

S. Suresh, A. P V , and A. Porwal, “Spectral unmixing in generative space: 3d-gan based approach,” in 2023 13th Workshop on Hyper- spectral Imaging and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS), pp. 1–6, 2023

2023
[185]

Hyperspectral nonlinear unmixing via generative adversarial network,

M. Tang, Y . Qu, and H. Qi, “Hyperspectral nonlinear unmixing via generative adversarial network,” in IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium , pp. 2404– 2407, 2020

2020
[186]

Hyperspectral anomaly detection based on variational background inference and gen- erative adversarial network,

Z. Wang, X. Wang, K. Tan, B. Han, J. Ding, and Z. Liu, “Hyperspectral anomaly detection based on variational background inference and gen- erative adversarial network,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 143, p. 109795, Nov. 2023

2023
[187]

Gan-based hyperspectral anomaly detection,

S. Arisoy, N. M. Nasrabadi, and K. Kayabol, “Gan-based hyperspectral anomaly detection,” in 2020 28th European Signal Processing Confer- ence (EUSIPCO), p. 1891–1895, IEEE, Jan. 2021

2020
[188]

Gan-based anomaly detection: A review,

X. Xia, X. Pan, N. Li, X. He, L. Ma, X. Zhang, and N. Ding, “Gan-based anomaly detection: A review,” Neurocomputing, vol. 493, p. 497–535, July 2022. BHATTI et. al.: AI-DRIVEN HSI: MULTIMODALITY , FUSION, CHALLENGES, AND THE DEEP LEARNING REVOLUTION 32

2022
[189]

Gan-based domain adaptation for object classification,

M. B. Bejiga and F. Melgani, “Gan-based domain adaptation for object classification,” in IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium , p. 1264–1267, IEEE, July 2018

2018
[190]

A latent encoder coupled generative adversarial network (le-gan) for efficient hyperspectral image super-resolution,

Y . Shi, L. Han, L. Han, S. Chang, T. Hu, and D. Dancey, “A latent encoder coupled generative adversarial network (le-gan) for efficient hyperspectral image super-resolution,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–19, 2022

2022
[191]

Physics-based gan with iterative refinement unit for hyperspectral and multispectral image fusion,

J. Xiao, J. Li, Q. Yuan, M. Jiang, and L. Zhang, “Physics-based gan with iterative refinement unit for hyperspectral and multispectral image fusion,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 14, pp. 6827–6841, 2021

2021
[192]

Remote sensing data fusion with generative adversarial networks: State-of-the-art methods and future research directions,

P. Liu, J. Li, L. Wang, and G. He, “Remote sensing data fusion with generative adversarial networks: State-of-the-art methods and future research directions,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine , vol. 10, p. 295–328, June 2022

2022
[193]

Hyperspectral image denoising via adversarial learning,

J. Zhang, Z. Cai, F. Chen, and D. Zeng, “Hyperspectral image denoising via adversarial learning,” Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 1790, 2022

2022
[194]

Few- shot hyperspectral image classification based on domain adaptation of class balance,

Q. Zhen, X. Zhang, Z. Li, B. Hou, X. Tang, L. Gao, and L. Jiao, “Few- shot hyperspectral image classification based on domain adaptation of class balance,” in IGARSS 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium , pp. 2255–2258, 2022

2022
[195]

Class-aligned and class-balancing generative domain adaptation for hyperspectral image classification,

J. Feng, Z. Zhou, R. Shang, J. Wu, T. Zhang, X. Zhang, and L. Jiao, “Class-aligned and class-balancing generative domain adaptation for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 62, pp. 1–17, 2024

2024
[196]

A gan- based domain adaptation method for glaucoma diagnosis,

Y . Sun, G. Yang, D. Ding, G. Cheng, J. Xu, and X. Li, “A gan- based domain adaptation method for glaucoma diagnosis,” in 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) , p. 1–8, IEEE, July 2020

2020
[197]

Generative attention adversarial classification network for unsupervised domain adaptation,

W. Chen and H. Hu, “Generative attention adversarial classification network for unsupervised domain adaptation,” Pattern Recognition , vol. 107, p. 107440, Nov. 2020

2020
[198]

Image anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks,

L. Deecke, R. Vandermeulen, L. Ruff, S. Mandt, and M. Kloft, “Image anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks,” in Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2018, Dublin, Ireland, September 10–14, 2018, Proceedings, Part...

