Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 86 references

Individual particle persistence antagonizes global ordering in populations of nematically-aligning self-propelled particles

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a lattice model of nematically aligning self-propelled particles, this paper shows that high individual persistence prevents global nematic order even under strong alignment interactions, leaving only local order.

desk verdict A clean LGCA model showing that high persistence frustrates global nematic order, but the density-independence claim is oversold and the ordered-state analysis is done off the simulated transition. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07054 v1 pith:OIFHBCM5 submitted 2025-02-10 physics.bio-ph cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.CGnlin.PS

Josué Manik Nava-Sedeño , Rainer Klages , Haralampos Hatzikirou , Andreas Deutsch This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-phcond-mat.stat-mechnlin.CGnlin.PS
keywords activematternematicorderpersistenceofmotionlattice-gascellularautomatoncollectivemean-fieldstabilityanalysisorientationalself-propelledparticles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses a lattice-gas cellular automaton (a discrete space-and-time model in which particles hop along six velocity channels on a triangular lattice) to ask how the persistence of an individual's own motion affects the collective order of a population that aligns nematically, i.e., head-to-tail rather than head-to-head. The central finding is that global nematic order only appears when particles are weakly persistent: raising the persistence parameter $\alpha$ while keeping the alignment strength $\beta$ high destroys the globally ordered nematic band state and leaves only partial, local nematic order. The paper establishes this by simulation of a 120 by 120 lattice at density $\rho = 0.2$ and by a mean-field linear stability analysis of the homogeneous state. The practical point is that population-level order is not set by interactions alone; the intrinsic movement style of the individuals can act as an independent control parameter capable of frustrating or promoting a given collective phase.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the reorientation Hamiltonian of the LGCA, written as $H = H_{\rm pers} + H_{\rm align}$, where $H_{\rm pers} = -\alpha \sum_{\ell,j} (\vec{c}_\ell \cdot \vec{c}_j) s^I_\ell s_j$ biases a particle to keep its current velocity channel and $H_{\rm align} = -\beta \sum_{\vec{r}' \in N_{\vec{r}}} \sum_{\ell,j} (\vec{c}_\ell \cdot \vec{c}_j)^2 s^I_\ell s_j^{\vec{r}'}$ biases reorientation toward the average nematic axis of neighboring nodes. The argument then proceeds through the mean-field Boltzmann propagator $\Gamma_{\ell,j}(\vec{k})$, a matrix that maps Fourier modes of perturbations under the linearized mean-field dynamics; its eigenvalues decide whether small perturbations of a steady state grow. The key relations are the instability thresholds $3\alpha\rho = 1$ for flux (polar) modes and $9\beta\rho = 1$ for nematic modes, and the finding that large $\alpha$ destabilizes the ordered nematic steady state $Q_+$. This is the mechanism by which individual persistence is shown to switch off global nematic order.

