Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Resonances of compressible stars in precessing orbits around a spinning black hole

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A compressible star in a precessing orbit can hit the same tidal resonance as an incompressible one, for stiff equations of state.

desk verdict A plausible but oversold extension: the new polytropic resonance calculation actually forces a volume-preserving (incompressible) response, so the title's claim about compressible stars is only true for the background. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06998 v2 pith:HDANK5BC submitted 2025-02-10 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

Matteo Stockinger , Masaru Shibata This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords tidalresonancesaffinestarmodelpolytropicequationsofstateKerrblackholesprecessingorbitsr-modeswhitedwarfsdisruption
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Stable white dwarfs in slightly inclined spherical orbits around a spinning black hole can be driven into a resonance by the geodesic precession of their orbital plane, and this paper argues that the effect survives for compressible stars as long as their equation of state is not too soft. Working in the affine star model with polytropic equations of state, the paper shows that the first-order resonance found earlier for incompressible stars persists for stiff polytropes, moves closer to the black hole as the star gets softer, and gives a formula for how fast the resonant motion grows. For a 0.6 solar-mass, $10^{4}$ km white dwarf around a $10^{5}$ solar-mass Kerr black hole with a/m=0.8, the resonance sits near r/m≈8, outside the tidal disruption radius, and grows over roughly 10–100 orbits to the point where surface matter reaches escape velocity. If correct, some tidal disruption events would be preceded by resonant mass loss and a gravitational-wave signal that shuts off earlier than a point-mass inspiral predicts.

What carries the argument

The affine star model, which represents the star as a uniform linear deformation of a spherical reference state through a $3\times3$ matrix $b_{ia}$, together with the conformal correspondence theorem that rescales $b_{ia}$ and the orbital angular velocity by $\alpha=(b_1b_2b_3)^{1/3}$, thereby mapping a polytropic compressible star onto the same virial equations used for incompressible ellipsoids. The perturbative expansion in the inclination angle $\varepsilon=\theta-\pi/2$ separates the tidal forcing into the geodesic precession frequency $\omega_\theta$ and the star's normal modes; the resonance appears when a mode frequency, here an r-mode set by the Coriolis force and self-gravity, coincides with $\omega_\theta$. The growth rate is obtained by projecting the tidal source $C_\alpha$ onto the resonant eigenvector of the linear operator $M_{\alpha\beta}$ in Eq. (59), which also defines the normal modes of the star.