2018
[199]

Reconstruction of hyperspectral images using generative adversarial networks,

J. Eek, “Reconstruction of hyperspectral images using generative adversarial networks,” master of science thesis in electrical engineering, Link¨oping University, SE-581 83 Link ¨oping, Sweden, 2021

2021
[200]

Generative adversarial networks (GANs),

D. Saxena and J. Cao, “Generative adversarial networks (GANs),” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 54, pp. 1–42, Apr. 2022

2022
[201]

Hyperspectral image classification using spectral-spatial lstms,

F. Zhou, R. Hang, Q. Liu, and X. Yuan, “Hyperspectral image classification using spectral-spatial lstms,” Neurocomputing, vol. 328, p. 39–47, Feb. 2019

2019
[202]

Pudikov and A

A. Pudikov and A. Brovko, Comparison of LSTM and GRU Recurrent Neural Network Architectures , p. 114–124. Springer International Publishing, Dec. 2020

2020
[203]

Hyperspectral image classification: An analysis employing cnn, lstm, transformer, and attention mechanism,

F. Viel, R. C. Maciel, L. O. Seman, C. A. Zeferino, E. A. Bezerra, and V . R. Q. Leithardt, “Hyperspectral image classification: An analysis employing cnn, lstm, transformer, and attention mechanism,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, p. 24835–24850, 2023

2023
[204]

Geometry-aware deep recurrent neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,

S. Hao, W. Wang, and M. Salzmann, “Geometry-aware deep recurrent neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transac- tions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 2448–2460, 2021

2021
[205]

Cascaded recurrent neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,

R. Hang, Q. Liu, D. Hong, and P. Ghamisi, “Cascaded recurrent neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 57, p. 5384–5394, Aug. 2019

2019
[206]

Hyperspectral image classification: An analysis employing cnn, lstm, transformer, and attention mechanism,

F. Viel, R. C. Maciel, L. O. Seman, C. A. Zeferino, E. A. Bezerra, and V . R. Q. Leithardt, “Hyperspectral image classification: An analysis employing cnn, lstm, transformer, and attention mechanism,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 24835–24850, 2023

2023
[207]

Learning spectral-spatial- temporal features via a recurrent convolutional neural network for change detection in multispectral imagery,

L. Mou, L. Bruzzone, and X. X. Zhu, “Learning spectral-spatial- temporal features via a recurrent convolutional neural network for change detection in multispectral imagery,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 57, pp. 924–935, Feb 2019. Manuscript receiv...

2019
[208]

Hyperspectral unmixing via recurrent neural network with chain classifier,

M. Lei, J. Li, L. Qi, Y . Wang, and X. Gao, “Hyperspectral unmixing via recurrent neural network with chain classifier,” in IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium , p. 2173–2176, IEEE, Sept. 2020

2020
[209]

Anomaly detection in aircraft data using recurrent neural networks (rnn),

A. Nanduri and L. Sherry, “Anomaly detection in aircraft data using recurrent neural networks (rnn),” in 2016 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance (ICNS) , pp. 5C2–1–5C2–8, IEEE, Apr. 2016

2016
[210]

Land cover classification via multitemporal spatial data by deep recurrent neural networks,

D. Ienco, R. Gaetano, C. Dupaquier, and P. Maurel, “Land cover classification via multitemporal spatial data by deep recurrent neural networks,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1685–1689, 2017

2017
[211]

Application of convolutional neural networks for automated land cover mapping using hyper spectral im- agery,

A. Ojha, R. Guputa, and G. Khan, “Application of convolutional neural networks for automated land cover mapping using hyper spectral im- agery,” in 2024 International Conference on Optimization Computing and Wireless Communication (ICOCWC) , pp. 1–5, 2024

2024
[212]

Land cover classification of hyperspectral imagery using deep neural networks,

S. Kakarla, “Land cover classification of hyperspectral imagery using deep neural networks,” Towards Data Science, December 2020. Hands- on Tutorials, Deep Learning. Published on Towards Data Science. Accesses on 27th Nov. 2024

2020
[213]

A deep relearning method based on the recurrent neural network for land cover classification,

Y . Tang, F. Qiu, B. Wang, D. Wu, L. Jing, and Z. Sun, “A deep relearning method based on the recurrent neural network for land cover classification,” GIScience & Remote Sensing , vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 1344– 1366, 2022

2022
[214]

Three- dimensional softmax mechanism guided bidirectional gru networks for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification,

G. Wu, X. Ning, L. Hou, F. He, H. Zhang, and A. Shankar, “Three- dimensional softmax mechanism guided bidirectional gru networks for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification,” Signal Processing, vol. 212, p. 109151, Nov. 2023