What would settle it

Run the same LGCA on a 120 by 120 lattice at densities $\rho = 0.1$ and $\rho = 0.4$ across the $(\beta, \alpha)$ parameter plane and measure the nematic order parameter $S_L$ in the stationary state; if at either density the region of high global nematic order extends to large $\alpha$, or the transition from region A to region B disappears, then persistence-frustrated ordering is not a general dilute-regime property. A cheaper check would be to fix $\beta = 4$, vary $\alpha$ at both densities, and compare where $S_L$ drops.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a two-parameter phase structure for nematically aligning self-propelled particles. In the $(\beta, \alpha)$ plane, with $\beta$ the sensitivity to nematic alignment and $\alpha$ the persistence of individual motion, four regimes appear: a disordered random-walk state at low $\beta$ and low $\alpha$; a globally ordered nematic state ($S_L \approx 1$, $S_F \approx 0$) at high $\beta$ and low $\alpha$; a polar-ordered state at low $\beta$ and high $\alpha$; and a partially ordered, frustrated state at high $\beta$ and high $\alpha$ in which nematic bands form but no global nematic order is achieved. The linear stability analysis explains the frustration: the homogeneous disordered state is destabilized by nematic modes when $9\beta\rho = 1$ and by flux/polar modes when $3\alpha\rho = 1$, where $\rho$ is density; at high $\alpha$ the nematic steady state itself develops unstable polar and nematic modes, which is exactly the persistence-induced loss of global ordering seen in simulation.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the assumption that the phase diagram measured at one density, $\rho = 0.2$ on a 120 by 120 periodic lattice, is representative of the whole dilute regime; the density-independence argument given is a linear stability result that covers only infinitesimal perturbations of the homogeneous disordered state, not the nonlinear band and cluster phases at other densities.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At fixed dilute density, increasing individual persistence can push a population from a globally nematic-ordered band state into a partially ordered state, so persistence acts as a control parameter for the degree of collective order.
  • The linear stability thresholds $3\alpha\rho = 1$ and $9\beta\rho = 1$ imply that density and interaction strength enter only through their products, so the same phase behavior should reappear if both density and coupling are rescaled in the dilute regime.
  • When both persistence and nematic sensitivity are high, the ordered nematic steady state becomes unstable in the mean-field analysis, which explains the observed transition between the globally ordered region A and the partially ordered region B.
  • The model's patterns—a single nematic band at low persistence, a network of bands at intermediate values, and polar clusters at high persistence—mimic the range of structures seen in persistent and non-persistent bacterial populations, and this structural agreement motivates the biological reading of the result.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the persistence-frustration mechanism is generic, then in engineered active materials one could toggle between global and local orientational order by changing the noise or persistence of individual agents, without changing the alignment interaction at all.
  • Editorial inference: the linear-stability density-independence argument does not by itself guarantee that the nonlinear phases (bands, clusters) are density-independent; simulating the phase diagram at two other dilute densities would be the direct test of whether the antagonism between $\alpha$ and global nematic order survives outside the homogeneous-state analysis.
  • Editorial inference: because the persistence term is built from exponentially correlated Gaussian noise, the result may not carry over to power-law or L\'evy persistent motion, which is observed in some bacteria; whether heavy-tailed persistence also frustrates nematic order is an open question the paper does not address.
  • Editorial inference: the model suggests a biological reading that the paper leaves implicit—populations that require global nematic sheets should keep their individual persistence low, whereas populations that tolerate streams and local order can be highly persistent.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a lattice-gas cellular automaton (LGCA) model of self-propelled particles with nematic alignment, incorporating an independent parameter α for individual persistence of motion and β for the strength of nematic alignment interactions. Simulations at a single density ρ=0.2 on a 120×120 periodic lattice map a phase diagram in the (β, α) plane (Fig. 3), identifying a region of global nematic order (A), a region of partial or local nematic order (B) at high persistence and high alignment, a polar-ordered region (C) at high persistence and low alignment, and a disordered region. A mean-field linear stability analysis of the homogeneous state yields threshold conditions depending on the products βρ and αρ (Eq. (13)), and a stability analysis of a homogeneous nematic steady state Q+ (Eq. (14)) suggests that large persistence destabilizes global nematic order. The authors conclude that individual persistence can frustrate global nematic ordering while allowing local order, with qualitative comparisons to experiments on Myxococcus xanthus and other systems.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper offers a minimal, analytically tractable model showing that an individual-level motility trait—persistence—can control the global spatiotemporal organization of a collectively migrating population. The clean separation of persistence and alignment into two independent control parameters is a conceptual strength, and the combination of simulation with linear stability analysis makes the paper useful for further theoretical work. The mean-field derivations are mostly transparent and reproduce known instabilities as limiting cases. The claim is falsifiable and directly testable by additional simulations at other densities and by repeating the ordered-state stability analysis at the parameters of the simulated transition.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III; Section IV, Eqs. (7) and (14)] The statement in Section III that "different densities lead to qualitatively the same stationary behavior" is supported only by the linear stability of the homogeneous state, where thresholds depend on the products βρ and αρ. This argument does not cover the ordered-state stability that controls the A→B transition, which is the central evidence for the headline claim. The stability of Q+ in Eq. (14) depends on the steady-state occupations f1 and f2, which are density-dependent solutions of Eq. (7); therefore the persistence-induced destabilization of global nematic order is not a function of αρ and βρ alone. No simulations at other densities are reported, so the claim that high persistence prevents global nematic order has not been shown to hold beyond ρ=0.2. Additional simulations at, e.g., ρ=0.1 and ρ=0.4 would directly test the density independence of the A→B transition.
  2. [Section IV, Fig. 7 vs. Fig. 4] The stability analysis of the ordered state Q+ is performed at β=0.8 (Fig. 7), whereas the simulated A→B transition in Fig. 4 is obtained at β=4. Since the ordered-state occupations f1 and f2, and hence the stability of Q+ against persistence, depend on β, the provided analysis does not directly explain the transition that it claims to explain. The authors should repeat the eigenvalue calculation at β=4 or at least show how the instability threshold in α varies with β and compare it with the simulated phase boundary.
  3. [Section IV, Eq. (13)] The mean-field derivation leading to Eq. (13) assumes a dilute system with negligible interference among reorientations at a node, but the simulated density ρ=0.2 corresponds to an average of 1.2 particles per node out of six channels. The validity of the dilute approximation at this density is not quantified. A direct comparison between the predicted instability thresholds (3αρ=1, 9βρ=1) and the first appearance of order in simulations would help establish that the linear analysis applies in the regime used for the phase diagram.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 4 caption] The caption contains a typo: "incrased persistence" should be "increased persistence".
  2. [Section V] The text states that patterns were characterized on "a square lattice", but the model is defined on a triangular (hexagonal) lattice; this is likely a typo and should be corrected.
  3. [Section V] The phrase "the five different phase transition among the four observed steady states" is unclear; the paper describes four distinct phases, not five transitions. Please revise the wording.
  4. [Fig. 3] The phase diagram in Fig. 3 does not report error bars or the number of independent simulations used to compute the order parameters; adding this information would allow the reader to judge the statistical significance of the phase boundaries.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity was found: the central persistence–nematic frustration result is established by direct simulation and by mean-field analysis derived from the model's own transition probabilities, with no fitted parameters or definitional reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—global nematic order is only possible for weakly persistent particles—is a readout of the model's own dynamics, not a restatement of an input. The LGCA transition probability in Eq. (3), with H_pers and H_align given in Eqs. (2a)–(2b), is defined independently of the order parameters S_F and S_L in Eqs. (4a)–(4b); the phase diagram in Fig. 3 is obtained by simulating these rules and measuring those order parameters, so the A/B/C ordering is an emergent measurement. The mean-field analysis in Eqs. (5)–(14) derives the stability thresholds (3αρ = 1 and 9βρ = 1) and the destabilization of the Q+ state at high persistence from the same transition probabilities, and it is checked against lattice simulations rather than fitted to them. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. [59], [61], [66]) supply the LGCA formalism and linearization technique, but the paper states the Hamiltonian and the propagator explicitly, so no load-bearing premise is imported by citation alone. The claim that behavior is density-independent for ρ = 0.2 rests on a linear-stability scaling argument and is a potential generalizability limitation, not a circular reduction of the central result to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All analytical results are derived from the model's own transition probabilities, so the ledger is dominated by modeling assumptions rather than fitted parameters. The only hand-set physical parameters are α, β, and ρ; none are fitted to experimental data. No new particles, forces, or entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • α (persistence strength) = scanned 0 to 9
    Sets the memory time of the overdamped active-Brownian-like dynamics; not fitted to data, but central to the claim that high persistence suppresses global nematic order.
  • β (nematic alignment sensitivity) = scanned 0 to 7
    Controls head-to-tail alignment with neighbors; the phase boundaries in Fig. 3 depend on it.
  • ρ (mean density) = 0.2
    Dilute regime chosen; the claim of qualitative density independence is asserted from linear stability, not from simulations at other densities.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Dilute regime and mean-field molecular chaos (Stoßzahlansatz): the automaton can be approximated by the single-particle mean-field equation fℓ(r+cℓ,τ+1) = (Σ_n f_n) Tℓ.
    Used in Section IV to derive Eqs. (5)-(6) and all subsequent instability thresholds; it neglects correlations in multi-particle reorientations at a node.
  • domain assumption Velocity persistence is represented by a single scalar α via exponentially correlated Gaussian noise, giving Hpers in Eq. (2a).
    Motivated by [61] and cell tracking, but not validated for Myxococcus xanthus reversal dynamics; if real persistence is not exponential, the mechanism could differ.
  • ad hoc to paper Nematic ordered states can be represented by f1=f4 and f2=f3=f5=f6 with the director fixed to channel 1.
    Assumed in Section IV before Eq. (8); it restricts the analysis to one director orientation and one mean-field symmetry class.
  • standard math Linear stability of homogeneous and ordered steady states, via discrete Fourier transform of the Boltzmann propagator in Eqs. (11)-(13), predicts the finite-amplitude phases observed in simulations.
    Standard technique from [66] and [59]; the inference from infinitesimal modes to nonlinear band patterns is an extrapolation.
  • domain assumption The automaton's transition probability has the Gibbs form P ∝ exp(-Hpers - Halig) with a factor δ conserving particle number.
    This defines the model rather than importing an external result, but the additive decomposition into persistence and nematic terms is a modeling assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Individual particle persistence antagonizes global ordering in populations of nematically-aligning self-propelled particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OIFHBCM5

