pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.10594 · v2 · submitted 2025-02-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Atomistic mechanism and interface-structure-energetics of van der Waals epitaxy demonstrated by layered alpha-MoO3 growth on mica

Faezeh A. F. Lahiji , Davide G. Sangiovanni , Biplab Paul , Justinas Palisaitis , Per O. A. Persson , Arnaud le Febvrier , Ganpati Ramanath , Per Eklund This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 02:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords van der Waals epitaxyalpha-MoO3micainterface energyab initio computationsepitaxial orientationslayered materials
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ab initio computations link Mo-K atomic proximity to the three observed low-energy orientations in alpha-MoO3 van der Waals epitaxy on mica.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that alpha-MoO3 grows on mica via van der Waals epitaxy in three non-equivalent in-plane orientations because those alignments minimize interface energy through close Mo-K contacts that maximize vdW attraction. Experimental diffraction and microscopy confirm the orientations and show negligible strain in continuous films, consistent with dislocation-free growth despite large lattice mismatch. Computations map the interface energies and tie the minima directly to the atomic proximities across the boundary. A reader would care because the result supplies a concrete, atomistic rule for selecting orientations and predicting when vdWE should occur in other layered film-substrate pairs.

Core claim

Ab initio computations showing interface energy minima for these orientations correlate with high cross-interface proximity between Mo atoms in alpha-MoO3 and K in mica conducive for maximal vdW attraction. These atomistic insights on interface structure and energetics provide a crucial framework for predicting vdWE for different film/substrate combinations and designing of stress-free and/or standalone epitaxial films of layered materials such as MoO3 on layered substrates such as f-mica.

What carries the argument

Interface energy minima computed from vdW attraction, selected by cross-interface Mo-K proximity.

If this is right

  • The three non-equivalent orientations correspond exactly to the computed energy minima.
  • Continuous epilayers remain strain-free and dislocation-free because the vdW interface tolerates the lattice mismatch.
  • The same proximity-based energy criterion can be applied to forecast vdWE in other layered material pairs.
  • Stress-free thick films or standalone layers become feasible once the low-energy orientations are identified computationally.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same computational mapping could be used to screen candidate substrates for a given layered film before any growth experiment.
  • If steps or defects on the mica surface shift the preferred orientation, the energy-minima picture would need an added kinetic term.
  • Extending the approach to other molybdates or vanadates on mica-like substrates would test how general the Mo-cation to K proximity rule is.

Load-bearing premise

The three observed orientations are chosen mainly because they give the lowest static interface energies from vdW attraction; growth kinetics, steps, or defects do not override those minima.

What would settle it

Finding a fourth in-plane orientation whose computed interface energy is lower than the three observed ones, or direct measurement during growth showing that a higher-energy orientation nucleates preferentially due to kinetics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.10594 by Arnaud le Febvrier, Biplab Paul, Davide G. Sangiovanni, Faezeh A. F. Lahiji, Ganpati Ramanath, Justinas Palisaitis, Per Eklund, Per O. A. Persson.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fig.1. X [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Unlike conventional epitaxy, van der Waals epitaxy (vdWE) allows nearly stress-free growth of thick films with highly oriented crystals without dislocations even for large film-substrate lattice mismatches. Despite reports of vdWE in numerous materials systems, an atomistic understanding of film/substrate interface structure that explains and predicts vdWE has remained elusive. Here, we address this knowledge gap by unveiling atomistic interface mechanisms for vdWE of alpha-MoO3(0k0) on mica(001). X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy reveal alpha-MoO3(0k0) epilayers with large columnar crystals in three non-equivalent in-plane orientations. These results, together with negligible strain buildup in continuous epilayers, confirm vdWE. Ab initio computations showing interface energy minima for these orientations correlate with high cross-interface proximity between Mo atoms in alpha-MoO3 and K in mica conducive for maximal vdW attraction. These atomistic insights on interface structure and energetics provide a crucial framework for predicting vdWE for different film/substrate combinations and designing of stress-free and/or standalone epitaxial films of layered materials such as MoO3 on layered substrates such as f-mica.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that van der Waals epitaxy (vdWE) of alpha-MoO3(0k0) on mica(001) proceeds via three non-equivalent in-plane orientations identified by XRD and electron microscopy, with negligible strain buildup confirming the vdWE regime. Ab initio interface-energy calculations are shown to exhibit minima precisely for these orientations, which correlate with configurations maximizing cross-interface Mo-K proximity and thereby vdW attraction; the work positions these atomistic details as a predictive framework for vdWE in other layered film/substrate pairs.

