Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Innovations in Nanotechnology: A Comprehensive Review of Applications Beyond Space Exploration

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This review argues that nanotechnology, first developed for space exploration, is a transformative platform for medicine, energy, and industry, with concrete gains such as nano-fiber heat shields that raise thermal conductivity from 0.55…

desk verdict The abstract promises healthcare, energy storage, environmental monitoring, and robotics, but the body is entirely space exploration—and it carries factual errors that make it untrustworthy as a reference. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08036 v2 pith:L7SAHTQN submitted 2025-02-12 physics.space-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Syed Muhammad Muslim Hussain , Batool Zehra Ladha , Muhammad Hasan Khan This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.space-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nanotechnologyspaceexplorationcarbonnanotubesnano-fiberheatshieldsnanosensorsnanoroboticsradiationshieldingliteraturereview
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a literature review whose central thesis is that nanotechnology, cultivated first for space exploration, is a broadly transformative force across materials science, healthcare, energy storage, environmental monitoring, and robotics. Its evidence is drawn mainly from space applications: nano-fiber heat shields, carbon nanotube spacecraft composites, nanomaterial radiation shielding, nanosensors, and micro/nano robots. The most concrete quantitative claim is that adding 5% nano-fibers by volume to carbon phenolic raises thermal conductivity from 0.55 to 500 W/m·K and yields 5–10% mass savings in the heat shield. The intended insight is that nanoscale engineering creates materials and devices with properties unavailable at the bulk scale, and these capabilities are portable across industries.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three application categories—spacecraft architecture, nanosensors and instrumentation, and micro/nano robotics—each populated with nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes, graphene, and boron nitride nanotubes. The quantitative centerpiece is the passive heat pipe effect in nano-fiber-reinforced carbon phenolic, in which added nano-fibers conduct heat from the hot stagnation point to cooler downstream areas, raising thermal conductivity from 0.55 to 500 W/m·K and enabling 5–10% mass savings. This mechanism does the work of showing that small material additions can produce large vehicle-level benefits.

What would settle it

Open reference [6] and check whether it actually reports the 0.55-to-500 W/m·K increase and the 5–10% mass saving at exactly 5% nano-fiber loading; if the source gives different values or a different loading, the paper's central quantitative claim loses its support. An arc-jet test on a coupon with the same formulation would settle the matter experimentally.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the review establishes that nanotechnology is a platform technology rather than a single application. It organizes the evidence into three clusters—spacecraft architecture, nanosensors and instrumentation, and micro/nano robotics—and argues that each cluster delivers measurable gains: lighter and stronger structures, higher-performance thermal protection, precise environmental sensing, radiation shielding, and miniaturized automation. The centerpiece result is the nano-fiber-reinforced carbon phenolic heat shield, where a 5% nano-fiber addition is reported to raise thermal conductivity from 0.55 to 500 W/m·K through a passive heat pipe effect and to produce 5–10% mass savings. From these space results, the paper generalizes to the claim that nanotechnology will reshape industries through interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation.

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes that its cited sources support the specific numbers it reports, above all that a 5% nano-fiber addition raises carbon phenolic thermal conductivity from 0.55 to 500 W/m·K as stated in reference [6].

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported heat-shield numbers hold, adding nano-fibers to carbon phenolic could cut thermal protection mass by 5–10% without sacrificing insulation, directly lowering launch costs.
  • Carbon nanotube composites could let spacecraft structures shed weight while retaining strength, as illustrated by composite development for the Juno spacecraft.
  • Boron nitride nanotubes enriched in 10B could become a practical neutron shield for crewed missions, exploiting the isotope's 3890-barn capture cross-section.
  • Nanosensor integration and the shift from MEMS to NEMS could make spacecraft avionics smaller, lighter, and more fault-tolerant in radiation-heavy environments.
  • Magnetically guided and bio-inspired nanorobots could perform repairs and surface exploration in places too hazardous for astronauts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The abstract's cross-industry framing suggests a technology-transfer thesis that the body does not directly argue; a follow-up review could pair each space application with a non-space use case and its own primary citations.
  • The 0.55-to-500 W/m·K jump is large enough that an independent arc-jet measurement on identically loaded coupons would be a quick experimental check of the central claim.
  • If the passive heat pipe effect generalizes, the same nano-fiber concept could be tested in terrestrial thermal protection, such as hypersonic entry vehicles or fire-resistant structural panels.
  • A reader applying these results should look for direct evidence in the healthcare, energy, and environmental sectors, since this review's detailed evidence is concentrated in space applications.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper is a literature review, arXiv:2502.08036, titled 'Innovations in Nanotechnology: A Comprehensive Review of Applications Beyond Space Exploration.' The abstract and introduction promise coverage of nanotechnology applications in healthcare, energy storage, environmental monitoring, manufacturing, and robotics, with the stated goal of moving beyond space applications. However, the body (Section II) is organized entirely around space exploration, with subsections on spacecraft architecture, nanosensors and instrumentation, and micro/nano robotics in space contexts. The review reports several specific quantitative claims, including the thermal conductivity enhancement of carbon-phenolic heat shields with nano-fibers and the neutron-capture decay scheme of boron-10, and it concludes by repeating the abstract's promises about non-space fields without providing corresponding content.