2023
[215]

Shorten spatial-spectral RNN with parallel-gru for hyperspec- tral image classification,

H. Luo, “Shorten spatial-spectral RNN with parallel-gru for hyperspec- tral image classification,” CoRR, vol. abs/1810.12563, 2018

2018 arXiv
[216]

Spectral-spatial classifi- cation for hyperspectral image based on a single gru,

E. Pan, X. Mei, Q. Wang, Y . Ma, and J. Ma, “Spectral-spatial classifi- cation for hyperspectral image based on a single gru,” Neurocomputing, vol. 387, p. 150–160, Apr. 2020

2020
[217]

Enhanced residual dense network joint with grus for multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion,

J. Xiao, Q. Yuan, J. Li, and H. Shen, “Enhanced residual dense network joint with grus for multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion,” in 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, pp. 2448–2451, 2021

2021
[218]

Bidirectional gru based autoencoder for dimensionality reduction in hyperspectral images,

S. Pande and B. Banerjee, “Bidirectional gru based autoencoder for dimensionality reduction in hyperspectral images,” in 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS , pp. 2731–2734, 2021

2021
[219]

Lstm based adaptive filtering for reduced prediction errors of hyperspectral images,

Z. Jiang, W. D. Pan, and H. Shen, “Lstm based adaptive filtering for reduced prediction errors of hyperspectral images,” in 2018 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless for Space and Extreme Environments (WiSEE), pp. 158–162, 2018

2018
[220]

Spatial–spectral feature extraction via deep convlstm neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,

W.-S. Hu, H.-C. Li, L. Pan, W. Li, R. Tao, and Q. Du, “Spatial–spectral feature extraction via deep convlstm neural networks for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 4237–4250, 2020

2020
[221]

Fast sequential feature extraction for recurrent neural network-based hyperspectral image classification,

A. Ma, A. M. Filippi, Z. Wang, Z. Yin, D. Huo, X. Li, and B. Guneralp, “Fast sequential feature extraction for recurrent neural network-based hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 59, p. 5920–5937, July 2021

2021
[222]

Lstm-adversarial autoen- coder for spectral feature learning in hyperspectral anomaly detection,

T. Ouyang, J. Wang, X. Zhao, and S. Wu, “Lstm-adversarial autoen- coder for spectral feature learning in hyperspectral anomaly detection,” in 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Sympo- sium IGARSS, pp. 2162–2165, 2021

2021
[223]

Vmd-inspired bidirectional lstm for anomaly detection of hyperspectral images,

Z. He, M. Xiao, D. He, A. Lou, and X. Li, “Vmd-inspired bidirectional lstm for anomaly detection of hyperspectral images,” in 2022 3rd International Conference on Geology, Mapping and Remote Sensing (ICGMRS), pp. 735–739, 2022

2022
[224]

Land use/land cover (lulc) classifi- cation using deep-lstm for hyperspectral images,

G. Tejasree and L. Agilandeeswari, “Land use/land cover (lulc) classifi- cation using deep-lstm for hyperspectral images,” The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences , vol. 27, p. 52–68, Mar. 2024

2024
[225]

Multitemporal relearning with convolutional lstm models for land use classification,

Y . Zhu, C. Geis, E. So, and Y . Jin, “Multitemporal relearning with convolutional lstm models for land use classification,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 14, p. 3251–3265, 2021

2021
[226]

Robust spectral based compression of hyperspectral images using lstm autoencoders,

K. Webster and J. Sheppard, “Robust spectral based compression of hyperspectral images using lstm autoencoders,” in 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) , pp. 01–08, 2022

2022
[227]

Sala-lstm: a novel high-precision maritime radar target detection method based on deep learning,

J. Wang and S. Li, “Sala-lstm: a novel high-precision maritime radar target detection method based on deep learning,” Scientific Reports , vol. 13, July 2023

2023
[228]

Dynamic fusion: Integrating cnn and lstm for hyperspectral unmixing,

A. K. K, T. M. Khatokar, C. A, G. Y , and V . S. S, “Dynamic fusion: Integrating cnn and lstm for hyperspectral unmixing,” in 2024 IEEE In- ternational Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), p. 1–5, IEEE, July 2024

2024
[229]

A critical review of rnn and lstm variants in hydrological time series predictions,

M. Waqas and U. W. Humphries, “A critical review of rnn and lstm variants in hydrological time series predictions,” MethodsX, vol. 13, p. 102946, 2024. BHATTI et. al.: AI-DRIVEN HSI: MULTIMODALITY , FUSION, CHALLENGES, AND THE DEEP LEARNING REVOLUTION 33

