Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 6 cited by

Magnetic tidal fields from a supermassive black hole trigger new orbital resonances in a companion compact binary, boosting eccentricity and altering its gravitational-wave signal.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 07:37 UTC pith:MI2QMM3O

load-bearing objection Honest, internally consistent extension of the group's electric-tide resonance work to the 0.5PN magnetic term; the new resonances are real, but Eq. (5.13) has a printed error and App. A's CoM decoupling is asserted, not proved. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.24897 v3 pith:MI2QMM3O submitted 2025-10-28 gr-qc astro-ph.GAhep-th

Observable signature of magnetic tidal coupling in hierarchical triple systems

Marta Cocco , Gianluca Grignani , Troels Harmark , Marta Orselli , Davide Panella , Daniele Pica This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.GAhep-th
keywords magnetictidalbinarycouplingdynamicseccentricityhierarchicalobservable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a hierarchical triple system: a small binary of two compact objects (stars or black holes) orbits a supermassive black hole. In Newtonian gravity, the outer black hole exerts familiar 'electric' tidal forces on the inner binary, which can shake its orbit. General relativity also predicts a purely relativistic 'magnetic' tidal force, which has no Newtonian counterpart and depends on the velocities of the bodies. The authors add this magnetic tidal interaction at the leading quadrupole order, a 0.5 post-Newtonian correction.

They show that this magnetic coupling creates new resonances: when the inner binary's periastron precession frequency matches certain combinations of the outer orbit's radial and frame-precession frequencies, the inner orbit's eccentricity jumps. These jumps appear in addition to the previously known electric-tide resonances. The authors integrate the Lagrange Planetary Equations numerically and reproduce the predicted jumps, confirming the analytical resonance conditions. They find the effect is strongest for inclined or aligned orbits and grows with the outer orbit's eccentricity.

The authors argue that these eccentricity jumps would leave phase shifts in the gravitational waves emitted by the inner binary, within LISA's frequency band, and that the extra eccentricity slightly accelerates the merger. However, the analytic resonance model is derived for nearly circular outer orbits, and the LISA detectability is asserted qualitatively rather than through a signal-to-noise calculation.

Core claim

The paper's core assertion is that 'magnetic tides introduce new resonances absent at lower order, leading to additional eccentricity excitations and significantly modifying the binary's long-term evolution' (Abstract). Concretely, the 0.5PN magnetic tidal coupling yields precession resonances at ˙γ = −Ω_r + Ω_Ψ, Ω_Ψ, and Ω_r + Ω_Ψ (Eq. 5.12), which are not present for the 0PN electric tides alone, and which produce eccentricity jumps visible in the numerical LPE solutions.

Load-bearing premise

The decoupling of the inner binary's center-of-mass from its relative motion at 0.5PN order. The paper asserts, without solving the system (A.9), that the accelerated-frame corrections to Marck's tetrad are of quadrupolar order and therefore negligible (App. A, Eq. A.4–A.9, text after Eq. A.9). If those corrections contributed at the same order as the magnetic tidal coupling, the Hamiltonian (2.18) would omit 0.5PN terms that could shift or suppress the predicted resonances.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies hierarchical triples consisting of a compact binary orbiting a supermassive black hole, and extends earlier work on precession resonances from 0PN electric tidal fields to 0.5PN magnetic tidal fields. The main claim is that the magnetic quadrupole tidal coupling, which is linear in the outer orbital angular momentum and has odd parity, produces precession resonances with q=1 in the condition \dot\gamma = k\Omega_{\hat r}+l\Omega_{\hat\Psi}. At leading order in the outer eccentricity, three resonances are predicted: \dot\gamma = -\Omega_{\hat r}+\Omega_{\hat\Psi}, \Omega_{\hat\Psi}, and \Omega_{\hat r}+\Omega_{\hat\Psi}. The authors derive the orbit-averaged 0.5PN magnetic Hamiltonian, compute the relevant Fourier coefficients, and verify the resonance crossings numerically through Lagrange Planetary Equations supplemented by Peters-type radiation reaction. They argue that these resonances produce additional eccentricity jumps, accelerate merger, and leave signatures in the LISA band.

