Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 50 references

Floquet-Volkov interference in a semiconductor

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Asymmetric sideband reveals Floquet-Volkov interference in black phosphorus.

desk verdict Clean data on polarization-controlled sideband asymmetry in black phosphorus, but the paper's own neglect of in-plane Volkov coupling leaves a pure-Volkov alternative mechanism on the table. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07357 v1 pith:OFOW6NK2 submitted 2025-02-11 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics

Changhua Bao , Haoyuan Zhong , Benshu Fan , Xuanxi Cai , Fei Wang , Shaohua Zhou , Tianyun Lin , Hongyun Zhang
show 4 more authors
Pu Yu Peizhe Tang Wenhui Duan Shuyun Zhou
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics
keywords FloquetstatesVolkovblackphosphorustime-andangle-resolvedphotoemissionsidebandasymmetrypumppolarizationcontrollight-dressedelectroniccoherentinterference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports experimental evidence that the asymmetric spectral weight of the first-order light-dressed sideband in black phosphorus arises from coherent interference between Floquet states (pump-dressed Bloch electrons inside the crystal) and Volkov states (pump-dressed free electrons in the vacuum). The asymmetry reverses when the sample tilt changes sign and rotates by 90 degrees when the pump polarization is rotated, matching simulations of the interference term. The result matters because it shows Floquet-Volkov interference is not limited to Dirac materials and can be manipulated externally, offering a route to identify Floquet states in semiconductors where band-structure modification is otherwise too weak to detect.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the Floquet wavefunction of the pump-dressed Bloch electron and the Volkov wavefunction of the pump-dressed free photoelectron, coupled through the Peierls substitution. The interference is controlled by two coupling parameters: alpha, set by the out-of-plane pump field component, and beta, set by the in-plane polarization direction. In the photoemission matrix element, the relative phase between alpha and beta determines whether the sideband spectral weight is symmetric or asymmetric, and the sign of alpha (fixed by the tilt direction) selects which side of the band is brighter. This alpha-beta phase term is what converts a symmetric gourd-shaped or isotropic sideband into the observed tunable asymmetric pattern.