Significance. If the review were a reliable and comprehensive synthesis, it could be a useful entry point for readers seeking an overview of nanotechnology's impact across multiple industries. The paper draws on a sizable reference list from the space nanotechnology literature and touches on interesting topics such as CNT-based spacecraft composites, BNNT radiation shielding, and magnetically guided nanorobots. However, the paper's actual contribution is far narrower than its declared scope: the only substantive content covers space applications. Moreover, the review contains specific factual and self-consistency errors, notably in the neutron-capture equation and in the heat-shield thermal conductivity claim. These issues currently prevent the paper from being a trustworthy reference. The strength of the paper is its assembled bibliography; the weakness is that the presentation does not match the stated objectives.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Section II] The abstract and introduction explicitly promise coverage of healthcare, energy storage, environmental monitoring, and robotics beyond space, but the entire body (Section II, including subsections II-A, II-B, and II-C) is exclusively about space exploration. No section discusses drug delivery, batteries for terrestrial use, environmental pollutant sensing, or non-space manufacturing. The conclusion (Section III) repeats the abstract's claims without having reviewed any such applications. This is a central structural inconsistency: a reader following the title would not find the advertised content. The paper must either substantially expand the review to include non-space applications or change the title, abstract, and conclusion to honestly reflect that this is a review of space-focused nanotechnology.
  2. [Section II.A (heat shield paragraph)] The paragraph stating that adding 5% nano-fiber to carbon phenolic 'does not change the properties of the material but it shows an increase in thermal conductivity from 0.55 W/m·K to 500 W/m·K' is internally contradictory and quantitatively extraordinary. A factor-of-900 increase from a 5% filler is implausible without further structural explanation, and the sentence contradicts itself by first saying properties do not change and then reporting a dramatic change. The authors should verify the original source [6], clarify the conditions (e.g., through-plane vs in-plane conductivity, temperature dependence), and correct the sentence. As written, this claim undermines the review's quantitative reliability.
  3. [Section II.A, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) lists the gamma energy for the 10B(n,α)7Li reaction as 0.84 MeV. The standard decay scheme gives the gamma energy as approximately 0.48 MeV, with 0.84 MeV being the kinetic energy of the recoiling 7Li nucleus. The authors should correct the equation to reflect the established values: 10B + n → 4He(1.47 MeV) + 7Li(0.84 MeV) + γ(0.48 MeV). While this error does not negate the qualitative argument about boron's high neutron absorption cross-section, the quantitative statement is wrong and would mislead a reader who relies on the equation.
  4. [Section III] The conclusion states that 'this review highlights the broad impact of nanotechnology across various fields, from healthcare to energy storage and industrial automation,' but the body contains no such sections. This is not merely a stylistic issue; it reflects the absence of the promised content. The conclusion must be rewritten to accurately summarize only what the body actually covers, or the body must be expanded to justify the conclusion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Affiliation and general text] There is a typo in the affiliation: 'Uniersity' should be 'University'. Also, 'Habib Uniersity' appears in both the first and third author affiliations.
  2. [Section II.C] The text says 'surface tunnelling microscope' when it should be 'scanning tunnelling microscope,' and '35 Zenon atoms' should be '35 xenon atoms.' These are simple terminology and spelling errors.
  3. [Section II (introduction)] The sentence says the literature review 'can be divided into the following four applications' but then lists only three items (Spacecraft Architecture, Nanosensors & Instrumentation, Micro/Nano Robotics). Either a fourth item is missing or the number should be changed to three.
  4. [Section I and reference list] Several in-text citations appear out of numerical order; for example, reference [15] is cited before reference [13] in Section I. The reference numbering should be rechecked so that citations appear in coherent order, or the style should be consistent with the journal's requirements.
  5. [Figure captions] The captions for Figure 3 ('IBM written using atom nanomanipulation') and Figure 4 ('A vision of a bio nanorobotic organism') are vague; they could be expanded to describe the relevant context and source, improving readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a literature review that derives nothing and makes no prediction from fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