2024
[230]

A lightweight transformer network for hyperspectral image classification,

X. Zhang, Y . Su, L. Gao, L. Bruzzone, X. Gu, and Q. Tian, “A lightweight transformer network for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 61, pp. 1– 17, 2023

2023
[231]

Masked vision trans- formers for hyperspectral image classification,

L. Scheibenreif, M. Mommert, and D. Borth, “Masked vision trans- formers for hyperspectral image classification,” in 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pp. 2166–2176, 2023

2023
[232]

Hytas: A hyperspectral image transformer architecture search benchmark and analysis,

F. Zhou, M. Kilickaya, J. Vanschoren, and R. Piao, “Hytas: A hyperspectral image transformer architecture search benchmark and analysis,” 2024

2024
[233]

Double-branch feature fusion transformer for hyperspectral image classification,

L. Dang, L. Weng, Y . Hou, X. Zuo, and Y . Liu, “Double-branch feature fusion transformer for hyperspectral image classification,” Scientific Reports, vol. 13, Jan. 2023

2023
[234]

A dual-branch multiscale transformer network for hyperspectral image classification,

C. Shi, S. Yue, and L. Wang, “A dual-branch multiscale transformer network for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 62, pp. 1–20, 2024

2024
[235]

Essaformer: Efficient transformer for hyperspectral image super- resolution,

M. Zhang, C. Zhang, Q. Zhang, J. Guo, X. Gao, and J. Zhang, “Essaformer: Efficient transformer for hyperspectral image super- resolution,” in 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 23016–23027, 2023

2023
[236]

Hmft: Hyper- spectral and multispectral image fusion super-resolution method based on efficient transformer and spatial-spectral attention mechanism,

B. Qiao, B. Xu, Y . Xie, Y . Lin, Y . Liu, and X. Zuo, “Hmft: Hyper- spectral and multispectral image fusion super-resolution method based on efficient transformer and spatial-spectral attention mechanism,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience , vol. 2023, Jan. 2023

2023
[237]

Transformer for hyperspectral image classification based on multi-feature learning,

W. Zhang, Q. Wu, and Y . Chu, “Transformer for hyperspectral image classification based on multi-feature learning,” in Proceedings of the 2023 5th International Conference on Image, Video and Signal Pro- cessing, IVSP 2023, p. 59–64, ACM, Mar. 2023

2023
[238]

Hyperspectral image trans- former classification networks,

X. Yang, W. Cao, Y . Lu, and Y . Zhou, “Hyperspectral image trans- former classification networks,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, p. 1–15, 2022

2022
[239]

A hybrid convolution transformer for hyperspectral image classification,

T. Arshad, J. Zhang, and I. Ullah, “A hybrid convolution transformer for hyperspectral image classification,” European Journal of Remote Sensing, Mar. 2024

2024
[240]

Hider: A hyperspectral image denoising transformer with spatial–spectral constraints for hybrid noise removal,

H. Chen, G. Yang, and H. Zhang, “Hider: A hyperspectral image denoising transformer with spatial–spectral constraints for hybrid noise removal,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Sys- tems, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 8797–8811, 2024

2024
[241]

Spatial-spectral transformer for hyper- spectral image denoising,

M. Li, Y . Fu, and Y . Zhang, “Spatial-spectral transformer for hyper- spectral image denoising,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, p. 1368–1376, June 2023

2023
[242]

Three-dimension spatial–spectral attention transformer for hyperspectral image denoising,

Q. Zhang, Y . Dong, Y . Zheng, H. Yu, M. Song, L. Zhang, and Q. Yuan, “Three-dimension spatial–spectral attention transformer for hyperspectral image denoising,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 62, p. 1–13, 2024

2024
[243]

Hyper- spectral unmixing using transformer network,

P. Ghosh, S. K. Roy, B. Koirala, B. Rasti, and P. Scheunders, “Hyper- spectral unmixing using transformer network,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–16, 2022

2022
[244]

Coarse-to-fine sparse transformer for hyperspectral image reconstruction,

Y . Cai, J. Lin, X. Hu, H. Wang, X. Yuan, Y . Zhang, R. Timofte, and L. Van Gool, “Coarse-to-fine sparse transformer for hyperspectral image reconstruction,” in Computer Vision – ECCV 2022 (S. Avidan, G. Brostow, M. Ciss ´e, G. M. Farinella, and T. Hassner, eds.), (Cham), pp. ...