Significance. If the derivation is sound, this is a genuinely new strong-gravity effect: it identifies a concrete observable consequence of purely relativistic magnetic tidal fields in a hierarchical triple, with no Newtonian analogue. The core mechanism is elegant and parameter-free in the technical sense that no parameters are fitted to the phenomenology: the q=1 structure follows from the odd parity of the magnetic tidal tensor, and the resonance locations are fixed by the frequencies of the outer geodesic. The paper also provides explicit analytical amplitudes and numerical confirmation of the resonance crossings, which strengthens the main claim. The main risk is not internal inconsistency of the orbit-averaged calculation itself, but the unproved decoupling of center-of-mass and relative motion at 0.5PN order, on which the central Hamiltonian (2.18) rests. That issue, together with a clear algebraic error in the printed resonant Hamiltonian (5.13), prevents acceptance in the present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Eqs. (A.4)-(A.9); central Hamiltonian (2.18)] The derivation of the 0.5PN magnetic Hamiltonian (2.18) requires that, after using the accelerated frame defined by Eq. (A.4), the corrections to Marck's tetrad do not contribute at quadrupolar order. The paper states this result is verified 'without explicitly solving the system (A.9)' and under the assumption that \hat r is approximately constant. This is not a derivation. The magnetic resonances in Eq. (5.12) are themselves 0.5PN quadrupolar-order effects; any tetrad correction of the same order can modify the Fourier coefficients (5.11), shift the resonance amplitudes, or introduce new Fourier modes. The numerical LPE calculation uses the same truncated Hamiltonian (4.22), so it cannot validate this truncation. The authors should either solve Eq. (A.9) to the required order, or provide an explicit order-by-order argument that the induced corrections to E_{ij} and B_{ij} in Eq. (2.1)
  2. [Sec. V.B, Eq. (5.13)] Equation (5.13) as printed contains the factor \cos^2 I/[2(1-2\cos I)], which diverges at I=\pi/3, is nonzero at I=\pi, and is negative for I<\pi/3. This contradicts the immediately following text, which states that resonances vanish at both I=\pi/3 and I=\pi, and it is inconsistent with the numerical suppression seen at I=60^\circ in Fig. 3. The correct inclination factor follows from Eq. (5.6) with m_{k,l}=n_{k,l} and vanishing tilde coefficients: it should be proportional to \cos I+\cos 2I=(1+\cos I)(2\cos I-1), which vanishes at both angles. This is not a cosmetic typo: Eq. (5.13) is the principal analytic prediction for the amplitude of the new magnetic resonances, and the printed expression also gives the wrong normalization at aligned inclinations. The numerical LPE solutions do not rely on Eq. (5.13), but the analytical model presented in Sec. V.B needs correction.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. V.B / Table I] The abstract and introduction state that magnetic tides introduce 'new resonances absent at lower order.' This is overstated: Table I shows that the \dot\gamma=\Omega_{\hat\Psi} resonance already appears in the 0PN electric-tidal column. What is new at 0.5PN are the (-1,1) and (1,1) resonances, while the (0,1) resonance receives an additional magnetic contribution. The wording should be adjusted to avoid claiming that all three magnetic resonances are absent at lower order.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. VI] The text describes the numerical computation as 'without performing a Fourier expansion of the Hamiltonian' and as solving the 'full equations of motion.' In practice, the LPE system (6.3) is evolved with the orbit-averaged Hamiltonian (4.22), not with the unaveraged two-body equations. Please rephrase to avoid overstating the independence of the numerical check.
  2. [Abstract, Sec. VII] The title and abstract claim an 'observable signature' and 'potential LISA detectability,' but no waveform or SNR estimate is provided; Sec. VII leaves waveform construction to future work. This is acceptable as a forward-looking statement, but the wording should be qualified, e.g., 'a GW signature that could be observable' rather than a demonstrated detection.
  3. [Throughout] The notation '0.5PN order' is nonstandard; since the term is 1/c beyond Newtonian, a parenthetical definition at first occurrence would help readers not working in the PN convention.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the magnetic-tide resonances are derived from an explicit 0.5PN tidal Hamiltonian and are not fitted to the claimed outputs.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The 0.5PN magnetic tidal coupling enters through the Lagrangian (2.3) and Hamiltonian (2.18), and the resonance condition (5.7) follows from Fourier decomposing B_ij in (5.2)-(5.3) together with the orbit-averaged magnetic Hamiltonian (4.15)-(4.16); the q=1 structure is a consequence of the explicit tensor T_ij in (4.14), not an assumption that the resonances exist. The quasi-circular Fourier coefficients (5.11) are computed from the geodesic solutions (5.8), and the resonance list (5.12) is a direct consequence. No parameter is fitted to the eccentricity jumps, and the numerical LPE solutions use the same Hamiltonian, so they are a consistency check of the averaging analysis rather than a circular derivation. The frequent citations to the authors' earlier papers [20,37,72] supply formalism and background frequencies, but those are standard, independently checkable geodesic/tidal results, and the new magnetic claim does not reduce to any of them. Two genuine non-circular weaknesses should be weighed separately: (i) Appendix A does not solve Eq. (A.9) and says the accelerated-frame tetrad corrections are negligible 'Without explicitly solving the system (A.9)' while assuming r-hat constant; if wrong, the Hamiltonian (2.18) could miss same-order 0.5PN terms, but that is an unproved physical approximation, not a definitional reduction. (ii) Eq. (5.13)'s printed angular factor cos^2 I/[2(1-2cosI)] appears inconsistent with the text and with Eq. (5.6), but this is a typographical/analytical error, not circularity. Neither defect makes the prediction equal to its input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the central result follows from a Hamiltonian with standard physical constants and scenario inputs (masses, semi-major axes, inclinations) chosen by hand. The analytical model introduces no ad hoc constants beyond choosing to truncate the outer-eccentricity expansion at O(ê). However, the paper relies on several domain assumptions (small-tide, geodesic CoM, quasi-circular outer orbit) and on prior self-authored formalism [20,37,72].

axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Small-tide approximation: the inner binary's size r is much smaller than the curvature radius R of the SMBH; only quadrupolar tidal terms are kept.
    Adopted in Sec. II; ensures the tidal interaction is perturbative and allows truncation at (r/R)^2.
  • domain assumption The inner binary can be treated as a Newtonian two-body system with small PN corrections; separation much larger than the compact objects' Schwarzschild radii.
    Sec. II; needed to use Keplerian orbital elements and Lagrange Planetary Equations.
  • domain assumption The center-of-mass of the inner binary follows a Schwarzschild geodesic; deviations induced by the accelerated frame are negligible at quadrupolar order.
    Sec. II and App. A (Eqs. A.4–A.9); load-bearing for the 0.5PN Hamiltonian (2.18).
  • domain assumption Resonance crossing is driven mainly by 2.5PN gravitational radiation reaction; environmental effects are neglected or parameterized by α.
    Sec. VI (Eq. 6.1) and App. D; assumes T_1PN ≪ T_ZLK and T_RR governs the inspiral.
  • domain assumption At leading order in outer eccentricity, the outer radial motion and Marck angle are given by the quasi-circular solution (5.8) and the frequencies (5.10).
    Sec. V B; the analytical resonance amplitudes and positions rest on this expansion to O(ê).
  • standard math Standard action-angle formalism for bound geodesics in Schwarzschild spacetime, with fundamental frequencies Ω_r, Ω_ϕ, Ω_Ψ.
    Sec. V A; based on Refs. [41,43–45,85].
  • standard math Lagrange Planetary Equations in the generalized Lagrange gauge are a valid symplectic system for the osculating elements.
    Sec. III (Eqs. 3.11–3.17) and Sec. VI (Eq. 6.3); from Refs. [79,83].