@misc{pith2026250207054,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Individual particle persistence antagonizes global ordering in populations of nematically-aligning self-propelled particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OIFHBCM5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07054}
}
read the original abstract

The transition from individual to collective motion plays a significant role in many biological processes. While the implications of different types of particle-particle interactions for the emergence of particular modes of collective motion have been well studied, it is unclear how particular types of individual migration patterns influence collective motion. Here, motivated by swarming bacteria Myxococcus xanthus, we investigate the combined effects of the individual pattern of migration and of particle-particle interactions, on the emergence of collective migration. We analyze the effects of a feature of individual pattern migration, the persistence of motion, on the collective properties of the system that emerge from interactions among individuals; in particular, when nematic velocity alignment interaction mediates collective dynamics. We find, through computer simulations and mathematical analysis, that an initially disordered migratory state can become globally ordered by increasing either, the particle-particle alignment interaction strength or the persistence of individual migration. In contrast, we find that persistence prevents the emergence of global nematic order when both persistence and nematic alignment are comparatively high. We conclude that behavior at the population level does not only depend on interactions between individuals but also on the individuals' own intrinsic behavior.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07054 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic description of the updating process of the system configuration. Each hexagonal lattice site contains [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Top and lower left.- Simulation snapshots obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Simulation results of persistent, nematic-aligning par [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phase transition from region A to region B with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Numerical bifurcation diagram showing the steady [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Eigenvalue logarithms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Eigenvalue logarithms [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Collective motion,

    T. Vicsek and A. Zafeiris, “Collective motion,” Physics reports, vol. 517, no. 3-4, pp. 71–140, 2012

    2012

  2. [2]