What would settle it

Run a general-relativistic hydrodynamics simulation of a $0.6\,M_\odot$, $10^4$ km white dwarf modeled as a $\Gamma=5/3$ polytrope on a slightly inclined spherical orbit at $r/m\approx8$ around a $10^5\,M_\odot$ Kerr black hole with $a/m=0.8$: the r-mode should grow with the rate from Eq. (63) over 10–100 orbits and reach surface velocities of order the escape speed; if no such growth appears, the resonance is an artifact of the affine model's closure assumptions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that the tidal resonance identified for incompressible stars is not an artifact of incompressibility: a compressible polytropic star in a slightly inclined spherical orbit around a Kerr black hole undergoes the same first-order r-mode resonance, driven by the off-diagonal gravitoelectric component of the tidal tensor coupling to the Coriolis force, provided the polytropic index satisfies $n \lesssim 2$ (adiabatic index $\Gamma \gtrsim 3/2$). The second-order resonance, however, disappears for $n=2$ ($\Gamma=3/2$). The resonance condition, Eq. (57), and the growth-rate formula, Eq. (63), are derived analytically by expanding the affine-model equations to first and second order in the inclination angle and closing them with an adiabatic pressure relation; the growth-rate formula is checked against numerical integration of the linearized equations in Fig. 5. The same formalism also yields the zero-order Roche limit for each polytrope, and the paper shows that the first-order resonance can be reached before that limit for white dwarfs of typical compactness.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation keeps the scale factor $\alpha=(b_1b_2b_3)^{1/3}$ fixed at its equilibrium value during the perturbation; if first-order volume changes feed back through $\alpha$, the normal-mode frequencies and the resonance condition derived from them would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For stiff polytropic white dwarfs ($n=1$ to $3/2$), the first-order resonance occurs at a larger $r/m$ than for incompressible stars and can still lie outside the Roche limit, so it can act before tidal disruption.
  • A $0.6\,M_\odot$, $10^4$ km white dwarf around a $10^5\,M_\odot$ Kerr black hole with $a/m=0.8$ enters the resonance near $r/m\approx8$, where the predicted growth over 10–100 orbits drives surface velocities toward the escape speed, suggesting mass ejection and eventual disruption.
  • The gravitational-wave signal from such an inspiral would terminate at an orbital frequency slightly below the value expected from tidal disruption alone, because resonant mass ejection reduces the star's compactness beforehand.
  • For polytropic index $n=2$ ($\Gamma=3/2$), the second-order resonance no longer exists, so only the first-order resonance matters for softer stars, and it is triggered closer to the black hole.
  • The same perturbative framework suggests that weakly eccentric, precessing orbits, as expected from three-body interactions or tidal capture events, would also show these resonances for not-too-soft equations of state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit: if the resonance grows as predicted, the ejected mass carries away orbital angular momentum and changes the inspiral rate, which would advance or delay the gravitational-wave phase relative to a point-particle inspiral and could be measurable with a space-based detector.
  • A testable extension beyond the paper's formalism is to allow $\alpha=(b_1b_2b_3)^{1/3}$ to respond to the first-order volume change instead of being fixed; this would directly show whether the resonance distance shifts significantly for soft equations of state.
  • The same resonance mechanism should operate for any star in an inclined, precessing orbit around a compact spinning primary—including neutron stars in extreme-mass-ratio inspirals—where the polytropic index and spin set the resonant radius; the growth-rate formula derived here is a natural tool for those cases.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends a previously reported tidal resonance for incompressible stars in slightly inclined spherical orbits around a Kerr black hole to stars with polytropic equations of state. Using the affine star model and the Carter-Luminet conformal correspondence, the authors derive a first-order resonance condition and a growth-rate formula, apply these to white dwarfs around a 10^5 solar-mass black hole, and find that the first-order resonance survives for relatively stiff equations of state while the second-order resonance disappears for polytropic index n=2. They also estimate the number of orbits needed for the resonance to affect the star and discuss possible gravitational-wave and electromagnetic signatures.