Significance. If the reported correlation between computed interface energies and observed orientations holds, the paper supplies a concrete atomistic basis for orientation selection in vdWE that is currently lacking in the literature. This could enable systematic prediction of compatible layered-material combinations and the design of dislocation-free, stress-free epitaxial films, which is a substantive advance for the field.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and §3 (computational methods): the correlation between interface-energy ordering and the three experimental orientations is central, yet the abstract supplies no mention of convergence criteria, k-point sampling, or vdW functional choice; these details (presumably in the full methods) should be cross-referenced explicitly so readers can assess the robustness of the energy ordering without consulting supplementary material.
  2. [Results] Figure 4 or equivalent (interface models): the Mo-K proximity argument would be strengthened by a quantitative metric (e.g., integrated pair-correlation or summed 1/r^6 terms) rather than a qualitative description; this would make the link between geometry and vdW energy more transparent.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript, accurate summary of the key results, and recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain consists of experimental identification of three in-plane orientations via XRD and TEM, followed by independent ab initio DFT computations of interface energies for those specific orientations. The computed energy ordering is shown to correlate with Mo-K atomic proximity maximizing vdW attraction. No equation, parameter fit, or self-citation reduces the interface-energy result to a quantity defined from the same experimental data; the ab initio calculations use standard functionals and are performed on fixed structural models without fitting to the observed orientations. The claim is framed as a correlation rather than a derivation that forces the experimental result. This structure is self-contained against external benchmarks (experiment vs. first-principles calculation) and exhibits none of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard DFT assumptions for van der Waals forces and conventional interpretation of XRD/EM data; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard assumptions underlying ab initio calculations of interface energies including treatment of van der Waals interactions
    Invoked when reporting interface energy minima from computations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5794 in / 1153 out tokens · 68369 ms · 2026-05-23T02:57:26.445531+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Conventional epitax y of a thin film on single -crystal substrates involves lattice matching and strong film-substrate interface bonding [4]

    Introduction Epitaxial thin films are essential for many emerging solid-state electronics and photonics device applications [1–3]. Conventional epitax y of a thin film on single -crystal substrates involves lattice matching and strong film-substrate interface bonding [4]. Also, the interfacial elastic strain energy stored in the film increases monotonical...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Thin film synthesis α-MoO3 films were deposited by pulsed dc reactive magnetron sputter deposition in a n ultrahigh vacuum chamber described elsewhere [33]

    Experimental details 2.1. Thin film synthesis α-MoO3 films were deposited by pulsed dc reactive magnetron sputter deposition in a n ultrahigh vacuum chamber described elsewhere [33]. The depositions were carried out on fluorphlogopite KMg3(AlSi3O10)F2 (referred henceforth as f-mica) and c-Al2O3 (c-sapphire) for comparison. The f-mica and c-sapphire substr...

    work page

  3. [3]

    1a) and c-sapphire (Fig

    Results X-ray diffractograms from molybdenum oxide films on f-mica (Fig. 1a) and c-sapphire (Fig. 1b) exclusively exhibit 0k0 peaks from α-MoO3 and reflections corresponding to the substrates. On the thickest films, i.e., tfilm = 160 nm, for both f-mica and c -sapphire substrates the XRD pattern presents weak diffraction peaks at 2θ = 23.08˚ and 83.04˚ co...

    work page

  4. [4]

    X-ray diffraction revealed a decreasing d -spacing trend in the 060 reflection with increasing thickness

