Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Fairness in Agentic AI: A Unified Framework for Ethical and Equitable Multi-Agent System

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.07254 v2 pith:PPCNTAVG submitted 2025-02-11 cs.MA cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.MAcs.AIcs.CY
keywords fairnessmulti-agentagentframeworkconstraintsemergentequitablesystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ensuring fairness in decentralized multi-agent systems presents significant challenges due to emergent biases, systemic inefficiencies, and conflicting agent incentives. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of fairness in multi-agent AI, introducing a novel framework where fairness is treated as a dynamic, emergent property of agent interactions. The framework integrates fairness constraints, bias mitigation strategies, and incentive mechanisms to align autonomous agent behaviors with societal values while balancing efficiency and robustness. Through empirical validation, we demonstrate that incorporating fairness constraints results in more equitable decision-making. This work bridges the gap between AI ethics and system design, offering a foundation for accountable, transparent, and socially responsible multi-agent AI systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FAIRTOPIA: Envisioning Multi-Agent Guardianship for Disrupting Unfair AI Pipelines

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FAIRTOPIA proposes a three-layer, multi-agent architecture for continuous AI fairness guardianship, but offers only a conceptual design and no validation.

  2. Safety Degradation in AI Agents

    cs.CY 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adding retrieval to aligned LLMs degrades safety: refusal rates fall, bias and harmfulness rise, and prompt-based mitigation only partially restores alignment.

Pith tools