Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 104 references

New Models of Jupiter's Magnetopause and Bow Shock through the Juno Prime Mission: Probabilistic Location, Shape, and Internally-driven Variation

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read New Bayesian fits place both of Jupiter's outer boundaries closer to the planet than prior models.

desk verdict A credible empirical update of Jupiter's boundary models with a new asymmetric form and Bayesian MCMC, but the claimed polar flattening and dawn-dusk asymmetry are not significant given the uncertainties, and the 'closer to Jupiter' conclusion is only partially robust to the soft-bound likelihood choice. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09186 v2 pith:FGUH6FIU submitted 2025-02-13 physics.space-ph astro-ph.EP

M. J. Rutala , C. M. Jackman , C. K. Louis , A. R. Azari , F. Bagenal , S. P. Joy , W. S. Kurth , T. B. Keebler
show 4 more authors
R. S. Giles R. W. Ebert C. F. Bowers M. F. Vogt
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.space-phastro-ph.EP
keywords JupitermagnetospheremagnetopausebowshockBayesianinferenceMarkovchainMonteCarlosolarwinddynamicpressureJunomissionpolarflattening
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that Jupiter's outer magnetic boundaries—the magnetopause, where solar wind pressure balances the planet's magnetic field, and the bow shock, where that wind first slows—are systematically smaller, more polar-flattened, and more dawn-dusk asymmetric than the leading 2002 models suggest. Using boundary crossings from the Ulysses, Galileo, Cassini, and Juno spacecraft together with an ensemble estimate of the upstream solar wind, the authors fit a new functional form through Bayesian MCMC inference that uses every spacecraft position, not just the crossing instants. At median solar-wind pressure they place the magnetopause subsolar standoff at $71\pm24\,R_J$ and the bow shock at $75\pm25\,R_J$, with the magnetopause flattened by $13\pm42\%$ and inflated on the dusk side. If correct, the result shrinks the estimated volume of Jupiter's magnetosphere, widens the expected magnetosheath dwell time for Juno to about 19% of each extended-mission orbit, and sharpens the question of how much of Jupiter's behavior is internally driven.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the boundary-shape function in Equation (2), a modified S97* surface: $r_b = r_{SS}\,(2/(1+\cos\theta))^{\alpha_f} + r_b'$, with $r_{SS}=r_0\,p_{SW}^{r_1}$ ($r_1=-0.25$), $\alpha_f=\alpha_0+\alpha_1\,p_{SW}$, and $r_b'=\sin^2(\theta/2)\,\sin^2(\phi)\,p_{SW}^{r_1}$ multiplied by a separate coefficient $r_2$ on the dusk side and $r_3$ on the dawn side. The $\sin^2$ factors make the perturbation vanish at the subsolar point and at the poles, so polar flattening and dawn-dusk asymmetry are controlled by just two parameters while the surface remains continuous in three dimensions. Estimation is carried by an empirical Bayesian MCMC likelihood that treats boundary location as sampled at ten-minute cadence between soft upper and lower bounds, so all spacecraft trajectory data contribute information rather than only the instantaneous crossings, and solar-wind pressure enters as a skewed distribution rather than a point value.

What would settle it

Compile Juno's actual magnetopause and bow-shock crossing distances and timings during extended-mission orbits 35–69 together with contemporaneous upstream solar-wind pressure; if the crossings imply a median subsolar standoff well above roughly $90\,R_J$ at $p_{SW}=0.071$ nPa, or if Juno's measured magnetosheath and solar-wind residence fractions come in far below the predicted 19% and 4% per orbit, the closer-to-Jupiter claim fails. A second check is tailward shape: a boundary crossing beyond $x_{JSS}\approx-90\,R_J$ that requires a widening tail would refute the narrowing-tail result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that both of Jupiter's boundaries are best described by a modified S97* surface whose subsolar standoff scales as $r_{SS}=r_0\,p_{SW}^{-0.25}$, whose flaring depends linearly on solar-wind dynamic pressure, and which carries a separable perturbation $r_b'=\sin^2(\theta/2)\,\sin^2(\phi)\,p_{SW}^{-0.25}$ that inflates or deflates the dawn and dusk flanks independently. Fitting that form to 369 magnetopause and 229 bow-shock crossings plus trajectory residence information, the authors find median-pressure standoffs $r_{SS,MP}=71\pm24\,R_J$ and $r_{SS,BS}=75\pm25\,R_J$, magnetopause polar flattening $f_{polar}=13\pm42\%$, a dawn-to-dusk ratio of $0.93\pm0.41$ (dusk inflated), a largely axisymmetric bow shock, and a magnetotail cross-section that narrows downtail at low pressure. Both surfaces lie closer to Jupiter than the earlier 2002 reference model, and applied to Juno's extended-mission ephemerides the model predicts roughly 19% of each orbit in the magnetosheath and about 4% in the solar wind from perijove 64 onward.

Load-bearing premise

The fitting assumes the true magnetopause and bow shock belong to the particular family of surfaces in Equation (2), with a fixed $-1/4$ power law in solar-wind pressure for the whole surface and a dawn-dusk perturbation shaped as a product of two sines; if the real boundaries respond to local time or pressure in a way that family cannot express, the reported sizes, flattening, and asymmetries would be artifacts of the assumed shape.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At median solar-wind pressure the subsolar standoff moves inward to $71\pm24\,R_J$ for the magnetopause and $75\pm25\,R_J$ for the bow shock, shrinking Jupiter's estimated magnetospheric volume relative to the 2002 reference model.
  • Juno should spend about 19% of each extended-mission orbit in the magnetosheath and about 4% in the solar wind starting from perijove 64, rising to roughly 22% magnetosheath and 6% solar wind by orbit 69.
  • The magnetopause is polar-flattened at $f_{polar}=13\pm42\%$ and dusk-inflated with a dawn-to-dusk ratio of $0.93\pm0.41$, while the bow shock is effectively axisymmetric.
  • The magnetotail cross-section narrows downtail at low solar-wind pressure and only widens above roughly $p_{SW}=0.2$ nPa, which the authors interpret as possible reconnection-driven pressure release in the tail.
  • Both models are valid only within their data coverage, $x_{JSS}>-90\,R_J$ for the magnetopause and $x_{JSS}>-600\,R_J$ for the bow shock, so the tailward narrowing should not be extrapolated beyond those limits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If these models hold, published distances for Jupiter's magnetospheric size distribution, solar-wind coupling rates, and auroral compression responses may need to be re-scaled inward, with internal plasma pressure playing a relatively larger role.
  • A testable extension is to apply the same separable boundary perturbation and Bayesian fitting framework to Saturn or giant exoplanets, asking whether dusk inflation and polar flattening scale with internal plasma content.
  • Because the model includes only solar-wind dynamic pressure, adding interplanetary magnetic-field orientation or upstream Mach number in the same framework could reveal whether part of the dawn-dusk asymmetry is externally driven, a question the present data cannot separate.
  • The Juno residence predictions are a built-in near-term test: actual crossing statistics through the extended mission can be compared against the 19% and 4% fractions and used to update the posteriors before later Jupiter missions arrive.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents new empirical models of Jupiter's magnetopause and bow shock derived from Ulysses, Galileo, Cassini, and Juno boundary crossing lists, solar wind dynamic pressure from the MMESH meta-model, and a Bayesian MCMC fit. The authors introduce a modified Shue et al. (1997) functional form with polar and dawn-dusk perturbations (Eq. 2), compare it to an axisymmetric S97* form and to the Joy et al. (2002) model using LOO/WAIC weights and crossing-distance ratios, and apply the best model to estimate Juno's extended-mission dwell times in the magnetosphere, magnetosheath, and solar wind. The headline results are that both boundaries lie closer to Jupiter than J02, that the magnetopause has polar flattening of ~13% and a dusk-inflated dawn-dusk ratio of ~0.93, and that Juno will spend ~19% of each orbit in the magnetosheath and ~4% in the solar wind.

