Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 94 references

Periodic outer-orbit Doppler motion imprints measurable 4 PN phase and amplitude corrections on gravitational-wave signals, yielding tighter single-event constraints on a tertiary mass and orbit than constant-acceleration approximations.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 01:30 UTC pith:LY6WQKDW

load-bearing objection Solid closed-form periodic LOSV corrections that properly extend the constant-acceleration templates; Fisher gains are real for massive tertiaries but overstated for stellar-mass ones once Shapiro is admitted. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09644 v1 pith:LY6WQKDW submitted 2026-07-10 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Periodic line-of-sight velocity-driven modulations to gravitational waves emitted by compact binaries in Keplerian outer orbits

Avinash Tiwari , Shasvath J. Kapadia , Aditya Vijaykumar , Sourav Chatterjee This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords gravitational wavescompact binary coalescencesline-of-sight velocityDoppler modulationpost-Newtonian correctionsFisher matrixhierarchical triplesKeplerian outer orbits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

When a compact binary merges near a third body or in a dense environment, its centre of mass moves with a time-varying line-of-sight velocity. That motion Doppler-shifts the gravitational-wave signal, changing both phase and amplitude. Earlier work treated the motion as a constant acceleration or its time derivatives, valid only when the outer orbital period is much longer than the observation. This paper derives the exact leading-order corrections for fully periodic circular and eccentric outer orbits. The corrections appear at 4 post-Newtonian order, reduce to the known constant-kinematic formulae in the long-period limit, and produce distinctive in-and-out-of-phase waveforms when the outer period is shorter than the signal. Fisher-matrix forecasts for next-generation ground- and space-based detectors show that the full periodic waveforms recover the tertiary mass and outer-orbit size more tightly, and over a larger volume of parameter space, than the earlier approximations. The result supplies a practical single-event diagnostic of merger environments that constant-acceleration templates miss.

Core claim

Phase and amplitude corrections arising from a periodic non-relativistic line-of-sight velocity of a compact binary’s centre of mass, for both circular and eccentric outer orbits, enter the gravitational-wave waveform at 4 post-Newtonian order. These corrections reduce exactly to the previously known constant-acceleration and higher-derivative formulae when the observation duration is much shorter than the outer orbital period, and they yield significantly tighter Fisher-matrix constraints on tertiary mass and outer-orbit size than those approximate methods.

What carries the argument

The frequency-domain phase and amplitude corrections (Eqs. 14–15 for circular orbits, Eqs. 20–21 for eccentric orbits) obtained under the stationary-phase approximation by integrating the Doppler-shifted frequency and time relations for a Keplerian outer orbit; these enter the waveform at 4 PN order and serve as the basis for the subsequent Fisher forecasts.

Load-bearing premise

The entire derivation assumes the line-of-sight Doppler factor remains small (at most a few percent) and that the stationary-phase approximation stays valid after the frequency band is cut at a critical value that keeps the instantaneous frequency rising.

What would settle it

Inject the derived periodic waveforms into mock data for a known tertiary mass and outer orbit, recover the parameters with a full Bayesian analysis, and check whether the recovered errors match the Fisher forecasts and improve on constant-acceleration templates as claimed.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Next-generation detectors can place single-event lower limits on tertiary mass and outer-orbit radius for a range of stellar-mass, intermediate-mass and supermassive companions.
  • Waveform banks that omit the periodic Doppler terms will systematically under-estimate environmental parameters when the outer period is comparable to or shorter than the signal duration.
  • The same corrections can be applied mode-by-mode to higher harmonics via a simple frequency rescaling of the phase.
  • Systems previously excluded by the long-period approximation become accessible, expanding the volume of parameter space that can be profiled on a single-event basis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the periodic corrections prove measurable in real data, a modest fraction of AGN-disk or nuclear-star-cluster mergers could be flagged as hierarchical triples without electromagnetic counterparts.
  • The formalism naturally suggests a model-selection test between constant-acceleration and full-Keplerian templates that could be run on every sufficiently loud event.
  • Extending the same expansion beyond the non-relativistic Doppler limit would be the next natural step for systems near the stability boundary.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives frequency-domain phase and amplitude corrections (at 4 PN order) to the (2,2) GW waveform of a compact binary whose centre-of-mass follows a non-relativistic periodic line-of-sight velocity induced by a circular or eccentric Keplerian outer orbit about a tertiary. The corrections (Eqs. 14–15 for circular, Eqs. 20–21 and Appendix A for eccentric) reduce to the known constant-acceleration (and higher time-derivative) results when the outer period greatly exceeds the observation time. A Fisher-matrix analysis then forecasts constraints on tertiary mass M3 and outer-orbit size a (and eccentricity) for A+, ET, DECIGO and LISA configurations, claiming significantly tighter bounds than those obtained from the constant-kinematic approximations of prior work.

