Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Can LLMs Simulate Social Media Engagement? A Study on Action-Guided Response Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.12073 v1 pith:H3DSX2LH submitted 2025-02-17 cs.CL

Can LLMs Simulate Social Media Engagement? A Study on Action-Guided Response Generation

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsengagementmediaresponsesocialgenerationactionuser
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Social media enables dynamic user engagement with trending topics, and recent research has explored the potential of large language models (LLMs) for response generation. While some studies investigate LLMs as agents for simulating user behavior on social media, their focus remains on practical viability and scalability rather than a deeper understanding of how well LLM aligns with human behavior. This paper analyzes LLMs' ability to simulate social media engagement through action guided response generation, where a model first predicts a user's most likely engagement action-retweet, quote, or rewrite-towards a trending post before generating a personalized response conditioned on the predicted action. We benchmark GPT-4o-mini, O1-mini, and DeepSeek-R1 in social media engagement simulation regarding a major societal event discussed on X. Our findings reveal that zero-shot LLMs underperform BERT in action prediction, while few-shot prompting initially degrades the prediction accuracy of LLMs with limited examples. However, in response generation, few-shot LLMs achieve stronger semantic alignment with ground truth posts.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Revising Context, Shifting Simulated Stance: Auditing LLM-Based Stance Simulation in Online Discussions

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Counterfactual context revision shows LLM-simulated stances shift effectively and robustly under text-only and multimodal changes, as measured by directional shift and transition rates.

  2. HotComment: A Benchmark for Evaluating Popularity of Online Comments

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    HotComment is a new multimodal benchmark that quantifies online comment popularity via content quality assessment, interaction-based prediction, and agent-simulated user engagement, accompanied by the StyleCmt stylist...

  3. Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Social Media Analytics: A Multi-task Quest

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLMs show mixed results on authorship verification, post generation, and attribute inference from Twitter data, with new frameworks and user studies establishing benchmarks for these analytics tasks.