Significance. If the conclusions are robust, the paper would provide a useful community reference model with publicly available code (Rutala, 2025a) and would extend Joy et al. (2002) by using all trajectory intervals rather than crossings alone. The MMESH solar wind input is independently calibrated and the MCMC implementation with LOO/WAIC comparison is a methodological strength. However, the quantitative headline claims are not yet established: the inferred asymmetries are consistent with zero at the 1-sigma level, and the closer-to-Jupiter standoff distances appear to depend on the treatment of the non-crossing interval likelihood and an arbitrary 20% padding factor rather than on a clear improvement in crossing-data fit. For these reasons the contribution is promising but needs substantive revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [4.1-4.2, Eq. (5)] The likelihood for the ~500,000 non-crossing trajectory samples is not written down explicitly. The text introduces robs_b as a uniform distribution over the padded S97* envelope, and the implementation implied by the text assigns a flat density 1/(U_upper - U_lower) to any model boundary inside the envelope and zero outside, rather than the normal likelihood in Eq. (5). This makes the posterior standoff distance controlled by the arbitrary 20% padding and by the S97* envelope family, not by the crossing data. The crossing-based R statistics in Tables 3 and 5 do not favor the new model over S97* (magnetopause median R 1.07 vs. 1.06; bow shock 1.42 vs. 1.40), and the LOO/WAIC margin is small (54.2/57.5% vs. 45.8/42.5%). The reported r0 = 33.5 RJ for the new magnetopause is 4.5 RJ below the S97* value of 38.0 RJ, and because r2 and r3 are positive, this inward shift is required to keep the inflated flanks inside the S97* envelope. The authors should state the exact interval likelihood, explain why a model just inside the envelope is as probable as one near its center, and provide a sensitivity analysis to the padding factor (e.g., 10% and 40%) and to the envelope functional form. Without this, the headline 'closer to Jupiter' conclusion is not established.
  2. [Abstract and Section 5.1] The abstract calls the polar flattening and dawn-dusk asymmetry 'significant,' but the reported values do not support that wording. The magnetopause flattening is fpolar = 13 ± 42% (or ±47% in Section 5.1) and the dawn-dusk ratio is 0.93 ± 0.41; the bow shock flattening is 2+25/-52% and its dawn-dusk ratio is 1.1 ± 0.44. All of these intervals include zero and the opposite sign, so the data are consistent with no asymmetry or with asymmetry of either sign. Please report the posterior probability that fpolar > 0 and that the dawn-dusk ratio differs from 1, and either soften the claims or demonstrate significance with a formal posterior probability statement.
  3. [Section 4.2, J02 comparison] The J02 model is used with its original 2002 coefficients and is not refit to the present dataset, because the authors find that their interval likelihood cannot constrain the elliptical J02 form. The 'closer than previous models' claim is therefore a comparison against an untrained reference model. The authors should either refit J02 in a way that is feasible (e.g., with a proper interval likelihood or by conditioning on MHD simulations as in the original work) or explicitly qualify the headline as 'closer than the published J02 model.' This is particularly important because the R distributions show J02 overestimates the crossing distances, so part of the difference is expected, but the magnitude of the new-model shift is controlled by the envelope construction.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 5 and Figure 8 captions] The sentence defining R says both 'R > 1 represents model underestimation' and 'R > 1 represents model overestimation'; the second should be 'R < 1 represents model overestimation.'
  2. [Section 3.1] 'Pioneers 11 and 12' should be 'Pioneers 10 and 11'; Pioneer 12 does not exist as a Jupiter flyby.
  3. [Section 5.1 vs Abstract/Conclusions] The magnetopause polar flattening is reported as fpolar = 13 ± 47% in Section 5.1 but as 13 ± 42% in the Abstract and Conclusions; please make these values consistent.
  4. [Abstract vs Section 6] The Abstract says Juno will spend ~19% of each orbit in the magnetosheath and ~4% in the solar wind 'starting from PJ64,' while Section 6 and Figure 10 describe values that grow to ~22% and ~6% by orbit 69; please clarify whether the abstract refers to an average over orbits 35-69 or to a specific epoch.
  5. [Equation (2)] The perturbation term r'_b includes r1, but r1 is fixed to -0.25 throughout; writing p_SW^{-0.25} directly would avoid confusion.
  6. [Table 4] There is a stray period in '12.4 ± 0.8.'; also, the model label 'S97' is sometimes written without the asterisk, which should be made consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the boundary fits, solar-wind input, and forward dwell-time calculations are empirically grounded and not equivalent to their inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a Bayesian fit of parametric boundary shapes (Equations 1 and 2) to spacecraft crossing locations plus trajectory interval constraints, with solar wind dynamic pressure supplied by MMESH. The parameters in Tables 2 and 4 are estimated from data, not defined in terms of the headline conclusions. The 'closer to Jupiter' result is a posterior consequence of the fitted r0 values (33.5 RJ magnetopause, 36.4 RJ bow shock), which are far below the prior mean of 40 with a broad gamma prior; this indicates the data, rather than a prior identity, moved the posterior. The Juno magnetosheath/solar-wind dwell-time fractions are forward calculations from the fitted model and Juno ephemerides; the paper explicitly invites comparison with future Juno crossing measurements, so these are not fitted quantities relabeled as predictions. MMESH is a self-citation (Rutala et al., 2024), but it is independently validated against in-situ Ulysses and Juno solar wind data (Appendix A), and its code and outputs are publicly available; therefore it is real evidence rather than load-bearing circular self-citation. The padded S97* envelope used to define soft trajectory bounds is a modeling constraint, not a result that is later claimed as a prediction; even if the 20% padding or uniform soft-bound likelihood biases the inferred standoff distances, that is a statistical robustness concern, not a definitional reduction of the output to the input. No equation in the manuscript sets a fitted parameter equal to a data-derived bound, and no cited uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the chosen functional form. The new model is openly introduced as an ansatz in Equation (2), and its relative merit is assessed against S97* and J02 using LOO/WAIC and crossing-ratio statistics. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and empirical, with no circular step that converts inputs into predictions by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 15 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new physical entities. Its contributions are a new empirical functional form and a set of fitted parameters. The central claim rests on the assumed shape family, the MMESH solar wind pressure model, the fixed pressure exponent, the chosen likelihood, and the arbitrary soft-bound construction, all of which are modeling assumptions rather than independently measured inputs.