Significance. If the derivations and forecasts hold, the work supplies ready-to-use waveform corrections that extend the reach of single-event environmental inference into the short-outer-period regime previously inaccessible to Taylor-expanded LOSA models. The careful SPA-validity cuts, three-body stability demarcations, and explicit reduction to known limits are strengths; the concrete detectability maps for stellar-mass through supermassive tertiaries will be useful for planning analyses with next-generation detectors. The analytic expressions themselves are a clear, reusable contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. III F (Eqs. 43–48) shows that the Shapiro term dΔt_SE/dtu can exceed the Doppler shift z_LE for near-edge-on orbits (the geometry fixed by sin ι_out = 1) when M3 ≲ MS. The Fisher forecasts and “significantly improved” claims of the abstract and Figs. 3 and 6 are nevertheless presented for precisely this stellar-mass, short-period regime without the Shapiro contribution. Either the forecasts must be recomputed with both effects, the low-M3 regions must be excised or strongly caveated, or the abstract claim must be restricted to the M3 ≫ MS domain where Shapiro is sub-dominant.
  2. Sec. III C fixes sin ι_out = 1 and states that the reported errors on M3 and a are therefore only lower limits. Because this degeneracy is never broken and the same edge-on geometry maximises the Shapiro contamination discussed above, the quantitative improvement over constant-kinematic methods cannot be claimed as a firm forecast; the figures should be re-labelled or the text should quantify the degradation for more face-on outer orbits.
minor comments (4)
  1. The e_out series (Appendix A) is truncated at O(e^4) and stated to converge only for e_out ≤ 0.66; a brief numerical check of residual error at the fiducial e_out = 0.5 would strengthen confidence.
  2. Amplitude corrections are given only for the (2,2) mode; while the phase transformation for higher modes is noted, a sentence clarifying that the Fisher matrices omit higher-mode amplitude effects would avoid ambiguity.
  3. Figs. 3–7 use a dense colour scale that makes the δX = 1 contour hard to read; a solid contour line or a second panel with binary “measurable/unmeasurable” would improve clarity.
  4. The phrase “4 PN order” for a purely kinematic Doppler effect is conventional in the authors’ prior papers but may confuse readers accustomed to dynamical PN counting; a short clarifying footnote would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: phase/amplitude corrections are derived from first-principles Doppler+SPA, Fisher forecasts use synthetic signals, and self-citations only supply recoverable limiting cases.

full rationale

The central results (phase and amplitude corrections at 4 PN for periodic non-relativistic LOS velocity, Eqs. 14–15 and 20–21) follow by direct integration of the Doppler-shifted SPA relations (Eqs. 7–11, 17–19) starting from the Keplerian LOSV expressions (1)–(2). No free parameters are fitted to data; the expressions are analytic. The claimed reduction to constant-kinematic (LOSA) corrections is an independent consistency check obtained by Taylor expansion of the new formulae in the limit ξ/v^8 ≪ 1 (Appendix C, Eq. C1), not a definitional identity. Fisher-matrix forecasts (Sec. III A–C) invert synthetic signals with known injected parameters and apply Jacobians (34, 37) to map (z_L0, Ω_det) → (M3, a); they contain no observational inversion or post-hoc fitting. Self-citations to the authors’ prior LOSA papers ([18], [31], [37]) are used only to identify the recovered limiting cases and to update earlier constraint plots; they are not load-bearing premises that force the new periodic results. Amplitude corrections are shown to be negligible for the Fisher matrix and are omitted without circular effect. The analysis is therefore self-contained against its own inputs; the single minor self-citation does not raise the score above 1.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard post-Newtonian SPA waveform theory, Keplerian three-body kinematics, and the non-relativistic Doppler approximation. No new particles or forces are introduced. Free parameters are only analysis choices (fiducial angles, eccentricity, z_L,0 cap) used for forecasts, not fitted to data. The load-bearing modelling axioms are the SPA, z_L,0 ≪ 1, and the neglect of Shapiro delay / tidal dephasing inside the quoted parameter space.