This manuscript is a survey-style literature review with no derivation chain, no fitted parameters, and no original predictive claim whose output is defined in terms of its input. The quantitative statement about 5% nano-fiber raising carbon-phenolic thermal conductivity from 0.55 to 500 W/m·K is attributed to reference [6] and is a citation of external experimental literature, not a result derived within this paper; likewise the mass-savings estimate is reported from the same source. The authors do not cite their own prior work, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' earlier publications. The paper's most notable defect is a mismatch between the title/abstract (which promise healthcare, energy storage, environmental monitoring, and robotics applications beyond space) and the body (which focuses entirely on space exploration). That is an internal-consistency or completeness problem, not circular reasoning: the abstract's claims about breadth are not supported by the reviewed content, but no argument assumes its own conclusion. Because the paper makes no derivation or prediction, none of the enumerated circularity patterns apply, and the honest finding is score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new parameters, entities, or mathematical apparatus. Its content is entirely drawn from cited prior work. The main risks are misrepresentation of that work and the unexplained scope restriction.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The cited references accurately support the stated numerical and qualitative claims.
    The review makes explicit quantitative claims, such as the heat shield thermal conductivity increase in Section II.A and the nuclear reaction in Eq. (1), presenting them as coming from the literature. The paper itself provides no verification, and several appear misstated, so this assumption is load-bearing.
  • ad hoc to paper The reviewed application areas are representative of the broader field of nanotechnology.
    The title promises applications beyond space exploration, but the body primarily covers space topics. No selection criteria are given, so the representativeness of the surveyed material is assumed without support.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Innovations in Nanotechnology: A Comprehensive Review of Applications Beyond Space Exploration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L7SAHTQN

@misc{pith2026250208036,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Innovations in Nanotechnology: A Comprehensive Review of Applications Beyond Space Exploration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L7SAHTQN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08036}
}
read the original abstract

Nanotechnology has emerged as a transformative force across multiple industries, enhancing materials, improving instrumentation precision, and developing intelligent systems. This review explores various nanotechnology applications, including advancements in materials science, healthcare, energy storage, environmental monitoring, and robotics. Nanomaterials, such as carbon nanotubes and graphene, offer significant improvements in fields like energy generation and medicine, while nanosensors revolutionize environmental and industrial monitoring. Micro and nano robots provide automation solutions across industries. By expanding beyond space exploration, this review highlights the far-reaching potential of nanotechnology to reshape industries through interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08036 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Space environmental hazards: space radiation and micrometeoroids. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. IBM written using atom nanomanipulation [48] and a report by the National Nanotechnology Initiative Workshop [37]. Robotic devices able to perform tasks at the nanoscale (i.e., scale of a nanometer) are called “NanoRobots.” The field of nanorobotics studies the design, manufacturing, programming, and control of nanorobotic systems [49]. [48] discusses the specific contributions of nanotechnology to space robotics, h… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. A vision of a bio nanorobotic organism [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A Networked TerraXplorers (NTXp) tems. By manually or automatically adjusting the position or orientation of a magnet, a translatory or rotational movement of MagRobots can be triggered. Direct utilization of portable magnet provides an easy-to-operate way to drive the…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    Nanostructured thermal protection systems for space exploration missions,

    J. Arnold, Y . Chen, T. Squire, D. Srivastava, G. Allen Jr, M. Stackpoole, H. Goldstein, E. Venkatapathy, and M. Loomis, “Nanostructured thermal protection systems for space exploration missions,” in 2nd International Planetary Probe Workshop , 2005

    work page 2005

  2. [1]