free parameters (15)
  • r0 (magnetopause) = 33.5 RJ
    Subsolar standoff distance at pSW = 1 nPa; inferred in Table 2.
  • r2 (magnetopause) = 12.9 RJ
    Dawn flank perturbation coefficient in Equation (2), Table 2.
  • r3 (magnetopause) = 25.8 RJ
    Dusk flank perturbation coefficient in Equation (2), Table 2.
  • alpha0 (magnetopause) = 0.19
    Flaring offset in Equation (2), Table 2.
  • alpha1 (magnetopause) = 1.27
    Flaring pressure dependence in Equation (2), Table 2.
  • sigma_m (magnetopause) = 0.15
    Fractional uncertainty parameter in Equation (6), Table 2.
  • sigma_b (magnetopause) = 16.8 RJ
    Constant uncertainty parameter in Equation (6), Table 2.
  • r0 (bow shock) = 36.4 RJ
    Subsolar standoff distance at pSW = 1 nPa; inferred in Table 4.
  • r2 (bow shock) = 0.0 RJ
    Dawn flank perturbation coefficient in Equation (2), Table 4.
  • r3 (bow shock) = 9.9 RJ
    Dusk flank perturbation coefficient in Equation (2), Table 4.
  • alpha0 (bow shock) = 0.89
    Flaring offset in Equation (2), Table 4.
  • alpha1 (bow shock) = 0.88
    Flaring pressure dependence in Equation (2), Table 4.
  • sigma_m (bow shock) = 0.20
    Fractional uncertainty parameter in Equation (6), Table 4.
  • sigma_b (bow shock) = 13.3 RJ
    Constant uncertainty parameter in Equation (6), Table 4.
  • Soft-bound padding factor = 20%
    Arbitrary padding added to the S97-derived upper/lower bounds in Section 4.1; affects the prior range for boundary locations.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The boundary shape is captured by Equation (2), a modified Shue et al. (1997) form with separable dawn/dusk and polar terms.
    Section 3.3: the model family is assumed to span the true boundary shapes; if the real shape is not in this family, fitted parameters are biased.
  • domain assumption The solar wind dynamic pressure at Jupiter is well-estimated by the MMESH ensemble, with uncertainty represented by skew-normal distributions.
    Section 3.2 and Appendix A: the entire pressure response is built on this modeled input, not on in-situ pSW for most times.
  • domain assumption The subsolar standoff distance scales as pSW^-1/4 (r1 = -0.25 fixed).
    Section 3.3: this exponent is held constant based on prior literature rather than fitted to the current data.
  • ad hoc to paper The likelihood is normal with sigma = sigma_b + sigma_m * r_model.
    Section 4.2, Equations (5) and (6): this particular functional form for the error is chosen, not derived from the data generation process.
  • ad hoc to paper The upper and lower bounds on the boundary location, built from S97* fits to the same crossings and padded by 20%, contain the true boundary.
    Section 4.1: these soft bounds are treated as data and directly influence the posterior; the 20% padding is an arbitrary choice.
  • domain assumption The boundary crossing lists from the four missions are accurate and complete.
    Section 3.1: all models rely on these hand-compiled crossing catalogs; a missed or misclassified crossing would propagate into the fit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New Models of Jupiter's Magnetopause and Bow Shock through the Juno Prime Mission: Probabilistic Location, Shape, and Internally-driven Variation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FGUH6FIU

@misc{pith2026250209186,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New Models of Jupiter's Magnetopause and Bow Shock through the Juno Prime Mission: Probabilistic Location, Shape, and Internally-driven Variation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FGUH6FIU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09186}
}
abstract

The interaction between Jupiter's magnetosphere and the solar wind is not well-constrained: while internal energetic plasma processes are thought to dominate plasma circulation, the solar wind nonetheless exerts significant control over the shape and scale of the whole structure. To better constrain this interaction, we derive new functional forms for Jupiter's magnetopause and bow shock using data from the $Ulysses$, Galileo, Cassini, and Juno missions and calibrated solar wind estimates from the Multi-Model Ensemble System for the Heliosphere (MMESH). We design an empirical Bayesian model to estimate the locations of the boundaries using a Markov-chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, expanding our model to sample all times, not only boundary crossing events. The boundary surfaces which best describe the data are thus estimated without the need for a full, physics-based magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) treatment of the Jovian magnetosphere and the additional assumptions required for such. The new magnetopause model exhibits significant polar flattening and dawn-dusk asymmetry, and includes a narrowing of the magnetotail when compared to previous models. The new bow shock model is largely axisymmetric. Both boundary models describe surfaces which lie closer to Jupiter than previous models, which has important implications for the modern picture of Jupiter's dynamic magnetosphere and the expected science results of current and upcoming Jupiter-bound spacecraft. Applying these models to Juno's trajectory, we estimate that the spacecraft should be expected to spend ${\sim}19\%$ of each orbit in the magnetosheath and ${\sim}4\%$ of each orbit in the solar wind starting from Perijove 64 (PJ64, 21 July 2021).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.09186 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Residence plots showing the fraction of time spent in each magnetospheric region by all spacecraft, combined. The first column (panels a-c) shows this fraction as a function of local solar time (LST) and includes all data within ±50 RJ of the zJSS=0 (equatorial) plane; the second column (panels d-f) shows this fraction as a function of meridional angle (positive coun￾terclockwise from North toward dawn in the xJSS=0… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the sun-oriented “spherical-solar” coordinate system implemented here relative to the Jupiter-de-Spun-Sun (JSS) coordinate system. Points in this spherical-solar coordinate system are defined by the coordinates (r, θ, ϕ): r is the distance from the center of Jupiter ((xJSS, yJSS, zJSS) = (0, 0, 0)); θ is an angle measured from +xJSS (i.e., roughly from the sub-solar point) back toward the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Orbital trajectories of the spacecraft used here (Ulysses, Galileo, Cassini, and Juno, as labeled) in the xJSS−ρJSS plane, with inward (blue “x”s) and outward (purple “o”s) boundary crossings marked; whether the spacecraft is outside (solid lines) or inside (dashed lines) the boundary, or if the location is not clear based on the crossing data (no line), is also demon￾strated. Panels (a, c) include all bow shock and… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Demonstrations and comparison of each Jovian magnetopause shape model tested. The (a-b) unchanged J02 form, (c-d) S97* form, and (e-f) new form for magnetopause boundary are illustrated as labeled: the first column (a, c, e) shows how the polar regions (solid lines), d…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distributions of the ratio R = rb,data/rb,model for measured-to-modeled magne￾topause locations from spacecraft crossing data to the modeled locations, for each model tested here, presented as (a) kernel density estimates and (b) rugplots. R-distributions of different …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The median best-fit model of the Jovian magnetopause, as described in the text. Panels (a), (c), and (d) show the magnetopause in the zJSS = const., yJSS = const., and xJSS = const. planes, respectively; slices of the magnetopause corresponding to different constant va…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Summary views of each bow shock shape model tested, in the same form as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Distributions of the ratio R = rb,data/rb,model in the same format as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The median best-fit model of the Jovian bow shock, as described in the text, in the same format as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Plots describing how the new boundary models compare to J02 with respect to the Juno extended mission, beginning with orbit 35 (21 July 2021). For both the new model (solid lines) and the J02 model (dashed lines), the (a) magnetopause and (b) bow shock forms are shown…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    apacite url apacite =6pt Acknowledgments. 6pt 1sp \@dates Received \@recvdate\@empty\@rcvaccrule \@recvdate \@revisedate\@empty ; revised \@revisedate; \@accptdate\@empty \@revisedate\@empty; accepted \@accptdate \@pubdate\@empty. ; published \@pubdate. -2pt \@authaddrs @list\@empty =.15in @list 1sp @list =9pt plus 2pt minus 6pt \@sluginfo width 4pc =3000...