    Collective motion of cells: from experiments to models,

    E. M´ ehes and T. Vicsek, “Collective motion of cells: from experiments to models,” Integrative Biology, vol. 6, pp. 831–854, 07 2014

    2014

  3. [3]

    Locust collective motion and its modeling,

    G. Ariel and A. Ayali, “Locust collective motion and its modeling,” PLOS Computational Biology, vol. 11, pp. 1– 25, 12 2015

    2015

  4. [4]

    Collective motion of bacteria in two dimen- sions,

    Y. Wu, “Collective motion of bacteria in two dimen- sions,” Quantitative Biology , vol. 3, pp. 199–205, Dec 2015

    2015

  5. [5]

    A statistical physics view of swarming bacteria,

    A. Be’er and G. Ariel, “A statistical physics view of swarming bacteria,” Movement ecology, vol. 7, pp. 1–17, 2019

    2019

  6. [6]

    Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles,

    Tam´ as Vicsek, Andr´ as Czir´ ok, Eshel Ben-Jacob, Inon Cohen, and O. Shochet, “Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles,” Physical Review Let- ters, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 1226–1229, 1995

    1995

  7. [7]

    Long-range order in a two- dimensional dynamical XY model: How birds fly to- gether,

    J. Toner and Y. Tu, “Long-range order in a two- dimensional dynamical XY model: How birds fly to- gether,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 75, pp. 4326–4329, Dec 1995

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    Flocking regimes in a simple lattice model,

    J. R. Raymond and M. R. Evans, “Flocking regimes in a simple lattice model,” Phys. Rev. E , vol. 73, p. 036112, Mar 2006

    work page 2006

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Phase transitions in systems of self- propelled agents and related network models,

    M. Aldana, V. Dossetti, C. Huepe, V. M. Kenkre, and H. Larralde, “Phase transitions in systems of self- propelled agents and related network models,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 98, p. 095702, Mar 2007

    2007

  2. [10]

    Emergence of Collective Motion in a Model of Interacting Brownian Particles,

    V. Dossetti and F. J. Sevilla, “Emergence of Collective Motion in a Model of Interacting Brownian Particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 115, p. 058301, July 2015

    2015

  3. [11]

    Disen- tangling and modeling interactions in fish with burst- and-coast swimming reveal distinct alignment and at- traction behaviors,

    D. S. Calovi, A. Litchinko, V. Lecheval, U. Lopez, A. P. Escudero, H. Chat´ e, C. Sire, and G. Theraulaz, “Disen- tangling and modeling interactions in fish with burst- and-coast swimming reveal distinct alignment and at- traction behaviors,” PLoS computational biology, vol. 1...

    2018

  4. [12]

    Pattern-formation mechanisms in motility mutants of myxococcus xanthus,

    J. Starruß, F. Peruani, V. Jakovljevic, L. Søgaard- Andersen, A. Deutsch, and M. B¨ ar, “Pattern-formation mechanisms in motility mutants of myxococcus xanthus,” Interface focus, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 774–785, 2012

    2012

  5. [13]

    The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review,

    J. Alfonso, K. Talkenberger, M. Seifert, B. Klink, A. Hawkins-Daarud, K. Swanson, H. Hatzikirou, and A. Deutsch, “The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review,” Journal of the Royal Soci- ety Interface, vol. 14, no. 136, p. 20170490, 2017

    2017

  6. [14]

    Collective inspection of reg- ular structures using a swarm of miniature robots,

    N. Correll and A. Martinoli, “Collective inspection of reg- ular structures using a swarm of miniature robots,” in Experimental Robotics IX, pp. 375–386, Springer, 2006

    2006

  7. [15]

    Smart swarms of bacteria-inspired agents with performance adaptable interactions,

    A. Shklarsh, G. Ariel, E. Schneidman, and E. Ben- Jacob, “Smart swarms of bacteria-inspired agents with performance adaptable interactions,” PLoS Comput Biol, vol. 7, no. 9, p. e1002177, 2011

    2011

  8. [16]

    The mechanics and statistics of ac- tive matter,

    S. Ramaswamy, “The mechanics and statistics of ac- tive matter,” Annu. Rev. Condes. Matter Phys. , vol. 1, pp. 323–345, 2010

    2010

  9. [17]

    Schweitzer, Brownian agents and active particles

    F. Schweitzer, Brownian agents and active particles . Berlin: Springer, 2003

    2003

  10. [18]

    Active brownian particles,

    P. Romanczuk, M. B¨ ar, W. Ebeling, B. Lindner, and L. Schimansky-Geier, “Active brownian particles,” Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. , vol. 202, pp. 1–162, 2012

    2012

  11. [19]

    Active particles in complex and crowded environments,

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, “Active particles in complex and crowded environments,” Rev. Mod. Phys. , vol. 88, p. 045006, 2016

    2016

  12. [20]

    Models of collective cell behaviour with crowding effects: comparing lattice- 10 based and lattice-free approaches,

    M. J. Plank and M. J. Simpson, “Models of collective cell behaviour with crowding effects: comparing lattice- 10 based and lattice-free approaches,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 9, no. 76, pp. 2983–2996, 2012

    2012

  13. [21]

