Wigner multiplets in QFT: dark sector and CPT-violating scenarios

Cheng-Yang Lee; Ruifeng Leng; Siyi Zhou

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Wigner multiplets in QFT: dark sector and CPT-violating scenarios

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Lorentz-invariant QFTs built from Wigner-degenerate fermion doublets can break CPT in their Yukawa and gauge interactions, even though the free theory respects it.

desk verdict Careful, self-contained construction of Wigner-doublet QFT, but the advertised claim that interactions generically break CPT does not survive contact with the paper's own Eq. (6.13): the violation is basis-dependent operator convention, not a property of the Lagrangian. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09684 v2 pith:WIKHXOCP submitted 2025-02-13 hep-ph hep-th

Cheng-Yang Lee , Ruifeng Leng , Siyi Zhou This is my paper

classification hep-phhep-th

keywords WignerdegeneracydiscretesymmetriesCPTviolationdarkmatterspin-1/2fermionsYukawainteractionsgaugetheoryphasetransition

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Wigner's study of the extended Poincaré group allows particle states with an extra discrete label beyond momentum and spin, the Wigner degeneracy, and this paper tries to show that these states support a complete quantum field theory. The authors build a massive spin-1/2 Wigner doublet from two causal Dirac fields and compute how parity, time-reversal, and charge conjugation mix the two degenerate components, giving the free theory an accidental U(2) symmetry. Their central result is that Yukawa and gauge interactions of such doublets generally fail to be CPT invariant, because the combined CPT transformation can exchange the two Wigner labels. In a concrete example with an anti-diagonal CPT matrix and a diagonal Yukawa matrix satisfying $y_{+1/2} = y_{-1/2}^* \notin \mathbb{R}$, the interaction violates CPT while preserving time-reversal. If correct, this would show that local, Lorentz-invariant field theories with Wigner degeneracy can evade the standard CPT theorem, opening a new route for dark-matter model building and for early-universe phase transitions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Wigner doublet $\Psi(x) = (\psi_{+1/2}(x), \psi_{-1/2}(x))^T$: two mass-degenerate causal Dirac spinor fields labeled by the Wigner index $n = \pm 1/2$ in addition to the spin index. The machinery is the collection of $2\times2$ discrete-symmetry matrices, a diagonal parity matrix, an anti-diagonal time-reversal matrix, a general $U(2)$ charge-conjugation matrix, and their product $\Xi = D(C)D(P)D(T)$, which appears in the field transformation $\Theta\Psi(x)\Theta^{-1} = \gamma^5\Xi^\dagger\Psi^*(-x)$. The identity that carries the argument is Eq. (6.6), $Y'^T = \Xi Y^T \Xi^\dagger$, which maps a Yukawa coupling matrix to its CPT transform; whenever the image differs from the original, the interaction breaks CPT. The free Lagrangian $\bar\Psi(i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu - m)\Psi$ is accidentally $U(2)$-invariant, and its conserved Wigner charges are what make the degenerate labels physically meaningful once the internal symmetry that would exchange them is broken.