    2001

  2. [2]

    gc" journal option for G-Cubed Nov 3, 2003 M Kelly, fixed noindent in subsubsubsection titles and for all sections in rog option Oct 2, 2003 M Kelly, added

    \@ifstar \@figbox \@figbox \@figbox#1#2#3 to !#1! #3 [#1][c] !#2!#3 \@tempdima#2 \@tempdima by2 \@tempdima by- \@tempdima by- \@height\@tempdima\@depth\@tempdima\@width @ to @ #3 Bib ??? ??? ??? =0 =0 = @figure=0 @table=0 #1 --#1 -24pt -2ex #1 0= #1 to 0 #1 I NDEX T ERMS: #1 #1 Citation: #1 Feb 9, 2009 Changed name and references to name from agu2001 to a...

    arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    , Kurth, W S

    Gurnett1992 APACrefauthors Gurnett, D A. , Kurth, W S. , Shaw, R R. , Roux, A. , Gendrin, R. , Kennel, C F. Shawhan, S D. APACrefauthors \ 1992 05 . The Galileo Plasma Wave Investigation The Galileo Plasma wave investigation . Space Science Reviews 60 1-4 341--355 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/BF00216861 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00216861 1992

  4. [4]

    APACrefauthors \ 2010

    Joy2010 APACrefauthors Joy, S P. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . \ The Jovian Magnetosheath: Factors Influencing the Size, Shape, and Mirror Mode Content and Distribution The jovian magnetosheath: Factors influencing the size, shape, and mirror mode content and distribution \ . \ Los Angeles University of California

    2010

  5. [5]

    , Khurana, K K

    Kivelson1992 APACrefauthors Kivelson, M G. , Khurana, K K. , Means, J D. , Russell, C T. \ Snare, R C. APACrefauthors \ 1992 05 . The Galileo Magnetic Field Investigation The Galileo magnetic field investigation . Space Science Reviews 60 1-4 357--383 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/BF00216862 APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00216862 1992

  6. [6]

    , Gurnett, D A

    Kurth2002 APACrefauthors Kurth, W S. , Gurnett, D A. , Hospodarsky, G B. , Farrell, W M. , Roux, A. , Dougherty, M K. Alexander, C J. APACrefauthors \ 2002 02 . The Dusk Flank of Jupiter 's Magnetosphere The dusk flank of Jupiter 's magnetosphere . Nature 415 6875 991--994 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1038/415991a APACrefDOI

    work page doi:10.1038/415991a 2002

  7. [7]

    , Andreani, V

    Abril-Pla2023 APACrefauthors Abril-Pla , O. , Andreani, V. , Carroll, C. , Dong, L. , Fonnesbeck, C J. , Kochurov, M. Zinkov, R. APACrefauthors \ 2023 09 . PyMC : A Modern, and Comprehensive Probabilistic Programming Framework in Python PyMC : A modern, and comprehensive probabilistic programming framework in Python . PeerJ Computer Science 9 e1516 . APAC...

    doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1516 2023

  8. [8]

    , Arridge, C S

    Achilleos2008 APACrefauthors Achilleos, N. , Arridge, C S. , Bertucci, C. , Jackman, C M. , Dougherty, M K. , Khurana, K K. \ Russell, C T. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Large-Scale Dynamics of Saturn's Magnetopause: Observations by Cassini Large-scale dynamics of saturn's magnetopause: Observations by cassini . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 11...

    work page doi:10.1029/2008ja013265 2008

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    , Dougherty, M K

    Achilleos2004 APACrefauthors Achilleos, N. , Dougherty, M K. , Young, D T. \ Crary, F. APACrefauthors \ 2004 09 . Magnetic Signatures of Jupiter 's Bow Shock during the Cassini Flyby Magnetic signatures of Jupiter 's bow shock during the Cassini flyby . Journal of Geophysical ...

    2004 doi

  2. [10]

    , Cl \'e ment, N

    AlSaati2022 APACrefauthors Al Saati, S. , Cl \'e ment, N. , Louis, C. , Blanc, M. , Wang, Y. , Andr \'e , N. Mauk, B. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Magnetosphere-Ionosphere-Thermosphere Coupling Study at Jupiter Based on Juno's First 30 Orbits and Modeling Tools Magnetosphere-ionosp...

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    , Achilleos, N

    Arridge2006 APACrefauthors Arridge, C S. , Achilleos, N. , Dougherty, M K. , Khurana, K K. \ Russell, C T. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Modeling the Size and Shape of Saturn 's Magnetopause with Variable Dynamic Pressure Modeling the size and shape of Saturn 's magnetopause with va...

    2006 doi

  4. [12]

    \ Sullivan, J D

    Bagenal1981 APACrefauthors Bagenal, F. \ Sullivan, J D. APACrefauthors \ 1981 09 . Direct Plasma Measurements in the Io Torus and Inner Magnetosphere of Jupiter Direct plasma measurements in the Io torus and inner magnetosphere of Jupiter . Journal of Geophysical Research: Spa...

    1981 doi

  5. [13]

    , Barraclough, B L

    Bame1992 APACrefauthors Bame, S J. , Barraclough, B L. , Feldman, W C. , Gisler, G R. , Gosling, J T. , McComas, D J. Neugebauer, M. APACrefauthors \ 1992 09 . Jupiter's Magnetosphere: Plasma Description from the Ulysses Flyby Jupiter's magnetosphere: Plasma description from t...

    1992

  6. [14]

    \ Owens, M

    Barnard2022 APACrefauthors Barnard, L. \ Owens, M. APACrefauthors \ 2022 10 . HUXt --- An Open Source, Computationally Efficient Reduced-Physics Solar Wind Model, Written in Python HUXt --- An open source, computationally efficient reduced-physics solar wind model, written in ...

    2022

  7. [15]

    \ Price, Mr

    Bayes1763 APACrefauthors Bayes, Mr . \ Price, Mr . APACrefauthors \ 1763 01 . An Essay towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances. By the Late Rev. Mr . Bayes , F . R . S . Communicated by Mr. Price , in a Letter to John Canton, a. M . F . R . S . An essay towards so...

  8. [16]

    , Yao, Z

    Bonfond2020 APACrefauthors Bonfond, B. , Yao, Z. \ Grodent, D. APACrefauthors \ 2020 11 . Six Pieces of Evidence Against the Corotation Enforcement Theory to Explain the Main Aurora at Jupiter Six Pieces of Evidence Against the Corotation Enforcement Theory to Explain the Main...

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    , Yao, Z H

    Bonfond2021 APACrefauthors Bonfond, B. , Yao, Z H. , Gladstone, G R. , Grodent, D. , G \'e rard, J C. , Matar, J. Bolton, S J. APACrefauthors \ 2021 03 . Are Dawn Storms Jupiter 's Auroral Substorms ? Are Dawn Storms Jupiter 's Auroral Substorms ? AGU Advances 2 1 e00275 . APA...

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    , Saur, J

    Chane2017 APACrefauthors Chan \'e , E. , Saur, J. , Keppens, R. \ Poedts, S. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . How Is the Jovian Main Auroral Emission Affected by the Solar Wind? How is the Jovian main auroral emission affected by the solar wind? Journal of Geophysical Research: Space P...

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    , Saur, J

    Chane2013 APACrefauthors Chan \'e , E. , Saur, J. \ Poedts, S. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Modeling Jupiter 's Magnetosphere: Influence of the Internal Sources Modeling Jupiter 's magnetosphere: Influence of the internal sources . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 118...

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    , Gruesbeck, J R

    Collier2020 APACrefauthors Collier, M R. , Gruesbeck, J R. , Connerney, J E P. , Joy, S P. , Hospodarsky, G B. , Roberts, A. Roelof, E C. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . A K-Means Clustering Analysis of the Jovian and Terrestrial Magnetopauses: A Technique to Classify Global Magnetosp...

    2020

  13. [21]

    , Acuna, M H

    Connerney1981_model APACrefauthors Connerney, J E P. , Acuna, M H. \ Ness, N F. APACrefauthors \ 1981 09 . Modeling the Jovian Current Sheet and Inner Magnetosphere Modeling the Jovian current sheet and inner magnetosphere . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 86 A1...

    1981 doi

  14. [22]

    , Badman, S V

    Cowley2008_comment APACrefauthors Cowley, S W H. , Badman, S V. , Imber, S M. \ Milan, S E. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Comment on `` Jupiter : A Fundamentally Different Magnetospheric Interaction with the Solar Wind'' by D . J . McComas and F . Bagenal Comment on `` Jupiter : A f...