free parameters (3)
  • z_L,0 upper bound = 0.05
    Authors cap maximum Doppler shift at 0.05 (and z_L,0/√(1−e_out²) ≤ 0.05 for EOO) to stay non-relativistic; this choice sets the lower limit a ≳ 200 Rs and defines the domain of all forecasts.
  • fiducial outer-orbit angles and eccentricity = θ_c=ϑ_p=0.1 (or 0.45); e_out=0.5
    θ_c = ϑ_p = 0.1 rad (or 0.45 for one comparison) and e_out = 0.5 are fixed by hand for all Fisher grids; results depend on these choices.
  • mutual inclination ι_mut and outer inclination ι_out = ι_mut=π/2; sin ι_out=1
    ι_mut fixed to π/2 (face-on inner, edge-on outer) and sin ι_out fixed to 1; both remove degeneracies and make reported M3, a errors lower limits.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Stationary-phase approximation remains valid once f ≥ f_SPA so that dfo/dto > 0
    All frequency-domain corrections and Fisher integrals assume SPA (Sec. II–III B, Eqs. 28, 31).
  • domain assumption Outer orbit is Keplerian and non-relativistic (z_L,0 ≪ 1); only linear order in z_L,0 is kept
    Doppler factors M_LC/LE = M(1+z_L) and all expansions truncate at O(z_L,0) (Sec. II).
  • standard math Eccentric anomaly expansions of cos ϑ, sin ϑ converge for e_out ≤ 0.6627 (Murray & Dermott)
    EOO phase/amplitude series stop at O(e_out^4) using standard solar-system expansions (Appendix A).
  • domain assumption Gravitational redshift and Shapiro delay are sub-dominant to Doppler shift inside the stable, z_L,0 ≤ 0.05 domain
    Sec. III E–F argue z_G/z_LE and dΔt_SE/dtu are smaller than the Doppler term except for near-edge-on M3 ≲ MS cases deferred to future work.
  • domain assumption Fisher matrix (high-SNR Gaussian) forecasts adequately rank measurability of M3 and a
    All constraint maps (Figs. 3–7) are Fisher-based; authors note Bayesian model selection would be needed on real data (Sec. V).
  • ad hoc to paper Leading-order (Newtonian) PN waveform plus 4 PN LOSV corrections suffice; higher-PN LOSV corrections and tidal dephasing omitted
    Explicitly stated as future work (Sec. V); amplitude corrections for higher modes also left for later.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 41761 in / 3859 out tokens · 41299 ms · 2026-07-13T01:30:23.476926+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The centre of mass (CoM) of compact binary coalescences (CBCs) occurring in the vicinity of a supermassive black hole, through interaction with an arbitrary third body (e.g., of stellar mass), or in a dense stellar environment, will undergo a time-varying line-of-sight (LOS) velocity. This in turn leads to a time-varying Doppler shift and corresponding modulations in the shape of the gravitational waves (GWs). The phase and amplitude corrections arising from constant LOS acceleration and its higher-order time derivatives are already known. Specifically, these effects lead to corrections to the GW waveform at $-4n$ post-Newtonian (PN) order, where $n$ is the $n^{th}$ time derivative of the LOS velocity. In the context of a circular or eccentric outer orbit of the CoM of the CBC, these effects can be thought of as approximations to the LOS velocity in the limit: observation duration $\ll$ period of the outer orbit. However, this condition is not necessarily always satisfied. In this {\it paper}, we present phase and amplitude corrections to the GW waveforms arising from a periodic non-relativistic LOS velocity for circular and eccentric outer orbits of the CBC's CoM. Specifically, these lead to phase and amplitude modulations at 4 PN order, and reduce to the known corrections for constant kinematic parameters under appropriate limits mentioned above. We also perform a Fisher matrix analysis to forecast constraints on the environment that is sourcing the time-varying LOS velocity, for various future ground and space-based detectors. We further show that constraints acquired using GW waveforms derived in this work improve significantly in comparison to those acquired from approximate methods valid for constant kinematic parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09644 by Aditya Vijaykumar, Avinash Tiwari, Shasvath J. Kapadia, Sourav Chatterjee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The schematic representation of a BH (M3) and a BBH (MS) orbiting in eccentric orbits around the system’s centre of mass (barycenter) O. ϑp is the longitude of periapsis, ϑ is the true anomaly of the outer orbit, and ιout is the angle between the angular momentum (along the Z-axis) of the outer orbit and the observer’s LOS ˆn. Let M = m1+m2 be the cosmologically redshifted total mass of the CBC, where m1 =… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example Waveform: The top panel shows the time domain waveform of a non-spinning static BBH at 500 Mpc having component masses m1,S = m2,S = 10 M⊙, the middle panel shows the same when there is a 8 M⊙ BH in the vicinity of this BBH at 2.25 × 103 Rs in a COO perturbing the motion of its CoM — this configuration leads to zL,0 = 8 × 10−3 and Ωdet = 0.142 Hz, and the bottom panel shows the difference between t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: SBH-IMBH: Left two panels show the relative errors in the measurement of mass of the tertiary M3 (top panels) and radius of the outer orbit a (bottom panels) over a grid of M3 and a for the A+: BNS and ET: BNS cases mentioned in Table I in COO scenario, while the right two panels show the same for A+: BBH and ET: BBH cases. The patches on the upper right represent the parameter space where either δX > 1 fo… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SMBH: The left and right panels show the relative errors in the measurement of M3 (top panels) and a (bottom panels) over a grid of M3 and a for the A+: BNS and ET: BNS cases mentioned in Table I in COO scenario, respectively. The patches on the upper right and the dotted lines have the same meaning as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SMBH: Left two panels show the relative errors in the measurement of M3 (top panels) and a (bottom panels) over a grid of M3 and a for the A+: NSBH and ET: BBH2 cases mentioned in Table I in COO scenario, while the right two panels show the same for DECIGO: BBH and LISA: BBH cases. Unlike other cases, here we have fixed θc = 0.45, i.e., cos θc ≈ 0.9 to compare our results against [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: SBH-IMBH: Left two panels show the relative errors in the measurement of mass of the tertiary M3 (top panels), semi-major axis of the outer orbit a (middle panels), and eccentricity of the outer orbit eout (bottom panels) over a grid of M3 and a for the A+: BNS and ET: BNS cases mentioned in Table I in EOO scenario, while the right two panels show the same for A+: BBH and ET: BBH cases. The patches on the … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: SMBH: left panel show the relative errors in the measurement of M3 (top panels), a (middle panels), and eout (bottom panels) over a grid of M3 and a for the ET: BNS case mentioned in Table I in EOO scenario, the middle panel from left shows the same for the DECIGO: BBH case, while right panel shows the same for the LISA: BBH case. The patches on the upper right and the dotted lines have the same meaning as… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Example Waveform: The upper panel shows the time domain waveform of the non-spinning static BBH considered in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example Waveform: The upper panel shows the time domain waveform of the perturbed BBH considered in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The upper panel shows the frequency domain waveforms of the A+: BBH system considered in Table I in presence of a 8 M⊙ BH in the vicinity at a = 3 × 104 Rs in COO scenario after incorporating only LOSA corrections (blue) in the waveform and full LOSV corrections (orange), while the middle panel shows that of the same in time domain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: A comparison of the phase corrections due to LOSV, LOSA, and other terms appearing in the expansion of Equation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The variation of acrit,KL/acrit, equation (55), with the mass of the tertiary in the vicinity of the BNS and BBH systems considered in A+ and ET (see Table I) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: SMBH: The left two panels show the relative errors in the measurement of M3 (top panels) and a (bottom panels) over a grid of M3 and a for the DECIGO: BBH and LISA: BBH cases corresponding to top panels of Figures 3 and 4 of [37] in EOO scenario and the right two panels show the corresponding relative errors in the measurement of zL,0 (top panels) and Ωdet (bottom panels). The patches on the upper right a… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: SBH-IMBH: The left two panels show the relative errors in the measurement of zL,0 (top panels) and Ωdet (bottom panels) over a grid of M3 and a for the A+: BNS and ET: BNS cases corresponding to 3 in COO scenario, while the right two panels show the same for A+: BBH and ET: BBH cases. The patches on the upper right and bottom left, and the dashed and dotted lines have the same meaning as in [PITH_FULL_IM… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: SMBH: The left and right panels show the relative errors in the measurement of zL,0 (top panels) and Ωdet (bottom panels) over a grid of M3 and a for the A+: BNS and ET: BNS cases corresponding to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: SMBH: The left two panels show the relative errors in the measurement of zL,0 (top panels) and Ωdet (bottom panels) over a grid of M3 and a for the A+: NSBH and ET: BBH2 cases corresponding to 5 in COO scenario, while the right two panels show the same for DECIGO: BBH and LISA: BBH cases. The patches on the upper right and the dotted lines have the same meaning as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p02… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: SBH-IMBH: The left two panels show the relative errors in the measurement of zL,0 (top panels) and Ωdet (bottom panels) over a grid of M3 and a for the A+: BNS and ET: BNS cases corresponding to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: SMBH: The left, middle, and right panels show the relative errors in the measurement of zL,0 (top panels) and Ωdet (bottom panels) over a grid of M3 and a for the ET: BNS, DECIGO: BBH, and LISA: BBH cases, respectively, corresponding to 7 in EOO scenario. The patches on the upper right have the same meaning as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_18.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Advanced LIGO,