What would settle it

Take the paper's diagonal Yukawa matrix and put any diagonal unitary matrix in place of $\Xi$ in Eq. (6.6), $Y'^T = \Xi Y^T \Xi^\dagger$. Since diagonal matrices commute, the result is $Y' = Y$, so the same interaction is CPT invariant in the diagonal class; the claimed general violation therefore stands only if the anti-diagonal $\Xi$ of Eq. (4.23) is the unique physically allowed CPT matrix, which the paper does not prove.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that interactions of Wigner-degenerate fermions are not automatically CPT invariant, in contrast to every interaction in the conventional representation. For the doublet field $\Psi = (\psi_{+1/2}, \psi_{-1/2})^T$ and the anti-diagonal CPT matrix $\Xi = \mathrm{antidiag}(e^{i\varphi/2}, e^{-i\varphi/2})$, the Yukawa interaction transforms as $\Theta H_{\rm Yuk}(x;Y)\Theta^{-1} = H_{\rm Yuk}(-x;Y')$ with $Y'^T = \Xi Y^T \Xi^\dagger$. When $Y$ is diagonal and $y_{+1/2}^{L,R} = (y_{-1/2}^{L,R})^* \notin \mathbb{R}$, this gives $Y'\neq Y$, so the interaction breaks CPT while preserving T. The free Wigner-doublet theory, by contrast, is invariant under P, C, T, and CPT separately, and CPT can be restored in interacting theories by imposing conditions such as $[Y,\Xi^T]=0$ or by assigning a specific Wigner exchange symmetry to the gauge fields in a gauged U(2) theory.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the physical CPT operator must mix the two Wigner states through the anti-diagonal matrix of Eq. (4.23); if a diagonal mixing matrix is allowed instead, the paper's own Yukawa example becomes CPT invariant.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Wigner doublets become a concrete dark-matter alternative: two exactly degenerate fermions carrying a conserved Wigner charge, with the degeneracy made physical only when the internal symmetry exchanging the two states is broken.
Yukawa interactions of Wigner doublets must satisfy $Y'^T = \Xi Y^T \Xi^\dagger$ to be CPT invariant, which forces constraints such as $[Y,\Xi^T]=0$ or special coupling forms; these are explicit consistency conditions for dark-sector Lagrangians.
In a gauged $U(2)$ Wigner theory, CPT invariance requires the gauge fields to transform with a Wigner exchange symmetry under CPT, so dark gauge structures come with a built-in symmetry test.
Spontaneous breaking of the accidental $U(2)$ symmetry, through unequal vacuum expectation values of the two Wigner components, predicts an early-universe phase transition and potentially observable gravitational waves.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's own restoration condition $[Y,\Xi^T]=0$ shows that the general CPT-violation claim is tied to the anti-diagonal class: with any diagonal $\Xi$, the paper's diagonal Yukawa example is CPT invariant, so the strong conclusion collapses unless anti-diagonal mixing is proven to be the only physical possibility.
A natural next step, not taken in the paper, is to classify all admissible $\Xi$ matrices for $n$-fold Wigner degeneracy and decide which mixing classes are compatible with a given interaction set; that would turn the example into a general theorem about Wigner-type CPT violation.
If Wigner-doublet dark matter exists, CPT-violating phases such as $y_{+1/2} = y_{-1/2}^* \notin \mathbb{R}$ should enter low-energy observables, so bounds on CPT and T violation in dark-sector processes (or the absence of the predicted phase-transition gravitational waves) would directly constrain the Wigner-mixing matrix.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing you should know: this is a serious, self-contained formal paper, and the explicit QFT construction is genuinely new. Second thing: the advertised result—that Yukawa and gauge interactions “generally break CPT”—does not hold as stated. The stress-test note is right, and the failure is load-bearing, not cosmetic.

What is actually new: Lee, Leng, and Zhou build, for the first time, a local QFT for two-fold Wigner-degenerate spin-1/2 doublets: field expansions, canonical quantization, complete C, P, T, CPT transformation laws on states and fields, bilinear transformation rules, and worked Yukawa and U(2) gauge couplings. The free theory is shown to be invariant under all discrete symmetries and to have an accidental U(2). That part is internally consistent and will be a useful reference. The paper is honest about what is deferred—the cosmological phase-transition consequences are explicitly future work—and the heavy citation of the authors' own Elko papers is not circular, since the doublet construction is a different object.

The soft spot is exactly where the abstract makes its strongest claim. The CPT transformation matrix Xi is an arbitrary U(2) matrix (Eq. 4.5), and the authors themselves note it can be brought to either diagonal or anti-diagonal form by a basis choice. The whole CPT-violation argument in Sec. 6.1 relies on picking the anti-diagonal Xi of Eq. (4.23), with no physical criterion selecting it. Their own condition (6.13) says CPT is restored when [Y, Xi^T] = 0, and Xi = 1 trivially satisfies that for the very same Yukawa matrix they call CPT-violating in (6.11)-(6.12). Since the theory is just two Dirac fields with a flavor index before interactions, the standard CPT operator (no Wigner mixing) is a symmetry. Nothing in the paper demonstrates an intrinsic breakdown; what changes is a discrete-symmetry convention. The gauge section reinforces this: to get CPT invariance they must impose a Wigner symmetry on the gauge fields (6.36), which is a constraint on the operator convention, not a theorem about the Lagrangian. I also note the paper's own diagonal Xi (Sec. 4.1) is explicitly said to leave every Poincare-invariant term invariant.

