Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Generating Skyline Datasets for Data Science Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11262 v1 pith:CS2IKY5N submitted 2025-02-16 cs.DB cs.AI

Generating Skyline Datasets for Data Science Models

classification cs.DB cs.AI
keywords datadatasetsskylinealgorithmmodisalgorithmsbiasdata-driven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Preparing high-quality datasets required by various data-driven AI and machine learning models has become a cornerstone task in data-driven analysis. Conventional data discovery methods typically integrate datasets towards a single pre-defined quality measure that may lead to bias for downstream tasks. This paper introduces MODis, a framework that discovers datasets by optimizing multiple user-defined, model-performance measures. Given a set of data sources and a model, MODis selects and integrates data sources into a skyline dataset, over which the model is expected to have the desired performance in all the performance measures. We formulate MODis as a multi-goal finite state transducer, and derive three feasible algorithms to generate skyline datasets. Our first algorithm adopts a "reduce-from-universal" strategy, that starts with a universal schema and iteratively prunes unpromising data. Our second algorithm further reduces the cost with a bi-directional strategy that interleaves data augmentation and reduction. We also introduce a diversification algorithm to mitigate the bias in skyline datasets. We experimentally verify the efficiency and effectiveness of our skyline data discovery algorithms, and showcase their applications in optimizing data science pipelines.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.