    Phase transition in the collective mi- gration of tissue cells: experiment and model,

    B. Szabo, G. Sz¨ oll¨ osi, B. G¨ onci, Z. Jur´ anyi, D. Selmeczi, and T. Vicsek, “Phase transition in the collective mi- gration of tissue cells: experiment and model,” Physical Review E, vol. 74, no. 6, p. 061908, 2006

    2006

  14. [22]

    A mean-field the- ory for self-propelled particles interacting by velocity alignment mechanisms,

    F. Peruani, A. Deutsch, and M. B¨ ar, “A mean-field the- ory for self-propelled particles interacting by velocity alignment mechanisms,” The European Physical Journal Special Topics, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 111–122, 2008

    2008

  15. [23]

    An ele- mentary model for directed active motion,

    O. Steuernagel, W. Ebeling, and V. Calenbuhr, “An ele- mentary model for directed active motion,” Chaos, Soli- tons and Fractals, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1917–1930, 1994

    1917

  16. [24]

    Directed transport of active particles over asymmetric energy bar- riers,

    N. Koumakis, C. Maggi, and R. Di Leonardo, “Directed transport of active particles over asymmetric energy bar- riers,” Soft Matter , vol. 10, pp. 5695–5701, 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    Self-motile colloidal particles: From directed propulsion to random walk,

    J. R. Howse, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, T. Gough, R. Vafabakhsh, and R. Golestanian, “Self-motile colloidal particles: From directed propulsion to random walk,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 99, p. 048102, 2007

    2007

  18. [26]

    H. Berg, E. coli in Motion . Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Springer New York, 2008

    2008

  19. [27]

    Active Brownian particles and run-and- tumble particles separate inside a maze,

    M. Khatami, K. Wolff, O. Pohl, M. R. Ejtehadi, and H. Stark, “Active Brownian particles and run-and- tumble particles separate inside a maze,”Sci. Rep., vol. 6, pp. 1–10, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    Modeling persistence of motion in a crowded environment: The diffusive limit of excluding velocity-jump processes,

    E. Gavagnin and C. A. Yates, “Modeling persistence of motion in a crowded environment: The diffusive limit of excluding velocity-jump processes,” Physical Review E , vol. 97, no. 3, p. 032416, 2018

    2018

  21. [29]

    In- creased motility impedes clustering,

    C. G. Ray, I. Mukherjee, and P. K. Mohanty, “In- creased motility impedes clustering,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03216, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Ne- matic torques in scalar active matter: When fluctua- tions favor polar order and persistence,

    G. Spera, C. Duclut, M. Durand, and J. Tailleur, “Ne- matic torques in scalar active matter: When fluctua- tions favor polar order and persistence,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 132, p. 078301, Feb 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Dry aligning dilute active matter,

    H. Chat´ e, “Dry aligning dilute active matter,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, vol. 11, no. Volume 11, 2020, pp. 189–212, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Nonequilib- rium clustering of self-propelled rods,

    F. Peruani, A. Deutsch, and M. B¨ ar, “Nonequilib- rium clustering of self-propelled rods,” Physical Re- view E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics , vol. 74, no. 3, p. 030904, 2006

    2006

  25. [33]

    Bacte- rial swarming driven by rod shape,

    J. Starruß, F. Peruani, M. B¨ ar, and A. Deutsch, “Bacte- rial swarming driven by rod shape,”Mathematical Model- ing of Biological Systems, Volume I: Cellular Biophysics, Regulatory Networks, Development, Biomedicine, and Data Analysis, pp. 163–174, 2007

    2007

  26. [34]

    Hydrody- namics of soft active matter,

    M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liv- erpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, “Hydrody- namics of soft active matter,” Reviews of modern physics, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 1143–1189, 2013

    2013

  27. [35]

    Self-propelled rods: Insights and perspectives for active matter,

    M. B¨ ar, R. Großmann, S. Heidenreich, and F. Peruani, “Self-propelled rods: Insights and perspectives for active matter,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics , vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 441–466, 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    Spontaneous motion in hierarchically assembled active matter,

    T. Sanchez, D. T. Chen, S. J. DeCamp, M. Heymann, and Z. Dogic, “Spontaneous motion in hierarchically assembled active matter,” Nature, vol. 491, no. 7424, pp. 431–434, 2012

    2012

  29. [37]

    Active nematics,

    A. Doostmohammadi, J. Ign´ es-Mullol, J. M. Yeomans, and F. Sagu´ es, “Active nematics,” Nature communica- tions, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 3246, 2018

    2018

  30. [38]

    Interplay of structure, elasticity, and dynam- ics in actin-based nematic materials,

    R. Zhang, N. Kumar, J. L. Ross, M. L. Gardel, and J. J. De Pablo, “Interplay of structure, elasticity, and dynam- ics in actin-based nematic materials,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. E124– E133, 2018

    2018

  31. [39]

    Pattern formation and traveling waves in myxobacteria: theory and modeling,

    O. A. Igoshin, A. Mogilner, R. D. Welch, D. Kaiser, and G. Oster, “Pattern formation and traveling waves in myxobacteria: theory and modeling,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 98, no. 26, pp. 14913– 14918, 2001