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 28663 in / 16784 out tokens · 160141 ms · 2026-08-04T07:37:54.873756+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study hierarchical triple systems formed by a compact binary orbiting a supermassive black hole (SMBH), focusing on the role of relativistic magnetic tidal interactions. Extending previous analyses of precession resonances to 0.5 post-Newtonian order, we incorporate quadrupolar magnetic tidal moments, which have no Newtonian counterpart. We find that magnetic tides introduce new resonances absent at lower order, leading to additional eccentricity excitations and significantly modifying the binary's long-term evolution. Numerical solutions of the Lagrange Planetary Equations confirm these analytical predictions and reveal how resonance strength depends on orbital eccentricity and inclination. The resulting dynamics accelerates the binary merger and imprints distinctive signatures on gravitational waves, potentially observable by LISA. Our findings identify magnetic tidal coupling as a novel strong-gravity effect and establish its importance for the resonant dynamics of compact-object binaries near SMBHs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.24897 by Daniele Pica, Davide Panella, Gianluca Grignani, Marta Cocco, Marta Orselli, Troels Harmark.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Evolution of the eccentricity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of the first precession resonance encountered by the inner binary as a function of the outer semi-major [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Evolution of the eccentricity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evolution of the eccentricity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of the eccentricity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Periodic line-of-sight velocity-driven modulations to gravitational waves emitted by compact binaries in Keplerian outer orbits

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    New waveform corrections for periodic Doppler shifts from circular and eccentric outer orbits let future gravitational-wave detectors measure the mass and orbit of a third body around a merging binary.

  2. Periodic line-of-sight velocity-driven modulations to gravitational waves emitted by compact binaries in Keplerian outer orbits

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Periodic non-relativistic line-of-sight velocity of a compact binary’s centre of mass produces 4PN phase and amplitude modulations that improve Fisher forecasts of tertiary mass and outer-orbit size for A+, ET, DECIGO...

  3. Dynamics of Binary System around a Supermassive Black Hole :Binary Scattering and Eccentric vZLK Oscillations

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Binaries around supermassive black holes exhibit four periapsis-dependent scattering regimes in unbound orbits and scattering-type eccentric vZLK oscillations in bound orbits within Kerr spacetime.

  4. Tidal perturbations of an extreme mass ratio inspiral around a Kerr black hole

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    A closed-form Kerr metric under slow quadrupolar tides yields spin-dependent tidal shifts of the ISCO and light ring, with larger shifts for retrograde orbits around fast-spinning holes.

  5. Dynamics of Binary System around a Supermassive Black Hole :Binary Scattering and Eccentric vZLK Oscillations

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Binaries around SMBHs exhibit four scattering regimes in unbound orbits and scattering-type eccentric vZLK oscillations in bound orbits, yielding a unified periapsis-driven tidal dynamics picture in galactic nuclei.

  6. Gravitational waves of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals in a rotating black hole with Dehnen dark matter halo

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    EMRI waveforms in a rotating black hole with Dehnen DM halo show amplitude and phase shifts from Kerr, with mismatch rising as DM mass parameter and black hole spin increase.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 63 linked inside Pith · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Newton,Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (England, 1687)

    I. Newton,Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (England, 1687)

  2. [2]

    Euler,Theoria motuum lunae nova methodo pertrac- tata: una cum tabulis astronomicis(1772)

    L. Euler,Theoria motuum lunae nova methodo pertrac- tata: una cum tabulis astronomicis(1772)

  3. [3]

    Lagrange, M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences de Paris (1783), included in Œuvres de Lagrange, Vol

    J.-L. Lagrange, M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences de Paris (1783), included in Œuvres de Lagrange, Vol. IV (Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1869)

  4. [4]

    Delaunay,Th´ eorie du mouvement de la lune, M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie des sciences de l’Institut de France