So: a careful formal framework, worth having, attached to a headline claim that collapses. A referee who knows the CPT theorem could force the needed reframing: this is a study of non-standard discrete-symmetry operators for Wigner doublets, not a challenge to CPT. I would send it to review with that instruction rather than desk-reject; the construction and transformation catalog are solid enough to be salvageable, and the literature on Wigner multiplets will cite it either way.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a quantum field theory for massive spin-1/2 Wigner-degenerate doublets, in which each fermion carries an extra discrete index n=±1/2. It derives transformations under C, P, T, and CPT, builds a free doublet Lagrangian with an accidental U(2) symmetry, and studies Yukawa and U(2) gauge interactions. The central advertised result is that such interactions generally break CPT invariance when the CPT matrix is anti-diagonal, with a concrete Yukawa example satisfying y_+=y_-^* not real; the paper also gives conditions for CPT conservation and sketches dark-matter and cosmological implications.

Significance. If the central claim were correct, the paper would challenge the standard CPT theorem for local, Lorentz-invariant QFT and would open a new dark-sector framework. The construction is systematic: the transformation rules in Section 3, the free-field canonical formalism in Section 5, and the explicit conservation conditions in Eq. (6.13) are clearly presented and internally consistent. However, the claimed CPT violation is not a property of the Lagrangians considered; it is an artifact of choosing the anti-diagonal CPT matrix of Eq. (4.23) rather than the diagonal choice of Eq. (4.16). The paper's own Eq. (6.13) shows that Ξ=1 restores CPT invariance for the same Yukawa theory, so the advertised challenge to the CPT theorem is not established.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 4, Eq. (6.13), Eqs. (6.11)-(6.12)] The central CPT-violation claim is basis-dependent. The paper states in Section 4 that the unitary matrix Ξ can always be brought to either diagonal or anti-diagonal form by a basis redefinition, and Eq. (6.13) gives [Y, Ξ^T]=0 as the CPT-conservation condition, with Ξ=1 as an allowed trivial solution. Applying Ξ=1 to the Yukawa example of Eqs. (6.11)-(6.12), Eq. (6.6) gives Y'=Y, so the same interaction is CPT invariant. The paper never supplies a physical criterion that selects the anti-diagonal Ξ of Eq. (4.23) over the diagonal choice of Eq. (4.16); the free theory is U(2)-invariant (Eqs. (5.35)-(5.38)), so the two choices are not different theories. The abstract's claim that such interactions 'generally break' CPT is therefore unsupported.
[Eqs. (5.42), (4.24)-(4.25)] The anti-diagonal Θ does not reverse the conserved Wigner charge Q3. Under Eq. (4.24), |p,σ,+1/2;a> maps to |p,-σ,-1/2;a^c>, whose Q3 eigenvalue is -(-1/2)=+1/2, so Q3 is unchanged; the same holds for n=-1/2. A standard CPT operator must reverse additive charges. This confirms that the anti-diagonal Θ is a CPT-like operator combined with an internal U(2) rotation, not the physical CPT transformation of the local, Lorentz-invariant theory, and it strengthens the conclusion that the reported 'explicit CPT violation' is a convention artifact.
[Sec. 5.1 and Sec. 6.1] The concrete Yukawa example is not a counterexample to the CPT theorem. The fields ψ_{±1/2} are ordinary local Dirac fields with standard spin-statistics, and the doublet is simply two Dirac fields with an internal index; the Lagrangian (5.1) is local and Lorentz invariant. The standard CPT theorem therefore applies, and the fact that the conventional diagonal choice Ξ=1 restores invariance is expected. To claim a genuine breakdown, the paper would need to show that the anti-diagonal choice is forced by some physical requirement (such as charge reversal or a consistent definition of time reversal) rather than chosen by convention; no such argument appears in Sections 3-6.

minor comments (4)