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    \ Bunce, E J

    Cowley2001 APACrefauthors Cowley, S W H. \ Bunce, E J. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . Origin of the Main Auroral Oval in Jupiter 's Coupled Magnetosphere--Ionosphere System Origin of the main auroral oval in Jupiter 's coupled magnetosphere--ionosphere system . Planetary and Space Sc...

    2001 doi

  16. [24]

    , Bunce, E J

    Cowley2003_polar APACrefauthors Cowley, S W H. , Bunce, E J. , Stallard, T S. \ Miller, S. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Jupiter's Polar Ionospheric Flows: Theoretical Interpretation Jupiter's polar ionospheric flows: Theoretical interpretation . Geophysical Research Letters 30 5 . ...

    2003 doi

  17. [25]

    \ Bagenal, F

    Delamere2010 APACrefauthors Delamere, P A. \ Bagenal, F. APACrefauthors \ 2010 10 . Solar Wind Interaction with Jupiter 's Magnetosphere Solar wind interaction with Jupiter 's magnetosphere . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 115 A10201 A10201 . APACrefDOI doi:10...

    2010 doi

  18. [26]

    , Bodisch, K M

    Dougherty2017 APACrefauthors Dougherty, L P. , Bodisch, K M. \ Bagenal, F. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Survey of Voyager Plasma Science Ions at Jupiter : 2. Heavy Ions Survey of Voyager plasma science ions at Jupiter : 2. Heavy ions . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics...

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    APACrefauthors \ 1961 01

    Dungey1961 APACrefauthors Dungey, J W. APACrefauthors \ 1961 01 . Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones Interplanetary magnetic field and the auroral zones . Physical Review Letters 6 2 47--48 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.6.47 APACrefDOI

    1961 doi

  20. [28]

    , Bagenal, F

    Ebert2014 APACrefauthors Ebert, R W. , Bagenal, F. , McComas, D. \ Fowler, C. APACrefauthors \ 2014 09 . A Survey of Solar Wind Conditions at 5 AU : A Tool for Interpreting Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interactions at Jupiter A survey of solar wind conditions at 5 AU : A tool for ...

    2014

  21. [29]

    , McComas, D J

    Ebert2010 APACrefauthors Ebert, R W. , McComas, D J. , Bagenal, F. \ Elliott, H A. APACrefauthors \ 2010 12 . Location, Structure, and Motion of Jupiter 's Dusk Magnetospheric Boundary from 1625 to 2550 R J Location, structure, and motion of Jupiter 's dusk magnetospheric boun...

    2010 doi

  22. [30]

    \ Beard, D B

    Engle1980 APACrefauthors Engle, I M. \ Beard, D B. APACrefauthors \ 1980 . Idealized Jovian Magnetosphere Shape and Field Idealized Jovian magnetosphere shape and field . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 85 A2 579--592 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JA085iA02p00579 APACrefDOI

    1980 doi

  23. [31]

    , Zhang, B

    Feng2023 APACrefauthors Feng, E. , Zhang, B. , Yao, Z. , Delamere, P A. , Zheng, Z. , Dunn, W R. \ Ye, S Y. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Variation of the Jovian Magnetopause under Constant Solar Wind Conditions: Significance of Magnetodisc Dynamics Variation of the jovian magnetopa...

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    , Budnik, E

    Genot2021 APACrefauthors G \'e not, V. , Budnik, E. , Jacquey, C. , Bouchemit, M. , Renard, B. , Dufourg, N. Cabrolie, F. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Automated Multi-Dataset Analysis ( AMDA ): An on-Line Database and Analysis Tool for Heliospheric and Planetary Plasma Data Automat...

    2021

  25. [33]

    APACrefauthors \ 2015 09

    Hathaway2015 APACrefauthors Hathaway, D H. APACrefauthors \ 2015 09 . The Solar Cycle The Solar Cycle . Living Reviews in Solar Physics 12 1 4 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/lrsp-2015-4 APACrefDOI

    2015 doi

  26. [34]

    APACrefauthors \ 1979 11

    Hill1979 APACrefauthors Hill, T W. APACrefauthors \ 1979 11 . Inertial Limit on Corotation Inertial limit on corotation . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 84 A11 6554--6558 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JA084iA11p06554 APACrefDOI

    1979 doi

  27. [35]

    APACrefauthors \ 2001

    Hill2001 APACrefauthors Hill, T W. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . The Jovian Auroral Oval The Jovian auroral oval . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 106 A5 8101--8107 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/2000JA000302 APACrefDOI

    2001 doi

  28. [36]

    , Dessler, A J

    Hill1974 APACrefauthors Hill, T W. , Dessler, A J. \ Michel, F C. APACrefauthors \ 1974 . Configuration of the Jovian Magnetosphere Configuration of the Jovian magnetosphere . Geophysical Research Letters 1 1 3--6 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/GL001i001p00003 APACrefDOI

    1974 doi

  29. [37]

    \ Gelman, A

    Hoffman2014 APACrefauthors Hoffman, M D. \ Gelman, A. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . The No-u-Turn Sampler: Adaptively Setting Path Lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo The no-u-turn sampler: Adaptively setting path lengths in hamiltonian monte carlo . Journal of Machine Learning Resea...

    2014

  30. [38]

    , Kurth, W S

    Hospodarsky2017 APACrefauthors Hospodarsky, G B. , Kurth, W S. , Bolton, S J. , Allegrini, F. , Clark, G B. , Connerney, J E P. Valek, P W. APACrefauthors \ 2017 05 . Jovian Bow Shock and Magnetopause Encounters by the Juno Spacecraft Jovian bow shock and magnetopause encounte...

    2017 doi

  31. [39]

    , Russell, C T

    Huddleston1998b APACrefauthors Huddleston, D E. , Russell, C T. , Kivelson, M G. , Khurana, K K. \ Bennett, L. APACrefauthors \ 1998 1 . Location and Shape of the Jovian Magnetopause and Bow Shock Location and shape of the Jovian magnetopause and bow shock . Journal of Geophys...

    1998 doi

  32. [40]

    , Russell, C T

    Huddleston1998a APACrefauthors Huddleston, D E. , Russell, C T. , Kivelson, M G. , Khurana, K K. \ Bennett, L. APACrefauthors \ 1998 2 01 . The Location of the Jovian Bow Shock and Magnetopause: Galileo Initial Results The location of the jovian bow shock and magnetopause: Gal...

    1998 doi

  33. [41]

    , Bagenal, F

    Huscher2021 APACrefauthors Huscher, E. , Bagenal, F. , Wilson, R J. , Allegrini, F. , Ebert, R W. , Valek, P W. Levin, S M. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Survey of Juno Observations in Jupiter 's Plasma Disk : Density Survey of Juno Observations in Jupiter 's Plasma Disk : Density ....

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    \ Arridge, C S

    Jackman2011 APACrefauthors Jackman, C M. \ Arridge, C S. APACrefauthors \ 2011 12 . Solar Cycle Effects on the Dynamics of Jupiter's and Saturn's Magnetospheres Solar cycle effects on the dynamics of jupiter's and saturn's magnetospheres . Solar Physics 274 1-2 481--502 . APAC...

    2011 doi

  35. [43]

    , Arridge, C S

    Jackman2014 APACrefauthors Jackman, C M. , Arridge, C S. , Andr \'e , N. , Bagenal, F. , Birn, J. , Freeman, M P. Walsh, A P. APACrefauthors \ 2014 08 . Large- Scale Structure and Dynamics of the Magnetotails of Mercury , Earth , Jupiter and Saturn Large- Scale Structure and D...

    2014 doi

  36. [44]

    , Kivelson, M G

    Joy2002 APACrefauthors Joy, S P. , Kivelson, M G. , Walker, R J. , Khurana, K K. , Russell, C T. \ Ogino, T. APACrefauthors \ 2002 10 . Probabilistic Models of the Jovian Magnetopause and Bow Shock Locations Probabilistic models of the Jovian magnetopause and bow shock locatio...