    2001

  32. [40]

    Mesoscale pat- tern formation of self-propelled rods with velocity rever- sal,

    R. Großmann, F. Peruani, and M. B¨ ar, “Mesoscale pat- tern formation of self-propelled rods with velocity rever- sal,” Physical Review E , vol. 94, no. 5, p. 050602, 2016

    2016

  33. [41]

    On the mechanism of long-range orienta- tional order of fibroblasts,

    X. Li, R. Balagam, T.-F. He, P. P. Lee, O. A. Igoshin, and H. Levine, “On the mechanism of long-range orienta- tional order of fibroblasts,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 114, no. 34, pp. 8974–8979, 2017

    2017

  34. [42]

    Long-range nematic order in two-dimensional active matter,

    B. Mahault and H. Chat´ e, “Long-range nematic order in two-dimensional active matter,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 127, no. 4, p. 048003, 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    Rippling patterns in aggregates of myxobacteria arise from cell-cell collisions,

    U. B¨ orner, A. Deutsch, H. Reichenbach, and M. B¨ ar, “Rippling patterns in aggregates of myxobacteria arise from cell-cell collisions,” Physical review letters , vol. 89, no. 7, p. 078101, 2002

    2002

  36. [44]

    Large-scale chaos and fluctuations in ac- tive nematics,

    S. Ngo, A. Peshkov, I. S. Aranson, E. Bertin, F. Ginelli, and H. Chat´ e, “Large-scale chaos and fluctuations in ac- tive nematics,” Physical review letters , vol. 113, no. 3, p. 038302, 2014

    2014

  37. [45]

    Phase separation and emer- gent structures in an active nematic fluid,

    E. Putzig and A. Baskaran, “Phase separation and emer- gent structures in an active nematic fluid,” Physical Re- view E , vol. 90, no. 4, p. 042304, 2014

    2014

  38. [46]

    Dynam- ically generated patterns in dense suspensions of active filaments,

    K. Prathyusha, S. Henkes, and R. Sknepnek, “Dynam- ically generated patterns in dense suspensions of active filaments,” Physical Review E , vol. 97, no. 2, p. 022606, 2018

    2018

  39. [47]

    Vectorial active matter on the lattice: polar condensates and nematic filaments,

    J. M. Nava-Sede˜ no, H. Hatzikirou, A. Voß-B¨ ohme, L. Br- usch, A. Deutsch, and F. Peruani, “Vectorial active matter on the lattice: polar condensates and nematic filaments,” New Journal of Physics , vol. 25, no. 12, p. 123046, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    The dichotomous role of anisotropic sensing in pattern generation and disruption,

    M. d. S. Reyes-Ortiz, J. M. Nava-Sede˜ no, and A. Deutsch, “The dichotomous role of anisotropic sensing in pattern generation and disruption,” Physica A: Statistical Me- chanics and its Applications , vol. 630, p. 129261, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    Phases and correlations in active nematic granular systems,

    A. Sharma and H. Soni, “Phases and correlations in active nematic granular systems,” Soft Matter , vol. 20, no. 33, pp. 6608–6617, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Topological structure dynamics revealing collective evolution in active nematics,

    X.-q. Shi and Y.-q. Ma, “Topological structure dynamics revealing collective evolution in active nematics,” Nature communications, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 3013, 2013

    2013

  43. [51]

    Orientational order of motile defects in active nematics,

    S. J. DeCamp, G. S. Redner, A. Baskaran, M. F. Ha- gan, and Z. Dogic, “Orientational order of motile defects in active nematics,” Nature materials , vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1110–1115, 2015

    2015

  44. [52]

    Instabilities, defects, and defect ordering in an over- damped active nematic,

    E. Putzig, G. S. Redner, A. Baskaran, and A. Baskaran, “Instabilities, defects, and defect ordering in an over- damped active nematic,” Soft matter , vol. 12, no. 17, pp. 3854–3859, 2016

    2016

  45. [53]

    Dynami- cal patterns in nematic active matter on a sphere,

    S. Henkes, M. C. Marchetti, and R. Sknepnek, “Dynami- cal patterns in nematic active matter on a sphere,” Phys- ical Review E , vol. 97, no. 4, p. 042605, 2018. 11

    2018

  46. [54]

    Hydrodynamics of ac- tive defects: From order to chaos to defect ordering,

    S. Shankar and M. C. Marchetti, “Hydrodynamics of ac- tive defects: From order to chaos to defect ordering,” Physical Review X , vol. 9, no. 4, p. 041047, 2019

    2019

  47. [55]

    Understanding dense active nematics from microscopic models,

    A. Patelli, I. Djafer-Cherif, I. S. Aranson, E. Bertin, and H. Chat´ e, “Understanding dense active nematics from microscopic models,” Physical review letters , vol. 123, no. 25, p. 258001, 2019

    2019

  48. [56]

    Filamentous active matter: Band formation, bending, buckling, and defects,

    G. A. Vliegenthart, A. Ravichandran, M. Ripoll, T. Auth, and G. Gompper, “Filamentous active matter: Band formation, bending, buckling, and defects,” Science advances, vol. 6, no. 30, p. eaaw9975, 2020

