REVIEW 3 cited by
Towards Fully Exploiting LLM Internal States to Enhance Knowledge Boundary Perception
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Towards Fully Exploiting LLM Internal States to Enhance Knowledge Boundary Perception
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive performance across diverse tasks but often struggle to accurately gauge their knowledge boundaries, leading to confident yet incorrect responses. This paper explores leveraging LLMs' internal states to enhance their perception of knowledge boundaries from efficiency and risk perspectives. We investigate whether LLMs can estimate their confidence using internal states before response generation, potentially saving computational resources. Our experiments on datasets like Natural Questions, HotpotQA, and MMLU reveal that LLMs demonstrate significant pre-generation perception, which is further refined post-generation, with perception gaps remaining stable across varying conditions. To mitigate risks in critical domains, we introduce Confidence Consistency-based Calibration ($C^3$), which assesses confidence consistency through question reformulation. $C^3$ significantly improves LLMs' ability to recognize their knowledge gaps, enhancing the unknown perception rate by 5.6% on NQ and 4.9% on HotpotQA. Our findings suggest that pre-generation confidence estimation can optimize efficiency, while $C^3$ effectively controls output risks, advancing the reliability of LLMs in practical applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Can LLM Rerankers Predict Their Own Ranking Performance?
LLM rerankers can internally predict ranking quality via self-consistency of sampled outputs, matching SOTA external QPP while direct confidence is overconfident; supervised token-efficient methods improve calibration.
-
Decoupling Reasoning and Confidence: Resurrecting Calibration in Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards
DCPO decouples reasoning optimization from calibration in RLVR to fix overconfidence in LLMs without losing accuracy.
-
Decoupling Reasoning and Confidence: Resurrecting Calibration in Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards
DCPO decouples reasoning and calibration in RLVR, matching GRPO accuracy while reducing overconfidence via a claimed fundamental gradient conflict.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.