Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Copilot Arena: A Platform for Code LLM Evaluation in the Wild

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.09328 v1 pith:BVNPT4Z3 submitted 2025-02-13 cs.SE

Copilot Arena: A Platform for Code LLM Evaluation in the Wild

classification cs.SE
keywords arenacopilotcodeevaluationsmodelcodingdataenable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Evaluating in-the-wild coding capabilities of large language models (LLMs) is a challenging endeavor with no clear solution. We introduce Copilot Arena, a platform to collect user preferences for code generation through native integration into a developer's working environment. Copilot Arena comprises a novel interface for comparing pairs of model outputs, a sampling strategy optimized to reduce latency, and a prompting scheme to enable code completion functionality. Copilot Arena has served over 4.5 million suggestions from 10 models and collected over 11k pairwise judgements. Our results highlight the importance of model evaluations in integrated settings. We find that model rankings from Copilot Arena differ from those of existing evaluations, which we attribute to the more realistic distribution of data and tasks contained in Copilot Arena. We also identify novel insights into human preferences on code such as an observed consistency in user preference across programming languages yet significant variation in preference due to task category. We open-source Copilot Arena and release data to enable human-centric evaluations and improve understanding of coding assistants.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Edit, But Verify: An Empirical Audit of Instructed Code-Editing Benchmarks

    cs.SE 2026-04 conditional novelty 8.0

    The two main benchmarks for LLM instructed code editing over-represent Python, miss common real-world domains and edit types, and have test coverage issues that limit what they measure.

  2. Nonparametric LLM Evaluation from Preference Data

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0

    A debiased, nonparametric estimator (DMLRank) yields efficient ranking scores and valid confidence intervals for LLM leaderboards from preference data, covering Bradley-Terry, Borda, and rank centrality.

  3. RECAP: An End-to-End Platform for Capturing, Replaying, and Analyzing AI-Assisted Programming Interactions

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RECAP captures, replays, and analyzes AI-assisted programming sessions by linking prompts, edits, and developer actions in a single timeline.

  4. Mercury: Ultra-Fast Language Models Based on Diffusion

    cs.CL 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Mercury Coder diffusion LLMs achieve throughputs of 1109 and 737 tokens per second on H100 GPUs, up to 10x faster than frontier models with comparable quality.