Significance. If the result holds, it identifies a new astrophysical channel for tidal resonances before disruption in white-dwarf/black-hole systems, with potentially observable consequences for LISA-band sources. The paper is largely self-contained, presents an explicit analytical growth-rate formula, and checks it against a numerical integration of the same linear ODE in Fig. 5. The use of the conformal correspondence to translate polytropic backgrounds into the incompressible framework is elegant and useful. However, the central claim that the resonances occur for genuinely compressible stars is undermined by the assumption that the scale factor alpha is held fixed during the perturbation, which effectively reduces the perturbed dynamics to the incompressible case.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III A, Eqs. (41), (49), and (54)] The assumption that alpha stays constant and equal to (b1 b2 b3)^{1/3}, together with the definition of alpha in Eq. (41), forces the first-order perturbation to be volume-preserving: tr(\hat b0^{-1} \hat beta) = 0, which is exactly Eq. (54). Combining this with Eq. (52) gives delta P = 0 and, from Eq. (53), delta Pi = 0. The perturbed star therefore obeys the same divergence-free equations as in the incompressible case, and the polytropic index enters only through the equilibrium background. This contradicts the text in the same section, which states that 'contrary to the incompressible case, we cannot assume that the star has a fixed volume.' The paper gives no estimate of the error arising from dropping the delta-alpha terms that would appear if the volume were allowed to change. Consequently, the central claim that the resonance is extended to compressible stars is not actually demonstrated; what is shown is an incompressible-mode calculation on a polytropic background.
  2. [Sec. III C] The second-order resonance condition is never displayed. The text describes that one should recast the equations in matrix form and find where the determinant vanishes, but neither the matrix, the determinant condition, nor the resulting resonant-distance equation is given. Since the disappearance of the second-order resonance for n=2 is a quantitative claim shown only in Fig. 2, the derivation is not verifiable from the manuscript as written.
  3. [Sec. III B, Eqs. (57), (61), and (63)] The resonance is identified as an r-mode driven by the Coriolis force, but the eigenvector rho_alpha of Eq. (61) is not computed or displayed. Given the alpha-constant closure, one cannot verify that the resonant mode has vanishing divergence and vanishing pressure perturbation, nor compare its frequency with known r-mode frequencies of compressible polytropes. Without such a check, the claim that the resonance mechanism is genuinely the same in compressible stars remains an assertion rather than a demonstrated result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract says 'We give further credence to the result previously given,' which is vague; the introduction's phrasing 'previously found' is clearer. The sentence should be reworded to state what new evidence is provided.
  2. [Fig. 5 caption] The text says delta is approximately -7.2 and 'close to 7'; it should say 'close to -7' to avoid a sign ambiguity.
  3. [Sec. II C] The statement that the formalism cannot be extended to Gamma = 4/3 is mentioned in passing but never discussed; since the paper considers Gamma = 2, 5/3, and 3/2, a brief comment on the physical meaning of the Gamma = 4/3 exclusion would be helpful.
  4. [Sec. IV A, Fig. 4] The figure uses epsilon_0 = 0.5, which is not a small inclination angle; the linear perturbation expansion in epsilon may therefore be quantitatively unreliable at this amplitude. The authors should state more carefully that this value is chosen for illustration and that the linear prediction is only indicative.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The α-constant assumption makes the perturbed dynamics volume-preserving, so the 'compressible-star' resonance is the incompressible r-mode on a polytropic background; the central claim reduces to this input.

  1. self definitional [Sec. III A, around Eqs. (48)-(49); admission in Sec. III B after Eq. (56)]
    "To facilitate the subsequent computations, we assume that α stays constant and equal to (b1b2b3)1/3. Thus, we have at first order ``` ``` ``` ```"

    α=(b1b2b3)^{1/3} is the cube root of the deformation determinant, so "α stays constant" forces tr(b0^{-1}β)=0: the first-order density change vanishes and, via Eqs. (51)-(52), δP=0. The paper then states (Sec. III B) that the off-diagonal perturbation equations giving the r-mode resonance "are the same as the ones for the incompressible model." Thus the claimed compressible-star resonance is the incompressible linear response on a polytropic background; the polytropic index changes only the equilibrium shape, Roche limit, α, and τ*, not the perturbed compressible dynamics. A genuine compressible mode would have nonvanishing divergence and modified frequencies in Eqs. (57) and (63). The central claim therefore reduces by construction to the α-constant input.

full rationale

The only substantive circularity is the α-constant assumption: since α=(b1b2b3)^{1/3}, fixing α during the perturbation fixes the first-order volume (and hence density) perturbation to zero, and the paper itself notes that the off-diagonal equations that produce the resonance are the same as in the incompressible model. Thus the existence of the resonance in 'compressible' stars is not a new dynamical result; it is the incompressible r-mode of the previous paper [20] evaluated on a polytropic equilibrium. The polytropic background calculation (Lane-Emden solution, conformal rescaling, Roche limit, resonant-distance shifts) is independent and not circular. Citations of [20] and of Carter-Luminet are continuity statements, not load-bearing uniqueness claims; no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and Fig. 5 is an internal consistency check of Eq. (58) against Eq. (63). The score of 6 reflects that one central 'prediction'—the persistence of the resonance—reduces by construction to the volume-preserving input, while the EOS-dependent background content remains substantive.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on the affine model, polytropic equation of state, Newtonian self-gravity, zero-vorticity condition, constant alpha during perturbation, adiabatic closure, and fixed geodesic orbit. None of these are fitted to the target result; they are modeling choices. The only numbers fitted to computed data are epsilon_0 = 0.5 and the power-law exponent delta = -7.2, which are illustrative rather than load-bearing.