[Eq. (6.50)] The second line of Eq. (6.50) is self-referential: G′2μ(Tx) = −sinϕ G1μ(Tx) − cosϕ G′2μ(Tx) presumably should involve G2μ on the right-hand side.
[Before Eq. (4.16)] The assertion that a 2×2 unitary Ξ can always be brought to diagonal or anti-diagonal form is stated without proof; an argument analogous to Appendix C would make the classification easier to verify.
[Eqs. (6.15) and (6.23)] The symbol HA is used for both the original U(1) interaction in Eq. (6.15) and the rotated neutral-current interaction in Eq. (6.23); this reuse makes the basis rotation harder to follow.
[Footnote 4] The claim that the superposition Lagrangian L′ does not yield the correct free Hamiltonian is asserted without demonstration; a brief computation would clarify the obstruction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Self-contained construction; no circularity — the CPT claim rests on an explicit basis choice, not on a fitted or self-cited input.

full rationale

The paper is a self-contained representation-theoretic construction. Wigner doublets are defined in Sec. 3.1; the inversion matrices D(P), D(T), and D(C) are introduced in Eqs. (3.19)-(3.20) and (3.62); and the field transformations in Eqs. (3.29)-(3.30), (3.60), and (4.11) follow algebraically from these definitions. No free parameter is fitted to data, and the Yukawa/gauge results in Sec. 6 are direct applications of the transformation rules to the interaction Hamiltonians (6.3) and (6.14). The main liability is not circularity but convention dependence: Sec. 4 states that the 2x2 unitary matrix Xi can be transformed to either diagonal or anti-diagonal form, and Sec. 6.2 explicitly says 'to achieve a nontrivial result, we consider a CPT transformation that exchanges the Wigner degeneracies,' choosing the anti-diagonal Xi of Eq. (4.23). The paper's own Eqs. (4.20) and (6.13) show that with a diagonal Xi, or with Xi = 1, the same Yukawa theory is CPT invariant. Thus the claimed CPT violation is not demonstrated to be intrinsic, but the choice is exhibited rather than hidden, and the derivation of Y' from Y is a genuine algebraic consequence rather than an input renamed as a prediction. Self-citations to the authors' earlier mass-dimension-one work ([9], [45]) concern the alternative superposition framework and are not load-bearing for the doublet construction developed here. No circular step meets the quoted-equation standard.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted to data; the free phases parameterize the discrete-symmetry representation, and the central CPT-violation conclusion depends on freely choosing the anti-diagonal Ξ. The invented entities are the Wigner-degenerate fermion and its U(2) gauge sector, both without independent experimental handles.

free parameters (3)

Time-reversal phase φ = e^{iφ}, unspecified
Introduced in D(T), Eq. (3.20); controls T and CPT mixing of Wigner degeneracies; set to 0 in the explicit gauge example, Eq. (6.33).
Intrinsic parities η_n, η_c_n = unspecified phases
Eigenvalues of D(P), Eq. (3.19), constrained by η_n* = -η_c_n (3.26); affect CPT phase assignments.
Charge-conjugation U(2) parameters (θ, θ_a) = unspecified
D(C) parameterization, Eqs. (3.61)-(3.62); the anti-diagonal CPT example (4.23) chooses (θ,θ)=(0,0,θ_3); the CPT-conservation conditions depend on these phases.

assumptions (5)

standard math Wigner's classification of unitary irreducible representations of the Poincaré group and the little-group construction
Used throughout Section 2 and Appendix B as the starting point for particle states.
ad hoc to paper There exists a basis where D(P) is diagonal and D(T) is anti-diagonal
Stated in Section 3.2, Eqs. (3.19)-(3.20); the whole doublet analysis assumes this form.
domain assumption Causality and Lorentz covariance fix the spinor polarizations to the standard Dirac u, v
Section 3.1, Eqs. (3.12)-(3.13); the fields are two identical Dirac fields.
domain assumption Charge superselection rules split the Hilbert space by Wigner charge
Section 3.2, paragraph on 'charge superselection rules are required'.
standard math Vanishing spin-bordism group Ω^spin_5(BU(2)) = 0 ensures no global anomaly
Section 6.2, via Ref. [65]; used to argue the U(2) gauge theory is anomaly-free.

invented entities (2)