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), “Advanced LIGO,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,

    F. Acerneseet al.(Virgo), “Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history,

    T. Akutsuet al.(KAGRA), “Overview of KAGRA: Detector design and construction history,” PTEP2021, 05A101 (2021), arXiv:2005.05574 [physics.ins-det]

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Interferome- ter design of the kagra gravitational wave detector,

    Yoichi Aso, Yuta Michimura, Kentaro Somiya, Masaki Ando, Osamu Miyakawa, Takanori Sekiguchi, Daisuke Tatsumi, and Hiroaki Yamamoto (The KAGRA Collaboration), “Interferome- ter design of the kagra gravitational wave detector,” Phys. Rev. D88, 043007 (2013)

    2013

  5. [5]

    GWTC- 5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog,

    None Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC- 5.0: An Introduction to Version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog,” (2026), arXiv:2605.27223 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    GWTC- 4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo- KAGRA Observing Run,

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC- 4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo- KAGRA Observing Run,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Formation Channels of Single and Binary Stellar-Mass Black Holes,

    Michela Mapelli, “Formation Channels of Single and Binary Stellar-Mass Black Holes,” inHandbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy(2021) p. 16

    2021

  8. [8]

    Gw170817: Observation of gravi- tational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral,

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott,et al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), “Gw170817: Observation of gravi- tational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017)

    2017

  9. [9]

    Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger*,

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott,et al., “Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger*,” The Astrophysi- cal Journal Letters848, L12 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    GWTC- 3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), “GWTC- 3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Finding the One: Identify- ing the Host Galaxies of Gravitational-Wave Sources,

