REVIEW 4 cited by
Copilot Arena: A Platform for Code LLM Evaluation in the Wild
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Copilot Arena: A Platform for Code LLM Evaluation in the Wild
read the original abstract
Evaluating in-the-wild coding capabilities of large language models (LLMs) is a challenging endeavor with no clear solution. We introduce Copilot Arena, a platform to collect user preferences for code generation through native integration into a developer's working environment. Copilot Arena comprises a novel interface for comparing pairs of model outputs, a sampling strategy optimized to reduce latency, and a prompting scheme to enable code completion functionality. Copilot Arena has served over 4.5 million suggestions from 10 models and collected over 11k pairwise judgements. Our results highlight the importance of model evaluations in integrated settings. We find that model rankings from Copilot Arena differ from those of existing evaluations, which we attribute to the more realistic distribution of data and tasks contained in Copilot Arena. We also identify novel insights into human preferences on code such as an observed consistency in user preference across programming languages yet significant variation in preference due to task category. We open-source Copilot Arena and release data to enable human-centric evaluations and improve understanding of coding assistants.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Edit, But Verify: An Empirical Audit of Instructed Code-Editing Benchmarks
The two main benchmarks for LLM instructed code editing over-represent Python, miss common real-world domains and edit types, and have test coverage issues that limit what they measure.
-
Nonparametric LLM Evaluation from Preference Data
A debiased, nonparametric estimator (DMLRank) yields efficient ranking scores and valid confidence intervals for LLM leaderboards from preference data, covering Bradley-Terry, Borda, and rank centrality.
-
RECAP: An End-to-End Platform for Capturing, Replaying, and Analyzing AI-Assisted Programming Interactions
RECAP captures, replays, and analyzes AI-assisted programming sessions by linking prompts, edits, and developer actions in a single timeline.
-
Mercury: Ultra-Fast Language Models Based on Diffusion
Mercury Coder diffusion LLMs achieve throughputs of 1109 and 737 tokens per second on H100 GPUs, up to 10x faster than frontier models with comparable quality.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.