REVIEW 1 cited by
Counterfactual-Consistency Prompting for Relative Temporal Understanding in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Despite the advanced capabilities of large language models (LLMs), their temporal reasoning ability remains underdeveloped. Prior works have highlighted this limitation, particularly in maintaining temporal consistency when understanding events. For example, models often confuse mutually exclusive temporal relations like ``before'' and ``after'' between events and make inconsistent predictions. In this work, we tackle the issue of temporal inconsistency in LLMs by proposing a novel counterfactual prompting approach. Our method generates counterfactual questions and enforces collective constraints, enhancing the model's consistency. We evaluate our method on multiple datasets, demonstrating significant improvements in event ordering for explicit and implicit events and temporal commonsense understanding by effectively addressing temporal inconsistencies.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Time-R1: Towards Comprehensive Temporal Reasoning in LLMs
A 3B model trained by staged reinforcement learning with rule-based rewards claims to outperform 671B models on temporal prediction and generation, though test-set checkpoint selection and synthetic training data weak...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.