    2002 doi

  37. [45]

    , Bunce, E J

    Kamran2022 APACrefauthors Kamran, A. , Bunce, E J. , Cowley, S W H. , James, M K. , Nichols, J D. , Provan, G. Gladstone, G R. APACrefauthors \ 2022 12 . Auroral Field-Aligned Current Signatures in Jupiter's Magnetosphere: Juno Magnetic Field Observations and Physical Modeling...

    2022 doi

  38. [46]

    , Arridge, C S

    Kanani2010 APACrefauthors Kanani, S J. , Arridge, C S. , Jones, G H. , Fazakerley, A N. , McAndrews, H J. , Sergis, N. Krupp, N. APACrefauthors \ 2010 06 . A New Form of Saturn 's Magnetopause Using a Dynamic Pressure Balance Model, Based on in Situ, Multi-Instrument Cassini M...

    2010

  39. [47]

    , T \'o th, G

    Keebler2022 APACrefauthors Keebler, T B. , T \'o th, G. , Zieger, B. \ Opher, M. APACrefauthors \ 2022 06 . MSWIM2D : Two-dimensional Outer Heliosphere Solar Wind Modeling MSWIM2D : Two-dimensional outer heliosphere solar wind modeling . Astronomical Journal 260 2 43 . APACref...

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    \ Papitashvili, N E

    King2005 APACrefauthors King, J H. \ Papitashvili, N E. APACrefauthors \ 2005 02 . Solar Wind Spatial Scales in and Comparisons of Hourly Wind and ACE Plasma and Magnetic Field Data Solar wind spatial scales in and comparisons of hourly Wind and ACE plasma and magnetic field d...

    2005 doi

  41. [49]

    , Khurana, K K

    Kivelson2002 APACrefauthors Kivelson, M G. , Khurana, K K. \ Walker, R J. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Sheared Magnetic Field Structure in Jupiter 's Dusk Magnetosphere: Implications for Return Currents Sheared magnetic field structure in Jupiter 's dusk magnetosphere: Implications...

    2002 doi

  42. [50]

    \ Southwood, D J

    Kivelson2005 APACrefauthors Kivelson, M G. \ Southwood, D J. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Dynamical Consequences of Two Modes of Centrifugal Instability in Jupiter 's Outer Magnetosphere Dynamical consequences of two modes of centrifugal instability in Jupiter 's outer magnetospher...

    2005 doi

  43. [51]

    , Connerney, J E P

    Kotsiaros2019 APACrefauthors Kotsiaros, S. , Connerney, J E P. , Clark, G. , Allegrini, F. , Gladstone, G R. , Kurth, W S. Levin, S M. APACrefauthors \ 2019 07 . Birkeland Currents in Jupiter 's Magnetosphere Observed by the Polar-Orbiting Juno Spacecraft Birkeland currents in...

    2019 doi

  44. [52]

    , Sullivan, J D

    Kurth1982 APACrefauthors Kurth, W S. , Sullivan, J D. , Gurnett, D A. , Scarf, F L. , Bridge, H S. \ Sittler Jr., E C. APACrefauthors \ 1982 . Observations of Jupiter 's Distant Magnetotail and Wake Observations of Jupiter 's distant magnetotail and wake . Journal of Geophysic...

    1982 doi

  45. [53]

    , Burlaga, L F

    Lepping1982 APACrefauthors Lepping, R P. , Burlaga, L F. , Desch, M D. \ Klein, L W. APACrefauthors \ 1982 . Evidence for a Distant ( 8,700 RJ ) Jovian Magnetotail: Voyager 2 Observations Evidence for a distant ( 8,700 RJ ) jovian magnetotail: Voyager 2 observations . Geophysi...

    1982 doi

  46. [54]

    , Burlaga, L F

    Lepping1980 APACrefauthors Lepping, R P. , Burlaga, L F. \ Klein, L W. APACrefauthors \ 1980 . Jupiter's Magnetopause, Bow Shock, and 10-Hour Modulated Magnetosheath: Voyagers 1 and 2 Jupiter's magnetopause, bow shock, and 10-hour modulated magnetosheath: Voyagers 1 and 2 . Ge...

    1980 doi

  47. [55]

    , Burlaga, L F

    Lepping1981 APACrefauthors Lepping, R P. , Burlaga, L F. , Klein, L W. , Jessen, J M. \ Goodrich, C C. APACrefauthors \ 1981 . Observations of the Magnetic Field and Plasma Flow in Jupiter 's Magnetosheath Observations of the magnetic field and plasma flow in Jupiter 's magnet...

    1981 doi

  48. [56]

    , Desch, M D

    Lepping1983 APACrefauthors Lepping, R P. , Desch, M D. , Sittler, Jr ., E. C. , Behannon, K W. , Klein, L W. , Sullivan, J D. \ Kurth, W S. APACrefauthors \ 1983 11 . Structure of Other Properties of Jupiter's Distant Magnetotail Structure of other properties of jupiter's dist...

    1983 doi

  49. [57]

    , Ray, L C

    Lorch2020 APACrefauthors Lorch, C T S. , Ray, L C. , Arridge, C S. , Khurana, K K. , Martin, C J. \ Bader, A. APACrefauthors \ 2020 02 . Local Time Asymmetries in Jupiter 's Magnetodisc Currents Local Time Asymmetries in Jupiter 's Magnetodisc Currents . Journal of Geophysical...

    2020 doi

  50. [58]

    , Jackman, C M

    Louis2023 APACrefauthors Louis, C K. , Jackman, C M. , Hospodarsky, G. , O'Kane Hackett, A. , Devon-Hurley , E. , Zarka, P. Bolton, S J. APACrefauthors \ 2023 . Effect of a Magnetospheric Compression on Jovian Radio Emissions: In Situ Case Study Using Juno Data Effect of a mag...

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    , Delamere, P A

    Ma2022 APACrefauthors Ma, X. , Delamere, P A. , Schok, A. , Wing, S. , Johnson, J R. \ Liou, Y L. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Jupiter's Sheared Flow Unstable Magnetopause Boundary Observed by Juno Jupiter's sheared flow unstable magnetopause boundary observed by juno . Journal of ...

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    , Allegrini, F

    McComas2007_NH APACrefauthors McComas, D J. , Allegrini, F. , Bagenal, F. , Crary, F. , Ebert, R W. , Elliott, H. Valek, P. APACrefauthors \ 2007 10 . Diverse Plasma Populations and Structures in Jupiter's Magnetotail Diverse plasma populations and structures in jupiter's magn...

    2007 doi

  53. [61]

    \ Bagenal, F

    McComas2007 APACrefauthors McComas, D J. \ Bagenal, F. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Jupiter: A Fundamentally Different Magnetospheric Interaction with the Solar Wind Jupiter: A fundamentally different magnetospheric interaction with the solar wind . Geophysical Research Letters 34 ...

    2007 doi

  54. [62]

    , Bagenal, F

    McComas2014 APACrefauthors McComas, D J. , Bagenal, F. \ Ebert, R W. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Bimodal Size of Jupiter 's Magnetosphere Bimodal size of Jupiter 's magnetosphere . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 119 3 1523--1529 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1002/2013JA01966...

    2014 doi

  55. [63]

    , Haggerty, D K

    McNutt2007 APACrefauthors McNutt, R L. , Haggerty, D K. , Hill, M E. , Krimigis, S M. , Livi, S. , Ho, G C. Moore, J M. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Energetic Particles in the Jovian Magnetotail Energetic particles in the jovian magnetotail . Science 318 5848 220--222 . APACrefDOI ...