2022
[245]

Latent diffusion enhanced rectangle transformer for hyperspectral im- age restoration,

M. Li, Y . Fu, T. Zhang, J. Liu, D. Dou, C. Yan, and Y . Zhang, “Latent diffusion enhanced rectangle transformer for hyperspectral im- age restoration,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, p. 1–17, 2024

2024
[246]

Global and local attention-based transformer for hyperspectral image change detection,

Z. Wang, F. Gao, J. Dong, and Q. Du, “Global and local attention-based transformer for hyperspectral image change detection,” 2024

2024
[247]

Spectral–spatial–temporal transformers for hyperspectral im- age change detection,

Y . Wang, D. Hong, J. Sha, L. Gao, L. Liu, Y . Zhang, and X. Rong, “Spectral–spatial–temporal transformers for hyperspectral im- age change detection,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, p. 1–14, 2022

2022
[248]

Hyperspec- tral image denoising via spatial–spectral recurrent transformer,

G. Fu, F. Xiong, J. Lu, J. Zhou, J. Zhou, and Y . Qian, “Hyperspec- tral image denoising via spatial–spectral recurrent transformer,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 62, p. 1–14, 2024

2024
[249]

Siamese transformer network for hyperspectral image target detection,

W. Rao, L. Gao, Y . Qu, X. Sun, B. Zhang, and J. Chanussot, “Siamese transformer network for hyperspectral image target detection,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–19, 2022

2022
[250]

Coastline target detection based on uav hyperspectral remote sensing images,

S. Zhao, Y . Lv, X. Zhao, J. Wang, W. Li, and M. Lv, “Coastline target detection based on uav hyperspectral remote sensing images,” Frontiers in Marine Science , vol. 11, Oct. 2024

2024
[251]

Supervised spatial classification of multispectral lidar data in urban areas,

L.-Z. Huo, C. A. Silva, C. Klauberg, M. Mohan, L.-J. Zhao, P. Tang, and A. T. Hudak, “Supervised spatial classification of multispectral lidar data in urban areas,” PloS one , vol. 13, no. 10, p. e0206185, 2018

2018
[252]

Multimodal hyperspectral image classification via interconnected fusion,

L. Huo, J. Xia, L. Zhang, H. Zhang, and M. Xu, “Multimodal hyperspectral image classification via interconnected fusion,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.00495, 2023

2023 arXiv
[253]

Multi-source remote sensing data fusion: status and trends,

J. Zhang, “Multi-source remote sensing data fusion: status and trends,” International Journal of Image and Data Fusion , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5– 24, 2010

2010
[254]

Challenges and opportunities of multimodality and data fusion in remote sensing,

M. Dalla Mura, S. Prasad, F. Pacifici, P. Gamba, J. Chanussot, and J. A. Benediktsson, “Challenges and opportunities of multimodality and data fusion in remote sensing,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 1585–1601, 2015

2015
[255]

Multisensor data fusion: A review of the state-of-the-art,

B. Khaleghi, A. Khamis, F. O. Karray, and S. N. Razavi, “Multisensor data fusion: A review of the state-of-the-art,” Information fusion , vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 28–44, 2013

2013
[256]

A review of image fusion techniques for pan-sharpening of high-resolution satellite imagery,

F. D. Javan, F. Samadzadegan, S. Mehravar, A. Toosi, R. Khatami, and A. Stein, “A review of image fusion techniques for pan-sharpening of high-resolution satellite imagery,” ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing , vol. 171, pp. 101–117, 2021

2021
[257]

Pixel-level image fusion: A survey of the state of the art,

S. Li, X. Kang, L. Fang, J. Hu, and H. Yin, “Pixel-level image fusion: A survey of the state of the art,” information Fusion, vol. 33, pp. 100– 112, 2017

2017
[258]

Simultaneous image fusion and super- resolution using sparse representation,

H. Yin, S. Li, and L. Fang, “Simultaneous image fusion and super- resolution using sparse representation,” Information Fusion , vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 229–240, 2013

2013
[259]

A review on 3d reconstruction techniques from 2d images,

M. Aharchi and M. Ait Kbir, “A review on 3d reconstruction techniques from 2d images,” in Innovations in Smart Cities Applications Edition 3: The Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart City Applications 4, pp. 510–522, Springer, 2020

2020
[260]

Road network extraction in vhr sar images of urban and suburban areas by means of class-aided feature-level fusion,