    2020

  49. [57]

    Motile topologi- cal defects hinder dynamical arrest in dense liquids of ac- tive ellipsoids,

    P. Arora, A. Sood, and R. Ganapathy, “Motile topologi- cal defects hinder dynamical arrest in dense liquids of ac- tive ellipsoids,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 128, no. 17, p. 178002, 2022

    2022

  50. [58]

    Directional reversals enable myxococ- cus xanthus cells to produce collective one-dimensional streams during fruiting-body formation,

    S. Thutupalli, M. Sun, F. Bunyak, K. Palaniappan, and J. W. Shaevitz, “Directional reversals enable myxococ- cus xanthus cells to produce collective one-dimensional streams during fruiting-body formation,” Journal of The Royal Society Interface , vol. 12, no. 109, p. 20150049, 2015

    2015

  51. [59]

    Deutsch and S

    A. Deutsch and S. Dormann, Cellular automaton model- ing of biological pattern formation . Boston: Birkhauser, 2017

    2017

  52. [60]

    Anomalous diffusion and asymmetric tempering mem- ory in neutrophil chemotaxis,

    P. Dieterich, O. Lindemann, M. L. Moskopp, S. Tauzin, A. Huttenlocher, R. Klages, A. Chechkin, and A. Schwab, “Anomalous diffusion and asymmetric tempering mem- ory in neutrophil chemotaxis,” PLOS Comput. Biol. , vol. 18, pp. 1–26, 2022

    2022

  53. [61]

    Cellular automaton models for time- correlated random walks: derivation and analysis,

    J. M. Nava-Sede˜ no, H. Hatzikirou, R. Klages, and A. Deutsch, “Cellular automaton models for time- correlated random walks: derivation and analysis,” Sci- entific reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2017

    2017

  54. [62]

    Modelling collective cell motion: are on-and off-lattice models equiva- lent?,

    J. M. Nava-Sede˜ no, A. Voß-B¨ ohme, H. Hatzikirou, A. Deutsch, and F. Peruani, “Modelling collective cell motion: are on-and off-lattice models equiva- lent?,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 375, no. 1807, p. 20190378, 2020

    2020

  55. [63]

    Bio-lgca: a cellular automaton modelling class for analysing collective cell migration,

    A. Deutsch, J. M. Nava-Sede˜ no, S. Syga, and H. Hatzikirou, “Bio-lgca: a cellular automaton modelling class for analysing collective cell migration,” PLoS com- putational biology, vol. 17, no. 6, p. e1009066, 2021

    2021

  56. [64]

    Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study,

    M. Ballerini, N. Cabibbo, R. Candelier, A. Cavagna, E. Cisbani, I. Giardina, V. Lecomte, A. Orlandi, G. Parisi, A. Procaccini, M. Viale, and V. Zdravkovic, “Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field ...

    2008

  57. [65]

    Extracting cellular automaton rules from physical langevin equation models for single and col- lective cell migration,

    J. Nava-Sede˜ no, H. Hatzikirou, F. Peruani, and A. Deutsch, “Extracting cellular automaton rules from physical langevin equation models for single and col- lective cell migration,” Journal of mathematical biology , vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1075–1100, 2017

    2017

  58. [66]

    Mean- field analysis of a dynamical phase transition in a cellular automaton model for collective motion,

    H. J. Bussemaker, A. Deutsch, and E. Geigant, “Mean- field analysis of a dynamical phase transition in a cellular automaton model for collective motion,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 78, no. 26, p. 5018, 1997

    1997

  59. [67]

    Hydrodynamics of self-propelled hard rods,

    A. Baskaran and M. C. Marchetti, “Hydrodynamics of self-propelled hard rods,” Physical Review E , vol. 77, no. 1, p. 011920, 2008

    2008

  60. [68]

    Modeling active colloids: From active brownian particles to hydrodynamic and chemi- cal fields,

    A. Z¨ ottl and H. Stark, “Modeling active colloids: From active brownian particles to hydrodynamic and chemi- cal fields,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics , vol. 14, pp. 109–127, 2023

    2023

  61. [69]

    Local actin dynamics couple speed and persistence in a cellular potts model of cell mi- gration,

    I. M. Wortel, I. Niculescu, P. M. Kolijn, N. S. Gov, R. J. de Boer, and J. Textor, “Local actin dynamics couple speed and persistence in a cellular potts model of cell mi- gration,” Biophysical journal, vol. 120, no. 13, pp. 2609– 2622, 2021

    2021

  62. [70]

    Long-range nematic order and anomalous fluctuations in suspensions of swimming filamentous bacteria,

    D. Nishiguchi, K. H. Nagai, H. Chat´ e, and M. Sano, “Long-range nematic order and anomalous fluctuations in suspensions of swimming filamentous bacteria,” Phys- ical Review E , vol. 95, no. 2, p. 020601, 2017

    2017

  63. [71]

    Active nematic or- der and dynamic lane formation of microtubules driven by membrane-bound diffusing motors,

    F. L. Memarian, J. D. Lopes, F. J. Schwarzendahl, M. G. Athani, N. Sarpangala, A. Gopinathan, D. A. Beller, K. Dasbiswas, and L. S. Hirst, “Active nematic or- der and dynamic lane formation of microtubules driven by membrane-bound diffusing motors,” Proceedings of the National...