    Nanobots and europa, teaching nanotechnology via futuristic space exploration,

    B. Lane, M. Brackin, T. Lott, A. Frederiksen, C. S. Merritt, T. Stewart, and T. J. Manning, “Nanobots and europa, teaching nanotechnology via futuristic space exploration,” Chemical Educator , vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [2]

    Nanotechnology: An overview for space applications,

    H. Benaroya, “Nanotechnology: An overview for space applications,” Space 2002 and Robotics 2002 , pp. 1–7, 2002

    work page 2002

  4. [3]

    Nanoengineered thrusters for the next giant leap in space exploration,

    P. C. Lozano, B. L. Wardle, P. Moloney, and S. Rawal, “Nanoengineered thrusters for the next giant leap in space exploration,” Mrs Bulletin , vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 842–849, 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [4]

    Micro/nanotechnology for micro/nano/picosatellites,

    S. Janson, “Micro/nanotechnology for micro/nano/picosatellites,” in AIAA Space 2003 Conference & Exposition , 2003, p. 6269

    work page 2003

  6. [5]

    Nanomaterials in space: Technology innovation and economic trends,

    T. Scalia and L. Bonventre, “Nanomaterials in space: Technology innovation and economic trends,” Advances in Astronautics Science and Technology, vol. 3, pp. 145–155, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Potential and prospec- tive implementation of carbon nanotubes on next generation aircraft and space vehicles: A review of current and expected applications in aerospace sciences,

    O. Gohardani, M. C. Elola, and C. Elizetxea, “Potential and prospec- tive implementation of carbon nanotubes on next generation aircraft and space vehicles: A review of current and expected applications in aerospace sciences,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences , vol. 70, pp. 42– 68, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Thermal, radiation and impact protective shields (trips) for robotic and human space exploration missions,

    M. Loomis and J. Arnold, “Thermal, radiation and impact protective shields (trips) for robotic and human space exploration missions,” in 2nd International Planetary Probe Workshop , 2005

    work page 2005

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Molecular nanotechnology in aerospace: 1999,

    A. Globus, “Molecular nanotechnology in aerospace: 1999,” in Space 2000, 2000, pp. 502–529

    1999

  2. [10]

    Carbon-based nanomaterials and skin: an overview,

    A. Dalla Colletta, M. Pelin, S. Sosa, L. Fusco, M. Prato, and A. Tubaro, “Carbon-based nanomaterials and skin: an overview,” Carbon, vol. 196, pp. 683–698, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    Cvd nano-coating of carbon composites for space materials atomic oxygen shielding,

    A. Delfini, A. Vricella, R. B. Morles, R. Pastore, D. Micheli, F. Guglier- metti, and M. Marchetti, “Cvd nano-coating of carbon composites for space materials atomic oxygen shielding,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 3, pp. 208–216, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Hyper-interspersed nano/mems-architecture design for new concepts in miniature robotics for space exploration,

    S. Santoli, “Hyper-interspersed nano/mems-architecture design for new concepts in miniature robotics for space exploration,” Acta astronautica, vol. 44, no. 2-4, pp. 117–122, 1999

    1999

  5. [13]

    Engineered nanomaterials in aerospace,

    S. Arepalli and P. Moloney, “Engineered nanomaterials in aerospace,” MRS Bulletin , vol. 40, no. 10, p. 804–811, 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    Development of carbon nanotube-based composite for spacecraft components,

    S. Rawal, J. Brantley, and N. Karabudak, “Development of carbon nanotube-based composite for spacecraft components,” in 2013 6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), 2013, pp. 13–19

    2013

  7. [15]

    Structural polymer-based carbon nanotube composite fibers: Understanding the processing–structure–performance relationship,

    K. Song, Y . Zhang, J. Meng, E. C. Green, N. Tajaddod, H. Li, and M. L. Minus, “Structural polymer-based carbon nanotube composite fibers: Understanding the processing–structure–performance relationship,” Ma- terials, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 2543–2577, 2013

    2013

  8. [16]

    Hyper-interspersed nano/mems-architecture design for new concepts in miniature robotics for space exploration,

    S. Santoli, “Hyper-interspersed nano/mems-architecture design for new concepts in miniature robotics for space exploration,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 117–122, 1999, missions to the Outer Solar System and Beyond. [Online]. Available: https: //www.sciencedirect.com...