K. Hedman, U. Stilla, G. Lisini, and P. Gamba, “Road network extraction in vhr sar images of urban and suburban areas by means of class-aided feature-level fusion,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1294–1296, 2009

2009
[261]

Classification of remote sensing optical and lidar data using extended attribute profiles,

M. Pedergnana, P. R. Marpu, M. Dalla Mura, J. A. Benediktsson, and L. Bruzzone, “Classification of remote sensing optical and lidar data using extended attribute profiles,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 856–865, 2012

2012
[262]

C. M. Bishop and N. M. Nasrabadi, Pattern recognition and machine learning, vol. 4. Springer, 2006

2006
[263]

Quality assessment of pan- sharpening methods in high-resolution satellite images using radio- metric and geometric index,

M. Hasanlou and M. R. Saradjian, “Quality assessment of pan- sharpening methods in high-resolution satellite images using radio- metric and geometric index,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences , vol. 9, pp. 1–10, 2016

2016
[264]

Object-based quality evaluation procedure for fused remote sensing imagery,

D. Rodr ´ıguez-Esparrag´on, J. Marcello, F. Eugenio, A. Garc ´ıa-Pedrero, and C. Gonzalo-Mart´ın, “Object-based quality evaluation procedure for fused remote sensing imagery,” Neurocomputing, vol. 255, pp. 40–51, 2017

2017
[265]

Region-and pixel-based image fusion for disaggregation of actual evapotranspiration,

F. Alidoost, M. A. Sharifi, and A. Stein, “Region-and pixel-based image fusion for disaggregation of actual evapotranspiration,” International Journal of Image and Data Fusion , vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 216–231, 2015

2015
[266]

A review of quality metrics for fused image,

P. Jagalingam and A. V . Hegde, “A review of quality metrics for fused image,” Aquatic Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 133–142, 2015

2015
[267]

Spatiotemporal image fusion in remote sensing,

M. Belgiu and A. Stein, “Spatiotemporal image fusion in remote sensing,” Remote sensing, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 818, 2019

2019
[268]

A review of remote sensing image fusion methods,

H. Ghassemian, “A review of remote sensing image fusion methods,” Information Fusion, vol. 32, pp. 75–89, 2016

2016
[269]

Context-driven fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images based on over- sampled multiresolution analysis,

B. Aiazzi, L. Alparone, S. Baronti, and A. Garzelli, “Context-driven fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images based on over- sampled multiresolution analysis,” IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing , vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2300–2312, 2002

2002
[270]

A critical comparison among pansharpening algorithms,

G. Vivone, L. Alparone, J. Chanussot, M. Dalla Mura, A. Garzelli, G. A. Licciardi, R. Restaino, and L. Wald, “A critical comparison among pansharpening algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 2565–2586, 2014

2014
[271]

Comparison between mallat’s and the ‘ `a trous’ discrete wavelet transform based algorithms for the fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images,

M. Gonz ´alez-Aud´ıcana, X. Otazu, O. Fors, and A. Seco, “Comparison between mallat’s and the ‘ `a trous’ discrete wavelet transform based algorithms for the fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images,” International Journal of Remote Sensing , vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 595–614, 2005

2005
[272]

V ogtnet: Variational optimization-guided two-stage network for multispectral and panchromatic image fusion,

P. Wang, Z. He, B. Huang, M. Dalla Mura, H. Leung, and J. Chanus- sot, “V ogtnet: Variational optimization-guided two-stage network for multispectral and panchromatic image fusion,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , 2024

2024
[273]

Survey of multispectral image fusion techniques in remote sensing applications,

D. Jiang, D. Zhuang, Y . Huang, and J. Fu, “Survey of multispectral image fusion techniques in remote sensing applications,” in Image fusion and its applications , vol. 1, pp. 1–22, IntechOpen, 2011. BHATTI et. al.: AI-DRIVEN HSI: MULTIMODALITY , FUSION, CHALLENGES, AND THE DE...