What would settle it

Measure the n=1 sideband asymmetry at fixed sample tilt while sweeping the pump incidence angle: Floquet-Volkov interference predicts the asymmetry follows the out-of-plane field component (flipping sign when that component reverses), whereas a tilt-induced artifact would track the crystal orientation instead.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the directional asymmetry of the n=1 sideband spectral weight, measured by time- and angle-resolved photoemission on black phosphorus, is a direct signature of Floquet-Volkov interference. A pure Floquet sideband would show a symmetric gourd-shaped pattern and a pure Volkov sideband an isotropic pattern; only their coherent superposition produces the observed strongly asymmetric distribution. Tilting the sample introduces an out-of-plane pump component and changes the relative phase between in-plane and out-of-plane light fields, flipping the asymmetry when the tilt sign is reversed. Rotating the pump polarization rotates the asymmetry direction with it. The authors support the assignment with Floquet theory calculations in which the photoemission intensity depends on two light-matter coupling parameters, one set by the out-of-plane field and one by the in-plane polarization.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that tilting the sample changes only the out-of-plane pump component and its relative phase with the in-plane field, leaving the Floquet state, the probe geometry, and the photoemission matrix elements otherwise unchanged; if the tilt also alters the measured electronic structure or introduces an asymmetric detection background, the asymmetry could occur without Floquet-Volkov interference.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Floquet-Volkov interference is shown to operate in a semiconductor with nearly parabolic bands, not just in Dirac materials.
  • The n=1 sideband spectral-weight asymmetry can serve as a diagnostic for Floquet states in non-Dirac materials where direct band-structure modification is too weak to observe.
  • The asymmetry direction is controllable by pump polarization, and its sign by sample tilt, giving an external handle on light-dressed state distribution.
  • TrARPES spectra in the presence of a strong pump must be interpreted with both Floquet and Volkov dressing in mind, since interference can redistribute spectral weight without changing band dispersion.
  • The same mechanism could inform design of laser-driven free-electron sources by shaping the angular distribution of photoemitted electrons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: The measured asymmetry as a function of tilt angle could be inverted to extract the relative phase between in-plane and out-of-plane pump components, a quantity not directly accessible otherwise.
  • Editorial inference: The same asymmetry test could be applied to other narrow-gap semiconductors or excitonic systems; the prediction would be that the asymmetry direction still tracks the pump polarization, not the crystal axes.
  • Editorial inference: A control experiment on a material with isotropic optical coupling, under the same tilt and polarization protocol, would isolate any detection-geometry contribution from the genuine interference signal.
  • Editorial inference: Because the asymmetry approaches 100% at tilt angles below 10 degrees, the effect could be used as a sensitive ultrafast switch of photoemission intensity rather than merely a spectral feature.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents time- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (TrARPES) measurements of black phosphorus (BP) under a 160 meV pump. The authors observe a first-order (n=1) sideband whose spectral weight becomes asymmetric when the sample is tilted by an angle γ, with the asymmetry reversing sign when γ changes sign and rotating by 90° when the pump polarization is rotated from s- to p-polarization. They interpret this as evidence of coherent interference between Floquet-dressed Bloch states and Volkov-dressed free-electron states. Simulations based on Floquet and Volkov wavefunctions with coupling parameters α (out-of-plane) and β (in-plane) reproduce the qualitative direction of the asymmetry. The paper claims that Floquet-Volkov interference is not restricted to Dirac materials and that its spatial signature can be controlled externally via pump polarization and tilt.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the work would be a substantial advance: it extends Floquet-Volkov interference, previously reported in topological insulators and graphene, to a conventional semiconductor with parabolic bands, and it demonstrates a practical control knob (pump polarization and sample tilt) for the interference pattern. The experimental phenomenology is clean and systematic: sign reversal with γ and rotation with polarization are captured by the model. However, the central claim is conditional on excluding alternative mechanisms, especially pure Volkov dressing of the final free-electron state, which has not been quantitatively ruled out. The paper's strengths include direct observation of the sideband asymmetry in both 1D and 2D momentum maps and a physically motivated simulation framework.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 1(g) and simulation section] The manuscript's attribution of the observed asymmetry to Floquet-Volkov interference rests on the statement that 'the above discussion is valid around the Γ point where the contribution of in-plane light-field can be neglected for Volkov states [47].' This neglect is load-bearing and is not quantitatively justified for the finite parallel momenta probed in Figs. 2 and 3. For a free-electron final state dressed by a field with both in-plane and out-of-plane components, the n=1 Volkov amplitude is proportional to k_parallel·A_parallel + p_z A_z; under k_parallel ↔ -k_parallel the first term changes sign while the second does not, so |k_parallel·A_parallel + p_z A_z|^2 is asymmetric. A pure Volkov dressing of an undressed band thus produces a left/right spectral-weight asymmetry that reverses when A_z changes sign with γ and rotates when the pump polarization is rotated, exactly the trends reported in Figs. 2 and 4. The paper provides no Volkov-only simulation or control calculation to show that the observed asymmetry requires the Floquet state. Without such a control, the central claim is not established.
  2. [Fig. 2(m) and Fig. 5] The quantitative support for the Floquet-Volkov assignment is limited. The spectral weights extracted in Fig. 2(m) are presented without error bars, and the agreement between simulation and experiment in Fig. 5 is only described qualitatively ('well reproduce the experimental asymmetric feature'). No fitted values of α and β, no comparison of the predicted γ-dependence with the measured asymmetry ratio, and no statistical measure (e.g., chi-squared) are given. Since the sign change of α with γ is the stated physical origin of the sign reversal of the asymmetry, a quantitative comparison is needed to distinguish the Floquet-Volkov model from the Volkov-only alternative.