    Hsin-Yu Chen and Daniel E. Holz, “Finding the One: Identify- ing the Host Galaxies of Gravitational-Wave Sources,” (2016), arXiv:1612.01471 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    GWTC- 4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries,

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC- 4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries,” (2025), arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    GWTC-5.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Bina- ries,

    “GWTC-5.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Bina- ries,” (2026), arXiv:2605.27226 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  14. [14]

    One Chan- nel to Rule Them All? Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Using Multiple Formation Pathways,

    Michael Zevin, Simone S. Bavera, Christopher P. L. Berry, Vicky Kalogera, Tassos Fragos, Pablo Marchant, Carl L. Rodriguez, Fabio Antonini, Daniel E. Holz, and Chris Pankow, “One Chan- nel to Rule Them All? Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Using Multiple Formation Pathways,” Astrophys. J.910, 152 (2021), arXiv:2011.10057 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    The spin magnitude of stellar-mass binary black holes evolves with the mass: evidence from gravitational wave data,

    Grégoire Pierra, Simone Mastrogiovanni, and Stéphane Perriès, “The spin magnitude of stellar-mass binary black holes evolves with the mass: evidence from gravitational wave data,” (2024), arXiv:2406.01679 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Effect of massive perturbers on extreme mass-ratio inspiral waveforms,

    Nicolás Yunes, M. Coleman Miller, and Jonathan Thornburg, “Effect of massive perturbers on extreme mass-ratio inspiral waveforms,” Phys. Rev. D83, 044030 (2011)

    2011

  17. [17]

    Effect of matter structure on the gravitational wave- form,

    Camille Bonvin, Chiara Caprini, Riccardo Sturani, and Nicola Tamanini, “Effect of matter structure on the gravitational wave- form,” Phys. Rev. D95, 044029 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    Waltzing binaries: Probing the line-of-sight acceleration of merging compact objects with gravitational waves,

    Aditya Vijaykumar, Avinash Tiwari, Shasvath J. Kapadia, K. G. Arun, and Parameswaran Ajith, “Waltzing binaries: Probing the line-of-sight acceleration of merging compact objects with gravitational waves,” The Astrophysical Journal954, 105 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Gravi- tational waveform model for detecting accelerating inspiraling binaries,

    Malcolm Lazarow, Nathaniel Leslie, and Liang Dai, “Gravi- tational waveform model for detecting accelerating inspiraling binaries,” Phys. Rev. D110, 083008 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Grav- itational waveform of constantly accelerating sources,

    Xiaokai He, Xiaolin Liu, Zhoujian Cao, and Xian Chen, “Grav- itational waveform of constantly accelerating sources,” Class. Quant. Grav.43, 105005 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    A Novel Method to Construct Frequency-Domain Gravitational Waveform for Ac- celerating Sources,

    Xinmiao Zhao, Han Yan, and Xian Chen, “A Novel Method to Construct Frequency-Domain Gravitational Waveform for Ac- celerating Sources,” (2026), arXiv:2604.00253 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Line-of-sight acceleration in compact binaries with higher harmonics and eccentricity,

    Soumen Roy and Justin Janquart, “Line-of-sight acceleration in compact binaries with higher harmonics and eccentricity,” (2026), arXiv:2606.08838 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  23. [23]

    Joint inference of line-of-sight acceleration and or- bital eccentricity in neutron-star–black-hole binaries,

    Lorenzo Pompili, Aldo Gamboa, and Alessandra Buo- nanno, “Joint inference of line-of-sight acceleration and or- bital eccentricity in neutron-star–black-hole binaries,” (2026), arXiv:2606.28156 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Constraints on Line-of- Sight Acceleration from O1-O4,

    Labani Roy and Alexander H. Nitz, “Constraints on Line-of- Sight Acceleration from O1-O4,” (2026), arXiv:2606.25304 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    Impact of neglecting center-of-mass acceleration in parameter estimation of stellar- mass black holes,

    Suvikranth Gera and Poulami Dutta Roy, “Impact of neglecting center-of-mass acceleration in parameter estimation of stellar- mass black holes,” (2025), arXiv:2512.21979 [gr-qc]. 15

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Indication for a Compact Object Next to a LIGO–Virgo Binary Black Hole Merger,

    Shu-Cheng Yang, Wen-Biao Han, Hiromichi Tagawa, Song Li, Ye Jiang, Ping Shen, Qianyun Yun, Chen Zhang, and Xing-Yu Zhong, “Indication for a Compact Object Next to a LIGO–Virgo Binary Black Hole Merger,” Astrophys. J. Lett.988, L41 (2025), arXiv:2401.01743 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Towards gravitational wave parameter inference for binaries with an eccentric companion,

    Kai Hendriks, Lorenz Zwick, Pankaj Saini, János Takátsy, and Johan Samsing, “Towards gravitational wave parameter inference for binaries with an eccentric companion,” (2026), arXiv:2601.14918 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    On the Presence of a Tertiary Compact Object in GW190814,