    Conclusion α-MoO₃ thin films (2.5 to 160 nm) were deposited on f-mica and c-sapphire substrates at 400 °C, displaying primarily orthorhombic α -MoO₃ with 0k0 out-of-plane orientation on both substrates. X-ray diffraction revealed a decreasing d -spacing trend in the 060 reflection with increasing thickness. On f -mica, the FWHM also decreased, indicating ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    X. Xu, T. Guo, H. Kim, M.K. Hota, R.S. Alsaadi, M. Lanza, X. Zhang, H.N. Alshareef, Growth of 2D Materials at the Wafer Scale, Adv. Mater. 34 (2022) 2108258. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202108258

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202108258 2022

  6. [6]

    H. Kum, D. Lee, W. Kong, H. Kim, Y . Park, Y . Kim, Y . Baek, S.-H. Bae, K. Lee, J. Kim, Epitaxial growth and layer-transfer techniques for heterogeneous integration of materials for electronic and photonic devices, Nat. Electron. 2 (2019) 439 –450. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-019-0314-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41928-019-0314-2 2019

  7. [7]

    Koma, Molecular beam epitaxial growth of organic thin films, Prog

    A. Koma, Molecular beam epitaxial growth of organic thin films, Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater. 30 (1995) 129–152

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    Ohring, Materials science of thin films: depositon and structure, Academic press, 2002

    M. Ohring, Materials science of thin films: depositon and structure, Academic press, 2002

    work page 2002

  9. [9]

    Eaglesham, H

    D. Eaglesham, H. -J. Gossmann, M. Cerullo, Eaglesham DJ, Gossmann HJ, Cerullo M. Limiting thickness hepi for epitaxial growth and room-temperature Si growth on Si (100). Physical review letters. 1990 Sep 3;65(10):1227., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 1227–1230. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1227

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.1227 1990

  10. [10]

    Ekström, S

    E. Ekström, S. Hurand, A. Le Febvrier, A. Elsukova, P.O.Å. Persson, B. Paul, F. Eriksson, G. Sharma, O. V oznyy, D.G. Sangiovanni, G. Ramanath, P. Eklund, Microstructure control and property switching in stress -free van der Waals epitaxial VO2 films on mica, Mater. Des. 229 (2023) 111864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111864

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111864 2023

  11. [11]

    Steinberg, W

    S. Steinberg, W. Ducker, G. Vigil, C. Hyukjin, C. Frank, M. Tseng, D. Clarke, J. Israelachvili, Van der Waals epitaxial growth of α-alumina nanocrystals on mica, Science 260 (1993) 656–659

    work page 1993

  12. [12]

    Koma, Van der Waals epitaxy —a new epitaxial growth method for a highly lattice - mismatched system, Thin Solid Films 216 (1992) 72 –76

    A. Koma, Van der Waals epitaxy —a new epitaxial growth method for a highly lattice - mismatched system, Thin Solid Films 216 (1992) 72 –76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040- 6090(92)90872-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0040- 1992

  13. [13]

    Bhimanapati, Z

    G.R. Bhimanapati, Z. Lin, V . Meunier, Y . Jung, J. Cha, S. Das, D. Xiao, Y . Son, M.S. Strano, V .R. Cooper, L. Liang, S.G. Louie, E. Ringe, W. Zhou, S.S. Kim, R.R. Naik, B.G. Sumpter, H. Terrones, F. Xia, Y . Wang, J. Zhu, D. Akinwande, N. Alem, J.A. Schuller, R.E. Schaak, M. Terrones, J.A. Robinson, Recent Advances in Two -Dimensional Materials beyond ...

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b05556 2015

  14. [14]

    Butler, S.M

    S.Z. Butler, S.M. Hollen, L. Cao, Y . Cui, J.A. Gupta, H.R. Gutiérrez, T.F. Heinz, S.S. Hong, J. Huang, A.F. Ismach, E. Johnston -Halperin, M. Kuno, V .V . Plashnitsa, R.D. Robinson, R.S. Ruoff, S. Salahuddin, J. Shan, L. Shi, M.G. Spencer, M. Terrones, W . Windl, J.E. Goldberger, Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities in Two -Dimensional Materials Beyon...

    work page doi:10.1021/nn400280c 2013

  15. [15]