  3. [Fig. 2(a)] The interpretation assumes that tilting the sample by γ changes only the pump light-field components and the relative phase between them, leaving the Floquet state, the probe geometry, and the photoemission matrix elements unchanged. This assumption is not defended. Tilting also changes the emission angle relative to the analyzer and can alter the detection efficiency and the final-state matrix element for the left and right branches independently. Because the asymmetry reverses with the sign of γ, a control experiment at a fixed tilt (e.g., comparing opposite emission angles) or a quantitative estimate of the matrix-element asymmetry would help rule out a geometric origin of the observed asymmetry.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. 1 caption] The paper uses both 'spectral weight' and 'spectra weight' (e.g., in the Fig. 1 caption and main text); please standardize to 'spectral weight'.
  2. [Fig. 2(m)] The definition of normalized spectral weight as IR/(IL+IR) and IL/(IL+IR) is redundant because the two quantities sum to one; a single asymmetry parameter, such as (IR-IL)/(IR+IL), would make the γ-dependence clearer.
  3. [Experimental geometry, Fig. 4] The s-pol. and p-pol. measurements were taken at different pump fluences (0.6 and 0.4 mJ/cm^2); the effect of this fluence difference on the comparison in Fig. 5 should be discussed.
  4. [References] Reference [47] is cited to justify neglecting the in-plane light-field for Volkov states near Γ, but the physical criterion for this approximation is not explained; please provide a quantitative estimate or reference to the relevant formalism.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the asymmetry sign reversal and polarization rotation follow from geometry-set model parameters, not from fitting the data.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The experimental asymmetry in the n=1 sideband is not used to set the model parameters; the simulation parameters α and β are stated to depend on the out-of-plane and in-plane pump field components, and the sign change of α under reversal of the tilt angle γ is a structural consequence of the Peierls substitution (SM Eq. 7), not a fitted value. The prediction that the asymmetry reverses with γ and rotates with pump polarization is therefore independent of the data it is compared to. Citations to the authors' prior Floquet work in black phosphorus (refs. 20, 21, 25, 26) are used to motivate the premise that Floquet states exist in this material, but those are published peer-reviewed results with their own data, so they do not reduce the present claim to a self-citation. The one load-bearing approximation — neglect of in-plane light-field for Volkov states 'valid around the Γ point' [47] — is an externally cited physical approximation; if it fails at the measured momenta, the attribution of the asymmetry to Floquet-Volkov interference would be weakened, but that is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction. No equation in the main text is equivalent by construction to the claimed conclusion; the agreement between simulation and experiment is qualitative but the sign-change prediction is not obtained by fitting the data. Verdict: no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a model that combines Floquet and Volkov wavefunctions through a coherent interference term. No new physical entities are introduced. The coupling parameters alpha and beta enter the model, but the main text does not report their values or state whether they are computed from the pump geometry or adjusted to data, so they are treated as undocumented model parameters. The interpretation also assumes that tilting the sample changes only the effective pump field components, that the prior identification of the sidebands as Floquet states in black phosphorus is correct, and that the in-plane field contribution to Volkov dressing is negligible near Gamma. If any of these assumptions fail, the observed asymmetry could have a different origin.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha (out-of-plane light-matter coupling) = not reported
    Appears in the Floquet-Volkov interference term (Eq. 7 in SM) and controls the asymmetry sign via the tilt angle. The main text does not give a numeric value or state whether it is computed from the field geometry or adjusted to data. If adjusted, it is a free parameter.
  • beta (in-plane light-matter coupling) = not reported
    Controls the pure Floquet contribution; the main text says it can be modulated by the in-plane pump polarization direction but gives no value or derivation. Its role is essential for the gourd-shaped pattern and for the interference term.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Peierls substitution describes the light-matter interaction for both Bloch electrons in the crystal and free electrons in vacuum.
    Used to write Floquet and Volkov wavefunctions in terms of alpha and beta; standard in strong-field physics but an approximation that ignores higher-order multiphoton and band-structure details.
  • domain assumption The n=1 sideband photoemission intensity is a coherent sum of Floquet and Volkov amplitudes with no significant incoherent background or decoherence.
    The interference cross term is the entire basis for the observed asymmetry; if decoherence or an unrelated background dominates, the interpretation fails.
  • domain assumption Tilting the sample by gamma changes only the out-of-plane component of the pump field and the relative phase, leaving the Floquet state, probe geometry, and photoemission matrix elements unchanged.
    The paper states the tilt 'effectively changes the pump light-field and introduces an out-of-plane light-field' but does not explicitly rule out other tilt-dependent effects.
  • domain assumption The sidebands in black phosphorus under 160 meV pumping are Floquet states as established in the authors' earlier work (Refs 20, 21, 25, 26).
    The interpretation of the n=1 sideband as a Floquet sideband relies on this prior identification, which is cited rather than re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Near the Gamma point, the in-plane light-field contribution to the Volkov dressing of free electrons can be neglected.
    This assumption, cited to Ref 47, limits the model to the region around Gamma where the measurements are analyzed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Floquet-Volkov interference in a semiconductor." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OFOW6NK2