Wigner-degenerate massive spin-1/2 fermion doublet
purpose: Proposed dark-matter candidate field content
No mass, coupling, or signature predicted; framework is illustrative (Section 6).
Dark U(2) gauge bosons V_μ, G^a_μ
purpose: Gauge the accidental U(2) symmetry of the doublet
No mass spectrum or direct detection signature derived; phase-transition phenomenology deferred.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wigner multiplets in QFT: dark sector and CPT-violating scenarios." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WIKHXOCP

@misc{pith2026250209684,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wigner multiplets in QFT: dark sector and CPT-violating scenarios},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WIKHXOCP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09684}
}

abstract

The classification of elementary particles based on unitary irreducible representations of the Poincare group has been a cornerstone of modern Quantum Field Theory (QFT). While the Standard Model (SM) does not inherently include Dark Matter (DM), any fundamental DM candidate should still conform to this classification or its extensions. Beyond the standard representations, Wigner introduced a class of nontrivial states characterized by an additional discrete degree of freedom, known as the Wigner degeneracy. We systematically investigate the QFT of such Wigner degenerate multiplets, particularly focusing on the massive spin-1/2 case. We construct a theoretical framework where the two-fold Wigner spinor fields, $\psi_{\pm\frac{1}{2}}(x)$, form a doublet representation. We analyze their transformation properties under discrete symmetries (C, P, and T), revealing novel mixing effects due to Wigner degeneracy and an emergent accidental U(2) global symmetry. Furthermore, we explore their Yukawa and gauge interactions, demonstrating that such interactions generally break the CPT symmetry. However, we derive conditions for the CPT conservation and discuss potential phenomenological consequences beyond the SM. These results provide new insights into the possible role of Wigner-degenerate states in fundamental physics, particularly in the dark sector.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

[1]

E. P. Wigner,On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group,Annals of Mathematics40(Jan., 1939) 149–204

work page 1939
[2]

E. P. Wigner,Unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group including reflections, inGroup theoretical concepts and methods in elementary particle physics, pp. 37–80, Gordon and Breach, 1964

work page 1964
[3]

Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields

S. Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 6, 2005

2005
[4]

Weinberg,Feynman Rules for Any Spin,Phys

S. Weinberg,Feynman Rules for Any Spin,Phys. Rev.133(1964) B1318–B1332

work page 1964
[5]

D. V. Ahluwalia,Spin-half bosons with mass dimension three half: towards a resolution of the cosmological constant problem,EPL131(2020), no. 4 41001, [arXiv:2008.02630]

arXiv 2020
[6]

D. V. Ahluwalia and C.-Y. Lee,Spin-half bosons with mass dimension three-half: Evading the spin-statistics theorem,EPL140(2022), no. 2 24001, [arXiv:2212.09457]. [Erratum: EPL 140, 69901 (2022)]

arXiv 2022
[7]

D. V. Ahluwalia,Mass Dimension One Fermions. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2019

work page 2019
[8]

D. V. Ahluwalia, J. M. H. da Silva, C.-Y. Lee, Y.-X. Liu, S. H. Pereira, and M. M. Sorkhi, Mass dimension one fermions: Constructing darkness,Phys. Rept.967(2022) 1–43, [arXiv:2205.04754]

arXiv 2022

Show all 63 references

[9]

D. V. Ahluwalia, J. M. H. da Silva, and C.-Y. Lee,Mass dimension one fields with Wigner degeneracy: A theory of dark matter,Nucl. Phys. B987(2023) 116092, [arXiv:2212.13114]

2023 arXiv
[10]

Basak and S

A. Basak and S. Shankaranarayanan,Super-inflation and generation of first order vector perturbations in Elko,JCAP1505(2015) 034, [arXiv:1410.5768]

2015 arXiv
[11]

C. G. Boehmer,The Einstein-Cartan-Elko system,Annalen Phys.16(2007) 38–44, [gr-qc/0607088]

2007 arXiv
[12]

C. G. Boehmer,The Einstein-Elko system: Can dark matter drive inflation?,Annalen Phys. 16(2007) 325–341, [gr-qc/0701087]

2007 arXiv
[13]

C. G. Boehmer and J. Burnett,Dark spinors with torsion in cosmology,Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 104001, [arXiv:0809.0469]

2008 arXiv
[14]

C. G. Boehmer,Dark spinor inflation: Theory primer and dynamics,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 123535, [arXiv:0804.0616]