    C. Delaunay,Th´ eorie du mouvement de la lune, M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie des sciences de l’Institut de France. S´ erie 2 No. pt. 1 (Didot, 1860)

  5. [5]

    Poincar´ e, Bulletin astronomique, Observatoire de Paris8, 12 (1891)

    H. Poincar´ e, Bulletin astronomique, Observatoire de Paris8, 12 (1891)

  6. [6]

    A. E. H. Love,Some problems of geodynamics : being an essay to which the Adams prize in the University of Cambridge was adjudged in 1911(University Press, Cam- bridge, 1911)

    1911

  7. [7]

    Hinderer, Astrophys

    T. Hinderer, Astrophys. J.677, 1216 (2008), [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 697, 964 (2009)], arXiv:0711.2420 [astro- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Phys. Rev. D77, 021502 (2008), arXiv:0709.1915 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  9. [9]

    Damour and A

    T. Damour and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D80, 084035 (2009), arXiv:0906.0096 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  10. [10]

    Binnington and E

    T. Binnington and E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D80, 084018 (2009), arXiv:0906.1366 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  11. [11]

    Samsing, K

    J. Samsing, K. Hendriks, L. Zwick, D. J. D’Orazio, and B. Liu, (2024), arXiv:2403.05625 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Hendriks, D

    K. Hendriks, D. Atallah, M. Martinez, M. Zevin, L. Zwick, A. A. Trani, P. Saini, J. Tak´ atsy, and J. Sam- sing, (2024), arXiv:2411.08572 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Saini, L

    P. Saini, L. Zwick, J. Tak´ atsy, C. Rowan, K. Hendriks, G. Fabj, D. J. D’Orazio, and J. Samsing, (2025), arXiv:2508.17348 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    H. V. Zeipel, Astronomische Nachrichten183, 345 (1909)

    1909

  15. [15]

    Kozai, Astron

    Y. Kozai, Astron. J.67, 591 (1962)

    1962

  16. [16]

    Lidov, Planetary and Space Science9, 719 (1962)

    M. Lidov, Planetary and Space Science9, 719 (1962)

    1962

  17. [17]

    Hu, R.-G

    L. Hu, R.-G. Cai, and S.-J. Wang, JCAP08, 010 (2025), arXiv:2411.14047 [gr-qc]. 20

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    R. S. Chandramouli and N. Yunes, Phys. Rev. D105, 064009 (2022), arXiv:2107.00741 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Randall and Z.-Z

    L. Randall and Z.-Z. Xianyu, Astrophys. J.864, 134 (2018), arXiv:1802.05718 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    Camilloni, T

    F. Camilloni, T. Harmark, G. Grignani, M. Orselli, and D. Pica, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.531, 1884 (2024), arXiv:2310.06894 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Antonini and H

    F. Antonini and H. B. Perets, Astrophys. J.757, 27 (2012), arXiv:1203.2938 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [22]

    Maeda, P

    K.-i. Maeda, P. Gupta, and H. Okawa, Phys. Rev. D 107, 124039 (2023), arXiv:2303.16553 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Maeda, P

    K.-i. Maeda, P. Gupta, and H. Okawa, Phys. Rev. D 108, 123041 (2023), arXiv:2309.12096 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Maeda and H

    K.-i. Maeda and H. Okawa, (2025), arXiv:2504.18934 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Naoz, Ann

    S. Naoz, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.54, 441 (2016), arXiv:1601.07175 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Bonga, H

    B. Bonga, H. Yang, and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 101103 (2019), arXiv:1905.00030 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Gupta, B

    P. Gupta, B. Bonga, A. J. K. Chua, and T. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D104, 044056 (2021), arXiv:2104.03422 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    ´E. E. Flanagan, S. A. Hughes, and U. Ruangsri, Phys. Rev. D89, 084028 (2014), arXiv:1208.3906 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 071102 (2012), arXiv:1009.4923 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  30. [30]