    1999

  9. [17]

    Review on nanocomposites based on aerospace applications,

    A. Bhat, S. Budholiya, S. Aravind Raj, M. T. H. Sultan, D. Hui, A. U. Md Shah, and S. N. A. Safri, “Review on nanocomposites based on aerospace applications,” Nanotechnology Reviews , vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 237–253, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Engineered nanomaterials in aerospace,

    S. Arepalli and P. Moloney, “Engineered nanomaterials in aerospace,” MRS Bulletin , vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 804–811, 2015

    2015

  11. [19]

    Electric propulsion: Systems analysis and potential application in space exploration

    S. Patel, B. M. S. Rose, and A. Inapanury, “Electric propulsion: Systems analysis and potential application in space exploration.”

  12. [20]

    Electric propulsion system for electric vehicular technology: A review,

    L. Kumar and S. Jain, “Electric propulsion system for electric vehicular technology: A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , vol. 29, pp. 924–940, 2014

    2014

  13. [21]

    Recent progress and perspectives of space electric propulsion systems based on smart nanomaterials,

    I. Levchenko, S. Xu, G. Teel, D. Mariotti, M. Walker, and M. Keidar, “Recent progress and perspectives of space electric propulsion systems based on smart nanomaterials,” Nature communications , vol. 9, no. 1, p. 879, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Polymer nanostructured materials for propulsion systems,

    J. H. Koo, L. A. Pilato, and G. E. Wissler, “Polymer nanostructured materials for propulsion systems,” Journal of spacecraft and rockets , vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1250–1262, 2007

    2007

  15. [23]

    Scalable flat-panel nanopar- ticle mems/nems propulsion technology for space exploration in the 21 st century

    A. Gallimore, B. Gilchrist, and M. Keidar, “Scalable flat-panel nanopar- ticle mems/nems propulsion technology for space exploration in the 21 st century.”

  16. [24]

    Carbon nanocomposites in aerospace technology: A way to protect low-orbit satellites,

    J. Weerasinghe, K. Prasad, J. Mathew, E. Trifoni, O. Baranov, I. Levchenko, and K. Bazaka, “Carbon nanocomposites in aerospace technology: A way to protect low-orbit satellites,” Nanomaterials, vol. 13, no. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/ 2079-4991/13/11/1763

    2023

  17. [25]

    Exploring graphene and graphene/nanoparticles as fillers to enhance atomic oxygen corrosion resistance of polyimide films,

    Y . Zhao, Z. Shen, and X. Zhang, “Exploring graphene and graphene/nanoparticles as fillers to enhance atomic oxygen corrosion resistance of polyimide films,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem- ical and Engineering Aspects , vol. 629, p. 127398, 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Atomic-oxygen- durable and electrically-conductive cnt-poss-polyimide flexible films for space applications,

    N. Atar, E. Grossman, I. Gouzman, A. Bolker, V . J. Murray, B. C. Marshall, M. Qian, T. K. Minton, and Y . Hanein, “Atomic-oxygen- durable and electrically-conductive cnt-poss-polyimide flexible films for space applications,” ACS applied materials & interfaces , vol. 7, no. 22...

    2015

  19. [27]

    Nanomaterials for radiation shielding,

    S. A. Thibeault, J. H. Kang, G. Sauti, C. Park, C. C. Fay, and G. C. King, “Nanomaterials for radiation shielding,” MRS Bulletin , vol. 40, no. 10, p. 836–841, 2015

    2015

  20. [28]

    Nanotechnology enabled radioprotectants to reduce space radiation-induced reactive oxidative species,

    B. Babu, S. Pawar, A. Mittal, E. Kolanthai, C. J. Neal, M. Coathup, and S. Seal, “Nanotechnology enabled radioprotectants to reduce space radiation-induced reactive oxidative species,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, vol. 15, no. 5, p. e1896, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Boron nitride-based nanomateri- als for radiation shielding: a review,

    E. Cheraghi, S. Chen, and J. T. Yeow, “Boron nitride-based nanomateri- als for radiation shielding: a review,” IEEE Nanotechnology Magazine , vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 8–17, 2021

    2021

  22. [30]

    Nanotechnology to nanomanufacturing: Emerg- ing models,

    N. Kumar and S. Seal, “Nanotechnology to nanomanufacturing: Emerg- ing models,” Nanotechnology, vol. 4, no. 3, 2015

    2015

  23. [31]