@misc{pith2026250207357,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Floquet-Volkov interference in a semiconductor},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OFOW6NK2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07357}
}
read the original abstract

Intense light-field can dress both Bloch electrons inside crystals and photo-emitted free electrons in the vacuum, dubbed as Floquet and Volkov states respectively. These quantum states can further interfere coherently, modulating light-field dressed states. Here, we report experimental evidence of the Floquet-Volkov interference in a semiconductor - black phosphorus. A highly asymmetric modulation of the spectral weight is observed for the Floquet-Volkov states, and such asymmetry can be further controlled by rotating the pump polarization. Our work reveals the quantum interference between different light-field dressed electronic states, providing insights for material engineering on the ultrafast timescale.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07357 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) The schematic for TrARPES with pump and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) The schematic for experimental geometry and sample rotation. (b-f) TrARPES dispersion images along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) The schematic for experimental geometry with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a) The schematic for experimental geometry for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    [46] for additional information about the materials and meth- ods

    See the Supplemental Material, which includes Ref. [46] for additional information about the materials and meth- ods

    work page

  2. [1]

    The extracted spectral weight further shows that an asymmetry as high as 100% can be achieved just by tilting a small γ angle less than 10 ◦ at this energy [Fig

    are distinguished, allowing a straightforward analy- sis of the two branches. The extracted spectral weight further shows that an asymmetry as high as 100% can be achieved just by tilting a small γ angle less than 10 ◦ at this energy [Fig. 2(m), see Fig. S1,2 for more analy- sis at different energies and corresponding calculation in SM [45]], indicating t...

    work page

  3. [2]

    & Kitamura, S

    Oka, T. & Kitamura, S. Floquet engineering of quantum materials. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 387– 408 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    & Hsieh, D

    Basov, D., Averitt, R. & Hsieh, D. Towards properties on demand in quantum materials. Nat. Mater. 16, 1077– 1088 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [4]

    Weber, C. P. Ultrafast investigation and control of Dirac and Weyl semimetals. J. Appl. Phys.129, 070901 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    Rudner, M. S. & Lindner, N. H. Band structure engineer- ing and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topological insulators. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 229–244 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [6]

    & Zhou, S

    Bao, C., Tang, P., Sun, D. & Zhou, S. Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D materials and topological materials. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 33–48 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    De la Torre, A. et al. Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041002 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 50 references
  1. [8]

    Ueber einen einfluss des ultravioletten lichtes auf die electrische entladung

    Hertz, H. Ueber einen einfluss des ultravioletten lichtes auf die electrische entladung. Ann. Phys. 267, 983–1000 (1887)

  2. [9]

    & Rubio, A

    Bloch, J., Cavalleri, A., Galitski, V., Hafezi, M. & Rubio, A. Strongly correlated electron–photon systems. Nature 606, 41–48 (2022)

    2022

  3. [10]

    & Aoki, H

    Oka, T. & Aoki, H. Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 79, 081406(R) (2009)

    2009

  4. [11]

    On a heuristic point of view concerning the production and transformation of light

    Einstein, A. On a heuristic point of view concerning the production and transformation of light. Ann. Phys. 17, 132–148 (1905)

    1905

  5. [12]

    H., Refael, G

    Lindner, N. H., Refael, G. & Galitski, V. Floquet topo- logical insulator in semiconductor quantum wells. Nat. Phys. 7, 490–495 (2011)

    2011

  6. [13]

    & Demler, E

    Kitagawa, T., Oka, T., Brataas, A., Fu, L. & Demler, E. Transport properties of nonequilibrium systems under the application of light: Photoinduced quantum Hall in- sulators without Landau levels. Phys. Rev. B 84, 235108 (2011)

    2011

  7. [14]

    Sie, E. J. et al. Valley-selective optical Stark effect in monolayer WS2. Nat. Mater. 14, 290–294 (2015)

    2015

  8. [15]

    & Gedik, N

    Wang, Y., Steinberg, H., Jarillo-Herrero, P. & Gedik, N. Observation of Floquet-Bloch states on the surface of a topological insulator. Science 342, 453–457 (2013)

    2013

  9. [16]

    McIver, J. W. et al. Light-induced anomalous Hall effect 6 in graphene. Nat. Phys. 16, 38–41 (2020)

    2020

  10. [17]

    Sie, E. J. et al. Large, valley-exclusive Bloch-Siegert shift in monolayer WS2. Science 355, 1066–1069 (2017)

    2017

  11. [18]

    Aeschlimann, S. et al. Survival of Floquet–Bloch states in the presence of scattering. Nano Lett. 21, 5028–5035 (2021)

    2021

  12. [19]

    Shan, J.-Y. et al. Giant modulation of optical nonlinear- ity by Floquet engineering. Nature 600, 235–239 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    Zhou, S. et al. Pseudospin-selective Floquet band engi- neering in black phosphorus. Nature 614, 75–80 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    Park, S. et al. Steady Floquet–Andreev states in graphene Josephson junctions. Nature 603, 421–426 (2022)

    2022

  15. [22]

    Ito, S. et al. Build-up and dephasing of Floquet–Bloch bands on subcycle timescales. Nature 616, 696–701 (2023)

    2023

  16. [23]

    Zhou, S. et al. Floquet engineering of black phosphorus upon below-gap pumping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 116401 (2023)