    2021

  64. [72]

    C. elegans collectively forms dynamical networks,

    T. Sugi, H. Ito, M. Nishimura, and K. H. Nagai, “C. elegans collectively forms dynamical networks,” Nature communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 683, 2019

    2019

  65. [73]

    The self-organized structure of glioma on- costreams and the disruptive role of passive cells,

    L. Barberis, C. A. Condat, S. M. Faisal, and P. R. Lowenstein, “The self-organized structure of glioma on- costreams and the disruptive role of passive cells,” Sci- entific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 25435, 2024

    2024

  66. [74]

    Instabilities and chaos in a kinetic equation for active nematics,

    X.-q. Shi, H. Chat´ e, and Y.-q. Ma, “Instabilities and chaos in a kinetic equation for active nematics,” New Journal of Physics , vol. 16, no. 3, p. 035003, 2014

    2014

  67. [75]

    Emergent behavior in active col- loids,

    A. Z¨ ottl and H. Stark, “Emergent behavior in active col- loids,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , vol. 28, no. 25, p. 253001, 2016

    2016

  68. [76]

    Complex collective dynamics of active torque-driven colloids at interfaces,

    A. Snezhko, “Complex collective dynamics of active torque-driven colloids at interfaces,” Current opinion in colloid & interface science , vol. 21, pp. 65–75, 2016

    2016

  69. [77]

    Flocking without align- ment interactions in attractive active brownian parti- cles,

    L. Caprini and H. L¨ owen, “Flocking without align- ment interactions in attractive active brownian parti- cles,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 130, no. 14, p. 148202, 2023

    2023

  70. [78]

    Criticality and the onset of ordering in the standard vicsek model,

    G. Baglietto, E. V. Albano, and J. Candia, “Criticality and the onset of ordering in the standard vicsek model,” Interface Focus, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 708–714, 2012

    2012

  71. [79]

    Cell–cell adhesion and 3d matrix confinement determine jamming transitions in breast cancer invasion,

    O. Ilina, P. G. Gritsenko, S. Syga, J. Lippoldt, C. A. La Porta, O. Chepizhko, S. Grosser, M. Vullings, G.- J. Bakker, J. Starruß, et al. , “Cell–cell adhesion and 3d matrix confinement determine jamming transitions in breast cancer invasion,” Nature cell biology, vol. 22, no....

    2020

  72. [80]

    Analysis of individual cell trajectories in lattice-gas cellular automa- ton models for migrating cell populations,

    C. Mente, A. Voss-B¨ ohme, and A. Deutsch, “Analysis of individual cell trajectories in lattice-gas cellular automa- ton models for migrating cell populations,” Bulletin of mathematical biology, vol. 77, pp. 660–697, 2015

    2015

  73. [81]

    Cell adhesion heterogeneity reinforces tumour cell dis- semination: novel insights from a mathematical model,

    D. Reher, B. Klink, A. Deutsch, and A. Voss-B¨ ohme, “Cell adhesion heterogeneity reinforces tumour cell dis- semination: novel insights from a mathematical model,” Biology direct, vol. 12, pp. 1–17, 2017

    2017

  74. [82]

    Chaotic model for l´ evy walks in swarming bacteria,

    G. Ariel, A. Be’er, and A. Reynolds, “Chaotic model for l´ evy walks in swarming bacteria,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 118, p. 228102, 2017

    2017

  75. [83]

    Emergence of l´ evy walks in systems of interacting individuals,

    S. Fedotov and N. Korabel, “Emergence of l´ evy walks in systems of interacting individuals,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 95, pp. 030107/1–6, 2017

    2017

  76. [84]

    Generalized l´ evy walks and the role of chemokines in migration of effector 12 cd8+ t cells,

    T. H. Harris, E. J. Banigan, D. A. Christian, C. Konradt, E. D. Tait Wojno, K. Norose, E. H. Wilson, B. John, W. Weninger, A. D. Luster, et al. , “Generalized l´ evy walks and the role of chemokines in migration of effector 12 cd8+ t cells,” Nature, vol. 486, no. 7404, pp. 545...

    2012

  77. [85]

    Swarming bacteria migrate by l´ evy walk,

    G. Ariel, A. Rabani, S. Benisty, J. Partridge, R. Harshey, and A. Be’er, “Swarming bacteria migrate by l´ evy walk,” Nat. Commun. , vol. 6, pp. 8396/1–6, 2015

    2015

  78. [86]

    Single-cell tracking reveals super-spreading brain cancer cells with high persistence,

    A. Nousi, M. T. Søgaard, M. Audoin, and L. Jauffred, “Single-cell tracking reveals super-spreading brain cancer cells with high persistence,” Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, vol. 28, p. 101120, 2021

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.