    Zwick, K

    L. Zwick, K. Hendriks, D. O’Neill, J. Tak´ atsy, P. Kirke- berg, C. Tiede, J. Stegmann, J. Samsing, and D. J. D’Orazio, (2025), arXiv:2506.09140 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Sharpe, Y

    C. Sharpe, Y. B. Ginat, and B. Kocsis, (2025), arXiv:2502.01733 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    H. G. Bhaskar, G. Li, and D. N. C. Lin, Astrophys. J. 934, 141 (2022), arXiv:2204.07282 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Stockinger and M

    M. Stockinger and M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D110, 043038 (2024), arXiv:2403.06834 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Stockinger and M

    M. Stockinger and M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D111, 123044 (2025), arXiv:2502.06998 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    K. S. Thorne and J. B. Hartle, Phys. Rev. D31, 1815 (1984)

    1984

  36. [36]

    Poisson and I

    E. Poisson and I. Vlasov, Phys. Rev. D81, 024029 (2010), arXiv:0910.4311 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    Cocco, G

    M. Cocco, G. Grignani, T. Harmark, M. Orselli, and D. Pica, Phys. Rev. D112, 044010 (2025), arXiv:2505.15901 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Generozov, N

    A. Generozov, N. C. Stone, B. D. Metzger, and J. P. Ostriker, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.478, 4030 (2018), arXiv:1804.01543 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    Chen and W.-B

    X. Chen and W.-B. Han, Communications Physics1, 53 (2018), arXiv:1801.05780 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Kuntz, Phys

    A. Kuntz, Phys. Rev. D105, 024017 (2022), arXiv:2112.05167 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    van de Meent, Class

    M. van de Meent, Class. Quant. Grav.37, 145007 (2020), arXiv:1906.05090 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    D. Bini, A. Geralico, and R. T. Jantzen, Phys. Rev. D 94, 064066 (2016), arXiv:1607.08427 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    Schmidt, Class

    W. Schmidt, Class. Quant. Grav.19, 2743 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0202090

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  44. [44]

    Fujita and W

    R. Fujita and W. Hikida, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 135002 (2009), arXiv:0906.1420 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  45. [45]

    Hinderer and E

    T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D78, 064028 (2008), arXiv:0805.3337 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    R. M. O’Leary, B. Kocsis, and A. Loeb, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.395, 2127 (2009), arXiv:0807.2638 [astro- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  47. [47]

    Samsing and E

    J. Samsing and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, Astrophys. J. Lett. 840, L14 (2017), arXiv:1703.09703 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    Hopman and T

    C. Hopman and T. Alexander, Astrophys. J.645, 1152 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0601161

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    J. M. Bellovary, M.-M. Mac Low, B. McKernan, and K. E. S. Ford, Astrophys. J. Lett.819, L17 (2016), arXiv:1511.00005 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Secunda, J

    A. Secunda, J. Bellovary, M.-M. Mac Low, K. E. S. Ford, B. McKernan, N. W. C. Leigh, W. Lyra, Z. San- dor, and J. I. Adorno, Astrophys. J.903, 133 (2020), arXiv:2004.11936 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Peng and X

    P. Peng and X. Chen, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505, 1324 (2021), arXiv:2104.07685 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Tagawa, Z

    H. Tagawa, Z. Haiman, and B. Kocsis, Astrophys. J. 898, 25 (2020), arXiv:1912.08218 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Cardoso, C

    V. Cardoso, C. F. B. Macedo, and R. Vicente, Phys. Rev. D103, 023015 (2021), arXiv:2010.15151 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Zwick, P

    L. Zwick, P. R. Capelo, E. Bortolas, V. Vazquez-Aceves, L. Mayer, and P. Amaro-Seoane, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.506, 1007 (2021), arXiv:2102.00015 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Caneva Santoro, S