2008 arXiv
[15]

C. G. Boehmer and J. Burnett,Dark energy with dark spinors,Mod. Phys. Lett. A25(2010) 101–110, [arXiv:0906.1351]

2010 arXiv
[16]

C. G. Boehmer, J. Burnett, D. F. Mota, and D. J. Shaw,Dark spinor models in gravitation and cosmology,JHEP07(2010) 053, [arXiv:1003.3858]

2010 arXiv
[17]

J. M. H. da Silva and S. H. Pereira,Exact solutions to Elko spinors in spatially flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetimes,JCAP03(2014) 009, [arXiv:1401.3252]

2014 arXiv
[18]

S. H. Pereira, A. P. S. Souza, and J. M. H. da Silva,Some remarks on the attractor behaviour in ELKO cosmology,JCAP08(2014) 020, [arXiv:1402.6723]

2014 arXiv
[19]

A. P. S. Souza, S. H. Pereira, and J. F. Jesus,A new approach on the stability analysis in ELKO cosmology,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015), no. 1 36, [arXiv:1407.3401]. – 37 –

2015 arXiv
[20]

S. H. Pereira and A. P. S. Souza,ELKO applications in cosmology,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23 (2014), no. 14 1444008

2014
[21]

S. H. Pereira, A. P. S. Souza, J. M. H. da Silva, and J. F. Jesus,Λ(t)cosmology induced by a slowly varying Elko field,JCAP01(2017) 055, [arXiv:1608.02777]

2017 arXiv
[22]

S. H. Pereira and R. C. Lima,Creation of mass dimension one fermionic particles in asymptotically expanding universe,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26(2017), no. 12 1730028, [arXiv:1612.02240]

2017 arXiv
[23]

S. H. Pereira and T. M. Guimarães,From inflation to recent cosmic acceleration: The fermionic Elko field driving the evolution of the universe,JCAP09(2017) 038, [arXiv:1702.07385]

2017 arXiv
[24]

S. H. Pereira, R. F. L. Holanda, and A. P. S. Souza,Evolution of the universe driven by a mass dimension one fermion field,EPL120(2017), no. 3 31001, [arXiv:1703.07636]

2017 arXiv
[25]

R. J. B. Rogerio, J. M. H. da Silva, M. Dias, and S. H. Pereira,Effective lagrangian for a mass dimension one fermionic field in curved spacetime,JHEP02(2018) 145, [arXiv:1709.08707]

2018 arXiv
[26]

S. H. Pereira and R. S. Costa,Partition function for a mass dimension one fermionic field and the dark matter halo of galaxies,Mod. Phys. Lett. A34(2019), no. 16 1950126, [arXiv:1807.06944]

2019 arXiv
[27]

S. H. Pereira, M. E. S. Alves, and T. M. Guimarães,An unified cosmological evolution driven by a mass dimension one fermionic field,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019), no. 6 543, [arXiv:1811.00390]

2019 arXiv
[28]

S. H. Pereira, R. C. Lima, M. E. S. Alves, T. M. Guimarães, J. F. Jesus, and A. P. S. Souza, Cosmology with mass dimension one fields: recent developments,Eur. Phys. J. ST229 (2020), no. 11 2079–2116

2020
[29]

S. H. Pereira,Degeneracy pressure of mass dimension one fermionic fields and the dark matter halo of galaxies,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31(2022), no. 07 2250056, [arXiv:2110.12890]

2022 arXiv
[30]

R. C. Lima, T. M. Guimarães, and S. H. Pereira,A pilot study on canonical gravity with mass dimension one fermions,JHEP09(2022) 132, [arXiv:2206.13941]

2022 arXiv
[31]

I. C. Jardim, G. Alencar, R. R. Landim, and R. N. C. Filho,Solutions to the problem of Elko spinor localization in brane models,Phys. Rev.D91(2015) 085008, [arXiv:1411.6962]

2015 arXiv
[32]

D. M. Dantas, R. da Rocha, and C. A. S. Almeida,Exotic Elko on String-Like Defects in Six Dimensions,EPL117(2017), no. 5 51001, [arXiv:1512.07888]

2017 arXiv
[33]