    Lalit Pathak, Hemantakumar Phurailatpam, and Achamveedu Gopakumar, “On the Presence of a Tertiary Compact Object in GW190814,” (2026), arXiv:2605.21955 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    GWTC- 4.0: Tests of General Relativity. I. Overview and General Tests,

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC- 4.0: Tests of General Relativity. I. Overview and General Tests,” (2026), arXiv:2603.19019 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    GWTC- 4.0: Tests of General Relativity. II. Parameterized Tests,

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), “GWTC- 4.0: Tests of General Relativity. II. Parameterized Tests,” (2026), arXiv:2603.19020 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Pipeline to search for signatures of line-of-sight acceleration in gravitational wave signals produced by compact binary coalescences,

    Avinash Tiwari, Aditya Vijaykumar, Shasvath J. Kapadia, Shrobana Ghosh, and Alex B. Nielsen, “Pipeline to search for signatures of line-of-sight acceleration in gravitational wave signals produced by compact binary coalescences,” Phys. Rev. D (2026), 10.1103/qtw8-3g56

    work page doi:10.1103/qtw8-3g56 2026

  32. [32]

    Gravitational Wave Phase Shifts of Black Hole Mergers in AGN Disks,

    Hiromichi Tagawa, Connar Rowan, János Takátsy, Lorenz Zwick, Kai Hendriks, Wen-Biao Han, and Johan Samsing, “Gravitational Wave Phase Shifts of Black Hole Mergers in AGN Disks,” Astrophys. J.998, 244 (2026), arXiv:2511.15193 [astro- ph.HE]

    arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    The construction and use of dephasing prescriptions for environmental effects in gravita- tional wave astronomy,

    János Takátsy, Lorenz Zwick, Kai Hendriks, Pankaj Saini, Gaia Fabj, and Johan Samsing, “The construction and use of dephasing prescriptions for environmental effects in gravita- tional wave astronomy,” Class. Quant. Grav.42, 215006 (2025), arXiv:2505.09513 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Large Gravitational Wave Phase Shifts from Strong 3-body Interactions in Dense Stellar Clusters,

    Kai Hendriks, Dany Atallah, Miguel Martinez, Michael Zevin, Lorenz Zwick, Alessandro A. Trani, Pankaj Saini, János Takátsy, and Johan Samsing, “Large Gravitational Wave Phase Shifts from Strong 3-body Interactions in Dense Stellar Clusters,” (2024), arXiv:2411.08572 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    How lonely are the Bi- nary Compact Objects Detected by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration?

    Devesh Giri and Suvodip Mukherjee, “How lonely are the Bi- nary Compact Objects Detected by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration?” (2026), arXiv:2604.22441 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  36. [36]

    Accelerated binary black holes in globular clusters: forecasts and detectability in the era of space-based gravitational-wave detectors,

    Avinash Tiwari, Aditya Vijaykumar, Shasvath J. Kapadia, Gi- acomo Fragione, and Sourav Chatterjee, “Accelerated binary black holes in globular clusters: forecasts and detectability in the era of space-based gravitational-wave detectors,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527, 8586–8597 (2023), arXiv:2307.00930 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Profiling stellar environments of gravitational wave sources,

    Avinash Tiwari, Aditya Vijaykumar, Shasvath J. Kapadia, Sourav Chatterjee, and Giacomo Fragione, “Profiling stellar environments of gravitational wave sources,” Phys. Rev. D112, 084034 (2025), arXiv:2407.15117 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Profiling Dark Matter Spikes with Gravitational Waves from Accelerated Binaries,

    Avinash Tiwari, Prolay Chanda, Shasvath J. Kapadia, Susmita Adhikari, Aditya Vijaykumar, and Basudeb Dasgupta, “Profiling Dark Matter Spikes with Gravitational Waves from Accelerated Binaries,” (2025), arXiv:2508.03803 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with advanced ligo, advanced virgo and kagra,

    Benjamin P Abbott, R Abbott, TD Abbott, S Abraham, Fausto Acernese, K Ackley, C Adams, VB Adya, C Affeldt, M Agathos, et al., “Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with advanced ligo, advanced virgo and kagra,” Living reviews in relativity23, 1–69 (2020)

    2020

  40. [40]

    The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory,

    M Punturo, M Abernathy, F Acernese, B Allen, Nils Anders- son, K Arun, F Barone, B Barr, M Barsuglia, M Beker,et al., “The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory,” Classical and Quantum Gravity27, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,

    David Reitzeet al., “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,” Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,

    Pau Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    The status of DECIGO,

    Shuichi Satoet al., “The status of DECIGO,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 840, 012010 (2017)

    2017

  44. [44]

    Seager,Exoplanets(2010)

    S. Seager,Exoplanets(2010)

    2010

  45. [45]

    Comparison of post-newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detec- tors,

    Alessandra Buonanno, Bala R. Iyer, Evan Ochsner, Yi Pan, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Comparison of post-newtonian templates for compact binary inspiral signals in gravitational-wave detec- tors,” Phys. Rev. D80, 084043 (2009)

    2009

  46. [46]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: V olume 1: Theory and Experiments(OUP Oxford, 2007)

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: V olume 1: Theory and Experiments(OUP Oxford, 2007)

    2007

  47. [47]

    Murray and Stanley F

    Carl D. Murray and Stanley F. Dermott,Solar System Dynamics (1999)

    1999

  48. [48]

    Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform?