2011
[274]

Pixel-level image fusion using brovey transforme and wavelet transform,

R. A. Mandhare, P. Upadhyay, and S. Gupta, “Pixel-level image fusion using brovey transforme and wavelet transform,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 2690–2695, 2013

2013
[275]

A new look at ihs- like image fusion methods,

T.-M. Tu, S.-C. Su, H.-C. Shyu, and P. S. Huang, “A new look at ihs- like image fusion methods,” Information fusion, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 177– 186, 2001

2001
[276]

A fast intensity- hue-saturation fusion technique with spectral adjustment for ikonos imagery,

T.-M. Tu, P. S. Huang, C.-L. Hung, and C.-P. Chang, “A fast intensity- hue-saturation fusion technique with spectral adjustment for ikonos imagery,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote sensing letters , vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 309–312, 2004

2004
[277]

Best tradeoff for high-resolution image fusion to preserve spatial details and minimize color distortion,

T.-M. Tu, W.-C. Cheng, C.-P. Chang, P. S. Huang, and J.-C. Chang, “Best tradeoff for high-resolution image fusion to preserve spatial details and minimize color distortion,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 302–306, 2007

2007
[278]

An ihs and wavelet integrated approach to improve pan-sharpening visual quality of natural colour ikonos and quickbird images,

Y . Zhang and G. Hong, “An ihs and wavelet integrated approach to improve pan-sharpening visual quality of natural colour ikonos and quickbird images,” Information fusion, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 225–234, 2005

2005
[279]

A new intensity-hue-saturation fusion approach to image fusion with a tradeoff parameter,

M. Choi, “A new intensity-hue-saturation fusion approach to image fusion with a tradeoff parameter,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote sensing , vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1672–1682, 2006

2006
[280]

Improving component substitution pansharpening through multivariate regression of ms + pan data,

B. Aiazzi, S. Baronti, and M. Selva, “Improving component substitution pansharpening through multivariate regression of ms + pan data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 3230–3239, 2007

2007
[281]

An improved ihs fusion method for merging multi-spectral and panchromatic images considering sensor spectral response,

J. Xu, Z. Guan, and J. Liu, “An improved ihs fusion method for merging multi-spectral and panchromatic images considering sensor spectral response,” Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci , vol. 37, pp. 1169–1174, 2008

2008
[282]

Nonlinear ihs: A promising method for pan-sharpening,

M. Ghahremani and H. Ghassemian, “Nonlinear ihs: A promising method for pan-sharpening,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1606–1610, 2016

2016
[283]

Performance of evaluation methods in image fusion,

S. Klonus and M. Ehlers, “Performance of evaluation methods in image fusion,” in 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion , pp. 1409–1416, IEEE, 2009

2009
[284]

A comparative analysis of pansharpening techniques on quickbird and worldview-3 images,

Snehmani, A. Gore, A. Ganju, S. Kumar, P. Srivastava, and H. R. RP, “A comparative analysis of pansharpening techniques on quickbird and worldview-3 images,” Geocarto International , vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1268–1284, 2017

2017
[285]

Smoothing filter-based intensity modulation: A spectral pre- serve image fusion technique for improving spatial details,

J. Liu, “Smoothing filter-based intensity modulation: A spectral pre- serve image fusion technique for improving spatial details,” Interna- tional Journal of remote sensing, vol. 21, no. 18, pp. 3461–3472, 2000

2000
[286]

Liu’smoothing filter-based intensity modula- tion: A spectral preserve image fusion technique for improving spatial details’,

L. Wald and T. Ranchin, “Liu’smoothing filter-based intensity modula- tion: A spectral preserve image fusion technique for improving spatial details’,” International Journal of Remote Sensing , vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 593–597, 2002

2002
[287]

Pansharpening with matting model,

X. Kang, S. Li, and J. A. Benediktsson, “Pansharpening with matting model,” IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing , vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 5088–5099, 2013

2013
[288]

Optimal mmse pan sharp- ening of very high resolution multispectral images,

A. Garzelli, F. Nencini, and L. Capobianco, “Optimal mmse pan sharp- ening of very high resolution multispectral images,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 228–236, 2007

2007
[289]

Robust band-dependent spatial-detail approaches for panchromatic sharpening,

G. Vivone, “Robust band-dependent spatial-detail approaches for panchromatic sharpening,” IEEE transactions on Geoscience and Re- mote Sensing, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 6421–6433, 2019

2019
[290]

A new adaptive component-substitution- based satellite image fusion by using partial replacement,

J. Choi, K. Yu, and Y . Kim, “A new adaptive component-substitution- based satellite image fusion by using partial replacement,” IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 295– 309, 2010

2010
[291]

Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution and multispectral data- landsat tm and spot panchromatic,

P. Chavez, S. C. Sides, J. A. Anderson, et al. , “Comparison of three different methods to merge multiresolution and multispectral data- landsat tm and spot panchromatic,” Photogrammetric Engineering and remote sensing, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 295–303, 1991

1991
[292]

Indusion: Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images using the induction scaling technique,

M. M. Khan, J. Chanussot, L. Condat, and A. Montanvert, “Indusion: Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images using the induction scaling technique,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 98–102, 2008