    Q. Chen, Y . Yin, F. Ren, M. Liang, X. Yi, Z. Liu, Van der Waals Epitaxy of III-Nitrides and Its Applications, Materials 13 (2020) 3835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13173835

    work page doi:10.3390/ma13173835 2020

  16. [16]

    Chu, Van der Waals oxide heteroepitaxy, Npj Quantum Mater

    Y.-H. Chu, Van der Waals oxide heteroepitaxy, Npj Quantum Mater. 2 (2017) 67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41535-017-0069-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-017-0069-9 2017

  17. [17]

    Geim, I.V

    A.K. Geim, I.V . Grigorieva, Van der Waals heterostructures, Nature 499 (2013) 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12385

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12385 2013

  18. [18]

    Kratzer, A

    M. Kratzer, A. Matkovic, C. Teichert, Adsorption and epitaxial growth of small organic semiconductors on hexagonal boron nitride, J. Phys. Appl. Phys. 52 (2019) 383001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab29cb

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6463/ab29cb 2019

  19. [19]

    Z. Wei, B. Li, C. Xia, Y . Cui, J. He, J. Xia, J. Li, Various Structures of 2D Transition‐Metal Dichalcogenides and Their Applications, Small Methods 2 (2018) 1800094. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201800094

    work page doi:10.1002/smtd.201800094 2018

  20. [20]

    Daudin, F

    B. Daudin, F. Donatini, C. Bougerol, B. Gayral, E. Bellet -Amalric, R. Vermeersch, N. 11 Feldberg, J.-L. Rouvière, M.J. Recio Carretero, N. Garro, S. Garcia-Orrit, A. Cros, Growth of zinc-blende GaN on muscovite mica by molecular beam epitaxy, Nanotechnology 32 (2021) 025601. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/abb6a5

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6528/abb6a5 2021

  21. [21]

    B. Li, L. Ding, P. Gui, N. Liu, Y . Yue, Z. Chen, Z. Song, J. Wen, H. Lei, Z. Zhu, X. Wang, M. Su, L. Liao, Y . Gao, D. Zhang, G. Fang, Pulsed Laser Deposition Assisted van der Waals Epitaxial Large Area Quasi‐2D ZnO Single‐Crystal Plates on Fluorophlog opite Mica, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 6 (2019) 1901156. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201901156

    work page doi:10.1002/admi.201901156 2019

  22. [22]

    Li, J.-C

    C.-I. Li, J.-C. Lin, H.-J. Liu, M.-W. Chu, H.-W. Chen, C.-H. Ma, C.-Y . Tsai, H.-W. Huang, H.-J. Lin, H. -L. Liu, P. -W. Chiu, Y .-H. Chu, van der Waal Epitaxy of Flexible and Transparent VO 2 Film on Muscovite, Chem. Mater. 28 (2016) 3914 –3919. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01180

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01180 2016

  23. [23]

    Q. Lian, X. Zhu, X. Wang, W. Bai, J. Yang, Y . Zhang, R. Qi, R. Huang, W. Hu, X. Tang, J. Wang, J. Chu, Ultrahigh‐Detectivity Photodetectors with Van der Waals Epitaxial CdTe Single‐Crystalline Films, Small 15 (2019) 1900236. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201900236

    work page doi:10.1002/smll.201900236 2019

  24. [24]

    L. Lu, Y . Dai, H. Du, M. Liu, J. Wu, Y . Zhang, Z. Liang, S. Raza, D. Wang, C. Jia, Atomic Scale Understanding of the Epitaxy of Perovskite Oxides on Flexible Mica Substrate, Adv. Mater. Interfaces 7 (2020) 1901265. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201901265

    work page doi:10.1002/admi.201901265 2020

  25. [25]

    Utama, F.J

    M.I.B. Utama, F.J. Belarre, C. Magen, B. Peng, J. Arbiol, Q. Xiong, Incommensurate van der Waals Epitaxy of Nanowire Arrays: A Case Study with ZnO on Muscovite Mica Substrates, Nano Lett. 12 (2012) 2146–2152. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl300554t

    work page doi:10.1021/nl300554t 2012

  26. [26]