    Curt Cutler and Éanna E. Flanagan, “Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform?” Phys. Rev. D 49, 2658–2697 (1994)

    1994

  49. [49]

    Detector configuration of decigo/bbo and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries,

    Kent Yagi and Naoki Seto, “Detector configuration of decigo/bbo and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries,” Phys. Rev. D83, 044011 (2011)

    2011

  50. [50]

    Erratum: Detector configuration of decigo/bbo and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries [phys. rev. d 83, 044011 (2011)],

    Kent Yagi and Naoki Seto, “Erratum: Detector configuration of decigo/bbo and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries [phys. rev. d 83, 044011 (2011)],” Phys. Rev. D95, 109901 (2017)

    2011

  51. [51]

    The construc- tion and use of lisa sensitivity curves,

    Travis Robson, Neil J Cornish, and Chang Liu, “The construc- tion and use of lisa sensitivity curves,” Classical and Quantum Gravity36, 105011 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    Estimating spinning binary parameters and testing alternative theories of gravity with lisa,

    Emanuele Berti, Alessandra Buonanno, and Clifford M. Will, “Estimating spinning binary parameters and testing alternative theories of gravity with lisa,” Phys. Rev. D71, 084025 (2005)

    2005

  53. [53]

    Ligo document t2000012- v2,

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, “Ligo document t2000012- v2,” https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T2000012-v2/public (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    Et sensitivities,

    Einstein Telescope Collaboration , “Et sensitivities,” https: //www.et-gw.eu/etsensitivities(2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravi- tational Wave Observatories,

    S. Hildet al., “Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravi- tational Wave Observatories,” Class. Quant. Grav.28, 094013 (2011), arXiv:1012.0908 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  56. [56]

    Algebraic and machine learning approach to hierarchical triple-star stability,

    Pavan Vynatheya, Adrian S. Hamers, Rosemary A. Mardling, and Earl P. Bellinger, “Algebraic and machine learning approach to hierarchical triple-star stability,” MNRAS516, 4146–4155 (2022), arXiv:2207.03151 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Tidal interactions in star cluster simulations,

    Rosemary A. Mardling and Sverre J. Aarseth, “Tidal interactions in star cluster simulations,” MNRAS321, 398–420 (2001)

    2001

  58. [58]

    Detecting triple systems with gravitational wave observations,

    Yohai Meiron, Bence Kocsis, and Abraham Loeb, “Detecting triple systems with gravitational wave observations,” Astrophys. J.834, 200 (2017), arXiv:1604.02148 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Pulsar timing and general relativity

    D. C. Backer and R. W. Hellings, “Pulsar timing and general relativity.” ARA&A24, 537–575 (1986)

    1986

  60. [60]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmolog- ical parameters,

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmolog- ical parameters,” Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Secular dynamics in hierar- chical three-body systems,

    Smadar Naoz, Will M. Farr, Yoram Lithwick, Frederic A. Rasio, and Jean Teyssandier, “Secular dynamics in hierar- chical three-body systems,” MNRAS431, 2155–2171 (2013), arXiv:1107.2414 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    Resonant Post-Newtonian Eccentricity Excitation in Hi- erarchical Three-body Systems,

    Smadar Naoz, Bence Kocsis, Abraham Loeb, and Nicolas Yunes, “Resonant Post-Newtonian Eccentricity Excitation in Hi- erarchical Three-body Systems,” Astrophys. J.773, 187 (2013), arXiv:1206.4316 [astro-ph.SR]. 16

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [63]

    The Eccentric Kozai-Lidov Effect and Its Ap- plications,

    Smadar Naoz, “The Eccentric Kozai-Lidov Effect and Its Ap- plications,” ARA&A54, 441–489 (2016), arXiv:1601.07175 [astro-ph.EP]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precess- ing binary black holes,

    Geraint Prattenet al., “Computationally efficient models for the dominant and subdominant harmonic modes of precess- ing binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. D103, 104056 (2021), arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    LVK Algorithm Library - LALSuite,

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KA- GRA Collaboration, “LVK Algorithm Library - LALSuite,” Free software (GPL) (2018)

    2018

  66. [66]

    gwastro/pycbc: v2.3.3 release of pycbc,

    Alex Nitz, Ian Harry,et al., “gwastro/pycbc: v2.3.3 release of pycbc,” (2024)

    2024

  67. [67]

    Stellar-mass black holes in star clusters: implications for gravitational wave radiation,