    G. Caneva Santoro, S. Roy, R. Vicente, M. Haney, O. J. Piccinni, W. Del Pozzo, and M. Martinez, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 251401 (2024), arXiv:2309.05061 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Ishibashi and M

    W. Ishibashi and M. Gr¨ obner, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.529, 883 (2024), arXiv:2412.01925 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Barausse and L

    E. Barausse and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. D77, 104027 (2008), arXiv:0711.4558 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  58. [58]

    Barausse, V

    E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Phys. Rev. D89, 104059 (2014), arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    Cardoso and C

    V. Cardoso and C. F. B. Macedo, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, 1963 (2020), arXiv:2008.01091 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1963

  60. [60]

    P. S. Cole, G. Bertone, A. Coogan, D. Gaggero, T. Karydas, B. J. Kavanagh, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. M. Tomaselli, Nature Astron.7, 943 (2023), arXiv:2211.01362 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    R. Chen, R. S. Chandramouli, F. Pozzoli, R. Buscic- chio, and E. Barausse, Phys. Rev. D112, 084053 (2025), arXiv:2507.00694 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 101102 (2020), arXiv:2009.01075 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Toubianaet al., Phys

    A. Toubianaet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 101105 (2021), arXiv:2010.06056 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    M. J. Grahamet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 251102 (2020), arXiv:2006.14122 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Sbernaet al., Phys

    L. Sbernaet al., Phys. Rev. D106, 064056 (2022), arXiv:2205.08550 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Peißker, M

    F. Peißker, M. Zajacek, L. Labadie, E. Bordier, A. Eckart, M. Melamed, and V. Karas, Nature Com- mun.15, 10608 (2024), arXiv:2412.12727 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    J. S. Santos, V. Cardoso, J. Nat´ ario, and M. van de Meent, (2025), arXiv:2506.14868 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Y. Yin, J. Mathews, A. J. K. Chua, and X. Chen, Phys. Rev. D111, 103007 (2025), arXiv:2410.09796 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    K. Meng, H. Zhang, X.-L. Fan, Y. Yong, and F. Du, (2024), arXiv:2405.07113 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Jiang, W.-B

    Y. Jiang, W.-B. Han, X.-Y. Zhong, P. Shen, Z.-R. Luo, and Y.-L. Wu, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 478 (2024)

    2024

  71. [71]

    Amaro-Seoaneet al., arXiv preprint (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al., arXiv preprint (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  72. [72]

    Camilloni, G

    F. Camilloni, G. Grignani, T. Harmark, R. Oliveri, M. Orselli, and D. Pica, Phys. Rev. D107, 084011 (2023), arXiv:2301.04879 [gr-qc]. 21

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Kuntz, F

    A. Kuntz, F. Serra, and E. Trincherini, Phys. Rev. D 104, 024016 (2021), arXiv:2104.13387 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  74. [74]

    Kuntz, F

    A. Kuntz, F. Serra, and E. Trincherini, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044011 (2023), arXiv:2210.13493 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Marck, Proc

    J.-A. Marck, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A385, 431 (1983)

    1983

  76. [76]

    Goldstein,Classical Mechanics(Addison-Wesley, 1980)

    H. Goldstein,Classical Mechanics(Addison-Wesley, 1980)

    1980

  77. [77]

    Morbidelli, Modern celestial mechanics : aspects of so- lar system dynamics

    A. Morbidelli, Modern celestial mechanics : aspects of so- lar system dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis, 2002, ISBN 0415279399-1(2002)

    2002

  78. [78]

    Valtonen and H

    M. Valtonen and H. Karttunen,The Three-Body Problem (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)

    2006

  79. [79]

    Efroimsky and P

    M. Efroimsky and P. Goldreich, Astron. Astrophys.415, 1187 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0307130

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  80. [80]

    Lagrange, M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences de Paris (1808), included in Œuvres de Lagrange, Vol

    J.-L. Lagrange, M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences de Paris (1808), included in Œuvres de Lagrange, Vol. VI, 713 (Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1877)

Showing first 80 references.