free parameters (2)
  • epsilon_0 = 0.5
    Inclination perturbation amplitude assumed for Figs. 4 and 5; not fitted to data but chosen to illustrate the response.
  • delta = -7.2
    Power-law exponent fitted to the numerical growth rate of dJ13/dt at large separation in Fig. 5; not used in the resonance condition.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Affine model: the star's deformation is a spatially uniform linear map r_i = q_ia rhat_a (Eq. 1).
    This restricts the star to ellipsoidal configurations and ignores higher-order deformation terms in the Taylor expansion (Eq. 2).
  • domain assumption Polytropic equation of state P = kappa rho^(1+1/n).
    The central claim is stated for polytropic equations of state with n=1, 3/2, 2; results may not carry over to other equations of state.
  • domain assumption Newtonian self-gravity for the star; general relativistic self-gravity neglected.
    Section II A estimates the error as order G m_star/(c^2 R_star), small for white dwarfs.
  • domain assumption Corotating star with zero vorticity, lambda_ab = 0.
    Section II C; the analysis does not cover differentially rotating or non-corotating stars.
  • ad hoc to paper Scale factor alpha remains constant during the perturbation.
    Sec. III A states this explicitly to facilitate computation; it suppresses feedback from first-order volume changes on the mode frequencies.
  • domain assumption Adiabatic pressure-density relation delta P/P = Gamma delta rho/rho.
    Used in Sec. III A to close the compressible system and to compute delta Pi in Eq. (53).
  • domain assumption Geodesic orbit fixed; tidal back-reaction on the orbit is neglected.
    Section II C justifies this with the small mass ratio m_star/m about 1e-5, but resonant growth over 10-100 orbits could accumulate secular orbital changes.
  • standard math Carter-Luminet conformal correspondence theorem.
    Theorem from the cited Carter-Luminet paper used in Sec. II C to map compressible affine equations onto incompressible virial equations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resonances of compressible stars in precessing orbits around a spinning black hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HDANK5BC

@misc{pith2026250206998,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resonances of compressible stars in precessing orbits around a spinning black hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HDANK5BC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06998}
}
read the original abstract

In our previous paper, we reported the presence of a new resonance of an incompressible star orbiting a spinning black hole and showed that it can set in before the tidal disruption limit if the star has an inclined spherical orbit around the black hole. Using the affine model developed by Carter and Luminet, we extend our result to the stars with polytropic equations of state. We give further credence to the result previously given. We also derive the formula for the growth rate of the resonant motion, which is useful for checking the results of hydrodynamics simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06998 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. for the soft EOSs with Γ = 5/3, and 3/2. We note that for higher angular velocity, i.e., when entering the gray zone, there is no solution. This gives us the Roche limit for different EOSs. As we already noted, the max￾imum angular velocity in terms of Ω increases for softer ¯ EOSs. Indeed as the EOS gets softer, the core of the star gets more compact, and hence, the star becomes less susceptible to tidal disruption… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. We plot the resonant distance for low density WD [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The maximum velocity at the surface of the star due [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Two estimates of the growth rate of the angular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Observable signature of magnetic tidal coupling in hierarchical triple systems

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Magnetic tidal fields from a supermassive black hole trigger new orbital resonances in a companion compact binary, boosting eccentricity and altering its gravitational-wave signal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    G. I. Ogilvie, Tidal Dissipation in Stars and Giant Plan- ets, ARA&A 52, 171 (2014), arXiv:1406.2207 [astro- ph.SR]. 14

    arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    Gezari, Tidal Disruption Events, ARA&A 59, 21 (2021), arXiv:2104.14580 [astro-ph.HE]

    S. Gezari, Tidal Disruption Events, ARA&A 59, 21 (2021), arXiv:2104.14580 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Souchay, S

    J. Souchay, S. Mathis, and T. Tokieda, Tides in Astron- omy and Astrophysics , Vol. 861 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    D. E. Cartwright, Tides : a scientific history (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Deparis, H

    V. Deparis, H. Legros, and J. Souchay, Investigations of Tides from the Antiquity to Laplace, in Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag , Vol. 861, edited by J. Souchay, S. Mathis, and T. Tokieda (2013) p. 31