    Sambaran Banerjee, Holger Baumgardt, and Pavel Kroupa, “Stellar-mass black holes in star clusters: implications for gravitational wave radiation,” MNRAS402, 371–380 (2010), arXiv:0910.3954 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  68. [68]

    Stellar-mass black holes in young massive and open stellar clusters and their role in gravitational-wave gen- eration - II,

    Sambaran Banerjee, “Stellar-mass black holes in young massive and open stellar clusters and their role in gravitational-wave gen- eration - II,” MNRAS473, 909–926 (2018), arXiv:1707.00922 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    Binary Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters: Exploring the The- oretical Uncertainties,

    Sourav Chatterjee, Carl L. Rodriguez, and Frederic A. Rasio, “Binary Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters: Exploring the The- oretical Uncertainties,” ApJ834, 68 (2017), arXiv:1603.00884 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Dynamical Formation of Low-mass Merging Black Hole Binaries like GW151226,

    Sourav Chatterjee, Carl L. Rodriguez, Vicky Kalogera, and Frederic A. Rasio, “Dynamical Formation of Low-mass Merging Black Hole Binaries like GW151226,” ApJ836, L26 (2017), arXiv:1609.06689 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Black Hole Mergers from an Evolving Population of Globular Clusters,

    Giacomo Fragione and Bence Kocsis, “Black Hole Mergers from an Evolving Population of Globular Clusters,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161103 (2018), arXiv:1806.02351 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    Post-Newtonian Dynamics in Dense Star Clusters: Highly Eccentric, Highly Spinning, and Repeated Bi- nary Black Hole Mergers,

    Carl L. Rodriguez, Pau Amaro-Seoane, Sourav Chatterjee, and Frederic A. Rasio, “Post-Newtonian Dynamics in Dense Star Clusters: Highly Eccentric, Highly Spinning, and Repeated Bi- nary Black Hole Mergers,” Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 151101 (2018), arXiv:1712.04937 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    Binary black holes in young star clusters: the impact of metallicity,

    Ugo N. Di Carlo, Michela Mapelli, Nicola Giacobbo, Mario Spera, Yann Bouffanais, Sara Rastello, Filippo Santoliquido, Mario Pasquato, Alessandro Ballone, Alessandro A. Trani, Ste- fano Torniamenti, and Francesco Haardt, “Binary black holes in young star clusters: the impact of metallicity,” MNRAS498, 495–506 (2020), arXiv:2004.09525 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Modeling Dense Star Clusters in the Milky Way and Beyond with the CMC Clus- ter Catalog,

    Kyle Kremer, Claire S. Ye, Nicholas Z. Rui, Newlin C. Weather- ford, Sourav Chatterjee, Giacomo Fragione, Carl L. Rodriguez, Mario Spera, and Frederic A. Rasio, “Modeling Dense Star Clusters in the Milky Way and Beyond with the CMC Clus- ter Catalog,” ApJS247, 48 (2020), arXiv:1911.00018 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Mass and Rate of Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in Young, Globular and Nuclear Star Clusters,

    Michela Mapelli, Filippo Santoliquido, Yann Bouffanais, Manuel Arca Arca Sedda, Maria Celeste Artale, and Alessandro Ballone, “Mass and Rate of Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in Young, Globular and Nuclear Star Clusters,” Symmetry13, 1678 (2021), arXiv:2007.15022 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Spin misalignment of black hole binaries from young star clusters: implications for the origin of gravitational waves events,

    A. A. Trani, A. Tanikawa, M. S. Fujii, N. W. C. Leigh, and J. Kumamoto, “Spin misalignment of black hole binaries from young star clusters: implications for the origin of gravitational waves events,” MNRAS504, 910–919 (2021), arXiv:2102.01689 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    Demographics of Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in Dense Star Clusters,

    Giacomo Fragione and Frederic A. Rasio, “Demographics of Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in Dense Star Clusters,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2302.11613 (2023), arXiv:2302.11613 [astro- ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Secular evolution of com- pact binaries near massive black holes: gravitational wave sources and other exotica,

    Fabio Antonini and Hagai B Perets, “Secular evolution of com- pact binaries near massive black holes: gravitational wave sources and other exotica,” The Astrophysical Journal757, 27 (2012)

    2012

  79. [79]

    Greatly Enhanced Merger Rates of Compact-object Binaries in Non-spherical Nu- clear Star Clusters,

    Cristobal Petrovich and Fabio Antonini, “Greatly Enhanced Merger Rates of Compact-object Binaries in Non-spherical Nu- clear Star Clusters,” ApJ846, 146 (2017), arXiv:1705.05848 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    Quasi- secular evolution of mildly hierarchical triple systems: analytics and applications for gw sources and hot jupiters,

    Evgeni Grishin, Hagai B Perets, and Giacomo Fragione, “Quasi- secular evolution of mildly hierarchical triple systems: analytics and applications for gw sources and hot jupiters,” Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society481, 4907–4923 (2018)

    2018

Showing first 80 references.