Zhou, Y.-Z

X.-N. Zhou, Y.-Z. Du, Z.-H. Zhao, and Y.-X. Liu,Localization of five-dimensional Elko spinors with non-minimal coupling on thick branes,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018), no. 6 493, [arXiv:1710.02842]

2018 arXiv
[34]

Zhou, Y.-Z

X.-N. Zhou, Y.-Z. Du, X.-Y. Ma, and Z.-H. Zhao,Localization of five-dimensional Elko spinors on dS/AdS thick branes,Chin. Phys. C46(2022), no. 2 023101, [arXiv:1812.08332]

2022 arXiv
[35]

M. M. Sorkhi and Z. Ghalenovi,Localization of massless Elko spinor fields on de Sitter thick branes,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33(2018), no. 29 1850172

2018
[36]

M. M. Sorkhi and Z. Ghalenovi,Localization of Elko spinor fields in tachyonic de Sitter braneworld models,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020), no. 4 314. – 38 –

2020
[37]

M. Dias, F. de Campos, and J. M. H. da Silva,Exploring Elko typical signature,Phys. Lett. B706(2012) 352–359, [arXiv:1012.4642]

2012 arXiv
[38]

Agarwal, P

B. Agarwal, P. Jain, S. Mitra, A. C. Nayak, and R. K. Verma,ELKO fermions as dark matter candidates,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 075027, [arXiv:1407.0797]

2015 arXiv
[39]

Alves, F

A. Alves, F. de Campos, M. Dias, and J. M. Hoff da Silva,Searching for Elko dark matter spinors at the CERN LHC,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30(2015), no. 01 1550006, [arXiv:1401.1127]

2015 arXiv
[40]

Alves, M

A. Alves, M. Dias, and F. de Campos,Perspectives for an Elko Phenomenology using Monojets at the 14 TeV LHC,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23(2014), no. 14 1444005, [arXiv:1410.3766]

2014 arXiv
[41]

Alves, M

A. Alves, M. Dias, F. de Campos, L. Duarte, and J. M. H. da Silva,Constraining Elko Dark Matter at the LHC with Monophoton Events,EPL121(2018), no. 3 31001, [arXiv:1712.05180]

2018 arXiv
[42]

C. A. Moura, F. Kamiya, L. Duarte, M. Dias, and J. M. H. da Silva,Sensitivity of accelerator-based neutrino experiments to neutrino-dark matter interaction: Elko as a viable dark matter candidate,EPL140(2022), no. 1 10002, [arXiv:2109.03881]

2022 arXiv
[43]

D. V. Ahluwalia and D. Grumiller,Dark matter: A spin one half fermion field with mass dimension one?,Phys. Rev.D72(2005) 067701, [hep-th/0410192]

2005 arXiv
[44]

D. V. Ahluwalia and D. Grumiller,Spin half fermions with mass dimension one: Theory, phenomenology, and dark matter,JCAP0507(2005) 012, [hep-th/0412080]

2005 arXiv
[45]

D. V. Ahluwalia, G. B. de Gracia, J. M. H. da Silva, C.-Y. Lee, and B. M. Pimentel, Irreducible representations of the Poincaré group with reflections and two-fold Wigner degeneracy,JHEP04(2024) 075, [arXiv:2312.17038]

2024 arXiv
[46]

F. A. da Silva Barbosa and J. M. H. da Silva,Non-standard Wigner doublets,EPL144 (2023), no. 5 54001, [arXiv:2312.07675]

2023 arXiv
[47]

T. D. Lee and G. C. Wick,Space Inversion, Time Reversal, and Other Discrete Symmetries in Local Field Theories,Phys. Rev.148(1966) 1385–1404

1966
[48]

Langacker,The Standard Model and Beyond

P. Langacker,The Standard Model and Beyond. Taylor & Francis, 2017. [49]CMSCollaboration, V. Khachatryan et al.,Searches for invisible decays of the Higgs boson in pp collisions at√s= 7, 8, and 13 TeV,JHEP02(2017) 135, [arXiv:1610.09218]

2017 arXiv
[50]

M. Aaboud et al.,Search for an invisibly decaying higgs boson or dark matter candidates produced in association with a z boson in pp collisions at s=13 tev with the atlas detector, Physics Letters B776(2018) 318–337