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Bodenheimer, D

    P. Bodenheimer, D. N. C. Lin, and R. A. Mardling, On the Tidal Inflation of Short-Period Extrasolar Planets, ApJ 548, 466 (2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Ibgui and A

    L. Ibgui and A. Burrows, Coupled Evolution with Tides of the Radius and Orbit of Transiting Giant Planets: General Results, ApJ 700, 1921 (2009), arXiv:0902.3998 [astro-ph.EP]

    arXiv 2009

  8. [8]

    C. S. Kochanek, Coalescing Binary Neutron Stars, ApJ 398, 234 (1992)

    work page 1992

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Bildsten and C

    L. Bildsten and C. Cutler, Tidal Interactions of Inspiral- ing Compact Binaries, ApJ 400, 175 (1992)

    1992

  2. [10]

    D. Lai, F. A. Rasio, and S. L. Shapiro, Hydrodynamic Instability and Coalescence of Close Binary Systems, ApJ 406, L63 (1993)

    1993

  3. [11]

    D. Lai, F. A. Rasio, and S. L. Shapiro, Hydrodynamic Instability and Coalescence of Binary Neutron Stars, ApJ 420, 811 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9304027 [astro-ph]

    1994 arXiv

  4. [12]

    ´E. ´E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Constraining neutron- star tidal Love numbers with gravitational-wave detec- tors, Phys. Rev. D 77, 021502 (2008), arXiv:0709.1915 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  5. [13]

    L. G. Fishbone, The Relativistic Roche Problem, ApJ 175, L155 (1972)

    1972

  6. [14]

    L. G. Fishbone, The relativistic Roche problem. II. Sta- bility theory., ApJ 195, 499 (1975)

    1975

  7. [15]

    M. Shibata, Relativistic Roche-Riemann Problems around a Black Hole, Progress of Theoretical Physics 96, 917 (1996), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/96/5/917/5226638/96-5-917.pdf

    1996

  8. [16]

    Wiggins and D

    P. Wiggins and D. Lai, Tidal Interaction between a Fluid Star and a Kerr Black Hole in Circular Orbit, ApJ 532, 530 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9907365 [astro-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Ishii, M

    M. Ishii, M. Shibata, and Y. Mino, Black hole tidal prob- lem in the Fermi normal coordinates, Phys. Rev. D 71, 044017 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0501084

    2005 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Banerjee, S

    P. Banerjee, S. Paul, R. Shaikh, and T. Sarkar, Tidal effects away from the equatorial plane in Kerr backgrounds, Physics Letters B 795, 29 (2019), arXiv:1812.08642 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Chandrasekhar, Ellipsoidal figures of equilibrium (1969)

    S. Chandrasekhar, Ellipsoidal figures of equilibrium (1969)

    1969

  12. [20]

    Stockinger and M

    M. Stockinger and M. Shibata, Relativistic Roche prob- lem for stars in precessing orbits around a spinning black hole, Phys. Rev. D 110, 043038 (2024), arXiv:2403.06834 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Shibata, Effects of tidal resonances in coalescing com- pact binary systems, Prog

    M. Shibata, Effects of tidal resonances in coalescing com- pact binary systems, Prog. Theor. Phys. 91, 871 (1994)

    1994

  14. [22]

    Lai, Resonant Oscillations and Tidal Heating in Coa- lescing Binary Neutron Stars, MNRAS 270, 611 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9404062 [astro-ph]

    D. Lai, Resonant Oscillations and Tidal Heating in Coa- lescing Binary Neutron Stars, MNRAS 270, 611 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9404062 [astro-ph]

    1994 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Reisenegger and P

    A. Reisenegger and P. Goldreich, Excitation of Neutron Star Normal Modes during Binary Inspiral, ApJ 426, 688 (1994)

    1994

  16. [24]

    K. D. Kokkotas and G. Schafer, Tidal and tidal-resonant effects in coalescing binaries, MNRAS 275, 301 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9502034 [gr-qc]