    2023

  17. [24]

    Zhang, X. et al. Light-induced electronic polarization in antiferromagnetic Cr 2O3. Nat. Mater. 23, 790–795 (2024)

    2024

  18. [25]

    Kobayashi, Y. et al. Floquet engineering of strongly driven excitons in monolayer tungsten disulfide. Nat. Phys. 19, 171–176 (2023)

    2023

  19. [26]

    Bao, C. et al. Manipulating the symmetry of photon- dressed electronic states. Nat. Commun. 15, 10535 (2024)

    2024

  20. [27]

    Bao, C. et al. Light-induced ultrafast glide-mirror sym- metry breaking in black phosphorus. ACS Nano 18, 4c10223 (2024)

    2024

  21. [28]

    Madsen, L. B. Strong-field approximation in laser- assisted dynamics. Am. J. Phys. 73, 57–62 (2005)

    2005

  22. [29]

    Volkov, D. M. ¨Uber eine klasse von l¨ osungen der dirac- schen gleichung. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik 94, 250–260 (1935)

    1935

  23. [30]

    as well as graphene [31, 32]. In the case of black phosphorus, while the contribution of Floquet states has already been established by the Floquet band engineer- ing [20, 21, 25, 26], resolving and understanding such Floquet-Volkov interference is still quite useful, as it ca...

  24. [31]

    Park, S. T. Interference in Floquet-Volkov transitions. Phys. Rev. A 90, 013420 (2014)

    2014

  25. [32]

    Mahmood, F. et al. Selective scattering between Floquet– Bloch and Volkov states in a topological insulator. Nat. Phys. 12, 306–310 (2016)

    2016

  26. [33]

    Merboldt, M. et al. Observation of Floquet states in graphene. arXiv:2404.12791 (2024)

    2024

  27. [34]

    Choi, D. et al. Direct observation of Floquet-Bloch states in monolayer graphene. arXiv:2404.14392 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  28. [35]

    & Shen, Z.-X

    Damascelli, A., Hussain, Z. & Shen, Z.-X. Angle-resolved photoemission studies of the cuprate superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 473 (2003)

    2003

  29. [36]

    A., He, Y

    Sobota, J. A., He, Y. & Shen, Z.-X. Angle-resolved photoemission studies of quantum materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025006 (2021)

    2021

  30. [37]

    Kfir, O. et al. Controlling free electrons with optical whispering-gallery modes. Nature 582, 46–49 (2020)

    2020

  31. [38]

    Wang, K. et al. Coherent interaction between free elec- trons and a photonic cavity. Nature 582, 50–54 (2020)

    2020

  32. [39]

    & Petek, H

    Reutzel, M., Li, A., Wang, Z. & Petek, H. Coherent multidimensional photoelectron spectroscopy of ultrafast quasiparticle dressing by light. Nat. Commun. 11, 2230 (2020)

    2020

  33. [40]

    Wimmer, L. et al. Terahertz control of nanotip photoe- mission. Nat. Phys. 10, 432–436 (2014)

    2014

  34. [41]

    Green, M. E. et al. Bright and ultrafast photoelec- tron emission from aligned single-wall carbon nanotubes through multiphoton exciton resonance. Nano Lett. 19, 158–164 (2018)

    2018

  35. [42]

    Li, C. et al. Coherent ultrafast photoemission from a single quantized state of a one-dimensional emitter. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf4170 (2023)

    2023

  36. [43]

    Qiao, J., Kong, X., Hu, Z.-X., Yang, F. & Ji, W. High- mobility transport anisotropy and linear dichroism in few-layer black phosphorus. Nat. Commun. 5, 4475 (2014)

    2014

  37. [44]

    & Jia, Y

    Xia, F., Wang, H. & Jia, Y. Rediscovering black phospho- rus as an anisotropic layered material for optoelectronics and electronics. Nat. Commun. 5, 4458 (2014)

    2014

  38. [45]

    & Yang, L

    Tran, V., Soklaski, R., Liang, Y. & Yang, L. Layer- controlled band gap and anisotropic excitons in few-layer black phosphorus. Phys. Rev. B 89, 235319 (2014)

    2014

  39. [46]

    Han, C. Q. et al. Electronic structure of black phosphorus studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 90, 085101 (2014)

    2014

  40. [48]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of integrals, series, and products (Academic press, 2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Keunecke, M. et al. Electromagnetic dressing of the electron energy spectrum of Au (111) at high momenta. Phys. Rev. B 102, 161403 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Hofstadter, D. R. Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B 14, 2239–2249 (1976)

    1976

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.