Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Counterfactual-Consistency Prompting for Relative Temporal Understanding in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11425 v2 pith:3NOW2BOI submitted 2025-02-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords temporaleventsmodelsunderstandingconsistencycounterfactuallanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the advanced capabilities of large language models (LLMs), their temporal reasoning ability remains underdeveloped. Prior works have highlighted this limitation, particularly in maintaining temporal consistency when understanding events. For example, models often confuse mutually exclusive temporal relations like ``before'' and ``after'' between events and make inconsistent predictions. In this work, we tackle the issue of temporal inconsistency in LLMs by proposing a novel counterfactual prompting approach. Our method generates counterfactual questions and enforces collective constraints, enhancing the model's consistency. We evaluate our method on multiple datasets, demonstrating significant improvements in event ordering for explicit and implicit events and temporal commonsense understanding by effectively addressing temporal inconsistencies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Time-R1: Towards Comprehensive Temporal Reasoning in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 3B model trained by staged reinforcement learning with rule-based rewards claims to outperform 671B models on temporal prediction and generation, though test-set checkpoint selection and synthetic training data weak...

Pith tools