    Nanomate- rials for renewable energy production and storage,

    X. Chen, C. Li, M. Gr ¨atzel, R. Kostecki, and S. S. Mao, “Nanomate- rials for renewable energy production and storage,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 41, no. 23, pp. 7909–7937, 2012

    2012

  24. [32]

    Nanomaterials for energy conversion and storage,

    Q. Zhang, E. Uchaker, S. L. Candelaria, and G. Cao, “Nanomaterials for energy conversion and storage,” Chemical Society Reviews , vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 3127–3171, 2013

    2013

  25. [33]

    Potential impacts of nanotechnology on energy transmission applications and needs

    D. Elcock, “Potential impacts of nanotechnology on energy transmission applications and needs.” Argonne National Lab.(ANL), Argonne, IL (United States), Tech. Rep., 2007

    2007

  26. [34]

    Flexible solar cells based on carbon nanomaterials,

    X. Fu, L. Xu, J. Li, X. Sun, and H. Peng, “Flexible solar cells based on carbon nanomaterials,” Carbon, vol. 139, pp. 1063–1073, 2018

    2018

  27. [35]

    Carbon nanomaterials for advanced lithium sulfur batteries,

    Z.-L. Xu, J.-K. Kim, and K. Kang, “Carbon nanomaterials for advanced lithium sulfur batteries,” Nano Today, vol. 19, pp. 84–107, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Manufacturing lightweight carbon nanotube electrical cables: increasing the conductivity,

    V . Stolojan and S. G. King, “Manufacturing lightweight carbon nanotube electrical cables: increasing the conductivity,” Impact, vol. 2018, no. 5, pp. 30–32, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Nanotechnology in space exploration: Report of the national nanotechnology initiative workshop held in palo alto, california on 24-26 august 2004,

    N. N. C. O. A. V A, “Nanotechnology in space exploration: Report of the national nanotechnology initiative workshop held in palo alto, california on 24-26 august 2004,” 2006

    2004

  30. [38]

    The development of micro/nano chemical sensor systems for aerospace applications,

    G. W. Hunter, J. C. Xu, L. Evans, A. Biaggi-Labiosa, B. J. Ward, S. Rowe, D. B. Makel, C. C. Liu, P. Dutta, G. M. Berger, and R. L. V . Wal, “The development of micro/nano chemical sensor systems for aerospace applications,” in Micro- and Nanotechnology Sensors, Systems, and A...

    2010 doi

  31. [39]

    Assessment of nanosystems for space applications,

    L. Bilhaut and L. Duraffourg, “Assessment of nanosystems for space applications,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 65, no. 9-10, pp. 1272–1283, 2009

    2009

  32. [40]

    Nanoelectronics and nanosensors for space exploration,

    M. Meyyappan, J. E. Koehne, and J.-W. Han, “Nanoelectronics and nanosensors for space exploration,” MRS Bulletin , vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 822–828, 2015

    2015

  33. [41]

    Harsh environment microtechnologies for nasa and terrestrial applications,

    T. George, K. Son, R. Powers, L. Del Castillo, and R. Okojie, “Harsh environment microtechnologies for nasa and terrestrial applications,” in SENSORS, 2005 IEEE , 2005, pp. 6 pp.–

    2005

  34. [42]

    Reviewing the state of biosensors and lab-on-a-chip technologies: opportunities for extreme environments and space exploration,

    S. Cinti, S. Singh, G. Covone, L. Tonietti, A. Ricciardelli, A. Cordone, R. Iacono, A. Mazzoli, M. Moracci, A. Rotundi et al. , “Reviewing the state of biosensors and lab-on-a-chip technologies: opportunities for extreme environments and space exploration,”Frontiers in Microbi...