    2007 doi

  56. [64]

    , Szabo, A

    Merka2005 APACrefauthors Merka, J. , Szabo, A. , Slavin, J A. \ Peredo, M. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Three-Dimensional Position and Shape of the Bow Shock and Their Variation with Upstream Mach Numbers and Interplanetary Magnetic Field Orientation Three-dimensional position and ...

    2005 doi

  57. [65]

    , Acu \ n a, M H

    Ness1979a APACrefauthors Ness, N F. , Acu \ n a, M H. , Lepping, R P. , Burlaga, L F. , Behannon, K W. \ Neubauer, F M. APACrefauthors \ 1979 1 . Magnetic Field Studies at Jupiter by Voyager 1: Preliminary Results Magnetic field studies at jupiter by voyager 1: Preliminary res...

    1979 doi

  58. [66]

    , Acu \ n a, M H

    Ness1979b APACrefauthors Ness, N F. , Acu \ n a, M H. , Lepping, R P. , Burlaga, L F. , Behannon, K W. \ Neubauer, F M. APACrefauthors \ 1979 2 . Magnetic Field Studies at Jupiter by Voyager 2: Preliminary Results Magnetic field studies at jupiter by voyager 2: Preliminary res...

    1979 doi

  59. [67]

    , Allegrini, F

    Nichols2020 APACrefauthors Nichols, J D. , Allegrini, F. , Bagenal, F. , Bunce, E J. , Cowley, S W H. , Ebert, R W. Yao, Z. APACrefauthors \ 2020 08 . An Enhancement of Jupiter 's Main Auroral Emission and Magnetospheric Currents An Enhancement of Jupiter 's Main Auroral Emiss...

    2020 doi

  60. [68]

    \ Cowley, S W H

    Nichols2022 APACrefauthors Nichols, J D. \ Cowley, S W H. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Relation of Jupiter 's Dawnside Main Emission Intensity to Magnetospheric Currents During the Juno Mission Relation of Jupiter 's Dawnside Main Emission Intensity to Magnetospheric Currents Durin...

    2022 doi

  61. [69]

    , Walker, R J

    Ogino1998 APACrefauthors Ogino, T. , Walker, R J. \ Kivelson, M G. APACrefauthors \ 1998 01 . A Global Magnetohydrodynamic Simulation of the Jovian Magnetosphere A global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the Jovian magnetosphere . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physic...

    1998 doi

  62. [70]

    , Lang, M

    Owens2020 APACrefauthors Owens, M J. , Lang, M. , Barnard, L. , Riley, P. , Ben-Nun , M. , Scott, C J. Gonzi, S. APACrefauthors \ 2020 03 . 2 2 . Solar Physics 295 3 43 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1007/s11207-020-01605-3 APACrefDOI

    2020 doi

  63. [71]

    \ King, J H

    Papitashvili2020 APACrefauthors Papitashvili, N E. \ King, J H. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . OMNI Hourly Data . OMNI Hourly Data . NASA Space Physics Data Facility . APACrefDOI doi:10.48322/1shr-ht18 APACrefDOI

    2020 doi

  64. [72]

    , Slavin, J A

    Peredo1995 APACrefauthors Peredo, M. , Slavin, J A. , Mazur, E. \ Curtis, S A. APACrefauthors \ 1995 . Three-Dimensional Position and Shape of the Bow Shock and Their Variation with Alfv \'e nic , Sonic and Magnetosonic Mach Numbers and Interplanetary Magnetic Field Orientatio...

    1995

  65. [73]

    \ Bagenal, F

    Phipps2021 APACrefauthors Phipps, P. \ Bagenal, F. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . Centrifugal Equator in Jupiter 's Plasma Sheet Centrifugal Equator in Jupiter 's Plasma Sheet . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 126 1 e2020JA028713 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/2020JA028713 A...

    2021 doi

  66. [74]

    , Bagenal, F

    Ranquist2020 APACrefauthors Ranquist, D A. , Bagenal, F. \ Wilson, R J. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Polar Flattening of Jupiter's Magnetosphere Polar flattening of jupiter's magnetosphere . Geophysical Research Letters 47 16 e2020GL089818 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/2020GL089818 APACrefDOI

    2020 doi

  67. [75]

    , Ergun, R E

    Ray2010 APACrefauthors Ray, L C. , Ergun, R E. , Delamere, P A. \ Bagenal, F. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Magnetosphere-Ionosphere Coupling at Jupiter : Effect of Field-Aligned Potentials on Angular Momentum Transport Magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling at Jupiter : Effect of field-...

    2010 doi

  68. [76]

    APACrefauthors \ 2025 1 02

    Software_JovianBoundaries APACrefauthors Rutala, M J. APACrefauthors \ 2025 1 02 . Mjrutala/ JovianBoundaries : Initial Release. Mjrutala/ JovianBoundaries : Initial release. Zenodo . APACrefDOI doi:10.5281/zenodo.14851327 APACrefDOI

    2025 doi

  69. [77]

    APACrefauthors \ 2025 2 02

    Software_MMESH_0.2.0 APACrefauthors Rutala, M J. APACrefauthors \ 2025 2 02 . Mjrutala/ MMESH : 0.2.0. Mjrutala/ MMESH : 0.2.0. Zenodo . APACrefDOI doi:10.5281/zenodo.14851000 APACrefDOI

    2025 doi

  70. [78]

    , Clarke, J T

    Rutala2024 APACrefauthors Rutala, M J. , Clarke, J T. , Vogt, M F. \ Nichols, J D. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Variation in the Pedersen Conductance near Jupiter's Main Emission Aurora: Comparison of Hubble Space Telescope and Galileo Measurements Variation in the pedersen conduct...

    2024 doi

  71. [79]

    , Jackman, C M

    Rutala2024_MMESH APACrefauthors Rutala, M J. , Jackman, C M. , Owens, M J. , Tao, C. , Fogg, A R. , Murray, S A. \ Barnard, L. APACrefauthors \ 2024 06 . A Multi-Model Ensemble System for the Outer Heliosphere ( MMESH ): Solar Wind Conditions near Jupiter A multi-model ensembl...

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    , Jackman, C M

    Dataset_Rutala2025 APACrefauthors Rutala, M J. , Jackman, C M. , Owens, M J. , Tao, C. , Fogg, A R. , Murray, S A. Keebler, T. APACrefauthors \ 2025 02 . Solar Wind MME (Multi-Model Ensemble) at Target: Jupiter . Solar wind MME (multi-model ensemble) at target: Jupiter . Zenod...

    2025 doi

  73. [81]

    APACrefauthors \ 1985

    Sargent1985 APACrefauthors Sargent III, H H. APACrefauthors \ 1985 . Recurrent Geomagnetic Activity: Evidence for Long-Lived Stability in Solar Wind Structure Recurrent geomagnetic activity: Evidence for long-lived stability in solar wind structure . Journal of Geophysical Res...

    1985 doi

  74. [82]

    , Chao, J K

    Shue1997 APACrefauthors Shue, J H. , Chao, J K. , Fu, H C. , Russell, C T. , Song, P. , Khurana, K K. \ Singer, H J. APACrefauthors \ 1997 05 . A New Functional Form to Study the Solar Wind Control of the Magnetopause Size and Shape A new functional form to study the solar win...

    1997 doi

  75. [83]

    \ Song, P

    Shue2002 APACrefauthors Shue, J H. \ Song, P. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . The Location and Shape of the Magnetopause The location and shape of the magnetopause . Planetary and Space Science 50 5 549--558 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1016/S0032-0633(02)00034-X APACrefDOI

    2002 doi

  76. [84]

    , Song, P

    Shue1998 APACrefauthors Shue, J H. , Song, P. , Russell, C T. , Steinberg, J T. , Chao, J K. , Zastenker, G. Kawano, H. APACrefauthors \ 1998 . Magnetopause Location under Extreme Solar Wind Conditions Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions . Journal of Geop...