    Wu, P.-F

    P.-C. Wu, P.-F. Chen, T.H. Do, Y .-H. Hsieh, C.-H. Ma, T.D. Ha, K.-H. Wu, Y .-J. Wang, H.- B. Li, Y .-C. Chen, J.-Y . Juang, P. Yu, L.M. Eng, C.-F. Chang, P.-W. Chiu, L.H. Tjeng, Y .- H. Chu, Heteroepitaxy of Fe 3 O 4 /Muscovite: A New Perspective for Flexible Spintronics, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 (2016) 33794 –33801. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b11610

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.6b11610 2016

  27. [27]

    Yen, Y .-H

    M. Yen, Y .-H. Lai, C. -L. Zhang, H. -Y . Cheng, Y .-T. Hsieh, J. -W. Chen, Y .-C. Chen, L. Chang, N. -T. Tsou, J. -Y . Li, Y .-H. Chu, Giant Resistivity Change of Transparent ZnO/Muscovite Heteroepitaxy, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 (2020) 21818 –21826. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c02275

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.0c02275 2020

  28. [28]

    Tak, M.-M

    B.R. Tak, M.-M. Yang, Y .-H. Lai, Y .-H. Chu, M. Alexe, R. Singh, Photovoltaic and flexible deep ultraviolet wavelength detector based on novel β-Ga2O3/muscovite heteroepitaxy, Sci. Rep. 10 (2020) 16098

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Rasool, R

    A. Rasool, R. Amiruddin, I.R. Mohamed, M.C.S. Kumar, Fabrication and characterization of resistive random access memory (ReRAM) devices using molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) as switching layer, Superlattices Microstruct. 147 (2020) 106682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106682

    work page doi:10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106682 2020

  30. [30]

    Arita, H

    M. Arita, H. Kaji, T. Fujii, Y . Takahashi, Resistance switching properties of molybdenum oxide films, Thin Solid Films 520 (2012) 4762 –4767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2011.10.174

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2011.10.174 2012

  31. [31]

    Sabhapathi, O.Md

    V .K. Sabhapathi, O.Md. Hussain, P.S. Reddy, K.T.R. Reddy, S. Uthanna, B.S. Naidu, P.J. Reddy, Optical absorption studies in molybdenum trioxide thin films, Phys. Status Solidi A 148 (1995) 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2211480114

    work page doi:10.1002/pssa.2211480114 1995

  32. [32]

    Mutschall, K

    D. Mutschall, K. Holzner, E. Obermeier, Sputtered molybdenum oxide thin films for NH3 detection, Sens. Actuators B Chem. 36 (1996) 320 –324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925- 4005(97)80089-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s0925- 1996

  33. [33]

    Magnéli, G

    A. Magnéli, G. Andersson, G. Sundkvist, On the MoO2 structure type, Acta Chem Scand 9 (1955) 1378–1381

    work page 1955

  34. [34]

    MAGNÉLI, B

    A. MAGNÉLI, B. В.L.-H. ANSSON, L. KIHLBORG, G. SUNDKVIST, Studies on Molybdenum and Molybdenum Wolfram Oxides of the Homologous Series МеnO3n_1, 12 Acta Chem Scand 9 (1955)

    work page 1955

  35. [35]

    Concepción, O

    O. Concepción, O. De Melo, The versatile family of molybdenum oxides: synthesis, properties, and recent applications, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 35 (2023) 143002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/acb24a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/acb24a 2023

  36. [36]

    Scarminio, A

    J. Scarminio, A. Lourenço, A. Gorenstein, Electrochromism and photochromism in amorphous molybdenum oxide films, Thin Solid Films 302 (1997) 66 –70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(96)09539-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0040-6090(96)09539-9 1997

  37. [37]

    Le Febvrier, L

    A. Le Febvrier, L. Landälv, T. Liersch, D. Sandmark, P. Sandström, P. Eklund, An upgraded ultra -high vacuum magnetron -sputtering system for high -versatility and software-controlled deposition, V acuum 187 (2021) 110137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110137

    work page doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110137 2021