2008
[293]

Worldview- 2 pan-sharpening,

C. Padwick, M. Deskevich, F. Pacifici, and S. Smallwood, “Worldview- 2 pan-sharpening,” in Proceedings of the ASPRS 2010 Annual Confer- ence, San Diego, CA, USA , vol. 2630, pp. 1–14, 2010

2010
[294]

Wavelet based image fusion techniques—an introduction, review and comparison,

K. Amolins, Y . Zhang, and P. Dare, “Wavelet based image fusion techniques—an introduction, review and comparison,” ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 249–263, 2007

2007
[295]

Improved additive- wavelet image fusion,

Y . Kim, C. Lee, D. Han, Y . Kim, and Y . Kim, “Improved additive- wavelet image fusion,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 263–267, 2010

2010
[296]

Multiscale contrast image fusion scheme with performance measures,

X. Zhang and J. Han, “Multiscale contrast image fusion scheme with performance measures,” Optica Applicata, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 453–461, 2004

2004
[297]

Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images based on morphological operators,

R. Restaino, G. Vivone, M. Dalla Mura, and J. Chanussot, “Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images based on morphological operators,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2882–2895, 2016

2016
[298]

Mtf- tailored multiscale fusion of high-resolution ms and pan imagery,

B. Aiazzi, L. Alparone, S. Baronti, A. Garzelli, and M. Selva, “Mtf- tailored multiscale fusion of high-resolution ms and pan imagery,” Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing , vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 591–596, 2006

2006
[299]

An mtf-based spectral distortion minimizing model for pan-sharpening of very high resolution multispectral images of urban areas,

B. Aiazzi, L. Alparone, S. Baronti, A. Garzelli, and M. Selva, “An mtf-based spectral distortion minimizing model for pan-sharpening of very high resolution multispectral images of urban areas,” in 2003 2nd GRSS/ISPRS Joint Workshop on Remote Sensing and Data Fusion over Urban...

2003
[300]

Fast and efficient panchromatic sharpening,

J. Lee and C. Lee, “Fast and efficient panchromatic sharpening,” IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 155– 163, 2009

2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Recent trends of hyperspectral imaging technology,

M. S. Lee, K. S. Kim, G. Min, D. H. Son, J. E. Kim, and S. Kim, “Recent trends of hyperspectral imaging technology,” Electronics and Telecommunications Trends, vol. 34, pp. 86–97, February 2019

2019

[2] [2]

A survey on computational spectral reconstruction methods from rgb to hyperspec- tral imaging,

J. Zhang, R. Su, Q. Fu, W. Ren, F. Heide, and Y . Nie, “A survey on computational spectral reconstruction methods from rgb to hyperspec- tral imaging,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, July 2022

2022

[3] [3]

Hyperspectral imagery applications for precision agriculture - a systemic survey,

P. K. Sethy, C. Pandey, Y . K. Sahu, and S. K. Behera, “Hyperspectral imagery applications for precision agriculture - a systemic survey,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 81, p. 3005–3038, Nov. 2021

2021

[4] [4]

Modern trends in hyperspectral image analysis: A review,

M. J. Khan, H. S. Khan, A. Yousaf, K. Khurshid, and A. Abbas, “Modern trends in hyperspectral image analysis: A review,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 14118–14129, 2018

2018

[5] [5]

Hyperspectral imaging and its applications: A review,

A. Bhargava, A. Sachdeva, K. Sharma, M. H. Alsharif, P. Uthansakul, and M. Uthansakul, “Hyperspectral imaging and its applications: A review,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 12, p. e33208, 2024

2024

[6] [6]

Multimodal hyperspectral remote sensing: An overview and perspective,

Y . Gu et al., “Multimodal hyperspectral remote sensing: An overview and perspective,” Science China Information Sciences , vol. 64, pp. 1– 24, 2021

2021

[7] [7]

Deep learning for hyperspectral image classification: A survey,

V . Kumar, R. S. Singh, M. Rambabu, and Y . Dua, “Deep learning for hyperspectral image classification: A survey,” Computer Science Review, vol. 53, p. 100658, Aug. 2024

2024

[8] [8]

A survey on hyperspectral image restoration: from the view of low-rank tensor approximation,

N. Liu, W. Li, Y . Wang, R. Tao, Q. Du, and J. Chanussot, “A survey on hyperspectral image restoration: from the view of low-rank tensor approximation,” Sci. China Inf. Sci. , vol. 66, Apr. 2023

2023