    1998 doi

  77. [85]

    \ Summers, D

    Siscoe1981 APACrefauthors Siscoe, G L. \ Summers, D. APACrefauthors \ 1981 09 . Centrifugally Driven Diffusion of Iogenic Plasma Centrifugally driven diffusion of Iogenic plasma . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 86 A10 8471--8479 . APACrefDOI doi:10.1029/JA086iA...

    1981 doi

  78. [86]

    , Smith, E J

    Slavin1985 APACrefauthors Slavin, J A. , Smith, E J. , Spreiter, J R. \ Stahara, S S. APACrefauthors \ 1985 07 . Solar Wind Flow about the Outer Planets: Gas Dynamic Modeling of the Jupiter and Saturn Bow Shocks Solar wind flow about the outer planets: Gas dynamic modeling of ...

    1985 doi

  79. [87]

    , Fillius, R W

    Smith1978 APACrefauthors Smith, E J. , Fillius, R W. \ Wolfe, J H. APACrefauthors \ 1978 . Compression of Jupiter 's Magnetosphere by the Solar Wind Compression of Jupiter 's magnetosphere by the solar wind . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 83 A10 4733--4742 . A...

    1978 doi

  80. [88]

    , Dryer, M

    Smith1981 APACrefauthors Smith, Z K. , Dryer, M. , Fillius, R W. , Smith, E J. \ Wolfe, J H. APACrefauthors \ 1981 . Compression of Jupiter 's Magnetosphere by the Solar Wind: Reexamination via MHD Simulation of Evolving Corotating Interaction Regions Compression of Jupiter 's...

    1981 doi

  81. [89]

    \ Kivelson, M G

    Southwood2001 APACrefauthors Southwood, D J. \ Kivelson, M G. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . A New Perspective Concerning the Influence of the Solar Wind on the Jovian Magnetosphere A new perspective concerning the influence of the solar wind on the Jovian magnetosphere . Journal of ...

    2001 doi

  82. [90]

    , Narheim, B T

    Svenes2004 APACrefauthors Svenes, K R. , Narheim, B T. , Coates, A J. , Linder, D R. \ Young, D T. APACrefauthors \ 2004 09 . Cassini Plasma Spectrometer Electron Measurements Close to the Magnetopause of Jupiter Cassini Plasma Spectrometer electron measurements close to the m...

    2004 doi

  83. [91]

    , Kataoka, R

    Tao2005 APACrefauthors Tao, C. , Kataoka, R. , Fukunishi, H. , Takahashi, Y. \ Yokoyama, T. APACrefauthors \ 2005 11 . Magnetic Field Variations in the Jovian Magnetotail Induced by Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Enhancements Magnetic field variations in the Jovian magnetotail in...

    2005 doi

  84. [92]

    APACrefauthors \ 2001 04

    Taylor2001 APACrefauthors Taylor, K E. APACrefauthors \ 2001 04 . Summarizing Multiple Aspects of Model Performance in a Single Diagram Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram . Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 106 D7 7183--7192 . APAC...

    2001 doi

  85. [93]

    APACrefauthors \ 1983

    Vasyliunas1983 APACrefauthors Vasyliunas, V M. APACrefauthors \ 1983 . Physics of the Jovian Magnetosphere. 11. Plasma Distribution and Flow. Physics of the Jovian magnetosphere. 11. Plasma distribution and flow. Physics of the Jovian Magnetosphere Physics of the jovian magnet...

    1983

  86. [94]

    , Gelman, A

    Vehtari2017 APACrefauthors Vehtari, A. , Gelman, A. \ Gabry, J. APACrefauthors \ 2017 09 . Practical Bayesian Model Evaluation Using Leave-One-out Cross-Validation and WAIC Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC . Statistics and Compu...

    2017 doi

  87. [95]

    , Gyalay, S

    Vogt2019 APACrefauthors Vogt, M F. , Gyalay, S. , Kronberg, E A. , Bunce, E J. , Kurth, W S. , Zieger, B. \ Tao, C. APACrefauthors \ 2019 12 . Solar Wind Interaction with Jupiter's Magnetosphere: A Statistical Study of Galileo in Situ Data and Modeled Upstream Solar Wind Condi...

    2019

  88. [96]

    , Kivelson, M G

    Vogt2010 APACrefauthors Vogt, M F. , Kivelson, M G. , Khurana, K K. , Joy, S P. \ Walker, R J. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Reconnection and Flows in the Jovian Magnetotail as Inferred from Magnetometer Observations Reconnection and flows in the Jovian magnetotail as inferred from ...

    2010 doi

  89. [97]

    , Bagenal, F

    Wang2024_results APACrefauthors Wang, J z. , Bagenal, F. , Wilson, R J. , Nerney, E. , Crary, F. , Dols, V. Szalay, J R. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Forward Modeling of 3- D Ion Properties in Jupiter's Magnetosphere Using Juno/ JADE-i Data Forward modeling of 3- D ion properties i...

    2024 doi

  90. [98]

    APACrefauthors \ 2010

    Watanabe2010 APACrefauthors Watanabe, S. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Asymptotic Equivalence of Bayes Cross Validation and Widely Applicable Information Criterion in Singular Learning Theory Asymptotic equivalence of bayes cross validation and widely applicable information criterio...

    2010

  91. [99]

    , Anderson, B J

    Winslow2013 APACrefauthors Winslow, R M. , Anderson, B J. , Johnson, C L. , Slavin, J A. , Korth, H. , Purucker, M E. Solomon, S C. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Mercury's Magnetopause and Bow Shock from MESSENGER Magnetometer Observations Mercury's magnetopause and bow shock from M...

    2013 doi

  92. [100]

    , Krupp, N

    Woch2002 APACrefauthors Woch, J. , Krupp, N. \ Lagg, A. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Particle Bursts in the Jovian Magnetosphere: Evidence for a near- Jupiter Neutral Line Particle bursts in the Jovian magnetosphere: Evidence for a near- Jupiter neutral line . Geophysical Research ...

    2002 doi

  93. [101]

    , Guo, R

    Yao2024 APACrefauthors Yao, Z. , Guo, R. , Wei, Y. , Bonfond, B. , Grodent, D. , Zhang, B. Pu, Z. APACrefauthors \ 2024 . Recent Advances in the Magnetic Reconnection, Dipolarization, and Auroral Processes at Giant Planets from the Perspective of Comparative Planetology Recent...

    2024 doi

  94. [102]

    , Bonfond, B

    Yao2022 APACrefauthors Yao, Z H. , Bonfond, B. , Grodent, D. , Chan \'e , E. , Dunn, W R. , Kurth, W S. Bolton, S J. APACrefauthors \ 2022 10 . On the Relation between Auroral Morphologies and Compression Conditions of Jupiter's Magnetopause: Observations from Juno and the Hub...

    2022

  95. [103]

    , Delamere, P A

    Zhang2018 APACrefauthors Zhang, B. , Delamere, P A. , Ma, X. , Burkholder, B. , Wiltberger, M. , Lyon, J G. Sorathia, K A. APACrefauthors \ 2018 01 . Asymmetric Kelvin-Helmholtz Instability at Jupiter's Magnetopause Boundary: Implications for Corotation-Dominated Systems Asymm...

    2018 doi

  96. [104]

    \ Hansen, K C

    Zieger2008 APACrefauthors Zieger, B. \ Hansen, K C. APACrefauthors \ 2008 08 . Statistical Validation of a Solar Wind Propagation Model from 1 to 10 AU Statistical validation of a solar wind propagation model from 1 to 10 AU . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 11...

    2008 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.