    1995 arXiv

  17. [25]

    ´E. ´E. Flanagan and ´E. Racine, Gravitomagnetic reso- nant excitation of Rossby modes in coalescing neutron star binaries, Phys. Rev. D 75, 044001 (2007), arXiv:gr- qc/0601029 [gr-qc]

    2007

  18. [26]

    Xu and D

    W. Xu and D. Lai, Resonant tidal excitation of oscilla- tion modes in merging binary neutron stars: Inertial- gravity modes, Phys. Rev. D 96, 083005 (2017), arXiv:1708.01839 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Poisson, Gravitomagnetic tidal resonance in neutron- star binary inspirals, Phys

    E. Poisson, Gravitomagnetic tidal resonance in neutron- star binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 101, 104028 (2020), arXiv:2003.10427 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Astoul and A

    A. Astoul and A. J. Barker, Do nonlinear effects disrupt tidal dissipation predictions in convective en- velopes?, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2310.05980 (2023), arXiv:2310.05980 [astro-ph.SR]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    H. Yu, P. Arras, and N. N. Weinberg, Dynamical tides during the inspiral of rapidly spinning neutron stars: Solutions beyond mode resonance, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024039 (2024), arXiv:2404.00147 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Carter and J

    B. Carter and J. P. Luminet, Mechanics of the affine star model, MNRAS 212, 23 (1985)

    1985

  23. [31]

    Carter and J

    B. Carter and J. P. Luminet, Tidal compression of a star by a large black hole. I Mechanical evolution and nuclear energy release by proton capture, A&A 121, 97 (1983)

    1983

  24. [32]

    J. P. Luminet and J. A. Marck, Tidal squeezing of stars by Schwarzschild black holes, MNRAS 212, 57 (1985)

    1985

  25. [33]

    J. P. Luminet and B. Carter, Dynamics of an Affine Star Model in a Black Hole Tidal Field, ApJS 61, 219 (1986)

    1986

  26. [34]

    Chandrasekhar, An introduction to the study of stellar structure (1939)

    S. Chandrasekhar, An introduction to the study of stellar structure (1939)

    1939

  27. [35]

    J. A. Marck, Solution to the Equations of Parallel Trans- port in Kerr Geometry; Tidal Tensor, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 385, 431 (1983)

    1983

  28. [36]

    E. N. Parker, Tensor Virial Equations, Physical Review 96, 1686 (1954)

    1954

  29. [37]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, Black holes, white dwarfs and neutron stars. The physics of compact objects (1983)

    1983

  30. [38]

    Amaro-Seoane, H

    P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Ba- rausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bor- toluzzi, J. Camp, C. Caprini, V. Cardoso, M. Colpi, J. Conklin, N. Cornish, C. Cutler, K. Danzmann, R. Dolesi, L. Ferraioli, V. Ferroni, E. Fitzsimons, J. Gair, L....

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Tejeda, E

    E. Tejeda, E. Gafton, S. Rosswog, and J. C. Miller, 15 Tidal disruptions by rotating black holes: relativistic hy- drodynamics with Newtonian codes, MNRAS 469, 4483 (2017), arXiv:1701.00303 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Gafton and S

    E. Gafton and S. Rosswog, Tidal disruptions by rotating black holes: effects of spin and impact parameter, MN- RAS 487, 4790 (2019), arXiv:1903.09147 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Maguire, M

    K. Maguire, M. Eracleous, P. G. Jonker, M. MacLeod, and S. Rosswog, Tidal Disruptions of White Dwarfs: Theoretical Models and Observational Prospects, Space Sci. Rev. 216, 39 (2020), arXiv:2004.00146 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Carter, Global Structure of the Kerr Family of Grav- itational Fields, Physical Review 174, 1559 (1968)

    B. Carter, Global Structure of the Kerr Family of Grav- itational Fields, Physical Review 174, 1559 (1968)

    1968

  35. [43]

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press, and S. A. Teukolsky, Ro- tating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, and Scalar Synchrotron Radiation, ApJ 178, 347 (1972)

    1972

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.