2018
[51]

D. A. Kirzhnits,Weinberg model in the hot universe,JETP Lett.15(1972) 529–531

1972
[52]

Dolan and R

L. Dolan and R. Jackiw,Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3320–3341

1974
[53]

Weinberg,Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature,Phys

S. Weinberg,Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3357–3378

1974
[54]

A. D. Linde,Phase Transitions in Gauge Theories and Cosmology,Rept. Prog. Phys.42 (1979) 389

1979
[55]

Vilenkin,Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls and Strings,Phys

A. Vilenkin,Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls and Strings,Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 852–857. – 39 –

1981
[56]

Vilenkin and A

A. Vilenkin and A. E. Everett,Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls in Models with Goldstone and PseudoGoldstone Bosons,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1867–1870

1982
[57]

T. W. B. Kibble, G. Lazarides, and Q. Shafi,Walls Bounded by Strings,Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 435

1982
[58]

T. W. B. Kibble,Evolution of a system of cosmic strings,Nucl. Phys. B252(1985) 227. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 261, 750 (1985)]

1985
[59]

Vilenkin,Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls,Phys

A. Vilenkin,Cosmic Strings and Domain Walls,Phys. Rept.121(1985) 263–315

1985
[60]

M. B. Hindmarsh and T. W. B. Kibble,Cosmic strings,Rept. Prog. Phys.58(1995) 477–562, [hep-ph/9411342]. [61]LISACollaboration, P. Amaro-Seoane et al.,Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786

1995 arXiv
[62]

Z. Ren, T. Zhao, Z. Cao, Z.-K. Guo, W.-B. Han, H.-B. Jin, and Y.-L. Wu,Taiji data challenge for exploring gravitational wave universe,Front. Phys. (Beijing)18(2023), no. 6 64302, [arXiv:2301.02967]. [63]TianQinCollaboration, J. Luo et al.,TianQin: a space-borne gravitational w...

2023 arXiv
[64]

Yokoyama,Implication of pulsar timing array experiments on cosmological gravitational wave detection,AAPPS Bull.31(2021), no

J. Yokoyama,Implication of pulsar timing array experiments on cosmological gravitational wave detection,AAPPS Bull.31(2021), no. 1 17, [arXiv:2105.07629]

2021 arXiv
[65]

Davighi and N

J. Davighi and N. Lohitsiri,Anomaly interplay inU(2)gauge theories,JHEP05(2020) 098, [arXiv:2001.07731]

2020 arXiv
[66]

M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995. – 40 –

1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

E. P. Wigner,On Unitary Representations of the Inhomogeneous Lorentz Group,Annals of Mathematics40(Jan., 1939) 149–204

work page 1939

[2] [2]

E. P. Wigner,Unitary representations of the inhomogeneous Lorentz group including reflections, inGroup theoretical concepts and methods in elementary particle physics, pp. 37–80, Gordon and Breach, 1964

work page 1964

[3] [3]

Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields

S. Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 6, 2005

2005

[4] [4]

Weinberg,Feynman Rules for Any Spin,Phys

S. Weinberg,Feynman Rules for Any Spin,Phys. Rev.133(1964) B1318–B1332

work page 1964

[5] [5]

D. V. Ahluwalia,Spin-half bosons with mass dimension three half: towards a resolution of the cosmological constant problem,EPL131(2020), no. 4 41001, [arXiv:2008.02630]

arXiv 2020

[6] [6]

D. V. Ahluwalia and C.-Y. Lee,Spin-half bosons with mass dimension three-half: Evading the spin-statistics theorem,EPL140(2022), no. 2 24001, [arXiv:2212.09457]. [Erratum: EPL 140, 69901 (2022)]

arXiv 2022

[7] [7]

D. V. Ahluwalia,Mass Dimension One Fermions. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2019

work page 2019

[8] [8]

D. V. Ahluwalia, J. M. H. da Silva, C.-Y. Lee, Y.-X. Liu, S. H. Pereira, and M. M. Sorkhi, Mass dimension one fermions: Constructing darkness,Phys. Rept.967(2022) 1–43, [arXiv:2205.04754]

arXiv 2022