    2023

  35. [43]

    Systems analysis of carbon nanotubes: opportunities and challenges for space applications,

    J. A. Samareh and E. J. Siochi, “Systems analysis of carbon nanotubes: opportunities and challenges for space applications,” Nanotechnology, vol. 28, no. 37, p. 372001, aug 2017. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aa7c5a

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    Nanotechnology in space explo- ration - a review,

    P. Sankpal, V . Patil, and S. Chaganti, “Nanotechnology in space explo- ration - a review,” International Journal of Advanced Research , vol. 8, pp. 47–56, 07 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Nanostructured materials: basic concepts and microstruc- ture,

    H. Gleiter, “Nanostructured materials: basic concepts and microstruc- ture,” Acta materialia , vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2000

    2000

  38. [46]

    Instrumentation for planetary exploration,

    E. F. Klonicki-Ference, M. J. Malaska, M. P. Panning, S. E. Waller, and P. J. Gasda, “Instrumentation for planetary exploration,” in Handbook of Space Resources . Springer, 2023, pp. 277–306

    2023

  39. [47]

    Micromechanical devices at jpl for space exploration,

    W. C. Tang, “Micromechanical devices at jpl for space exploration,” in 1998 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 98TH8339) , vol. 1. IEEE, 1998, pp. 461–470

    1998

  40. [48]

    Papadopoulos, I

    E. Papadopoulos, I. Paraskevas, and T. Flessa, Miniaturization and Micro/Nanotechnology in Space Robotics . Springer New York, 2013

    2013

  41. [49]

    Nanorobotics: past, present, and future,

    C. Mavroidis and A. Ferreira, “Nanorobotics: past, present, and future,” in Nanorobotics: current approaches and techniques . Springer, 2012, pp. 3–27

    2012

  42. [50]

    Positioning single atoms with a scanning tunnelling microscope,

    D. M. Eigler and E. K. Schweizer, “Positioning single atoms with a scanning tunnelling microscope,” Nature, vol. 344, no. 6266, pp. 524– 526, 1990

    1990

  43. [51]

    3-d nanorobotic manipulation of nanometer-scale objects,

    L. Dong, “3-d nanorobotic manipulation of nanometer-scale objects,” J. of Robotics and Mechatronics , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1146–1153, 2001

    2001

  44. [52]

    Assembly of nanodevices with carbon nanotubes through nanorobotic manipulations,

    T. Fukuda, F. Arai, and L. Dong, “Assembly of nanodevices with carbon nanotubes through nanorobotic manipulations,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 1803–1818, 2003

    2003

  45. [53]

    Nanorobotic systems,

    ——, “Nanorobotic systems,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems , vol. 2, no. 3, p. 28, 2005

    2005

  46. [54]

    Miniaturization and micro/nanotechnology in space robotics,

    E. Papadopoulos, I. Paraskevas, and T. Flessa, “Miniaturization and micro/nanotechnology in space robotics,” in Nanorobotics: Current Approaches and Techniques . Springer, 2012, pp. 69–92

    2012

  47. [55]

    Understanding space: an introduction to astronautics,

    J. J. Sellers and W. J. Astore, “Understanding space: an introduction to astronautics,” (No Title), 2005

    2005

  48. [56]

    Magnetically driven micro and nanorobots,

    H. Zhou, C. C. Mayorga-Martinez, S. Pan ´e, L. Zhang, and M. Pumera, “Magnetically driven micro and nanorobots,” Chemical Reviews , vol. 121, no. 8, pp. 4999–5041, 2021

    2021

  49. [57]

    Menon, M

    C. Menon, M. Murphy, M. Sitti, and N. Lan, Space exploration-towards bio-inspired climbing robots . INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2007

    2007

  50. [58]

    Viral protein linear (vpl) nano-actuators,

    A. Dubey, C. Mavroidis, A. Thornton, K. Nikitczuk, and M. Yarmush, “Viral protein linear (vpl) nano-actuators,” in 2003 Third IEEE Con- ference on Nanotechnology, 2003. IEEE-NANO 2003. , vol. 1. IEEE, 2003, pp. 140–143

    2003

  51. [59]

    Dynamics and kinematics of viral protein linear nano-actuators for bio-nano robotic systems,

    A. Dubey, G. Sharma, C. Mavroidis, S.-M. Tomassone, K. Nikitczuk, and M. L. Yarmush, “Dynamics and kinematics of viral protein linear nano-actuators for bio-nano robotic systems,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA’04. 2004, vo...

    2004

  52. [60]

    Space bionanorobotic systems: design and applications,

    C. Mavroidis and A. Ummat, “Space bionanorobotic systems: design and applications,” in 2005 NASA/DoD Conference on Evolvable Hardware (EH’05). IEEE, 2005, pp. 193–202

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.